DOCSLIB.ORG

The Republic of Kenya

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Republic of Kenya THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MoEST) KENYA GPE PRIMARY EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FINAL VULNERABLE AND MARGINALISED GROUPS FRAMEWORK (VMGF) JANUARY 2015 Prepared by: Tito Kodiaga Environment and Social Safeguards Specialist EMC Consultants Limited Cell: +254-722-579-272 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.emconsultants.org Page | 1 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ASAL Arid and Semi Arid Land BOM Boards of Management CEMASTEA Centre for Mathematics, Science and Technology Education in Africa COK Constitution of Kenya CPS Country Partnership Strategy CSO Civil Society Organizations DFID Department for International Development EGM Early Grade Mathematics EMIS Environmental Management Information System ESMF Environmental & Social Management Framework FPIC Free, prior, and informed consultation GOK Government of Kenya GPE Global Primary Education GRC Grievance Redress Committee GRM Grievances Redress Mechanism ILO International Labor Organization IPPF Indigenous Peoples Planning Framework KCPE Kenya Certificate of Primary Education KNCHR National Commission on Human Rights KNEC Kenya National Examination Council M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MOEST Ministry of Education, Science and Technology NESP National Education Sector Plan NGO Non-Governmental Organisations NLC National Land Commission PCU Project Coordination Unit PLO Project Liaison Officer PRIMR Primary Research Initiative in Mathematics & Reading RED Regional Environment Divisions SA Social Assessment SAP Social Assessment Process SDI Service Delivery Indicator SIP School Improvement Plan TAD Teacher Appraisal and Development TSC Teaching Service Commission UNDRIP UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples UNPFII UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Interests USAID United States Agency for International Development VMG Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups VMGF Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework VMGP Vulnerable and Marginalised Groups Plan Page | 2 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1.1 Reasons for the use of a Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework ............................ 6 1.2 Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.1 Component 1: Scaling Up Early Grade Mathematics .............................................................. 8 1.2.2 Component 2: Strengthened School Management ................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Component 3: Strengthening Data/EMIS System ................................................................. 10 1.2.4 Component 4: Project Management Functions ...................................................................... 11 1.3 Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups GPE Project Areas ............................................................. 11 1.4 Vulnerable & Marginalized Groups Requirements ........................................................................ 12 1.4.1 Screening, Preparation and Implementation of VMGPs ....................................................... 13 1.4.2 Consultation and Stakeholder Engagement ........................................................................... 14 1.4.3 Grievance Redress Mechanisms ............................................................................................. 14 1.4.4 Disclosure ............................................................................................................................... 15 1.4.5 Monitoring and Evaluation .................................................................................................... 15 1.4.6 Annual Reporting and Performance Review Requirements .................................................. 15 1.4.7 Budget ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 Project Description ....................................................................................................................... 17 2.1.1 Country and sector context/ Project Concept ......................................................................... 17 2.2 Sectoral and Institutional Context ................................................................................................ 17 2.2.1 Relationship to Country Partnership Strategy (CPS) ........................................................... 17 2.2.2 Proposed Development Objectives (PDOs) ............................................................................ 18 2.2.3 Objectives of the Project ......................................................................................................... 18 2.3 Global Project Education (GPE) .................................................................................................... 19 2.3.1 GPE Components: .................................................................................................................. 19 2.4 The Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups in Operational Areas .................................................. 23 2.5 Project Implementation Arrangements ......................................................................................... 24 3 METHODOLOGY AND CONSULTATION ................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Detailed and in-depth literature review ........................................................................................ 25 3.2 Interactive Discussions .................................................................................................................. 25 3.3 Preparation of VMGF ..................................................................................................................... 25 4 SOCIAL ASSESSMENT of THE VULNERABLE & MARGINALISED GROUPS in gPe Operational Areas ..... 26 4.1 Vulnerable and Marginalized Peoples in Kenya ............................................................................. 