DOCSLIB.ORG

CO:L\ CORDIA THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CO:l\ CORDIA THEOLOGICAL MONTHLY The Presence of Christ's Body and Blood in the Sacrament of rhe Altar According to Luther NORMAN NAGEL The Theology of Communism MARTIN H. SCHARLEMANN Thomas More and the Wittenberg Lutherans CARL S. MEYER Pietism: Classical and Modem - A Comparison of Two Representative Descriptions EGON W. GERDES Homiletics Brief Studies Book Review VolXXXIX April 1968 No.4 Thomas More and t~1e Wittenberg Lutherans CARL S. MEYER man for all seasons" was also a po­ few scholars about the 16th century4 have A lemicist, although this is not gen­ told in some detail the story about the re­ erally noted. Some of Thomas More's lations between More and Luther. Only biographers,l writers about the relation­ Sister Gertrude Donnelly investigated these ships between Henry VIII and Martin Lu­ relations comprehensively.5 One can learn ther,2 one biographer of Luther,S and a something about some aspects of these re­ lations from secondary sources, although 1 Algernon Cecil, A Portrait of Thomas the accounts may be distorted. Sometimes More: Scholar, Statesman, Saint (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1937), pp.193-207. How­ reference is made to the polemic More ever, R. W. Chambers, Thomas More (London: wrote against Bugenhagen.6 No writer Jonathan Cape, 1935), p. 193, has only a brief seems to have noticed, or at least has not reference to this topic. W. E. Campbell, Eras­ mus, Tyndale and More (London: Eyre and thought it worthwhile mentioning, that Spottiswoode, 1949), pp.148-52, 220-22, More never wrote against the Wittenberg does not mention More's work, under the pseu- donym of Wr::___ ::-.... , against luther. E. E. ~hilipp Melanchthon. The pres­ Reynolds, Saint Thomas More (London: Burns ent investigation is an attempt to sum­ and Oates, 1953), pp.163-66, has noted the marize the relations between Thomas book by "Ross." Christopher Hollis, Sir Thomas More (London: Sheed and Ward, 1934), pp. More and the Wittenberg Lutherans, not, 124-28, 139-46. Theodore Maynard, Hu­ however, including More's attacks against manist As Hero: The Life of Sir Thomas More (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1947), pp. mand, ed. Luigi Cappa delta (London: Kegan 139-47. Thomas Stapleton, The Life and Il­ Paul, Trench, Tiibner & Co., Ltd., 1915), III, lustrious Martyrdom of Sir Thomas More, trans. 70; IV, 9; V, 110; VI, 246. Philip E. Hallett, ed. E. E. Reynolds (New York: Fordham University Press, 1966), p.31. 4 E. g., Robert P. Adams, The Better Part of Valor: More, Erasmus, Colet, and Vives on Hu­ 2 Neelak S. Tjernagel, Henry VIII and the Lutherans: A Study in Anglo-Lutheran Relations manism, War, and Peace, 1496-1535 (Seattle: from 1521 to 1527 (St. Louis: Concordia Pub­ University of Washington Press, 1962), pp. 195, lishing House, 1965), pp. 24-25; Erwin Doem­ 274-76; H. Maynard Smith, Henry VIII and berg, Henry VIII and Luther: An Account of the Reformation (London: Macmillan & Co., Their Personal Relations (London: Barrie and Ltd., 1948), p. 412. Rockliff, 1961), pp.35-37; Preserved Smith, 5 Sister Gertrude Joseph Donnelly, A Trans­ "Luther and Henry VIII," English Historical Re­ lation 0/ St. Thomas More's Responsio ad Lu­ view, XXV (October 1910), 656-69; William therum with an Introduction and Notes, vol. Dallmann, "King Henry Attacks Luther," Con­ XXIII of the Catholic University of America cordia Theological Monthly, VI (June 1935), Studies ;n Medieval and Renaissance Latin Lan­ 419-30. guage and Literature (Washington, D. c.: The 3 Hartmann Grisar, Luther, trans. E. M. La- Catholic University of America Press, 1962)_ Printed too late for consideration by this writer The author is professor in the Department was John Headley, "More against Luther: On of Historical Theology and director of the Laws and the Magistrate," Moreana, XV (1967), School for Graduate Studies at Concordia 211-23. Seminary, St. Louis. He is a Fellow of the 6 Tjernagel, pp. 28-30; Reynolds, Saint Royal Historical Society. Thomas More, pp.166, 167. 246 THOMAS MORE AND THE WITTENBERG LUTHERANS 247 his countrymen who were in Wittenberg, published under the pseudonym of Ferdi­ William Tyndale and Robert Barnes? nand Barvellus,11 and then under the pseudonym of William ROSS.12 In it, in I accordance with the polemical style of the Martin Luther took notice of More's day, More quoted the verba Lutheri and Utopia in 1518; the Wittenberg scholar then brought counterarguments.13 A fa- was alive to the world of books,s at least at this stage of his career as a 34-year-old Gibson, St. Thomas More: A Preliminary Bib­ professor of theology. There is no record liography of His Works and Moreana to the Year 1750 (New Haven and London: Yale Uni­ of his reaction to More's work, however. versity Press, 1961), No. 171, pp. 170, 171, in­ Thomas More took notice of Luther, cludes a one-line summary. Cited as Gibson, particularly of his attack on Henry VIII, Bibliog1·aphy. Grisar, III, 237, comes to the de­ fense of More's language, which, however, he after the latter had penned the Assertio does not translate. See also F. and M. P. Sulli­ Septem Sacramerztorum. 