DOCSLIB.ORG

The Way Forward a New Literary History of America a Conv

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Way Forward a New Literary History of America a Conv american academy of arts & sciences spring 2010 Bulletin vol. lxiii, no. 3 Page 7 A New Literary History of America Werner Sollors and Greil Marcus David Brady and Pamela S. Karlan Page 15 Challenges to Business and Society in the Twenty-First Century: The Way Forward Rajat K. Gupta and Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. Daniel Yankelovich Page 22 A Conversation on Evolving U.S. Policy toward Russia Robert Legvold and Thomas Graham inside: The Humanities: The Case for Data, Page 1 Book of Members, Page 6 From the Archives, Page 36 Calendar of Events Save the Date: Induction Weekend Friday, Sunday, Contents October 8, 2010 October 10, 2010 Evening Reception and Program– Sunday Symposium–Cambridge Cambridge Academy Projects For information and reservations, contact The Humanities: The Case for Data 1 Saturday, the Events Of½ce (phone: 617-576-5032; October 9, 2010 email: [email protected]). Book of Members 6 2010 Induction Ceremony–Cambridge Academy Meetings A New Literary History of America Werner Sollors and Greil Marcus 7 Challenges to Business and Society in the Twenty-First Century: The Way Forward Rajat K. Gupta and Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. 15 A Conversation on Evolving U.S. Policy toward Russia Robert Legvold and Thomas Graham 22 Noteworthy 32 From the Archives 36 Fellows and Friends Again Contribute More than $1.5 million to the Annual Fund In the recently completed ½scal year, the Academy’s Annual Fund surpassed last year’s total and the $1.5 million mark for the fourth consecutive year–nearly 1,200 donors helped to accomplish this goal. Development Committee Chair Alan Dachs noted that “every Annual Fund gift was important in achieving these results. Academy research projects and studies are having more influence and impact than ever before on informed national policy. This important work and other Academy programs and activities across the country rely on resources provided by a successful Annual Fund.” The Academy is indebted to the Fellows, friends, foundations, and staff members for supporting its work. We are particularly grateful to a growing number of leader- ship donors. A complete list of contributors to the 2009–2010 Annual Fund will appear in the Academy’s Annual Report, which will be published in the fall. The members of the Development and Public Relations Committee in fy 2010 were Louis W. Cabot, Robert A. Alberty, and Alan M. Dachs, cochairs; David Alexander, Jesse H. Choper, Michael E. Gellert, Charles M. Haar, Stephen Stamas, Donald M. Stewart, and Nicholas T. Zervas. Academy Projects The Humanities: The Case for Data In her 2008 plenary address to the annual access, poorly disseminated, unwittingly the model of the sei, the American Academy meeting of the Association of American Col- ignored, and routinely underutilized.”2 of Arts and Sciences initiated the Humanities leges and Universities, philosopher and legal Indicators (www.humanitiesindicators.org), Scientists have long recognized the value of scholar Martha Nussbaum spoke eloquently a demonstration project to enrich public having statistical data to measure the scope of how a liberal arts education conveys hu- understanding of the humanities by increas- and vitality of education, research, and work- manistic “abilities of citizenship” such as ing our empirical knowledge of the human- force development in their ½elds. Such data critical thinking, cultural literacy, and nar- ities in action, both within schools and support evidence-based policy discussions rative imagination. She emphasized that colleges as well as in other social contexts. in professional and governmental forums. these abilities promote human development Supported by generous grants from the Since 1982, the National Science Board has in the broadest terms and encourage respon- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and been required by law to publish Science and sible engagement in a pluralistic democracy the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, the Engineering Indicators (sei), a biennial report and in the global economy.1 Nussbaum’s Indicators are the culmination of several providing a range of quantitative informa- case for the liberal arts, and for the human- years of planning and collaboration with tion about U.S. science, engineering, and ities in particular, merits serious considera- many of the country’s leading humanities tion, especially