Neurosurg Focus 20 (1):E4, 2006

Tuberous sclerosis complex: molecular pathogenesis and animal models

LEANDRO R. PIEDIMONTE, M.D., IAN K. WAILES, M.D., AND HOWARD L. WEINER, M.D. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York

Mutations in one of two , TSC1 and TSC2, result in a similar disease phenotype by disrupting the normal inter- action of their products, hamartin and tuberin, which form a functional signaling complex. Disruption of these genes in the brain results in abnormal cellular differentiation, migration, and proliferation, giving rise to the charac- teristic brain lesions of complex (TSC) called cortical tubers. The most devastating complications of TSC affect the central nervous system and include epilepsy, mental retardation, autism, and glial tumors. Relevant animal models, including conventional and conditional knockout mice, are valuable tools for studying the normal func- tions of tuberin and hamartin and the way in which disruption of their expression gives rise to the variety of clinical features that characterize TSC. In the future, these animals will be invaluable preclinical models for the development of highly specific and efficacious treatments for children affected with TSC.

KEY WORDS • tuberous sclerosis • pathogenesis • animal model

Tuberous sclerosis complex is an autosomal-dominant zures, mental retardation, and autism.1,51 The number and tumor predisposition syndrome that affects approximately location of cortical tubers and the patient’s age at seizure 1 in 7500 individuals worldwide.19 The TSC is character- onset are highly correlated with neurological outcomes.1,30 ized by benign hamartomatous growths in multiple organs, Epilepsy occurs in approximately 80% of affected indi- including the kidney, skin, retina, lung, and brain. Rarely, viduals. Infants affected with TSC commonly present with malignant tumors, including renal cell carcinoma, can partial motor seizures or infantile spasms within the 1st develop. Although it has been nearly a decade since link- year of life.9 An increase in seizure frequency and severity age analyses first revealed the two genetic loci associated is common during early childhood. With maturity, TSC- with TSC, the mechanism by which disruption of these associated infantile spasms frequently evolve into other seizure types, including partial motor, complex partial, and genes produces associated abnormalities remains poorly 8 understood. The current efforts aimed at developing pre- secondarily generalized ones. Epileptogenic foci identified by electroencephalography frequently correlate with corti- clinical animal models have provided important insights 9,20 into the pathogenesis of TSC and will continue to provide cal tubers visualized on magnetic resonance imaging. In useful tools for studying potential clinical therapies. addition, the progression from infantile spasms to other seizure types might reflect the formation of tubers at dif- ferent times during cortical development. Thus, tubers in CLINICAL ASPECTS areas of the brain that become functionally mature earlier Neurological Manifestations and Brain Lesions can become epileptogenic before tubers located in brain regions that mature more slowly. Finally, due to the prema- Clinically, cortical tubers (pathognomonic lesions) cause turity of the patient, some as young as 20 weeks of gesta- extremely disabling CNS complications, which character- tion, physicians cannot accurately visualize each of these ize the TSC. Tubers are detected as high-intensity signals lesions, thus making the progression of epilepsy in patients that are often located in the junctions between the gray and with TSC extremely difficult to predict. white matter on T2-weighted magnetic resonance images. Tuberous sclerosis complex–associated seizures are The size and location of cortical tubers have been suggest- often refractory to conventional pharmacological therapies.␥ ed to correlate with the major CNS manifestations: sei- Improved seizure control has been achieved using the - aminobutyric acid agonist vigabatrin in some patients with 23 Abbreviations used in this paper: CNS = central nervous system; TSC. Pathological evidence suggests that cortical tubers GDP = guanosine diphosphate; GTP = guanosine triphosphate; represent areas of abnormal differentiation and migration. GTPase = guanosine triphosphatase; mTOR = mammalian target of Nevertheless, because surrounding areas of cortex are not rapamycin; Rheb = Ras homolog enriched in brain; TSC = tuberous disrupted and because tubers often disrupt normal cortical sclerosis complex. lamination, it has been hypothesized that these lesions

Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 1 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC L. R. Piedimonte, I. K. Wailes, and H. L. Weiner result from the defective differentiation, migration, and high frequency of TSC2 mutation might reflect a higher proliferation of a subpopulation of precursor cells (Fig. 1). intrinsic mutation rate for the TSC2 . Tubers contain dysmorphic neurons and an increased Individuals who are born with a mutated copy of the number of astrocytes; thus they are characterized as “giant TSC1 or TSC2 gene in all cells of their bodies are predis- cells.” The cellular origin of these giant cells is unknown; posed to the development of tumors in numerous organs; however, they may arise from a neuroglial precursor cell, this suggests that these genes act as tumor suppressors. Tu- because giant cells often express both mature neuronal and mors develop in these individuals when one or more somat- astrocytic . Many giant cells also express proteins ic cells undergo a “second hit” and the remaining wild-type found in immature CNS cells, including nestin and TSC gene is inactivated. This loss of TSC1 or TSC2 expres- vimentin.6,35 Similarly, the morphological features of giant sion results in abnormal cell growth and proliferation. cells are variable.40 Recent evidence supports the proposal Indeed, hamartomas from patients with both familial and that cells of cortical tubers can undergo active proliferation sporadic forms of the disease have displayed a loss of the and that, despite their early formation, these lesions can be normal copy of TSC1 or TSC2, known as a loss of hetero- 35 zygosity, which indicates that these genes act as classic tu- more dynamic than previously assumed. 24,41,59 In addition to cortical tubers, low-grade astrocytic neo- mor suppressors. In vitro studies have also supported plasms develop in individuals affected with TSC. Subepen- the role of these genes as tumor suppressors. When either tuberin or hamartin is overexpressed in cultured cells, the dymal nodules are benign proliferative lesions that line the 2,37 surface of the lateral ventricles. Unlike the cortical tubers, cells undergo growth arrest. Similarly, downregulation of TSC2 expression in culture fibroblasts by antisense inhi- these lesions are often asymptomatic, but can develop into 54 subependymal giant cell astrocytomas. Although not frank- bition has been shown to increase cell proliferation. Tuberin and hamartin are highly expressed in the CNS of ly malignant, subependymal giant cell astrocytomas can 21,39 cause ventricular obstruction and hydrocephalus, which re- humans and mice in both neurons and glial cells. Both quire neurosurgical intervention.52 In addition to glial cells, of these proteins appear to be required for CNS develop- ment, and tuberin may be essential for neuronal differen- subependymal nodules and subependymal giant cell astro- 53 cytomas can also contain giant cells. These lesions, like cor- tiation. The effect these proteins have in the CNS is prob- tical tubers, are thought to develop early in life and have ably the same as they have where they act as tumor 38 suppressors. This is hypothesized because tuberin expres- been identified as early as 27 weeks of gestation. Like cor- 61 tical tubers, these lesions are thought to arise from abnormal sion is reduced or absent in 30% of sporadic astrocytomas. development of precursor cells during brain formation. There is conflicting evidence whether somatic mutations of the wild-type TSC1 or TSC2 allele in a precursor cell are required for cortical tuber formation in patients who have Genetics and Molecular Pathogenesis 24,41,49 only one normal copy of one of the two TSC genes. Linkage studies have identified two distinct loci that 48 Because these lesions are composed of many different cell undergo mutational inactivation in individuals with TSC. types, it can be difficult to identify the subset of cells that The phenotypic expression of TSC is demonstrated when has undergone a second mutational event. In support of the mutations occur in one of the two genes, TSC1 or TSC2. hypothesis that two genetic “hits” are required for TSC- The TSC1 gene is located on 9q43; this gene contains 23 59 associated tuber formation, recent evidence suggests that, exons and encodes the 130-kD hamartin protein. Hamar- in mice, neuroepithelial cell progenitors that lack TSC2 tin has little to other known proteins. expression have many features of the giant cells found in The TSC2 gene on 16p13 encodes the 180- to 200-kD cortical tubers.42 tuberin protein. Tuberin contains a small region with The two abnormal cellular phenotypes in TSC involve sequence similarity to proteins with GTPase–activating an increase in both cellular proliferation and cell size. In- protein function. The GTPase–activating proteins are mo- sights into how the tuberin–hamartin complex might regu- lecules that negatively regulate small GTPase roteins relat- late this process originated from experiments with Droso- ed to the Ras oncogene. These Ras-like molecules are phila. When the homologs of TSC1 or TSC2 were mutated active when bound to GTP and are inactivated by its con- in flies, organogenesis proceeded normally, but dramatic version to GDP by GTPase. The GTPase proteins acceler- increases in organ size were observed.28,46 These size de- ate the conversion of the GTP–bound active form to the in- fects were attributed to both an increase in cell prolifera- active GDP–bound form by triggering this intrinsic tion, determined by measuring the number of mitotic cells, GTPase activity of Ras and related proteins. and an increase in individual cell size when TSC1 was Both hamartin and tuberin contain predicted coil–coil mutated.46 Overexpression of both TSC1 and TSC2 in these domains that mediate their interaction to form the flies reversed these defects. Because the insulin–signaling tuberin–hamartin protein complex.45,60 The formation of pathway has been linked to the regulation of cell growth this complex is critical for tuberin and hamartin functions, and proliferation,56 the possibility that the tuberin–hamartin and TSC-associated mutations frequently disrupt this inter- complex might regulate this signaling pathway seemed action and render the tuberin–hamartin complex function- plausible. In support of this hypothesis, overexpression of ally inactive. Identified TSC gene mutations include mis- TSC1 or TSC2 reinstated lethality in Drosophila mutants in sense and nonsense mutations, in-frame deletions, and which the insulin receptor was nonfunctional; it also re- large deletions.25,34 Whereas familial cases of TSC have an versed the cell proliferation defects in flies that overex- approximately equal distribution in families with TSC1 and pressed the insulin receptor.15,26,46 TSC2 mutations, TSC2 mutations are approximately four Additional studies, first in Drosophila and then in mam- times more common in sporadic cases.4,34 Because two malian cells, indicated that the tuberin–hamartin complex thirds of all patients with TSC have sporadic mutations, the functions in the insulin-like growth factor receptor pathway

