"Janus Pannonius's Vocabularium" : the Complex Analysis of the Ms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antiquitas • Byzantium • Renascentia XIV. “Janus Pannonius’s Vocabularium” Pannonius’s “Janus ANT I U YZ M B R E S N A A T S I C U E N Q I T T I A Zsuzsanna Ötvös N A MMXIII “Janus Pannonius’s Vocabularium” Zsuzsanna Ötvös Ötvös Zsuzsanna Th e Complex Analysis of the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 ELTE Eötvös József Collegium 2015 “Janus Pannonius’s Vocabularium” The Complex Analysis of the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 Antiquitas • Byzantium • Renascentia XIV. Edited by Zoltán Farkas László Horváth Tamás Mészáros “Janus Pannonius’s Vocabularium” The Complex Analysis of the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 Zsuzsanna Ötvös ELTE Eötvös József Collegium Budapest, 2015 This work received support from the Hungarian Scientific Research Found within the research project OTKA NN 104456 All rights reserved ELTE Eötvös József Collegium, Budapest, 2015 Felelős kiadó: Dr. Horváth László, az ELTE Eötvös József Collegium igazgatója Borítóterv: Egedi-Kovács Emese Copyright © Eötvös Collegium 2015 © A szerző Minden jog fenntartva! A nyomdai munkákat a Komáromi Nyomda és Kiadó Kft. végezte 2900 Komárom, Igmándi út 1. Felelős vezető: Kovács János ISSN 2064-2369 ISBN 978-615-5371-41-7 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to express my thanks to Dr. László Horváth, my su- pervisor, who first suggested this research topic to me and constantly sup- ported me all through the research work by helping with useful comments and insights and also with the organization of projects and scholarships. I am also grateful to Edina Zsupán (Manuscript Collection, Országos Széchenyi Könyvtár, Budapest) for reading the draft versions of some parts of my dis- sertation and for sharing her most valuable ideas and suggestions with me. I am most grateful to Dr. Christian Gastgeber (Institut für Byzanzforschung, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften), who helped me a lot both with useful suggestions and comments on my work and with administra- tive issues during my four-month stay as a guest scholar in the Institut für Byzanzforschung in Vienna. I am also grateful to all of the participants of the doctoral seminars – fellow PhD students and instructors at the Departments of Greek and Latin, Institute of Classical Studies, Eötvös Loránd University – who read through and commented on my drafts in meticulous detail. I would like to express my thanks to the staff at the Manuscript Collection of the Österreichische Nationalbibliothek in Vienna, at the Manuscript Collection of the Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg, at the Manuscript Collection of the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munich and at the ELTE University Library for their assistance in providing me with access to original or digitalized manu- scripts. I am also grateful to my opponents, Dr. Gábor Bolonyai and Dr. Gyula Mayer, who have provided me with most useful comments and insights on my dissertation in their detailed evaluations. Last but not least, my thanks are due to my family, who supported me in all possible ways I needed during my research work. Vocabularium 9 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 13 I The Codicological Description of the Cod. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 ......................... 15 1 The history of studying the manuscript ................................................................... 16 2 Physical characteristics of the manuscript ...............................................................21 2.1 Basic data of the manuscript and its condition .................................................... 22 2.2 Watermarks .................................................................................................................22 2.3 Folio and page numbering ........................................................................................ 23 2.4 Gatherings and catchwords ......................................................................................25 2.5 Scribes .......................................................................................................................... 27 2.5.1 Janus Pannonius as scribe? ...................................................................................... 27 2.5.2 The Greek script of the main text ............................................................................. 31 2.5.3 The Latin script of the main text .............................................................................. 34 2.5.4 The Greek script of the marginalia ........................................................................... 37 2.5.5 The Latin script of the marginalia ............................................................................ 38 2.6 Binding......................................................................................................................... 40 2.7 Book-plates ................................................................................................................. 41 3 The content of the manuscript ................................................................................... 43 3.1 Greek-Latin dictionary (ff. 1r-298r) ........................................................................ 43 3.2 Greek-Latin thematic wordlist (f. 298r-v) .............................................................. 44 3.3 Latin-Greek dictionary (ff. 299r-320r) .................................................................... 46 3.4 Proverbia e Plutarchi operibus excerpta (f. 320r-v) ............................................. 