DOCSLIB.ORG

IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage IUCN Evaluation of Nominations of Natural and Mixed Properties to the World Heritage List Report to the Bureau of the World Heritage Committee Twenty-fourth session 26 June – 1 July 2000 - Paris, France Prepared by IUCN – The World Conservation Union 5 May 2000 Cover photograph: The Drakensberg Park / Alternatively known as oKhahlamba Park (South Africa) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................iii TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORTS........................................................................1 A. Nominations of natural properties to the World Heritage List................................. 1 A.1. New nominations ............................................................................................................... 1 Ischigualasto Provincial Park-Talampaya National Park (Argentina) ............................... 3 Noel Kempff Mercado National Park (Bolivia) ................................................................... 11 Jaú National Park (Brazil)................................................................................................... 13 The Pantanal Conservation Complex (Brazil) .................................................................... 21 Fernando de Noronha National Marine Park (Brazil) ....................................................... 29 Kopacki rit (Croatia)............................................................................................................. 35 National Park of Abruzzo (Italy).......................................................................................... 43 Kinabalu Park (Sabah, Malaysia)........................................................................................ 51 Gunung Mulu National Park (Sarawak, Malaysia)............................................................ 57 Lena River Delta (Russian Federation)............................................................................... 65 The Cape Floristic Region: Phase 1 (South Africa)............................................................ 67 Central Suriname Nature Reserve (Suriname) .................................................................. 75 A.2. Deferred nominations for which additional information has been received ....................................................................................................................................... 81 The High Coast (Sweden)..................................................................................................... 83 A.3. Extension of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List ............................ 85 Plitvice Lakes Extension (Croatia) ...................................................................................... 87 Caves of the Aggtelek Karst and Slovak Karst (Hungary / Slovakia) Extension to include Dobšinská Ice Cave (Slovakia)................................................................................ 93 A.4. Renomination of properties on the Heritage List to include additional criteria ......................................................................................................................................... 99 Ha Long Bay (Vietnam)...................................................................................................... 101 B. Nominations of mixed properties to the World Heritage List ............................... 107 B.1. New nominations ........................................................................................................... 107 Mt. Qingcheng and Dujiangyan Irrigation System (China)............................................. 109 Curonian Spit (Lithuania / Russian Federation) .............................................................. 117 Shey-Phoksudo National Park (Nepal).............................................................................. 119 The Drakensberg Park / Alternatively known as oKhahlamba Park (South Africa) ..... 121 B.2. Deferred nominations for which additional information has been received ..................................................................................................................................... 129 i The Greater Blue Mountains Area (Australia) ................................................................. 131 Isole Eolie (Aeolian Islands) (Italy).................................................................................... 145 COMMENTS ON CULTURAL NOMINATIONS........................................................157 C. Nominations of cultural properties to the World Heritage List ............................157 C.1. New nominations............................................................................................................157 Södra Ölands Odlingslandskap (The Agricultural Landscape of Southern Öland) (Sweden) .............................................................................................................................. 