2 Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC Tuberous sclerosis complex

Fig. 1. Schematic showing how cellular differentiation in the CNS is altered by inactivation of the tuberin–hamartin complex. During development, neurons and astrocytes arise from neuroglial precursors. Giant cells that express a variety of cellular markers, including those characteristic of immature nervous system cells, are found in CNS lesions associat- ed with TSC. This suggests that tuberin–hamartin complex inactivation interferes with the normal maturation of precur- sor cells and impairs their differentiation into more mature neurons and astrocytes. The black stars symbolize tuberin– hamartin complex inactivation. downstream of phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase and Akt (Fig. binding protein–1, whereas overexpression of TSC1 or 2). This pathway is known to regulate both cell prolifera- TSC2 inhibits S6 kinase pathway hyperactivation.27,33,42,57 tion and cell size. When the insulin receptor is activated, Phosphorylation of S6 kinase also increases in cells that phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase is recruited to the membrane express a TSC2 gene containing a human TSC gene muta- and triggers the production and release of the second mes- tion.17 senger phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate. Activation The mechanism by which the tuberin–hamartin complex of Akt, a serine/threonine kinase, is effected by phospha- regulates mTOR, however, remained unclear until Rheb, tidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate, and Akt has been shown a Ras-like GTPase, was identified as a target of tuberin to phosphorylate tuberin, resulting in its dissociation from GTPase-activating protein activity in Drosophila.17,64 The hamartin and inactivation of the tuberin–hamartin com- 11,47 Rheb molecule is required for cell-cycle progression and plex. cell growth in Drosophila.44 In the presence of the tuberin– The functional tuberin–hamartin complex normally in- hamartin complex, the GTP bound to Rheb is hydrolyzed hibits the activity of the mTor.16,27,42,57 Nevertheless, when to GDP, resulting in Rheb inactivation. When the tuber- the tuberin–hamartin complex is inactivated by Akt-medi- in–hamartin complex is inactivated, either by Akt-mediat- ated phosphorylation of tuberin, mTOR inhibition is ed tuberin phosphorylation or genetic mutation, Rheb is relieved. Activation of mTOR has been shown to trigger constitutively active, resulting in upregulation of mTOR- the phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 kinase and factor 4E dependent pathways, thereby increasing cell size. In this re- binding protein–1.14,18 The activation of these proteins re- gard, increased S6 kinase phosphorylation in Rheb-overex- pressing cells can be blocked by treatment with rapamycin, sults in an increase in protein synthesis and, ultimately, cell 3 growth. In cells in which the tuberin–hamartin complex is a drug that inhibits the mTOR pathway. permanently inactivated due to a genetic mutation, in- Although all functions of Rheb in mammalian cells are creased levels of phosphorylated S6 kinase and factor 4E not understood, it is known that posttranslational farnesyla- binding protein–1 are constitutively present, resulting in tion of Rheb is required for its activity and cell-cycle pro- unregulated cell growth. Several research groups have gression.5 In this regard, farnesyltransferase inhibitors that demonstrated that TSC1 and TSC2 mutant cells have ele- block the posttranslational activation of Rheb have been vated levels of phosphorylated S6 kinase and factor 4E shown to inhibit mTOR dependent S6 kinase activity.3 The

Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 3 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC L. R. Piedimonte, I. K. Wailes, and H. L. Weiner

Fig. 2. Schematic showing mechanisms for cell growth and proliferation. To relieve the tuberin–hamartin complex- mediated inhibition of cell size and proliferation, phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase (PI3k) and Akt are activated after stimu- lation of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) receptor. The Akt phosphorylates tuberin, inactivating the complex and result- ing in increased cell size and proliferation. The tuberin–hamartin complex negatively regulates Rheb, a small GTPase molecule that activates the mTOR/S6 kinase (S6K)/factor 4E binding protein (4E-BP)–1 signaling cascade, which is important for the regulation of cell size and proliferation. In addition, the tuberin–hamarin complex may regulate the expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1, which is involved in both cell growth and size control. mechanism by which Rheb regulates mTOR is not under- animal models were made using Eker rats; these animals stood and is presently an area of active investigation. carry a spontaneous germline mutation in the rat homolog In addition to its effects on cell size, Rheb overexpres- of the human TSC2 gene and have been used as a model of Dro- hereditary renal cell carcinoma.63 These rats develop bilat- sion resulted in an increase in cell proliferation in 62 sophila.50,55 Nevertheless, it is not known if this effect of eral renal tumors and subependymal nodules. Unfortu- Rheb is mTOR dependent. In mammalian cells, cyclin-de- nately, genetic manipulations of rats have been hampered by a lack of suitable methods for generating targeted muta- pendent kinases are required for the transition from a quies- 29 cent state to one of active proliferation. Inhibitory mole- tions. In contrast, methods for generating mice with dis- cules, such as p27kip1, regulate these kinases. The expression ease-associated genetic changes are well established and kip1 have been widely used to study of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 is reduced in 36 cells in which TSC1 or TSC2 expression is decreased.53,58 function. Not only does the use of transgenic mice allow Tuberin can regulate nuclear localization of p27kip1 because analysis of disruption or overexpression of single genes, the molecule is mislocalized to the cytoplasm in tuberin- but these mice can be interbred to assess the effects of mul- deficient fibroblasts.53 Moreover, inactivation of p27kip1 in tiple genetic changes. In this way, these genetically engi- mice is associated with increases in both cell size and pro- neered mice can serve as useful preclinical models for the liferation.13 Still, it is not clear whether Rheb or mTOR is study of disease pathophysiology and potential therapies. kip1 required for regulation of p27 expression. Initial attempts to recapitulate the human TSC phenotype in mice were performed using conventional knockout mice ANIMAL MODELS in which germline expression of TSC1 or TSC2 was inacti- vated. Mice that are homozygous for loss of TSC1 or TSC2 Despite the advances that Drosophila genetic and in die in midembryogenesis of apparent cardiac malformations 31–33 vitro systems brought to the understanding of the signaling and liver hypoplasia, whereas heterozygous animals areϩրϪ activities involving these proteins, a more desirable viable but develop renal and liver tumors. The TSC2ϩ Ϫ approach is now used. This technique is used to analyze the mice developed tumors at younger ages than TSC1 / ani- signaling and developmental roles of tuberin and hamartin mals. This finding is interesting in light of the observation by using in vivo animal models, with the molecules studied that patients who harbor TSC2 mutations often present with both individually and as a protein complex. Initially, the more severe diseases than those with TSC1 mutations.10 In

