Green Parties and Politics in the European Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Green Parties and Politics in the European Union Green Parties and Politics in the European Union The European Union offers both real opportunities and serious strategic dilemmas for green parties. Ecological problems demand transnational solutions and the EU has taken a central role in policy sectors related to the environment. At the same time, the EU’s increasing centralisation, bureaucratisation and prioritisation of economic growth violates deeply held green principles. What then are the strategies left open to green parties operating within the EU? Green Parties and Politics in the European Union explores the transnational goals, strategies and impact of green actors working at the EU level. Beginning with a overview of the development of green politics and actors within the EU, Elizabeth Bomberg argues that the ‘greening’ of European politics and the advancement of European integration are inextricably linked and that the EU presents a strategic dilemma to green parties. In short, how can Greens reconcile their radical, alternative politics with the EU’s incrementalist ethos and traditional practices? This dilemma informs all aspects of the greens’ European policy, their visions of an alternative Europe, their parliamentary and extra-parliamentary strategies, and their impact on European policies and politics. Elizabeth Bomberg draws on extensive research, field work and over 100 interviews with leading green politicians, NGO members, environmental and industrial lobbyists, EU officials and MEPs. It will be essential reading for those studying green politics and those interested in the political workings of the EU. Elizabeth Bomberg is lecturer in Politics at Stirling University, Scotland. European Public Policy Series Edited by Jeremy Richardson Department of Government, University of Essex Also available in the series: European Union Power and policy-making Jeremy Richardson EU social policy in the 1990s Gerda Falkner Democratic Spain Reshaping external relations in a changing world Richard Gillespie, Fernando Rodrigo and Jonathan Story Regulating Europe Giandomenico Majone Policy-making, European integration and the role of interest groups Sonia Mazey and Jeremy Richardson Adjusting to Europe The impact of the European Union on national institutions and policies Yves Meny, Pierre Muller and Jean Louis Quermonne Policy-making in the European Union Conceptual lenses and the integration process Laura Cram Politics of corporate taxation in the EU Knowledge and international policy agendas Claudio M. Radaelli Regions in Europe Patrick Le Gales and Christian LeQuesne European Commission Laura Cram and Jeremy Richardson Remaking social Europe Richard Goma Green Parties and Politics in the European Union Elizabeth Bomberg London and New York First published 1998 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1998 Elizabeth Bomberg The right of Elizabeth Bomberg to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by her in accordance with the copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-203-98222-3 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-10264-2 (hbk) ISBN 0-415-10265-0 (pbk) TO JOHN Contents List of illustrations vii Acknowledgements viii Series editor’s preface x Introduction 1 1 Green politics in Europe 7 2 Green issues and environmental policy-making in 33 the European Union 3 Green visions of Europe 55 4 Green transnational strategies and electoral 77 performance 5 Greens and the European Parliament: an inside 99 look 6 The Greens’ policy influence in the European 123 Union 7 The Greens’ policy-making role: three case studies 147 8 Conclusion 167 Appendix 1: Green parties in the EU: profiles 177 Appendix 2: Key policy-making institutions of the EU 185 Notes 189 Bibliography 201 Index 217 Illustrations Figure 1.1 Green party types 24 Table 1.1 Green actors: goals and strategies 22 Table 4.1 1979 EP election results 81 Table 4.2 1984 EP election results 86 Table 4.3 1989 EP election results 90 Table 4.4 1994 EP election results 93 Table 5.1 GRAEL seats in the EP, 1984 101 Table 5.2 GGEP seats, July 1989 106 Table 5.3 GGEP MEPs, 1994–9 114 Table 6.1 Green Group in the European Parliament seminars 133 Table 7.1 Time line of Packaging Waste Directive 157 Acknowledgements An interesting variety of people and organisations have helped me complete this book. Early research for this project was financed by a grant from the Council of European Studies, the DAAD and the Center for German and European Studies (University of California, Berkeley). Later field work was supported by a grant from the University of Stirling. The Politics Department there deserves special