Introduction of the Class of 2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Jack Boyd and Hans Mark
INSIGHT | ASK MAGAZINE | 35 From Masters with Masters: Jack Boyd and Hans Mark In August 2012, NASA Chief Knowledge Officer and Academy of Program/Project and Engineering Leadership Director Ed Hoffman sat down with Hans Mark, from the University of Texas at Austin, and NASA’s Jack Boyd at the Ames Research Center as part of the Academy’s Masters with Masters series. Dr. Mark has held several roles, including NASA deputy administrator, Ames center director, chancellor of the University of Texas, secretary and undersecretary of the air force, director of the National Reconnaissance Office, and director of research and engineering at the Department of Defense. Jack Boyd has worked at Ames for more than sixty years and is the senior advisor to the Ames center director. He has been the NASA associate administrator for management, and has also served as the acting deputy center director for Ames. Ames engineers (left to right) Allen Faye, Merrill Mead, and Jack Boyd discuss aircraft design and handling. Photo Credit: NASA/Ames Research Center 36 | ASK MAGAZINE retneh Ccraeses RemA/ASA: Ntidero CtohP Ntidero RemA/ASA: Ccraeses retneh At a farewell party for Dr. Hans Mark, Ames center director from 1969 to 1977, are (left to right) Alan Chambers, Dale Compton, Jack Boyd, Hans Mark, Lloyd Jones, and John Dusterberry. Hoffman: How did you start working together? should NASA be doing today to be able to respond to a time where there is a lot of uncertainty? Boyd: I got a call from the about-to-be administrator, Jim Beggs, saying he had this young fella he wanted me to show Mark: Many people sitting in this room today remember the around Ames. -
Chemical Engineering Education Graduate Education in Chemical Engineering
I • N • D • E • X GRADUATE EDUCATION ADVERTISEMENTS Akron, Uni versity of. .......... , .... ... .................. 321 Iowa State Uni versity .................. ... ....... ....... 360 Pensylvania State Uni versity ........................ 395 Alabama, University of ................................ 322 Johns Hopkins University .... .... .. .... .... .......... 361 Pittsburgh, University of .............................. 396 Alabama, Huntsville; Uni versity of.. .... .. ..... 323 Kansas, University of ............................... .... 362 Polytechnic University .. .... ... .... ........... .. ..... .. 397 Alberta, Uni versity of .. ........ .... .. .... ... ..... ..... .. 324 Kansas State University ............... ... ...... ........ 363 Princeton University ....................... .......... .. .. 398 Arizona, University of ....... .. .... .. .... ... .. ... ....... 325 Kentucky, Uni versity of ........................ .. ..... 364 Purdue University .. ........... ... ... ....... ... .... .... ... 399 Arizona State University ..... .. ... ...... ..... ......... 326 Lamar University .. ... ..... ..... ......... ........... .. ..... 430 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute .... ...... .... ... .. 400 Auburn Uni versity .. ..... .. ... ..... .. .............. .... ... 327 Laval Universite ...................... ........... ...... .. .. 365 Rhode Island, University of.. .... ..... .. ... ..... .. ... 435 Bri gham Young Uni versity .............. ... .. ..... ... 427 Lehigh University .................................. .... ... 366 Rice University -
2008 Annual Report
2008 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING THE FUTURE 1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 Program Reports 4 Engineering Education 4 Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education 6 Technological Literacy 6 Public Understanding of Engineering Developing Effective Messages Media Relations Public Relations Grand Challenges for Engineering 8 Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society 9 Diversity in the Engineering Workforce Engineer Girl! Website Engineer Your Life Project Engineering Equity Extension Service 10 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers-Gilbreth Lectures 12 Engineering and Health Care 14 Technology and Peace Building 14 Technology for a Quieter America 15 America’s Energy Future 16 Terrorism and the Electric Power-Delivery System 16 U.S.-China Cooperation on Electricity from Renewables 17 U.S.-China Symposium on Science and Technology Strategic Policy 17 Offshoring of Engineering 18 Gathering Storm Still Frames the Policy Debate 20 2008 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2008 New Members and Foreign Associates 24 2008 NAE Anniversary Members 28 2008 Private Contributions 28 Einstein Society 28 Heritage Society 29 Golden Bridge Society 29 Catalyst Society 30 Rosette Society 30 Challenge Society 30 Charter Society 31 Other Individual Donors 34 The Presidents’ Circle 34 Corporations, Foundations, and Other Organizations 35 National Academy of Engineering Fund Financial Report 37 Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants 41 Notes to Financial Statements 53 Officers 53 Councillors 54 Staff 54 NAE Publications Letter from the President Engineering is critical to meeting the fundamental challenges facing the U.S. economy in the 21st century. -
