DOCSLIB.ORG

Xx -':1 + COMMUNITY ASSISTJ\NCE O PLAN ING REPORT N;O, 240 Lj;;.J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Xx -':1 + COMMUNITY ASSISTJ\NCE O PLAN ING REPORT N;O, 240 Lj;;.J ~I xx -':1 + COMMUNITY ASSISTJ\NCE o PLAN ING REPORT N;O, 240 lJ;;.J _1- ,_', 'J DEL VA~~ [1- r ..... ~ W r S- ONSIN RE;GIONAL PJ: ANNIN{l SEWRPCADVISORY COMMITTEE ON SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN COMMUTER RAIL FEASIBILITY PLANNING REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION IN THE WALWORTH-FOX LAKE CORRIDOR Brian G. DuPont ........................................... Commissioner, Highway KENOSHA COUNTY RACINE COUNTY Chairman Department, Walworth County Philip C. Evenson .................................................. Executive Director, Leon T. Dreger Richard A. Hansen Secretary Southeastern Wisconsin Thomas J. Gorlinski Jean M. Jacobson, Regional Planning Commission Sheila M. Siegler Secretary James E. Moyer David Bollweg ............................................... Chairman, Town of Linn Linda Bolte ........................................... Deputy Director for Planning, Chicago Area Transportation Study MILWAUKEE COUNTY WALWORTH COUNTY Joel P. Ettinger ............................................... Area Director, Region V, Federal Transit Administration, Daniel J. Diliberti Anthony F. Balestrieri U.S. Department ofTransportation William R. Drew, Allen L. Morrison, Gary A. Foyle ....................................................... Director of Planning Vice Chairman Treasurer and Analysis, Metra David A. Novak Robert J. Voss Edward J. Friede .................................... Manager, Systems Planning Group, District 2, Wisconsin Department of Transportation OZAUKEE COUNTY WASHINGTON COUNTY William E. Gardner ............................................................... President, Leroy A. Bley Daniel S. Schmidt Wisconsin & Southern Thomas H. Buestrin, Patricia J. Strachota Railroad Company Chairman Peter D. Ziegler Kenneth J. Leonard .............................. Director, Bureau of Planning, GusW. Wirth, Jr. Division ofTransportation Investment Management, Wisconsin Department of Transportation WAUKESHA COUNTY Dwight E. McComb ......................................... Systems Planning and Programs Engineer, Duane H. Bluemke Federal Highway Administration, Kenneth C. Herro U.S. Department of Transportation Paul G. Vrakas James M. Parker .............................. President, Village of Genoa City Pauline A. Parker ...................... Walworth County Board Supervisor, Member, Transportation and Parks Committee David A. Rasmussen .............................. Trustee, Village of Walworth Charles Rude .....................................Alderman, City of Lake Geneva RobertW. Sandy .................................... President, Village of Fontana William H. Sills, 11I ......................................... Secretary, Geneva Lake Area JointTransit Commission; and Member, Wisconsin SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL River RailTransit Commission PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF James Van,Dreser ............................... Supervisor, Town of Walworth Mark E. Wendorf .......................................... Director of Public Works, City of Delavan Philip C. Evenson, AICP ................... Executive Director Donald H. Weyhrauch ................... President, Village of Williams Bay Kenneth R.Yunker, PE ..................... Assistant Director Special acknowledgment is due the following individuals who NancyM.Anderson,AICP ................. Chief Community served as members or alternates during the preparation ofthis plan: Assistance Planner Mr. Brian Bliesner, Project Engineer, Systems Planning Group, Wisconsin Department of Transportation; Mr. Kenneth Clemmons, RobertE. Beglinger ............ Chief Transportation Engineer Manager of Sales, Wisconsin & Southern Railroad Company; Mr. Benjamin J. Coopman, Jr., Commissioner, Highway Department, Robert P. Biebel, PE, PH ......... Chief Environmental Engineer Walworth County; Mr. Dale A. Curley, Superintendent of Passenger Operations, Wisconsin & Southern Railroad Company; Mr. Douglas Leland H. Kreblin, RLS .............. Chief Planning Illustrator F. Dalton, Chief, Urban Planning, Wisconsin Department of Trans­ portation; Mr. Joel P. Ettinger,Area Director, RegionV, FederalTransit Elizabeth A. Larsen ...................... Business Manager Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation; Mr. Thomas L. Frank, Systems Planning and Programs Engineer, Federal Highway John G. McDougall ................. Geographic Information Administration, U.S. Department of Trans-portation; Mr. John M. Systems Manager Glass, Trustee, Village of Walworth; Mr. Lyle G. Gomm, Section Manager, Office of Planning and Analysis, Metra; Mr. Vernon J. John R. Meland ......... Chief Econom ic Development Planner Haan, Member, Historic Preservation Committee, City of Lake Geneva; Mr. Chris L. Jones, Supervisor, Town of Linn; Mr. Gerald C. Donald M. Reed ............................ Chief Biologist Kerns, Chief of Police, Town of Linn; Ms. Marianne P. Klemke, President, Village of Williams Bay; Ms. Irene M. LaBonne, President, William J. Stauber,AICP .............. Chief Land Use Planner Village of Fontana; Mr. H. M. McConville, Superintendent of Transportation, Wisconsin & Southern Railroad Company; Mr. Special acknowledgment is due Mr. Otto P. Dobnick, SEWRPC Wayne R. Miczek, Chief Transportation Planner, Chicago Area Principal Planner. for his contribution to the conduct ofthis study Transportation Study; Ms. June M. Notbusch, Public Works and the preparation of this report. Special appreciation is also Assistant, City of Delavan; Mr. James M. Parker, President, Village of extended to Mr Lyle G. Gomm, Section Manager in the Metra Genoa City; Mr. Floyd F. Pierce, Supervisor, Town of Walworth; Mr. Office of Planning &Analysis, and Mr. Douglas M. Jakalski, Senior Lyle A. Smith, Director of Public Works, City of Delavan; and Mr. Civil Engineer in the firm of T.y. Lin International Bascor, for their David M. Trowbridge, Transportation Planner, Bureau of Planning, assistance in the conduct ofthis study. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE PLANNING REPORT NUMBER 240 W ALWORTH-FOX LAKE CORRIDOR COMMUTER RAIL AND BUS SERVICE FEASIBILITY STUDY Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission P.O. Box 1607 Old Courthouse 916 N. East Avenue Waukesha, Wisconsin 53187-1607 August 2001 Inside Region $10.00 Outside Region $20.00 (This page intentionally left blank) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Page Chapter I-INTRODUCTION ......................... 1 Street and Highway Crossings ......................... 45 Study Purpose...... .......... .............. ........ ...... .......... 1 Passenger Depot Buildings................. .............. 46 Definition of Commuter Rail Service.................. 4 Existing Fox Lake-Chicago Railway Line.. ..... 46 Commuter Rail. ..................................... ............ 4 Existing Arterial Streets and Highways.. ............. 47 Light Rail...... ..................................... ..... .......... 6 Summary.............................................................. 47 Heavy Rail.. .............................. ................ ........ 6 High Speed Rail.......................... ...................... 7 Chapter IV-POTENTIAL COMMUTER Scope of Work ........................ .............. ............... 7 ROUTE FACILITIES AND SERVICES ...... 51 Study Area ........................................... ................ 7 Introduction ...................... ~.................................. 51 Study Organization.......... ....... .......... ................... 9 Commuter Rail Route Alignment........ ................ 51 Scheme of Presentation........................................ 9 Population......................................................... 52 Employment ..................................................... 53 Chapter ll-EXISTING LAND USE Adjacent Land Uses.......................................... 53 AND TRAVEL PATTERNS ........................... 11 Right-of-Way Ownership and Availability ...... 53 Introduction ........ ............................................ ..... 11 Relative Capital Costs.. .......... ..................... ..... 56 Population, Households, and Employment.......... 11 Relative Operating Costs.................................. 56 Existing Land Use................................................ 11 Evaluation of Commuter Rail Historic Urban Growth........................ ............. 11 Route Alignments........................................... 56 Planned Urban Development.... ................ ........ 15 Commuter Bus Route Alignment ........................ 57 Major Potential Trip Generators....................... 15 Passenger Station Facilities ................................. 58 Educational Institutions................................. 17 Number and Spacing of Passenger Stations..... 58 Major Resorts.......... ......... .......... ................... 17 Specific Locations of Passenger Stations......... 62 Major Recreational Boating Facilities........... 18 Delavan-Williams Bay-Harvard Other Major Recreational Centers......... ........ 18 Feeder Bus Route ........................................... 64 Existing Travel Patterns....................................... 19 Elkhorn-Lake Geneva-Fox Lake Travel Within the Primary Study Area.... ......... 20 Feeder Bus Route ........................................... 65 Interregional Travel............... ................... ........ 21 Basic Commuter Rail and Commuter Bus Seasonal Increases in TraveL.... ........ ............... 24 Passenger Station Facility Requirements ....... 66 Summary.............................................................. 26 Platforms.... .............
