Environment and Food Production in Papua New Guinea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pandanus Ific Food Leaflet N° Pac 6 ISSN 1018-0966
A publication of the Healthy Pacific Lifestyle Section of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community Pandanus ificifoodileafieiin° Pac i6 ISSN 1018-0966 n parts of the central and northern Pacific, pandanus is a popular food item used in a variety of interesting ways. However, on many other IPacific Islands, pandanus is not well-known as a food. There are many varieties of pandanus, but only In Kiribati, pandanus is called the ‘tree of life’ as it some have edible fruits and nuts. The plants have provides food, shelter and medicine. In the Marshall a distinctive shape and the near-coastal species, Islands, it is called the ‘divine tree’, like coconut, Pandanus tectorius, is found on most Pacific Islands. because of its important role in everyday life. Pandanus The bunches of fruit have many sections called ‘keys’, is also an important staple food in the Federated States which weigh from around 60 to 200 grams each. of Micronesia (FSM), Tuvalu, Tokelau and Papua New (The botanical term for these keys is phalanges, which Guinea. Dried pandanus was once an important food means ‘finger bones’.) People often eat the keys raw, for voyagers on outrigger canoes, enabling seafarers of but the juicy pulp can also be extracted and cooked long ago to survive long journeys. or preserved. The nuts of some varieties are also eaten. In some countries, a number of pandanus varieties are conserved in genebank collections. This leaflet focuses on the Pandanus tectorius species of pandanus. However, other species, such as The pandanus plant plays an important role in Pandanus conoideus and Pandanus jiulianettii, which everyday life in the Pacific. -
422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues. -
Introduction
Introduction R. Michael Bourke and Bryant Allen Agriculture is the most important activity carried together in a single publication where it would be out by the vast majority of Papua New Guineans. easy to access. It began as a compendium of statistics For most people, agriculture fills their lives, but has evolved into a comprehensive book of 72 physically, culturally, economically, socially and sections on PNG agriculture and related topics. The nutritionally. Yet agriculture is the most undervalued number of sections alone demonstrates how agricul- and misunderstood part of PNG life (see Twenty ture pervades almost every aspect of life in PNG. myths about PNG agriculture, page 1). The reasons Sections include information about population; for this are partly because mineral and oil exports land use; climate and other aspects of the physical make PNG comparatively wealthy for a developing environment in which agriculture occurs; overviews country; partly because agriculture is practised in of subsistence food production, with detailed the countryside, away from towns, and is therefore descriptions of production techniques and the most largely ‘invisible’ to urban people and international important food crops; descriptions of cash crop visitors; and partly because agriculture is viewed as production for both domestic and export markets; not being ‘modern’. agriculture in the broader economy; and a series of However, as this book shows, agriculture feeds most papers on agricultural development, policies and Papua New Guineans, houses them, provides a governance. An overview of 50 000 years of agricul- significant amount of food to townspeople and earns tural history in PNG follows this introduction. -
Ecological and Ethnobotanical Facet of 'Kelapa Hutan' (Pandanus Spp
OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Botany ISSN 1811-9700 DOI: 10.3923/ijb.2017.103.114 Research Article Ecological and Ethnobotanical Facet of ‘Kelapa Hutan’ (Pandanus Spp.) and Perspectives Towards its Existence and Benefit 1Krisma Lekitoo, 2Hans Fence Zakeus Peday, 2Novita Panambe and 2Reinardus Liborius Cabuy 1Manokwari Environmental and Forest Research Development Institute, 98314 Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia 2Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Gunung Salju St., Amban, 98314 Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia Abstract Background and Objective: Pandanus species are spread across the tropical New Guinea Forest and