thanks for their patience and support, not least during my periods of leave. The Centre for European Policy Studies in Brussels hosted me in 1995, a post facilitated by an ESRC grant on EU decision-making (R000235829). For critical readings of draft text and editing advice, I wish to thank Steve Breyman (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute); Stan Anderson, Michael Gordon and Peter Merkl (all three at the University of California, Santa Barbara); Neil Carter (University of York); Mary M. McKenzie (University of San Diego); Matt Paterson (University of Keele); Joachim Raschke (Universität Hamburg); and Michael Shackleton (European Parliament). Ralph Monö and the European Federation of Green Parties provided useful electoral data and knowledge. Ricardo Gomez (University of Glasgow) helped enormously with the compilation of data on national green parties (see Appendix I). For their Euro-hospitality and links in Brussels, I wish to thank Richard Doherty and Annette Schulte. Caroline Wintersgill (formerly of Routledge) offered editorial encouragement and understanding. Given this study’s heavy reliance on interviews, I am particularly grateful to all those who agreed to speak with me. All interviews were conducted on a non-attributable basis. My subjects included Commission officials (both in the services and cabinets), members and officials of the European Parliament, national green party members, environmental and industrial lobbyists, German, Belgium and British government officials based in Brussels and in national capitals. A complete list of interviewees and interview notes are on file in the Department of Politics, University of Stirling. I am especially indebted to all members and staff of the Green Group in the European Parliament who took time out to be interviewed. Only two ix Green MEPs declined to be interviewed. Preoccupied with their quest for more openness in the EU, they were perhaps too busy to speak to this researcher. On the other hand, GGEP press attaché Diana Johnstone deserves a particular mention for her assistance. A special thanks to GGEP member Monica Frassoni for being a friend as well as a knowledgeable source. Finally, I wish to thank my family (near and far) who offered unflagging moral support throughout the whole endeavour. My two sons, Miles and Calum, deserve credit for ensuring the book was not rushed or published prematurely. My deepest debt of gratitude is owed to John Peterson at the University of Glasgow. John edited the entire text without once losing his patience or humour. His advice, forbearance and support were far beyond that which I could reasonably expect, even from a husband. This book is dedicated to him. Series editor’s preface The ‘greening’ of politics—electoral politics, public policy-making and even the internal politics of private organisations such as oil companies—is now an established phenomenon of Western European political systems. No Member State in the European Union (or, indeed, those ‘aspirant’ states in the newly democratised nations of Eastern Europe) has been untouched by the political advance of green parties, environmental pressure groups and more loosely organised green social movements. Green interests are easily the most successful of the new wave of non- producer organisations, including women’s and consumer groups, that has impinged increasingly on the processes by which public policy is made—at all levels. At least two important features characterise these new groups and movements. They are often run by quite entrepreneurial individuals who are adept at mobilising public opinion and constructing political agendas. Second, they face an array of opportunity structures—or different policy- making arenas and venues—that they can exploit to considerable policy advantage. However, just as there is no such thing as a free lunch, so there are costs as well as benefits to these new organisations. One of the costs results from the fact that their membership is often fickle. As ‘credit card’ organisations, they have to be very active in the political marketplace in order to retain old members and attract new ones. This may lead them into public marketing strategies that can be inconsistent with their main long-term public policy goals. A second disadvantage is that, in the long run, influencing public policy might well depend on the adoption of a more ‘insider’ based strategy, inconsistent with attracting new supporters in the competitive marketplace for political activism. In the end, they need to sit down with their opponents—especially as those opponents become more sophisticated in responding to the green challenge and as new policy fashions, such as deregulation, privatisation and competitiveness emerge.
