DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Harvard Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX B: Existing Conditions Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

City of Harvard Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX B: Existing Conditions Report April 2015 Acknowledgements Funding Acknowledgement This project was supported through the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s (CMAP) Local Technical Assistance (LTA) program, which is funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), and the Chicago Community Trust. The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus (MMC) and CMAP would like to thank these funders for their support for this project. Unless otherwise specified, all photos are by CMAP staff. 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Housing and Population 41 Regional Context 9 Economic Development 56 Previous Plans 13 Transportation 69 Community Engagement 18 Natural Environment 89 Governance and Community Services 25 Looking Forward 112 Land Use and Development 31 3 3 1. Introduction The City of Harvard has decided to update its comprehensive plan, which will define the vision of the City’s future and the steps needed to achieve that vision. Having an accurate understanding of the existing conditions in the City is necessary in order to develop an appropriate and effective comprehensive plan that addresses the issues and concerns of the community. Why Does Harvard Need a Comprehensive Plan? The history of the City of Harvard begins with its rich agricultural lands and the connection the railroad provided to the larger markets in the Chicago region. Responding to the demands of local farmers as well as the railroad, manufacturing industries took root and the community grew rapidly. Harvard continues to boast a small-town feel nestled in among farm fields and open spaces that is quite distinct from other places in the region. Both the agricultural and manufacturing economies continue to change and have impacts on housing and commercial demand. Today, there is potential for infill development and redevelopment, particularly within downtown, along Route 14, and at the site of a former Motorola facility. To address these contemporary challenges, the City is looking to enhance its commercial corridors, industrial areas, residential neighborhoods, and transportation network. Building on its existing comprehensive plan to provide direction, the City sought out technical assistance for this project from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP). The community’s physical, economic, and social character will be determined by decisions made today and in the future. Having an updated plan that clearly articulates the desired character of the community will help at all levels of the decision-making process. The updated Comprehensive Plan will serve as a guide for elected officials, municipal staff, community residents, business owners and potential investors, allowing them to make informed community development decisions affecting land use, transportation, infrastructure, and capital improvements. By following the plan, those decisions can help achieve the long-term goals and vision of the community. Figure 1.1. Harvard, Illinois Figure 1.2. Harvard and the 1.5-mile planning boundary. What is a Comprehensive Plan? A comprehensive plan outlines the vision of the community and the policies and strategies that will allow it to achieve that vision. In addition to providing a well-defined framework for the preservation and enhancement of community assets, the plan guides development and investment decisions in the best interest of community residents. Typically a comprehensive plan is written to provide guidance for a community to work towards its vision over the next 10 to 20 years. Although the plan should be viewed as a long-term document, it should also be used daily by the community to assist in land use and development decisions. The comprehensive plan should also be considered flexible and adaptable to changes in and around the community. At any time, the City can update its comprehensive plan to match local needs, interests, or opportunities. It is typically recommended that a municipality update its comprehensive plan every five years to keep the plan as accurate as possible. 