PEACE Info (January 17, 2019)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PEACE Info (January 17, 2019) PEACE Info (January 17, 2019) − Negotiations conducted to call PPST meeting − Tatmadaw to meet RCSS in February − The New Year Starts With Armed Conflict Between Karen and Burma Armies in Northern Karen State − Shan Forces Clash in Hsipaw Township − Hsipaw Locals Alarmed by Gunshots Near Village − IDPs sheltering at Narmakhaw monastery can't go back homes yet − Arakan Army Chief Promises Myanmar Military, Govt Eye For an Eye − Renewed fighting between AA and Myanmar military injures two youths − Clash breaks out between Tatmadaw and AA near borderline − Border Guard Police Wounded in Rakhine Rebel Ambush: Myanmar Army − Brothers Injured by Artillery Shell in Northern Rakhine − Myanmar seizes illegal drugs in northeastern state − KIO ဥကၠ႒ႏွင့္ ကခ်င္မ်ိဳးႏြယ္စု ေခါင္းေဆာင္မ်ား လိုင္ဇာ၌ေတြ႕ဆံု၍ ၿငိမ္းခ်မ္းေရးဆုိင္ရာမ်ား ေဆြးေႏြး − ကခ်င္ႏိုင္ငံေတာ္ထူေထာင္ဖို႔ ျပည္ပေရာက္ ကခ်င္ညီလာခံ ဆံုးျဖတ္ − လြတ္လပ္ေသာ ကခ်င္ႏုိင္ငံတည္ေထာင္ရန္ ဆံုးျဖတ္သည့္ ခ်င္းမိုင္ကခ်င္လူမ်ိဳးမ်ား ညီလာခံသို႔ KIO မတက္ − ရွမ္းတပ္မ်ားအၾကား သီေပါၿမိဳ႔နယ္အတြင္း တိုုက္ပြဲမ်ား ဆက္လက္ျဖစ္ပြား − ရထားလမ္းစီမံကိန္း TNLA က တ႐ုတ္ႏွင့္ေဆြးေႏြးလို − AA ရကၡိဳင့္တပ္မေတာ္ေတာင္းဆုိထားတဲ့ Confederate မူအေပၚသုံးသပ္ခ်က္ − ေအေအအဖဲြ႔၏ ယာယီစခန္းတခု သိမ္းပုိက္ရရွိဟု တပ္မေတာ္ထုတ္ျပန္ − ယာယီစခန္းတစ္ခုကိုသိမ္းပိုက္ရရွိေၾကာင္း တပ္မေတာ္၏သတင္းထုတ္ျပန္ခ်က္အေပၚ AA တုန႔္ျပန္ − AA စခန္းသိမ္းခံရမႈ တပ္မေတာ္ထုတ္ျပန္ခ်က္ AA ျငင္းဆန္ − ေမာင္ေတာပစ္ခတ္မႈတြင္ ရဲတပ္ဖြဲ႕ဝင္ ၆ ဦး ဒဏ္ရာရ − ရခိုင္က စစ္ေဘးဒုကၡသည္ေတြကို အကူအညီေပးခြင့္ျပဳဖို႔ MSF အဖြဲ႕ ေတာင္းဆို − ရခိုင္ျပည္နယ္ရွိ စစ္ေဘးေရွာင္မ်ားအား ေဆးကုသမွုဆိုင္ရာ အကူအညီေပးရန္ နယ္စည္းမထား ဆရာဝန္မ်ားအဖြဲ႕ (MSF) က က်န္းမာေရး ဝန္ႀကီးဌာနထံ ကမ္းလွမ္း − စစ္ေဘးဒုကၡသည္ စခန္းအတြင္းကို က်ေရာက္ခဲ့တဲ့ လက္နက္ႀကီး က်ည္ဆံတစ္ခုကို ရွင္းလင္းေပးေစလို − ကိုးကန္႔အဖြဲ႕လူသစ္စုေဆာင္းမည္စိုး၍ ထြက္ေျပးလာသူအားလံုးနီးပါး ေနရပ္ျပန္ − ကခ်င္အဖြဲ႔မ်ား ျမစ္ဆံု အလိုမရွိ − ျမစ္ဆံုစီမံကိန္း ဆက္ရပ္ဆိုင္းထားဖို႔ ျပည္ပ ကခ်င္ေခါင္းေဆာင္ေတြ ေတာင္းဆို − ျမစ္ဆံုစီမံကိန္း စံုစမ္းစစ္ေဆးေရးေကာ္မရွင္ အစီရင္ခံစာအတိုင္း ေဆာင္ရြက္မည္ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page 1 of 38 Negotiations conducted to call PPST meeting Published 17 January 2019 | EMG reporter Negotiations are being conducted with organizations concerned to call a meeting of Peace Process Steering Team (PPST) formed with eight NCA signatories, said General Secretary Phado Saw Tardo Hmu of the Karen National Union (KNU). The PPST meeting was arranged to be held during November in 2018, but the KNU substituted General Saw Mutu Say Poe, the KNU representative to the PPST, with General Secretary Phado Saw Tardo Hmu. NCA signatories sent a letter to General Saw Mutu Say Poe who is chairing the PPST at the end of November in 2018, demanding that the PPST meeting would be called to focus on changes in the PPST and leadership role as well as peace process. Remaining eight ethnic armed organizations agreed ceasefire with the government demanded again on January 10 in 2019 to call a meeting of the PPST. The KNU has started negotiations to call the meeting of the PPST, General Secretary Phado Saw Tardo Hmu told the Daily Eleven newspaper. “We have a plan to hold