159 ii THE WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORTS 5 May 2000 1. INTRODUCTION This technical evaluation report of natural sites nominated for inclusion on the World Heritage List has been conducted by the Programme on Protected Areas (PPA) of IUCN – The World Conservation Union. PPA co-ordinates IUCN's input to the World Heritage Convention. It also co-ordinates activities of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) which is the world's leading expert network of protected area managers and specialists. In carrying out its function under the World Heritage Convention IUCN has been guided by four principles: (i) the need to ensure the highest standards of quality control and institutional memory in relation to technical evaluation, monitoring and other associated activities; (ii) the need to increase the use of specialist networks of IUCN, especially WCPA, but also other relevant IUCN Commissions and specialist networks; (iii) the need to work in support of the UNESCO World Heritage Centre and States Parties to examine how IUCN can creatively and effectively support the World Heritage Convention and individual sites as “flagships” for biodiversity conservation; and (iv) the need to increase the level of effective partnership between IUCN and the World Heritage Centre, ICOMOS and ICCROM. Members of the expert network of WCPA carry out the majority of technical evaluation missions. This has allows for the involvement of regional natural heritage experts and broadens the capacity of IUCN with regard to its work under the World Heritage Convention. Reports from field missions are comprehensively reviewed by a working session of the IUCN World Heritage Operational Panel at IUCN Headquarters held from 3-7 April, 2000. PPA then prepared the final technical evaluation reports which are outlined in this document. IUCN also has placed emphasis on providing input and support to ICOMOS in relation to cultural landscapes and other cultural nominations which have important natural values. IUCN recognises that nature and culture are strongly linked and that many natural World Heritage sites have important cultural values. The WCPA membership network now totals over 1300 protected area managers and specialists from 120 countries. This network has provided much of the basis for conducting the IUCN technical evaluations. In addition, the Protected Areas Programme has been able to call on experts from IUCN's other five Commissions (Environmental Law, Education and Communication, Ecosystem Management, and Environmental, Economic and Social Policy), from other specialist officers in the IUCN Secretariat, and from scientific contacts in universities and other international agencies. This highlights the considerable “added value” from investing in the use of the extensive networks of IUCN and partner institutions. 2. FORMAT World Heritage Bureau 2000 - Introduction iii Each technical evaluation report presents a concise summary of the nomination, a comparison with other similar sites, a review of management and integrity issues and concludes with the assessment of the applicability of the criteria, and a clear recommendation to the World Heritage Bureau. Standardised data sheets, prepared for each nomination by the World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC), are available in a separate document. 3. SITES REVIEWED At the time of writing, sixteen evaluation reports have been prepared by IUCN in 2000. These comprised: • Thirteen (13) natural sites nominations (including one renomination and two extensions to existing World Heritage sites); • Three (3) mixed sites (including one deferred site for which additional information has been received); and IUCN will provide a supplementary report to the June 2000 Bureau which will include the technical evaluation of one natural site, one mixed property and comments on one cultural landscape nomination. The field inspection of these sites took place in April and May, after the printing of this report. It has not been possible to review two (2) sites for presentation to the July Bureau meeting due to climatic reasons. In each case the delayed evaluation date was at the request of the State Party. These two (2) sites will be included in the full evaluation report to the 2000 November Bureau meeting The specific files reviewed by IUCN are as follows: A. Nominations of natural properties to the World Heritage List A.1 New nominations 966 Ischigualasto Provincial Park/Talampaya National Park Argentina
Load more

Recommended publications
  • World Heritage Nomination - Iucn Technical Evaluation