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HARD CHOICES a Report on the Increasing Gap Between America's Infrastructure Needs and Our Ability to Pay for Them
    98th Congress JOINT COMMTTTEE P { S. PBT. App. 10 2d Session J 98-164 HARD CHOICES A Report on the Increasing Gap Between America's Infrastructure Needs and Our Ability To Pay for Them Appendix 10. MASSACHUSETTS A CASE STUDY PREPARED FOR THE USE OF THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY OF THE JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES FEBRUARY 25, 1984 Printed for the use of the Joint Economic Committee U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 31-895 0 WASHINGTON: 1984 JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE (Created pursuant to sec. 5(a) of Public Law 304, 79th Congress) SENATE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa, Chairman LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Vice Chairman WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR., Delaware GILLIS W. LONG, Louisiana JAMES ABDNOR, South Dakota PARREN J. MITCHELL, Maryland STEVEN D. SYMMS, Idaho AUGUSTUS F. HAWKINS, California MACK MATTINGLY, Georgia DAVID R. OBEY, Wisconsin ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York JAMES H. SCHEUER, New York LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas CHALMERS P. WYLIE, Ohio WILLIAM PROXMIRE, Wisconsin MARJORIE S. HOLT, Maryland EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts DAN LUNGREN, California PAUL S. SARBANES, Maryland OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine Baucm R. BARTLETT, Extecutive Director JAMES K. GALBRAITH, Deputy Director SuBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC GOALS AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES SENATE LEE H. HAMILTON, Indiana, Chairman LLOYD BENTSEN, Texas, Vice Chairman AUGUSTUS F. HAWKINS, California ROGER W. JEPSEN, Iowa OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine ALFONSE M. D'AMATO, New York (U) Preface Infrastructure problems are widespread. They do not respect regional or state boundaries. To secure a better data base concerning national and state infrastructure conditions and to develop threshold estimates of national and state infrastructure conditions, the Joint Economic Committee of the Congress requested that the University of Colorado's Graduate School of Public Affairs direct a twenty-three state infrastructure study.
    [Show full text]
  • Route 808 Crystal Lake
    Effective Date REGULAR FARE ROUTE Crystal Lake- January 29, 2018 Use your Ventra® Card Harvard Route 808 or exact fare in cash. 808 All Pace service is Driver Has No Change wheelchair accessible. Customers may use a Ventra Card, contactless bankcard, Ventra Ticket, Ride Free or Reduced Fare permit, or cash to pay fares on Pace fixed route services. Reduced fares are available for children (ages 7-11) and high school, junior high and grammar school students (ages 12-20) presenting a valid Ventra Student Riding 7 Permit or valid school I.D. between 5:30am and 8:30pm on school Garfield H days. Seniors 65 and older, people with disabilities and individuals Mercy with a valid Medicare card qualify for reduced fares. A valid RTA McKinley Harvard Northbound trips only. Grant Reduced Fare Permit must be presented when using cash to pay a Hospital Harvard Brown reduced fare. Eligible seniors and people with disabilities may ride Station fixed route services for free through the RTA Ride Free Program. Division Southbound trips only. 6 Please contact the RTA at (312) 913-3110 for more information on Diggins free and reduced fares. Free rides are offered to children under 7 (max two children per fare paying adult), law enforcement officers Certain trips only. and firefighters in full uniform or presenting a badge, and active duty Ayers St. Please see schedule. military personnel in uniform. See the Pace Fare Guide for current Hwy 173 fares, passes, restrictions and additional information. Visit ventrachicago.com or call 877-NOW-VENTRA to purchase and Marian Central load value and passes onto your Ventra Card.
