Papua New Guinea Papua New Guinea
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
AP-42, CH 9.10.2.2: Peanut Processing
9.10.2.2 Peanut Processing 9.10.2.2.1 General Peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), also known as groundnuts or goobers, are an annual leguminous herb native to South America. The peanut peduncle, or peg (the stalk that holds the flower), elongates after flower fertilization and bends down into the ground, where the peanut seed matures. Peanuts have a growing period of approximately 5 months. Seeding typically occurs mid-April to mid-May, and harvesting during August in the United States. Light, sandy loam soils are preferred for peanut production. Moderate rainfall of between 51 and 102 centimeters (cm) (20 and 40 inches [in.]) annually is also necessary. The leading peanut producing states are Georgia, Alabama, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Florida, and Oklahoma. 9.10.2.2.2 Process Description The initial step in processing is harvesting, which typically begins with the mowing of mature peanut plants. Then the peanut plants are inverted by specialized machines, peanut inverters, that dig, shake, and place the peanut plants, with the peanut pods on top, into windrows for field curing. After open-air drying, mature peanuts are picked up from the windrow with combines that separate the peanut pods from the plant using various thrashing operations. The peanut plants are deposited back onto the fields and the pods are accumulated in hoppers. Some combines dig and separate the vines and stems from the peanut pods in 1 step, and peanuts harvested by this method are cured in storage. Some small producers still use traditional harvesting methods, plowing the plants from the ground and manually stacking them for field curing. -
Canarium Ovatum) Shells
International Journal of Engineering Research And Management (IJERM) ISSN: 2349- 2058, Volume-04, Issue-09, September 2017 Physical and Mechanical Properties of Particleboard Utilizing Pili Nut (Canarium Ovatum) Shells Ariel B. Morales are widely used for various purposes. It is a lightweight and Abstract— This study aims to make a 200 mm x 200 mm strong kind of plastic that can be easily remolded into particleboard with nine millimeter thickness using Crushed Pili different shapes [5]. This study also helps in lessening Nut Shells (CPNS) and sawdust as raw materials with the ratios non-biodegradable wastes and be useful as a resin. This study (CPNS: sawdust) 100:0, 75:25, and 50:50 by weight and determine their physical and mechanical properties. Also, the specifically aims the following objectives: results were compared to the standard properties of commercial • To determine its physical property such as density, unit particleboard set classified by the Philippine Standard weight and thickness swelling, Association (PHILSA). The raw materials were mixed with • To determine the mechanical property, specifically High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) as an adhesive. All Modulus of Rupture (MOR). particleboards have passed and exceeded the PHILSA standard • To compare the results to the standard properties for for particle board where 100:0 mixtures with density of 1204.09 kg/m3 has the highest MOR of 110 MPa and lowest thickness commercial particleboard from Philippine Standard swelling of 1.11%. Therefore, particleboard made from Pili nut Association (PHILSA) if it will pass or exceed the given shells has an outstanding property compared to commercial standards. particleboards that depends on its application. -
Survey of Roadside Alien Plants in Hawai`I Volcanoes National Park and Adjacent Residential Areas 2001–2005