26 4.2 Brief Highlight of Vulnerable and Marginalized Peoples in Kenya ................................................. 27 4.3 No Specific Legislation on Vulnerable & Marginalized Groups in Kenya ...................................... 35 4.3.1 2010 Constitution of Kenya .................................................................................................... 35 4.3.2 Constitutional Implementation .............................................................................................. 36 Page | 3 GPE Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Framework - VMGF 5 Potential Positive and Negative Impacts of GpE on vulnerable & marginalIsed groups...................... 39 5.1 Potential Beneficial Impacts ........................................................................................................... 39 5.2 Potential Negative Impacts ............................................................................................................ 40 5.3 Proposed Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................................... 40 6 framework for ensuring free, prior, and informed consultation ......................................................... 42 6.1 Project Investment Screening ........................................................................................................ 42 6.1.1 Preparation of Social Screening Form .................................................................................... 43 6.2 Bank Decision on Project Investments .......................................................................................... 44 6.2.1 Who Conducts the SA ............................................................................................................ 45 7 THE VULNERABLE & marginaliSed GROUPS plan ................................................................................. 46 7.1.1 Elements of a Vulnerable and Marginalized Groups Plan ..................................................... 46 8 STRATEGY FOR PARTICIPATION & CONSULTATION WITH Vulnerable & marginalised groups ............ 50 9 GRIEVANCES REDRESS MECHANISM .................................................................................................... 53 9.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 53 9.2 Grievance Redress Process ........................................................................................................... 54 9.2.1 Establishment of Grievance Redress Committee .................................................................... 54 9.2.2 Use of Alternative Dispute Resettlement
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Veda Publishing House of the Slovak Academy of Sciences Slovak Academy of Sciences
    VEDA PUBLISHING HOUSE OF THE SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF LITERARY SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ORIENTAL STUDIES Editors JOZEF GENZOR VIKTOR KRUPA ASIAN AND AFRICAN STUDIES SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES BRATISLAVA INSTITUTE OF LITERARY SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF ORIENTAL STUDIES XXIV 1988 1989 VEDA, PUBLISHING HOUSE OF THE SLOVAK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES • BRATISLAVA CURZON PRESS • LONDON PUBLISHED OUTSIDE THE SOCIALIST COUNTRIES SOLELY BY CURZON PRESS LTD • LONDON ISBN 0 7007 0220 2 ISSN 0571 2742 © VEDA, VYDAVATEĽSTVO SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED, 1989 ISBN 80-224-0196-X (Series) ISBN 80-224-0065-3 (Vol. 24) CONTENTS A r tic le s K řupa, Viktor: Remarks on Creativity in Language ............................................................... 11 Rácová, Anna: Analogical Nomination in B en gali........................................................... 19 D r o z d ik , Ladislav: Word-Class Shifts of Multiword Units in the Lexicon of Modern Written A rabic ............................................................................................................................... 27 G á lik , Marián: Studies in Modern Chinese Intellectual History: V. Young Wang Guowei (1901—1911)................................................................................' ................................................ 37 G á lik , Marián: Interliterary Aspects o f the Short Stories by Lu Xun: Changming Deng (The Eternal Lamp) and V. M. Garshin: Krasnyi Tsvetok (The Red Flower) .... 67 Kut’ka, Karol: Some Reflections on Yukio Mishimas
    [Show full text]
  • The Causative in Rendille
    THE CAUSATIVE IN RENDILLE Günther Schlee Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere – Schriftenreihe des Kölner Instituts für Afrikanistik, No. 15 1988: 5–65 This is an electronic version of a paper I published in 1988. It is identical with the original text apart from technical changes. These comprise 1. The spelling of the Rendille examples has been adjusted to the conventions adopted later (e.g. Pillinger, Steve and Francis Letiwa Galboran, 1999, Rendille-English Dictionary, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe; Schlee, Günther and Karaba Sahado, 2002, Rendille Proverbs in their Social and Legal Context, Köln: Rüdiger Köppe). The consonant signs in the left column have been replaced by those in the right (in Rendille words only! In other languages other conventions have developed). c → ch d' → d d → 'd ħ → h h → 'h x → kh In some instances the ethnonym ‘Galla’, which I had taken over from my sources even though it was outdated even then, has been replaced by ‘Oromo’ which has evolved into the only accepted designation of that group. In 1988 I had been content with explaining in brackets that the group referred to by my sources as Galla are the Oromo. 2. Minor inconsistencies in diacritics on vowels have been left. I used to underline open vowels, but as the original text was type written (before the computer age!), underlining was also used as the type writer convention for italics. The distinction then became non- visible. It may not be phonemic anyhow. In the cases where underlining was visible in the original, I kept it. After h, a u becomes centralized (ü).
