DOCSLIB.ORG

Sketch of Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sketch of Dissertation UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO Committing to the Party: The Costs of Governance in East Asian Democracies A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and International Affairs by Kuniaki Nemoto Committee in charge: Professor Ellis Krauss, Chair Professor Stephan Haggard, Co-Chair Professor Megumi Naoi Professor Matthew Shugart Professor Carlos Waisman 2009 Copyright Kuniaki Nemoto, 2009 All rights reserved SIGNATURE PAGE The Dissertation of Kuniaki Nemoto is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: Co-Chair Chair University of California, San Diego 2009 iii DEDICATION To Nemoto Norikuni and Nemoto Tokiko iv TABLE OF CONTENTS SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................... xii VITA .............................................................................................................................................. xv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................. xvi Chapter 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Definitional Issues ............................................................................................................ 10 1.3. Japan and Korea ................................................................................................................ 14 1.4. Plan of the Dissertation .................................................................................................. 25 Chapter 2. Committing to the Party: A Model of Party Discipline ...................................... 29 2.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 29 2.2. Leaders, Backbenchers, and Their Interactions ............................................................ 32 2.3. Implications and How to Test Them ............................................................................. 52 2.4. Conclusion ......................................................................................................................... 60 Chapter 3. Quest for Power: Party (Un)development in Japan and South Korea .............. 63 3.1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 63 3.2. Parties without Organization .......................................................................................... 69 3.3. Personalistic Electoral Competition ............................................................................... 80 v 3.4. Ideological Diversity ......................................................................................................... 98 3.5. Factional Struggles and Quest for Power .................................................................... 124 3.6. Quest for Power .............................................................................................................. 135 3.7. Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 151 Chapter 4. Party Discipline and Policy Dissension in Japan ................................................ 153 4.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 153 4.2. Theory .............................................................................................................................. 155 4.3. The Japanese Context .................................................................................................... 165 4.4. Data and Analysis ........................................................................................................... 174 4.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 197 Chapter 5. Party Discipline and Policy Dissension in Korea ............................................... 199 5.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 199 5.2. The Three Different Incentives .................................................................................... 202 5.3. Korean Context ............................................................................................................... 204 5.4. Empirical Analysis .......................................................................................................... 211 5.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 235 Chapter 6. Factional Politics and Budget Items in Japan ..................................................... 238 6.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 238 6.2. Evolution of Party Rules in the LDP .......................................................................... 240 6.3. Budget Making Process in Japan .................................................................................. 244 6.4. Hypotheses and Data ..................................................................................................... 250 6.5. Analysis and Discussion................................................................................................. 262 6.6. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 266 vi Chapter 7. Distribution of Subsidies and Party Discipline in Korea ................................. 268 7.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 268 7.2. Presidential Factor in Distributive Game .................................................................... 271 7.3. Korean Context ............................................................................................................... 279 7.4. Data Analysis ................................................................................................................... 289 7.5. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 303 Chapter 8. Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 312 8.1. Summarizing the Findings ............................................................................................. 312 8.2. Research Ahead ............................................................................................................... 317 References ................................................................................................................................... 328 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1: The LDP's Membership-to-Electorate (M/E) Ratio .......................................... 73 Figure 3.2: Japanese Parties' Fee-Paying Membership-to-Electorate (fpM/E) Ratios ....... 75 Figure 3.3: Korean Parties' Membership-to-Electorate (M/E) and Fee-Paying Membership-to-Electorate (fpM/E) Ratios .................................................................... 77 Figure 3.4: Answers to the question, "In deciding to cast a vote in this election, did you consider the party as more important, or the individual candidate as more important?" .......................................................................................................................... 93 Figure 3.5: Answers to the question, "In deciding to cast a vote in this election, which was the most important factor for you?" ......................................................................... 94 Figure 3.6: Independent Candidates in Japan .......................................................................... 97 Figure 3.7: Independent Candidates in South Korea .............................................................. 98 Figure 3.8: Ideological Positions of Japanese Diet Members, Kernel Density ................. 104 Figure 3.9: Ideological Positions of Korean National Assembly Members, Kernel Density ............................................................................................................................................. 107 Figure 3.10: Ideological Positions of Korean National Assembly Members, D-NOMINATE ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sunshine in Korea
    CENTER FOR ASIA PACIFIC POLICY International Programs at RAND CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND Center for Asia Pacific Policy View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. Sunshine in Korea The South Korean Debate over Policies Toward North Korea Norman D.