    WORLD HERITAGE NOMINATION - IUCN TECHNICAL EVALUATION PENINSULA VALDES (ARGENTINA) 1. DOCUMENTATION i) IUCN/WCMC Data Sheet (11 references). ii) Additional Literature Consulted: Davis, S. ed. 1997. Centres of Plant Diversity. Vol. 3. IUCN/WWF, pp 549-542; Kelleher, Bleakley & Wells. ed. 1995. A Global Representative System of Marine Protected Areas. Vol. 2. IUCN/ WB/GBRMPA, pp 76-83; Stattersfield, Crosby, et al. 1998. Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. Birdlife Conservation Series No. 7, pp 256-258; Reeves & Leatherwood. 1994. Dolphins, Porpoises and Whales – Action Plan for the Conservation of Cetaceans. IUCN/SSC Cetacean Specialist Group, pp 26-30; Bubas. 1996. Orcas de la Península Valdés. 13 p; Conway, R. & K. Payne. 1976. Patagonia: A wild shore where two worlds meet. National Geographic. 3/1976, pp 290-322; Erize. 1966. Sea Mammals of Patagonia. Animals. Vol. 8. No. 18, 4/1966, pp 479-481; CPPS/PNUMA. 1992. Plan de Acción para la Conservación de los Mamíferos Marinos en el Pacífico Sudeste. Informes y Estudios del Programa de Mares Regionales del PNUMA (UNEP), pp 110-155; Administración de Parques Nacionales de la Argentina. 1998. Las Areas Naturales Protegidas de la Argentina. APN/IUCN/FAO, 65 p; Leitch. 1990. South America's National Parks: A Visitor's Guide. The Mountaineers, pp 73-89. iii) Consultations: 5 external reviewers, National Parks Administration of Argentina, National Secretary for Tourism, National Commission of Co-operation with UNESCO, Patagonia Natural Foundation, Direction of Conservation and Tourism of the Chubut Province, EcoValdés Foundation, Superintendent of Península Valdés, National Centre for Patagonia, Association of Landowners of Península Valdés, Association of Artisan Fishermen, University of Patagonia, representative of Puerto Pirámides community, Whale watching tour operators, landowners iv) Field Visit: January 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Dossier
    THE LATIN AMERICA TRAVEL COMPANY TAILOR MADE ARGENTINA SELF DRIVE, MENDOZA TO SALTA ITINERARY ▶ CONTENTS, ABOUT US & TRIP SUMMARY CONTENTS OF THIS DOSSIER TRIP SUMMARY 2 ..... Contents, about us & trip summary DAY 1: Meet & greet at airport, private transfer to hotel 3 ….. Testimonials DAY 2: A city tour of the highlights of Buenos Aires 4 ..... Guide price and inclusions DAY 3: Fly to Mendoza, transfer to vineyard & asado dinner 5 ..... Detailed day by day itinerary DAY 4: A day of wine tasting at high end wineries & lunch 19 ... Recommended reading list DAY 5: Start driving north, stopping in Villa Unión 20 ... Booking conditions DAY 6: 4X4 excursion to the high Andean Puna DAY 7: Talampaya national park & a scenic drive to Belen ABOUT OUR COMPANY DAY 8: Drive to the wine town of Cafayate DAY 9: A day at leisure to visit wineries & enjoy the scenery As one of the UK’s leading, independent and family owned Latin DAY 10: Drive past the most stunning landscapes to Cachi America tour specialists our focus is on well thought through private and tailor made adventures. Our emphasis is very much on DAY 11: Continue past Los Cardones to Salta creating the right trip for you and we work closely with you in order DAY 12: A day at leisure or optional horse riding to achieve this. We use our experience and knowledge to ensure DAY 13: Return to Salta airport & fly back to Buenos Aires your trip to Latin America is a trip of a lifetime! DAY 14: Private transfer to the airport for departure ALL TOURS ARE FINANCIALLY PROTECTED SPEAK TO SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN TO ARGENTINA THE LATIN AMERICA TRAVEL COMPANY We are members of ABTA (Y1699) and our tours are ATOL protected ■ www.thelatinamericatravelcompany.com (license 10287) giving you full peace of mind when booking with us ■ [email protected] both for monies paid to us as well as the code of conduct and high ☎ standards that membership of these organisations require.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Information
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION The oldest known communal latrines provide evidence of gregarism in Triassic megaherbivores Lucas E. Fiorelli*, Martín D. Ezcurra, E. Martín Hechenleitner, Eloisa Argañaraz, Jeremías R. A. Taborda, M. Jimena Trotteyn, M. Belén von Baczko & Julia B. Desojo *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] 1. Provenance, authenticity, geological setting and stratigraphy of the communal latrines of the Chañares Formation 2. Depositional setting 3. Taphonomy 4. Statistics 5. Age of the Chañares Formation 6. Fossil tetrapods from the Chañares Formation 7. Dinodontosaurus body size 8. Dinodontosaurus as a gregarious megaherbivore 9. References 1. Provenance, authenticity, geological setting and stratigraphy of the communal latrines of the Chañares Formation. Several communal latrines were found in successive palaeontological field works conducted in 2011 and 2012 in outcrops of the Chañares Formation situated in the Talampaya National Park, La Rioja Province, northwestern Argentina (Supplementary Figure 1a). The Chañares Formation 1 crops out as part of the Ischigualasto-Villa Unión Basin, which represents a succession of continental deposits composed of 4,000 metres of alluvial, fluvial and lacustrine sediments 2,3 . The basin contains the reddish Talampaya and Tarjados formations as its lower- most units and corresponds to the Synrift 1 tectonic phase. The Talampaya Formation is dated as Induan/Olenekian (Early Triassic) and the Tarjados Formation as Anisian (early Middle Triassic) according to some authors 3,4 . The lower section of the Talampaya Formation is represented by alluvian fan deposits followed by fluvial and playa lake deposits in the middle and upper sections 4. The Tarjados Formation has aerealy extensive outcrops in the Talampaya National Park but at the moment no significant fossil vertebrate remains were reported.