4 FigureFig 1.1 1.1.Study City Area of Harvard, - Municipal Illinois. Boundary Chemung Alden township township k RD LAWRENCE e re C w nce Creek sa re a trib Law c is P OAK GROVE RD Lawrence Creek 4 1 S- U ¤£14 k e e r C r le e k trib Mo D R E V O R T G S K A N O Beck's Woods O I S S I V «¬173 Conservation I Area D Soucie N Conservation Lions Park Easement & Aquatic Center IL-173 RAMER RD W DIGGINS ST Harvard Milky Way Metra Park Station D R Z T L «¬173 U H C IL-173 «¬173 W BRINK ST S Mokeler Creek AIRPORT RD MCGUIRE RD S DIVISION ST DIVISION S Rush Creek D R Rush Creek N O Conservation R Harvard I t T r A Gateway Area ib L Dunham Hartland F N Nature Park B r K i township s township h w «¬23 a uk e e ¤£14 k 2 City of Harvard e I Metra Station US-14 e r C e IL-23 Township Boundaryn Metra Rail u rib Rus ry t h e Creek UnincorporatedG Freight Rail Open Space e Airport Community Research Cemeteries Forest Conservation Easement Water Bodies [ Van Maren 0 0.25 0.5 Conservation Streams Miles Easement 5 Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2015. FigureFig 1.2 1.2. Study City Area of Harvard, - Municipal Illinois Boundary and 1.5-mile plus planningPlanning area. Buffer re ALDEN RD wrence C ek t La rib W B r P isc as aw Chemung Alden C r township township W B Bangert r P Conservation is c a s US-14 Easement a Stowe w Conservation High Point Easement Conservation Area t ri b Nippe LAWRENCE RD rs in k C r e e k OAK GROVE RD t k ri Cree b Lawrence Beeson W Simon B Conservation t r Conservation r P i Easement i b s Easement c M a L o ittle s Bea a k IL-173 ve w e Crowley r l e C C 14 r r ¤£ r C Sedge e e e r e e k k Meadow e k D R E V O R T S G K N A O O I S I S k «¬173 V e I re D Soucie C N Lions saw Conservation ca Park Pis Easement Beck's Woods Harvard HU NTER RD Conservation RAMER RD W DIGGINS ST Metra Area Milky Station Way 2 D Park R Z T L «¬173 U H IL-173 «¬173 W BRINK ST C S eek eler Cr Mok AIRPORT RD Conservation S DIVISIONS ST Area reek Rush C Rush Creek D R Conservation N Harvard MCGUIRE RD O IR Gateway Area T A L F Nature Park «¬23 Dunham Hartland township township ¤£14 Community Research Forest Conservation Easement Van Maren U S Conservation -1 Easement 4 IL-23 yune Cree k tr Ger ib Ru City of Harvard 2 Metra Station sh Creek Woodstock Center 1.5 Mile Planning Buffer Metra Rail Conservation Easement Township Boundary Freight Rail e Unincorporated Airport Open Space N trib B N r K DEEP CUT RD B Brookdale r i Cemeteries s [ K Conservation h is w 0 0.5 1 hwa uk Area a Water Bodies Miles e u e k e e R i Streams v e r 6 Source: Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning, 2015. Land Uses Policies and Regulations Comprehensive Plans provide a vision and policy framework to guide decision making for the community. They form the basis for establishing standards and regulations. Zoning ordinances specify the type and intensity of land uses allowed on a given parcel, such as the type, size, and density of residential or commercial development. Subdivision codes or ordinances specify development elements for a parcel: housing footprint minimums, distance from the house to the road, the width of the road, street configuration, open space requirements, and lot size. Elements of a Comprehensive Plan Under the Illinois Municipal Code (65 ILCS) 5/11-12-5(1)), a municipal plan commission is responsible for preparing and recommending a “comprehensive plan for the present and future development or redevelopment of the municipality.” A comprehensive plan is composed of a series of distinct yet interrelated elements defined within the Illinois Local Planning Assistance Act (Public Act 92-0768). The key elements addressed in the Harvard Comprehensive Plan will be based upon those outlined in the State Statute: Land Use Housing Natural Resources Transportation and Circulation Economic Development Implementation Strategies In addition to the primary elements listed above, comprehensive plans commonly include additional elements that may either be unique sections in the plan or may be incorporated as common themes that run throughout the document. Additional elements that will be considered for the Harvard Comprehensive Plan include community facilities, governance, and community character. Plan Implementation The Comprehensive Plan is intended to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of the City. Here are some practical ways to ensure that future activities are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan: Annual Work Programs and Budgets: The City Council and Administration should be cognizant of the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan when preparing annual work programs and budgets. Development Approvals: The approvals process for development proposals, including rezoning and subdivi- sion plats, should be a central means of implementing the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning and subdivision ordinance should be updated in response to regulatory strategies presented in the Comprehensive Plan. Capital Improvements: Capital improvement projects should be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan’s land use policies and infrastructure recommendations (water, sewer, stormwater, transportation, and parks and recreation).
Recommended publications
  • HARD CHOICES a Report on the Increasing Gap Between America's Infrastructure Needs and Our Ability to Pay for Them

