<<

2017 Annual Report

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF

ENGINEERING THE FUTURE

1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 NAE Strategic Plan Implementation 6 NAE Annual Meeting 6 2017 NAE Annual Meeting Forum: Autonomy on Land and Sea and in the Air and Space 7 Program Reports 7 Postsecondary Engineering Education Understanding the Engineering Education–Workforce Continuum Engagement of Engineering Societies in Undergraduate Engineering Education The Supply Chain for Middle-Skill Jobs: Education, Training, and Certification Pathways Engineering Technology Education 8 PreK–12 Engineering Education LinkEngineering Educator Capacity Building in PreK–12 Engineering Education 9 Media Relations 10 Grand Challenges for Engineering NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program Global Grand Challenges Summit 12 Center for Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES) Becoming the Online Resource Center for Ethics in Engineering and Workshop on Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Ethics in the Development of Engineers Integrated Network for Social Sustainability 14 Diversity of the Engineering Workforce EngineerGirl Program 15 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers—Gilbreth Lectures 17 Manufacturing, Design, and Innovation Adaptability of the Engineering and Technical Workforce 18 A New Vision for Center-Based Engineering Research 18 Connector Reliability for Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Operations 19 Microbiomes of the Built Environment 20 2017 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2017 New Members and Foreign Members 25 NAE Anniversary Members 30 A Message from NAE Vice President Corale Brierley 31 2017 Honor Roll of Donors 31 Einstein Society 34 Golden Bridge Society 36 Heritage Society 37 Annual Giving Societies 37 Catalyst Society 37 Rosette Society 37 Challenge Society 38 Charter Society 39 Lifetime Giving Societies 41 Other Individual Donors 43 Tributes 44 Loyalty Society 45 Foundations, Corporations, and Other Organizations 48 of Engineering Fund 49 Statements of Financial Position 50 Statement of Activities 52 Statements of Cash Flows 53 Notes to Financial Statements 71 Officers 71 Councillors 72 Staff 72 NAE Publications Letter from the President

In 2017 the National Academy of Engineering invested substantially in dynamic efforts to engage and prepare the next generation of engineers who will tackle the major challenges facing the world. The NAE’s 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering are the template for innovative programs to achieve these goals, and they featured prominently in initiatives and events on a grand scale this year. In July the NAE hosted the 3rd Global Grand Challenges for Engineering Summit (http://ggcs2017.org/), jointly organized with the UK Royal Academy of Engineering and the Chinese Academy of Engineering. It was the largest program in NAE history, with some 900 attendees, more than half of whom were university students from nearly 150 universities in the three countries. A variety of activities engaged students throughout the event. For the Student Day Business Model Competition, five teams of undergraduate students from each host country presented ideas and business C. D. Mote, Jr. models for addressing one or more of the Grand Challenges for Engineering. The first, second, and third place winning teams represented each of the three countries, taking home prizes ranging from $10,000 to $25,000. University students also had the opportunity to present posters related to research on the Grand Challenges, and undergraduate and graduate winners were chosen in three categories—originality, impact, and design. Finally, Bethany Gordon, an engineering student at the , won a unique podcast competition looking at how engineers can improve people’s lives through the Grand Challenges for Engineering. In addition, in a collaborative arrangement with NAE member Dean Kamen, the inaugural FIRST Global Challenge robotics competition (FIRST stands for “For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology”) drew high school student teams representing 157 countries. The contest asked participants to take on the NAE Grand Challenge of “providing access to clean water.” The summit’s principal sponsors—Lockheed Martin Corporation, the Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Shell—helped to ensure a positive experience for all attendees before, during, and after this major event. Representatives from each sponsor participated as speakers, judges, and recruiters. We also received substantial support from NAE members G. Wayne Clough and Ming Hsieh. All these sponsors together made the summit a transformational success. Given the interest young engineers have expressed in the Grand Challenges for Engineering, including their participation in the three global summits, engaging them in the Grand Challenges Scholars Program has the best potential for galvanizing them to work on such large-scale engineering problems. The program is also designed to prepare students for the multicultural, multidisciplinary, socially conscious global engagement needed for 21st century engineering, through an educational supplement that is adaptable to any university engineering education program and enhances students’ competencies in five areas not usually included in an engineering curriculum:

