Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: an and Taxonomists Throughout the World Who Have Left Inventory United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research Service of the Tropics Agriculture Handbook No. 642 An Inventory t Abstract Acknowledgments Martin, Franklin W., Carl W. Cannpbell, Ruth M. Puberté. We owe first thanks to the botanists, horticulturists 1987 Perennial Edible Fruits of the Tropics: An and taxonomists throughout the world who have left Inventory. U.S. Department of Agriculture, written records of the fruits they encountered. Agriculture Handbook No. 642, 252 p., illus. Second, we thank Richard A. Hamilton, who read and The edible fruits of the Tropics are nnany in number, criticized the major part of the manuscript. His help varied in form, and irregular in distribution. They can be was invaluable. categorized as major or minor. Only about 300 Tropical fruits can be considered great. These are outstanding We also thank the many individuals who read, criti- in one or more of the following: Size, beauty, flavor, and cized, or contributed to various parts of the book. In nutritional value. In contrast are the more than 3,000 alphabetical order, they are Susan Abraham (Indian fruits that can be considered minor, limited severely by fruits), Herbert Barrett (citrus fruits), Jose Calzada one or more defects, such as very small size, poor taste Benza (fruits of Peru), Clarkson (South African fruits), or appeal, limited adaptability, or limited distribution. William 0. Cooper (citrus fruits), Derek Cormack The major fruits are not all well known. Some excellent (arrangements for review in Africa), Milton de Albu- fruits which rival the commercialized greatest are still querque (Brazilian fruits), Enriquito D. de Guzman relatively unknown in other parts of the Tropics*and (Philippine fruits), R. B. Drummond (African fruits), should be promoted. Introducing new fruits into a Victor Galan Sauco (Canary Island fruits), Charles B. country is often difficult, however, and must be done Heiser (minor South American fruits), L. Antonio Lizana legally. Obtaining information on the fruits and their (South American, especially Chilean, fruits), Raul sources is a first step, and this publication provides Mosqueda Vazquez (Mexican fruits), Sunit K. Mukherjee much of that information. This publication also lists the (Indian fruits), Melicia Munoz (South American, espe- minor fruits as completely as can be done with the cially Chilean, fruits), and Robert K. Soost (citrus fruits). present state of knowledge. Finally, we thank the typist, Migdalia Malave, for her Keywords: major tropical fruits, minor tropical fruits, long hours of dedication. tropical fruit cultivation, tropical fruit distribution, tropical fruit introduction, tropical fruits, tropical fruit utilization Copies of this publication can be purchased from Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Microfiche copies can be purchased from National Technical Information Office 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 Agricultural Research Service has no additional copies for free distribution. United States Department of Agriculture Perennial Edible Fruits Agricultural Research of the Tropics Service An Inventory Agriculture Handbook No. 642 By Franklin W. Martin Tropical Agriculture Research Station Mayaguez, PR Carl W. Campbell University of Florida. TREC Homestead, FL Ruth M. Ruberte Tropical Agriculture Research Station Mayaguez, PR Contents Chapter 1. Introduction 1 2. Major Fruits 12 3. Citrus Fruits and Their Relatives 65 4. Minor Fruits of the Americas 79 5. Minor Fruits of Africa 126 6. Minor Fruits of Australia, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific Islands 178 7. Minor Fruits of the Indian Subcontinent and Adjacent Places 207 8. Fruits Meriting Wider Distribution 220 References 242 Issued April 1987 1. Introduction No class of foods hias as muchi general appeal as What Is a Fruit? fruits. Altfiough they are sometimes ricfi In vitamins, minerals, oils, starcfies, and even proteins, fruits are In the botanical sense, all flowering plants (mono- seldom consciously eaten for their nutritional value but cotyledons and dicotyledons) produce fruits (fig. 1). for their beauty, texture, aroma, juiciness, and refresh- These are the results of reproductive growth, generally ing flavor. Fruits are usually not the main course. They the structures developed from flowers or from clusters are the desserts or the foods to be nibbled or devoured of flowers. Fruits may be only the reproductive organs between meals. of the plant or may include other parts of the flower, such as the receptacle, sepals, and pedicel. We use the How many species of fruits are there in the Tropics?