a meeting. It must be held. We will have to do it. We still negotiate. We are negotiating with the organizations concerned,” said Phado Saw Tardo Hmu. The PPST formed with top leaders of ethnic armed organizations is to lead policy affairs in the peace process. The PPST was formed with the KNU, the RCSS, the DKBA, the KNU/KNLA-PC, the CNF, the ABSDF, the PNLO and the ALP in October in 2015. On February 13 in 2018, the NMSP and the LDU joined the PPST to be a part. The third summit of NCA signatories was held in Chiang Mai, Thailand from 8 September to 11 in 2018. The leader of the PPST is General Saw Mutu Say Poe and second leader is General Ywet Sit, Chairman of the RCSS. Translated and Edited by Win Htut https://elevenmyanmar.com/news/negotiations-conducted-to-call-ppst-meeting -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tatmadaw to meet RCSS in February Published 17 January 2019 | Min Naing Soe Tatmadaw negotiators are going to meet with the representatives of the Restoration Council of Shan State (RCSS) and adjust wrong war affairs during February, said Colonel Sai Ngin, secretary-3 of the RCSS. The government peace negotiators met with the representatives of the RCSS in Chiang Mai, Thailand on January 14 and held an informal meeting. During the meeting both sides focused on the meeting between Tatmadaw and the RCSS, said Colonel Sai Ngin. Page 2 of 38 The first informal meeting of the government peace negotiators and the representatives of the RCSS discussed to hold a separate meeting between Tatmadaw and RCSS, but it was not successful. Now we met with Myanmar peace commission and it could pave the way for us to meet with the NRPC and Tatmadaw during February, said Colonel Sai Ngin. “We planned to a meeting between the RCSS and Tatmadaw during the first informal meeting, but in vain. The yesterday’s meeting could pave the way a little. The RCSS will meet with the NRPC first and then with Tatmadaw,” said said Colonel Sai Ngin. The meeting of the NRPC and the RCSS will place emphasis on political affairs and development matters. It will be held in Nay Pyi Taw or in Yangon, said Colonel Sai Ngin. “The meeting will come at an opportune time. Both sides are negotiating to fix the date. I think it may be in February at the earliest,” said Colonel Sai Ngin. “We will discuss matters relating to the warfare with Tatmadaw. We will have to adjust misunderstanding between RCSS and Tatmadaw. The matters relating to the JMC will have to be discussed between us,” said Colonel Sai Ngin. Translated and Edited by Win Htut https://elevenmyanmar.com/news/tatmadaw-to-meet-rcss-in-february ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The New Year Starts With Armed Conflict Between Karen and Burma Armies in Northern Karen State Published January 16, 2019 | Author - Nan Way Phyo Zar Armed clashes in January 2019 between troops from the Karen National Liberation Army and Burma Army soldiers in Northern Papun District of Karen State. KNLA sources reported that two armed skirmishes happened on January 5 and 13 in the Karen National Union’s controlled Papun (Mutraw) area between the KNLA Brigade 5 and Burma Army units operating in the area. Major Saw Kler Doh from KNLA