262 Some Cheyenne Consonant Alternations: Synchronic and Diachronic Views Wayne Leman Summer Institute of Linguistics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

262 Some Cheyenne Consonant Alternations: Synchronic and Diachronic Views Wayne Leman Summer Institute of Linguistics 262 Some Cheyenne Consonant Alternations: Synchronic and Diachronic Views Wayne Leman Summer Institute of Linguistics 1. Introduction Several interesting consonant alternations occur in Cheyenne. Some find their sources of alternation in Proto- Algonquian. Others are apparently unique to Cheyenne. A preliminary inventory of Cheyenne phonemes is: p, t, (c), k, ?, s, s, (x), h, v, m, n, a, e, o. Disputed elements are parenthesized. This list is essentially that of Davis (1962)1 minus his voiceless m and n. Vowels are either phonemically high- or low-pitched. Pitch sandhi rules adjust phonemic pitches yielding five phonetic pitches (Leman, in press): raised high=*, high=', mid=~, lowered high=v, and low=v or unmarked. Vowels devoice (') predictably (Leman and Rhodes 1978). 2 . Status of c Frantz (1972) removed c (orthographic tjs) from the list of Cheyenne phonemes. It is an allophone of (1) /t/ by dissibilation of /t/ to c (orthographic ts_) , then assimilation of this affricate to a following s_ or k, or of (2) /k/ by palatalization and affrication of /k/ to c, apparently as a relic of Cheyenne male speech. Note these processes below (disregard, for now, other details of the "derivations", such as pitch sandhi processes): (1) /etehke?6/ > etsehke?o > etseske?o > etseske?o [fc-ki?6] 'It is little.' /ete?kehahe/ > etse?kehahe > etse?kehahe [fci?kfhah] 'He is young.' (2) /hohkeha?e/ > hohkeha?e [h6hkhya?i] ~ h6htseha?e [hohchya?i] 'hat' 3. Allophones of /h/ The phoneme /h/ can be shown to have the preconsonantal allophones [h], [s], [s], and [x]. Note the allophonic alternations, below, with the past-tense morpheme /-h-/ which occurs immediately following the third person prefix /e-/: (3) emane 'He drank. He is drinking.' ehmane 'He drank.' esto?e 'He got up (from bed).' essevano 'He skated.' eskoka?a?xe 'He jumped.' esseese 'He was prostrate.' exho?soo?e 'He danced.' exxaa?e 'He urinated.' 263 The basic process here is one in which /h/ assimilates (or dissimilates) to a following consonant. The advantages of treating these alternations as allophanic were recognized by oavis (1962), basically working within a structuralist framework, and by Frantz (1972), working within the frame­ work of generative phonology. Some versions of structuralist (classical) phonology would, of course, require calling the alternations in (3) "morphophonemic" since h, s, s, and x can be shown to contrast in some intervocalic-environments. 2 In this paper, however, I shall regard alternations that can be accounted for purely on phonetic grounds, such as those of (3), as being "allophanic", even if the segments involved are in clear phonemic contrast in some other environments. I shall reserve the term "morphophonemic" for alternations for which we require at least some reference to morphological (grammatical) information. 4. Status of x Davis and Frantz observed certain restrictions on the occurrence of s and x. Davis (1962:37) correctly stated that "s never occurs-preceding a vowel other than e." Frantz (1972:13) formulated a rule stating that s is backed to ~preceding ~ and ~, equivalent to rule (7) below. 4.1 It can be seen from examples such as (4)-(6) that s and ~ regularly alternate. (4) ne~e 'two (of)' ne~a ' two (times) ' eneseo?o 'They (animate) are two in number.' ene~6ho 'They (obviative) are two in number.' 'They (inanimate) are two in number.' (Sl se?se 'duck' se?