    [Show full text]
  • The Precise Temporal Calibration of Dinosaur Origins SEE COMMENTARY
    The precise temporal calibration of dinosaur origins SEE COMMENTARY Claudia A. Marsicanoa, Randall B. Irmisb,c,1, Adriana C. Mancusod, Roland Mundile, and Farid Chemalef aDepartamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Instituto de Estudios Andinos-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires C1428EHA, Argentina; bNatural History Museum of Utah, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1214; cDepartment of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0102; dInstituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales, Centro Científico y Tecnológico-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas-Mendoza, Mendoza CC330, Argentina; eBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA 94709; and fInstituto de Geociências, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília-DF 70864-050, Brazil Edited by Paul E. Olsen, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, and approved November 6, 2015 (received for review June 25, 2015) Dinosaurs have been major components of ecosystems for over 200 composition across Pangea appears to be particularly heteroge- million years. Although different macroevolutionary scenarios exist neous (11–13). Without precise independent age control (other to explain the Triassic origin and subsequent rise to dominance of than vertebrate biostratigraphic correlations), it is impossible to dinosaurs and their closest relatives (dinosauromorphs), all lack critical determine if these faunal differences vary across time, space, or a support from a precise biostratigraphically independent temporal combination of both. framework. The absence of robust geochronologic age control for Among the many uncertainties regarding dinosaur evolution is comparing alternative scenarios makes it impossible to determine if the timing of the origin and subsequent radiation of this clade and observed faunal differences vary across time, space, or a combination their closest relatives (early dinosauromorphs).
    [Show full text]
  • Argentina Dario Podestá Dario
    100 reasons to visit ARGENTINA DARIO PODESTÁ DARIO An amazing variety of landscapes and habitats... an impressive diversity of birds. Red-tailed Comet Picaflor cometa | Sappho sparganura Argentina comprises an amazing diversity of landscapes and habitats: from subtropical rainforests in the north to dry steppes and deserts in the south N and west; and from the highest peaks of the western SE N E J hemisphere in the Andes range, to the flatlowlands of ER LL the Pampas and Chaco. And everything in between. O For this reason there is an impressive diversity of MÓN M RA birds, with over 1000 species. In this brochure you will find a selection of Argentina’s bird fauna, with species significant for their uniqueness, rarity, or endemic status. They represent some of the species most sought-after by birdwatchers who visit this part of the globe. Credits. Idea and text: Marcelo Gavensky and Francisco González Taboas (Aves Argentinas). Edition and graphic design: Mariano Masariche. Colaboration: Roberto Güller. Technical revision: Alejandro Di Giacomo. Fotos: Roberto Güller; Adrián Aspiroz; Francisco Erize; Andrés Terán; Ramón Moller Jensen; Alec Earnshaw; Alejandro Ronchetti; Fernando Bernasconi; Francisco Lucero; Carlos Cuñado; Carlos Cáceres; Alberto Gurni and Luis Piovani. Ruddy-headed Goose Cauquén colorado | Chloephaga rubidiceps CISCO ERIZE CISCO N FRA ARGENTINA Bolivia JUJUY North Argentina’s SALTA 1 4 1 - Laguna de los Pozuelos Natural Monument TUCUMÁN 3 JUJUY CATAMARCA 2 - Calilegua National Park Chile 2 tourism SANTIAGO DEL 3 - Baritú
    [Show full text]
  • Rock Art of Latin America & the Caribbean