4 Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC Tuberous sclerosis complex

ϩրϪ ϩրϪ the CNS of TSC2 and TSC1 mice, the numbers of as- lography in 34 children with tuberous sclerosis. Epilepsia 31: trocytes were increased, a finding that suggests that ha- 747–755, 1990 10. Dabora SL, Joswiak S, Franz DN, et al: Mutational analysis in martin and tuberin are important astrocyte growthϩրϪ regula- 58 TSC2 a cohort of 224 tuberous sclerosis patients indicates increased tors. When grown in vitro, however, astrocytes severity of TSC2, compared with TSC1, disease in multiple or- did not demonstrate a cell autonomous growth advantage. kip1 gans. Am J Hum Genet 68:64–80, 2001 Expression of the ϩրϪcell cycle–associated protein p27 was 11. Dan HC, Sun M, Yang L, et al: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/ reduced in TSC2 astrocytes compared with wild-type Akt pathway regulates tuberous sclerosis tumor suppressor com- ones, which has led to the suggestion that tuberin might reg- J Biol Chem 4: kip1 58 plex by phosphorylation of tuberin. 35364–35370, ulate cell growth via regulation of p27 expression. In 2002 addition, compound heterozygotes that lacked one copy of 12. European 16 Tuberous Sclerosis Consortium: Iden- both TSC1 and TSC2 exhibited further increases in the num- tification and characterization of the tuberous sclerosis gene on ber of astrocytes. Together, these observations support the . Cell 75:1305–1315,1993 role of tuberin and hamartin as regulators of cell growth and 13. Fero ML, Rivkin M, Tasch M, et al: A syndrome of multiorgan hyperplasia with features of gigantism, tumorigenesis and fe- proliferation for the CNS. male sterility in p27(Kip1)-deficient mice. Cell 85:733–744, 1996 14. Fingar DC, Salama S, Tsou C, et al: Mammalian cell size is con- CONCLUSIONS trolled by mTOR and its downstream targets S6K1 and 4EBP1/ eIF4E. Genes Dev 16:1472–1487, 2002 In the last several years, much has been learned about the 15. Gao X, Pan D: TSC1 and TSC2 tumor suppressors antagonize cellular functions of the TSC1 and TSC2 genes and the pro- insulin signaling in cell growth. Genes Dev 15:1383–1392, teins they encode. An improved understanding of the mol- 2001 ecular pathogenesis of TSC is critical to the development of 16. Gao X, Zhang Y, Arrazola P, et al: Tsc tumor suppressor pro- effective, highly specific therapies. Rapamycin, a specific teins antagonize aminoacid-TOR signaling. Nat Cell Biol 4: inhibitor of mTOR, is currently being tested in clinical can- 699–704, 2002 cer trials and might prove to be useful in some TSC-relat- 17. Garami A, Zwartkruis FJT, Nobukuni T, et al: Insulin activation ed tumors, including those that affect the CNS. Similarly, of Rheb, a mediator of mTOR/S6K/4E-BP signaling is inhibit- farnesyltransferase inhibitors are used clinically as antineo- ed by TSC1 and 2. Mol Cell 11:1457–1466, 2003 18. Gingras A, Kennedy SG, O’Leary MA, et al: 4E-PB1, a repres- plastic agents. These drugs might prove useful in disrupt- sor of mRNA translation, is phosphorylated and inactivated by ing the constitutive activation of Rheb that occurs in cells the Akt (PKB) signaling pathway. Genes Dev 12:502–513, 1998 lacking tuberin–hamartin complex function. The develop- 19. Gomez MR, Sampson JR, Whitemore VH (eds): Tuberous ment of mouse models that accurately recapitulate features Sclerosis Complex, ed 3: New York, Oxford University Press, of the human disease will facilitate our understanding of 1999 the pathogenesis of developmental