49 3.5 Proverbia alphabetice ordinata (ff. 321r-326v) ..................................................... 50 3.6 Corporis humani partes (ff. 327r-328v) .................................................................. 52 3.7 Qui rem metricam invenerint (f. 328v) ...................................................................53 3.8 Short note (f. 329r) .....................................................................................................53 3.9 Blank pages (ff. 329v-333v) .......................................................................................53 4 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 54 II The Provenience of the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 .................................................. 57 1 The manuscript in Italy................................................................................................ 57 2 From Italy to Hungary: Janus Pannonius as the possessor of the codex ..............58 3 The manuscript in the stock of the Bibliotheca Corviniana .................................. 60 4 From Hungary to Vienna ............................................................................................. 63 5 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 68 III The Textual History of the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 .......................................... 69 1 Literary overview and the codex Harleianus 5792 .................................................. 70 2 Codices recentiores stemming from the cod. Harleianus 5792 ..................................73 2.1 Collating the Greek-Latin vocabulary lists in ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 and 47 ........... 79 2.2 Collating the Greek-Latin dictionaries in ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45, Mon. Gr. 142 and 253 ..................................................................................................86 10 Zsuzsanna Ötvös 2.3 Collating the Greek-Latin vocabulary lists in ÖNB Supp. Gr. 45 and Σ I 12 ....... 96 3 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 104 IV Marginal Notes in the Ms. ÖNB Suppl. Gr. 45 ................................................. 107 1 Glossary notes of predominantly Greek literary origin ........................................108 1.1 Glossary notes quoting Aristophanic scholia ...................................................... 108 1.1.1 General characteristics .......................................................................................... 108 1.1.2 The origin of the Aristophanic glossary notes ...................................................... 112 1.1.3 Divergences from the Aristophanic scholia ........................................................... 116 1.2 Glossary notes of legal source ................................................................................119 1.2.1 General characteristics .......................................................................................... 119 1.2.2 The origin of the legal glossary notes .................................................................... 119 1.3 Other glossary notes of Greek literary origin ......................................................136 1.4 Glossary notes of non-literary origin ................................................................... 138 1.5 Collation with the marginalia in the Madrid codex Σ I 12................................. 139 2 A group of marginal notes from another textual tradition.................................. 145 2.1 General characteristics ........................................................................................... 145 2.2 The origin of the glossary notes ............................................................................ 147 3 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 158 V Conclusions ...............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • PDF Van Tekst
    De correspondentie van Desiderius Erasmus. Deel 16. Brieven 2204-2356 Desiderius Erasmus Vertaald door: Tineke ter Meer bron Desiderius Erasmus, De correspondentie van Desiderius Erasmus. Deel 16. Brieven 2204-2356 (vert. Tineke L. ter Meer). Ad. Donker, Rotterdam 2018 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/eras001corr17_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. 9 Inleiding Erasmus van augustus 1529 t/m juli 1530 Uit de periode 9 augustus 1529 tot en met 31 juli 1530 zijn 156 brieven van en aan Erasmus bekend. De vorm waarin ze zijn overgeleverd varieert van een geautoriseerde gedrukte versie tot een rommelig kladje vol doorhalingen. Tot die laatste categorie horen elf brieven van de jurist Bonifacius Amerbach, hoogleraar aan de universiteit van Bazel. Van Erasmus ontving hij in deze periode eenzelfde aantal eigenhandig geschreven brieven en nog twee waarvan alleen kopieën bekend zijn. Al deze brieven dragen het karakter van privé-correspondentie. Dat laatste geldt bij uitstek voor hun brieven over Erasmius Froben, de jongste zoon van de overleden drukker Johann Froben en petekind van Erasmus. De ongeveer vijftienjarige jongen had enige tijd bij zijn peetvader in Freiburg doorgebracht en was vervolgens door zijn beduidend oudere halfbroer Hieronymus weer meegenomen naar Bazel. Blijkbaar liepen de meningen uiteen hoe de verdere opleiding van Erasmius eruit moest zien. Erasmus ziet hem het liefst in Leuven studeren, maar de familie heeft daar andere gedachten over. Helemaal zeker van zijn zaak is ook Erasmus zelf niet. Terug in Bazel laat de jongen niets van zich horen en blijkens brief 2229 had hij een briefje dat de grote geleerde aan hem had geschreven in Freiburg laten liggen.