    [Show full text]
  • 15.8.2014 15,894 Brand Name (In Chinese) 品牌名稱(中文) Product
    Generation Date: 15.8.2014 List of Small Volume Exemption Products 已獲小量豁免產品名單 Total Number of SVE products: 15,894 (已獲小量豁免產品總數): Brand Name (in Product Name (in Chinese) Brand Name (in English) Product Name (in English) Exemption End Date Effective Date for Exemption No. Chinese) 產品名稱 (中文) 品牌名稱 (英文) 產品名稱 (英文) (豁免終止日期) Revocation of (豁免編號) 品牌名稱 (中文) Exemption (豁免撤銷生效日期) Nil Nil Nil Sanko Rice Roll with Seaweed 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007124 Nil Nil Nil Sanko Rice Cracker - Castard 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007123 Nil Nil Nil Wonderland Panda - Choco Ball 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007083 Nil Nil Nil Wonderland Candy - Animal Assort 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007082 Nil Nil Nil Asahi Ice Limone 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007081 Nil Nil Nil Asahi Ice Grapefruit 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007079 Nil Nil Nil MARUESU SNACK - WASABI SOY SAUCE TASTE 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007078 Nil Nil Nil MARUESU SNACK - HOKKAIDO CHEESE TASTE 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007072 Nil Nil Nil KASUGAI BEACH SODA CANDY 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007071 Nil Nil Nil Nissin Corn Flakes 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007070 Nil Nil Nil MARUESU SNACK - MAYONNAISE TASTE 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007069 Nil Nil Nil KASUGAI UME AME 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007068 Nil Nil Nil Bonchi Wheat Snack - Seaweed 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007067 Nil Nil Nil Bonchi Wheat Snack - Spicy 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007066 Nil Nil Nil Kasugai Gummy Candy - Muscat Flavor 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007065 Nil Nil Nil Kasugai Gummy Candy - Grape Flavor 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007064 Nil Nil Nil Kasugai Gummy Candy - Peach Flavor 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007063 Nil Nil Nil Bonchi Rice Snack 2015/07/31 N/A 14-007062 Nil Nil Nil Nissin
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Movement in the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
    Building A Movement In The Non-Profit Industrial Complex Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michelle Oyakawa Graduate Program in Sociology The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Korie Edwards, Advisor Andrew Martin Steve Lopez Copyrighted by Michelle Mariko Oyakawa 2017 Abstract Today, democracy in the United States is facing a major challenge: Wealthy elites have immense power to influence election outcomes and policy decisions, while the political participation of low-income people and racial minorities remains relatively low. In this context, non-profit social movement organizations are one of the key vehicles through which ordinary people can exercise influence in our political system and pressure elite decision-makers to take action on matters of concern to ordinary citizens. A crucial fact about social movement organizations is that they often receive significant financial support from elites through philanthropic foundations. However, there is no research that details exactly how non-profit social movement organizations gain resources from elites or that analyzes how relationships with elite donors impact grassroots organizations’ efforts to mobilize people to fight for racial and economic justice. My dissertation aims to fill that gap. It is an ethnographic case study of a multiracial statewide organization called the Ohio Organizing Collaborative (OOC) that coordinates progressive social movement organizations in Ohio. Member organizations work on a variety of issues, including ending mass incarceration, environmental justice, improving access to early childhood education, and raising the minimum wage. In 2016, the OOC registered over 155,000 people to vote in Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Politics in South Korea
    South Korea: Aurel Croissant Electoral Politics in South Korea Aurel Croissant Introduction In December 1997, South Korean democracy faced the fifteenth presidential elections since the Republic of Korea became independent in August 1948. For the first time in almost 50 years, elections led to a take-over of power by the opposition. Simultaneously, the election marked the tenth anniversary of Korean democracy, which successfully passed its first ‘turnover test’ (Huntington, 1991) when elected President Kim Dae-jung was inaugurated on 25 February 1998. For South Korea, which had had six constitutions in only five decades and in which no president had left office peacefully before democratization took place in 1987, the last 15 years have marked a period of unprecedented democratic continuity and political stability. Because of this, some observers already call South Korea ‘the most powerful democracy in East Asia after Japan’ (Diamond and Shin, 2000: 1). The victory of the opposition over the party in power and, above all, the turnover of the presidency in 1998 seem to indicate that Korean democracy is on the road to full consolidation (Diamond and Shin, 2000: 3). This chapter will focus on the role elections and the electoral system have played in the political development of South Korea since independence, and especially after democratization in 1987-88. Five questions structure the analysis: 1. How has the electoral system developed in South Korea since independence in 1948? 2. What functions have elections and electoral systems had in South Korea during the last five decades? 3. What have been the patterns of electoral politics and electoral reform in South Korea? 4.