Recommended publications
  • Green Parties and Elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Green Par Elections
    Chapter 1 Green Parties and Elections, 1979–2019 Green parties and elections to the European Parliament, 1979–2019 Wolfgang Rüdig Introduction The history of green parties in Europe is closely intertwined with the history of elections to the European Parliament. When the first direct elections to the European Parliament took place in June 1979, the development of green parties in Europe was still in its infancy. Only in Belgium and the UK had green parties been formed that took part in these elections; but ecological lists, which were the pre- decessors of green parties, competed in other countries. Despite not winning representation, the German Greens were particularly influ- enced by the 1979 European elections. Five years later, most partic- ipating countries had seen the formation of national green parties, and the first Green MEPs from Belgium and Germany were elected. Green parties have been represented continuously in the European Parliament since 1984. Subsequent years saw Greens from many other countries joining their Belgian and German colleagues in the Euro- pean Parliament. European elections continued to be important for party formation in new EU member countries. In the 1980s it was the South European countries (Greece, Portugal and Spain), following 4 GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE their successful transition to democracies, that became members. Green parties did not have a strong role in their national party systems, and European elections became an important focus for party develop- ment. In the 1990s it was the turn of Austria, Finland and Sweden to join; green parties were already well established in all three nations and provided ongoing support for Greens in the European Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • 21. 3. Mai 1983: Fraktionssitzung
    DIE GRÜNEN – 10. WP Fraktionssitzung: 3.5.1983 21. 3. Mai 1983: Fraktionssitzung AGG, B.II.1, 5317, 5318, 5321. »Protokoll der Fraktionssitzung vom 03. Mai 1983. Beginn der Sitzung um 09.00 Uhr«. Anwesend: Abgeordnete: Bard, Gert Bastian, Beck-Oberdorf, Burgmann, Drabiniok, Ehmke, Joschka Fischer, Gott- wald, Hecker, Hickel, Hoss, Jannsen, Kelly, Kleinert, Nickels, Potthast, Reents, Sauermilch, Schily, Dirk Schneider, Schoppe, Schwenninger, Stratmann, Verheyen, Vogt, Vollmer. Nachrückerinnen und Nachrücker: Arkenstette, Borgmann, Bueb, Daniels, Dann, Hönes, Horácˇek, Nor- bert Mann, Jo Müller, Rusche, Schierholz, Stefan Schulte, Senfft, Suhr, Tatge, Tischer, Axel Vogel, Marita Wagner, Gerd P. Werner, Helmut Werner, Zeitler. Landesvertreter ohne Mandat: Für das Bundesland Bremen von Gleich, für das Saarland Kunz. Protokoll: [Alleritz.] Tagesordnung: TOP 1: Kenntnisnahmen; Tagesordnung für die 4., 5. und 6. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundes- tages – Anlage – TOP 2: Gremienbesetzung – Anlage – TOP 3: Besetzung der Kommissionen des Ältestenrates – Anlage – TOP 4: Bericht über den Stand der Debattenvorbereitung TOP 5: Verschiedenes – nächste BHA-Sitzung, – Allgemeines zur Information. – Besuch Startbahn West am 07. Mai 82, 12.00 Uhr Hbf. Frankfurt, – Projekt »Zukunftswerkstatt« (Stand der Diskussion), – Nachrücker und soziale Bewegungen, – Fraktionsorganisation. TOP 1 wurde zur Kenntnis genommen. TOP 2 Otto Schily verliest Auszüge der Anlage zu TOP 2 (Gremienbesetzung)1 und bittet um Namens- vorschläge. 1 Die Anlage (vgl. AGG, B.II.1, 3060) enthält eine Übersicht des Allgemeinen Parlamentsdienstes vom 23. März 1983 zu »Gremien, denen Mitglieder angehören, die vom Bundestag bestimmt werden«, mit den jeweiligen gesetzlichen Grundlagen und Besetzungsmodalitäten, den auf die einzelnen Fraktionen in der 9. Wahlperiode entfallenen Sitzen sowie den Verteilungsschlüsseln der Sitze für die 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundestag D Eutscher