at a time when the concept organizations, including the National En- of a knowledge-based society is widely em- For the ½rst time, we have dowment for the Humanities and the Amer- braced and policy-makers focus on econom- ican Council of Learned Societies. The ic competitiveness and Americans’ scienti½c in one place baseline statis- project was codirected by Academy Fellows and technical competencies. tics about many areas of Steven Marcus, the George Delacorte Pro- fessor in the Humanities Emeritus at Co- How do we determine whether our colleges concern to the humanities lumbia University; Patricia Meyer Spacks, and universities are adequately cultivating the Edgar F. Shannon Professor of English “abilities of citizenship” in our students? community. Emerita at the University of Virginia; and How do we assess the teaching of complex Norman M. Bradburn, the Tiffany and literacy skills and critical thinking? What technology in domestic and global contexts. Margaret Blake Distinguished Service Pro- do we know about student attainment in With the sei data available as an authori- fessor Emeritus at the University of Chicago foreign languages and cultural understand- tative point of reference, stakeholders can and senior fellow at the National Opinion ing as graduates set out to pursue careers in engage in well-informed discussions and Research Center (norc). a rapidly changing global economy? What make consequential decisions about invest- do we know about the humanities workforce ments in science and technology, including The Indicators provide a prototype for col- within and beyond educational institutions? stem education and basic research in col- lecting data necessary to answer questions The search for answers to questions such as leges and universities. about the state of the humanities and how these would bene½t from reliable, compre- they are faring. For the ½rst time, we have Nothing similar exists for the humanities hensive, and ongoing quantitative informa- in one place baseline statistics about many even though the 1985 reauthorization of the tion about the state of the humanities in our areas of concern to the humanities com- National Endowment for the Humanities country. As Francis Oakley, Edward Dorr munity, including k–12 education in the called for a “national information and data Professor of History and President Emeri- humanities, undergraduate and graduate collection system on humanities scholars, tus of Williams College, has suggested, “For education in the humanities, the humani- educational and cultural groups, and audi- the humanities, perhaps surprisingly, such ties workforce, research and funding for the ences.”3 Such data are critical. Following data [have been] either altogether lacking, humanities, and the humanities in Ameri- or were inconsistently assembled, hard to can life beyond the academy. The project 2 Francis Oakley, “The Humanities Indicators Proj- also enables the coherent tracking of a vari- ect,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences ety of trends in the humanities. Narrative 1 Martha Nussbaum, “Education for Pro½t, Education 62 (2) (Winter 2009): 27. for Freedom,” Liberal Education 95 (3) (Summer 2009): 3 National Endowment for the Humanities, U.S. Code, summaries of salient trends and relevant 6–13. Title 20, sec. 956, 1985. contexts support more than seventy indica- Bulletin of the American Academy, Spring 2010 1 Academy Projects tors and two hundred graphs. The oversight students get older is also evident, suggesting Overall, the humanities of Norman Bradburn and norc ensures that students do not continue to develop that the Indicators conform to the highest the competencies introduced in primary have lost signi½cant market standards of accuracy and usefulness. school. share to vocational degrees, Since publicly launching its online database More than half of the students graduat- in January 2009, the Academy has frequently ing from our high schools in 2006 failed primarily business. updated the ½ndings. More than one million to demonstrate basic knowledge of his- visits to the Indicators website suggest tory, and over a third of the students become primary and secondary teachers in lacked basic knowledge of civics. widespread interest in this portfolio of humanities subjects. Humanities competency is concentrated statistics. We hope to sustain and expand Data on postsecondary education con½rm in a relatively small number of students. the project as new data, methodologies, and a decline in bachelor’s and doctoral degree Only a modest percentage of the nation’s disciplinary questions