9 No attempt will van, Moreana, G-M, p. 55. One of the most dis­ be made here to give all the details of torted comparisons between More and Luther came from the pen of T. Meyrick, "Unknown More's writings against Luther. Only a Works of Thomas More," Month, XIII (1870), few facts will be noted to make this sum­ 295-304, 709-14, summarized in F. and mary more rounded. M. P. Sullivan Moreana, G-M, pp. 320-22. is severest k "Luther delighted less in muck than many of In 1523 Mor the literary men of his age; but if he did in­ '38inst Luther.lO It "V8S a Latin work, first dulge, he excelled in this as in ev~,y other area of speech." Roland H. Bainton, He1'e 1 Stand 7 Tjernagel, p. 57: "More's bitterest invective (New York and Nashville: Abingdon-Cokes­ was to be reserved for Barnes and Tyndale." See bury Press, 1950), p.298. also pp. 63, 124, 125, 146. 11 Gibson, Bibliography, No. 62, pp. 82 to 8 Luther to John Lang, Wittenberg, 19 Feb. 83. The present writer has not seen the copy 1518, D. Martin Luthers Werke: Briefwechsel, which Gibson lists. Kritische Gesamtausgabe (Weimar: Herman 12, Eruditissimi viri Guilielmi. Rossei opus Bohlaus Nachfolger, 1930), J, 147, No. 60. Lu­ elegans, doctttm, /estiuum, pium quo pulcher­ ther's works are cited as WA. Gottfried G. Kro­ rime retegit, ac l'e/ellit insanas Luther;' calumnias: del did not translate this letter in Luther's quibus iniuctissirnttm Angliae Galliaeque regem Works: Letters I, vol. 48 of the American edition Henricvm eius nominis octauum, Fidei de/en­ (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1963). Luther sorem, haud literis minus q (quam) regno referred to the Utopia and Epigrammata pub­ clarum scurt'a turpissimus insectatur: excusum lished by Froben in Basel in March 1518. Frank denuo diligentissime, digestumque in capita, and :1vfajie Padberg Sullivan, Moreana: Materials adiunctis indicibtlS opera uiri doctissimi loan­ for the Study of Saint Thomas More, G-M (Los nis Carcellij (London: R. Pynson, 1523). Brit­ Angeles, Calif.: Loyola University of Los An­ ish Museum press-marks 1211. (2.) and 697.­ geles, 1965), p.25l. d.12. Cited as Ross. A. W. Pollard and G. R. 9 See references in n. 2 above. Redgrave, A Sho'l't-Title Catalogue 0/ Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and 0/ 10 Francis Atterbury, "An Answer to Some English Books Printed Abroad, 1475-1640 Considerations on the Spirit of Martin Luther (London: The Bibliographical Society, 1926), and the Origin of the Reformation ..." (Ox­ No. 18089. Cited as S. T. C. Gibson, Bibliog­ ford, at the theater, 1687, included in Atter­ raphy, No. 63, pp. 84-85. Donnelly, passim. bury's Sermons, 1727), had some very dis­ paraging remarks about More's book. See the 11- 13 Rainer Pineas, "Thomas More's Use of line summary in Frank and Majie Padberg Sul­ the Dialogue Form as a Weapon of Religious livan, Moreana: Materials for the Study of Saint Controversy," Studies in the Renaissance (New Thomas More, A-F (Los Angeles, Calif.: Loyola York: Renaissance Society of America, 1960), University of Los Angeles, 1964), p. 33. R. W. VII, 193-206. 248 THOMAS MORE AND THE WITTENBERG LUTHERANS vorable reference to Erasmus14 and an un­ Among the Wittenbergers, besides Lu­ favorable reference to Wyclyf, Hus, Hel­ ther, More attacked Bugenhagen directly. vidius, Arius, Momanus, and all the pesti­ John Bugenhagen (d. 1558), also known lent Lutherans15 are contained in this work. as Pommer or Pomeranus, J\{artin Luther's No good purpose is served in rehears­ pastor and father-confessor in Wittenberg, ing the details of More's arguments against addressed a letter to the English people Martin Luther, and to recite the invectives in 1525 under the title Epistola ad he hurled against the German reformer Anglos.ls It was reprinted in 1526 with (who was capable of returning blow for a response from John Cochlaeus,19 and blow) would not enhance the prestige of again in 1530. either More or Luther. More seems to The English translation of Bugenhagen's have had an especially bitter animosity letter was published in 1536 by an un­ against Luther, which did not allow him named and unknown printer as A com­ to state luther's position correctly.16 He pendious letter.20 More, who was be­ did not know Luther personally, but the headed in 1535, did not see this transla­ leadership role played by Luther in a tion.
Recommended publications
  • PDF Van Tekst