    Plenarprotokoll 13/12 eutscher Bundesta g D Stenographischer Bericht 12. Sitzung Bonn, Donnerstag, den 19. Januar 1995 Inhalt: Gedenkworte für die Opfer der Erdbeben- Zusatztagesordnungspunkt 4: katastrophe in Japan 637 A Beratung des Antrags der Fraktion der Nachruf auf das ehemalige Mitglied des SPD: Beendigung des Krieges in Tsche- Deutschen Bundestages Bundesminister a. D. tschenien (Drucksache 13/239) Professor Dr. Karl Schiller 637 B Dr. Klaus Kinkel, Bundesminister AA . 638C, Glückwünsche zu den Geburtstagen der 667D, 669 B Abgeordneten Dr.-Ing. Karl-Hans Laer-- Norbert Gansel SPD 640D mann und Dr. Dietrich Mahlo . 637 D Rudolf Seiters CDU/CSU 643 A Eintritt des Abgeordneten Eike Maria Anna Hovermann in den Deutschen Bundestag 637 D Gerd Poppe BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN 645D Erweiterung der Tagesordnung 637 D Ulrich Irmer F.D.P. 647 B Abwicklung der Tagesordnung 637 D Heinrich Graf von Einsiedel PDS . 649D, 654D Absetzung des Punktes 5 von der Tagesord Dr. Helmut Kohl, Bundeskanzler 651A, 655B, 668C nung 638 A Rudolf Scharping SPD 655 C Tagesordnungspunkt 3: Vereinbarte Debatte zur Lage in Tsche- Joseph Fischer (Frankfurt) BÜNDNIS 90/DIE tschenien GRÜNEN 658C, 667 C in Verbindung mit Karl Lamers CDU/CSU . . 659 D Zusatztagesordnungpunkt 1: Markus Meckel SPD 661 C Abgabe einer Erklärung der Bundesre- Andrea Lederer PDS . 662 D gierung Lage in Tschetschenien Christian Schmidt (Fürth) CDU/CSU . 663 D in Verbindung mit Gert Weisskirchen (Wiesloch) SPD . 666A Zusatztagesordnungspunkt 2: Christian Schmidt (Fürth) CDU/CSU . 666B Beratung des Antrags der PDS: Krieg in Tschetschenien (Drucksache 13/172) Karsten D. Voigt (Frankfurt) SPD . 668A in Verbindung mit Günter Verheugen SPD 668 D Zusatztagesordnungspunkt 3: Tagesordnungspunkt 4: Beratung des Antrags der Fraktionen der CDU/CSU und F.D.P.: Lage in Tsche- Wahlvorschlag für die Wahl der Schrift- tschenien (Drucksache 13/228) führer gemäß § 3 der Geschäftsordnung (Drucksachen 13/234, 13/235, 13/236, in Verbindung mit 13/237, 13/238) .
    [Show full text]
  • Gegen Alle Machtblöcke Die Grünen, Der Ost-West-Konflikt Und Die Deutsche Frage
    PAPERS JOCHEN WEICHOLD GEGEN ALLE MACHTBLÖCKE DIE GRÜNEN, DER OST-WEST-KONFLIKT UND DIE DEUTSCHE FRAGE ROSA LUXEMBURG STIFTUNG IMPRESSUM PAPERS 4/2019 wird herausgegeben von der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung V. i. S. d. P.: Henning Heine Franz-Mehring-Platz 1 · 10243 Berlin · www.rosalux.de ISSN 2194-0916 · Redaktionsschluss: Oktober 2019 Lektorat: TEXT-ARBEIT, Berlin Layout/Herstellung: MediaService GmbH Druck und Kommunikation Jochen Weichold Gegen alle Machtblöcke Die Grünen, der Ost-West-Konflikt und die deutsche Frage 30 Jahre nach dem Beitritt der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR) zur Bundesrepublik Deutschland (BRD) und drei Jahrzehnte nach dem Ende der Blockkonfrontation lohnt es sich, einen Blick zurück auf diese Ereignisse und auf die daran beteiligten politischen Kräfte zu werfen. Im Folgenden soll es um die Partei Die Grünen gehen, die Entwicklung ihrer Positionen zum Ost-West-Konflikt und zur darin eingebetteten deutschen Frage. Dabei ist die Positionierung der Grünen nur adäquat nachzuvollziehen, wenn man das generelle Politikverständnis der Akteure dieser Partei berücksichtigt. «Wir sind weder rechts noch links, sondern vorn!»,1 lautete das Credo, mit dem sich Die Grünen als «Alternative zu den herkömmlichen Parteien»2 Ende der 1970er Jahre präsentierten und sich quer zum bestehenden Parteiensystem in der BRD verorteten. Mit gleicher Radikalität postulierten sie in ihrem Saarbrücker Bundesprogramm von 1980 ihre Gegnerschaft zu den sogenannten Industriegesellschaften in Ost und West: «Sowohl aus der Wettbewerbswirtschaft als auch aus der Konzentration wirtschaftlicher Macht in staats- und privatkapitalistischen Monopolen gehen jene ausbeuterischen Wachstumszwänge hervor, in deren Folge die völlige Verseuchung und Verwüstung der menschlichen Lebensbasis droht.»3 Die Partei machte sich für einen ökologisch-humanistisch-pazifistischen dritten Weg stark.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Access Version Via Utrecht University Repository