defects and tumor for- 20. Goodman M, Lamm SH, Engel A, et al: Cortical tuber count: a mation associated with TSC. These models will also bring biomarker indicating neurologic severity of tuberous sclerosis to light new pharmacological targets that can be exploited complex. J Child Neurol 12:85–90, 1997 for the development of specific and efficacious therapies 21. Gutmann DH, Zhang Y, Hasbani MJ, et al: Expression of the for patients affected with TSC. tuberous sclerosis complex gene products, hamartin and tuber- in, in central nervous system tissues. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 99:223–230, 2000 References 22. Haluska P, Dy GK, Adjei AA: Farnesyl transferase inhibitors as anticancer agents. Eur J Cancer 38:1685–1700, 2002 1. Asano E, Chugani DC, Muzic O, et al: Autism in tuberous scle- 23. Hancock E, Osborne JP: Vigabatrin in the treatment of infantile rosis complex is related to both cortical and subcortical dys- spasms in tuberous sclerosis: literature review. J Child Neurol function. Neurology 51:1269–1277, 2001 41:71–74, 1999 2. Benvenuto G, Li S, Brown SJ, et al: The tuberous sclerosis-1 24. Henske EP, Scheithauer BW, Short MP, et al: Allelic loss is fre- (TSC1) gene product hamartin suppresses cell growth and aug- quent in tuberous sclerosis kidney lesions but rare in brain le- ments the expression of the TSC2 product tuberin by inhibiting sions. Am J Hum Genet 59:400–406, 1996 Oncogen 19: its ubiquitination. 6306–6316, 2000 25. Hodges AK, Li S, Maynard J, et al: Pathologic mutations in 3. Castro AF, Rebhun JF, Clark GJ, et al: Rheb binds tuberous TSC1 and TSC2 disrupt the interaction between hamartin and sclerosis complex 2 (TSC2) and promotes S6 kinase activation tuberin. Hum Mol Genet 10:2899–2905, 2001 in a rapamycin- and farnesylation-dependent manner. J Biol 26. Huang H, Potter CJ, Tao W, et al: PTEN affects cell size, cell Chem 278:32493–32496, 2003 proliferation, and apoptosis during Drosophila eye develop- 4. Cheadle JP, Reeve MP, Sampson JR, et al: Molecular genetic ment. Development 126:5365–5372, 1999 advances in tuberous sclerosis. Hum Genet 107:97–114, 2000 27. Inoki K, Li Y, Zhu T, et al: TSC2 is phosphorylated and inhib- 5. Clark GJ, Kinch MS, Rogers-Graham K, et al: The Ras-related ited by Akt and suppresses mTOR signaling. Nat Cell Biol 4: protein Rheb is farnesylated and antagonizes Ras signaling and 648–657, 2002 transformation. J Biol Chem 272:10608–10615, 1997 28. Ito N, Rubin GM: gigas, a Drosophila homolog of tuberous scle- 6. Crino PB, Trojanowski JQ, Dichter MA, et al: Embryonic neu- rosis gene product-2, regulates the cell cycle. Cell 96:529–539, ronal markers in tuberous sclerosis: single cell molecular path- 1999 ology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:14152–14157, 1996 29. Jacob HJ, Kwitek AE: Rat genetics attaching physiology and 7. Curatolo P: Neurological manifestations of tuberous sclerosis pharmacology to the genome. Nat Rev Genet 3:33–42, 2002 complex. Childs Nerv Syst 12:515–521, 1996 30. Joinson C, O’Callaghan FJ, Osborne JP, et al: Learning disabil- 8. Curatolo P, Seri S, Verdecchia M, et al: Infantile spasms in tu- ity and epilepsy in an epidemiological sample of individuals berous sclerosis complex. Brain Dev 23:502–507, 2001 with tuberous sclerosis complex. Psychol Med 33:335–344, 9. Cusmai R, Chiron C, Curatolo P, et al: Topographic compara- 2003 tive study of magnetic resonance imaging and electroencepha- 31. Kobayashi T, Minowa O, Kuno J, et al: Renal carcinogenesis,

Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 5 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC L. R. Piedimonte, I. K. Wailes, and H. L. Weiner

hepatic hemangiomatosis, and embryonic lethality caused by a growth as component of the insulin/TOR signaling network. germ-line Tsc2 mutation in mice. Cancer Res 59:1206–1211, Nat Cell Biol 5:566–571, 2003 1999 51. Shepherd CW, Houser OW, Gomez MR: MR findings in tuber- 32. Kobayashi T, Minowa O, Sugitani Y, et al: A germ-line Tsc1 mu- ous sclerosis complex and correlation with seizure development tation causes tumor development and embryonic lethality that and mental impairment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16:149–155, are similar, but not identical to, those caused by Tsc2 mutation in 1995 mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8762–8767, 2001 52. Shepherd CW, Scheithauer BW, Gomez MR, et al: Subepen- 33. Kwiatkowski DJ: Tuberous sclerosis: from tubers to mTOR. dymal giant cell astrocytoma: a clinical, pathologic, and flow Ann Hum Genet 67:87–96, 2003 cytometry study. Neurosurgery 28:864–868, 1991 34. Kwiatkowski DJ, Zhang H, Bandura JL, et al: A mouse model 53. Soucek T, Holzl G, Bernaschek G, et al: A role of the tuberous of TSC1 reveals sex-dependent lethality from liver hemangio- sclerosis gene-2 product during neuronal differentiation. Onco- mas and upregulation of p70S6 kinase activity in TSC1 null gene 16:2197–2204, 1998 cells. Hum Mol Genet 11:525–534, 2002 54. Soucek T, Pusch O, Wienecke R, et al: Role of the tuberous 35. Lee A, Maldonado M, Baybis M, et al: Markers of cellular pro- sclerosis gene-2 product in cell cycle control. Loss of the tuber- liferation are expressed in cortical tubers. Ann Neurol 53: ous sclerosis gene-2 induces quiescent cells to enter S phase. J 668–673, 2003 Biol Chem 272:29301–29308, 1997 36. Macleod KF, Jacks T: Insights into cancer from trangenic 55. Stocker H, Hafen E: Genetic control of cell size. Curr Opin mouse models. J Pathol 187:43–60, 1999 Genet Dev 10:529–535, 2000 37. Miloloza A, Rosner M, Nellist M, et al: The TSC1 gene prod- 56. Stocker H, Radimerski T, Schindelholz B, et al: Rheb is an es- uct, hamartin, negatively regulates cell proliferation. Hum Mol sential regulator of S6K in controlling cell growth in Droso- Genet 9:1721–1727, 2000 phila. Nat Cell Biol 5:559–565, 2003 38. Mirkin LD, Ey EH, Chaparro M: Congenital subependymal 57. Tee AR, Fingar DC, Manning BD, et al: Tuberous sclerosis com- giant-cell astrocytoma: case report with prenatal ultrasonogram. plex-1 and -2 gene products function together to inhibit mam- Pediatr Radiol 29:776–780, 1999 malian target of rapamycin (mTOR)-mediated downstream sig- 39. Mizuguchi M, Kato M, Yamanouchi H, et al: Tuberin immuno- naling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:13571–13576, 2002 histochemistry in brain, kidneys and heart with or without tu- 58. Uhlmann EJ, Apicelli AJ, Baldwin RL, et al: Heterozygosity for berous sclerosis. Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 94:525–531, 1997 the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) gene products results in 40. Mizuguchi M, Takashima S: Neuropathology of tuberous scle- increased astrocyte numbers and decrease p27-kip1 expression rosis. Brain Dev 23:508–515, 2001 in TSC2+/-cells. Oncogene 21:4050–4059, 2002 41. Niida Y, Stemer-Rachamimov AO, Logrip M, et al: Survey of 59. van Slegtenhorst M, de Hoogt R, Hermans C, et al: Identifica- somatic mutations in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) hamar- tion of the tuberous sclerosis gene TSC1 on chromosome 9q34. tomas suggests different genetic mechanisms for pathogenesis Science 277:805–808, 1997 of TSC lesions. Am Hum Genet 69:493–503, 2001 60. van Slegtenhorst M, Nellist M, Nagelkerken B, et al: Interaction 42. Onda H, Crino PB, Zhang H, et al: TSC2 null murine neuroep- between hamartin and tuberin, the TSC1 and TSC2 gene prod- ithelial cells are a model for human tuber giant cells, and show ucts. Hum Mol Genet 7:1053–1057, 1998 activation of an mTOR pathway. Mol Cell Neurosci 21: 61. Wienecke R, Guha A, Maize JC Jr, et al: Reduced TSC2 RNA 561–574, 2002 and protein in sporadic astrocytomas and ependymomas. Ann 43. Park SH, Pepkowitz SH, Kerfoot C, et al: Tuberous sclerosis in Neurol 42:230–235, 1997 a 20-week gestation fetus: immunohistochemical study. Acta 62. Yeung RS, Katsetos CD, Klein-Szanto: Subependymal astro- Neuropathol (Berl) 94:180–186, 1997 cytic hamartomas of the Eker rat model of tuberous sclerosis. 44. Patel PH, Thapar N, Guo L, et al: Drosophila Rheb GTPase is Am J Pathol 151:1477–1486, 1997 required for cell cycle progression and growth control. J Cell 63. Yeung RS, Xiao GH, Jin F, et al: Predisposition to renal carci- Sci 116:3601–3610, 2003 noma in Eker rat is determined by germ-line mutation of the 45. Plank TL, Yeung RS, Henske EP: Hamartin, the product of the tuberous sclerosis (TSC2) gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91: tuberous sclerosis 1 (TSC1) gene, interacts with tuberin and ap- 11413–11416, 1994 pears to be localized to cytoplasmic vesicles. Cancer Res 58: 64. Zhang Y, Gao X, Saucedo LJ, et al: Rheb is a direct target of the 4766–4770, 1998 tuberous sclerosis tumor supressor proteins. Nat Cell Biol 5: 46. Potter CJ, Huang H, Xu T: Drosophila Tsc1 functions with Tsc2 578–581, 2003 to antagonize insulin signaling regulating cell growth, cell pro- liferation and organ size. Cell 105:357–368, 2001 47. Potter CJ, Pedraza LG, Xu T: Akt regulates growth by directly phosphorylating Tsc2. Nat Cell Biol 4:658–665, 2002 48. Povey S, Burley MW, Attwood J, et al: Two loci for tuberous sclerosis: one on 9q34 and one on 16p13. Ann Hum Genet Manuscript received December 2, 2005. 58:107–127, 1994 Accepted in final form December 9, 2005. 49. Ramesh V: Aspects of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) pro- Address reprint requests to: Howard L. Weiner, M.D., F.A.A.P., tein function in the brain. Biochem Soc Trans 31:579–583, Department of Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, New York University 2003 School of Medicine, 317 East 34th Street, New York, New York 50. Saucedo LJ, Gao X, Chiarelli DA, et al: Rheb promotes cell 10016. email: [email protected].

6 Neurosurg. Focus / Volume 20 / January, 2006 Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/26/21 03:25 PM UTC