• Research/creativity – Mentored research or creative experience on a Grand Challenge-like topic; talent competency • Multicultural understanding – Understanding cultures, preferably through a multicultural experience, to ensure cultural acceptance of proposed solutions; cultural competency • Multidisciplinarity – Understanding multidisciplinary engineering system solutions, developed through engagement; multidisciplinary competency • Viable business/entrepreneurship – Understanding, preferably developed through experience, the necessity of a viable business model for solution implementation; business competency • Social consciousness – Understanding that solutions should serve primarily people and society— service learning promotes social consciousness; social consciousness competency

1 To help GCSP administrators, faculty, and students share information and collaborate with others around the world, the NAE’s GCSP Network Office held the program’s inaugural annual meeting in November. About 165 people attended—administrators, faculty, students, alumni, industry and federal agency representatives—to exchange lessons learned and ideas about ways to overcome institutional challenges, explore synergy with aligned organizations and industry, build the GCSP community and movement, and enhance global connections. The NAE annual meeting in October explored autonomy on land and sea and in the air and space. This theme was selected because it is global, multicultural, and highly multidisciplinary, relying on communications, artificial intelligence, sensors, virtual and enhanced reality, big data, information technology, security, and so forth. And because autonomy moved from its creators directly to the marketplace—abruptly and powerfully jumping past all issues in between—it is coming fast, coming big, and coming globally with potentially disruptive consequences. The distinguished speakers and panelists at the annual meeting addressed societal and ethical perspectives on autonomy as well as opportunities and challenges. Philanthropy continues to support about a third of the NAE’s work. NAE members, friends, foundations, and corporations committed more than $5.3M overall, including over $1.6M for the NAE Independent Fund (NAE’s annual fund) in 2017. The Chairman’s Challenge spurred giving challenges for 6 additional sections and successfully concluded in 2017; see page 40 for the results. The total also includes, among others, a very generous $2M pledge from John F. McDonnell over 5 years for EngineerGirl to significantly expand its activity, and Chevron’s $250,000 grant to sustain LinkEngineering. In addition, NAE members Dale Compton and Charles Reed, who both passed away recently, included provisions in their estates to help develop the NAE’s future. Their generosity and recognition of the contributions of the NAE are deeply moving and appreciated sincerely. Looking ahead, almost every NAE program and membership activity hinges on private funds— and increasingly so—whether directly or indirectly. That is why we will significantly expand fundraising activity for gifts and grants from individuals, corporations, and foundations in support of the NAE’s mission and signature programs over the next several years. As part of our endeavor, planning has begun for a comprehensive fundraising campaign with the assistance of a development consulting firm to appreciably boost our ability to serve the nation and the world and build support for the NAE’s endowment and key strategic programs. This is imperative to ensure the NAE’s capacity to carry out its mission. Work on developing the case for support and the campaign plan, with inputs from the Council, and a small group of academy members and supporters, began in 2017. I will share more news about this throughout the year. I am most grateful for your thoughtful engagement and generous support of the Academy. The following pages present reports of the NAE’s work in 2017, pursuing our mission to advance the well-being of the nation.