    PDF Van Tekst

    De correspondentie van Desiderius Erasmus. Deel 16. Brieven 2204-2356 Desiderius Erasmus Vertaald door: Tineke ter Meer bron Desiderius Erasmus, De correspondentie van Desiderius Erasmus. Deel 16. Brieven 2204-2356 (vert. Tineke L. ter Meer). Ad. Donker, Rotterdam 2018 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/eras001corr17_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. 9 Inleiding Erasmus van augustus 1529 t/m juli 1530 Uit de periode 9 augustus 1529 tot en met 31 juli 1530 zijn 156 brieven van en aan Erasmus bekend. De vorm waarin ze zijn overgeleverd varieert van een geautoriseerde gedrukte versie tot een rommelig kladje vol doorhalingen. Tot die laatste categorie horen elf brieven van de jurist Bonifacius Amerbach, hoogleraar aan de universiteit van Bazel. Van Erasmus ontving hij in deze periode eenzelfde aantal eigenhandig geschreven brieven en nog twee waarvan alleen kopieën bekend zijn. Al deze brieven dragen het karakter van privé-correspondentie. Dat laatste geldt bij uitstek voor hun brieven over Erasmius Froben, de jongste zoon van de overleden drukker Johann Froben en petekind van Erasmus. De ongeveer vijftienjarige jongen had enige tijd bij zijn peetvader in Freiburg doorgebracht en was vervolgens door zijn beduidend oudere halfbroer Hieronymus weer meegenomen naar Bazel. Blijkbaar liepen de meningen uiteen hoe de verdere opleiding van Erasmius eruit moest zien. Erasmus ziet hem het liefst in Leuven studeren, maar de familie heeft daar andere gedachten over. Helemaal zeker van zijn zaak is ook Erasmus zelf niet. Terug in Bazel laat de jongen niets van zich horen en blijkens brief 2229 had hij een briefje dat de grote geleerde aan hem had geschreven in Freiburg laten liggen.
  • The Movement for the Reformation of Manners, 1688-1715