    [Show full text]
  • South Cushitic Links to East Cushitic
    South Cushitic links to East Cushitic Roland Kießling, Hamburg The aim of this paper is to review Hetzron's arguments (1980: 70-78) to include Southern Cushitic within Eastern Cushitic, i.e. his Lowland Cushitic subgroup1, on the basis of a growing corpus of Southern Cushitic morphological reconstructions and to discuss some more common candidates for diagnostic isomorphs. The term Southern Cushitic is restricted here to four closely related languages - Iraqw, Gorwaa, Alagwa and Burunge - which constitute the West Rift branch (Ehret 1980: 132) that has to be regarded as the core of Southern Cushitic and probably its only indisputable branch. Dahalo has too many Eastern Cushitic features to be regarded as Southern Cushitic (Tosco 1989, Tosco 1990, Tosco 1991: xii; Tosco/Blažek 1994), Ma'a / Mbugu has too many admixtures from Bantu and Eastern Cushitic sources (Mous 1994, 1996), and Qwadza and Asax are not at all sufficiently described and probably never will be. The internal subgrouping of the remaining WR2 languages according to Kießling (1998: 168) is as follows: Proto West Rift I. North West Rift Iraqwoid: Iraqw, Gorwaa Alagwoid: Alagwa II. South West Rift Burunge Hetzron (1980: 70ff.) mentions six isomorphs, four of which linking what he calls the "Iraqw cluster" to Cushitic in general, i.e. the gender markers, person marking verbal suffixes, "tense" suffixes, and verbal derivational suffixes; the remaining two relating it to his LC group in particular, i.e. redundant subject marking (subject selector system)3 and preverbal case marking. Rephrasing all of them here from an improved analytical point of view and on a sound comparative PWR basis, the general Cushitic features of PWR include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya Project 1973-80
    The Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya Project 1973-80 Bernd Heine Institut für Afrikanistik University of Cologne [email protected] 1. The Project Work on the language atlas of Kenya (Sprachen- und Dialektatlas Kenia ), directed by Bernd Heine and Wilhelm Möhlig of the Institut für Afrikanistik , University of Cologne, was carried out between 1973 and 1980. This work benefited from earlier field work that the author was able to conduct within the mapping project Afrika-Kartenwerk between 1969 and 1971 (Heine & Köhler 1981).1 Responsibility within the atlas project was divided up between the two directors, in that Wilhelm Möhlig was in charge of Bantu languages and Bernd Heine of non-Bantu languages; the present paper highlights most of all the latter part of the project. The project was carried out in cooperation with the Department of Linguistics and African Languages of the University of Nairobi, to which I wish to express my deeply-felt gratitude for all the support it gave to the project. 2 The objectives of the project were quite comprehensive, they included the following goals: (a) Document all languages and dialects spoken natively in Kenya; (b) Describe their geographical distribution; (c) Define the relationship among the languages. (d) Search for appropriate models to account for dialect continua; (e) Describe the sociolinguistic situation of Kenya; (f) Describe the knowledge and use of the two main second languages, Swahili and English, and their role in national communication; (g) Document all endangered languages. Research techniques were based on 1 I wish to express my gratitude to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Society), which sponsored both projects.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SOCIAL and BELIEF SYSTEM of the RENDILLE CAMEL NOMADS of NORTHERN KENYA [Günther Schlee]
    THE SOCIAL AND BELIEF SYSTEM OF THE RENDILLE CAMEL NOMADS OF NORTHERN KENYA [Günther Schlee] ENGLISH VERSION: HALLE 2014 (GERMAN ORIGINAL: BERLIN 1979) HALLE (SAALE) 2017 MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL ANTHROPOLOGY DEPartment ‘IntegraTION AND CONFLICt’ FIELD NOTES AND RESEARCH PROJECTS VII In the FIELD NOTES AND RESEARCH PROJECTS Series the following titles have been published so far: (I) Schlee, Günther (ed.): Pastoralism graphic Project in South Africa and in Interaction with other Forms of Swaziland: Vol. II: Photo Essays and Land Use in the Blue Nile Area of Court Cases, 2007–11 the Sudan: Project Outline and Field (VI) Finke, Peter, and Günther Schlee Notes 2009–10 (eds): CASCA – Centre for