Picuris SYNTAX

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Picuris SYNTAX INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. ' The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the doc.-srsent photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart,etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St. John's Road, Tyler's Green High Wycombe, Bucks. England HP10 8HR Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 78-4620 ZAHARLICK, Ann Marie, 1947- PI CURIS SYNTAX. The American University, Ph.D., 1977 Language, linguistics University Microfiims International, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 © 1977 ANN MARIE ZAHARLICK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. PICURis SYNTAX by Ann Marie Zaharlick Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of The American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology Signatures of Committee: Chairman: L r ( j U / Date: / 1977 The American University Washington, D.C. 20016 THE AMERICA!! U:;iVZ20I7Y LI21 lpy Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To the people of Picuris who cherish their language and value its preservation. ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Had it not been for the cooperation and considerable assistance of many individuals, this study might never have been made. Although it is impossible to mention all the people who helped me, several will be singled out for special recognition. Hopefully, all will accept this work as an expression of my gratitude. I must first thank my major professor, William L. Leap, for providing my early linguistic training, introducing me to the Tanoan languages, and monitoring my research and analytical progress. Through Dr. Leap I made the acquaint­ ance of George L. Trager. I was fortunate to receive training from Dr. Trager while I attended a field school at the Southern Methodist University, Ft. Burgwin Research Center in New Mexico. It was Dr. Trager who encouraged me to con­ tinue the work on Picuris which his late wife, Felicia Harben Trager, had begun some ten years earlier than my efforts. John J. Bodine, one of my committee members and Chairman of The American University, Department of Anthropology, helped me in numerous ways as both advisor and friend. To say that he "helped" me is really an understatement, for without his constant support and advice, I might not have enjoyed or profited from the whole experience as much as I did. He iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. advised me on the nuances of doing fieldwork in northern New Mexico and provided some initial financial assistance and field experience by inviting me to apply with him for a research grant which we subsequently received. Dr. Bodine also saw me through some of the more difficult admin­ istrative and technical aspects of completing the dissertation. I also benefited from discussions with my third committee member, Robert Fox, of the English Language Institute at The American University, who offered a valuable perspective on the linguistic analysis and Elizabeth A. Brandt, of Arizona State University, who readily shared her knowledge of Tiwa grammar. To all of these individuals I wish to express my sincere thanks. I would also like to recognize the organizations which provided funds for the data collection and analysis phases of this work. I received a Dissertation Fellowship from The American University and shared a faculty research grant with Dr. Bodine from the same institution. The National Science Foundation awarded me a Dissertation Improvement Grant, with Dr. Leap functioning as the principal investigator. These funds enabled me to work in New Mexico for a year and a half and accomplish the bulk of research reported in this dissertation. Of course, the most important contribution was made by the Picuris people themselves who permitted this work to proceed. I wish to thank the 1974 Pueblo Governor, Pat iv Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Martinez, and the Picuris Tribal Council for permission to initiate the study of the Picuris language, I would also like to thank Governor Joe Quanchello and the Picuris Education Committee for their continuing support. While many Picuris people have extended their friendship and hospitality, for which I will always be grateful, there are a few individuals whom I feel compelled to thank individually for their special encouragement and assistance. My deep thanks go to Cora Durand, Pat and Margaret Martinez, Marina Simbola, and Edith Simbola Martinez. Particularly valuable has been the assistance of Edith Simbola Martinez who crit­ ically examined all of the data contained in this study. Last, but not least, I must recognize three individ­ uals wnc played important roles in this study. I would like to thank Telesfor Romero who kindly provided me transportation while I was gathering my data. Penny Katson deserves special praise for taking on and competently typing such a difficult manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank my friend, Donna Roxey, for typing and editing the drafts of this work. Her assistance was invaluable. A. M. Zaharlick Albuquerque, New Mexico September, 1977 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter I. INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 II. PICIJRlS PHONOLOGY.......................... 19 2.0 Introduction......................... 19 2 .1 Previous W o r k ....................... 19 2.2 Phoneme Is Defined................... 20 2.3 Consonant Phonemes................... 20 2.4 Vowel Phonemes....................... 