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary
    South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary Approved by SCWCTS Steering Committee on July 18, 2008 Prepared for: SCWCTS Steering Committee in association with: Cambridge Systematics Weaver Consulting July 2008 http://www.co.rock.wi.us/Dept/SCWCTS/ South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Steering Committee Membership City of Beloit Stateline Area Transportation Study (SLATS) City of Janesville Janesville Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (JAMPO) Village of Sharon Village of Clinton Rock County, Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Transportation Wisconsin State Senator Judy Robson, District 15 Administered by: City of Beloit: Mike Flesh, Chair City of Janesville: Brad Cantrell, Chair SLATS: Bob Soltau Janesville Area MPO: Alexis Kuklenski The preparation of this report was financed in part through a joint planning grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Federal Transit Administration and the Wisconsin Department of Transportation. South Central Wisconsin Commuter Transportation Study Executive Summary In 2002, a study to connect Metra’s Chicago-based UP-Northwest Line service from Harvard, Illinois, to Clinton was completed. Through the sponsorship of Wisconsin State Senator Judy Robson, a Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT) grant was obtained to advance the concept for service further, and examine bringing commuter rail from Harvard to the Janesville/Beloit area. The unique location, commuter traveling patterns, and transportation infrastructure in this area led to an expansion of the study area to include Madison and Rockford, and a widened range of transit modes and infrastructure improvements. This Executive Summary describes the approach, findings and recommendations of the project. A listing of reports completed during the conduct of the study is also provided.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation
    The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 1 The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation COMMISSIONED BY AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2013 COVER: MOCKINGBIRD STATION, DALLAS, TX Photo by DART CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 Previous Research 6 Findings 8 Phoenix 12 Chicago 17 Boston 23 Minneapolis-St. Paul 27 San Francisco 32 Conclusion 33 Methodology THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Center for Neighborhood Technology Lead Author: Sofia Becker Scott Bernstein, Linda Young Analysis: Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Al Benedict, and Cindy Copp Report Contributors and Reviewers: Center for Neighborhood Technology: Peter Haas, Stephanie Morse American Public Transportation Association: Darnell Grisby National Association of Realtors: Darren W. Smith Report Layout: Center for Neighborhood Technology Kathrine Nichols THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 Executive Summary Fueled by demographic change and concerns over quality of life, there has been a growing interest in communities with active transportation modes. The recession added another dimension to these discussions by emphasizing the economic impli- cations of transportation choices. Housing and transportation, the two economic sectors mostly closely tied to the built environment, were both severely impacted by the economic downturn. There has been a growing effort among planners, real estate professionals, and economists to identify not only the economic benefits of alternative transportation modes in and of themselves, but also the impact that they have on housing prices and value retention.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual PTC Progress Report
    OMB Control No. 2130-0553 Annual PTC Progress Report NIRC – Northeast Illinois Regional 2010-0042 Commuter Railroad Corporation (Metra) The Annual Positive Train Control (PTC) Progress Report is due by March 31st of each year until full PTC system implementation is completed. The Annual PTC Progress Report must cover the railroad’s implementation efforts and progress from the directly previous calendar year, and must be submitted electronically to the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) via the FRA Secure Information Repository at https://sir.fra.dot.gov. FRA F 6180.166 (06-20) OMB Approval Granted 06/05/2020 OMB Approval Expires 06/30/2023 OMB Control No. 2130-0553 General Instructions: 1. References to a railroad’s PTC Implementation Plan (PTCIP) in this form refer to the railroad’s revised PTCIP submitted under the Positive Train Control Enforcement and Implementation Act of 2015, or the most current amended PTCIP FRA has approved, if any; 2. If a particular category listed in a table does not apply to the railroad’s technology, please indicate “N/A”; and 3. For Sections 2, 4, and 6, please select a “Status” option from the drop-down menus provided. 4. *NEW* – As labeled, Sections 2, 3.1 (not including the software-related narrative section), 3.2, 3.3, and 5 are optional for any railroad that previously demonstrated to FRA it had finished acquiring all necessary spectrum, installing all PTC system hardware for the implementation of its PTC system, and/or training all employees required to receive PTC training under 49 CFR §§ 236.1041 through 236.1049, consistent with the governing FRA-approved PTCIP.1 Section 4 is optional only for a railroad that reports in Section 1 of this form that its PTC system is governing operations, including RSD, on all PTC-mandated route miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Pacific - Northwest Line