Anthropo- (II) Schlee, Isir, Beleysa Hambule, logical Studies on Central Asia: Fram- and Günther Schlee: The Moiety Di- ing the Research, Initial Projects vision and the Problem of Rendille (VII) Schlee, Günther: The Social and Unity: A Discussion among Elders, the Belief System of the Rendille – Korr, 21st January, 2008 Camel Nomads of Northern Kenya: (III) Awad Alkarim and Günther English Version: Halle 2014 (German Schlee (eds): Pastoralism in Interac- Original: Berlin 1979) tion with other Forms of Land Use (VIII) Schlee, Günther: Das Glau- in the Blue Nile Area of the Sudan bens- und Sozialsystem der Rendille – II: Herbarium and Plant Diversity in Kamelnomaden Nord-Kenias: German the Blue Nile Area, Sudan Original of Volume VII, Reprint (IV) Lenart, Severin: The Complexity (IX) Isir and Günther Schlee: Rendille of the Moment – Picturing an Ethno- and Ariaal – A Linguistic and Cultural graphic Project in South Africa and Affiliation Census I: Logologo: Sabam- Swaziland: Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Layers of the Oldest Egyptian Lexicon VIII: Numerals*
    Gábor Takács Department of Egyptology, Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary; [email protected] Layers of the oldest Egyptian lexicon VIII: Numerals* This paper belongs to a series of publications whose goal is to survey the most ancient part of Egyptian basic lexicon, classified by semantical domains, in order to stratify the different lexical layers (wherever they are present) in the light of Semitic vs. African Afro-Asiatic di- chotomy, which was already suggested by P. Lacau several decades ago. The current paper focuses on the etymologies of Egyptian numerals. Keywords: Ancient Egyptian, Afro-Asiatic languages, etymology, historical phonology, nu- merals. In memoriam A. Zaborski (1942–2014) Introduction The first part of my series “Layers of the oldest Egyptian lexicon”1 re-examined the controver- sies of P. Lacau’s (1970) old observation on a binary opposition of certain items of Ancient Egyptian anatomical terminology in the context of many new results issuing from current progress in Afro-Asiatic (Semito-Hamitic) comparative linguistics. The etymological examina- tion of Ancient Egyptian anatomical terminology presented therein has corroborated a sur- prising distribution: one member of the synonymous pairs is usually a Semitic word, whereas the other one(s) has/ve non-Semitic cognate(s) solely attested in some of the African branches of our language macrofamily. A relatively deeper presence of the extra-Semitic vocabulary in Egyptian has also become apparent. The subsequent papers in this series (“Layers of the oldest Egyptian lexicon II–VII”) focused on the rest of the Ancient Egyptian anatomical terminology,2 led by the wish to see to what degree this etymological dichotomy was characteristic there, * It is here that I have to express my thanks to the Bolyai research fellowship (Hungarian Academy of Sci- ences, reg.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section K
    K., Rupert (Fictitious character) K-T boundary Ka-ju-ken-bo USE Rupert (Fictitious character : Laporte) USE Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary USE Kajukenbo K-4 PRR 1361 (Steam locomotive) K-TEA (Achievement test) Ka-La-Bre-Osh (Game) USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) USE Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement USE Belote (Game) K-9 (Fictitious character) (Not Subd Geog) K-theory Kʻa-la-kʻun-lun kung lu (China and Pakistan) UF K-Nine (Fictitious character) [QA612.33] USE Karakoram Highway (China and Pakistan) K9 (Fictitious character) BT Algebraic topology Ka Lae o Kilauea (Hawaii) K 37 (Military aircraft) Homology theory USE Kilauea Point (Hawaii) USE Junkers K 37 (Military aircraft) NT Whitehead groups Ka Lang (Vietnamese people) K 98 k (Rifle) K. Tzetnik Award in Holocaust Literature USE Giẻ Triêng (Vietnamese people) USE Mauser K98k rifle UF Ka-Tzetnik Award Ka nanʻʺ (Burmese people) (May Subd Geog) K.A.L. Flight 007 Incident, 1983 Peras Ḳ. Tseṭniḳ [DS528.2.K2] USE Korean Air Lines Incident, 1983 Peras Ḳatseṭniḳ UF Ka tūʺ (Burmese people) K.A. Lind Honorary Award BT Literary prizes—Israel BT Ethnology—Burma USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris K2 (Pakistan : Mountain) ʾKa nao dialect (May Subd Geog) K.A. Linds hederspris UF Dapsang (Pakistan) BT China—Languages USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris Godwin Austen, Mount (Pakistan) Hmong language K-ABC (Intelligence test) Gogir Feng (Pakistan) Ka nō (Burmese people) USE Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children Mount Godwin Austen (Pakistan) USE Tha noʹ (Burmese people) K-B Bridge (Palau) BT Mountains—Pakistan Ka Rang (Southeast Asian people) USE Koro-Babeldaod Bridge (Palau) Karakoram Range USE Sedang (Southeast Asian people) K-BIT (Intelligence test) K2 (Drug) Kā Roimata o Hine Hukatere (N.Z.) USE Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test USE Synthetic marijuana USE Franz Josef Glacier/Kā Roimata o Hine K.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afroasiatic Languages