    [Show full text]
  • CES Virtual 27Th International Conference of Europeanists Europe's Past, Present, and Future: Utopias and Dystopias All Sessio
    CES Virtual 27th International Conference of Europeanists Europe’s Past, Present, and Future: Utopias and Dystopias All sessions are listed in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). This Revised Preliminary Program is subject to change. We have tried to accommodate all of the submitted rescheduling requests. The Final Conference Program will be available on May 25, 2021. Please contact [email protected] about program-related updates by May 7, 2021. April 27, 2021 Pre-Conference and Conference Side Events MONDAY, JUNE 14 Territorial Politics and Federalism Research Network Business Meeting 6/14/2021 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM Business Meeting Chair: Willem Maas - York University TUESDAY, JUNE 15 Crises of Democracy 6/15/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 PM Keynote Sponsored by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Chair: Nicole Shea – Director, Council for European Studies Speakers: Eileen Gillooly - Executive Director, Heyman Center for the Humanities, Columbia University Jane Ohlmeyer - Professor of History at Trinity College and Chair of the Irish Research Council European Integration and Political Economy Research Network Speed Mentoring Event 6/15/2021 10:30 AM to 2:30 PM Networking Event Chair: Dermot Hodson - Birkbeck, University of London WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16 How to Pitch to Publishers 6/16/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 PM Speakers: Andrew Kinney - General Editor, Harvard University Press Jaya Aninda Chatterjee - Editor for World History, Geopolitics, and International Relations, Yale University Press 2 Mary Al-Sayed - Editor for Anthropology and History (World history;
    [Show full text]
  • Elections During Crisis: Global Lessons from the Asia-Pacific
    Governing During Crises Policy Brief No. 10 Elections During Crisis Global Lessons from the Asia-Pacific 17 March 2021 | Tom Gerald Daly Produced in collaboration with Election Watch and Policy Brief | Election Lessons from the Asia-Pacific Page 1 of 13 Summary _ Key Points This Policy Brief makes the following key points: (a) During 2020 states the world over learned just how challenging it can be to organise full, free, and fair elections in the middle of a pandemic. For many states facing important elections during 2021 (e.g. Japan, the UK, Israel) these challenges remain a pressing concern. (b) The pandemic has spurred electoral innovations and reform worldwide. While reforms in some states garner global attention – such as attempts at wholesale reforms in the US (e.g. early voting) – greater attention should be paid to the Asia-Pacific as a region. (c) A range of positive lessons can be drawn from the conduct of elections in South Korea, New Zealand, Mongolia, and Australia concerning safety measures, effective communication, use of digital technology, advance voting, and postal voting. Innovations across the Asia-Pacific region provide lessons for the world, not only on effectively running elections during a public health emergency, but also pointing to the future of election campaigns, in which early and remote voting becomes more common and online campaigning becomes more central. (d) Experiences elsewhere raise issues to watch out for in forthcoming elections in states and territories undergoing serious ‘pandemic backsliding’ in the protection of political freedoms. Analysis of Singapore and Indonesia indicates a rise in censorship under the pretext of addressing misinformation concerning COVID-19, and (in Indonesia) concerns about ‘vote- buying’ through crisis relief funds.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-South Korea Relations
    U.S.-South Korea Relations Mark E. Manyin, Coordinator Specialist in Asian Affairs Emma Chanlett-Avery Specialist in Asian Affairs Mary Beth D. Nikitin Specialist in Nonproliferation Brock R. Williams Analyst in International Trade and Finance Jonathan R. Corrado Research Associate May 23, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41481 U.S.