Brigade 5 told Karen News that the tensions that led to the armed clashes were because of Burma Army violating agreements not to enter restricted areas. “Our position is that we protect our defined territory,” Major Saw Kler Doh said. “The provocations began in early January. They [Burma army] crossed into our controlled areas – there has been already two clashes within this month. The tensions happened because they failed to respect our territory.” Page 3 of 38 The fighting this month happened in the Ler Doh Htee area in Lu Thaw Township between Ler Mu Plaw and Saw Mu Plaw village tracks. This is the same region where armed clashes broke out last year when the government reinforced its troops to build a contentious road despite not having a agreement with the Karen. In 2018 armed conflict displaced over 2,400 Karen villagers, with many until recently unable to return to their villages. The government’s Office of the Ministry of Defence issued a statement on January 8th stating that despite informing the local KNU of road repair works on January 1st, KNU troops attacked their soldiers building and securing the road on January 4, 2019. The MoD’s statement accused the KNU of destroying government road building vehicles. The Free Burma Rangers – a frontline humanitarian group pointed out in a recent report that the rationale behind the Burma Army’s road network in Luthaw is not regional development but is “to resupply and reinforce [it’s army] bases, strengthen military communications, and launch more rapid offensives and patrols.” The FBR report concluded that the Burma Army protected roads have a more sinister function. “The roads act as barriers restricting people’s movements, such as villagers accessing their farms, medics delivering health care, aid workers bringing food, and children going to school.” The Burma Army, despite claims it wants to make peace with ethnic armed groups, continues to wage conflict in Rakhine, Kachin, Shan and Karen States. http://karennews.org/2019/01/the-new-year-starts-with-armed-conflict-between-karen- and-burma-armies-in-northern-karen-state/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shan Forces Clash in Hsipaw Township ‘I am not clear whether it’s one-sided shooting or two sides exchanging fire with one another,’ a local said of the fighting between the RCSS and SSPP. By NETWORK MEDIA GROUP (NMG) | Thursday, January 17, 2019 Troops belonging to the Restoration Council of Shan State/Shan State Army (RCSS/SSA) and the Shan State Progress Party/Shan State Army (SSPP/SSA) clashed along the Hsipaw-Nam Lan road in northern Shan State on Tuesday, local sources said. A villager from Nawng Kaw Gyi in Hsipaw Township said that the fighting occurred near the neighboring community of Lon Waing on the morning of January 16. “Clashes occur almost everyday. I am not clear whether it’s one-sided shooting or two sides exchanging fire with one another,” the individual told NMG. “We heard sound of guns Page 4 of 38 shooting this morning, coming from Kong Sawt and Lon Waing villages located between Hsipaw and Nam Lan.” A worker with the Hsipaw-based organization Volunteers Without Borders, Ko Myo, said that the shooting began at around 7:00 a.m.
