Technion President's Report 2019

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Technion President's Report 2019 TECHNION PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 TECHNION PRESIDENT’S REPORT TECHNION PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 presidentsreport.technion.ac.il www.technion.ac.il Cover: Superconducting Quantum Circuits Lab in the Helen Diller Center for Quantum Science, Matter and Engineering PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 REVIEWING A DECADE OF THE TECHNION ETHOS OF ANTICIPATING THE FUTURE In recent years, a new spirit has pervaded all areas of life, from academia to industry, through to the new technologies on which our lives depend. This is the spirit of innovation. In the 21st century, innovation is Israel, is Technion. As a nexus in the global ecosystem of progress, we are proud to offer the 2019 Technion President’s Report under the banner iTechnion. I #iTechnion From Technion President Prof. Peretz Lavie elcome to the 2019 President’s Re- speech laying out the goals and priorities Strategic Goal: W port, in which we review a decade of for my presidency. This strategic vision Replenishing the Faculty progress and look forward to continu- arose out of an intimate knowledge of In 2009, Technion’s faculty had been ing fruition of the Technion vision. the university since joining the faculty in reduced due to a wave of retiring baby 1975. Prior to my presidency, I was dean boomers. The departure of a large cohort When I received the tremendous honor of of the Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of professors affected the quality of the becoming Technion President ten years of Medicine for six years and Technion education and research. Consequently, ago, I felt that I was handed an enormous Vice President for Resource Development a top priority was to refill the faculty’s responsibility: not only to maintain Tech- and External Relations for seven years. ranks with first-rate young professors. nion’s status as Israel’s first and lead- ing university but to steer it onward and This year’s President’s Report has a dual I was personally involved in recruiting upward to new levels of excellence and role. As always, it relates Technion’s candidates, meeting with the most prom- global standing. The challenges along the development since the last Board of ising men and women in their fields to way were numerous, but now that I am Governors meeting, but this year, we also persuade them to join Technion. The only completing my tenure, I look back at the summarize the progress of the entire last way to replenish the faculty with outstand- last decade with satisfaction. Technion’s decade. It is an opportunity to revisit our ing educators and scientists would be to role at the forefront of science and tech- strategic vision of 2009 and compare it provide up-and-coming stars with cut- nology is indisputable, both in Israel and to what actually unfolded. ting-edge laboratory facilities on a par around the world. with those at top universities around the At the time, I divided my strategic vision world. Consequently, during my tenure When I became President, the global fi- into fields which I deemed critical to the dozens of state-of-the-art labs were built nancial crisis of 2008 was fresh and Israeli university’s development: recruiting new and renovated throughout the campus higher education was in an existential crisis, faculty, improving the student experience, in order to accommodate incoming new caused by the proliferation of new private advancing the level of research conducted faculty – most of whom were moving back colleges and by the diminished status of on campus, developing the campus, and to Israel after spending years at the finest academia within Israeli society in general. strengthening Technion’s global role. institutions in the world. A large share of the campus development budget was At the beginning of my tenure, I presented allocated to these projects every year. a vision to the academic assembly in a PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 3 Orientation day for new faculty, 2018 Approximately half of Technion’s current other important steps. The Students As- All these efforts have begun to bear fruit, faculty was hired in the past ten years. See sociation has been involved in the ongoing and we have made a quantum leap in page 6 to meet some of these impressive efforts to improve the student experience recent years. Technion has now been young professors. at the university. voted the top Israeli university for student satisfaction for three consecutive years! Strategic Goal: The Technion Center for Promotion of Upgrading the Student Experience Learning and Teaching continues to play a Strategic Goal: It is a delight to be part of the heightened key role in upgrading the quality of teach- Advancing Basic and spirit on campus. Over the past decade, ing, which is a critical factor for improving Applied Research the overall student experience at Technion student satisfaction. Intensive efforts are A fundamental part of the Technion found- has changed dramatically. Despite being being made to introduce more dynamic