C. D. Mote, Jr. President

2 NAE In Service to the Nation

Every day our nation faces questions related to engineering and technology. What does the nation need to do to prosper in the global economy? What is the role of basic research and development in ensuring future economic development? How do we assess the importance of US manufacturing to national prosperity? How can we ensure that students are aware of the nature of engineering and its importance to the nation, so they can make informed decisions about pursuing an engineering education? How do we ensure that undergraduate engineering education meets the needs of those students? How do we increase the diversity of the engineering workforce? As technology becomes an ever more critical discriminator for US success in the global marketplace for ideas, goods, and services, addressing these questions is increasingly important. Since 1964 the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) has provided independent, objective advice to the nation on engineering-related topics and policies. The NAE operates under the same congressional act of incorporation that established the National Academy of Sciences, signed in 1863 by President , to respond, “whenever called upon by any department or agency of the government, to investigate, examine, experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art.” The NAE’s 2,456 peer-elected members and foreign members are from academia (about 56 percent), industry (36 percent), and nonprofit institutions and government (8 percent). They are leaders in bioengineering, and engineering, electronics, aerospace, earth resources, and civil, mechanical, chemical, industrial, materials, and interdisciplinary engineering. They serve on research and study committees, plan and conduct symposia and workshops, and assist in the work of the academy in many other ways. Activities include collaborative projects at home and abroad to examine technological problems, advising Congress and government agencies on engineering-related matters of national importance, and recognizing and honoring outstanding engineers for their contributions to the well-being of both the nation and the world. The NAE not only responds to requests from the federal government but also engages in activities sponsored by foundations, industry, and state and local governments and funds projects through endowment funds supported by private contributions. It is a unique organization that brings together distinguished engineers for the purpose of improving the lives of people everywhere. The National Academy of Engineering, National Academy of Sciences, and National Academy of Medicine work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Mission Statement The mission of the National Academy of Engineering is to advance the well-being of the nation by promoting a vibrant engineering profession and by marshalling the expertise and insights of eminent engineers to provide independent advice to the federal government on matters involving engineering and technology.

3 2017 NAE Strategic Plan Implementation

In 2015 the NAE council developed and adopted a new strategic plan for the NAE that sets forth the mission, long-term vision, and a five-year plan (2016–20) for the academy building on an assessment of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats facing the organization. It articulated six goals in support of the NAE mission and vision and identifies objectives and specific actions to realize the goals. In 2017 implementation of the NAE strategic plan proceeded apace with progress toward each of the goals, as summarized below and, as appropriate, elaborated in the following pages. 1. Membership Representation: Increase the representation of business, female, younger, foreign, and underrepresented minority members. In 2017, 50 percent of newly elected members were from the business sector, 40 percent from academia, and 10 percent from government and other nonprofit organizations. The NAE membership elected 19 new female members, 6 new underrepresented minority members, and 22 new foreign members. 2. Industry Collaboration: Increase the value of the NAE to industry. NAE officers and senior staff continued to promote the involvement of NAE industrial members in program activities throughout the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM). In 2017 the NAE collaborated with various program units of the National Research Council (NRC) to complete consensus studies of particular interest to industry, including reports on engineering education, the engineering and technical workforce, and the future of multidisciplinary center-based engineering research. 3. Public Understanding: Show how engineering creates a better quality of life. The NAE media relations program continued to exploit opportunities to enhance the visibility and contributions of engineers, engineering, and the NAE through periodic items in newspaper opinion pages, a biweekly newsletter (3,000 subscribers), , Twitter (avg. 2x/day to some 7,800 subscribers), and weekly radio spots as well as media coverage on NPR and “Good Morning, America” and in Science magazine, Slate, Agence France-Presse, and major newspapers. Program initiatives associated with the NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering and the NAE’s promotion of diversity in the engineering workforce helped advance public engagement in and understanding of engineering in 2017. The NAE hosted the third Global Grand Challenges Summit (GGCS 2017) in July in Washington. Organized jointly by the NAE, the Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE), and the Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), with generous financial support from Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Shell, the 3-day summit was attended by roughly 430 engineering students (representing nearly 150 universities) and 430 engineering professionals from the US, UK, China, and other countries. In addition, the NAE’s EngineerGirl program attracted over 800 essays from students in grades 3–12 for its 2017 essay contest, which invited participants to identify and address engineering solutions to help animals and people share the planet. The program also received a $2 million gift from the St. Louis Community Foundation to develop and pilot a hands-on outreach program—the EngineerGirl Ambassadors Program—and a design challenge page on the website. Implemented in collaboration with the Society for Women in Engineering (SWE), the Ambassadors Program will select and mentor cohorts of female high school students to serve as ambassadors for engineering in their local communities.