-South Korea Relations Summary Overview South Korea (officially the Republic of Korea, or ROK) is one of the United States’ most important strategic and economic partners in Asia. Congressional interest in South Korea is driven by both security and trade interests. Since the early 1950s, the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty commits the United States to help South Korea defend itself. Approximately 28,500 U.S. troops are based in the ROK, which is included under the U.S. “nuclear umbrella.” Washington and Seoul cooperate in addressing the challenges posed by North Korea. The two countries’ economies are joined by the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA). South Korea is the United States’ seventh-largest trading partner and the United States is South Korea’s second- largest trading partner. Between 2009 and the end of 2016, relations between the two countries arguably reached their most robust state in decades. Political changes in both countries in 2017, however, have generated uncertainty about the state of the relationship. Coordination of North Korea Policy Dealing with North Korea is the dominant strategic concern of the relationship. The Trump Administration appears to have raised North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs to a top U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Business Cycle in Asian Countries
    Journal of Business and Economics, ISSN 2155-7950, USA October 2019, Volume 10, No. 10, pp. 966-980 DOI: 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/10.10.2019/005 Academic Star Publishing Company, 2019 http://www.academicstar.us The Political Business Cycle in Asian Countries Ling-Chun Hung (Department of Political Science, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan (R.O.C.)) Abstract: The political business cycle (PBC) theory argues that an incumbent party tends to use government resources to impress voters, so government spending always rises before but declines after an election. Many PBC studies have been done for an individual country or cross-countries, but the results are conflicting. The purpose of this paper is to explore possible fluctuating patterns of government spending in response to political elections in Asian countries because of a lack of studies across this region. In this study, data on 219 elections in 26 countries from 1990 to 2014 are collected. There are two main findings: firstly, government spending falls the year after elections in Asian countries; secondly, the degree of democracy and transparency have impacts on government spending in Asian countries. Key words: political business cycle; election cycle; government spending; government expenditure; Asian JEL code: H51 1. Introduction The political business cycle (PBC) theory has been addressed for four decades. The theory states that an incumbent party will use government resources to impress voters, so economic performance is good before but is poor after an election. However, empirically, scholars have not reach a consensus. Many PBC studies have been done for an individual country or cross-countries, but the results have not been consistent.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluctuating Anti-Americanism and the Korea-U.S. Alliance
    International Studies Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (October 2004): 23-40 23 Fluctuating Anti-Americanism and the Korea-U.S. Alliance • tt NAE-YOUNG LEE AND HAN WOOL JEONG Rising anti-Americanism in the winter of 2002 despite the increasing security threats from North Korea, has led some to call the situation a crisis in the ROK-U.S. alliance. However, the opinion polls from June 2003 and February 2004 show that anti-Americanism in South Korea has substantially waned The main aim of this paper is to examine whether the recent wave of anti-Americanism has the content and intensity to threaten the legitimacy of the ROK-U.S. alliance. By analyzing the changes in public attitude and perception towards the U.S. over the past two years based on three survey data, this paper argues that anti-Americanism in South Korea has not posed any real threat to the alliance. However, the polarized public opinion towards the U.S. remains a potentially serious threat to the future of the ROK-U.S. alliance. Keywords: Anti-Americanism, Korea-U.S. alliance, survey, public opinion, U.S.-Korea relations, North Korea • Nae-Young Lee, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Korea University, 5-1 Anam-dong, Sungbuk-gu, 136-701, Korea; Tel: 82-2-3290-2193; E-mail: [email protected] •• Gmesponding author. Direct all correspondence to Han Wool Jeong, Executive Director, East Asia Institute, #9(13 Sampoong B/D, 310-68, Euljiro 4-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, 100-849, Korea; Tel: 82-2-2277-1683; E-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from Brill.com09/30/2021 07:19:16PM via free access 24 Fluctuating Anti-AmericaniJm and the Korea-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Focus Briefing 01