    World Heritage Convention ROCK ART OF LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN Thematic study June 2006 49-51 rue de la Fédération – 75015 Paris Tel +33 (0)1 45 67 67 70 – Fax +33 (0)1 45 66 06 22 www.icomos.org – [email protected] THEMATIC STUDY OF ROCK ART: LATIN AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN ÉTUDE THÉMATIQUE DE L’ART RUPESTRE : AMÉRIQUE LATINE ET LES CARAÏBES Foreword Avant-propos ICOMOS Regional Thematic Studies on Études thématiques régionales de l’art Rock Art rupestre par l’ICOMOS ICOMOS is preparing a series of Regional L’ICOMOS prépare une série d’études Thematic Studies on Rock Art of which Latin thématiques régionales de l’art rupestre, dont America and the Caribbean is the first. These la première porte sur la région Amérique latine will amass data on regional characteristics in et Caraïbes. Ces études accumuleront des order to begin to link more strongly rock art données sur les caractéristiques régionales de images to social and economic circumstances, manière à préciser les liens qui existent entre and strong regional or local traits, particularly les images de l’art rupestre, les conditions religious or cultural traditions and beliefs. sociales et économiques et les caractéristiques régionales ou locales marquées, en particulier Rock art needs to be anchored as far as les croyances et les traditions religieuses et possible in a geo-cultural context. Its images culturelles. may be outstanding from an aesthetic point of view: more often their full significance is L’art rupestre doit être replacé autant que related to their links with the societies that possible dans son contexte géoculturel.
    [Show full text]
  • How Roads Affect the Spatial Use of the Guanaco In
    diversity Article How Roads Affect the Spatial Use of the Guanaco in a South American Protected Area: Human Connectivity vs Animal Welfare Flavio M. Cappa 1,2,* , Carlos E. Borghi 1,2 and Stella M. Giannoni 1,2,3 1 INTERBIODES (Interacciones Biológicas del Desierto), Facultad Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan J5400ARL, Argentina 2 CIGEOBIO, UNSJ-CONICET (Centro de Investigaciones de la Geósfera y Biósfera, Universidad Nacional de San Juan–Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), San Juan J5400ARL, Argentina 3 Instituto y Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Facultad Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de San Juan, San Juan J5400ARL, Argentina * Correspondence: fl[email protected]; Tel.: +54-264-4260353; Fax: +54-264-4234980 Received: 19 March 2019; Accepted: 2 July 2019; Published: 12 July 2019 Abstract: Roads can affect animals as well as their habits at different levels. Avoidance behavior is a common response of animals to this type of perturbation, preventing access to areas rich in resources. The effects of roads on ungulates have not been studied in South America extensively, especially in arid environments. We have studied the space use by ungulates in relation to roads, using a dung heap count and camera traps. The aim was to evaluate whether paved road and unpaved road may have an effect on the spatial use of a low density population of guanacos (Lama guanicoe) in Ischigualasto Provincial Park, Argentina. We observed an increase in dung heap abundance in unpaved road as respect to paved road, this difference was larger for both.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Symbol of the Andes: a Range Wide Conservation Priority Setting Exercise for the Andean Condor (Vultur Gryphus)