emerge. Past efforts completions in humanities programs over to collect humanities data have been epi- young people are leaving high school with at least pro½ciency–versus only the most the last forty years, following peak levels in sodic, with the dissemination of ½ndings basic skills–in history (13 percent) or the late 1960s and early 1970s. A modest re- limited to occasional publications. For data civics (27 percent). [Indicators i–3 and covery starting in the early 1990s continued to be valuable to the widest constituency, i–4; see Figures 1 and 2] through at least 2004. In the three largest their collection and use must be ongoing, k disciplines–English, history, and foreign and we look to governmental agencies and Indicators on –12 teacher quali½cations tell us that the humanities face the same is- languages–data indicate slight declines in the scholarly community to help sustain us sues of teacher preparedness as math and absolute numbers of doctoral degrees in the in this effort. science. The lack of well-prepared teachers ½rst half of the past decade. As measured is especially severe in some core humanities against the increasing number of students The Indicators allow us to subjects.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2008 Annual Report
    2008 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING THE FUTURE 1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 Program Reports 4 Engineering Education 4 Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education 6 Technological Literacy 6 Public Understanding of Engineering Developing Effective Messages Media Relations Public Relations Grand Challenges for Engineering 8 Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society 9 Diversity in the Engineering Workforce Engineer Girl! Website Engineer Your Life Project Engineering Equity Extension Service 10 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers-Gilbreth Lectures 12 Engineering and Health Care 14 Technology and Peace Building 14 Technology for a Quieter America 15 America’s Energy Future 16 Terrorism and the Electric Power-Delivery System 16 U.S.-China Cooperation on Electricity from Renewables 17 U.S.-China Symposium on Science and Technology Strategic Policy 17 Offshoring of Engineering 18 Gathering Storm Still Frames the Policy Debate 20 2008 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2008 New Members and Foreign Associates 24 2008 NAE Anniversary Members 28 2008 Private Contributions 28 Einstein Society 28 Heritage Society 29 Golden Bridge Society 29 Catalyst Society 30 Rosette Society 30 Challenge Society 30 Charter Society 31 Other Individual Donors 34 The Presidents’ Circle 34 Corporations, Foundations, and Other Organizations 35 National Academy of Engineering Fund Financial Report 37 Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants 41 Notes to Financial Statements 53 Officers 53 Councillors 54 Staff 54 NAE Publications Letter from the President Engineering is critical to meeting the fundamental challenges facing the U.S. economy in the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • By Dean R. Johnson
    Alice Symposium 2009 Duke University “Who needs PowerPoint? I’ve got Alice!” By Dean R. Johnson I. Background of My Experience in Programming II. Experience with Alice A. Changes in Languages and Student Population B. Introducing Alice C. Enrollment Data III. History Lesson: Significant People in Computing A. Paper B. PowerPoint C. Alice 1. Lesson Plan 2. Grading Rubric IV. Sample Projects: Screenshots and descriptions of Student Work I. Background I started my study of Computer Science in 1982 as a high school senior when I enrolled in a one semester course titled “Computer Programming.” It was taught by my math teacher and at first seemed like a very mystifying idea. We wrote programs in BASIC b y “bubbling in” punch cards. After completing the program, we took the stack of cards to the back of the room handing them to our teacher. He was the only one allowed to insert the cards into the card reader. The PDP-11 interpreted our program and if it ran successfully, the dot matrix printer printed a table of the whole numbers from one to ten and their squares. It was amazing. The strange thing about this description is that it brings back such fond memories for me. It was during this brief exposure to programming that I was hooked for life. This is what drives me on a daily basis to do the best I can to expose students to the fascinating world of programming. I graduated from UW-Whitewater in 1986 with a Major in Mathematics and a Minor in Computer Science.