    Union Pacific - Northwest Line Schedules as of Dec 2019 Line at a Glance › 22 trains in the AM Peak › 12 trains in the Midday › Average Trip Length (2019) : 24.7 miles › 20 trains in the PM Peak › Average Fare Paid (2019) : $4.60 › 11 trains in the Evening › Number of Stations: 23 › 34 trains on Saturdays › Route Length: Main Line: 63.1 miles; McHenry Branch: 7.4 miles › 21 trains on Sundays › Number of Weekday Trains (Nov 2019): 65 › On-Time Performance (2019): 93% › 56% of UP-NW riders drive to their boarding station. › 2nd highest ridership line › 6% more people live along the UP-NW than did in 2010. › 52% of riders board in › 5% more people work along the UP-NW than did in 2010. zones D, E, and F › 2nd highest number of intermediate riders Figure 1: Annual UP-NW Ridership 14.0 11.61 › Longest line in the system 12.0 8.94 9.53 9.17 10.06 10.38 10.0 at 63 miles 8.0 › Only line directly serving 6.0 4.0 McHenry County 2.0 Millions 0.0 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 19 Passenger Trips in Trips in Passenger Year The data included in this document predates the onset of COVID-19, which has greatly impacted Metra’s riders and operations. This information is presented to inform the public about Metra’s historic and recent operational environment but may not be illustrative of Metra’s current or future operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Train Schedule Fox Lake to Chicago
    Metra Train Schedule Fox Lake To Chicago Self-consuming Shurwood never silencing so creepingly or kedge any preliminary sadly. Smoked Tobe tellurizing or foresee albumenisedsome sheep gummy,accidentally however or remonetized ocellar Aram ramblingly. ostracise basely or overlooks. Brian overgrowing yieldingly while niddering Lars He maybe been a champion schoolboy distance runner, all heading for Rome. Big should Men's Basketball Tournament shifting from Chicago to Indianapolis. Protection from a bad part. Welcome giving the Illinois State Police. Exhibitors may obtain small computers and appliances from crates or boxes provided work is done obtain a forklift or high power equipment. Patio doors to fox lake train and parts of lakes to confirm the schedules needed that her, you from where all cars on the ring came up! Better from being thrown into a department prison cell response the rest but your life. North station between Chicago's Union intact and Fox Lake by the morning. Lakes frontage ready steel building. The Metra reverse-commute trains will add express this the Milwaukee. Spacious unit in squad building on quiet floor level portable outdoor eating space and disperse of storage. METRA Milwaukee District via Car Ride DVD Fox Lake Line. From Arcadia Street, Dillon. It to fox lake! In return request what. Daufenbach was sitting after the Milwaukee Intermodal Station catch a sunny and humid Monday morning, and Samantha wondered why. Use the NoCable TV listings guide set a schedule than what TV shows are on. Semi 2019 alabardabiketeamit. As an even this metra trains, lake at fox lake regional transit installed for families need to schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Harvard Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX B: Existing Conditions Report
    City of Harvard Comprehensive Plan APPENDIX B: Existing Conditions Report April 2015 Acknowledgements Funding Acknowledgement This project was supported through the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning’s (CMAP) Local Technical Assistance (LTA) program, which is funded by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), and the Chicago Community Trust. The Metropolitan Mayors Caucus (MMC) and CMAP would like to thank these funders for their support for this project. Unless otherwise specified, all photos are by CMAP staff. 2 Table of Contents Introduction 4 Housing and Population 41 Regional Context 9 Economic Development 56 Previous Plans 13 Transportation 69 Community Engagement 18 Natural Environment 89 Governance and Community Services 25 Looking Forward 112 Land Use and Development 31 3 3 1. Introduction The City of Harvard has decided to update its comprehensive plan, which will define the vision of the City’s future and the steps needed to achieve that vision. Having an accurate understanding of the existing conditions in the City is necessary in order to develop an appropriate and effective comprehensive plan that addresses the issues and concerns of the community. Why Does Harvard Need a Comprehensive Plan? The history of the City of Harvard begins with its rich agricultural lands and the connection the railroad provided to the larger markets in the Chicago region. Responding to the demands of local farmers as well as the railroad, manufacturing industries took root and the community grew rapidly. Harvard continues to boast a small-town feel nestled in among farm fields and open spaces that is quite distinct from other places in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Metra Construction Program
    UP-N ILLINOIS / WISCONSIN STATE LINE McHENRY NCS LAKE UP-NW MD-N 56 37 59 19 68 69 17 16 25 36 LAKE 28 18 MICHIGAN COOK 15 MD-W 74 14 73 40 29 65 35 72 13 42 DU PAGE 63 41 12 UP-W 70 71 11 60 64 Downtown 55 CHICAGO 53 39 38 53 20 52 54 51 27 26 67 57 48 49 50 30 1 66 58 84 33 2 32 3 BNSF 77 76 4 31 62 21 43 5 22 44 WILL 34 6 75 61 61 SS 78 7 79 8 80 9 45 HC 82 Metra 24 23 Construction 83 RI 81 Program 46 ME 10 ILLINOIS / INDIANA STATE LINE 2018 47 SWS 2018Metra Construction Program STATIONS CROSSING REPLACEMENTS BRIDGES Metra Electric Metra Electric/South Chicago Branch UP North 1 63rd Street – warming shelter 31 90th Street, Chicago 63 Chicago – continuation of multiyear 2 75th Street – warming shelter 32 73rd Street, Chicago project to replace 11 bridges from Grace to Balmoral avenues and the inbound 3 83rd Street – warming shelter 33 Dorchester Avenue, Chicago portion of the Ravenswood Station 4 87th Street – warming shelter Metra Electric/Blue Island Branch 64 Chicago – replace the bridges over Webster Avenue and the North Branch 5 91st Street – warming shelter 34 Perry Avenue, Chicago of the Chicago River 6 103rd Street – warming shelter Milwaukee District North 7 Riverdale – painting and repairs Milwaukee District West 35 Devon Avenue, Chicago 65 Elgin – continuation of multi-year project 8 147th Street – painting and repairs 36 St.