~o 'duck(s) (obv.)' ( 6) e6neseotse 'He is in pain. ' e6ne:§:e6hta6htse 'His leg hurts. ' ('leg' (medial)= / -6hta/) e6nexase6htse 'He has a bellyache.' ('belly' (med.) =/-ase/) e6nex6hta6h tse 'He has a stomach ache.' ('stomach' (med.) =/-ohta/) S occurs only before e, while x occurs only before ~ or ~, that is, only before a [+back]-vowel. We, therefore, can formulate rule (7): (7) ~-Backing (regressive) 3 V s + X I (?) [+back] 264 4.2 Other forms (8)-(11) show that there is also a progressive s-Backing rule (12): (8) eoveSe 'He lay down, went to bed. ' eheamaxe •He lay on his side.' ehaoenaxe 'He prayed lying down.' (9) nemaese 'You barked at me.'1* nemeoxe 'You fought me.' (10) nee?ese 'You sliced me.' nea?taxe 'You accidentally cut me.' (11) nee?se 'You are afraid of me.' neho?xe 'You have me.' Following a [+back] vowel, s is backed to x: (12) s-Backing (progressive) v * / r (?) [+back' 4.3 Now, notice how similar rules (7) and (12) are. They are the same, except for the difference as to whether the conditioning vowel precedes or follows the segment to be conditioned. Because of this, it would be advantageous if we could collapse the regressive (7) and progressive (12) assimilation rules into one single assimilation rule (13): (13) s-Backing (?) x / V [+back] Rule (13) simply says that /s/ will be backed to x if it is preceded or foil owed (or both preceded and followed) by a [ -tback ] vowel . Neighborhood rules have a particularl y dubious status in phonological theory. There have been ma ny putative neigh- borhood rules which, upon closer examina tion, are found to be treated better as separate rules. Th ere is at least one complication of Cheye nne data that could cast doubt on the wisdom of collapsing (7) and (12) to the neighborhood rule (13). Progressive s Backing is blocked at a preverb boundary. Regressive s-Backing applies anywhere in a form. Note that the a of /ni.-/ 'first perso n prefix', the second a of /-saa-/ negative preverb', and the o of /mo-/ 'dubitative prefix' d o not cause backing of a following (14) naseese /s/, as seen in (14) 'I am prostrate.' nasaasdenohe 'I did not rob him. moseseotsehehe 'He must be free.' 265 The /s/'s in question occur immediately following a preverb boundary. It remains to be seen whether this exception to progressive assimilation is serious enough to keep us from capturing the facts of s-Backing in a single neighborhood assimilation rule. 4.4 There are a few lexical items which are potentially troublesome for our statement of progressive s-Backing. They can, however, be shown not to be exceptions to rule (12), after all. The verb for 'it is brown' is emoseskano. Superficially, it would appear that we have a case of a [+back] vowel, o, followed by s which should have backed to x according to- (12). But we must note that speakers alternate the pronunciation emoseskano with emoseskano. We know from other data that one phonemic ("phonemic" in the sense used in this paper) source of s is /s/. For instance, note (15) and (16) : (15) nemane?sese 'You (sg.) made me drink.' (16) nemane?seseme 'You (pi.) made me drink.' The first s of (16) is derived from /s/, as seen by comparison with (15), by assimilation to the following /s/. We now can conclude that the phonemic spelling of 'it is brown' is /emosehkano/. The pronunciation emoseskano is slightly closer to the phonemic spelling than is the alternate pronunciation emoseskano. The same two lines of argumentation allow us to conclude that the phonemic spelling for 'that's all, that's the end of the story' enehe?estosese ~ enehe?estosese is /enehe?ehtosese/. An AI final meaning 'to drink' is phonetically [asi?si]. It is spelled orthographically as -ase?se in Leman (1979: 157). There is, however, the possibility of spelling the final phonemically as /-ahse?se/ (Rhodes, personal communi­ cation) . (The /h/ preceding /s/ would prevent progressive s-Backing from occurring.) Whether by accident or design, that was the approach taken to spell one of the forms having this final, in the English-Cheyenne Student Dictionary (1976:135) . 