    Saving the Symbol of the Andes: A Range Wide Conservation Priority Setting Exercise for the Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) Robert Wallace, Ariel Reinaga, Natalia Piland, Renzo Piana, F. Hernán Vargas, Rosa Elena Zegarra, Pablo Alarcón, Sergio Alvarado, José Álvarez, Fernando Angulo, Vanesa Astore, Francisco Ciri, Jannet Cisneros, Celeste Cóndor, Víctor Escobar, Martín Funes, Jessica Gálvez-Durand, Carolina Gargiulo, Sandra Gordillo, Javier Heredia, Sebastián Kohn, Alejandro Kusch, Sergio Lambertucci, Diego Méndez, Rubén Morales, Alexander More, Adrián Naveda- Rodríguez, David Oehler, Oscar Ospina-Herrera, Andrés Ortega, José Antonio Otero, Fausto Sáenz-Jiménez, Carlos Silva, Claudia Silva, Rosa Vento, Guillermo Wiemeier, Galo Zapata-Ríos & Lorena Zurita May 2020 Results of Andean Condor Range Wide Priority Setting Workshop, May 6th-9th 2015, held in Lima, Peru. Author order is based on the following criteria. The first author led the design of the workshop and research, raised funding for the meeting, provided data and supervised the systematization of Andean condor data across the range, facilitated the RWPS portion of the workshop, and led write-up efforts. The second author systematized Andean condor data and produced maps and spatial analyses for the workshop and the publication. The third author produced a note record of the workshop and then wrote up significant portions of the document. The next three authors were fundamental in the organization and design of the workshop, provided data and reviewed and contributed to this document. The next 31 authors participated in the workshop, generously provided data, and reviewed and edited the report. 1 Saving the Symbol of the Andes: A Range Wide Conservation Priority Setting Exercise for the Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) Thomas Kramer4 5 Title: Saving the Symbol of the Andes: A Range Wide Conservation Priority Setting Exercise for the Andean Condor (Vultur gryphus) First edition: May 2020 Editor: Robert B.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of the Herpetofauna of Talampaya National Park, a World Heritage Site in Argentina
    Neotropical Biology and Conservation 13(3):202-211, september-december 2018 Unisinos - doi: Inventory of the herpetofauna of Talampaya National Park, a World Heritage Site in Argentina Inventário da herpetofauna do Parque Nacional Talampaya, Patrimônio da Humanidade, na Argentina Camila Kass1,2* [email protected] Abstract Talampaya National Park (TNP) was designated a UNESCO World Heritage Site, together Nicolas Ariel Kass2 [email protected] with Ischigualasto Provincial Park in 2000, but there is no list with updated information from reptiles and amphibians eighteen years after its creation. Therefore, we listed a complete Melina Alicia Velasco2 inventory of the herpetofauna of TNP with the information obtained from bibliography, data [email protected] from Argentina National Parks Administration (ranger reports and the species listed in their database) and fieldwork using pitfall traps, active search transects and pictures/material María Dolores Juri1 collected in the site. We confirm the occurrence of 35 species of herpetofauna in the TNP, [email protected] including 29 reptiles and 6 amphibians. Some species found in TNP are of great value because their national conservation status is vulnerable (Chelonoidis chilensis, Liolaemus 2 Jorge Daniel Williams anomalus, Liolaemus riojanus) or even endangered (Boa constrictor occidentalis). There- [email protected] fore, priority areas for conservation of these species should be proposed inside the park. 2 Federico Pablo Kacoliris Amphibians, conservation area, list of species, reptiles. [email protected] Keywords: Resumo O Parque Nacional Talampaya (TNP) foi declarado Patrimônio da Humanidade pela UNESCO, juntamente com o Parque Provincial Ischigualasto, em 2000, mas não há lista com informações atualizadas de répteis e anfíbios 18 anos após sua criação.