ing vision is to empower Technion’s position a first-rate teaching university, many as- and flexible learning environments, as at the front line of scientific and technologi- pects of student life were not optimal ten well as innovative, non-traditional forms cal research and development. In joining years ago, and this meant that a growing of learning suitable to the 21st century, the ranks of the world’s leading scientific number of excellent potential students such as MOOCs, flipped classrooms and and technological research universities, were choosing to study elsewhere. We video lectures. (See page 12) Technion is of service to the State of Israel made it a top priority to empower a nur- and to all of humanity. In addition to hiring turing and inspiring educational environ- Another initiative with a significant im- top researchers to join our faculty, the fund- ment in which each and every student pact on teaching quality is the Yanai Prize ing of research labs and equipment has can flourish. for Excellence in Academic Education. increased by 93 percent. Moreover, we have Launched in 2011, the Yanai Prize recog- dedicated a great deal of energy to rais- A committee headed by Prof. Yachin nizes faculty members who set an exam- ing funds for research. During my tenure, Cohen was tasked with examining the ple through their valuable contributions sponsored research from external sources student workload, and its findings led to to teaching, and who strive to improve has grown by 50 percent, from $61.7 million important changes implemented as of student involvement which enhances the in 2009 to $92.8 million in 2018. 2013. These included shortening the se- sense of belonging. The prize is consid- mesters and the exam periods, as well as ered prestigious and provides an incentive We have also encouraged collaboration coordinating and balancing the workloads to improve classroom performance and between Technion scientists and industry. of students in different faculties, among interaction with students. (See page 14) The new Center for Machine Learning Construction of the new Susan and David Wilstein Gate Solar panels atop the Sara and Moshe Zisapel Nanoelectronics Center and Intelligent Systems that was re- aged tissue, revolutionize information During the last ten years, three new build- cently inaugurated, in partnership with processing and predict the effectiveness ings have been inaugurated: the Emerson Intel Corporation, is just one example of antibiotic cocktails, among many other Family Life Sciences Building, the D. Dan of a 21st century Technion platform that exciting advances. (See page 16) and Betty Kahn Mechanical Engineering facilitates cooperation between Technion Building and the David and Janet Polak faculties and high-tech companies, both Thanks to the hard work of T3, the Tech- Visitors Center. During this period, many Israeli and multinational. (See page 20) nion Technology Transfer Unit, optimal older buildings underwent significant alliances are being forged between sci- renovations, and labs were added and Another focus has been to increase global entists, industry and investors in order to upgraded on a massive scale throughout collaboration. Technion has academic bring Technion innovations to the mar- the campus. collaboration agreements with 213 uni- ketplace. The new DRIVE accelerator pro- versities in 41 different countries, and has gram for entrepreneurs who are part of The Technion is giving a whole new kind submitted 15 cooperation projects within the Technion community and whose start- of welcome to visitors. All entrances to the Erasmus+ program to strengthen ups are in the pre-seed or seed stages Technion City have been upgraded and the cooperation with European universities. is also showing impressive results after new main gates and approach roads are (See page 36) only 2.5 years. (See page 35) designed to ease traffic. Other large-scale ongoing projects included accessibility, Technion frequently makes headlines Strategic Goal: and the upgrading of basic infrastructure thanks to the numerous, highly impres- Campus Development such as air-conditioning and water-saving sive breakthroughs emanating from its We have invested heavily in state-of-the- systems, and improving campus safety. labs. It is heart-warming that many of art facilities and increased accommodation these groundbreaking discoveries are units on campus. Our priority has been to In addition, nearly 1,000 new dorm improving the world and benefitting hu- develop our beautiful campus on Mount beds have been added thanks to sev- manity. Just this past year, the work of Carmel to ensure that it keeps pace with eral major projects: the construction of our scientists is expected to improve the the university’s growing needs. the Stanley Shalom Zielony Graduate quality of brain scans, regenerate dam- Student Village, the new undergraduate PRESIDENT’S REPORT 2019 5 Rededication of the Rosen Solid State Research Building Technion’s campus at CornellTech in New York City student village, and substantial renova- student exchange programs has risen opened in 2017; and the Joan and Irwin tions of the Canada Dormitory Village sharply.