    The Movement for the Reformation of Manners, 1688-1715

    THE MOVEMENT FOR THE REFORMATION OF MANNERS, 1688-1715 ANDREW GORDON CRAIG 1980 (reset and digitally formatted 2015) PREFACE TO THE 2015 VERSION This study was completed in the pre-digital era and since then has been relatively inaccessible to researchers. To help rectify that, the 1980 typescript submitted for the degree of PhD from Edinburgh University has been reset and formatted in Microsoft “Word” and Arial 12pt as an easily readable font and then converted to a read-only PDF file for circulation. It is now more compact than the original typescript version and fully searchable. Some minor typographical errors have been corrected but no material published post-1980 has been added except in the postscript (see below). Pagination in the present version does not correspond to the original because of computerised resetting of the text. Footnotes in this version are consecutive throughout, rather than chapter by chapter as required in the 1980 version. The original bound copy is lodged in Edinburgh University Library. A PDF scan of it is available at https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk /bitstream/handle/1842/6840/254333.pdf A further hand-corrected copy is available together with my research archive in the Special Collections Department at St Andrews University Library. http://www.st- andrews.ac.uk/library/specialcollections/ A note for researchers interested in the movement for the reformation of manners 1688-1715 and afterwards has been added as a postscript which lists other studies which have utilised this work and its sources in various ways. I am grateful to the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotland for its generous scholarship support while a research student at Edinburgh University undertaking this study in the 1970s and to the following for their encouragement, guidance and support during the creation and completion of this research.
  • Chen2019.Pdf (1.576Mb)

    Chen2019.Pdf (1.576Mb)

    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Daniel Defoe’s Moral and Political Thought in Its Religious Context Chienyuen Chen PhD Thesis The University of Edinburgh 2019 2 Abstract This thesis aims to provide a comprehensive picture of the religious ideas of the famous English journalist and novelist Daniel Defoe. Today, Defoe is best remembered as a novelist, but most of his works are non-fictional works including a sizable number of didactic or supernatural writings. Even though there is a rising scholarly interest in Defoe’s thoughts on subjects such as politics or Puritanism, there is hardly a single monograph devoted to Defoe’s religious ideas. This thesis aims to fill the gap by examining Defoe’s works throughout his career. It demonstrates that Defoe’s Presbyterian upbringing was influential in his emphasis on the ideas of good work, practical godliness, and the development of good habits.
  • History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning

    History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning

    History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning History, Medicine, and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning • • nancy g. siraisi the university of michigan press • ann arbor Copyright © by the University of Michigan 2007 All rights reserved Published in the United States of America by The University of Michigan Press Manufactured in the United States of America c Printed on acid-free paper 2010 2009 2008 2007 4 3 2 1 No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, or otherwise, without the written permission of the publisher. A CIP catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Siraisi, Nancy G. History, medicine, and the traditions of Renaissance learning / Nancy G. Siraisi. p. cm. — (Cultures of knowledge in the early modern world) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-472-11602-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-472-11602-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Medicine—History—16th century. 2. Renaissance. I. Title. R146.S57 2008 610.9—dc22 2007010656 ISBN13 978-0-472-02548-0 (electronic) For nobuyuki siraisi PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his book is a study of connections, parallels, and mutual interaction T between two in›uential disciplines, medicine and history, in ‹fteenth- to seventeenth-century Europe. The elevation of history in status and signi‹- cance, the expansion of the scope and methods of history, and the related (but distinct) growth of antiquarianism are among the most striking—and recently among the best studied—features of the humanist culture of that period.
  • I~Ist of Bishops of Carlisle. List of Priors of Carlisle