'He's drunk' is spelled there as e-nono?tova-hse?se5. (However, the word for 'soda pop (cold drink)' in this dictionary (1976:104) was not written with an hs cluster in the AI final 'to drink', but, instead, with a single segment £6 . ) An hs cluster in this AI final would at first look unusual7, but its presence in phonemic spellings is not unprecedented. There is already a precedent for /h/ preceding /s/ in words containing a morpheme-final /h/ preceding root-initial /s/, e.g. (17) /e-h-seese/ esseese 'He (past tense) was prostrate.' (18) /mah-seseotet/ masseseotsestse 'when he is free' 266 4.5 When all the facts are considered, I am led to say that x is not a phoneme of Cheyenne. It is, instead, an allophone of /s/, or of /h/ by dissibilation in an /hh/ or /hx/ cluster, or of /h/ by assimilation in an /hs/ or /hs/ cluster. This reduces the phonemic inventory of Cheyenne to 13 segments: p, t, k, 7_, s_, s, h, v, m, n, a, e, o, plus a phoneme of pitch.T 5. Phonemic assignments Building upon the discussion above, and upon data and rules in Leman (1979), we can now observe some of the intricacies of Cheyenne phonemic assignment (19) . (19) Cheyenne phonemic assignments /W > [h].[si , s], [x] (See §3, above.) /s/ > [s],[s i (See §4.4, above. /£/ > [S],rx i A/ > [t], [te], [ts] (See §4, above.) A/ > [k]. [ts] (See §2, above.) (See §2, above.) It is important to notice that a Cheyenne phone can have more than one phonemic source: (20) Multiple phonemic sources [s] < /s/, /h/, /s/ [x] < /h/, /s/ [s] < /s/, /h/ [ts] < /t/, /k/ One must be careful, when phonemicizing, that phones are assigned to the proper phonemes. Study of the lexicon and of alternations within paradigms enables one to make these assignments without too much difficulty. 6. Diachronic support Finding x to be an allophone of s has strong diachronic support. Note the PA *s sources foF both s and x in the Cheyenne forms below.
Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    August-September 2015 Edition 4 _____________________________________________________________________________________ We’re excited to share the positive work of tribal nations and communities, Native families and organizations, and the Administration that empowers our youth to thrive. In partnership with the My Brother’s Keeper, Generation Indigenous (“Gen-I”), and First Kids 1st Initiatives, please join our First Kids 1st community and share your stories and best practices that are creating a positive impact for Native youth. To highlight your stories in future newsletters, send your information to [email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Youth Highlights II. Upcoming Opportunities & Announcements III. Call for Future Content *************************************************************************************************** 1 th Sault Ste. Marie Celebrates Youth Council’s 20 Anniversary On September 18 and 19, the Sault Ste. Marie Tribal Youth Council (TYC) 20-Year Anniversary Mini Conference & Celebration was held at the Kewadin Casino & Convention Center. It was a huge success with approximately 40 youth attending from across the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians service area. For the past 20 years, tribal youth grades 8-12 have taken on Childhood Obesity, Suicide and Bullying Prevention, Drug Abuse, and Domestic Violence in their communities. The Youth Council has produced PSAs, workshops, and presentations that have been done on local, tribal, state, and national levels and also hold the annual Bike the Sites event, a 47-mile bicycle ride to raise awareness on Childhood Obesity and its effects. TYC alumni provided testimony on their experiences with the youth council and how TYC has helped them in their walk in life. The celebration continued during the evening with approximately 100 community members expressing their support during the potluck feast and drum social held at the Sault Tribe’s Culture Building.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing the Story of the Cheyenne People to the Children of Today Northern Cheyenne Social Studies Units Northern Cheyenne Curriculum Committee 2006