Recommended publications
  • Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER May 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Security Review
    Weekly Security Review Safety and security highlights for clients operating in Myanmar Released: 06 February 2020 Dates covered: 29 January - 04 February 2020 The information in this report is correct as of 1800 hours (UTC+6:30) 04 February 2020. The contents of this report are subject to copyright and must not be reproduced or shared without approval from Exera. The information in this report is intended to inform and advise; any mitigation implemented as a result of this information is the responsibility of the client. Questions or requests for further information can be directed to [email protected]. Exera Weekly Review Client-in-Confidence Page 2 of 5 Armed Conflict Two (2) incidents have been reported in the last report period (29 January - 04 February 2020): 1. IED: 2nd Feb 2020 - Time: Unknown - Kayin State's Hpapun Township On 27 January, Tatmadaw Battalion Commander of Light Infantry Battalion No. 708 was killed in a targeted mine attack in Kayin State's Hpapun Township. According to a Tatmadaw spokesperson; the mine was planted by the Karen National Union's armed wing Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA). Photo via RFA Facebook page 2. IED: 3rd Feb 2020 - 07:00Hrs - Myawaddy Township, Kayin State Statements released by the Kayin State Border Guard Force; at approximately 07:00Hrs on Monday 3 Feb, 2x explosive devices detonated beside a residence in the 4th Quarter, near Asia Highway (AH-1) in Myawaddy Township, Kayin State. - Type of devices: Unconfirmed - Injuries: 2x Casualties (taken to Myawaddy Hospital) - Fatalities: Nil Reported - No group claimed responsibility for the attack - Authorities are conducting further investigations Assessment In 2014, intense skirmishes between the Tatmadaw and the Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA) broke out on the outskirts of Myawaddy and a number of residents were displaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Arakan Army, AA)
    Division de l’information, de la documentation et des recherches – DIDR 9 avril 2021 Myanmar / Birmanie : L’Armée de l’Arakan (Arakan Army, AA) Avertissement Ce document, rédigé conformément aux lignes directrices communes à l’Union européenne pour le traitement de l’information sur le pays d’origine, a été élaboré par la DIDR en vue de fournir des informations utiles à l’examen des demandes de protection internationale. Il ne prétend pas faire le traitement exhaustif de la problématique, ni apporter de preuves concluantes quant au fondement d’une demande de protection internationale particulière et ne doit pas être considéré comme une position officielle de l’Ofpra. La reproduction ou diffusion du document n’est pas autorisée, à l’exception d’un usage personnel, sauf accord de l’Ofpra en vertu de l’article L. 335-3 du code de la propriété intellectuelle. Myanmar / Birmanie : L’Arakan Army, (AA) Table des matières 1. Principales caractéristiques de l’Arakan Army ................................................................................ 3 1.1. Une organisation liée à la KIA et à l’UWSA ............................................................................. 3 1.2. Relations avec les autres organisations politico-militaires ...................................................... 3 2. Les opérations armées de l’AA ont entraîné des représailles massives ......................................... 4 3. Les interventions de l’AA à des fins logistiques dans les villages ................................................... 5 4. Enlèvements
    [Show full text]
  • International Actors in Myanmar's Peace Process
    ISP-Myanmar research report Working Paper December 30, 2020 International Actors in Myanmar’s Peace Process n Aung Thu Nyein Aung Thu Nyein is EXECUTiVE SUMMARY director of communication and outreach program with the ISP-Myanmar. He is also an The international community has played an important role in supporting editor of "Myanmar Quarterly", an academic journal of the the peace process in Myanmar from the beginning, when the new ISP-Myanmar in Burmese government reached out to the ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) to language and leads a regular initiate – in some cases renew-- ceasefire negotiations in 2011. As the public talk program, Yawmingyi Zayat (Yaw Minister’s Open peace negotiation process has become protracted and even triggered Pavilion). He is a former new armed conflicts in some regions of the country, many international student activist in 1988 actors including donors have come to view Myanmar’s peace process pro-democracy movement and took leadership positions in with cynicism as if it is becoming “a process without peace”. exile democracy movement. He read Masters in Public The surging COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated a sense of peace Administration (M. P. A) at Harvard University in 2002. fatigue, which has sapped attention and resources of the international community from Myanmar. Moreover, the magnitude of the Rohingya crisis and subsequent international interventions coupled with the growing geopolitical rivalry between the United States and China have distracted the attention away from efforts to end a seven-decade long civil war in Myanmar. The National League for Democracy's (NLD) landslide victory in the general elections held in November 2020 means that the party will likely form a government to serve a five-year term.