    NATIONAL IDENTITY AND COSMOPOLITAN COMMUNITY AMONG DUTCH GREEN PARTY MEMBERS Written by Matthias Schmal and supervised by Luc Lauwers: A thesis part of the Master’s program Cultural Anthropology: Sustainable Citizenship at Utrecht University. August 2017 2 Green Communities National Identity and Cosmopolitan Community Among Dutch Green Party Members A thesis as part of the Master’s program Cultural Anthropology: Sustainable Citizenship at Utrecht University. Written by Matthias Schmal, supervised by Luc Lauwers. Cover by Matthias Schmal. August 4, 2017 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Participant Observation .................................................................................................................... 11 Interviewing ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Online and Media Ethnography ........................................................................................................ 14 A LOST SENSE OF COMMUNITY ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • German Standardization Roadmap on Artificial Intelligence –1 FOREWORD
    DEUTSCHEGERMAN STANDARDIZATION NORMUNGSROADMAP ROADMAP KÜNSTLICHEON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENZ INTELLIGENCE PUBLISHED BY Wolfgang Wahlster Christoph Winterhalter DIN. e. V DKE German Commission for Electrical, Electronic & Information Technologies of DIN and VDE Burggrafenstr. 6 Stresemannallee 15 10787 Berlin 60596 Frankfurt am Main Tel: +49 30 2601-0 Tel: +49 69 6308-0 Email: [email protected] Fax: +49 69 08-9863 Website: www.din.de Email: [email protected] Website: www.dke.de Photo credit: Cover: LightFieldStudios – istockphoto.com Chapter entry pages: kras99 (p. 9, 33), assistant (p. 23), Thitichaya (p. 27), Maxim (p. 35), Shutter2U (p. 61), gunayaliyeva (p. 75), peshkov (p. 91), LuckyStep (p. 111), kaptn (p. 121), ryzhi (p. 129), Alex (p. 135), pickup (p. 143) – stock.adobe.com November 2020 FOREWORD Left: Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster Head of the Steering Group, CEA DFKII FOREWORD Right: Christoph Winterhalter Chairman of the Executive Board, DIN Dear Reader, With the Standardization Roadmap Artificial Intelligence, principles and the three AI application fields of particular Germany is now the first country in the world to present a importance for Germany – industrial automation, mobility/ comprehensive analysis of the current state of and need logistics and medicine. for international standards and specifications for this key technology. In this first edition of the German Standardiza- AI is currently spearheading digitalization, because for the tion Roadmap, not only the technical, but also the ethical first time AI makes it possible to automate numerous cogni- and social aspects of standards in AI are taken into account in tive services that could previously only be provided by human detail in a broad, interdisciplinary approach.
    [Show full text]
  • D. Palos Brent Scowcroft Paolo Pansa Cedronio Simon Serfaty Margaret
    D. Palos Brent Scowcroft Guillermo M. Ungo Heinrich Vogel Vernon A. Wake Paolo Pansa Cedronio Simon Serfaty Brian Urquhart Roland Vogt Jusif Wanandi Margaret Papandreou Olavo Setubal Viron P. Vaky Karsten Voigt Marilyn Waring Eden Pastora Gomez John W. Sewell Jorge Reinaldo Vanossi Berndt von Staden Paul C. Warnke Geoffrey Pattie Safdar Shah Peter Veress Richard von Weizsacker James D. Watkir Mattityahu Peled Israel Shahak Bernard Vernier-Palliez Joris Michael Vos Michael J. Welsl Carlos Andres Perez Jack Shaheen George S. Vest Ian Waddell Curtis White Richard Perle Agha Shahi Jose Luis Villavicencio John Wakeham Robert E. White Ioannis Pesmazoglou Frank Shakespeare Hans-Jochen Vogel Ronald Walters G. William Whii Rinaldo Petrignani Khadri Shamanna Unison Whitem Thomas R. Pickering Nathan Shamuyarira Paul Wilkinson Aquilino Pimentel Jack Shepherd Alan Lee Williai Richard Pipes Marshall Shulman Paul D. Wolfow Gareth Porter Norodom Sihanouk Howard Wolpe Rosario