Recommended publications
  • Neal Notes - Home
    WEBINARS WHITEPAPERS SOLUTION CENTERS JOBS BOARD WHAT'S NEW EDUCATION NEWS MAGAZINES JOURNALS CONFERENCES SUBMISSIONS ABOUT HOME CLOUD BIG DATA MOBILE NETWORKING SECURITY SOFTWARE INSIGHTSINSIGHTS HOT TOPICS Neal Notes - Home Latest Posts Israeli Semiconductor Industry Continues to Thrive, but Some Clouds May Be on Horizon Neal Leavitt MAY 30, 2014 14:58 PM A- A A+ Back in 1974, Dov Frohman, one of Intel’s first employees and the inventor of EPROM, erasable programmable read only memory, decided to leave Silicon Valley and return to Israel, his adopted home since 1949. Frohman was charged with helping Intel establish a small chip design center in Haifa, which at the time, was Intel’s first outside the U.S. The rest, as the cliché goes, is history. In a little over a generation, the Israeli semiconductor industry has grown to now employ more than 20,000; annual revenues are about US $5 billion. Intel, for instance, now has about 9,900 employees in Israel and is planning to invest almost $6 billion in upgrading its Kiryat Gat fab facility. In fact, since 1974, Intel has invested about $10.8 billion in the Israeli semiconductor industry. “We’ve exported goods worth $35 billion most from our production centers in Kiryat Gat and Jerusalem,” said Intel VP and Intel Israel CEO Maxine Fassberg. Sol Gradman is editor of TapeOut, a publication covering the semiconductor industry, and also chairs ChipEx, the country’s largest annual semiconductor/microelectronics conference. Gradman said Israel’s semiconductor industry today comprises three types of companies – fabless, multinational design centers, and fabs.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
    hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W
    Claude Elwood Shannon (1916–2001) Solomon W. Golomb, Elwyn Berlekamp, Thomas M. Cover, Robert G. Gallager, James L. Massey, and Andrew J. Viterbi Solomon W. Golomb Done in complete isolation from the community of population geneticists, this work went unpublished While his incredibly inventive mind enriched until it appeared in 1993 in Shannon’s Collected many fields, Claude Shannon’s enduring fame will Papers [5], by which time its results were known surely rest on his 1948 work “A mathematical independently and genetics had become a very theory of communication” [7] and the ongoing rev- different subject. After his Ph.D. thesis Shannon olution in information technology it engendered. wrote nothing further about genetics, and he Shannon, born April 30, 1916, in Petoskey, Michi- expressed skepticism about attempts to expand gan, obtained bachelor’s degrees in both mathe- the domain of information theory beyond the matics and electrical engineering at the University communications area for which he created it. of Michigan in 1936. He then went to M.I.T., and Starting in 1938 Shannon worked at M.I.T. with after spending the summer of 1937 at Bell Tele- Vannevar Bush’s “differential analyzer”, the an- phone Laboratories, he wrote one of the greatest cestral analog computer. After another summer master’s theses ever, published in 1938 as “A sym- (1940) at Bell Labs, he spent the academic year bolic analysis of relay and switching circuits” [8], 1940–41 working under the famous mathemati- in which he showed that the symbolic logic of cian Hermann Weyl at the Institute for Advanced George Boole’s nineteenth century Laws of Thought Study in Princeton, where he also began thinking provided the perfect mathematical model for about recasting communications on a proper switching theory (and indeed for the subsequent mathematical foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Marconi Society - Wikipedia
    9/23/2019 Marconi Society - Wikipedia Marconi Society The Guglielmo Marconi International Fellowship Foundation, briefly called Marconi Foundation and currently known as The Marconi Society, was established by Gioia Marconi Braga in 1974[1] to commemorate the centennial of the birth (April 24, 1874) of her father Guglielmo Marconi. The Marconi International Fellowship Council was established to honor significant contributions in science and technology, awarding the Marconi Prize and an annual $100,000 grant to a living scientist who has made advances in communication technology that benefits mankind. The Marconi Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe. Since 2008, Marconi has also issued the Paul Baran Marconi Society Young Scholar Awards.