    Indian Education for All Bringing the Story of the Cheyenne People to the Children of Today Northern Cheyenne Social Studies Units Northern Cheyenne Curriculum Committee 2006 Ready - to - Go Grant Elsie Arntzen, Superintendent • Montana Office of Public Instruction • www.opi.mt.gov LAME DEER SCHOOLS NORTHERN CHEYENNE SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction & Curriculum Framework ........................................................................3 Core Understandings & Learning Objectives ...............................................................8 Glossary for Lesson Content .......................................................................................17 Northern Cheyenne Recommended Grade Level Content ..........................................21 Northern Cheyenne Social Studies Model Lessons Grades 1-12 With Northern Cheyenne Content Resources .........................................................23 APPENDIX Pertinent Web Sites ....................................................................................................... 2 Protocol for Guest Speakers.......................................................................................... 3 Day of the Visit ............................................................................................................. 4 Chronology of Northern Cheyenne Government (Board Approved) .......................... 5 Amended Constitution & Bylaws of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe ............................ 9 Treaties with the Northern Cheyenne Tribe ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis of Obviation in Algonquian Languages
    A Synthesis of Obviation in Algonquian Languages by Irina Volchok A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Linguistics University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright© 2019 Irina Volchok iii Abstract One of the most prominent features of the Algonquian languages of North America is obviation, a third person referencing system. Although it has been known for nearly 400 years, linguists are still debating about its role and function. This work seeks to synthesize what is already known about obviation and what is still unresolved. More specifically, it looks at the syntactic and discourse working principles of obviation in different types of noun phrases, and in single, conjoined, complement, and adverbial clauses, as well as in narratives and in elicitation. iv Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... iv Chapter I: Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Geographical Location of Algonquian Languages ................................................................ 1 1.2 Classification of Algonquian Languages ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe Trail
    Santa Fe Trail THE OLD SANTA FE TRAIL The Story of a Great Highway By COLONEL HENRY INMAN Late Assistant Quartermaster, United States Army With a Preface by W. F. "BUFFALO BILL" CODY PREFACE. As we look into the open fire for our fancies, so we are apt to study the dim past for the wonderful and sublime, forgetful of the fact that the present is a constant romance, and that the happenings of to-day which we count of little importance are sure to startle somebody in the future, and engage the pen of the historian, philosopher, and poet. Accustomed as we are to think of the vast steppes of Russia and Siberia as alike strange and boundless, and to deal with the unkown interior of Africa as an impenetrable mystery, we lose sight of a locality in our own country that once surpassed all these in virgin grandeur, in majestic solitude, and in all the attributes of a tremendous wilderness. The story of the Old Santa Fe Trail, so truthfully recalled by Colonel Henry Inman, ex-officer of the old Regular Army, in these pages, is a most thrilling one. The vast area through which the famous highway ran is still imperfectly known to most people as "The West"; a designation once appropriate, but hardly applicable now; for in these days of easy communication the real trail region is not so far removed from New York as Buffalo was seventy years ago. At the commencement of the "commerce of the prairies," in the early portion of the century, the Old Trail was the arena of almost constant sanguinary struggles between the wily nomads of the desert and the Page 1 Santa Fe Trail hardy white pioneers, whose eventful lives made the civilization of the vast interior region of our continent possible.