    [Show full text]
  • The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet
    The People Who Invented the Internet Source: Wikipedia's History of the Internet PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:49:54 UTC Contents Articles History of the Internet 1 Barry Appelman 26 Paul Baran 28 Vint Cerf 33 Danny Cohen (engineer) 41 David D. Clark 44 Steve Crocker 45 Donald Davies 47 Douglas Engelbart 49 Charles M. Herzfeld 56 Internet Engineering Task Force 58 Bob Kahn 61 Peter T. Kirstein 65 Leonard Kleinrock 66 John Klensin 70 J. C. R. Licklider 71 Jon Postel 77 Louis Pouzin 80 Lawrence Roberts (scientist) 81 John Romkey 84 Ivan Sutherland 85 Robert Taylor (computer scientist) 89 Ray Tomlinson 92 Oleg Vishnepolsky 94 Phil Zimmermann 96 References Article Sources and Contributors 99 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 102 Article Licenses License 103 History of the Internet 1 History of the Internet The history of the Internet began with the development of electronic computers in the 1950s. This began with point-to-point communication between mainframe computers and terminals, expanded to point-to-point connections between computers and then early research into packet switching. Packet switched networks such as ARPANET, Mark I at NPL in the UK, CYCLADES, Merit Network, Tymnet, and Telenet, were developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s using a variety of protocols. The ARPANET in particular led to the development of protocols for internetworking, where multiple separate networks could be joined together into a network of networks. In 1982 the Internet Protocol Suite (TCP/IP) was standardized and the concept of a world-wide network of fully interconnected TCP/IP networks called the Internet was introduced.
    [Show full text]
  • SALUTE to Graduates
    VIRTUAL SALUTE TO Graduates THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Dear CCNY Graduates of the Class of 2021, There are moments in our history that impress an indelible mark upon us, when we are called to do extraordinary things under the press of an indescribable moment. Anyone graduating in the midst of the COVID19 pandemic will be marked by this extraordinary moment. But even among that national class graduating in 2021, you are different. We stand at the cusp of a national return from the isolation, peril and social dislocation of the pandemic. We will, all of us, be marked by these dangerous years, by what we have come through and endured, but no less, by how we Vince Boudreau rise and respond. At a time when the inequitable imprint of this scourge President underscores the other inequities in our society, the City College—and those who work, study and graduate here—stand apart. You graduate from an institution established to redress inequality, an institution that insists on each generation of graduates the responsibility of scanning the social and political landscape, and setting out to rectify that which seems unfair, unjust or inequitable. As an institution, we were made for this moment, a moment when the revival of so much that we hold dear requires the energy, insight and creativity of the whole people. As graduates of CCNY, you now shoulder the responsibility of advancing your vision of a strong and just society, as so many before you have done. You have struggled, sometimes mightily and against long odds, to reach this day, and we revel with you in the pride of your accomplishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications Core Magazine, 2007 Read
    CA PUBLICATIONo OF THE COMPUTERre HISTORY MUSEUM ⁄⁄ SPRINg–SUMMER 2007 REMARKABLE PEOPLE R E scuE d TREAsuREs A collection saved by SAP Focus on E x TRAORdinARy i MAGEs Computers through the Robert Noyce lens of Mark Richards PUBLISHER & Ed I t o R - I n - c hie f THE BEST WAY Karen M. Tucker E X E c U t I V E E d I t o R TO SEE THE FUTURE Leonard J. Shustek M A n A GI n G E d I t o R OF COMPUTING IS Robert S. Stetson A S S o c IA t E E d I t o R TO BROWSE ITS PAST. Kirsten Tashev t E c H n I c A L E d I t o R Dag Spicer E d I t o R Laurie Putnam c o n t RIBU t o RS Leslie Berlin Chris garcia Paula Jabloner Luanne Johnson Len Shustek Dag Spicer Kirsten Tashev d E S IG n Kerry Conboy P R o d U c t I o n ma n ager Robert S. Stetson W E BSI t E M A n AGER Bob Sanguedolce W E BSI t E d ESIG n The computer. In all of human history, rarely has one invention done Dana Chrisler so much to change the world in such a short time. Ton Luong The Computer History Museum is home to the world’s largest collection computerhistory.org/core of computing artifacts and offers a variety of exhibits, programs, and © 2007 Computer History Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Kleinrock Papers LSC.2337