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    doi: 10.14456/jms.2018.19 Obstacles to Conflict Transformation in Myanmar: A Case Study of the Ta’ang National Liberation Army1 Thitiwut Boonyawongwiwat Centre for the Study of Ethnic Conflict (CSEC) Faculty of Political Science and Public Administration, Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand Email: [email protected] Received: May 3, 2018 Accepted: September 13, 2018 Abstract This article addresses the problem of ethnic conflict transformation in Myanmar by considering why the civil government could not convince all Ethnic Armed Groups (EAOs) to participate in the peace process and sign the National Ceasefire Agreement (NCA). These dynamics are examined through a comparison of the political life cycle of the Ta’ang, drawing from documentary data and ethnographic research. It argues that the problem of the current peace negotiations between the government and the Ta’ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) is rooted in the civil government’s inability to control the Myanmar army, especially its operations regarding the control of ethnic groups, which led to a lack of trust among all concerned. More importantly, it shows how civil-military relations in the domestic politics of Myanmar affect the resolution to the ethnic conflict. While the government is attempting to use political means, the army focuses only on military operations. It could be said then that this unfinished democratization changes the pattern of ethnic conflict to something akin to “talking while fighting.” Keywords: ethnic conflict, border, civil-military relations, peace process 1 An earlier version of this article was presented at the ISSS-ISAC Joint Conference Washington, D.C. 2017, American University in Washington, D.C., USA (October 13-14, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • Jadeand Conflict
    JADE AND CONFLICT Myanmar’s Vicious Circle June 2021 2 CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS / MAIN ARMED ORGANISATIONS ACTIVE IN THE JADE SECTOR .................. 4 MAP OF MYANMAR ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1. JADE AND CONFLICT: MYANMAR’S VICIOUS CIRCLE ...................................................................... 10 1.1 The NLD attempts to break the jade-conflict nexus ..................................................................................... 10 1.2 Mining reform derailed .................................................................................................................................. 11 Case Study: The 2019 Gemstone Law ........................................................................................................... 12 Case Study: State watchdog MGE keeps cosy industry ties rife with conflicts of interest .......................... 18 1.3 Jade after the coup ........................................................................................................................................ 22 2. ARMED GROUPS HOOKED ON JADE REVENUES .............................................................................. 26 2.1 The Tatmadaw profits from control over mining ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arakan Army : Myanmar’S New Front of Conflic
    This document is downloaded from DR‑NTU (https://dr.ntu.edu.sg) Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Arakan Army : Myanmar’s New Front of Conflic Bashar, Iftekharul 2019 Bashar, I. (2019). Arakan Army : Myanmar’s New Front of Conflic (RSIS Commentaries, No. 140). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. https://hdl.handle.net/10356/90016 Nanyang Technological University Downloaded on 30 Sep 2021 01:32:16 SGT Arakan Army: Myanmar’s New Front of Conflict By Iftekharul Bashar Synopsis The Arakan Army (AA) is a relatively new addition to conflict in western Myanmar, a region that has seen much unrest in recent years. Singapore’s 10 July 2019 announcement of the arrests of AA supporters raises questions about the outfit and its support among Rakhine Buddhists in confronting the Myanmar authorities. Commentary ON 10 JULY 2019, Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs announced that several Myanmar nationals are to be deported from Singapore after mobilising support for "armed violence against the Myanmar government". Though the announcement did not specify the number of persons arrested, at least one of the individuals investigated reportedly has a direct relationship with a key AA leader. The AA is an ethnic armed organisation in western Myanmar, founded a decade ago along with its political wing, the United League of Arakan (ULA). The group claims to be fighting for greater autonomy of the Rakhine Buddhist people. The arrests in Singapore unveil an important aspect of AA’s capability: support from Rakhines both at home and overseas. The AA’s clashes with the Tatmadaw, the Myanmar military, in the first half of 2019 has seen it using both traditional guerilla and terrorist tactics.