Priore Dimitri Simes Leonard Woodc John Purcell Alan K. Simpson Manfred Worne Percy Qoboza Kenneth Skoug Oliver Wright Anthony C. E. Quainton Michael B. Smith Junya Yano William Quandt Wayne S. Smith Sahabzada Yaqt Janet Mary Youi Ruben Francisco Rabanal Stephen J. Solarz Sinnathamby Rajaratnam Helmut Sonnenfeldt Ruben Ignacio George Rallis Fernand Spaak Robert Zelnick Chai Zemin Detter Graf zu Rantzau James Spain P. V. Narasimha Rao Lothar Spath Peter Raven-Hansen Leonard S. Spector Earl C. Ravenal Dirk Peter Spierenbuq T. Chandrasekhar Reddy Ronald Spiers Jorge Arturo Reina Renato Squillante Elliot L. Richardson Ronald Steel Rozanne L. Ridgway Ulrich Steger John E. Rielly Paula Stern Harry Ristock Dietrich Stobbe Alice Rivlin Walter J. Stoessel,Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Coversheet for Thesis in Sussex Research Online
    A University of Sussex DPhil thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details Party Organisation and Party Adaptation: Western European Communist and Successor Parties Daniel James Keith UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, April, 2010 ii I hereby declare that this thesis has not been and will not be, submitted in whole or in part to another University for the award of any other degree. Signature :……………………………………… iii Acknowledgements My colleagues at the Sussex European Institute (SEI) and the Department of Politics and Contemporary European Studies have contributed a wealth of ideas that contributed to this study of Communist parties in Western Europe. Their support, generosity, assistance and wealth of knowledge about political parties made the SEI a fantastic place to conduct my doctoral research. I would like to thank all those at SEI who have given me so many opportunities and who helped to make this research possible including: Paul Webb, Paul Taggart, Aleks Szczerbiak, Francis McGowan, James Hampshire, Lucia Quaglia, Pontus Odmalm and Sally Marthaler.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 YEARS of EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and Subjugated
    European Parliament – 50th birthday QA-70-07-089-EN-C series 1958–2008 Th ere is hardly a political system in the modern world that does not have a parliamentary assembly in its institutional ‘toolkit’. Even autocratic or totalitarian BUILDING PARLIAMENT: systems have found a way of creating the illusion of popular expression, albeit tamed 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY and subjugated. Th e parliamentary institution is not in itself a suffi cient condition for granting a democratic licence. Yet the existence of a parliament is a necessary condition of what 1958–2008 we have defi ned since the English, American and French Revolutions as ‘democracy’. Since the start of European integration, the history of the European Parliament has fallen between these two extremes. Europe was not initially created with democracy in mind. Yet Europe today is realistic only if it espouses the canons of democracy. In other words, political realism in our era means building a new utopia, that of a supranational or post-national democracy, while for two centuries the DNA of democracy has been its realisation within the nation-state. Yves Mény President of the European University Institute, Florence BUILDING PARLIAMENT: BUILDING 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY PARLIAMENT EUROPEAN OF YEARS 50 ISBN 978-92-823-2368-7 European Parliament – 50th birthday series Price in Luxembourg (excluding VAT): EUR 25 BUILDING PARLIAMENT: 50 YEARS OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT HISTORY 1958–2008 This work was produced by the European University Institute, Florence, under the direction of Yves Mény, for the European Parliament. Contributors: Introduction, Jean-Marie Palayret; Part One, Luciano Bardi, Nabli Beligh, Cristina Sio Lopez and Olivier Costa (coordinator); Part Two, Pierre Roca, Ann Rasmussen and Paolo Ponzano (coordinator); Part Three, Florence Benoît-Rohmer; Conclusions, Yves Mény.