24 2.5 Stress Phonemes..................... 31 2.6 Tone Phonemes....................... 33 2.7 Transition Phonemes ................. 34 2.8 Phonological Utterances ............. 36 2.9 Syllable Structure................... 37 III. WORDS AND WORD STRUCTURE IN PICURIS GRAMMAR............................ 41 3.0 Introduction......................... 41 3.1 Morpheme Is Defined................. 41 3.2 Picuris Word Structure............... 42 3.3 N o u n s ............................... 44 3.31 Stem Extension................. 45 3.32 Noun Environments............. 48 3.33 Noun Prefix Inflections....... 49 3.331 Noun Prefixes............ 50 3.332 Summary of Noun Prefixes.............. 54 3.4 V e r b s ............................... 54 3.41 Verb Prefix Inflections....... 56 3.411 Verbal Prefix Paradigms.............. 57 vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. 3 412 First and Second Person Object Prefixes............. 60 3.42 Verb Suffixes................. 61 3.43 Final Clitics................. 62 3.5 Particles........................... 64 IV. PICURfS SYNTAX........................... 8 2 4.0 Introduction....................... 8 2 4.1 Methodology for Picuris Syntactic Analysis ............... 82 4.11 Rationale..................... 82 4.12 Isletan Syntax............... 85 4.13 Terminology................... 88 4.14 Procedure..................... 89 4.2 Nouns............................... 90 4.21 Phrase-Words................. 93 4.22 Noun Phrases................. 102 4.221 Noun-Clitic Forms .... 102 4.222 Compound Base Nouns Plus Clitic.......... 106 4.223 Other Clitics.......... 112 4.23 Summary....................... 116 4.3 Verbs and Verb Constructions....... 116 4.31 The Verb-Word................. 118 4.32 Suffixless Verbs ............. 124 4.33 Summary....................... 126
Recommended publications
  • Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas
    Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas edited by Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, and Daisy Rosenblum Language Documentation & Conservation Special Publication No. 2 Published as a sPecial Publication of language documentation & conservation language documentation & conservation Department of Linguistics, UHM Moore Hall 569 1890 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822 USA http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc university of hawai‘i Press 2840 Kolowalu Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822-1888 USA © All texts and images are copyright to the respective authors. 2010 All chapters are licensed under Creative Commons Licenses Cover design by Cameron Chrichton Cover photograph of salmon drying racks near Lime Village, Alaska, by Andrea L. Berez Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication data ISBN 978-0-8248-3530-9 http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4463 Contents Foreword iii Marianne Mithun Contributors v Acknowledgments viii 1. Introduction: The Boasian tradition and contemporary practice 1 in linguistic fieldwork in the Americas Daisy Rosenblum and Andrea L. Berez 2. Sociopragmatic influences on the development and use of the 9 discourse marker vet in Ixil Maya Jule Gómez de García, Melissa Axelrod, and María Luz García 3. Classifying clitics in Sm’algyax: 33 Approaching theory from the field Jean Mulder and Holly Sellers 4. Noun class and number in Kiowa-Tanoan: Comparative-historical 57 research and respecting speakers’ rights in fieldwork Logan Sutton 5. The story of *o in the Cariban family 91 Spike Gildea, B.J. Hoff, and Sérgio Meira 6. Multiple functions, multiple techniques: 125 The role of methodology in a study of Zapotec determiners Donna Fenton 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Languages, Indigenous Languages of the Native Peoples of North, Middle, and South America
    Native American Languages, indigenous languages of the native peoples of North, Middle, and South America. The precise number of languages originally spoken cannot be known, since many disappeared before they were documented. In North America, around 300 distinct, mutually unintelligible languages were spoken when Europeans arrived. Of those, 187 survive today, but few will continue far into the 21st century, since children are no longer learning the vast majority of these. In Middle America (Mexico and Central America) about 300 languages have been identified, of which about 140 are still spoken. South American languages have been the least studied. Around 1500 languages are known to have been spoken, but only about 350 are still in use. These, too are disappearing rapidly. Classification A major task facing scholars of Native American languages is their classification into language families. (A language family consists of all languages that have evolved from a single ancestral language, as English, German, French, Russian, Greek, Armenian, Hindi, and others have all evolved from Proto-Indo-European.) Because of the vast number of languages spoken in the Americas, and the gaps in our information about many of them, the task of classifying these languages is a challenging one. In 1891, Major John Wesley Powell proposed that the languages of North America constituted 58 independent families, mainly on the basis of superficial vocabulary resemblances. At the same time Daniel Brinton posited 80 families for South America. These two schemes form the basis of subsequent classifications. In 1929 Edward Sapir tentatively proposed grouping these families into superstocks, 6 in North America and 15 in Middle America.