Technical Report HCSU-032 SURVEY OF ROADSIDE ALIEN PLANts IN HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS 2001–2005 Linda W. Pratt1 Keali`i F. Bio2 James D. Jacobi1 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Kilauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 2 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, P.O. Box 44, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 September 2012 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CA03WRAG0036 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-032 SURVEY OF ROADSIDE ALIEN PLANTS IN HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK AND ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS 2001–2005 1 2 1 LINDA W. PRATT , KEALI`I F. BIO , AND JAMES D. JACOBI 1 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Kīlauea Field Station, P.O. Box 44, Hawai`i Volcanoes National Park, HI 96718 2 Hawaii Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawai`i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 Hawai`i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai`i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 September 2012 This article has been peer reviewed and approved for publication consistent with USGS Fundamental Science Practices ( http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1367/ ). Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. -
Pandanus Ific Food Leaflet N° Pac 6 ISSN 1018-0966
A publication of the Healthy Pacific Lifestyle Section of the Secretariat of the Pacific Community Pandanus ificifoodileafieiin° Pac i6 ISSN 1018-0966 n parts of the central and northern Pacific, pandanus is a popular food item used in a variety of interesting ways. However, on many other IPacific Islands, pandanus is not well-known as a food. There are many varieties of pandanus, but only In Kiribati, pandanus is called the ‘tree of life’ as it some have edible fruits and nuts. The plants have provides food, shelter and medicine. In the Marshall a distinctive shape and the near-coastal species, Islands, it is called the ‘divine tree’, like coconut, Pandanus tectorius, is found on most Pacific Islands. because of its important role in everyday life. Pandanus The bunches of fruit have many sections called ‘keys’, is also an important staple food in the Federated States which weigh from around 60 to 200 grams each. of Micronesia (FSM), Tuvalu, Tokelau and Papua New (The botanical term for these keys is phalanges, which Guinea. Dried pandanus was once an important food means ‘finger bones’.) People often eat the keys raw, for voyagers on outrigger canoes, enabling seafarers of but the juicy pulp can also be extracted and cooked long ago to survive long journeys. or preserved. The nuts of some varieties are also eaten. In some countries, a number of pandanus varieties are conserved in genebank collections. This leaflet focuses on the Pandanus tectorius species of pandanus. However, other species, such as The pandanus plant plays an important role in Pandanus conoideus and Pandanus jiulianettii, which everyday life in the Pacific. -
Trailer Decontamination)
Preventing Peanut Cross-Contamination in Georgia Pecans (Trailer Decontamination) Peanut cross contamination within the pecan industry is a serious concern. One potential source of cross-contamination within the Georgia pecan industry is the use of trailers previously used in peanut harvest for transport of pecans during pecan harvest. Sixty three percent of all food-allergen related deaths in the U.S. are the result of peanut allergies. These allergies result from allergenic proteins found in the peanut kernel. If pecan growers were to use trailers which previously held peanuts during pecan harvest, the potential would exist for the pecans to be contaminated with peanut allergens through peanut oil residue left on the surface of the trailer or through left-over peanuts still remaining in the trailer from peanut harvest. If contaminated pecans were to be processed in a shelling plant, the entire shelling plant itself could become contaminated. Ultimately, a peanut allergin-related death traced back to the consumption of peanut contaminated pecans could have a devastating effect upon the Georgia pecan industry. Therefore, before pecans are dumped into trailers at harvest, the following steps are suggested for decontaminating trailers that may have previously been used in peanut harvest: 1. Clean & sweep trailer thoroughly, assuring that all previous products are removed from trailer. 2. Wash trailer with soap & water solution, making sure all surfaces are scrubbed well with a brush. Use any FDA approved food grade detergents. 3. Rinse trailer out thoroughly with water making sure there are no visual signs of cleaning solution left inside. 4. Sanitize inside of trailer with at least 50 ppm chlorine water solution. -
422 Part 180—Tolerances and Ex- Emptions for Pesticide