    Korea Focus One election, two winners South Korea‘s parliamentary elections marked by success in the fight against the corona pandemic Eric J. Ballbach KDI School-FU Korea-Europe Programme Institute of Korean Studies Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Briefing No. 1 2020 Copyright to papers in this series remains with the authors or their assignees. Reproduction or reposting of texts in this paper can only be done with the permission of the respective author. The proper form for citing working papers in this series is: Name of author or editor. (Year). Title. Working paper, Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Korean Studies, Berlin. Briefing No. 01 Korea Focus One election, two winners South Korea‘s parliamentary elections marked by success in the fight against the corona pandemic Dr. Eric J. Ballbach* KDI School-FU Korea-Europe Programme Institute of Korean Studies Freie Univesität Berlin 2020 The parliamentary elections in South Korea on 15 April were the first nationwide democratic elections since the outbreak of the corona pandemic. The fact that these elections could be and were held at all is directly related to the strategy that the South Korean government is pursuing to contain the pandemic. The clear winner was the incumbent President Moon Jae-in, who was rewarded in particular for his successful crisis management. But the election is also a victory for the still comparatively young democracy in South Korea. Since the government and the population have learned from the experience of previous epidemics, citizens have not had to choose between exercising their democratic rights and protecting their health.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge American Politics Political Science 1974 Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party Peter H. Argersinger University of Maryland Baltimore County Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Argersinger, Peter H., "Populism and Politics: William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party" (1974). American Politics. 8. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_political_science_american_politics/8 POPULISM and POLITICS This page intentionally left blank Peter H. Argersinger POPULISM and POLITICS William Alfred Peffer and the People's Party The University Press of Kentucky ISBN: 978-0-8131-5108-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 73-86400 Copyright © 1974 by The University Press of Kentucky A statewide cooperative scholarly publishing agency serving Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky University, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky State College, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University- Editorial and Sales Offices: Lexington, Kentucky
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Growth 9 Inflation 9 Exchange Rates 9 External Sector 10 Forecast Summary 11 Quarterly Forecasts
    South Korea - Timeline 1 May 2018 A chronology of key events: 1945 - After World War II, Japanese occupation ends with Soviet troops occupying area north of the 38th parallel, and US troops in the south. 1948 - Republic of Korea proclaimed. The Korean war (1950-1953) killed at least 2.5 million people. It pitted the North - backed by Chinese forces - against the South, supported militarily by the United Nations In Depth: The Korean War On This Day 1950: UN condemns North Korean invasion 1950 - South declares independence, sparking North Korean invasion. 1953 - Armistice ends Korean War, which has cost two million lives. 1950s - South sustained by crucial US military, economic and political support. 1960 - President Syngman Ree steps down after student protests against electoral fraud. New constitution forms Second Republic, but political freedom remains limited. Coup 1961 - Military coup puts General Park Chung-hee in power. 1963 - General Park restores some political freedom and proclaims Third Republic. Major programme of industrial development begins. 1972 - Martial law. Park increases his powers with constitutional changes. After secret North-South talks, both sides seek to develop dialogue aimed at unification. 1979 - Park assassinated. General Chun Doo-hwan seizes power the following year. Gwangju massacre 133 Hundreds died as troops fired on 1980 rally 2005: Lingering legacy of Korean massacre 1980 - Martial law declared after student demonstrations. In the city of Gwangju army kills at least 200 people. Fifth republic and new constitution. 1981 - Chun indirectly elected to a seven year term. Martial law ends, but government continues to have strong powers to prevent dissent.
    [Show full text]