    [Show full text]
  • Award Recipients with Citations
    IEEE JACK A. MORTON AWARD RECIPIENTS Beginning with the year 2000 presentation, the Jack A. Morton Award will be renamed the IEEE Andrew S. Grove Award. 1999 - CHARLES H. HENRY "For fundamental contributions to the Lucent Technologies, Bell Laboratories understanding of the optical properties of Murray Hill, NJ quantum wells and semiconductor lasers." 1998 - ISAMU AKASAKI “For contributions in the field of Meijo University group-III nitride materials and devices.” Nagoya, Japan and SHUJI NAKAMURA Nichia Chemical Industries, Ltd. Tokushima, Japan 1997 - CHENMING HU "For outstanding contributions to the physics and University of California modeling of MOS device reliability." Berkeley, CA 1996 - ROBERT W. DUTTON "For seminal contributions to semiconductor Stanford University process and device modeling." Stanford, CA 1995 - YOSHIO NISHI "For contributions to the basic understanding and Hewlett-Packard Company innovative development of MOS device Palo Alto, CA technology." 1994 - ROBERT E. KERWIN "For pioneering work and the basic patent on the AT&T self-aligned silicon-gate process, a key element Warren, NJ in fabrication of very large scale integrated and DONALD L. KLEIN circuits." IBM Corporation Hopewell Junction, NY and JOHN C. SARACE Rockwell International Anaheim, CA 1993 - TOSHIHISA TSUKADA "For contributions to the discovery and Hitachi, Ltd. development of Buried Heterostructure (BH) Tokyo, Japan semiconductor lasers." 1992 - TAKUO SUGANO "For contributions to Metal-Insulator- University of Tokyo Semiconductor Devices and Technology." Tokyo, Japan 1991 - TAK H. NING "For contributions to the development of HWA N. YU advanced bipolar and MOS devices." IBM Corporation Yorktown Height, NY 1 of 3 IEEE JACK A. MORTON AWARD RECIPIENTS Beginning with the year 2000 presentation, the Jack A.
    [Show full text]
  • Doktori (Phd) Értekezés
    NEMZETI KÖZSZOLGÁLATI EGYETEM Hadtudományi Doktori Iskola Doktori (PhD) értekezés Kis J. Ervin Budapest, 2017. NEMZETI KÖZSZOLGÁLATI EGYETEM Hadtudományi Doktori Iskola Kis J. Ervin A LÉGVÉDELMI ÉS LÉGIERŐK EVOLÚCIÓJA, HELYE, SZEREPE, AZ ARAB-IZRAELI 1967-ES, 1973-AS és 1982- ES HÁBORÚK SORÁN, VALAMINT AZ IZRAELI LÉGIERŐ HAMÁSZ ÉS A HEZBOLLAH ELLENI HÁBORÚS ALKALMAZÁSÁNAK TAPASZTALATAI Doktori (PhD) értekezés Témavezető: Dr. habil. Jobbágy Zoltán ezredes, (Ph.D.) egyetemi docens Budapest, 2017 2 TARTALOMJEGYZÉK I. BEVEZETÉS ....................................................................................................................... 5 I.1. A kutatási témaválasztás indoklás ..................................................................................... 9 I.2 A kutatási téma feldolgozásának és aktualitásának indoklása ........................................ 9 I.3 A tudományos probléma megfogalmazása ................................................................... 12 I.4 Hipotézisek ..... .................................................................................................................... 14 I.5 Kutatási célok...................................................................................................................... 14 I.6 Alkalmazott kutatási módszerek ...................................................................................... 20 I.7. A témával foglalkozó szakirodalom áttekintése.................................................. .............21 I.8 Az értekezés felépítése .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members
    7INTERs3PRING 4HE'3!2EPORTER winter s spring 2012 New Executive GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members Director Now on Board The Genetics Society of America New Members of the GSA Board of welcomes four new members elected Directors Adam P. Fagen, by the general membership to the Ph.D., stepped in as 2012 GSA Board of Directors. The VICE PRESIDENT: GSA’s new Executive new members are: Michael Lynch Michael Lynch, Director beginning (Indiana University), who serves as Distinguished December 1, 2011. vice president in 2012 and as GSA Professor of Dr. Fagen previously president in 2013 and Marnie E. Biology, Class of was at the American Halpern (Carnegie Institution for 1954 Professor, Society of Plant Science); Mohamed Noor (Duke Department of Biologists (ASPB), University); and John Schimenti Biology, Indiana where he was the director of public (Cornell University), who will serve as University, continued on page nineteen directors. Bloomington. Dr. Lynch is a population and evolutionary biologist and a In addition to these elected officers, long-time member of GSA. Dr. Lynch 2012 Brenda J. Andrews (University of sees GSA as the home for geneticists Toronto), Editor-in-Chief of GSA’s who study a broad base of topics GSA Award journal, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, and organisms, and as a forum Recipients which was first published online in where general discussion occurs, June 2011, becomes a member of the whether based on the principles Announced Board of Directors. The bylaws have of genetics, the most pressing historically included the GENETICS GSA is pleased to announce the issues within the discipline itself, or editor-in-chief on the Board and as a responses to societal concerns and/ 2012 recipients of its five awards result of a 2011 bylaw revision, the G3 for distinguished service in the or conflicts within applied genetics.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMAN GENE MAPPING WORKSHOPS C.1973–C.1991
    HUMAN GENE MAPPING WORKSHOPS c.1973–c.1991 The transcript of a Witness Seminar held by the History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group, Queen Mary University of London, on 25 March 2014 Edited by E M Jones and E M Tansey Volume 54 2015 ©The Trustee of the Wellcome Trust, London, 2015 First published by Queen Mary University of London, 2015 The History of Modern Biomedicine Research Group is funded by the Wellcome Trust, which is a registered charity, no. 210183. ISBN 978 1 91019 5031 All volumes are freely available online at www.histmodbiomed.org Please cite as: Jones E M, Tansey E M. (eds) (2015) Human Gene Mapping Workshops c.1973–c.1991. Wellcome Witnesses to Contemporary Medicine, vol. 54. London: Queen Mary University of London. CONTENTS What is a Witness Seminar? v Acknowledgements E M Tansey and E M Jones vii Illustrations and credits ix Abbreviations and ancillary guides xi Introduction Professor Peter Goodfellow xiii Transcript Edited by E M Jones and E M Tansey 1 Appendix 1 Photographs of participants at HGM1, Yale; ‘New Haven Conference 1973: First International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping’ 90 Appendix 2 Photograph of (EMBO) workshop on ‘Cell Hybridization and Somatic Cell Genetics’, 1973 96 Biographical notes 99 References 109 Index 129 Witness Seminars: Meetings and publications 141 WHAT IS A WITNESS SEMINAR? The Witness Seminar is a specialized form of oral history, where several individuals associated with a particular set of circumstances or events are invited to meet together to discuss, debate, and agree or disagree about their memories. The meeting is recorded, transcribed, and edited for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Visiting Caltech's Giant Sequoias
    California Institute of Technology Volume 25, No.2 April 1991 Not many people know that the three largest trees in Caltech 's acreage tn the Neider Grove are named for Millikan, Hale, and Noyes. One of the giant .equola.ln Caltech'. acreage rI.e. toward the .ky. Visiting Caltech's giant sequoias by Ted Combs, BS '27 Not many people-not even Cal tech his pracrice rhere, and married a Miss forest containing more than 100 giant oldtimers-know that the Institute owns Clara Fowler. Clara's farher was a suc­ sequoias. an acreage of giant sequoias in the cessful lumberman, a holder of mineral Fortunately for Caltech, soon after remote Nelder Grove area JUSt south of rights, and vice president of his Fleming arrived in Pasadena, he was the Yosemite National Park boundary. brorher-in-Iaw's business. The brorher­ induced by President Edwards of Although some of the trees date back ro in-law was Cyrus McCormick. Throop Polytechnic Institute ro help before the birth of Christ, Caltech's Before long, Arthur also became support the school. In fact, he became chapter in the hisrory of the ttees begins involved in his father-in-Iaw's lumber its principal benefactor. In 1903, he in 1922. It begins, actually, with business. In 1896, in a move related to was elected to the board of trustees. In Arthur H. Fleming, wealthy Pasadenan Clara's healrh, rhe Flemings came ro 1910 he became the board vice and benefacror of Throop Polytechnic Pasadena, and Arthur's lumber interesrs president, and in 1917, board president.