    [Show full text]
  • An Operational Paradigm of Cultural Sovereignty at Taos Pueblo by Jose
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ASU Digital Repository An Operational Paradigm of Cultural Sovereignty at Taos Pueblo by Jose Vicente Lujan A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Bryan McKinley Jones Brayboy, Co-Chair K. Tsianina Lomawaima, Co-Chair Myla Vicenti Carpio ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 DEDICATION We have lived upon this land from days beyond history’s records, far past any living memory, deep into the time of legend. The story of my people and the story of this place are one single story. No man can think of us without thinking of this place. We are always joined together. - Taos Pueblo elder and Tribal Manifesto I dedicate this dissertation to the red willow children of the past, present, and future. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the various people who have journeyed with me in recent years as I have worked toward completing this dissertation. First, I owe an enormous debt of gratitude to un-tdahm-wapu-ee pien-pah hut un-kah-wapu-ee uub-uuh-tsemah (my late father mountain cloud and my late mother new chokecherry) who brought me into this world and made me who I am today. Throughout the struggles and trials of this dissertation, I thought about them daily and missed them dearly. I hope they are walking with the spirits of our ancestors. Secondly, I would like to thank my loving wife Arvella, my darling Missy, and my sweetheart Nick who have each inspired me along this journey from the place of the red willows to the setting sun’s house in the west.
    [Show full text]
  • [.35 **Natural Language Processing Class Here Computational Linguistics See Manual at 006.35 Vs
    006 006 006 DeweyiDecimaliClassification006 006 [.35 **Natural language processing Class here computational linguistics See Manual at 006.35 vs. 410.285 *Use notation 019 from Table 1 as modified at 004.019 400 DeweyiDecimaliClassification 400 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 [400 [400 *‡Language Class here interdisciplinary works on language and literature For literature, see 800; for rhetoric, see 808. For the language of a specific discipline or subject, see the discipline or subject, plus notation 014 from Table 1, e.g., language of science 501.4 (Option A: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, class in 410, where full instructions appear (Option B: To give local emphasis or a shorter number to a specific language, place before 420 through use of a letter or other symbol. Full instructions appear under 420–490) 400 DeweyiDecimali400Classification Language 400 SUMMARY [401–409 Standard subdivisions and bilingualism [410 Linguistics [420 English and Old English (Anglo-Saxon) [430 German and related languages [440 French and related Romance languages [450 Italian, Dalmatian, Romanian, Rhaetian, Sardinian, Corsican [460 Spanish, Portuguese, Galician [470 Latin and related Italic languages [480 Classical Greek and related Hellenic languages [490 Other languages 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [401 *‡Philosophy and theory See Manual at 401 vs. 121.68, 149.94, 410.1 401 DeweyiDecimali401Classification Language 401 [.3 *‡International languages Class here universal languages; general
    [Show full text]
  • Nasal Vowels. Working Papers'an Language Universals, No
    r, DOCUMENT RESUME ED 101 552 FL 006 213 AUTHOR Ruhlen, Merritt TITLE Nasal Vowels. Working Papers'an Language Universals, No. 12. INSTITUTION Stanford Univ., Calif. Committee on Linguistics. PUB DATE Nov 73 NOTE 31'p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.95 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *contrastive Linguistics; *Diachronic Linguistics; *Language Universals; Linguistic Theory; Phonemics; Phonetics; Phonological Units; Phonology; *Synchronic Linquistics; *Vowels ABSTRACT This paper is an investigation of nasal vowels from both a synchronic and a diachronic point of view. Data fromover 50 languages have been examined (somelanguages in much more detail than others) in an attempt to distingaish the aspects of vowel nasalization that are huniversalm from those phenomena thatare langoage-specific. This study is chiefly concerned with such questions as the following:(1) What is a nasal vowel? (2) Why do nasal vowels arise? (3) What is the historical source of nasal vowels? (4) What is the synchronic origin of nasal vowels? (5)How are nasal vowels used?(6) How do- systems of nasal vowels change and disappear? (Author/KM) Working Papers on Language Universals No. 12, November 1973 pp. 1-36 NASAL VOWELS Merritt Ruh len Language Universals Project t. ABSTRACT This paper is an investigation of nasal vowels from both a synchronic and a diachronic point of view. Dita from over fifty langua'es have been examined (some languages in much more detail than others) in an attempt to distinguish the aspects of vowel nasalization which are 'universal' from those phenomena which are language specific. We will be chiefly concerned with such questions as the following: (1)What is a nasal vowel? (2) Why do nasal vowels arise? (3) What is the historical source of nasal voi.vels? (4) What is the synchronic origin of nasal vowels? (5) How are nasal vowels used? (6) How do systems of nasal vowels change and disappear? U S.