    I~Ist of Bishops of Carlisle. List of Priors of Carlisle

    DIOCESE OF CARLISLE. tos seen in the following numerical list, with the years hi which they were respectively inducted : • · I~IST OF BISHOPS OF CARLISLE. 1 .tEthelwald, • •• .... ·1133 19 Mannaduke Lumley 1429 38 Richard Senhonse •. 1624 2 Bemard, ......... -1157 20 Nicholas Close .... 1449 39 Frands White ...... ]626 Vacant 30 years. 21. William Percy • · · · l·M2 40 Bamaby Potter • .•. 1628 3 Hugh, . ···········1216 22 John Kingscott ····1462 41 James Usher ....•• 1641 4 Waiter, .••. • ..•••• -1223 23 Richard Scroop •• • ·1463 Vacant 6 Yt!ars. .5 SylvesterdeEverdon1246 24 Edward Storey ····1468 42 Richard Steme .... J661 6 Thos. de Vetriponte 1255 25 Richard Bell •••.. ·1478 43 Edward Rainbow .. )664 7 Robt. de Chauncey 1258 26 William Sever ••• ·1496 44 Thomas Smith .... 1684 8 Ra1ph Irton •.. •. ·1280 27 Roger Leyburn .... 1503 45 William Nicholson 1702 9 John Halton · .... -1292 28 John Penny.·· ..... }508 46 Samuel Bradford , .. 1718· 10 John Ross ..... ·····1325 29 John Kyte ... ·····1520 47 John Waugh ...... 1723 H John Kirkby .... ·1332 30 Robert Aldridge .... l537 48 George Fleming. •· ·1734 12 Gilbert Welton ••• ·1352 31 Owen Oglethorp .•. ·1556 49 Richard Osbaldiston 1747 13 Thomas Appleby · ·1363 1 32 John Best.····.· .. -1560 50 Charles Lyttleton • ·1762 14 Robert Reed · • • · • ·1396 1 33 Richard Bames • • · ·1570 51 Edmund Law .....1768 15 Thomas Merks .... 13!17 i 34 John Meye ........ 1577 52 John Douglas ..... ·1787 16 Wm. Strickland ... -1400 I 35 Henry Robinson .... J598 53 E. V. Vemon ..... ·1791 17 Roger Wht;lpdale • -1419 36 Robert Snowden. • · ·1616 I 54 Samuel Goodenough 1807 18 Wm. Barrow ..... ·1423 37 Richard Mill>urne .. 1621 55 Hon. H. Percy ••• ·1827 • • LIST OF PRIORS OF CARLISLE .
  • Renaissance and Reformation, 1993

    Renaissance and Reformation, 1993

    ^ Unica Oblatio Christi: Eucharistie Sacrifice and the first Zurich Disputation KEITH D. LEWIS S ummary: The First Zurich Disputation (January 29th, 1523) between Ulrich Zwingli and Johann Faber was the earliest Reformation-era public debate of the doctrine of the eucharistie sacrifice. While Zwingli was at an early and relatively fluid stage in his rejection of eucharistie sacrifice, Faber's defense employed not only traditional scholastic sources but other authoritative supports previously unused in the defense of doctrine. Never- theless, the polemical atmosphere of the exchange between the two both during and after the disputation precluded true clarity andpotential common ground on this issue. For ten long years, our opponents have written many books asserting that the mass is a sacrifice, and yet not one of them has defined what sacrifice is or is not [Philip Melanchthon, Apologia Confessionis XXIV, XII, 15 (1531)]. The fact that Swiss reformer Ulrich Zwingli rejected any notion of eucharistie sacrifice and insisted on a strictly anamnetic eucharist early-on in his emer- gence as a reformer, is well-known. Yet for all that has been written concerning Zwingli' s eucharistie theology,^ surprisingly little attention has been paid to the actual circumstances of his initial rejection of the doctrine of eucharistie sacrifice in the theological context of the First Zurich Disputation of January 29th, 1523, during which the vicar-general of the diocese of Constance Johann Faber ( 1478-1541) emerged as an impromptu and reluctant debating opponent to ZwingH, with whom Faber had been on friendly terms. This is especially surprising, when one considers that the Zurich meeting appears to have been the first public debate in the sixteenth century between a controversial theologian and a major reformation personality concerning the doctrine of eucharistie sacrifice.
  • The Descendants of Job Atterbury