    HARD CHOICES a Report on the Increasing Gap Between America's Infrastructure Needs and Our Ability to Pay for Them

    98th Congress JOINT COMMTTTEE P { S. PBT. App. 10 2d Session J 98-164 HARD CHOICES A Report on the Increasing Gap Between America's Infrastructure Needs and Our Ability To Pay for Them Appendix 10. MASSACHUSETTS A CASE STUDY PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY OF THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES FEBRUARY 25, 1984 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 31-895 0 WASHINGTON: 1984 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Congress) SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa, Chairman LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Vice Chairman WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR., Delaware GILLIS W. LONG, Louisiana JAMES ABDNOR, South Dakota PARREN J. MITCHELL, Maryland STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho AUGUSTUS F. HAWKINS, California MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia DAVID R. OBEY, Wisconsin ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin MARJORIE S. HOLT, Maryland EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts DAN LUNGREN, California PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine Baucm R. BARTLETT, Extecutive Director JAMES K. GALBRAITH, Deputy Director SuBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Chairman LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas, Vice Chairman AUGUSTUS F. HAWKINS, California ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York (U) Preface Infrastructure problems are widespread. They do not respect regional or state boundaries. To secure a better data base concerning national and state infrastructure conditions and to develop threshold estimates of national and state infrastructure conditions, the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress requested that the University of Colorado's Graduate School of Public Affairs direct a twenty-three state infrastructure study.
  • Route 808 Crystal Lake

    Route 808 Crystal Lake

    Effective Date REGULAR FARE ROUTE Crystal Lake- January 29, 2018 Use your Ventra® Card Harvard Route 808 or exact fare in cash. 808 All Pace service is Driver Has No Change wheelchair accessible. Customers may use a Ventra Card, contactless bankcard, Ventra Ticket, Ride Free or Reduced Fare permit, or cash to pay fares on Pace fixed route services. Reduced fares are available for children (ages 7-11) and high school, junior high and grammar school students (ages 12-20) presenting a valid Ventra Student Riding 7 Permit or valid school I.D. between 5:30am and 8:30pm on school Garfield H days. Seniors 65 and older, people with disabilities and individuals Mercy with a valid Medicare card qualify for reduced fares. A valid RTA McKinley Harvard Northbound trips only. Grant Reduced Fare Permit must be presented when using cash to pay a Hospital Harvard Brown reduced fare. Eligible seniors and people with disabilities may ride Station fixed route services for free through the RTA Ride Free Program. Division Southbound trips only. 6 Please contact the RTA at (312) 913-3110 for more information on Diggins free and reduced fares. Free rides are offered to children under 7 (max two children per fare paying adult), law enforcement officers Certain trips only. and firefighters in full uniform or presenting a badge, and active duty Ayers St. Please see schedule. military personnel in uniform. See the Pace Fare Guide for current Hwy 173 fares, passes, restrictions and additional information. Visit ventrachicago.com or call 877-NOW-VENTRA to purchase and Marian Central load value and passes onto your Ventra Card.
  • Hydrogeology and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Aquifers Underlying Belvidere, Illinois

    Hydrogeology and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Aquifers Underlying Belvidere, Illinois

    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Hydrogeology and Simulation of Ground-Water Flow in the Aquifers Underlying Belvidere, Illinois By P.C. Mills (U.S. Geological Survey), J.E. Nazimek (U.S. Geological Survey), K.J. Halford (U.S. Geological Survey), and D.J. Yeskis (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4100 In cooperation with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Illinois Environmental Protection Agency Urbana, Illinois 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 221 N. Broadway Avenue Box 25286 Urbana, IL 61801 Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract.................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose and Scope....................................................................................................................................................... 6
  • Mchenry County Water Resources 2020-9-4 SK-DS 1 MCHENRY