have long been extracted for food. In this study, the ecological and ethnobotanical aspects of Pandanus spp. were investigated. The objectives of the study were to highlight types of edible Pandanus spp. through their taxonomical characteristics, ecological distribution and fruit properties and to describe how traditional communities manage their existence and traditional values by way of ethnobotany and conservation. Methodology: To identify the potency and distribution of the edible Pandanus, continuous strip-sampling was applied to the sampling plots with an intensity of 5%. Temperature and humidity were measured directly under trees. The edible Pandanus specimens were identified by key experts and identification books. The thermogravimetric and Kjeldahl methods were implemented to identify nutrient contents. A semi-structural interview was implemented, which included questions on the management of Pandanus fruit and its social status among communities. Pearson’s correlation analysis was implemented to identify any relationship between temperature, humidity and fruit productivity. This analysis was performed using R statistical program. Results: Two edible Pandanus species were identified based on each characteristic: Pandanus brosimos Merr. -
Table 2. Archaeobotanical Table Listing Edible Plants Documented from Late Pleistocene to Mid- Holocene Contexts at Kuk (Adapted from Denham Et Al
Table 2. Archaeobotanical table listing edible plants documented from Late Pleistocene to mid- Holocene contexts at Kuk (adapted from Denham et al. 2003: Table S3). Only food plants are considered, although other uses would have been important in the past (cf. Powell 1976). Species/Genus1 Exploited Edible Archaeobotanical Earliest Form2 Part(s)3 Evidence4 Record Abelmoschus sp. 5 c l, sh s pre-P1 Acalypha sp. w, t l s, p pre-P1 Castanopsis sp. w, t n w, p? pre-P1 Cerastium sp. w ps pre-P1 Coleus sp. w ls pre-P1 Ficus cf. copiosa5 c, w f, l s pre-P1 Ficus spp. c, w l, f w pre-P1 Garcinia sp. w f, l, b w pre-P1 Hydrocotyle sp. w l? s pre-P1 Lycopodium spp. w sh p pre-P1 Maesa sp. w f s, w pre-P1 Musaceae c, w f, c ph, st pre-P1 Oenanthe javanica c, w l, sh p pre-P1 Pandanus antaresensis w dp pre-P1 Pandanus brosimos c, w d p pre-P1 Pandanus spp. c, w d s, p pre-P1 Parsonsia sp. w np pre-P1 Phragmites karka w l, r, sh ph pre-P1 Pouzolzia hirta w l, st s pre-P1 Rubus moluccanus w fs pre-P1 Rubus rosifolius w fs pre-P1 cf. Setaria palmifolia c, w s ph pre-P1 Solanum nigrum c, w l, sh s pre-P1 Syzygium sp. w f w pre-P1 cf. Zingiberaceae c, w r, l, sh ph pre-P1 Colocasia esculenta c c, l st P1 Elaeocarpaceae w np P1 Species/Genus1 Exploited Edible Archaeobotanical Earliest Form2 Part(s)3 Evidence4 Record Ipomoea sp. -
Bioactive Components of Pandan's Fruits from Jayawijaya Mountains
IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT) e-ISSN: 2319-2402,p- ISSN: 2319-2399.Volume 8, Issue 8 Ver. I (Aug. 2014), PP 01-08 www.iosrjournals.org Bioactive Components of Pandan’s Fruits from Jayawijaya Mountains, Papua, Indonesia Been Kogoya1), Bambang Guritno2) Ariffin2) and Agus Suryanto 2) 1(Graduate School of Agriculture, Department of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia) 2(Department of Agriculture, University of Brawijaya, Malang, East Java, Indonesia) Abstract: Five Pandan species, namely Pandanus julianettii, Pandanus iwen, Pandanus brosimos, Pandanus sp.1 (owadak) and Pandanus sp.2 (woromo) from Jaya Wijaya Mountains, Papua have potential bioactive components. This study aimed to identify the bioactive components in Pandan’s fleshy receptacle and seed from five Pandan species. Samples were obtained from fleshy receptacle and seed. Sample were mashed and dried for further proximate, minerals, and vitamins contents analysis. The study revealed that nutritive value compositions of food fiber per 100 grams in fleshy receptacle and seed of Pandanus julianettii were 23% and 12%; those of Pandanus sp.1 (owadak) were 17.59% and 18.38%; those of Pandanus sp.2 (woromo) were 30% and 23%; those of Pandanus iwen were 18% and 30%; those of Pandanus brosimos were 47.75 % and 17.40%. The nutritive value compositions of starch per 100 grams in pandan’s fleshy receptacle and seed of Pandanus julianettii were 23 ppm and 0.24 ppm; those of Pandanus sp.1 (owadak) were 26 ppm and 0.96 ppm; those of Pandanus sp.2 (woromo) were 36 ppm and 18 ppm; those of Pandanus iwen were 21 ppm and 0.21 ppm; those of Pandanus brosimos were 35.88 ppm and 9.67 ppm. -