    [Show full text]
  • A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy Annie Thornburg Oakes The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Oakes, Annie Thornburg, "A Treatise on the Assault on Language Sovereignty in the United States: History, Education, and Implications for Policy" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4407. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4407 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A TREATISE ON THE ASSAULT ON LANGUAGE SOVEREIGNTY IN THE UNITED STATES: HISTORY, EDUCATION, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY By ANNIE THORNBURG OAKES Bachelor‟s Degrees, University of Utah, 1973, and Eastern Washington University, 2006 Master‟s Degree, Eastern Washington University, 1996 DISSERTATION presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage Studies The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of the Graduate School Graduate School S. Neyooxet Greymorning, Chair Anthropology Gregory Campbell Anthropology Richmond Clow Native American Studies Leora Bar-El Anthropology Irene Appelbaum Anthropology University of Montana Dissertation 2 COPYRIGHT by Annie T.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter Xxvi:2
    THE SOCIETY FOR THE STUDY OF THE INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES OF THE AMERICAS NEWSLETTER XXVI:2 July-September 2007 Published quarterly by the Society for the Study of the Indigenous Lan- SSILA BUSINESS guages of the Americas, Inc. Editor: Victor Golla, Dept. of Anthropology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521 (e-mail: golla@ ssila.org; web: www.ssila.org). ISSN 1046-4476. Copyright © 2007, The Chicago Meeting SSILA. Printed by Bug Press, Arcata, CA. The 2007-08 annual winter meeting of SSILA will be held on January 3-6, 2008 at the Palmer House (Hilton), Chicago, jointly with the 82nd Volume 26, Number 2 annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Also meeting concur- rently with the LSA will be the American Dialect Society, the American Name Society, and the North American Association for the History of the CONTENTS Language Sciences. The Palmer House has reserved blocks of rooms for those attending the SSILA Business . 1 2008 meeting. All guest rooms offer high speed internet, coffee makers, Correspondence . 3 hairdryers, CD players, and personalized in-room listening (suitable for Obituaries . 4 iPods). The charge for (wired) in-room high-speed internet access is $9.95 News and Announcements . 9 per 24 hours; there are no wireless connections in any of the sleeping Media Watch . 11 rooms. (The lobby and coffee shop are wireless areas; internet access costs News from Regional Groups . 12 $5.95 per hour.) The special LSA room rate (for one or two double beds) Recent Publications . 15 is $104. The Hilton reservation telephone numbers are 312-726-7500 and 1-800-HILTONS.
    [Show full text]
  • Revitalizing Indigenous Languages
    Revitalizing Indigenous Languages edited by Jon Reyhner Gina Cantoni Robert N. St. Clair Evangeline Parsons Yazzie Flagstaff, Arizona 1999 Revitalizing Indigenous Languages is a compilation of papers presented at the Fifth Annual Stabilizing Indigenous Languages Symposium on May 15 and 16, 1998, at the Galt House East in Louisville, Kentucky. Symposium Advisory Board Robert N. St. Clair, Co-chair Evangeline Parsons Yazzie, Co-chair Gina Cantoni Barbara Burnaby Jon Reyhner Symposium Staff Tyra R. Beasley Sarah Becker Yesenia Blackwood Trish Burns Emil Dobrescu Peter Matallana Rosemarie Maum Jack Ramey Tina Rose Mike Sorendo Nancy Stone B. Joanne Webb Copyright © 1999 by Northern Arizona University ISBN 0-9670554-0-7 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 99-70356 Second Printing, 2005 Additional copies can be obtained from College of Education, Northern Ari- zona University, Box 5774, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5774. Phone 520 523 5342. Reprinting and copying on a nonprofit basis is hereby allowed with proper identification of the source except for Richard Littlebear’s poem on page