^ word "fruit" in a more restrictive and popular sense. In our opinion there are thousands. Of these, 300 are major and 100 are excellent, but perhaps only 50 are We consider only edible fruits of tropical or subtropical already well known. Many tropical fruits are uni<nown origin. We do not include in this Inventory certain to the temperate palate, and there are many still known Temperate Zone fruits grown in restricted areas of the in only a small part of the Tropics. There remains an Tropics, such as apples, peaches, and pears and their immense task to know, to culture, to Improve, to show, many relatives. Temperate Zone fruits in the Tropics and to share tropical fruits with the world. are generally out of place and insignificant in their impact. But having said this, we realize that certain Temperate Zone fruits—grapes, for example—can be adapted to the Tropics, and we have Included such selections. We have further limited our selection to perennials. Thus, we do not consider the family Cucurbitaceae (fig. 2), although many have sweet fruits occupying the Figure 1,—Botanical fruits of several kinds. iWe define the Tropics as that area betw/een the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capri- corn (the Torrid Zone) w/ith warm day and night temperatures throughout the year. For our purpose we include adjacent areas in the Temperate Zone with this climate (the sub- tropics), and we include highlands with temperate climates in the Torrid Zone. Figure 2.—Fruits of annual herbaceous plants. Chapter 1 same position in ttie diet as any other fruit. On the other hand, we have included fruits of the family ^Itg Solanaceae, although they are borderline by our defini- tion. In addition, some might consider the Solanaceae to be "vegetables," but we could not find, based on use and perception, any such clear-cut distinction. Fruits are often eaten raw, out of hand, but a few are eaten or are edible only when cooked. A cooked botani- cal fruit is often considered a vegetable. We have tried to eliminate botanical fruits that are used more as vegetables (fig. 3). Yet, there were traditional excep- tions, including the breadfruit, clearly a fruit to every- one, yet used only as a vegetable. We have wrestled with the concept of "nut" as opposed to "fruit" and "seed." Botanically, a nut is a hard, in- dehiscent one-seeded fruit (fig. 4). In horticulture, how- ever, many fruits that are considered to be nuts do not fit this definition. Moreover, the exact distinction between seeds and nuts is vague, and we may have in- cluded certain seed-bearing species that others may not consider to be either fruits or nuts. Figure 4. —Nuts and seeds of various kinds. Although edibility was one of our prime criteria for including a selection, there are fruits that are consid- ered edible by some and inedible by others. The dis- tinction is fuzzy, and we cannot resolve the problem. We have preferred to err on the side of being inclusive in these cases. Size was another of our criteria. We have excluded very small fruits that are hardly worth the effort of harvest, except in emergency, but we have included many that are so tasty that their omission would be an error. The task of deciding which fruits to include was com- plicated by taxonomy. We have used the best sources of information available to us, but information is often lacking. For instance, experts are often confused by the variety of forms within broadly distributed species. Whether these forms are distinct species, in the sense that they are reproductively isolated from each other, or are only variants of one or more species often cannot be determined. Errors may also occur when the same form is given two or more names. In many cases we were not able to establish synonymy, and we believed it better to include too many names rather than too few. Figure 3. —Fruits used as cooked vegetables. Introduction Major and Minor Fruits We have segregated the major and minor fruits in sepa- rate chapters because we believe most people will want We have attennpted to classify fruits as major (chapter more information on the major fruits than on the minor 2 and part of 3) and minor (part of 3 and chapters 4-7), fruits. However, with respect to Rutaceae, the citrus often a difficult task. Major fruits have often been intro- family, we have placed major and minor fruits in one duced from one region to another and are frequently chapter because of the intimate relationships among well known. They are usually large, but when small, them and the difficulty of making a clear separation. they are of high quality. They may be marketed inter- nationally, or they may be economically important only Major fruits listed in chapters 2 and 3 are not included in certain regions. On the other hand, they may have in any regional list of minor fruits, even though they little or no economic importance; nonetheless, we have may indeed be minor in some of those. On the other considered them to be major if they are widespread, hand, minor fruits occurring in more than one region well known, or often used. are listed in all appropriate chapters. In contrast, minor fruits are usually not widely distrib- Of the major fruits listed in chapters 2 and 3, we con- uted.