History of Agriculture in Papua New Guinea
History of agriculture in Papua New Guinea R. Michael Bourke sweet potato about 300 years ago; permanent settle- Introduction ment by Europeans and other outsiders, with many introductions of plants and animals after 1870; and the period of rapid social and economic change that The history of agriculture in PNG is about 10 000 commenced about 70 years ago in 1940. years old. This history is reviewed here in the context of 50 000 years of human occupation of the Australia – New Guinea region. 1 More is known about what The peopling of New Guinea has happened nearer to the present, especially since 1870, than about the distant past. Much of the early history (prehistory) of PNG was unknown until When the first humans came to New Guinea about about 50 years ago, but since 1959 there has been 50 000 years ago the climate was very different a lot of research on the prehistory of PNG, with a from now. Worldwide, temperatures were lower, major focus on agriculture. However, this is a rapidly the polar ice caps were larger, glaciers were more evolving field of study and our understanding of common, and sea levels were lower. As a result, the the history of agriculture in PNG is still incomplete. South-East Asia mainland extended as far east as The information that is summarised here will be Bali and Borneo to form a landmass that is known expanded and modified by future research. as Sunda. The Asian mainland (Sunda) and New Historical evidence is reviewed in a number of Guinea were always separated by ocean but, at that periods: the arrival of humans in New Guinea some time, New Guinea was not an island, but formed the 50 000 years ago; the beginnings of agriculture about northern part of a large continent that also included 10 000 years ago; the appearance of Austronesian- Australia and Tasmania, known as Sahul (Figure 1). -
Agriculture in Papua New Guinea: Conditions, Future Prospects and Dispelling Some Myths
INSTITUTE OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS Speech Series No. 19 2009 Agriculture in Papua New Guinea: Conditions, Future Prospects and Dispelling some Myths By Dr Mike Bourke Australian National University July 2009 First published July 2009 Published by: Institute of National Affairs PO Box 1530, Port Moresby NCD Papua New Guinea Copyright © 2009 Institute of National Affairs ISBN 9980-77-162-3 National Library Service – Papua New Guinea Demographic Background • The estimated mid-2008 population for Papua New Guinea was 6.5 million • This consisted of: • 81% rural villagers (5.3 million people) • 13% urban (0.8 million people) • 6% rural non-village (0.4 million people) • Population growth rate is 2.7% pa (1980-2000) Population Altitude Rural Villagers • Based on cash income and other measures, rural villagers may be further sub-divided into: • Not poor - 39% (2.1 million in mid-2008) • Marginally poor 42% (2.2 million in mid-2008) • Extremely poor 18% (1.0 million in mid-2008) • It is people in the first group and some in the second group which produces most of the cash crops and have the highest consumption rate for imported goods. Land use in PNG • In 1975, only 26% of PNG's mass was used for agriculture (fallows, food gardens, tree crops) • This figure has grown to about 30% now • The remaining 70% has never been used for agriculture • This is because it is too swampy, too steep, rainfall and cloud cover are excessive, or it is too high (above 2800 m altitude) • Even within the 30% that can be used for agriculture, there are often severe limitations. -
Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory
United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D. -
NOP Sample Taxonomy ‐ 11/23/16