Pt. 180 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) at any time before the filing of the ini- 180.124 Methyl bromide; tolerances for resi- tial decision. dues. 180.127 Piperonyl butoxide; tolerances for [55 FR 50293, Dec. 5, 1990, as amended at 70 residues. FR 33360, June 8, 2005] 180.128 Pyrethrins; tolerances for residues. 180.129 o-Phenylphenol and its sodium salt; PART 180—TOLERANCES AND EX- tolerances for residues. 180.130 Hydrogen Cyanide; tolerances for EMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEM- residues. ICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD 180.132 Thiram; tolerances for residues. 180.142 2,4-D; tolerances for residues. Subpart A—Definitions and Interpretative 180.145 Fluorine compounds; tolerances for Regulations residues. 180.151 Ethylene oxide; tolerances for resi- Sec. dues. 180.1 Definitions and interpretations. 180.153 Diazinon; tolerances for residues. 180.3 Tolerances for related pesticide chemi- 180.154 Azinphos-methyl; tolerances for resi- cals. dues. 180.4 Exceptions. 180.155 1-Naphthaleneacetic acid; tolerances 180.5 Zero tolerances. for residues. 180.6 Pesticide tolerances regarding milk, 180.163 Dicofol; tolerances for residues. eggs, meat, and/or poultry; statement of 180.169 Carbaryl; tolerances for residues. policy. 180.172 Dodine; tolerances for residues. 180.175 Maleic hydrazide; tolerances for resi- Subpart B—Procedural Regulations dues. 180.176 Mancozeb; tolerances for residues. 180.7 Petitions proposing tolerances or ex- 180.178 Ethoxyquin; tolerances for residues. emptions for pesticide residues in or on 180.181 Chlorpropham; tolerances for resi- raw agricultural commodities or proc- dues. essed foods. 180.182 Endosulfan; tolerances for residues. 180.8 Withdrawal of petitions without preju- 180.183 Disulfoton; tolerances for residues. -
Introduction
Introduction R. Michael Bourke and Bryant Allen Agriculture is the most important activity carried together in a single publication where it would be out by the vast majority of Papua New Guineans. easy to access. It began as a compendium of statistics For most people, agriculture fills their lives, but has evolved into a comprehensive book of 72 physically, culturally, economically, socially and sections on PNG agriculture and related topics. The nutritionally. Yet agriculture is the most undervalued number of sections alone demonstrates how agricul- and misunderstood part of PNG life (see Twenty ture pervades almost every aspect of life in PNG. myths about PNG agriculture, page 1). The reasons Sections include information about population; for this are partly because mineral and oil exports land use; climate and other aspects of the physical make PNG comparatively wealthy for a developing environment in which agriculture occurs; overviews country; partly because agriculture is practised in of subsistence food production, with detailed the countryside, away from towns, and is therefore descriptions of production techniques and the most largely ‘invisible’ to urban people and international important food crops; descriptions of cash crop visitors; and partly because agriculture is viewed as production for both domestic and export markets; not being ‘modern’. agriculture in the broader economy; and a series of However, as this book shows, agriculture feeds most papers on agricultural development, policies and Papua New Guineans, houses them, provides a governance. An overview of 50 000 years of agricul- significant amount of food to townspeople and earns tural history in PNG follows this introduction. -
0=AFRICAN Geosector
2= AUSTRALASIA geosector Observatoire Linguistique Linguasphere Observatory page 123 2=AUSTRALASIA geosector édition princeps foundation edition DU RÉPERTOIRE DE LA LINGUASPHÈRE 1999-2000 THE LINGUASPHERE REGISTER 1999-2000 publiée en ligne et mise à jour dès novembre 2012 published online & updated from November 2012 This geosector covers 223 sets of languages (1167 outer languages, composed of 2258 inner languages) spoken or formerly spoken by communities in Australasia in a geographic sequence from Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands through New Guinea and its adjacent islands, and throughout the Australian mainland to Tasmania. They comprise all languages of Australasia (Oceania) not covered by phylosectors 3=Austronesian or 5=Indo-European. Zones 20= to 24= cover