4 NAE 4. Ensure Engineering Talent: Promote and inspire highly competitive engineering talent in the US workforce. In January 2017 the NAE established the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) Network Office and hired B.L. (Rama) Ramakrishna to direct it. The goal of the GCSP, a certificate-like cocurricular program active at nearly 50 schools of engineering domestically and 6 universities abroad, is to create graduates who are well prepared with not only the technical skills but also the creativity, multidisciplinary understanding, entrepreneurial spirit, global/multicultural perspective, and sense of societal mission necessary to meet the great challenges facing humankind in the 21st century. NAE program activities also advanced this strategic goal in 2016–17 with (1) the publication of four consensus studies (two joint with the NRC) on the status and preparation of major elements of the nation’s engineering and technical workforce, (2) ongoing assessment of the role of engineering professional societies in engineering education, (3) ongoing assessment of the nation’s capacity to prepare K–12 engineering educators, (4) a study of approaches to the integration of the arts, humanities, sciences, engineering, and medicine in higher education, and (5) the successful launch of a redesigned version of the LinkEngineering website and the development and soft launch of an application programming interface (API) that allows collaboration with TeachEngineering, a CU Boulder–administered website rich with K–12 engineering curricula and teaching resources. 5. Global Engagement: Engage globally in support of national interests. The NAE’s bilateral and multilateral Frontiers of Engineering (FOE) symposia with Japan, Germany, China, and the European Union remain strong international programs. We continue to seek new sources of funding for our India-US FOE, and are working closely with NAE members and foreign members to lay the foundation for a possible multilateral FOE with sub-Saharan Africa. As noted above, in collaboration with the RAE and CAE, the NAE organized and hosted the third Global Grand Challenges Summit. 6. Effective Advising: Enhance effective advice to the nation on societal challenges by cooperating with the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Medicine, and National Research Council. During the past 12 months, the NAE and NRC published A New Vision for Center-Based Engineering Research, a consensus study requested by the National Science Foundation; completed a study on subsea bolt and connector reliability for offshore oil and natural gas operations at the request of the US Department of the Interior; and completed a joint NRC/NAE/ NAM research agenda–setting study of microbiomes and the built environment, sponsored by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and National Academy of Sciences’ Cecil and Ida Green Fund.

5 2017 NAE Annual Meeting

2017 NAE Annual Meeting Forum: Autonomy on Land and Sea and in the Air and Space The theme for the annual meeting forum on October 9 was autonomy on land and sea and in the air and space. The forum speakers—Raj Rajkumar of Carnegie Mellon University, James Bellingham of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Claire Tomlin of the University of , Berkeley, and MiMi Aung of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory—are experts in each of the four domains. They explored the capabilities of new technologies, what can be expected in the years ahead, and issues raised by autonomous vehicles. Ali Velshi of NBC News moderated the panel and audience questions. Dr. Rajkumar predicted that, although a fair amount of hyperbole surrounds

NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING the prospect of autonomous vehicles, they will “transform society as we

2017 ANNUAL MEETING know it, reducing crashes, improving the quality of life, and making our October 8–9, 2017 Washington, DC time in the car a lot more productive.” Dr. Bellingham noted that more and more food and energy will come from the sea, and robotics and autonomous systems will play a critical role in this transition. Dr. Tomlin reported that automating aspects of air traffic control requires adapting current rules while keeping humans in the loop, “which makes the automation design more challenging.” Ms. Aung described the development and intended uses of a AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS sophisticated autonomous system that she and her colleagues at JPL have been building: the Mars helicopter, which could fly ahead of a rover or Mars astronauts and send back information, or even go places that they cannot go, extending the reach of human explorers. During the question-and-answer period, the panelists discussed issues that apply to all autonomous vehicles. For example, the amount of data generated by autonomous vehicles needs to be processed, stored, and communicated in an efficient way. Discussion also explored potential transformative impacts of autonomous vehicles on the economy, society, and daily life. Finally, the panelists touched on the many ways autonomous vehicles can inspire young people to innovate, investigate, and explore. Even at very early ages, children can learn about science and engineering through robotics and automation. The forum was complemented by two presentations during the previous day’s plenary session. Joichi Ito of MIT’s Media Lab and Patrick Lin of California Polytechnic State University explored societal and ethical concerns associated with automation and autonomous systems. Mr. Ito observed that many of the ethical issues are related to the design of system interfaces. All systems consist of subsystems and are parts of larger systems, so, he explained, “there is no such thing as pure autonomy.” He made the case for treating autonomous systems as complex adaptive systems, which are better understood and modified using tools such as evolutionary dynamics rather than traditional tools such as product engineering or the design of simple control systems. Dr. Lin discussed ways that AI-based decision making can get it wrong. This happens when artificial intelligence exhibits an “emergent behavior,” an unexpected behavior that results from interactions among the components of a complex system; for instance, autonomous financial trading robots working against each other at digital speeds can crash the stock market for milliseconds at a time. AI can also make a wrong decision if it uses biased, incorrect, or distorted data; thus machine learning programs taught to identify objects by analyzing millions of examples can be thrown off by the introduction of just a slight amount of “noise” in an image. Or AI decision making can introduce the risk of structural biases when algorithms stop further thinking, end discussion, and “crystallize” bias.