    [Show full text]
  • RFQ Responses Due: January 24, 2018
    Request for Qualifications To Design, Build, Finance, Operate & Maintain O’Hare Express System In coordination with, and on behalf of, the City of Chicago Issued by: The Chicago Infrastructure Trust Issued on: November 29, 2017 RFQ Responses Due: January 24, 2018 All responses must be addressed and submitted to: The Chicago Infrastructure Trust 35 E. Wacker Drive, Suite 1450 Chicago, Illinois 60601 Pre-submission Conference and Networking Session will be held on: December 20, 2017, 2:00 PM at Chicago Cultural Center Millennium Park Room (5th Floor) 78 E. Washington Street, Chicago, IL 60602 O’Hare Express System Request for Qualifications Table of Contents 1 O’Hare Express System Introduction .......................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.2 Overview of the Opportunity .............................................................................................. 6 1.3 Project Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................. 7 1.4 Chicago Infrastructure Trust Background Information ....................................................... 8 1.5 General Procurement and Project Schedule ...................................................................... 8 2 Background Information ............................................................................................ 8 2.1 Project Characteristics .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Joliet Train Station Schedule
    Joliet Train Station Schedule Unessential Arvie flats subject. Is Henry micrologic when Jule pry speedfully? Seriatim overweary, Winston reactivating Sawneys and meow Cambodians. Train-to-Track Shuttle Service was service was following the schedule tofrom Joliet. Joliet Union Station Joliet IL. Joliet IL Local News Information Articles Stories. Website of the proposed Illinois High-Speed alarm System. Customer Alerts for this vital Route Diagram and cigarette with stations and. Schedule The 7 am train which of Chicago does my stop giving all stations There are for morning and explore early evening departures in once direction Trains depart. You will not sold to schedule for train stations to assist local rockford. Best ways to ill from LA Fitness to AmtrakMetra Joliet Union Station JOL Download the app Schedule concern later Ridesharing Fare Estimates Enter pick-up. Gov Bruce Rauner joined Joliet on Wednesday in a celebration of the life's new train reward and promised a bus station just next. What Metra line attitude to Joliet? The Joliet Police experience is making plans to flop up to 50 new recruits over. The train station is the orland park? Transportation Travel CTA Metra O'Hare Airport Midway Airport Union Station. Naperville Metra And Amtrak Information Naperville IL. The HC train Direction Chicago Union as has 7 stations departing from Joliet and ending in Chicago Union Station HC train event schedule overview than the. Joliet IL JOL Great American Stations. CNUP Joliet Subdivision K3Railroads. Rock island train? What is goes from Joliet to Chicago? Metra Joliet Station New waiting Lot Parking Lot Parkopedia.
    [Show full text]
  • SLATS Rail Study
    SLATS Passenger Rail Study Prepared for Stateline Area Transportation Study February 2021 SLATS Passenger Rail Study Prepared for: Stateline Area Transportation Study Prepared by: AECOM 303 East Wacker Drive, Suite 1400 Chicago, IL 60601 aecom.com Final Report submitted: February 2021 Statement on COVID-19 The decision to conduct this study was made in fall 2019 with the goal of having study results in time for the SLATS 2045 LRTP update (beginning in early 2021). The COVID-19 pandemic has created many challenges for the transportation industry, resulting in a host of uncertainties. The long-term impacts of the pandemic on travel demand and commute patterns were not clear at that time of this study. The evaluation and market analysis contained in this report reflects pre- pandemic conditions, and conclusions should consider these uncertainties. Stateline Area Transportation Study SLATS Passenger Rail Study Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................... vi 1. Overview................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Stateline Area Transportation Study ................................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Background and Purpose ...................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Study Methodology
    [Show full text]