    [Show full text]
  • Arakan Army: Myanmar's New Front of Conflict
    www.rsis.edu.sg No. 140 – 12 July 2019 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical and contemporary issues. The authors’ views are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email to Mr Yang Razali Kassim, Editor RSIS Commentary at [email protected]. Arakan Army: Myanmar’s New Front of Conflict By Iftekharul Bashar Synopsis The Arakan Army (AA) is a relatively new addition to conflict in western Myanmar, a region that has seen much unrest in recent years. Singapore’s 10 July 2019 announcement of the arrests of AA supporters raises questions about the outfit and its support among Rakhine Buddhists in confronting the Myanmar authorities. Commentary ON 10 JULY 2019, Singapore’s Ministry of Home Affairs announced that several Myanmar nationals are to be deported from Singapore after mobilising support for "armed violence against the Myanmar government". Though the announcement did not specify the number of persons arrested, at least one of the individuals investigated reportedly has a direct relationship with a key AA leader. The AA is an ethnic armed organisation in western Myanmar, founded a decade ago along with its political wing, the United League of Arakan (ULA). The group claims to be fighting for greater autonomy of the Rakhine Buddhist people. The arrests in Singapore unveil an important aspect of AA’s capability: support from Rakhines both at home and overseas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER July 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Update July 2019 Report
    STATUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS & SANCTIONS IN MYANMAR JULY 2019 REPORT Summary. This report reviews the July 2019 developments relating to human rights in Myanmar. Relatedly, it addresses the interchange between Myanmar’s reform efforts and the responses of the international community. I. Political Developments......................................................................................................2 A. Rohingya Refugee Crisis................................................................................................2 B. Corruption.......................................................................................................................2 C. International Community / Sanctions...........................................................................3 II. Civil and Political Rights...................................................................................................3 A. Freedom of Speech, Assembly and Association............................................................3 B. Freedom of the Press and Censorship...........................................................................4 III. Economic Development.....................................................................................................5 A. Economic Development—Legal Framework, Foreign Investment............................5 B. Economic Development—Infrastructure, Major Projects..........................................6 C. Land Seizure....................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • ACLED Methodology and Coding Decisions Around Political Violence in Myanmar
    ACLED Methodology and Coding Decisions around Political Violence in Myanmar Coding political violence in Myanmar poses several methodological challenges given the complexity of the many conflicts in the country. In addition to armed conflict between the military and various ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) in the borderlands, the military in recent years has used nationlist sentiments to wage a campaign of violence and discrimination against Rohingya Muslims in Rakhine state. Further, in the country’s heartland, demonstrations have persisted not just over land and labor issues, but also to demand changes to the military-drafted 2008 constitution. A reference map of the country can be found at the end of this document. Shortly after Myanmar gained independence from the United Kingdom in 1948, several ethnic groups took up arms against the state, demanding equality and the right to self-determination. Divisions between ethnic groups had long been fostered by the colonial practice of ‘divide-and-rule’. This resulted in the center of the country being governed separately from the frontier areas where many ethnic minorities reside. Despite the signing of the Panglong Agreement prior to 1 independence, the failure of the central government to address ethnic concerns led to rebellions by Karen rebels in 1949 and by Kachin rebels in the early 1960s. Other ethnic minorities also took up arms during this period. In March 1962, the military seized power in a coup. It continued with a ‘divide-and-rule’ approach in its dealings with ethnic armed groups, and further adopted a policy of ‘four cuts’, which aimed to eliminate local support for armed groups (Smith, 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report No
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 486 | NOVEMBER 2020 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org The Arakan Army in Myanmar: Deadly Conflict Rises in Rakhine State By David Scott Mathieson Contents Introduction: A Deadly Conflict Rises in Rakhine State .................3 Background and Rise of the Arakan Army ......................4 The Nature of Arakan Army Warfare and Strategy ...................7 Attitudes toward Rohingya and Muslim Minorities ................ 15 Conclusions and Recommendations ...................... 17 Kyaw Han, general secretary of United League of Arakan/Arakan Army, attends a March 2019 meeting with government, military, and ethnic armed organizations. (Photo by Aung Shine Oo/AP) Summary • Myanmar’s most serious conflict Tatmadaw and compounding the narrowing possibilities for political in many decades has emerged human and physical damage. solutions. This conflict will continue in Rakhine State between the • The AA’s sophisticated communi- to escalate absent the AA’s inclu- Myanmar armed forces (Tatmad- cations strategies use social me- sion in the peace process, send- aw) and the Arakan Army (AA), de- dia to swell its recruitment base, ing Rakhine State into a downward manding self-determination for the build civilian support, trade insults spiral that could seriously damage Buddhist Rakhine ethnic minority. It with the Tatmadaw, and reach an the rest of the country. leaves Rohingya refugees with lit- international audience. • With strategic investments to pro- tle chance of a safe return. • Government efforts to marginalize tect in Rakhine’s Kyaukphyu port, • The AA’s guerrilla tactics have and demonize the AA are counter- influence on other armed groups, caused many military and civil- productive with the Rakhine pop- and an interest in the peace pro- ian casualties, evoking a typically ulation, hardening attitudes and cess, China is the only external fierce armed response from the player that can influence the AA.
    [Show full text]