iv, which can only be reproduced with his permission. Publication information can be found at http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~jar/TIL.html ii Contents Repatriated Bones, Unrepatriated Spirits iv Richard Littlebear Introduction: Some Basics of Language Revitalization v Jon Reyhner Obstacles and Opportunities for Language Revitalization 1. Some Rare and Radical Ideas for Keeping Indigenous Languages Alive 1 Richard Littlebear 2. Running the Gauntlet of an Indigenous Language Program 6 Steve Greymorning Language Revitalization Efforts and Approaches 3. Sm’algyax Language Renewal: Prospects and Options 17 Daniel S. Rubin 4. Reversing Language Shift: Can Kwak’wala Be Revived 33 Stan J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Into Indian Country
    lessons for philanthropy: a journey into indian country 1 indian country Inupiaq St. Lawrence Island Yupik Gwich’in Holikachuk Koyukon Deg Xinag Upper Tanana Hän Kuskokwim Yup’ik Tanacross Dena’ina Ahtna Upper Tanana U n a n g a n Eyak a q p i u g / S i i q T l i n g i t A l u t Haida Jamestown S’Klallam Muckleshoot Port Gamble S’Klallam Tulalip Nooksack Lower Elwha Klallam Samish Lummi Puyallup Upper Skagit Colville Confederated Tribes Kalispel Tribe Makah Swinomish Quileute Sauk Suiattle Hoh Stillaguamish Kootenai Quinault Skokomish WA Snoqualmie Blackfeet Rocky Boy’s Squaxin LUMMI MAKAH SuquamishNOOKSACK San Spokane Tribe Juan Wha LOWER tcom Shoalwater Bay ELWHA SAMISH KLALLAM Okan NisquallyClalla UPPER SKAG ogan m SWIN QUILEUT Isl OMISH and IT E JAMEST Ferry Confederated St Chehalis OWN Skag evens KLALLAM it Flathead HOH Pend Fort Belknap Je ST SAUK-SUIATTLE O fferson Cowlitz TULALIPILLAGUAMISH reille Fort Peck PORT GAMB QUINAULT S’KL LETribes of the Coeur d’Alene A Grand Ronde M LLAM CO LVILLE ason C Kitsap SUQUAMIS Snoh Che ONFEDERATED KALISPEL SKOKOMIS omish lan H SNOQUALMIE H TRIBES TRIBE G Yakama Nation Siletz rays Kin H g arbor SQUAXIN D MUCKLESHO ouglas SHOALWAT Nez Perce CHE PUY SPO ER HALIS ALLUP OT KANE MT NISQUALLY T BAY Thu RIBE rston L incoln P acific Kitt Pierce itas Gran t Spo WarmWah SpringsLewis Yakima kane kiakum Umatilla Adam C s COWLIT owlitz Z W CON hitman FEDERATED Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw TRIBES OF T YAKAMA NATIONHE Fr North Cheyenne Cow Creek Band anklin CClalark Crow rk Ska Gar mania field Co lumbia Kl
    [Show full text]
  • 68 the Sutaio Dialect of Cheyenne: a Discussion of the Evidence Ives Goddard Smithsonian Institution
    68 The Sutaio dialect of Cheyenne: A Discussion of the Evidence Ives Goddard Smithsonian Institution The Sutaio1 became incorporated into the Cheyenne tribe in the protohistoric period. By tradition they were encountered by the Cheyenne somewhere on the Plains, and just as a fight was breaking out the two groups recognized that they spoke the same language and agreed not to fight, but to join together. Just exactly what the Sutaio spoke and how different it was from Cheyenne has been a mystery ever since. This paper reviews the few scraps of infor­ mation that exist on Sutaio and the problem of to what extent elements of Sutaio origin may have been incorporated into the Cheyenne language as we know it today. It appears that the only data obtained from Cheyennes who claimed to have learned some Sutaio from Sutaio speakers at a time when older Sutaio still spoke the language are in notes of George Bird Grinnell and Truman Michelson collected in the early years of this century. Grinnell's data are in a letter to William Jones of April 21, 1905 (Grinnell 1905). A note indicates that he obtained his information among the Southern Cheyenne in 1901. This seems to be the best Sutaio on record and the most likely, of what is available, to represent genuine examples of what the Sutaio spoke. The forms and phrases given are clearly volunteered, rather than elicited. Since it is most likely that they were remembered because of their divergence from the corresponding Cheyenne expressions, they probably present an exaggerated picture of the degree of difference between the two forms of speech.