Proceedings of the forum will be published in 2018.

6 NAE PROGRAM REPORTS Postsecondary Engineering Education

Understanding the Engineering Education–Workforce Continuum This consensus study, funded by NSF, will generate a more expansive, nuanced, and useful perspective of the educational and career paths and related decision making of both those formally trained in engineering (i.e., those with BS, MS, or PhD degrees in engineering) and those with non-engineering degrees who are employed as engineers in the . The study was overseen and executed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts chaired by NAE member Jean-Lou Chameau (ret., King Abdullah University for Science and Technology [KAUST], Saudi Arabia). The committee collected and synthesized data from national datasets, surveys, and other sources about the characteristics of those working in the United States as engineers as well as those formally educated as engineers but not working in engineering occupations. The study will culminate with the publication and dissemination of a consensus report with findings and recommendations in 2018. PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM Engagement of Engineering Societies in Undergraduate Engineering Education This project, supported by the National Science Foundation, examines the engagement of engineering societies in undergraduate engineering education to ensure capacity in their fields. Among many roles, the societies may provide education opportunities to their members, set and maintain professional standards, help clarify the knowledge and skills needed by those practicing in the field, and serve as a bridge between employers and schools of engineering. The project is overseen by an ad hoc steering committee chaired by NAE member Leah Jamieson (Purdue University). The first phase of the project, conducted in 2016, involved data collection and analysis, including a literature review of the relevant research and a staff analysis of information from engineering societies’ websites about what they are doing in undergraduate engineering education. The core of this phase of the project was a survey of engineering societies with follow- up interviews to gain a better understanding of the societies’ undergraduate education activities. The information and analysis served as background for a national workshop in January 2017 that brought together over 80 academics and engineering society officials to discuss issues and share ideas on undergraduate engineering education. Discussions were kicked off by 22 “lightning” presentations from 14 societies highlighting their educational programs and activities. The proceedings of the workshop, Engineering Societies and Undergraduate Engineering Education, was published in late 2017. For the second phase, the project is conducting five regional meetings based on topics identified as important in the workshop. The first of these was held September 18, 2017, at the University of to explore the possibility of a competition for undergraduate students based on the NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering. Proceedings will be published in early 2018. The second in this series of meetings, scheduled for February 2018 on the campus of , will consider the role of societies in defining “impact” on the engineering profession as a criterion for assessing faculty success.

7 2017 The Supply Chain for Middle-Skill Jobs: Education, Training, and Certification Pathways In January 2015 the NAE and Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) began a project to examine coverage, effectiveness, flexibility, and coordination among the nation’s programs to prepare Americans for technically oriented, skilled jobs that demand nonroutine problem solving but do not require a baccalaureate or higher degree. Among the topics considered were gaps in coverage and market failures in this part of the labor market, public and private sector roles in financing and providing employment training and skills certification, and incentives and information for individuals to improve their work skills. The project committee, cochaired by former US Senator Jeff Bingaman and NAE member Katharine Frase (IBM, ret.), published its consensus report, Building America’s Skilled Technical Workforce, in May 2017. The project ended the year with two follow-on workshops, on “The Role of Digital Tutors” (October 26) and “Fostering Worker Mobility and Apprenticeships for a Skilled Technical Workforce” (December 12). Presenters’ slides from the two workshops are available at http://sites.nationalacademies.org/PGA/STEP/.