    [Show full text]
  • PTVC-Cuny Paper2
    A prosodic theory of vocalic contrasts* Chris Golston and Wolfgang Kehrein California State University Fresno and University of Groningen/University of Amsterdam Phonetic transcription allows us to put in square brackets many things that languages do not actually make use of, such as palatalized velar glides [ɰʲ] or velarized palatal glides [jˠ]. It also allows us to posit unattested contrasts like pre- vs. post-palatalized nasals [ʲn∼nʲ] and to entertain what seem to be purely orthographic contrasts like [pja∼pʲa]. We argue here that natural language does not use such refined distinctions and offer a more restrictive theory of vocalic features that treats them as properties of syllable margins (onsets and codas) rather than properties of individual consonants. Following Ladefoged & Maddieson (1996, 2), our study focuses on the elements "that are known to distinguish lexical items within a language", i.e., on minimal-pair contrasts involving labialization, palatalization, and velarization within single morphemes.1 The facts we present here suggest that natural languages allow at most a single unordered set of vocalic features per syllable margin, whatever the number of segments in that domain. For this reason, we propose that (1) An onset or coda has a single unordered set of vocalic features. The idea that vocalic features may characterize prosodic levels above the segment is not new of course (Harris 1944; Firth 1948, 1957; Goldsmith 1990). What is novel here is our claim that secondary vocalic features only characterize prosodic levels above the segment, that no consonant licenses vocalic features on its own. A number of predictions follow from this claim that do not follow from segmental or subsegmental accounts of vocalic licensing.
    [Show full text]
  • Friction Between Phonetics and Phonology the Status of Affricates
    Friction between Phonetics and Phonology The status of affricates Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 5775 Trans 10 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: [email protected] The Netherlands http://www.lotschool.nl ISBN: 978-94-6093-122-2 NUR 616 Copyright © 2013 by Janine Berns. All rights reserved. Friction between Phonetics and Phonology The status of affricates Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann, volgens besluit van het college van decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op vrijdag 8 november 2013 om 10.30 uur precies door Janine Katharina Maria Berns geboren op 18 juni 1985 te Kerkrade Promotoren: Prof. dr. Haike Jacobs Prof. dr. Bernard Laks (Université Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense) Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. dr. Anneke Neijt Prof. dr. Barbara Bullock (University of Texas) Prof. dr. Marie-Hélène Côté (University of Ottawa) Prof. dr. Frans Hinskens (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) Prof. dr. Jeroen van de Weijer (Shanghai International Studies University) “As a rule,” said Holmes, “the more bizarre a thing is the less mysterious it proves to be”. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, The Red-headed League. (1891) Acknowledgements I would like to dedicate the very first lines of this thesis to my two supervisors, Haike Jacobs and Bernard Laks. Haike, thank you for giving me the freedom to develop my own interests and insights, but also for being there with your enlightening comments when I felt lost or when I was complicating things too much.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 17Th Annual Round Table
    Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics Number 19, 1966 edited by F. P. Dinneen, SJ 17th Annual Round Table Georgetown University School of Languages and Linguistics REPORT OF THE SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL ROUND TABLE MEETING ON LINGUISTICS AND LANGUAGE STUDIES FRANCIS P. DINNEEN, S.J. EDITOR GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS Washington, D.C. 20007 ©Copyright 1966 GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY PRESS SCHOOL OF LANGUAGES AND LINGUISTICS GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 58-31607 Lithographed in U.SA. by EDWARDS BROTHERS, INC. Ann Arbor, Michigan TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword v WELCOMING REMARKS Rev. Frank L. Fadner, S.J., Regent Institute of Languages and Linguistics vii Robert Lado, Dean Institute of Languages and Linguistics ix I. PROBLEMS IN SEMANTICS John L. Fischer Interrogatives in Ponapean: Some Semantic and Grammatical Aspects 1 Charles J. Fillmore A Proposal Concerning English Prepositions 19 Gerhard Nickel Operational Procedures in Semantics, with Special Reference to Medieval English 35 James B. Fraser Some Remarks on the Verb-Particle Construction in English 45 DISCUSSION 63 II. FIRST LUNCHEON ADDRESS George L. Trager Linguistics as Anthropology 71 IIL HISTORY OF LINGUISTICS Karl V. Teeter The History of Linguistics: New Lamps for Old 83 iv / TABLE OF CONTENTS Hugo Mueller On Re-Reading von Humboldt 97 John Viertel Concepts of Language Underlying the 18th Century Controversy about the Origin of Language 109 Geoffrey Bursill-Hall Aspects of Modistic Grammar 133 DISCUSSION 149 IV. LINGUISTICS AND ENGLISH Stanley Sapon Shaping Productive Verbal Behavior in a Non-Speaking Child: A Case Report 157 Paul M. Postal On So-Called 'Pronouns' in English 177 Terence E.
    [Show full text]
  • John P. Harrington Papers 1907-1959
    THE PAPERS OF John Peabody Harringtan IN THE Smithsonian Institution 1907-1957 VOLUME FOUR A GUIDE TO THE FIELD NOTES: NATIVE AMERICAN HISTORY, LANGUAGE, AND CULTURE OF THE SOUTHWEST EDITED BY Elaine L. Mills and AnnJ Brickfield KRAUS INTER ATIONAL PUBLICATIONS A Division of Kraus-Thomson Organization Limited THE PAPERS OF John Peabody Harringtan IN THE Smithsonian Institution 1907-1957 VOLUME FOUR A GUIDE TO THE FIELD NOTES: Native American History, Language, and Culture of the Southwest Prepared in the National AnthropologicalArchives Department ofAnthropology National Museum ofNatural History Washington, D.C. THE PAPERS OF John Peabody Harringtan IN THE Smithsonian Institution 1907-1957 VOLUME FOUR A GUIDE TO THE FIELD NOTES: Native American History, Language, and Culture of the Southwest EDITED BY Elaine L. Mills and AnnJ. Brickfield KRAUS INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATIONS A Division of Kraus-Thomson Organization Limited White Plains, N.Y. © Copyright The Smithsonian Institution 1986 All rights reserved. No part ofthis work covered by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in anyform or by any means-graphic, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or taping, information storage and retrieval systems-without written permission ofthe publisher. First Printing Printed in the United Str.:tes of America The paper in this publication meets the minimum Contents requirements of American National Standard for Information Science- Permanence of Papers for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. INTRODUCTION N / Vll Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Scope and Content ofthis Publication IV / vn (Revised for vol. 4) History ofthe Papers and the Microfilm Edition IV / vnl Harrington, John Peabody. The papers ofJohn Peabody Harrington in the Editorial Procedures IV / X Smithsonian Institution, 1907-1957.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of [W]: an Exercise in the Phonetic (Eds.)