    [Show full text]
  • Angebliche "Gewaltfreiheit" Als Gründungsmythos
    Das ambivalente Angebliche Verhältnis der Grünen „Gewaltfreiheit“ als zur Gewaltfrage Gründungsmythos Stephan Eisel Die Debatte um die militante Vergangen- suchten, dominierte bei der nachfolgen- heit von Außenminister Joschka Fischer den Spontibewegung und den daraus und Umweltminister Jürgen Trittin ist für entstehenden Grünen die Debatte um die die Grünen nicht nur unangenehm, weil Mittel des Protestes und des Widerstan- es dabei um ihre prominentesten Reprä- des gegen demokratische Mehrheitsent- sentanten geht, sie ruft auch in Erinne- scheidungen. rung, wie schwer sich die Grünen seit ih- Die Frage, inwieweit dabei Gewalt zur rer Gründung mit der klaren Ablehnung Erreichung eigener politischer Ziele legi- von Gewalt als Mittel der politischen tim sei, schob sich dabei so sehr in den Auseinandersetzung taten. Dieser Pro- Vordergrund, dass die Grünen sich bei zess ist auch deshalb noch nicht abge- ihrer bundesweiten Gründung 1980 be- schlossen, weil der Generationenwechsel wusst das Etikett „gewaltfrei“ zulegten. in der Führungsetage der Partei noch Der scheinbar klare Begriff sollte von der nicht in Gang gekommen ist. Die Emanzi- tatsächlich diffusen Haltung zur Gewalt- pation von der Gründergeneration der frage ablenken. Noch nie zuvor hatte Grünen steht noch aus. eine demokratische Partei geglaubt, die Noch dominieren an der Spitze der Par- Selbstverständlichkeit der Gewaltableh- tei die Nachkriegskinder Rezzo Schlauch nung so unterstreichen zu müssen. In (Jahrgang 1947), Joschka Fischer (Jahr- Wahrheit spiegelte sich darin das ambi- gang 1948), Jürgen Trittin (Jahrgang 1954) valente Verhältnis der Grünen zum staat- oder Claudia Roth (Jahrgang 1955). Sie lichen Gewaltmonopol, der Kehrseite des waren keine 68er wie zum Beispiel der in der Demokratie unverzichtbaren indi- im Krieg geborene Rudi Dutschke (Jahr- viduellen Gewaltverzichtes.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Groningen Greening the Reds Or Reddening the Greens
    University of Groningen Greening the reds or reddening the greens? Lucardie, A.P.M.; van der Knoop, J.; Schuur, Wijbrandt van; Voerman, Gerrit Published in: Green Politics Three IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 1995 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Lucardie, A. P. M., van der Knoop, J., Schuur, W. V., & Voerman, G. (1995). Greening the reds or reddening the greens? the case of the Green Left in the Netherlands. In W. Rüdig (Ed.), Green Politics Three (pp. 90-111). Edinburgh University Press. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 27-09-2021 Paul Lucardie, Jelle van der Knoop, Wijbrandt van Schuur and Gerrit Voerman, ‘Greening the reds or reddening the greens? : the case of the Green Left in the Netherlands’ in: Green Politics Three, Edinburgh, 1995, 90-111.
    [Show full text]
  • Greens for a Better Europe for a Better Greens
    GREENS A BETTER FOR EUROPE “If we don’t change we will perish. Only the Greens truly recognise this. Strong Green Party voices at every level of government are vital.” – Sir Mark Rylance – While Greens in the UK have always suffered from a grossly unfair electoral system, in the European Union they have been able to flourish as part of a small but effective group of European Greens since their first election in 1999. GREENS Greens have had a significant influence on the policies impacting more than 500 million EU citizens, underlining environmental standards and challenging economic and social orthodoxy. While Greens have often been marginalised by the political and media FOR elites in Britain, across Europe, Greens have been seen as ‘the voice of reason’ and the ‘adults in the room’. A With Brexit threatening our ongoing influence on European policy-making, former and current UK Green MEPs Caroline Lucas, Jean Lambert, Keith Taylor and Molly Scott Cato reflect on their time in Brussels and chart a course for the party’s new relationship with the EU-wide Green movement. BETTER This guide to two decades of UK Green achievements in Europe also brings together analysis from prominent academics, journalists, campaigners and Green MEPs from across the EU. EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE GREENS FOR A BETTER EUROPE TWENTY YEARS OF UK GREEN INFLUENCE IN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, 1999–2019 EDITED BY LIAM WARD WITH JAMES BRADY LONDON PUBLISHING
    [Show full text]