    [Show full text]
  • History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning
    History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning • • nancy g. siraisi the university of michigan press • ann arbor Copyright © by the University of Michigan 2007 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid-free paper 2010 2009 2008 2007 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siraisi, Nancy G. History, medicine, and the traditions of Renaissance learning / Nancy G. Siraisi. p. cm. — (Cultures of knowledge in the early modern world) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-472-11602-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-472-11602-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Medicine—History—16th century. 2. Renaissance. I. Title. R146.S57 2008 610.9—dc22 2007010656 ISBN13 978-0-472-02548-0 (electronic) For nobuyuki siraisi PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his book is a study of connections, parallels, and mutual interaction T between two in›uential disciplines, medicine and history, in ‹fteenth- to seventeenth-century Europe. The elevation of history in status and signi‹- cance, the expansion of the scope and methods of history, and the related (but distinct) growth of antiquarianism are among the most striking—and recently among the best studied—features of the humanist culture of that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Renaissance and Reformation, 1993
    ^ Unica Oblatio Christi: Eucharistie Sacrifice and the first Zurich Disputation KEITH D. LEWIS S ummary: The First Zurich Disputation (January 29th, 1523) between Ulrich Zwingli and Johann Faber was the earliest Reformation-era public debate of the doctrine of the eucharistie sacrifice. While Zwingli was at an early and relatively fluid stage in his rejection of eucharistie sacrifice, Faber's defense employed not only traditional scholastic sources but other authoritative supports previously unused in the defense of doctrine. Never- theless, the polemical atmosphere of the exchange between the two both during and after the disputation precluded true clarity andpotential common ground on this issue. For ten long years, our opponents have written many books asserting that the mass is a sacrifice, and yet not one of them has defined what sacrifice is or is not [Philip Melanchthon, Apologia Confessionis XXIV, XII, 15 (1531)]. The fact that Swiss reformer Ulrich Zwingli rejected any notion of eucharistie sacrifice and insisted on a strictly anamnetic eucharist early-on in his emer- gence as a reformer, is well-known. Yet for all that has been written concerning Zwingli' s eucharistie theology,^ surprisingly little attention has been paid to the actual circumstances of his initial rejection of the doctrine of eucharistie sacrifice in the theological context of the First Zurich Disputation of January 29th, 1523, during which the vicar-general of the diocese of Constance Johann Faber ( 1478-1541) emerged as an impromptu and reluctant debating opponent to ZwingH, with whom Faber had been on friendly terms. This is especially surprising, when one considers that the Zurich meeting appears to have been the first public debate in the sixteenth century between a controversial theologian and a major reformation personality concerning the doctrine of eucharistie sacrifice.
    [Show full text]
  • CO:L\ CORDIA THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY
    CO:l\ CORDIA THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY The Presence of Christ's Body and Blood in the Sacrament of rhe Altar According to Luther NORMAN NAGEL The Theology of Communism MARTIN H. SCHARLEMANN Thomas More and the Wittenberg Lutherans CARL S. MEYER Pietism: Classical and Modem - A Comparison of Two Representative Descriptions EGON W. GERDES Homiletics Brief Studies Book Review VolXXXIX April 1968 No.4 Thomas More and t~1e Wittenberg Lutherans CARL S. MEYER man for all seasons" was also a po­ few scholars about the 16th century4 have A lemicist, although this is not gen­ told in some detail the story about the re­ erally noted. Some of Thomas More's lations between More and Luther. Only biographers,l writers about the relation­ Sister Gertrude Donnelly investigated these ships between Henry VIII and Martin Lu­ relations comprehensively.5 One can learn ther,2 one biographer of Luther,S and a something about some aspects of these re­ lations from secondary sources, although 1 Algernon Cecil, A Portrait of Thomas the accounts may be distorted. Sometimes More: Scholar, Statesman, Saint (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1937), pp.193-207. How­ reference is made to the polemic More ever, R. W. Chambers, Thomas More (London: wrote against Bugenhagen.6 No writer Jonathan Cape, 1935), p. 193, has only a brief seems to have noticed, or at least has not reference to this topic. W. E. Campbell, Eras­ mus, Tyndale and More (London: Eyre and thought it worthwhile mentioning, that Spottiswoode, 1949), pp.148-52, 220-22, More never wrote against the Wittenberg does not mention More's work, under the pseu- donym of Wr::___ ::-...