    [Show full text]
  • Buenos Aires
    www.argentina.travel Buenos Aires Córdoba Litoral Norte Cuyo Patagonia www.argentina.travel In Argentina, contrasting features undoubtedly abound. In this country, you are going to find different colors, weathers, feelings. You will find beautiful sceneries and live joyful times once and again, but there is one thing that keeps the same —the way locals are going to be friendly and warm, and will find that entertaining you is their pleasure. WORLD HERITAGES Quebrada de Humahuaca Cueva de las Manos, At the Upper Pinturas River Province of Jujuy Province of Santa Cruz The Quebrada de Humahuaca’s multicolored landscapes frame the villages Located South of the Perito Moreno town, by the Alto Río Pinturas Valley, of Purmamarca, Maimará, Tilcara and Humahuaca. Its adobe houses, the Cueva de las Manos (Cave of the Hands) contains one of the most historical chapels and Pre-Hispanic ruins provide a stunning view. A monolith significant assemblages of cave art in the Patagonia. Vestiges of a 9,300 marks the Tropic of Capricorn, where each June 21st, the celebration of the year-old culture are foundin the caves and the gully’s rocky sides, which show Inti Raymi (Sun Festival) takes place. stenciled outlines of human hands and other rich pre-historic depictions giving testimony to its past. World Cultural Landscape World Cultural Heritage Site Iguazú National Park Jesuit Block and Estancias of Córdoba Province of Misiones Province of Córdoba The famous Iguazú Falls, one of the most spectacular waterfalls in the world, This magnificent collection of historical buildings include the Church of the are at the heart of this National Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Ischigualasto-Talampaya Natural Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (Archived)
    IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Ischigualasto-Talampaya Natural Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) IUCN Conservation Outlook Assessment 2017 (archived) Finalised on 09 November 2017 Please note: this is an archived Conservation Outlook Assessment for Ischigualasto- Talampaya Natural Parks. To access the most up-to-date Conservation Outlook Assessment for this site, please visit https://www.worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org. Ischigualasto-Talampaya Natural Parks SITE INFORMATION Country: Argentina Inscribed in: 2000 Criteria: (viii) Site description: These two contiguous parks, extending over 275,300 ha in the desert region on the western border of the Sierra Pampeanas of central Argentina, contain the most complete continental fossil record known from the Triassic Period (245-208 million years ago). Six geological formations in the parks contain fossils of a wide range of ancestors of mammals, dinosaurs and plants revealing the evolution of vertebrates and the nature of palaeo-environments in the Triassic Period. © UNESCO IUCN World Heritage Outlook: https://worldheritageoutlook.iucn.org/ Ischigualasto-Talampaya Natural Parks - 2017 Conservation Outlook Assessment (archived) SUMMARY 2017 Conservation Outlook Good The two protected areas jointly forming the Ischigualasto-Talampaya Natural Parks World Heritage property cover some 275,000 hectares. The landscape and biodiversity have been subject to multiple use pressure before the establishment of protected areas, some of which have since been continuing illegally. Like many protected areas, the property is facing challenges from poaching, firewood harvesting, invasive and feral species, as well as road construction impacts against a backdrop of insufficient funding and staffing. It would thus be misleading to interpret the conclusion of this assessment as covering the overall status of the two contiguous protected areas.
    [Show full text]
  • CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT for ARGENTINA 2019 – 1 of 279 –
    Centralized National Risk Assessment for Argentina FSC-CNRA-AR V1-0 EN FSC-CNRA-AR V1-0 EN CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ARGENTINA 2019 – 1 of 279 – Title: Centralized National Risk Assessment for Argentina Document reference FSC-CNRA-AR V1-0 EN code: Approval body: FSC International Center: Performance and Standards Unit Date of approval: 16 April 2019 Contact for comments: FSC International Center - Performance and Standards Unit - Adenauerallee 134 53113 Bonn, Germany +49-(0)228-36766-0 +49-(0)228-36766-30 [email protected] © 2019 Forest Stewardship Council, A.C. All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the publisher’s copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means (graphic, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, recording taping, or information retrieval systems) without the written permission of the publisher. Printed copies of this document are for reference only. Please refer to the electronic copy on the FSC website (ic.fsc.org) to ensure you are referring to the latest version. The Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) is an independent, not for profit, non- government organization established to support environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial, and economically viable management of the world’s forests. FSC’s vision is that the world’s forests meet the social, ecological, and economic rights and needs of the present generation without compromising those of future generations. FSC-CNRA-AR V1-0 EN CENTRALIZED NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR ARGENTINA 2019 – 2 of 279 – Contents Risk assessments that have been finalized for Argentina .......................................... 4 Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for Argentina ..................................
    [Show full text]