    The story of [w]: He notes that additional evidence on the phonological identity of such double stops An exercise in the phonetic explanation may be gained by observing how they pattern in phonological rules, e.g., the labiovelar for sound patterns stops in Kpelle and Yoruba must be velars since preceding nasals assimilating to their place of articulation show up as [ ] not [m]. In languages where labiovelars pattern John Ohala and James Lorentz as both labials and velars, e.g., the /w/ in Fula, he proposes that there must be two /w/'s, one phonologically labial and one velar. University of California, Berkeley Central to the taxonomic generative position is the not-always-clearly-defined distinction between the phonetic and phonological (or "underlying") character of Impressionistically-based, pre-theoretical taxonomies, such as many developing speech sounds. We will comment on this in more detail below. scientific disciplines use, are a mixed blessing. On the one hand they serve the We will show that the question of whether labiovelars are primarily labial or essential, useful function of helping to organize what would otherwise be an unwieldy velar is a pseudo-problem necessitated by the largely taxonomic approach taken by mass of unrelated data but on the other hand they tend to petrify the thinking of those phonologists. We will do this in two ways. First, by demonstrating that the using the taxonomies, making it difficult for them to deal with the data except insofar 'pigeonhole-filling' approach does not yield convincing results and, second, by as they fit into the pigeonholes which have been set up.
    [Show full text]
  • Universals, Their Violation and the Notion of Phonologically Peculiar Languages 2
    1 Vladimir Pericliev Journal of Universal Language 5 March 2004, 1-28 Universals, Their Violation and the Notion of Phonologically Pe- culiar Languages Vladimir Pericliev Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Abstract A language can be said to be “peculiar” if it violates a universal pattern that admits only very few excep- tions. In the paper, we propose a typology of phonological peculiarities concerning the content of segment inventories, and deal in detail with one of these types. The type involves the illegitimate absence of a segment that an implicational universal predicts should actually be present in the segment inventory of a language. A computer program retrieved 33 phonological peculiarities of this type in the UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database (UPSID), comprising 451 languages. It turned out that 391 of these languages had no peculiarity of the type studied, 43 had one, and 17 more than one peculiarity. Some observations are made regarding the last category of 17 “strongly peculiar” languages. In particular, it is shown that despite their strong phonological idiosyncrasy, the peculiar languages have only a limited variability in that they cannot violate more than six universals or have more than three distinct segments lacking. Keywords: phonological universals, types of phonological peculiarities, gaps in segment inventories 1. Introduction A language can be said to be “peculiar” (or “deviant”) if there is a universally valid norm for the class of all languages and this language belongs to a very small subclass of languages that violate the norm. The violated norm (or universal) can be any sort of linguistic object (entity, relation, rule, etc.), and depending on the domain to which the norm belongs, linguistic peculiarities can be phonological, morphological, syntactic or semantic.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersecting Systems of Knowledge and the Politics of Documentation in Southwesternist Anthropology, 1880-1930
    Secretsharers: Intersecting Systems of Knowledge and the Politics of Documentation in Southwesternist Anthropology, 1880-1930 by Adam Fulton Johnson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in the University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Professor Howard Brick (Co-Chair) Associate Professor John Carson (Co-Chair) Professor Philip Deloria, Harvard University Associate Professor Elizabeth F. S. Roberts Assistant Professor Joy Rohde Adam Fulton Johnson [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-5683-8449 © Adam Fulton Johnson 2018 Acknowledgements Some relationships need not be documented and publicized. But other forms should: in particular, acknowledgements for contributions to my intellectual and personal life. I should first recognize the diligence, candor and encouragement of my brilliant dissertation co-chairs, Howard Brick and John Carson. Not everyone is lucky enough to find inspiring and supportive advisors. Phil Deloria, who joined the project late and without much proof that I had anything to say, gave important feedback and has shaped the future of this project at the book level. Liz Roberts and Joy Rohde, also dissertation committee members, provided loads of advice and encouragement as the dissertation came to a close. I want to expressly thank other friends and colleagues from my time in the University of Michigan’s History Department: Robyn d’Avignon, Juanita Bernal, Secil Binboga, Allison Caine, Abigail Celis, Kevin Donovan, Shannon Dowd, Kimberly Harn, Zehra Hashmi, Drew Haxby, Gabriel Horowitz, Rachel Miller, Davide Orsini, Emma Park, Andres Pletch, Amanda Reid, Richard Reinhardt, and Nik Sweet. Brenden Beck, Michael Casper, and I found ourselves in doctoral programs at the same time, though at different institutions.
    [Show full text]