    [Show full text]
  • April 2007 Newsletter
    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 24, No. 1 www.hnanews.org April 2007 Have a Drink at the Airport! Jan Pieter van Baurscheit (1669–1728), Fellow Drinkers, c. 1700. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. Exhibited Schiphol Airport, March 1–June 5, 2007 HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park NJ 08904 Telephone/Fax: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Officers President - Wayne Franits Professor of Fine Arts Syracuse University Syracuse NY 13244-1200 Vice President - Stephanie Dickey Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Treasurer - Leopoldine Prosperetti Johns Hopkins University North Charles Street Baltimore MD 21218 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Marc-Chagall-Str. 68 D-55127 Mainz Germany Board Members Contents Ann Jensen Adams Krista De Jonge HNA News .............................................................................. 1 Christine Göttler Personalia ................................................................................ 2 Julie Hochstrasser Exhibitions ............................................................................... 2 Alison Kettering Ron Spronk Museum News ......................................................................... 5 Marjorie E. Wieseman Scholarly Activities Conferences: To Attend ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Die Unterrichtseinheit Zum Film Sus Sek Ii
    DIE UNTERRICHTSEINHEIT ZUM FILM SUS SEK II Inhaltsverzeichnis 2 Die Unterrichtseinheit Impressum zum Film „Zwingli“ SUS / SEK II INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / IMPRESSUM SET 1 SET 5 Figurengruppe Anna Reinhart und Figurengruppe Christoph Froschauer Katharina von Zimmern 3 und Söldner 43 – – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 4 AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 44 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 5 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 45 AB 3 Steckbrief 7 AB 3 Steckbrief 47 AB 4 Materialset 1: Anna Reinhart und AB 4 Materialset 5: Christoph Froschauer Katharina von Zimmern 8 und Söldner 48 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 10 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 50 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 12 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 52 SET 2 SET 6 Figurengruppe Gerold und Bettlerjunge 13 Zwingli und der Krieg 53 – – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 14 AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 54 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 15 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 55 AB 3 Steckbrief 17 AB 3 Steckbrief 57 AB 4 Materialset 2: Gerold und Bettlerjunge 18 AB 4 Materialset 6: Zwingli und der Krieg 58 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 20 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 60 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 22 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 62 SET 3 Figurengruppe Leo Jud und Felix Manz 23 – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 24 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 25 AB 3 Steckbrief 27 AB 4 Materialset 3: Leo Jud und Felix Manz 28 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 30 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 32 IMPRESSUM – AutorInnen: SET 4 Prof. Dr. Karin Fuchs (Dozentin) mit Fabian Blaser und Figurengruppe
    [Show full text]
  • Ulrich Zwingli (1484–1531)
    Ulrich Zwingli (1484–1531) Conditions in Switzerland • Holy Roman Empire divided into provinces where the loyalty was primarily toward local governments • Swiss Republic consisted of 13 provinces or cantons • Humanism was becoming more and more popular (thanks to the influence of Erasmus) • Religious corruption evident (Huss had been burned to death at Constance in 1415; papacy was in obvious disrepair; local church leaders were morally corrupt) • Switzerland was ripe for a reformation Switzerland (1515) Born January 1, 1484 (Wildhaus) Wildhaus Early Life • Born in Wildhaus, seven weeks after Martin Luther • His fhfather was a ciiivic ldleader (ba iliff) in the town • His parents wanted him to pursue the priesthood • Attended school at Basel and Bern • Entered UUestyniversity of Vieeanna in 1500 • Finished at University of Basel in 1504 • Hig hly iflinfluence d by Thomas WttWyttenb ac h, and thus exposed to Erasmus and Religious Humanism in Basel • RidReceived his Mt’Master’s degree in 1506 Bern (old city) University of Vienna Old University of Basel Zwingli was highly influenced by the teachings of Erasmus; who himself had spent some time at the University of Basel (1514–16; 1521–29) As a result, Zwingli had a strong interest in Scripture and biblical thlheology; he was eager to see reform take place in the Catholic Church Erasmus Earlyyy Ministry • Became priest in Galarus (1506); a position he purchased for 100 guilders (a few hundred dollars) • Also served as a chaplain for Swiss troops • Wrote against abuses in the French and Swiss