    Mchenry County Water Resources 2020-9-4 SK-DS 1 MCHENRY

    MCHENRY COUNTY WATER RESOURCES Approximately 10,000 to 20,000 years ago glaciers from the most recent period of glaciation (Wisconsin glaciation) retreated from McHenry County leaving a water-rich tapestry of lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands. As soon as the landscape became more hospitable, Native Americans became regular visitors to McHenry County. Archaeologists have uncovered artifacts that verify the presence of Native Americans in McHenry County extending back 12,000 years before present (BP). Large and small wetlands likely provided the most productive and easily harvested food resources, including game and vegetation, for the earliest people 10. For thousands of years Native Americans of many tribes and cultures migrated through and occupied McHenry County, relying on its abundant natural resources. In the 1800’s, expanding European settlement forced Native American occupants from McHenry County and many man-made changes were implemented that degraded the health of water resources. Changes included converting prairie, wetland and woodland to agriculture; draining or filling wetlands and channelizing streams to increase agricultural land; and grading or paving over land for residential and commercial development. These changes accelerated as new technologies were introduced and urban development expanded into the countryside. Historically, the native vegetation in McHenry County consisted predominantly of deep rooted plant species that held soils in place, protected soil from erosion, intercepted and stored rainfall, and sequestered organic carbon in the soil. The canopy and roots of trees in woodlands, another historically dominant plant community in the county, were also capable of intercepting, storing and transpiring rainfall. The canopy and interconnected root systems of the native vegetation acted as a sponge capable of absorbing, storing, and transpiring tremendous volumes of water, thereby reducing the potential for flooding and promoting the infiltration of groundwater.
  • South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary

    South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary

    South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary Approved by SCWCTS Steering Committee on July 18, 2008 Prepared for: SCWCTS Steering Committee in association with: Cambridge Systematics Weaver Consulting July 2008 http://www.co.rock.wi.us/Dept/SCWCTS/ South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Steering Committee Membership City of Beloit Stateline Area Transportation Study (SLATS) City of Janesville Janesville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (JAMPO) Village of Sharon Village of Clinton Rock County, Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Transportation Wisconsin State Senator Judy Robson, District 15 Administered by: City of Beloit: Mike Flesh, Chair City of Janesville: Brad Cantrell, Chair SLATS: Bob Soltau Janesville Area MPO: Alexis Kuklenski The preparation of this report was financed in part through a joint planning grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary In 2002, a study to connect Metra’s Chicago-based UP-Northwest Line service from Harvard, Illinois, to Clinton was completed. Through the sponsorship of Wisconsin State Senator Judy Robson, a Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) grant was obtained to advance the concept for service further, and examine bringing commuter rail from Harvard to the Janesville/Beloit area. The unique location, commuter traveling patterns, and transportation infrastructure in this area led to an expansion of the study area to include Madison and Rockford, and a widened range of transit modes and infrastructure improvements. This Executive Summary describes the approach, findings and recommendations of the project. A listing of reports completed during the conduct of the study is also provided.
  • The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation

    The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation

    The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 1 The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation COMMISSIONED BY AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2013 COVER: MOCKINGBIRD STATION, DALLAS, TX Photo by DART CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 Previous Research 6 Findings 8 Phoenix 12 Chicago 17 Boston 23 Minneapolis-St. Paul 27 San Francisco 32 Conclusion 33 Methodology THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Center for Neighborhood Technology Lead Author: Sofia Becker Scott Bernstein, Linda Young Analysis: Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Al Benedict, and Cindy Copp Report Contributors and Reviewers: Center for Neighborhood Technology: Peter Haas, Stephanie Morse American Public Transportation Association: Darnell Grisby National Association of Realtors: Darren W. Smith Report Layout: Center for Neighborhood Technology Kathrine Nichols THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 Executive Summary Fueled by demographic change and concerns over quality of life, there has been a growing interest in communities with active transportation modes. The recession added another dimension to these discussions by emphasizing the economic impli- cations of transportation choices. Housing and transportation, the two economic sectors mostly closely tied to the built environment, were both severely impacted by the economic downturn. There has been a growing effort among planners, real estate professionals, and economists to identify not only the economic benefits of alternative transportation modes in and of themselves, but also the impact that they have on housing prices and value retention.
  • Union Pacific - Northwest Line