    [Show full text]
  • AMP Proceedings Vogel Revised
    A Unified Account of Two Vowel Devoicing Phenomena: the Case of Cheyenne Rachel Vogel* Cornell University 1 Introduction Vowel devoicing has been the subject of typological investigation as far back as Greenberg 1969, and more recently in Gordon 1998 and Chitoran and Marsico 2010. This work has demonstrated that both phonetic and phonological processes of vowel devoicing across the world’s languages typically fit into one of the following two categories in terms of the environments in which they occur: a) adjacent to voiceless consonants, and b) adjacent to the right edge of a prosodic domain. It is also possible for one process to fit into both categories at the same time, as is the case in Brazilian Portuguese, in which word-final devoicing occurs only in vowels that are both adjacent to the right edge of a word and to a voiceless consonant (Walker and Mendes 2019). Aside from some domain-final cases, however, vowel devoicing adjacent to voiceless consonants is typically a domain-span process, targeting any vowel in the right segmental environment (with limited exceptions noted in Section 2 of this paper). This paper investigates two vowel devoicing processes in Cheyenne, an Algonquian language spoken in Montana and Oklahoma (Leman 2011). The first process, phrase-final devoicing (PFD), occurs in any word- final vowel at the end of what has been described as the phonological phrase (e.g., [návóómo méʃe̥ ] ‘I see the woodtick,’ Leman and Rhodes 1978). It is thus consistent with typological expectations and, as will be discussed in this paper, phonetically grounded. The second process, referred to as penultimate devoicing (PD) in the Cheyenne literature, occurs before voiceless consonants, but only in the penultimate syllable of some words (e.g., in [vóhpomaʔo̥ htse] ‘salt’ but not [mo̥ hoʔohtse] ‘part of Ursa Major,’ Fisher et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Sign Language Among North American Indians, by Garrick Mallery
    Sign Language among North American Indians, by Garrick Mallery. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/17451/17451-h/17451-h.htm [pg 265]266]267]268]269]270]271]272]273]274]275]276]277]278]279]280]281]282]283]284]285]286]287]288]289]290]291]292]293]294]295]296]297]298]299]300]301]302]303]304]305]306]307]308]309]310]311]312]313]314]315]316]317]318]319]320]321]322]323]324]325]326]327]328]329]330]331]332]333]334]335]336]337]338]339]340]341]342]343]344]345]346]347]348]349]350]351]352]353]354]355]356]357]358]359]360]361]362]363]364]365]366]367]368]369]370]371]372]373]374]375]376]377]378]379]380]381]382]383]384]385]386]387]388]389]390]391]392]393]394]395]396]397]398]399]400]401]402]403]404]405]406]407]408]409]410]411]412]413]414]415]416]417]418]419]420]421]422]423]424]425]426]427]428]429]430]431]432]433]434]435]436]437]438]439]440]441]442]443]444]445]446]447]448]449]450]451]452]453]454]455]456]457]458]459]460]461]462]463]464]465]466]467]468]469]470]471]472]473]474]475]476]477]478]479]480]481]482]483]484]485]486]487]488]489]490]491]492]493]494]495]496]497]498]499]500]501]502]503]504]505]506]507]508]509]510]511]512]513]514]515]516]517]518]519]520]521]522]523]524]525]526]527]528]529]530]531]532]533]534]535]536]537]538]539]540]541]542]543]544]545]546]547]548]549]550]551]552] The Project Gutenberg EBook of Sign Language Among North American Indians Compared With That Among Other Peoples And Deaf-Mutes, by Garrick Mallery This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Cheyenne Obviation and Pluralization Wayne Leman SIL-UND
    Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session Volume 21 Article 5 1977 Remarks on Cheyenne obviation and pluralization Wayne Leman SIL-UND Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers Recommended Citation Leman, Wayne (1977) "Remarks on Cheyenne obviation and pluralization," Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session: Vol. 21 , Article 5. DOI: 10.31356/silwp.vol21.05 Available at: https://commons.und.edu/sil-work-papers/vol21/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remarks on Cheyenne Obviation and Pluralization Wayne Leman In Cheyenne,! as in other Algonquian languages, when two or more third­ person nominals are in the same sentence or "contextual span" (Wolfart 1973:17), one of the nominals must be treated as "nearer" or more "in focus" than the other third-person nominal(sJ. The nearer person is called the "proximate" form while any other(s) is said to be "obviate" (sometimes called a "fourth-person"). The proximate nominal can function as the "topic" of a discourse segment, or "the person earlier spoken of and already known" (Rloomfield 1962:38). The marking of one or more nominals as obviatives is called "obviation". We can see some of the discourse-related functions of obviation in the following beginning lines from a Cheyenne story about a ground squirrel and a turtle.2 mehne-vohkaho?heso3 naa ma?eno3 e-sta-eve-amehnehoono33• ground squirrel3 and turitle3 they33 were walking along A ground squirrel and a turtle were walking along.
    [Show full text]