Recommended publications
  • Aiphanes Grandis Borchs
    Palm Conservation – Palm Specialist Group Aiphanes grandis Borchs. & Balslev Status: Endangered (EN) Common name None recorded Natural range Aiphanes grandis is endemic to the western slopes of the Andes mountains in Ecuador, at elevations between 1000 and 2000 m. It occurs in cloud forest in the central and southern parts of the country. Recognition characteristics It is a large, solitary palm tree, with a stem up to 20 m tall and 10–20 cm in diameter. The stem and leaves are fiercely armed with long, black spines. The leaf blade is 200–250 cm long with up to 50 leaflets on each side, briefly jagged at apex, inserted in groups and pointing in different directions. The inflorescence is 1–1.5 m long, with up to 200 spreading branches. Flowers are white to pale yellow and fruits 2–3 cm in diameter, dull green and covered with brown, loosely attached bristles. The combination of jagged leaflets and large size distinguishes the species from all other South American palms. Natural history Little is known about the natural history of the species. The palm heart is edible, and its seeds are sometimes pureed and cooked with crude cane sugar to form a nougat-like paste. Threats to survival The estimated loss of potential habitat for A. grandis, based on habitat modeling, is 62%, most of which has occurred over the last 30–40 years. The west Andean mountain forest in southern and central Ecudor, where A. grandis occurs, harbors a high number of endemic plant species. It is also the home to remnant populations of such conspicuous palm species as Ceroxylon ventricosum and C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fl. China 11: 121–124. 2008. 11. AGLAIA Loureiro, Fl. Cochinch. 1
    Fl. China 11: 121–124. 2008. 11. AGLAIA Loureiro, Fl. Cochinch. 1: 98, 173. 1790, nom. cons., not F. Allamand (1770). 米仔兰属 mi zi lan shu Peng Hua (彭华); Caroline M. Pannell Trees or shrubs, dioecious, young parts usually lepidote or stellately pubescent. Leaves alternate to subopposite, odd-pinnate, 3- foliolate, or rarely simple; leaflet blade margins entire. Flowers in axillary thyrses, small, usually globose. Calyx slightly or deeply 3– 5-lobed. Petals 3–5, short, concave, quincuncial or imbricate in bud, distinct or rarely basally connate and adnate to staminal tube. Stamens as many as or more than petals; staminal tube usually subglobose, obovoid, or cup-shaped with apex incurved, apical margin entire, crenate, or shallowly lobed; anthers 5 or 6(–12), included, slightly exserted, or rarely semiexserted. Disk absent. Ovary 1–3(or 4)-locular, with 1 or 2 ovules per locule; style short or absent; stigma ovoid or shortly cylindric. Fruit with fibrous pericarp, indehiscent with 1 or 2 locules or loculicidally dehiscent with 3 locules; locules without seeds or each containing 1 seed; pericarp often containing latex. Seeds usually surrounded by a colloidal and fleshy aril; endosperm absent. About 120 species: tropical and subtropical Asia, tropical Australia, Pacific islands; eight species in China. Aglaia is the only source of the group of about 50 known representatives of compounds that bear a unique cyclopenta[b]tetrahydrobenzofuran skeleton. These compounds are more commonly called rocaglate or rocaglamide derivatives, or flavaglines, and have been found to have anticancer and pesticidal properties. Since the first representative in this group was only discovered in 1982, this is one of the few recent examples of a completely new class of plant secondary metabolites of biological promise (see B.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 58(1) Mar. 2014 the INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC
    Palms Journal of the International Palm Society Vol. 58(1) Mar. 2014 THE INTERNATIONAL PALM SOCIETY, INC. The International Palm Society Palms (formerly PRINCIPES) Journal of The International Palm Society Founder: Dent Smith The International Palm Society is a nonprofit corporation An illustrated, peer-reviewed quarterly devoted to engaged in the study of palms. The society is inter- information about palms and published in March, national in scope with worldwide membership, and the June, September and December by The International formation of regional or local chapters affiliated with the Palm Society Inc., 9300 Sandstone St., Austin, TX international society is encouraged. Please address all 78737-1135 USA. inquiries regarding membership or information about Editors: John Dransfield, Herbarium, Royal Botanic the society to The International Palm Society Inc., 9300 Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, United Sandstone St., Austin, TX 78737-1135 USA, or by e-mail Kingdom, e-mail [email protected], tel. 44-20- to [email protected], fax 512-607-6468. 8332-5225, Fax 44-20-8332-5278. OFFICERS: Scott Zona, Dept. of Biological Sciences (OE 167), Florida International University, 11200 SW 8 Street, President: Leland Lai, 21480 Colina Drive, Topanga, Miami, Florida 33199 USA, e-mail [email protected], tel. California 90290 USA, e-mail [email protected], 1-305-348-1247, Fax 1-305-348-1986. tel. 1-310-383-2607. Associate Editor: Natalie Uhl, 228 Plant Science, Vice-Presidents: Jeff Brusseau, 1030 Heather Drive, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853 USA, e- Vista, California 92084 USA, e-mail mail [email protected], tel. 1-607-257-0885.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Volume 60
    PALM S Index to Vol. 60 Vol. 60(4) 2016 Index to Volume 60 A new species of Attalea from the Bolivian Attalea crassispatha 97, 113 lowlands 161 Attalea eichleri 111 A university palmetum 93 Attalea exigua 112 Acoelorrhaphe 97 Attalea huebneri 61, 69, 73, 74, 76, 114, Acoelorrhaphe wrightii 25–28, 97 117–119, 123 Acrocomia crispa 97, 113 Attalea insignis 76, 123 Adonidia dransfieldii 15 Attalea macrocarpa 122, 123 Adonidia merrillii 15, 97 Attalea maripa 59, 72, 74, 76 Aiphanes horrida 67, 70, 74, 113 Attalea moorei 58, 59, 62–64, 66–70, 72–74, Aiphanes minima 113 76, 117–121, 123 Aiphanes weberbaueri 72 Attalea osmantha 123 Andriamanantena, A.Z., as co-author 169 Attalea pacensis 162–165, 167 Ali, O.M.M.: The argun palm, Medemia Attalea peruviana 62, 64, 65, 77, 112, 122, argun , in the eastern Nubian Desert of 123 Sudan 145 Attalea phalerata 63, 68, 69, 73–76, 114, Allagoptera 111 117–120, 123, 162, 163, 165, 167 Areca 18 Attalea plowmanii 58, 62–64, 76, 110, 117, Areca catechu 3, 19 123 Arenga 17 Attalea polysticha 64, 65, 76, 112, 116 Arenga caudata 43 Attalea princeps 59, 71, 73, 76, 77, 118, 123, Arenga hookeriana 43 161, 162, 165, 167 Arenga pinnata 97 Attalea racemosa 62, 76 Arenga undulatifolia 97 Attalea rostrata 123 Aspects and causes of earlier and current Attalea salazarii 58, 61, 62 spread of Trachycarpus fortunei in the Attalea septuagenata 76 forests of southern Ticino and northern Attalea speciosa 76 Lago Maggiore (Switzerland, Italy) 125 Attalea tessmannii 59, 62, 64, 76, 113, 121, Astrocaryum 39, 113, 114 122 Astrocaryum carnosum 70 Attalea weberbaueri 59, 66, 67, 72, 73, 77, Astrocaryum faranae 70, 72 111, 112, 114, 119, 121, 123 Astrocaryum gratum 76 Attalea : Insights into the diversity and Astrocaryum huicungo 69 phylogeny of an intriguing genus 109 Astrocaryum perangustatum 72 Bactris 39 Astrocaryum ulei 74 Bactris gasipaes 39 Attalea 9, 11, 12, 18, 21, 39, 57–59, 63, 64, Bactris hirta 74 66, 69, 72, 74, 76, 77, 109–116, 121, Baker, W.J., W.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Scan Data
    Selbyana 15: 132-149 CHECKLIST OF VENEZUELAN BROMELIACEAE WITH NOTES ON SPECIES DISTRIBUTION BY STATE AND LEVELS OF ENDEMISM BRUCE K. HOLST Missouri Botanical Garden, P.O. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, USA ABSTRACf. A checklist of the 24 genera and 364 native species ofBromeliaceae known from Venezuela is presented, including their occurrence by state and indications of which are endemic to the country. A comparison of the number of genera and species known from Mesoamerica (southern Mexico to Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, the Guianas (Guyana, Suriname, French Guiana), Ecuador, and Peru is presented, as well as a summary of the number of species and endemic species in each Venezuelan state. RESUMEN. Se presenta un listado de los 24 generos y 364 especies nativas de Bromeliaceae que se conocen de Venezuela, junto con sus distribuciones por estado y una indicaci6n cuales son endemicas a