NOP Sample Taxonomy ‐ 11/23/16 NOP Scope Top level of Taxonomy is Crops, Livestock, Wild Crops, Handling. NOP Category An optional category for reporting that will only be used to improve search funtionality and utility (not certification relevant). NOP Item Name An optional level for reporting that provides additional detail ‐ general item names such as apples, pears, etc. that can be used to improve search functionality and data quality. Other Item A place to enter individual items or a comma‐separated list of items if no specific NOP Item Name or ID is selected. Item Varieties A place to enter individual varieties or a comma‐separated list of item varieties if an NOP Item Name or NOP Item ID is selected, or a single Other Item is entered. This may include specific products. NOP Scope NOP Category NOP Item Name CROPS Fruit ‐ Berries Acai Berries Aronia Berries Bayberries Bearberries Berries Bilberries Blackberries Blueberries Boysenberries Buffaloberries Cane Berries Capers Cranberries Currants Elderberries Goji Berries Grapes Huckleberries Lychee Mulberries Raspberries Strawberries Other Fruit ‐ Tropical Fruits Abiu Ackee Aizen Aguaymanto Ambarella Araza Avocados Babacos Bananas Breadfruits Coconuts Dates Dragonfruits Durians 1 Feijoas Figs Jackfruits Kiwis Longans Mangos Naranjillas Neems Noni Papayas Passionfruits Pineapples Plantains Pomegranates Rambutans Starfruits Tropical Fruits Other Fruit ‐ Citrus Fruits Calamondins Citrons Citrus Clementines Grapefruits Guavas Kumquats Lemons Limes Loquats Lucuma Mandarins Mangosteen Oranges -
CAUTION / PRECAUCIÓN Si Usted No Entiende La Etiqueta, Busque a Alguien Para Que Se La Explique a Usted En Detalle
PEEL HERE TO OPEN GROUP 19 FUNGICIDE For control or suppression of listed diseases on cucurbit vegetables, citrus fruit group, fruiting vegetables, ginseng*, grapes, hops, pome fruits, root and tuber vegetables, leafy vegetable group, berry and small fruit, strawberries, stone fruits, pomegranates, tree nuts, stalk, stem and leaf petiole vegetable group, and non- bearing vine fruit and fruit and nut trees grown in interiorscapes. ACTIVE INGREDIENT: % BY WT. Polyoxin D zinc salt . 11 .3% OTHER INGREDIENTS: . 88 .7% TOTAL: . 100 .0% KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN CAUTION / PRECAUCIÓN Si usted no entiende la etiqueta, busque a alguien para que se la explique a usted en detalle. (If you do not understand this label, find someone to explain it to you in detail.) See front Panel for First Aid instructions and Booklet for Complete Precautionary Statements and Directions for Use For Product Use Information Call 1-866-761-9397 Produced For: EPA Reg. No. 66330-56 ARYSTA LIFESCIENCE NORTH AMERICA, LLC EPA Est. No. 067545-AZ-001 15401 Weston Parkway, Suite 150 072617V006 Cary, NC 27513 102967-F(0219) *Not registered for use in California NET CONTENTS: 2 POUNDS FIRST AID IF ON SKIN OR • Take off contaminated clothing . CLOTHING: • Rinse skin immediately with plenty of water for 15-20 minutes . • Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice . IF IN EYES: • Hold eye open and rinse slowly and gently with water for 15-20 minutes . Remove contact lenses, if present, after the first 5 minutes, then continue rinsing . • Call a poison control center or doctor for treatment advice . -
Environmental Protection Agency § 180.41
Environmental Protection Agency § 180.41 to result in residues in a processed com- paya, pawpaw, peanut, persimmon, modity at a higher concentration than in the pineapple, water chestnut, and water- representative commodity. Residue data are cress. required on raw commodities derived from the crops in the crop group tolerance but not (c) Each group is identified by a directly covered by the tolerance. Animal group name and consists of a list of feeding studies with a representative crop representative commodities followed are required if the representative crop is by a list of all commodity members for used as a significant animal feed. the group. If the group includes sub- groups, each subgroup lists the sub- * * * * * group name, the representative com- modity or commodities, and the mem- § 180.41 Crop group tables. ber commodities for the subgroup. Sub- (a) The tables in this section are to groups, which are a subset of their as- be used in conjunction with § 180.40 to sociated crop group, are established for establish crop group tolerances. some but not all crops groups. (b) Commodities not listed are not (1) Crop Group 1: Root and Tuber considered as included in the groups for Vegetables Group. the purposes of this paragraph, and in- (i) Representative commodities. Carrot, dividual tolerances must be estab- potato, radish, and sugar beet. lished. Miscellaneous commodities in- (ii) Table. The following table 1 lists tentionally not included in any group all the commodities included in Crop include asparagus, avocado, banana, Group 1 and identifies the related crop fig, globe artichoke, hops, mango, pa- subgroups.