By Dean R. Johnson
Alice Symposium 2009 Duke University “Who needs PowerPoint? I’ve got Alice!” By Dean R. Johnson I. Background of My Experience in Programming II. Experience with Alice A. Changes in Languages and Student Population B. Introducing Alice C. Enrollment Data III. History Lesson: Significant People in Computing A. Paper B. PowerPoint C. Alice 1. Lesson Plan 2. Grading Rubric IV. Sample Projects: Screenshots and descriptions of Student Work I. Background I started my study of Computer Science in 1982 as a high school senior when I enrolled in a one semester course titled “Computer Programming.” It was taught by my math teacher and at first seemed like a very mystifying idea. We wrote programs in BASIC b y “bubbling in” punch cards. After completing the program, we took the stack of cards to the back of the room handing them to our teacher. He was the only one allowed to insert the cards into the card reader. The PDP-11 interpreted our program and if it ran successfully, the dot matrix printer printed a table of the whole numbers from one to ten and their squares. It was amazing. The strange thing about this description is that it brings back such fond memories for me. It was during this brief exposure to programming that I was hooked for life. This is what drives me on a daily basis to do the best I can to expose students to the fascinating world of programming. I graduated from UW-Whitewater in 1986 with a Major in Mathematics and a Minor in Computer Science. -
18 – 20 November 2012
65th Annual meeting of the Division of Fluid Dynamics 18 – 20 November 2012 Table of Contents Welcome ................................................................................................................................... 2 65th Annual Meeting Committee .............................................................................................. 3 APS/DFD 2012 Officers and Committees ................................................................................. 4-5 DFD Events .............................................................................................................................. 6 Registration Desk Hours ................................................................................................ 6 Speaker Ready Room Hours ......................................................................................... 6 DFD Executive Committee Meeting .............................................................................. 6 Awards Ceremony ......................................................................................................... 6 Invited Lectures ............................................................................................................. 6 Conference Dinner ........................................................................................................ 6 Gallery of Fluid Motion ................................................................................................... 6 Poster Information ........................................................................................................ -
Marconi Society - Wikipedia
9/23/2019 Marconi Society - Wikipedia Marconi Society The Guglielmo Marconi International Fellowship Foundation, briefly called Marconi Foundation and currently known as The Marconi Society, was established by Gioia Marconi Braga in 1974[1] to commemorate the centennial of the birth (April 24, 1874) of her father Guglielmo Marconi. The Marconi International Fellowship Council was established to honor significant contributions in science and technology, awarding the Marconi Prize and an annual $100,000 grant to a living scientist who has made advances in communication technology that benefits mankind. The Marconi Fellows are Sir Eric A. Ash (1984), Paul Baran (1991), Sir Tim Berners-Lee (2002), Claude Berrou (2005), Sergey Brin (2004), Francesco Carassa (1983), Vinton G. Cerf (1998), Andrew Chraplyvy (2009), Colin Cherry (1978), John Cioffi (2006), Arthur C. Clarke (1982), Martin Cooper (2013), Whitfield Diffie (2000), Federico Faggin (1988), James Flanagan (1992), David Forney, Jr. (1997), Robert G. Gallager (2003), Robert N. Hall (1989), Izuo Hayashi (1993), Martin Hellman (2000), Hiroshi Inose (1976), Irwin M. Jacobs (2011), Robert E. Kahn (1994) Sir Charles Kao (1985), James R. Killian (1975), Leonard Kleinrock (1986), Herwig Kogelnik (2001), Robert W. Lucky (1987), James L. Massey (1999), Robert Metcalfe (2003), Lawrence Page (2004), Yash Pal (1980), Seymour Papert (1981), Arogyaswami Paulraj (2014), David N. Payne (2008), John R. Pierce (1979), Ronald L. Rivest (2007), Arthur L. Schawlow (1977), Allan Snyder (2001), Robert Tkach (2009), Gottfried Ungerboeck (1996), Andrew Viterbi (1990), Jack Keil Wolf (2011), Jacob Ziv (1995). In 2015, the prize went to Peter T. Kirstein for bringing the internet to Europe. Since 2008, Marconi has also issued the Paul Baran Marconi Society Young Scholar Awards. -
Prizes and Awards Session