Venezuela. Se presenta tambien una comparaci6n del numero de los generos y especies de Mesoamerica (sur de Mexico a Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, las Guayanas (Guyana, Suriname, Guyana Francesa), Ecuador, y Peru, y un resumen del numero de especies y numero de especies endemicas de cada estado de Venezuela. INTRODUCTION Bromeliaceae (Smith 1971), and Revision of the Guayana Highland Bromeliaceae (Smith 1986). The checklist ofVenezuelan Bromeliaceae pre­ Several additional country records were reported sented below (Appendix 1) adds three genera in works by Smith and Read (1982), Luther (Brewcaria, Neoregelia, and Steyerbromelia) and (1984), Morillo (1986), and Oliva-Esteva and 71 species to the totals for the country since the Steyermark (1987). Author abbreviations used last summary of Venezuelan bromeliads in the in the checklist follow Brummit and Powell Flora de Venezuela series which contained 293 (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 History of Vitaceae Inferred from Morphology-Based
    HISTORY OF VITACEAE INFERRED FROM MORPHOLOGY-BASED PHYLOGENY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD OF SEEDS By IJU CHEN A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2009 1 © 2009 Iju Chen 2 To my parents and my sisters, 2-, 3-, 4-ju 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Dr. Steven Manchester for providing the important fossil information, sharing the beautiful images of the fossils, and reviewing the dissertation. I thank Dr. Walter Judd for providing valuable discussion. I thank Dr. Hongshan Wang, Dr. Dario de Franceschi, Dr. Mary Dettmann, and Dr. Peta Hayes for access to the paleobotanical specimens in museum collections, Dr. Kent Perkins for arranging the herbarium loans, Dr. Suhua Shi for arranging the field trip in China, and Dr. Betsy R. Jackes for lending extant Australian vitaceous seeds and arranging the field trip in Australia. This research is partially supported by National Science Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grants award number 0608342. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...............................................................................................................4 LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................................9 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................................11 ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Other Article Template 1-2010.Fm
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 22: 69–77, 2011 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society FRUGIVORY AND SEED DISPERSAL BY THE HELMETED MANAKIN (ANTILOPHIA GALEATA) IN FORESTS OF BRAZILIAN CERRADO Adriano M. Silva & Celine de Melo Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, R. Ceará s/n, CEP. 38400-902, Uberlândia - MG, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Resumo. – Frugivoria e dispersão de sementes por soldadinho (Antilophia galeata) em matas do Cerrado brasileiro. – Antilophia galeata é uma ave frugívora da família Pipridae que tem sido registrada como uma boa dispersora de sementes de diversas espécies vegetais do Cerrado. O objetivo do tra- balho foi determinar o comportamento alimentar de A. galeata para avaliar seu potencial de dispersão de sementes em três fragmentos florestais. Foram registradas a tática de captura de frutos, o tempo gasto, o número de frutos consumidos e a espécie do fruto. Capturas com rede neblina foram usadas para coleta de material defecado. Foi registrado o consumo de 16 espécies de plantas, sendo Rubiaceae e Melastomataceae, as famílias mais representativas. As táticas de captura de fruto em vôo foram as mais frequentes, sendo que foram consumidos 3,86 ± 1,52 frutos por minuto em cada visita e em 88% dos registros, os frutos foram engolidos inteiros. No conteúdo fecal foram identificados três morfotipos de sementes. Os dados permitem afirmar que A. galeata é uma espécie importante nas interações frugívoro-planta e na dispersão de sementes. Abstract. – The Helmeted Manakin (Antilophia galeata) is a frugivorous bird of the Pipridae family and has been registered as a good seed disperser for several plants species from Cerrado.