    The Descendants of Job Atterbury

    THE DESCENDANTS OF JOB ATTERBURY BY L. EFFINGHAM de FOREST, M.A., J.D., F.S.G., F.I.A.G. AND ANNE LAWRENCE de FOREST THE DE FOREST PUBLISHING COMPANY NEw YoRic, N. Y. 1933 CoPnIG:e:T, 1933, BY L. EFl"IHGBAK J>E FOllEST This work is not to be reproduced in whole or in part without permission in writing from the authors. REARRANGED AND REPRINTED FROM: ATTERBURY AND ALLIED F AKILIES (1933) BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST As AUTHOR: Dommerich, Hall and Allied Families (1924). Ballard and Allied Families (1924). The Tercentenary of New York (1924). Ludington-Saltus Records (1925). Babcock and Allied Families (1928). The Van Cortlandt Family (1930). Our Colonial and Continental Ancestors ( 1930). Jelke and Frazier and Allied Families (1931). As EDITOR: Year Books of the (N. Y.) Society of Colonial Wars (1914-191S, 1915-1916, 1920-1921). Genealogical Records of the Saint Nicholas Society (1916, 1923). Year Book of the (N. Y.) Society of American Wars (1917). Record Books of the (N. Y.) Society of Mayflower Descendants (1922, 1926). History of the Class of 1912, Yale College, Volume II (1924). The Journals and Papers of Seth Pomeroy (1926). Worthington-Rice and Allied Families (1929). American Colonial Families (1930). Elliott and Gibbons and Allied Families (1931). The Sherrill Genealogy (2nd edition, 1932). Louisbourg Journals, 1745 (1932). BY L. EFFINGHAM DE FOREST AND ANNE LAWRENCE DE FOREST James Cox Brady and his Ancestry (1933). Atterbury and Allied Families ( 1933) . Captain John Underhill (1933). The Descendants of Job Atterbury ( 1933). FOREWORD THIS genealogy was compiled for Mrs.
  • April 2007 Newsletter

    April 2007 Newsletter

    historians of netherlandish art NEWSLETTER AND REVIEW OF BOOKS Dedicated to the Study of Netherlandish, German and Franco-Flemish Art and Architecture, 1350-1750 Vol. 24, No. 1 www.hnanews.org April 2007 Have a Drink at the Airport! Jan Pieter van Baurscheit (1669–1728), Fellow Drinkers, c. 1700. Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam. Exhibited Schiphol Airport, March 1–June 5, 2007 HNA Newsletter, Vol. 23, No. 2, November 2006 1 historians of netherlandish art 23 S. Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park NJ 08904 Telephone/Fax: (732) 937-8394 E-Mail: [email protected] www.hnanews.org Historians of Netherlandish Art Officers President - Wayne Franits Professor of Fine Arts Syracuse University Syracuse NY 13244-1200 Vice President - Stephanie Dickey Bader Chair in Northern Baroque Art Queen’s University Kingston ON K7L 3N6 Canada Treasurer - Leopoldine Prosperetti Johns Hopkins University North Charles Street Baltimore MD 21218 European Treasurer and Liaison - Fiona Healy Marc-Chagall-Str. 68 D-55127 Mainz Germany Board Members Contents Ann Jensen Adams Krista De Jonge HNA News .............................................................................. 1 Christine Göttler Personalia ................................................................................ 2 Julie Hochstrasser Exhibitions ............................................................................... 2 Alison Kettering Ron Spronk Museum News ......................................................................... 5 Marjorie E. Wieseman Scholarly Activities Conferences: To Attend ..........................................................
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    The Battle of the Books Textual Introduction The fortunes of The Battle of the Books are securely linked to those of A Tale of a Tub, notwithstanding the fact that both are independent works in origin and conception.1 Appearing on 10 May 1704 within the same covers,2 they shared the full title page, as they had already done in the pre-publication newspaper advertisement of the day before;3 all factors that have established a dependent status for The Battle of the Books that has endured. Of course, this relationship does not rule out that the Battle continues the Tale’s metaphors and motifs, its themes and issues, its textual strategies and modes of narration.4 Early during his sojourn at Moor Park, Swift had, in his own hand, prepared for the press Sir William Temple’s second octavo collection of essays, Miscellanea: The Second Part (1690), and a decade later its posthumous continuation, Miscellanea: The Third Part (1701), a book of 368 octavo pages.5 To make a comparable debut on his own account in the same format, he added a substantial makeweight to the completed Tale of a Tub, “a very considerable Addition to the Bulk of the Volume, a Circumstance by no means to be neglected by a skilful Writer,” as he called it (p. □□). In round figures, he lengthened his book by half as much again in 1 We endorse the position taken by Phillip Harth, Swift and Anglican Rationalism: The Religious Background of “A Tale of a Tub” (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1961), pp.
  • Archaeological Journal the Palace Or Manor-House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with Some Notes on Their Early Re