all so-called "Papuan" languages, spoken on Maluku and the Lesser Sunda islands and the New Guinea mainland, which have been previously treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 20= ARAFURA geozone 21= MAMBERAMO geozone 22= MANDANGIC phylozone 23= OWALAMIC phylozone 24= TRANSIRIANIC phylozone Zones 25= to 27= cover all other so-called "Papuan" languages, on the New Guinea mainland, Bismarck archipelago, New Britain, New Ireland and Solomon islands, which have not been treated within the "Trans-New Guinea" hypothesis: 25= CENDRAWASIH geozone 26= SEPIK-VALLEY geozone 27= BISMARCK-SEA geozone Zones 28= to 29= cover all languages spoken traditionally across the Australian mainland, on the offshore Elcho, Howard, Crocodile and Torres Strait islands (excluding Darnley island), and formerly on the island of Tasmania. An "Australian" hypothesis covers all these languages, excluding the extinct and little known languages of Tasmania, comprising (1.) an area of more diffuse and complex relationships in the extreme north, covered here by geozone 28=, and (2.) a more closely related affinity (Pama+ Nyungan) throughout the rest of Australia, covered by 24 of the 25 sets of phylozone 29=. -
Ecological and Ethnobotanical Facet of 'Kelapa Hutan' (Pandanus Spp
OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Botany ISSN 1811-9700 DOI: 10.3923/ijb.2017.103.114 Research Article Ecological and Ethnobotanical Facet of ‘Kelapa Hutan’ (Pandanus Spp.) and Perspectives Towards its Existence and Benefit 1Krisma Lekitoo, 2Hans Fence Zakeus Peday, 2Novita Panambe and 2Reinardus Liborius Cabuy 1Manokwari Environmental and Forest Research Development Institute, 98314 Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia 2Faculty of Forestry, University of Papua, Gunung Salju St., Amban, 98314 Manokwari, West Papua Province, Indonesia Abstract Background and Objective: Pandanus species are spread across the tropical New Guinea Forest and have long been extracted for food. In this study, the ecological and ethnobotanical aspects of Pandanus spp. were investigated. The objectives of the study were to highlight types of edible Pandanus spp. through their taxonomical characteristics, ecological distribution and fruit properties and to describe how traditional communities manage their existence and traditional values by way of ethnobotany and conservation. Methodology: To identify the potency and distribution of the edible Pandanus, continuous strip-sampling was applied to the sampling plots with an intensity of 5%. Temperature and humidity were measured directly under trees. The edible Pandanus specimens were identified by key experts and identification books. The thermogravimetric and Kjeldahl methods were implemented to identify nutrient contents. A semi-structural interview was implemented, which included questions on the management of Pandanus fruit and its social status among communities. Pearson’s correlation analysis was implemented to identify any relationship between temperature, humidity and fruit productivity. This analysis was performed using R statistical program. Results: Two edible Pandanus species were identified based on each characteristic: Pandanus brosimos Merr. -
Frugivory by Introduced Black Rats (Rattus Rattus) Promotes Dispersal of Invasive Plant Seeds
CHAPTER FIVE: FRUGIVORY BY INTRODUCED BLACK RATS (RATTUS RATTUS) PROMOTES DISPERSAL OF INVASIVE PLANT SEEDS Aaron B. Shiels Department of Botany University of Hawaii at Manoa 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, HI. 96822 148 Abstract Oceanic islands have been colonized by numerous non-native and invasive plants and animals. An understanding of the degree to which introduced rats (Rattus spp.) may be spreading or destroying seeds of invasive plants can improve our knowledge of plant- animal interactions, and assist efforts to control invasive species. Feeding trials in which fruits and seeds were offered to wild-caught rats were used to assess the effects of the most common rat, the black rat (R. rattus), on 25 of the most problematic invasive plant species in the Hawaiian Islands. Rats ate pericarps (fruit tissues) and seeds of most species, and the impacts on these plants ranged from potential dispersal of small-seeded (≤ 1.5 mm length) species via gut passage (e.g., Clidemia hirta, Buddleia