    Union Pacific - Northwest Line

    Union Pacific - Northwest Line Schedules as of Dec 2019 Line at a Glance › 22 trains in the AM Peak › 12 trains in the Midday › Average Trip Length (2019) : 24.7 miles › 20 trains in the PM Peak › Average Fare Paid (2019) : $4.60 › 11 trains in the Evening › Number of Stations: 23 › 34 trains on Saturdays › Route Length: Main Line: 63.1 miles; McHenry Branch: 7.4 miles › 21 trains on Sundays › Number of Weekday Trains (Nov 2019): 65 › On-Time Performance (2019): 93% › 56% of UP-NW riders drive to their boarding station. › 2nd highest ridership line › 6% more people live along the UP-NW than did in 2010. › 52% of riders board in › 5% more people work along the UP-NW than did in 2010. zones D, E, and F › 2nd highest number of intermediate riders Figure 1: Annual UP-NW Ridership 14.0 11.61 › Longest line in the system 12.0 8.94 9.53 9.17 10.06 10.38 10.0 at 63 miles 8.0 › Only line directly serving 6.0 4.0 McHenry County 2.0 Millions 0.0 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 19 Passenger Trips in Trips in Passenger Year The data included in this document predates the onset of COVID-19, which has greatly impacted Metra’s riders and operations. This information is presented to inform the public about Metra’s historic and recent operational environment but may not be illustrative of Metra’s current or future operations.

  • Pavement, Box Culverts and Bridges

    MCHENRY COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PLAN Alden Road Bridge - Alden, IL Photo by: Wynnyth Adair LAST REVISED MAY 2018 COUNTY OF MCHENRY MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS SMPP Prepared by of the McHenry County Division of Water Resources, Department of Health, and Division of Transportation 2200 N. Seminary Ave. Woodstock, IL 60098 Phone 815-334-4560 • Fax 815-334-4546 Adapted from Lake County Stormwater Management Commission Table of Contents 1 Overview of the Stormwater Management Program Plan ________________________1 1.A Introduction ____________________________________________________________1 1.B State & Federal Regulations_______________________________________________2 1.C Countywide Approach to NPDES Compliance _______________________________3 1.D Organization of the Stormwater Management Program Plan ___________________5 1.E Watersheds, Sub-watersheds, and Receiving Waters __________________________6 2 Program Management ___________________________________________________13 2.A Implementation of this SMPP ____________________________________________13 2.B Intra-Department Coordination __________________________________________13 2.B.1 Water Resources Manager ______________________________________________13 2.B.2 Department of Planning and Development, Division of Water Resources _________15 2.B.3 Division of Transportation and Facilities Management ________________________15 2.C Coordination between McHenry County Departments & Divisions _____________15 2.D Coordination with Fox River Study Group _________________________________16

  • Metra Construction Program

    UP-N ILLINOIS / WISCONSIN STATE LINE McHENRY NCS LAKE UP-NW MD-N 56 37 59 19 68 69 17 16 25 36 LAKE 28 18 MICHIGAN COOK 15 MD-W 74 14 73 40 29 65 35 72 13 42 DU PAGE 63 41 12 UP-W 70 71 11 60 64 Downtown 55 CHICAGO 53 39 38 53 20 52 54 51 27 26 67 57 48 49 50 30 1 66 58 84 33 2 32 3 BNSF 77 76 4 31 62 21 43 5 22 44 WILL 34 6 75 61 61 SS 78 7 79 8 80 9 45 HC 82 Metra 24 23 Construction 83 RI 81 Program 46 ME 10 ILLINOIS / INDIANA STATE LINE 2018 47 SWS 2018Metra Construction Program STATIONS CROSSING REPLACEMENTS BRIDGES Metra Electric Metra Electric/South Chicago Branch UP North 1 63rd Street – warming shelter 31 90th Street, Chicago 63 Chicago – continuation of multiyear 2 75th Street – warming shelter 32 73rd Street, Chicago project to replace 11 bridges from Grace to Balmoral avenues and the inbound 3 83rd Street – warming shelter 33 Dorchester Avenue, Chicago portion of the Ravenswood Station 4 87th Street – warming shelter Metra Electric/Blue Island Branch 64 Chicago – replace the bridges over Webster Avenue and the North Branch 5 91st Street – warming shelter 34 Perry Avenue, Chicago of the Chicago River 6 103rd Street – warming shelter Milwaukee District North 7 Riverdale – painting and repairs Milwaukee District West 35 Devon Avenue, Chicago 65 Elgin – continuation of multi-year project 8 147th Street – painting and repairs 36 St.
  • Joliet Train Station Schedule