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8kd240b No online items Finding Aid for the Leonard Kleinrock Papers LSC.2337 Finding aid prepared by Sonia Collazo and UCLA Library Special Collections staff, 2013 Processing was supported by UCLA University Archives and Kleinrock Internet History Center. UCLA Library Special Collections Online finding aid last updated 16 July 2020. Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 [email protected] URL: https://www.library.ucla.edu/special-collections Finding Aid for the Leonard LSC.2337 1 Kleinrock Papers LSC.2337 Contributing Institution: UCLA Library Special Collections Title: Leonard Kleinrock papers Source: United States. Advanced Research Projects Agency Identifier/Call Number: LSC.2337 Physical Description: 2.4 Linear Feet(6 document boxes) Date (inclusive): 1957-1980 Abstract: Leonard Kleinrock, UCLA faculty in Computer Science since 1964. He received his BA from CCNY and MA and PhD from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Kleinrock ran the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Network Measurement Center (NMC), the first ARPANET node. The Kleinrock Papers include: McGraw-Hill Publishers correspondence; technical notes; Advanced Research Projects Agency progress reports; publications materials; Interface Message processor logs; SPADE administrative notes; Miscellaneous Network Notes; ARPANET Satellite System notes; Packet Radio Temp notes; and Networks Use Technical notes. Stored off-site at SRLF. All requests to access special collections materials must be made in advance through our electronic paging system using the request button located on this page. Language of Material: English . Conditions Governing Access COLLECTION STORED OFF-SITE AT SRLF: Open for research.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of the Class of 2020
    National Academy of Engineering October 4, 2020 CLASS OF 2020 Members and International Members CLASS OF 2020 MEMBERS Class of 2020: Members In February 2020 the members of the NAE elected 86 new members and 18 new international members. Election to the NAE is one of the highest professional distinctions conferred on engineers. The main criteria for membership in the National Academy of Engineering are outstanding personal contributions and accomplishments in one or both of the following categories: 1. Engineering research, practice, or education, including, where appropriate, significant contributions to the engineering literature. 2020 2. Pioneering of new and developing fields of technology, making major advancements in traditional fields of engineering, or MEMBERS developing/implementing innovative approaches to engineering education, or providing engineering leadership of major endeavors. The following pages feature the names, photographs, and election citations of each newly elected member and international member. The numbers following their names denote primary and secondary NAE section affiliations. Dr. Lilia A. Abron (4) Dr. Saeed D. Barbat (10) President and Chief Executive Officer Executive Technical Leader Safety, Policy, and CLASS OF PEER Consultants, P.C. Vehicle Analytical Tools Ford Motor Company For leadership in providing technology-driven sustainable housing and environmental For leadership in automotive safety and engineering solutions in the United States and contributions to the science of crashworthiness, South Africa. occupant protection, and biomechanics. Ms. Eleanor J. Allen (4) Dr. Peter J. Basser (2) Chief Executive Officer NIH Senior Investigator Water for People Section on Quantitative Imaging & Tissue Sciences For leadership and advocacy in making clean National Institutes of Health National Institute of water and sanitation systems accessible to Child Health and Human Development people around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • COMP 516 Research Methods in Computer Science Research Methods in Computer Science Lecture 3: Who Is Who in Computer Science Research