    [Show full text]
  • Review the Conservation Status of West Indian Palms (Arecaceae)
    Oryx Vol 41 No 3 July 2007 Review The conservation status of West Indian palms (Arecaceae) Scott Zona, Rau´l Verdecia, Angela Leiva Sa´nchez, Carl E. Lewis and Mike Maunder Abstract The conservation status of 134 species, sub- ex situ and in situ conservation projects in the region’s species and varieties of West Indian palms (Arecaceae) botanical gardens. We recommend that preliminary is assessed and reviewed, based on field studies and conservation assessments be made of the 25 Data current literature. We find that 90% of the palm taxa of Deficient taxa so that conservation measures can be the West Indies are endemic. Using the IUCN Red List implemented for those facing imminent threats. categories one species is categorized as Extinct, 11 taxa as Critically Endangered, 19 as Endangered, and 21 as Keywords Arecaceae, Caribbean, Palmae, palms, Red Vulnerable. Fifty-seven taxa are classified as Least List, West Indies. Concern. Twenty-five taxa are Data Deficient, an indica- tion that additional field studies are urgently needed. The 11 Critically Endangered taxa warrant immediate This paper contains supplementary material that can conservation action; some are currently the subject of only be found online at http://journals.cambridge.org Introduction Recent phylogenetic work has changed the status of one genus formerly regarded as endemic: Gastrococos is now The islands of the West Indies (the Caribbean Islands shown to be part of the widespread genus Acrocomia sensu Smith et al., 2004), comprising the Greater and (Gunn, 2004). Taking these changes into consideration, Lesser Antilles, along with the Bahamas Archipelago, endemism at the generic level is 14%.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Vitaceae Based on Plastid Sequence Data
    PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF VITACEAE BASED ON PLASTID SEQUENCE DATA by PAUL NAUDE Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER SCIENTAE in BOTANY in the FACULTY OF SCIENCE at the UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG SUPERVISOR: DR. M. VAN DER BANK December 2005 I declare that this dissertation has been composed by myself and the work contained within, unless otherwise stated, is my own Paul Naude (December 2005) TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Abstract iii Index of Figures iv Index of Tables vii Author Abbreviations viii Acknowledgements ix CHAPTER 1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Vitaceae 1 1.2 Genera of Vitaceae 6 1.2.1 Vitis 6 1.2.2 Cayratia 7 1.2.3 Cissus 8 1.2.4 Cyphostemma 9 1.2.5 Clematocissus 9 1.2.6 Ampelopsis 10 1.2.7 Ampelocissus 11 1.2.8 Parthenocissus 11 1.2.9 Rhoicissus 12 1.2.10 Tetrastigma 13 1.3 The genus Leea 13 1.4 Previous taxonomic studies on Vitaceae 14 1.5 Main objectives 18 CHAPTER 2 MATERIALS AND METHODS 21 2.1 DNA extraction and purification 21 2.2 Primer trail 21 2.3 PCR amplification 21 2.4 Cycle sequencing 22 2.5 Sequence alignment 22 2.6 Sequencing analysis 23 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 3 RESULTS 32 3.1 Results from primer trail 32 3.2 Statistical results 32 3.3 Plastid region results 34 3.3.1 rpL 16 34 3.3.2 accD-psa1 34 3.3.3 rbcL 34 3.3.4 trnL-F 34 3.3.5 Combined data 34 CHAPTER 4 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS 42 4.1 Molecular evolution 42 4.2 Morphological characters 42 4.3 Previous taxonomic studies 45 4.4 Conclusions 46 CHAPTER 5 REFERENCES 48 APPENDIX STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DATA 59 ii ABSTRACT Five plastid regions as source for phylogenetic information were used to investigate the relationships among ten genera of Vitaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxanomic Composition and Conservation Status of Plants in Imbak Canyon, Sabah, Malaysia
    Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation 16: 79–100, 2019 ISSN 1823-3902 E-ISSN 2550-1909 Short Notes Taxanomic Composition and Conservation Status of Plants in Imbak Canyon, Sabah, Malaysia Elizabeth Pesiu1*, Reuben Nilus2, John Sugau2, Mohd. Aminur Faiz Suis2, Petrus Butin2, Postar Miun2, Lawrence Tingkoi2, Jabanus Miun2, Markus Gubilil2, Hardy Mangkawasa3, Richard Majapun2, Mohd Tajuddin Abdullah1,4 1Institute of Tropical Biodiversity and Sustainable Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu 2Forest Research Centre, Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, Sabah, Malaysia 3 Maliau Basin Conservation Area, Yayasan Sabah 4Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030, Kuala Terengganu *Corresponding authors: [email protected] Abstract A study of plant diversity and their conservation status was conducted in Batu Timbang, Imbak Canyon Conservation Area (ICCA), Sabah. The study aimed to document plant diversity and to identify interesting, endemic, rare and threatened plant species which were considered high conservation value species. A total of 413 species from 82 families were recorded from the study area of which 93 taxa were endemic to Borneo, including 10 endemic to Sabah. These high conservation value species are key conservation targets for any forested area such as ICCA. Proper knowledge of plant diversity and their conservation status is vital for the formulation of a forest management plan for the Batu Timbang area. Keywords: Vascular plant, floral diversity, endemic, endangered, Borneo Introduction The earth as it is today has a lot of important yet beneficial natural resources such as tropical forests. Tropical forests are one of the world’s richest ecosystems, providing a wide range of important natural resources comprising vital biotic and abiotic components (Darus, 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands
    SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Contributions from the United States National Herbarium Volume 52: 1-415 Monocotyledons and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands Editors Pedro Acevedo-Rodríguez and Mark T. Strong Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 2005 ABSTRACT Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro and Mark T. Strong. Monocots and Gymnosperms of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium, volume 52: 415 pages (including 65 figures). The present treatment constitutes an updated revision for the monocotyledon and gymnosperm flora (excluding Orchidaceae and Poaceae) for the biogeographical region of Puerto Rico (including all islets and islands) and the Virgin Islands. With this contribution, we fill the last major gap in the flora of this region, since the dicotyledons have been previously revised. This volume recognizes 33 families, 118 genera, and 349 species of Monocots (excluding the Orchidaceae and Poaceae) and three families, three genera, and six species of gymnosperms. The Poaceae with an estimated 89 genera and 265 species, will be published in a separate volume at a later date. When Ackerman’s (1995) treatment of orchids (65 genera and 145 species) and the Poaceae are added to our account of monocots, the new total rises to 35 families, 272 genera and 759 species. The differences in number from Britton’s and Wilson’s (1926) treatment is attributed to changes in families, generic and species concepts, recent introductions, naturalization of introduced species and cultivars, exclusion of cultivated plants, misdeterminations, and discoveries of new taxa or new distributional records during the last seven decades.
    [Show full text]