    [Show full text]
  • Rechenschieber Von Faber-Castell
    Rechenschieber Slide Rules A.W. Faber A.W. Faber-Castell Modelle, Typen, Skalen Models, Types, Scales V 8.0 Peter Holland Peter Holland unter Mitarbeit von, in co-operation with Dieter von Jezierski Günter Kugel David Rance Rechenschieber - Slide Rules A.W. Faber - A.W. Faber-Castell Modelle, Typen, Skalen Models, Types, Scales © 2020, Digitale Ausgabe, V 8.0 © 2020, Digital Edition, V 8.0 Kontakt zum Autor, to contact the author: [email protected] Titelfoto: Faber-Castell, Modell 367 Cover picture: Faber-Castell model 367 Jegliche Haftung für die Richtigkeit des gesamten Werkes kann trotz sorgfältiger Prüfung nicht übernommen werden. Die im Buch genannten Produkte, Warenzeichen und Firmennamen sind in der Regel durch deren Inhaber geschützt. Despite all possible care and attention, no liability for the correctness of the contents is accepted. The products named in the book, the trademarks and company names are, as a rule, protected by the owner. Dieses Werk ist lizenziert unter einer Creative Commons Namensnennung - Nicht kommerziell - Keine Bearbeitungen 4.0 International Lizenz. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial - NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 1 Vorwort und Dank S. 5 2 Erläuterungen zum Gebrauch S. 8 3 Rechenschieber-Modelle S. 13 3.1 Frühe Modelle ohne Nummerierung S. 19 3.2 Serie 3xx S. 20 3.3 Serie D S. 28 3.4 Serie 1/xx/3xx S. 28 3.5 Serie 'hel', 'kad', 'cme' S. 30 3.6 Serie 1/xx S. 30 3.7 Serie 2/xx, 2/xxN S. 33 3.8 Serie 3/xx/3xx S.
    [Show full text]
  • Doubt, the Book Under Review Has Presented Fresh Material for Further Research on the Topic
    comptes rendus 283 doubt, the book under review has presented fresh material for further research on the topic. sergius kodera University of Vienna https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v43i3.35321 Brevaglieri, Sabina. Natural desiderio di sapere. Roma barocca fra vecchi e nuovi mondi. La corte dei papi 31. Rome: Viella, 2019. Pp. 476 + 32 ill. ISBN 978-8-8331- 3233-4 (paperback) €49. Sabina Brevaglieri’s book Natural desiderio di sapere. Roma barocca fra vecchi e nuovi mondi is an original and welcome addition to scholarship which brings together work on the history of science and medicine, art patronage, scholarly networks, cultural diplomacy, and urban history. Her impressive evocation of the intellectual fervour in Rome in the first half of the seventeenth century, which saw the creation of the Accademia dei lincei in 1603 by Federico Cesi and the presence in Rome of key European intellectuals, makes the city come alive. Readers are treated to a riveting depiction of the city and the learned players involved in sharing and disputing ideas and circulating new knowledge about the Asian and American worlds. The protagonists are at once the Eternal City itself, at the time a key centre of exchange and mediation, and the botanists, physicians, mathematicians, philosophers, artists, and scientists who lived there. The result is a vivid glimpse into the dynamics that brought them together in the space of a few decades especially propitious for intellectual discovery and exchange. Organized in six chapters, the book is dense and full of detail while at the same time highly readable and accessible to those who are not grounded in the history of science or medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Zwingli on Baptism: His Incipient Philosophical Dualism As the Genesis of Faith Only