    COMP 516 COMP 516 Research Methods in Computer Science Research Methods in Computer Science Lecture 3: Who is Who in Computer Science Research Dominik Wojtczak Dominik Wojtczak Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool 1 / 24 2 / 24 Prizes and Awards Alan M. Turing (1912-1954) Scientific achievement is often recognised by prizes and awards Conferences often give a best paper award, sometimes also a best “The father of modern computer science” student paper award In 1936 introduced Turing machines, as a thought Example: experiment about limits of mechanical computation ICALP Best Paper Prize (Track A, B, C) (Church-Turing thesis) For the best paper, as judged by the program committee Gives rise to the concept of Turing completeness and Professional organisations also give awards based on varying Turing reducibility criteria In 1939/40, Turing designed an electromechanical machine which Example: helped to break the german Enigma code British Computer Society Roger Needham Award His main contribution was an cryptanalytic machine which used Made annually for a distinguished research contribution in computer logic-based techniques science by a UK based researcher within ten years of their PhD In the 1950 paper ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’ Turing Arguably, the most prestigious award in Computer Science is the introduced an experiment, now called the Turing test A. M. Turing Award 2012 is the Alan Turing year! 3 / 24 4 / 24 Turing Award Turing Award Winners What contribution have the following people made? The A. M. Turing Award is given annually by the Association for Who among them has received the Turing Award? Computing Machinery to an individual selected for contributions of a technical nature made Frances E.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Studies Assocation Working Paper Series
    INDUSTRY STUDIES ASSOCATION WORKING PAPER SERIES Balancing Intrapreneurial Innovation vs. Entrepreneurial Spinoffs During Periods of Technological Ferment By Joel West Personal Computing Industry Center University of California, Irvine Irvine, CA 92697 and Lucas Graduate School of Business San José State San José, California 95192 Caroline Simard Anita Borg Institute Palo Alto, CA 94304 2007 Industry Studies Association Working Papers WP-2007-32 http://isapapers.pitt.edu/ BALANCING INTRAPRENEURIAL INNOVATION VS. ENTREPRENEURIAL SPINOFFS DURING PERIODS OF TECHNOLOGICAL FERMENT Joel West, San José State Caroline Simard, Anita Borg Institute ABSTRACT The period immediately after a technological discontinuity allows an innovative startup to exploit a period of ferment and great uncertainty. Meanwhile, mature innovators must develop intrapraneurial capabilities to compete with these new entrants. Using multiple data sources, we examine the innovation capabilities of Linkabit, a firm that exploited the opportunities related to digital communications, and how those capabilities were transferred to informal spinoffs which formed at twice the rate of Fairchild Semiconductor. We discuss the contingent value of innovation capabilities for early stages in a technological regime, as well as the conflicting goals of intrapraneurial development vs. restraining entrepreneurial exodus. INTRODUCTION Discontinuous technological change enables new innovations and the associated goods and services. Such innovations often render obsolete the advantage of established incumbents, and thus creates entrepreneurial opportunities for new firms. At the same time, incumbents don’t voluntarily relinquish their lead to rivals. To cope with such change, a range of both normative and positivist research concludes that incumbents must encourage innovation, individual initiative, flexibility and decentralized authority. Much of the research on incumbent survival has focused on establishing both cultural and structural incentives for intrapraneurial activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew J. and Erna Viterbi Family Archives, 1905-20070335
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt7199r7h1 Online items available Finding Aid for the Andrew J. and Erna Viterbi Family Archives, 1905-20070335 A Guide to the Collection Finding aid prepared by Michael Hooks, Viterbi Family Archivist The Andrew and Erna Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California (USC) First Edition USC Libraries Special Collections Doheny Memorial Library 206 3550 Trousdale Parkway Los Angeles, California, 90089-0189 213-740-5900 [email protected] 2008 University Archives of the University of Southern California Finding Aid for the Andrew J. and Erna 0335 1 Viterbi Family Archives, 1905-20070335 Title: Andrew J. and Erna Viterbi Family Archives Date (inclusive): 1905-2007 Collection number: 0335 creator: Viterbi, Erna Finci creator: Viterbi, Andrew J. Physical Description: 20.0 Linear feet47 document cases, 1 small box, 1 oversize box35000 digital objects Location: University