    CAMBRIDGE LANGUAGE SURVEYS Generaleditors P. Austin (University ofMelbourne) THE AFROASIATIC J. Bresnan (Stanford University) B. Comrie (Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig) LANGUAGES S. Crain (University of Maryland) W. Dressler (University of Vienna) C. J. E wen ( University of Leiden) R. Lass (University of Cape Town) D. Lightfoot ( University of Mary/and) K. Rice (Vniversity ofToronto) I. Roberts (University of Cambridge) Edited by S. Romaine (University of Oxford) N. V. Smith (Vniversity College, London) ZYGMUNT FRAJZYNGIER This series offers general accounts of the major language families of the ERIN SHAY world, with volumes organized either on a purely genetic basis or on a geographical basis, whichever yields the most convenient and intelligible grouping in each case. Each volume compares and contrasts the typological features of the languages it deals with. lt also treats the relevant genetic relationships, historical development, and sociolinguistic issues arising from their role and use in the world today. The books are intended for linguists from undergraduate level upwards, but no special knowledge of the languages under consideration is assumed. Volumes such as those on Australia and the Amazon Basin are also of wider relevance, as the future of the languages and their speakers raises important social and political issues. Volumes already published include Chinese Jerry Norman The Languages of Japan Masayoshi Shibatani Pidgins and Creoles (Volume I: Theory and Structure; Volume II: Reference Survey) John A. Holm The Indo-Aryan Languages Colin Masica The Celtic Languages edited by Donald MacAulay The Romance Languages Rebecca Posner The Amazonian Languages edited by R. M. W. Dixon and Alexandra Y.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section K
    K., Rupert (Fictitious character) Homology theory Ka nanʻʺ (Burmese people) (May Subd Geog) USE Rupert (Fictitious character : Laporte) NT Whitehead groups [DS528.2.K2] K-4 PRR 1361 (Steam locomotive) K. Tzetnik Award in Holocaust Literature UF Ka tūʺ (Burmese people) USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) UF Ka-Tzetnik Award BT Ethnology—Burma K-9 (Fictitious character) (Not Subd Geog) Peras Ḳ. Tseṭniḳ ʾKa nao dialect (May Subd Geog) UF K-Nine (Fictitious character) Peras Ḳatseṭniḳ BT China—Languages K9 (Fictitious character) BT Literary prizes—Israel Hmong language K 37 (Military aircraft) K2 (Pakistan : Mountain) Ka nō (Burmese people) USE Junkers K 37 (Military aircraft) UF Dapsang (Pakistan) USE Tha noʹ (Burmese people) K 98 k (Rifle) Godwin Austen, Mount (Pakistan) Ka Rang (Southeast Asian people) USE Mauser K98k rifle Gogir Feng (Pakistan) USE Sedang (Southeast Asian people) K.A.L. Flight 007 Incident, 1983 Mount Godwin Austen (Pakistan) Ka-taw USE Korean Air Lines Incident, 1983 BT Mountains—Pakistan USE Takraw K.A. Lind Honorary Award Karakoram Range Ka Tawng Luang (Southeast Asian people) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris K2 (Drug) USE Phi Tong Luang (Southeast Asian people) K.A. Linds hederspris USE Synthetic marijuana Kā Tiritiri o te Moana (N.Z.) USE Moderna museets vänners skulpturpris K3 (Pakistan and China : Mountain) USE Southern Alps/Kā Tiritiri o te Moana (N.Z.) K-ABC (Intelligence test) USE Broad Peak (Pakistan and China) Ka-Tu USE Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children K4 (Pakistan and China : Mountain) USE Kha Tahoi K-B Bridge (Palau) USE Gasherbrum II (Pakistan and China) Ka tūʺ (Burmese people) USE Koro-Babeldaod Bridge (Palau) K4 Locomotive #1361 (Steam locomotive) USE Ka nanʻʺ (Burmese people) K-BIT (Intelligence test) USE 1361 K4 (Steam locomotive) Ka-Tzetnik Award USE Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test K5 (Pakistan and China : Mountain) USE K.