PRIZES AND AWARDS SESSION Wednesday, July 12, 2021 9:00 AM EDT 2021 SIAM Annual Meeting July 19 – 23, 2021 Held in Virtual Format 1 Table of Contents AWM-SIAM Sonia Kovalevsky Lecture ................................................................................................... 3 George B. Dantzig Prize ............................................................................................................................. 5 George Pólya Prize for Mathematical Exposition .................................................................................... 7 George Pólya Prize in Applied Combinatorics ......................................................................................... 8 I.E. Block Community Lecture .................................................................................................................. 9 John von Neumann Prize ......................................................................................................................... 11 Lagrange Prize in Continuous Optimization .......................................................................................... 13 Ralph E. Kleinman Prize .......................................................................................................................... 15 SIAM Prize for Distinguished Service to the Profession ....................................................................... 17 SIAM Student Paper Prizes .................................................................................................................... -
A Short History of Computational Complexity
The Computational Complexity Column by Lance FORTNOW NEC Laboratories America 4 Independence Way, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA [email protected] http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/fortnow/beatcs Every third year the Conference on Computational Complexity is held in Europe and this summer the University of Aarhus (Denmark) will host the meeting July 7-10. More details at the conference web page http://www.computationalcomplexity.org This month we present a historical view of computational complexity written by Steve Homer and myself. This is a preliminary version of a chapter to be included in an upcoming North-Holland Handbook of the History of Mathematical Logic edited by Dirk van Dalen, John Dawson and Aki Kanamori. A Short History of Computational Complexity Lance Fortnow1 Steve Homer2 NEC Research Institute Computer Science Department 4 Independence Way Boston University Princeton, NJ 08540 111 Cummington Street Boston, MA 02215 1 Introduction It all started with a machine. In 1936, Turing developed his theoretical com- putational model. He based his model on how he perceived mathematicians think. As digital computers were developed in the 40's and 50's, the Turing machine proved itself as the right theoretical model for computation. Quickly though we discovered that the basic Turing machine model fails to account for the amount of time or memory needed by a computer, a critical issue today but even more so in those early days of computing. The key idea to measure time and space as a function of the length of the input came in the early 1960's by Hartmanis and Stearns. -
Replace with Your Title
Advancing Vertical Flight: A Historical Perspective on AHS International and its Times M.E. Rhett Flater L. Kim Smith AHS Executive Director (1991-2011) AHS Deputy Director (1993-2011) M. E. Rhett Flater & Associates M.E. Rhett Flater & Associates Pine Knoll Shores, NC Pine Knoll Shores, NC ABSTRACT1 This paper describes AHS’s vital role in the development of the rotorcraft industry, with particular emphasis on events since 1990. It includes first-hand accounts of the formation of the Society, how it matured and evolved, and the particular influences that compelled change. It describes key events which occurred during various stages of the Society’s growth, including the formation of its technical committees, the evolution of the AHS Annual Forum and technical specialists’ meetings, and the creation and evolution of the Society’s publications. Featured prominently are accounts of AHS’s role in pursuing a combined government, industry and academia approach to rotorcraft science and technology. Also featured is the creation in 1965 of the Army-NASA Agreement for Joint Participation in Aeronautics Technology, the establishment of the U.S. Army Rotorcraft Centers of Excellence, the National Rotorcraft Technology Center (NRTC), the inauguration of the Congressional Rotorcraft Caucus and its support for the U.S. defense industrial base for rotorcraft, the battle for the survival of NASA aeronautics and critical NASA subsonic ground test facilities, and the launching of the International Helicopter Safety Team (IHST). First Annual AHS Banquet, October 7, 1944. 1Presented at the AHS 72nd Annual Forum, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA, May 17-19, 2016. Copyright © 2016 by the American Helicopter Society International, Inc. -
A Framework for Representing Knowledge Marvin Minsky MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June, 1974. Reprinted in the Psychology of Comp