    Archaeological Journal the Palace Or Manor-House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with Some Notes on Their Early Re

    This article was downloaded by: [Northwestern University] On: 03 February 2015, At: 23:25 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Archaeological Journal Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raij20 The Palace or Manor-House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with some Notes on their Early Residences Philip Norman LL.D., F.S.A. Published online: 17 Jul 2014. To cite this article: Philip Norman LL.D., F.S.A. (1920) The Palace or Manor- House of the Bishops of Rochester at Bromley, Kent, with some Notes on their Early Residences, Archaeological Journal, 77:1, 148-176, DOI: 10.1080/00665983.1920.10853350 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00665983.1920.10853350 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
  • The BBLHS Companion to Horsburgh's Bromley

    The BBLHS Companion to Horsburgh's Bromley

    The BBLHS Companion to Horsburgh’s Bromley Being a transcription of notes added by William Baxter to Bromley From the earliest timest to the present century by E.L.S. Horsburgh published in 1929 with copies of the added pictures and drawings together with some additional information and explanation. ©Bromley Borough Local History Society 2017 Horsburgh’s Bromley Companion Introduction When Edward Horsburgh completed Bromley from the earliest times to the present century in 1929, it represented the culmination of many years work by a number of people. It was also rather late, having been intended to record the town’s history up to around 1900 and be published soon after! However, apart from the delay caused by the Great War, it is perhaps not surprising that being the result of work by a committee of local worthies, agreement on what should be included or excluded caused some dissension. Without the modern benefits of word processing, it was also more difficult to review and amend any text and it appears that the decision to publish was to an extent one of “now or never”. Following publication, one committee member at least, William Baxter, took some exception to the accuracy and range of the contents to the extent that he started making amendments and additions to the published text. These changes grew to such a point that he eventually dismembered a copy of the book, inserted his changes and had it rebound in two volumes. At the end of this Companion will be found a critique of the original book, which is well worth reading, as it points out Baxter’s somewhat ambivalent involvement and the books limitations which, sadly have not yet been rectified, in the topics covered and the way what was done was less than ideal.
  • Die Unterrichtseinheit Zum Film Sus Sek Ii

    Die Unterrichtseinheit Zum Film Sus Sek Ii

    DIE UNTERRICHTSEINHEIT ZUM FILM SUS SEK II Inhaltsverzeichnis 2 Die Unterrichtseinheit Impressum zum Film „Zwingli“ SUS / SEK II INHALTSVERZEICHNIS / IMPRESSUM SET 1 SET 5 Figurengruppe Anna Reinhart und Figurengruppe Christoph Froschauer Katharina von Zimmern 3 und Söldner 43 – – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 4 AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 44 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 5 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 45 AB 3 Steckbrief 7 AB 3 Steckbrief 47 AB 4 Materialset 1: Anna Reinhart und AB 4 Materialset 5: Christoph Froschauer Katharina von Zimmern 8 und Söldner 48 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 10 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 50 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 12 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 52 SET 2 SET 6 Figurengruppe Gerold und Bettlerjunge 13 Zwingli und der Krieg 53 – – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 14 AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 54 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 15 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 55 AB 3 Steckbrief 17 AB 3 Steckbrief 57 AB 4 Materialset 2: Gerold und Bettlerjunge 18 AB 4 Materialset 6: Zwingli und der Krieg 58 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 20 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 60 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 22 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 62 SET 3 Figurengruppe Leo Jud und Felix Manz 23 – AB 1 Auftrag: Figuren-Zeit-Panorama 24 AB 2 Figurenkonstellation und Sequenzen 25 AB 3 Steckbrief 27 AB 4 Materialset 3: Leo Jud und Felix Manz 28 AB 5 Zwingli: Biografie und Ereignisse 30 AB 6 Zeitstrahl 32 IMPRESSUM – AutorInnen: SET 4 Prof. Dr. Karin Fuchs (Dozentin) mit Fabian Blaser und Figurengruppe