    Zwingli on Baptism: His Incipient Philosophical Dualism as the Genesis of Faith Only By Mark Moore Rel. 671: History of Christianity and Judaism Dr. Stan Burgess November 8, 1999 Outline I. Brief Summary of Zwingli as a Reformer II. Consensus View of Baptism A. Scriptural Foundation B. Testimony of Church Fathers III. Zwingli’s View of Baptism A. Zwingli’s Emerging Definition of Baptism 1. Assurance of Faith 2. A Pledge of Allegiance 3. A Sign of Belonging A. Zwingli and the Baptismal Texts 1. Christian Baptism Is the Same as the Baptism of John the Baptist 2. Separate Types of Baptism in the New Testament 3. Synecdoche as the Solution to Problematic Texts B. Reasons for His Position 1. Sovereignty of God in Election a. Only the Blood of Christ Can Take Away Sins b. God must Be Free to Act Whenever and However He Chooses c. Salvation Is Dependent Only upon One’s Election 2. Incipient Philosophic Dualism a. The Flesh is Evil and Earthly; the Spirit is Good & from God b. A Material Thing Such as Water Cannot Cleanse the Soul II. Ecclesiastical Ramifications of Zwingli’s Theological Innovation A. A Shift from Sacrament to Cognition B. A Shift from Community to Individualism C. A Shift from Covenant to Fatalism Zwingli on Baptism: His Incipient Philosophical Dualism as the Geneses of Faith Only Huldrych Zwingli stands in the third position behind Luther and Calvin in the trilogy of Protestant reformers. Yet in some ways his influence is even more important than the other two. That is certainly true in the area of “faith only.” He was clearly the first to espouse the view that the sacraments of baptism and the Eucharist had nothing to do with salvation.
    [Show full text]
  • Balthasar Hubmaier's Sword
    Balthasar Hubmaier’s Sword: A Circumstantial Development by Rudolph Henry Wiens A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo and Conrad Grebel University College in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Theological Studies Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2010 © Rudolph Henry Wiens 2010 Author’s Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made available electronically to the public. ii Abstract The sixteenth century Bavarian Anabaptist, Balthasar Hubmaier (ca. 1480-1528), has had a disputed role in Anabaptist historiography ever since his martyrdom in March, 1528. On the one hand he is known as the most erudite and prolific writer of the early Anabaptists, and on the other he has been separated from the original Zurich Brethren by his rejection of two major principles, total separation from the world and absolute non- resistance, that were supposedly held unanimously by the Zurich Brethren. Today Hubmaier’s reputation for militancy has been endorsed by most writers, but this militancy is not expressed in any of his writings except On the Sword, the last tract written before his death. Using the well-documented biography of Hubmaier by Bergsten and his own writings collected and translated by Pipkin and Yoder, the thesis explores the question of the extent to which Hubmaier was willing to advocate the use of lethal force by government or against government. It is found that only one source, Johann Faber, accused Hubmaier of inciting peasant revolt , and that witness would seem dubious by any modern standard.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    DIPLOMARBEIT Titel der Diplomarbeit „Quae regna potentia vidi, exposui lustranda oculis – Paratexte in Herbersteins Moscovia“ verfasst von Cornelia Permesser angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag.phil.) Wien, 2015 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 190 338 362 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Lehramtsstudium UF >Latein< UF >Russisch< Betreut von: ao.Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Elisabeth Klecker 2 … ego cum a Caesare Maximiliano legatus in Moscoviam missus eram … … Oratores ad se ordine vocat, Leonharde Sigismunde dicens venisti a Magno Domino, ad Magnum Dominum, fecisti magnum iter, vidisti gratiam nostram, et serenos oculos nostros, bibe & ebibe, & bene ede usque ad saturitatem, deinde quiesces, ut tandem ad Dominum tuum redire possis. Sigmund von Herberstein Rerum Moscoviticarum Commentarii 3 4 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Danksagung …............................................................................................................... 7 2 Einleitung ….................................................................................................................. 8 3 Das Leben des Sigmund von Herberstein i…................................................................. 9 4 Ausgaben der Rerum Moscoviticarum Commentarii ….............................................. 16 4.1 Die lateinische Erstausgabe …............................................................................... 17 4.2 Die zweite lateinische Ausgabe …......................................................................... 22 4.3 Die dritte lateinische
    [Show full text]