    Joliet Train Station Schedule

    Joliet Train Station Schedule Unessential Arvie flats subject. Is Henry micrologic when Jule pry speedfully? Seriatim overweary, Winston reactivating Sawneys and meow Cambodians. Train-to-Track Shuttle Service was service was following the schedule tofrom Joliet. Joliet Union Station Joliet IL. Joliet IL Local News Information Articles Stories. Website of the proposed Illinois High-Speed alarm System. Customer Alerts for this vital Route Diagram and cigarette with stations and. Schedule The 7 am train which of Chicago does my stop giving all stations There are for morning and explore early evening departures in once direction Trains depart. You will not sold to schedule for train stations to assist local rockford. Best ways to ill from LA Fitness to AmtrakMetra Joliet Union Station JOL Download the app Schedule concern later Ridesharing Fare Estimates Enter pick-up. Gov Bruce Rauner joined Joliet on Wednesday in a celebration of the life's new train reward and promised a bus station just next. What Metra line attitude to Joliet? The Joliet Police experience is making plans to flop up to 50 new recruits over. The train station is the orland park? Transportation Travel CTA Metra O'Hare Airport Midway Airport Union Station. Naperville Metra And Amtrak Information Naperville IL. The HC train Direction Chicago Union as has 7 stations departing from Joliet and ending in Chicago Union Station HC train event schedule overview than the. Joliet IL JOL Great American Stations. CNUP Joliet Subdivision K3Railroads. Rock island train? What is goes from Joliet to Chicago? Metra Joliet Station New waiting Lot Parking Lot Parkopedia.
  • SLATS Rail Study

    SLATS Rail Study

    SLATS Passenger Rail Study Prepared for Stateline Area Transportation Study February 2021 SLATS Passenger Rail Study Prepared for: Stateline Area Transportation Study Prepared by: AECOM 303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1400 Chicago, IL 60601 aecom.com Final Report submitted: February 2021 Statement on COVID-19 The decision to conduct this study was made in fall 2019 with the goal of having study results in time for the SLATS 2045 LRTP update (beginning in early 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has created many challenges for the transportation industry, resulting in a host of uncertainties. The long-term impacts of the pandemic on travel demand and commute patterns were not clear at that time of this study. The evaluation and market analysis contained in this report reflects pre- pandemic conditions, and conclusions should consider these uncertainties. Stateline Area Transportation Study SLATS Passenger Rail Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................... vi 1. Overview................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Stateline Area Transportation Study ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Background and Purpose ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Study Methodology
  • IV. Travel Patterns

    IV. Travel Patterns

    Transit Component McHenry County 2040 Transportation Plan Existing Conditions Report IV. Travel Patterns In order to better understand the potential for transit services, it is important to look at where people travel within and outside of the county, both for work trips and other purposes. In order to do so, Journey to Work data from the U.S. Census and information from the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) was analyzed. CMAP’s Household Travel Inventory information from 2008 provided information about why McHenry County residents travel as they do. The following sections summarize these travel patterns. A. Employment and Residence Locations The mean travel time to work in McHenry County is approximately 34 minutes, compared to 28 minutes for Illinois. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, McHenry County workers were employed in 103 different counties in Illinois, Wisconsin, and several other states. Year 2000 Journey to Work data currently remains the most reliable census data regarding travel patterns. Table 4 shows the five counties with the largest number of McHenry County residents working in them. The majority of McHenry County residents (51%) work within the county. Cook County, which includes Chicago and other major employment areas, draws 24% of the workers from McHenry County. Lake County, which is directly east of McHenry County, draws 13% of all McHenry County workers. Table 4: Employment Locations of McHenry County Residents % of Total Working McHenry County Work County Residents McHenry County 51% Cook County 24% Lake County 13% Kane County 7% DuPage County 3% Source: U.S. Census Table 5 shows the counties with the highest totals of residents working in McHenry County.