Engineering Technology Education

PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM The report of the NAE Committee on Engineering Technology Education was published in February 2017. The product of a two-year NSF- funded project, it examines two- and four-year degree programs in this important but often overlooked segment of the technical workforce. The project’s data collection efforts included two national surveys: one of engineering technology educators and the other of employers of people with engineering technology degrees. The report’s findings and recommendations address the nature of engineering technology and public awareness of the field; issues related to supply and demand; educational and employment pathways; and needs related to data collection and analysis. An informational briefing on the report, under the auspices of the House Manufacturing Caucus, was held in March, and articles addressing engineering technology appeared in the summer 2017 issue of The Bridge. The 14-member study committee was cochaired by NAE members Katharine Frase (IBM, ret.) and Ron Latanision (Exponent, Inc.). PreK–12 Engineering Education

LinkEngineering LinkEngineering, a website intended to support implementation of engineering in preK–12 education, launched publicly in August 2015 and has grown to over 1,100 registered users, with an average of 2,000 visits per month. The project, which began in late 2013, is funded by Chevron Corp. and overseen by a 21-member NAE committee, including NAE members Bonnie Dunbar, University of Houston, and Jackie Gish, Northrop Grumman (ret.). In addition, five national partner organizations—Achieve, Inc., National Science Teachers Association, American Society for Engineering Education, International Technology and Engineering Educators Association, and Council of State Science Supervisors—enhance the site’s reach by promoting it to their members and sharing its content. In 2017 LinkEngineering launched a collaboration with TeachEngineering that allows visitors to that website to share their experiences with lessons and activities on LinkEngineering.

8 NAE Educator Capacity Building in PreK–12 Engineering Education The NAE, in collaboration with the Board on Science Education of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, is leading a consensus study to (1) determine what is known from the published literature about the preparation of preK–12 educators to teach about engineering, identifying areas of promising practice as well as areas in need of further research; (2) catalogue US pre- and in-service programs that support the preparation and professional development of preK–12 engineering educators, describing the nature (e.g., curriculum) and history of the programs and, if known, the number of educators reached and evidence of impact (e.g., on individual teaching practice and on the implementation of preK–12 engineering education locally, regionally, or nationally); (3) review formal (e.g., state certification) and informal (e.g., “badging”) mechanisms that are or might be used to recognize expertise and support career pathway options for preK–12 teachers of engineering, noting practical and policy impediments and how they might be addressed; and (4) explore the potential for the postsecondary education community, including but not limited to 4-year engineering and engineering technology programs, to take a more active role the preparation of teachers of preK–12 engineering. The committee is chaired by NAE member Ellen Kullman (E.I. du Pont de Nemours, ret.), and NAE member Diran Apelian (Worcester Polytechnic Institute) serves on the committee. The consensus report will be published and disseminated in 2018. REPORTS PROGRAM Media Relations

The NAE media relations office handled inquiries from around the world in 2017 and actively pitched NAE-related stories, awards, and other engineering-related topics. Media placements featuring the NAE appeared in a variety of outlets, ranging from the Huffington Post to Science Daily to Worcester (Mass.) Magazine to Science magazine. NAE Communications Director Randy Atkins continued his weekly “Engineering Innovation” reports on the all-news radio station WTOP-FM (the most listened-to radio station in the Washington, DC region) and Federal News Radio. The reports can also be heard on the NSF’s Science360 radio site. The NAE features these reports on its own website (www.nae.edu/ radio), and podcasts of the radio stories are available to millions of subscribers via iTunes. The NAE continues to strengthen its use of social media, engaging the public and building awareness of engineering through frequent tweets and updates. NAE tweets are also sent to media, corporate partners, and universities to help spread the word about engineering and NAE activities. The NAE “Spotlight on Engineering” e-newsletter provides information on engineering and activities of the broader National Academies, engineering news from around the world, special events, and other items of interest to thousands of subscribers. A new section in “Spotlight” focuses solely on advances and updates in the realm of the 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering, to continue to promote awareness of these important challenges.