asiatica, Ficus microcarpa, Miconia calvescens, Rubus rosifolius) to predation where < 15% of the seeds survived (e.g., Bischofia javanica, Casuarina equisetifolia, Prosopis pallida, Setaria palmifolia). Rats consumed proportionally more seed mass of the smaller fruits and seeds than the larger ones, but fruit and seed size did not predict seed survival following rat interactions. Although invasive rat control efforts focus on native species protection, non-native plant species, especially those with small seeds that may pass internally through rats, also deserve rat control in order to help limit the spread of such seeds. Black rats may be facilitating the spread of many of the most problematic invasive plants through frugivory and seed dispersal in Hawaii and in other ecosystems where rats and plants have been introduced. -
Table 2. Archaeobotanical Table Listing Edible Plants Documented from Late Pleistocene to Mid- Holocene Contexts at Kuk (Adapted from Denham Et Al
Table 2. Archaeobotanical table listing edible plants documented from Late Pleistocene to mid- Holocene contexts at Kuk (adapted from Denham et al. 2003: Table S3). Only food plants are considered, although other uses would have been important in the past (cf. Powell 1976). Species/Genus1 Exploited Edible Archaeobotanical Earliest Form2 Part(s)3 Evidence4 Record Abelmoschus sp. 5 c l, sh s pre-P1 Acalypha sp. w, t l s, p pre-P1 Castanopsis sp. w, t n w, p? pre-P1 Cerastium sp. w ps pre-P1 Coleus sp. w ls pre-P1 Ficus cf. copiosa5 c, w f, l s pre-P1 Ficus spp. c, w l, f w pre-P1 Garcinia sp. w f, l, b w pre-P1 Hydrocotyle sp. w l? s pre-P1 Lycopodium spp. w sh p pre-P1 Maesa sp. w f s, w pre-P1 Musaceae c, w f, c ph, st pre-P1 Oenanthe javanica c, w l, sh p pre-P1 Pandanus antaresensis w dp pre-P1 Pandanus brosimos c, w d p pre-P1 Pandanus spp. c, w d s, p pre-P1 Parsonsia sp. w np pre-P1 Phragmites karka w l, r, sh ph pre-P1 Pouzolzia hirta w l, st s pre-P1 Rubus moluccanus w fs pre-P1 Rubus rosifolius w fs pre-P1 cf. Setaria palmifolia c, w s ph pre-P1 Solanum nigrum c, w l, sh s pre-P1 Syzygium sp. w f w pre-P1 cf. Zingiberaceae c, w r, l, sh ph pre-P1 Colocasia esculenta c c, l st P1 Elaeocarpaceae w np P1 Species/Genus1 Exploited Edible Archaeobotanical Earliest Form2 Part(s)3 Evidence4 Record Ipomoea sp. -
(Poaceae: Panicoideae) in Thailand
Systematics of Arundinelleae and Andropogoneae, subtribes Chionachninae, Dimeriinae and Germainiinae (Poaceae: Panicoideae) in Thailand Thesis submitted to the University of Dublin, Trinity College for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) by Atchara Teerawatananon 2009 Research conducted under the supervision of Dr. Trevor R. Hodkinson School of Natural Sciences Department of Botany Trinity College University of Dublin, Ireland I Declaration I hereby declare that the contents of this thesis are entirely my own work (except where otherwise stated) and that it has not been previously submitted as an exercise for a degree to this or any other university. I agree that library of the University of Dublin, Trinity College may lend or copy this thesis subject to the source being acknowledged. _______________________ Atchara Teerawatananon II Abstract This thesis has provided a comprehensive taxonomic account of tribe Arundinelleae, and subtribes Chionachninae, Dimeriinae and Germainiinae of the tribe Andropogoneae in Thailand. Complete floristic treatments of these taxa have been completed for the Flora of Thailand project. Keys to genera and species, species descriptions, synonyms, typifications, illustrations, distribution maps and lists of specimens examined, are also presented. Fourteen species and three genera of tribe Arundinelleae, three species and two genera of subtribe Chionachninae, seven species of subtribe Dimeriinae, and twelve species and two genera of Germainiinae, were recorded in Thailand, of which Garnotia ciliata and Jansenella griffithiana were recorded for the first time for Thailand. Three endemic grasses, Arundinella kerrii, A. kokutensis and Dimeria kerrii were described as new species to science. Phylogenetic relationships among major subfamilies in Poaceae and among major tribes within Panicoideae were evaluated using parsimony analysis of plastid DNA regions, trnL-F and atpB- rbcL, and a nuclear ribosomal DNA region, ITS.