    [Show full text]
  • Beja Versus Nilo-Saharan: on the Lexical Witness of Mutual Contacts
    FOLIA ORIENTALIA VOL. 51 2014 Václav Blažek Department of Linguistics and Baltic Studies Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno Czech Republic [email protected] BEJA VERSUS NILO-SAHARAN: ON THE LEXICAL WITNESS OF MUTUAL CONTACTS Abstract. In the article the mutual lexical connections between Beja and Nilo-Saharan neighbors, namely Nile-Nubian, Kunama and Nara, are summarized and analyzed from the point of view to determine the orientation of vector of borrowing. Keywords: Beja, Nilo-Saharan, Nubian, Kunama, Nara = Barea, language contact, lexical borrowing. In the recent time, namely in the 19th and 20th centuries, the Beja dialects were in a direct contact with three Nilo-Saharan groups: A. Nubian, represented by its northernmost branches, Nobiin and Kenuzi & Dongola; B. Kunama; C. Nara (= Barea). The main purpose of this study is to map these mutual contacts and to determine the vectors of borrowings. For this reason the Cushitic or Afroasiatic cognates for Beja and Nilo-Saharan cognates for Nubian, Kunama and Nara are analyzed. Most of the present comparisons were proposed by Reinisch 1874, 1890, 1895, 1911 (R74, R90, R95, R11), and summarized by Murray 1923 (M) A. Beja-Nubian lexical parallels 1. Beja émbaḍ, émbaj “(Stroh)matte” (R95, 16) = b’aḍ & umb’aḍ “birsh matting” (Roper) Nubian: KDM nébid “mat, bedding”, K also níbit (R11, 111; M 128). The primary source should be sought in Egyptian (New Kingdom) nbd “flechten; Flechtwerk, Geflochtenes (Korb, Sieb etc.)” (Wb. II, 246), Demotic nbt “to 319 Václav Blažek wrap; wicker-work”, Coptic Bohairic nubt “to weave”, nebti “plait, tress” (Černý 1976, 107).
    [Show full text]
  • © 2010 Mary Eliza Johannes
    © 2010 Mary Eliza Johannes THE DYNAMICS OF FEMALE ACCESS TO FORMAL SCHOOLING AMONG PASTORALIST COMMUNITIES IN KENYA: A CASE OF TURKANA DISTRICT IN NORTHWESTERN KENYA BY MARY ELIZA JOHANNES DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Policy Studies in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Antonia Darder, Chair Professor James Anderson Assistant Professor Christopher Span Assistant Professor Maurice Amutabi, Central Washington University Abstract In the Kenyan government’s Sessional Paper No. 1 of 1965, entitled African Socialism and its Application to Planning in Kenya, it was clearly stated that “Education must serve the needs of national development and prepare Kenya’s youth with the knowledge, skills, and the expertise required to enable the young population to collectively play an effective role in the life of Kenya while at the same time, ensuring that opportunities are provided for the full development of individuals advancement.” The objectives of educational opportunities for the population of Kenya outlined in the Sessional Papers are well defined but are not enjoyed by the nomadic pastoralists of Northwestern Kenya. On the whole, Kenya has achieved an impressive national literacy rate of 86% for men and 70% for women since gaining independence in 1964. However, regional and gender disparities exist, and of concern are the high dropout rates of girls compared to boys. The national completion rate for girls in primary school is 35%, while it is 55% for boys. The rate is lower in pastoralist districts such as Turkana, where the completion rate for girls stands at 3% and 4% for boys.
    [Show full text]
  • The Notion of Borders and State Among the Rendille in North Kenya
    BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT STUDIES “Rendilleland”- The Notion of Borders and State Among the Rendille in North Kenya THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS HILAH SEGAL UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. LYNN SCHLER OCTOBER 2013 BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT STUDIES “Rendilleland”- The Notion of Borders and State Among the Rendille in North Kenya THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS HILAH SEGAL UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF DR. LYNN SCHLER Signature of student: Date: 17/10/2013 Signature of supervisors: Date: 17/10/2013 OCTOBER 2013 Acknowledgements The idea for my thesis dawned on me during my trip to Kenya, sitting in the open air after spending a week in a nomadic livestock camp, beside the town of Korr in Northern Kenya. I had come to Northern Kenya in search of adventure and had made several friends. During our conversations, I didn't think of the fact and I lost the notion of our coming from different places and just lived the present. Therefore, my thesis is about people’s perceptions. I wanted to investigate how people similar but yet different to me, grasp their environment and reality. None of this was possible without the great support of my supervisor Dr. Lynn Schler, who has been much more than a supervisor to me. Her dedication and support have been invaluable throughout this three-year project.
    [Show full text]