A Framework for Representing Knowledge Marvin Minsky MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June, 1974. Reprinted in The Psychology of Computer Vision, P. Winston (Ed.), McGraw-Hill, 1975. Shorter versions in J. Haugeland, Ed., Mind Design, MIT Press, 1981, and in Cognitive Science, Collins, Allan and Edward E. Smith (eds.) Morgan-Kaufmann, 1992 ISBN 55860-013-2] FRAMES It seems to me that the ingredients of most theories both in Artificial Intelligence and in Psychology have been on the whole too minute, local, and unstructured to account–either practically or phenomenologically–for the effectiveness of common-sense thought. The "chunks" of reasoning, language, memory, and "perception" ought to be larger and more structured; their factual and procedural contents must be more intimately connected in order to explain the apparent power and speed of mental activities. Similar feelings seem to be emerging in several centers working on theories of intelligence. They take one form in the proposal of Papert and myself (1972) to sub-structure knowledge into "micro-worlds"; another form in the "Problem-spaces" of Newell and Simon (1972); and yet another in new, large structures that theorists like Schank (1974), Abelson (1974), and Norman (1972) assign to linguistic objects. I see all these as moving away from the traditional attempts both by behavioristic psychologists and by logic-oriented students of Artificial Intelligence in trying to represent knowledge as collections of separate, simple fragments. I try here to bring together several of these issues by pretending to have a unified, coherent theory. The paper raises more questions than it answers, and I have tried to note the theory's deficiencies. -
2008 ANNUAL REPORT NACME: Creating Opportunities, Ensuring Success
SYNERGIES 2008 ANNUAL REPORT NACME: CReaTING OPPORTUNITIES, enSURING SUcceSS OUR MISSION To provide leadership and support for the national effort to increase the representation of successful African American, American Indian, and Latino women and men in engineering and technology, math-, and science-based careers. OUR VISION An engineering workforce that looks like America. OUR GOAL Working with our partners to produce an engineering graduating class that looks like America. OUR PURPOSE Our aim is diversity with equity, our metric is parity in the workforce, and our methodology is the formation of partnerships with those corporations, educational institutions, foundations, nonprofit agencies, and governmental bodies that share a commitment to these aims. OUR BELIEFS We believe in the concept of the “learning organization,” a community in which each member is encouraged and assisted to grow and develop. We believe that we must work not only to improve our skills and capabilities for performing our individual responsibilities increasingly well, but also to strive to be cooperative and effective team members who are committed collectively to the fulfillment of NACME’s mission and purposes. C O N T E N T S A Joint Message from the Chairman and the President 2 A Message from the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 3 Educational Programs 4 Research and Policy 8 Institutional Advancement and Operations 14 Financial Statements 16 Donors and Partners 18 Board, Officers, and Staff 20 Pictured on this page, from top: Nicholas M. Donofrio, executive vice president, Innovation & Technology, IBM Corporation; Lisa Frehill, executive director, Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology; NACME Scholar Kenie Moses (see profile on page 7); Irving Pressley McPhail, NACME executive vice president and COO, with Carl B. -
The Computational Attitude in Music Theory
The Computational Attitude in Music Theory Eamonn Bell Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2019 © 2019 Eamonn Bell All rights reserved ABSTRACT The Computational Attitude in Music Theory Eamonn Bell Music studies’s turn to computation during the twentieth century has engendered particular habits of thought about music, habits that remain in operation long after the music scholar has stepped away from the computer. The computational attitude is a way of thinking about music that is learned at the computer but can be applied away from it. It may be manifest in actual computer use, or in invocations of computationalism, a theory of mind whose influence on twentieth-century music theory is palpable. It may also be manifest in more informal discussions about music, which make liberal use of computational metaphors. In Chapter 1, I describe this attitude, the stakes for considering the computer as one of its instruments, and the kinds of historical sources and methodologies we might draw on to chart its ascendance. The remainder of this dissertation considers distinct and varied cases from the mid-twentieth century in which computers or computationalist musical ideas were used to pursue new musical objects, to quantify and classify musical scores as data, and to instantiate a generally music-structuralist mode of analysis. I present an account of the decades-long effort to prepare an exhaustive and accurate catalog of the all-interval twelve-tone series (Chapter 2). This problem was first posed in the 1920s but was not solved until 1959, when the composer Hanns Jelinek collaborated with the computer engineer Heinz Zemanek to jointly develop and run a computer program.