Archives row A Contributing Institution: USC Libraries Special Collections Doheny Memorial Library 206 3550 Trousdale Parkway Los Angeles, California, 90089-0189 Language of Material: English Language of Material: The bulk of the materials are written in English, however other languages are represented as well. These additional languages include Chinese, French, German, Hebrew, Italian, and Japanese. Conditions Governing Access note There are materials within the archives that are marked confidential or proprietary, or that contain information that is obviously confidential. Examples of the latter include letters of references and recommendations for employment, promotions, and awards; nominations for awards and honors; resumes of colleagues of Dr. Viterbi; and grade reports of students in Dr. Viterbi's classes at the University of California, Los Angeles, and the University of California, San Diego.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonard Kleinrock Fe
    Leonard Kleinrock Professor Leonard Kleinrock is Distinguished Professor of Computer Science at UCLA and a father of the Internet. Kleinrock developed the mathematical theory of packet networks, the technology underpinning the Internet, while a graduate student at MIT between 1960 and 1962. He wrote the first paper and published the first book on the subject; he also directed the transmission of the first message ever to pass over the Internet. In September 1969, the Internet was born in his laboratory when his Host computer at UCLA became the first node of the Internet. He was listed by the Los Angeles Times in 1999 as among the "50 People Who Most Influenced Business This Century". Kleinrock received the 2007 National Medal of Science, the highest honor for achievement in science bestowed by the President of the United States. The Medal was awarded "for fundamental contributions to the mathematical theory of modern data networks, for the functional specification of packet switching which is the foundation of the Internet Technology, for mentoring generations of students and for leading the commercialization of technologies that have transformed the world." Leonard Kleinrock received his Ph.D. from MIT in 1963 and has served as a Professor of Computer Science at UCLA since then, serving as Chairman of the department from 1991-1995. He was the first President and Co-founder of Linkabit Corporation, the co- founder of Nomadix, Inc., and Founder and Chairman of TTI/Vanguard, an advanced technology forum organization. He has published over 250 papers and authored six books on a wide array of subjects, including packet switching networks, packet radio networks, local area networks, broadband networks, gigabit networks, nomadic computing, performance evaluation, and peer-to-peer networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Ieee-Level Awards
    IEEE-LEVEL AWARDS The IEEE currently bestows a Medal of Honor, fifteen Medals, thirty-three Technical Field Awards, two IEEE Service Awards, two Corporate Recognitions, two Prize Paper Awards, Honorary Memberships, one Scholarship, one Fellowship, and a Staff Award. The awards and their past recipients are listed below. Citations are available via the “Award Recipients with Citations” links within the information below. Nomination information for each award can be found by visiting the IEEE Awards Web page www.ieee.org/awards or by clicking on the award names below. Links are also available via the Recipient/Citation documents. MEDAL OF HONOR Ernst A. Guillemin 1961 Edward V. Appleton 1962 Award Recipients with Citations (PDF, 26 KB) John H. Hammond, Jr. 1963 George C. Southworth 1963 The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest IEEE Harold A. Wheeler 1964 award. The Medal was established in 1917 and Claude E. Shannon 1966 Charles H. Townes 1967 is awarded for an exceptional contribution or an Gordon K. Teal 1968 extraordinary career in the IEEE fields of Edward L. Ginzton 1969 interest. The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest Dennis Gabor 1970 IEEE award. The candidate need not be a John Bardeen 1971 Jay W. Forrester 1972 member of the IEEE. The IEEE Medal of Honor Rudolf Kompfner 1973 is sponsored by the IEEE Foundation. Rudolf E. Kalman 1974 John R. Pierce 1975 E. H. Armstrong 1917 H. Earle Vaughan 1977 E. F. W. Alexanderson 1919 Robert N. Noyce 1978 Guglielmo Marconi 1920 Richard Bellman 1979 R. A. Fessenden 1921 William Shockley 1980 Lee deforest 1922 Sidney Darlington 1981 John Stone-Stone 1923 John Wilder Tukey 1982 M.
    [Show full text]