    [Show full text]
  • Commencement 1941-1960
    THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY • JUNE 10, 1958 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from LYRASIS Members and Sloan Foundation http://archive.org/details/commence58john THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY BALTIMORE, MARYLAND Conferring of Degrees at the close of the eighty-second academic year JUNE 10, 1958 Wyman Quadrangle ORDER OF EVENTS Milton Stover Eisenhower, President of the University, presiding PROCESSIONAL THE HOST OF YOUTH — GUENTZEL The United States Army Band of Washington, D. C. Major Hugh Curry, Director * INVOCATION The Reverend Paul C. Warren * WELCOME The President of the University * CONFERRING OF DEGREES ON CANDIDATES Presented by Dean Richard T. Cox: BACHELORS OF ARTS Presented by Dean Robert H. Roy: BACHELORS OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING • DOCTORS OF ENGINEERING Presented by Dean Richard A. Mumma: BACHELORS OF SCIENCE • BACHELORS OF SCIENCE IN NURSING BACHELORS OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING MASTERS OF SCIENCE • MASTERS OF EDUCATION CERTIFICATES OF ADVANCED STUDY IN EDUCATION Presented by Dean Ernest L. Stebbins: MASTERS OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE • DOCTORS OF SCIENCE IN HYGIENE MASTERS OF PUBLIC HEALTH • DOCTORS OF PUBLIC HEALTH Presented by Dean Thomas B. Turner: DOCTORS OF MEDICINE Presented by Dean Philip W. Thayer: MASTERS OF ARTS, SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES DOCTORS OF PHILOSOPHY, SCHOOL OF ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL STUDIES Presented by Professor G. Heberton Evans, Ir.: MASTERS OF ARTS IN TEACHING MASTERS OF ARTS • DOCTORS OF PHILOSOPHY ORDER OF EVENTS Continued MUSICAL INTERLUDE The United States Army Band of Washington, D. C. * CHARGE TO GRADUATES The President of the University * CONFERRING OF HONORARY DEGREES The Prime Minister of Great Britain, THE RIGHT HONORABLE HAROLD MACMILLAN Presented by Professor Carl B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Struggle Against Hamas
    Università degli Studi “Roma Tre” Scuola Dottorale in Scienze Politiche XXV Ciclo Israel’s Struggle Against Hamas Supervisore Dottorando Prof. Leopoldo Nuti Niccolò Petrelli Coordinatore della Sezione Prof. Leopoldo Nuti Introduction The PhD research, ‘Israel’s Struggle against Hamas: Strategic Culture, Adaptation and War’, studies the impact of cultural factors on the Israeli counter-insurgency vis-à-vis Hamas in the period comprised between 1987 and 2005, analyzing to what extent the peculiar traits of the Israeli approach to security and military affairs account for the shaping of a distinct ‘way of war’ and for the successes and failures of the Jewish state in countering the Islamic Resistance Movement’s insurgency. The concept of ‘counter-insurgency’ is logically contingent on that of ‘insurgency’, to which it applies. Being insurgency a protracted struggle to control a contested political space conducted by one or more popularly based non-state challengers1, ‘counter-insurgency’ could be defined as all those measures through which elements of national power are applied for the purpose of suppressing an insurgency. From this definition it appears clear how the concept constitutes an analytical paradigm through which scholars and practitioners approach asymmetric warfare (or war against ‘irregulars’, ‘partisans’ or ‘guerrillas’), that is struggles between non-state and state actors.2 Although old as human civilization, asymmetric warfare rose to prominence after 1945, coming to represent the norm, rather than the exception, of war.3 The end of the Cold War and the last two decades seemed to confirm the ascendancy of this specific kind of warfare over ‘conventional’ or ‘symmetric warfare’ and the setting of a pattern that will probably continue for some time.4 Counter-insurgency represents therefore a topic worth to study not only by virtue of its prominence in the history of warfare, but also in light of the nature of the conflicts confronting the international community, either currently and possibly also in the near future.
    [Show full text]