9 2017 Grand Challenges for Engineering

The number of activities inspired by the NAE’s Grand Challenges for Engineering (14 goals for the 21st century outlined in an influential 2008 NAE report) continues to grow, particularly in education. Two of the NAE’s main initiatives in this area are the NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) and the Global Grand Challenges Summit series.

NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program The GCSP is a combined curricular, cocurricular, and extracurricular program with five competencies that are designed to prepare the next generation of students to address the major challenges facing society in this century. Each institution creates its own approach to inculcate the competencies, approved by the GCSP steering committee. GCSPs have been established at 53 universities around the world—47 in the United States and 6 abroad. The number of universities with an active program grew rapidly in 2017, and more than 80 universities are developing new GCSPs. The NAE GCSP Network Office was established this year, headed by B.L. (Rama) Ramakrishna.

PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM Professor Ramakrishna was director of ’s Grand Challenges Scholars Program (2009–13) and later a member of the humanitarian engineering faculty. He “retired” from ASU in 2016 and was hired by the NAE as director of the GCSP Network Office. The primary goal of the office is to facilitate the continued growth of the GCSP by encouraging and supporting partnerships between institutions with GCSPs; enhancing appreciation for the GCSP among students, employers, faculty, and the public; and growing the network of active GCSPs. The second annual meeting of the GCSP, on November 28, brought together scholars and educators from schools across the nation and world to discuss how to continue to build the GCSP community, engage with stakeholders, and grow the movement both nationally and internationally. Participants from over 35 institutions shared best practices from their experiences running the program at their institutions, explored creative ways for students and faculty from different institutions to collaborate, and developed strategies for partnerships with industry and aligned groups and for engaging alumni. The meeting was attended by an additional 35 institutions that are actively seeking to launch the GCSP. In addition, more than a dozen companies sent representatives to explore ways to engage with the program. The meeting catalyzed the international adoption of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program and helped to pave the way for broadening and deepening the impact of this visionary program. To further inspire the global embrace of the GCSP, the NAE held workshops in China and India. The meeting in , during the week of October 16, was attended by faculty and administrators from Peking University, , Beihang University, and Beijing Jiaotong University, all of which sent representatives to participate in the GCSP annual meeting. Both Peking University and Beihang University submitted successful proposals and are now members of the GCSP consortium. The workshop in Bangalore on December 14 was organized in partnership with the University of Southern California and Virginia Tech and attracted participants from more than 30 institutions and 6 corporations. The goal was to engage with leading engineering institutions and employers across India to discuss how best to educate the next generation of engineers who will be called on to solve major challenges relevant to India and the world. The meeting participants embraced a shared vision for educating the 21st century global engineer, and several pledged to create a GCSP at their institutions. The participants had the opportunity to

10 NAE share experiences with similar educational innovations at their institutions, bring out the industry perspective on workforce development, discuss challenges for integration and implementation of the GCSP across India, identify barriers for institutionalization and creative ways of surmounting those barriers, explore mechanisms and platforms to collaborate, and develop strategies for partnerships between academia, industry, and aligned groups. Global Grand Challenges Summit On July 18–20, 2017, the third and largest Global Grand Challenges Summit (GGCS), jointly organized by the US National Academy of Engineering (NAE), UK Royal Academy of Engineering (RAE), and Chinese Academy of Engineering (CAE), was held in Washington, DC on the campus of George Washington University. Nearly 900 people attended, half of them undergraduate or graduate students. Based on the NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering, the GGCS series aims to illuminate and explore the status and prospects of engineering efforts related to the Grand Challenges, to inspire the next generation of change makers to engage the Grand Challenges, and to spark global collaborations that lead to innovative ways of addressing these critically important engineering challenges and opportunities. The previous summits were held in London in 2013 and Beijing in 2015. PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM The 2017 GGCS focused on selected themes of the NAE Grand Challenges—sustainability, health, and joy of living—as well as education and public engagement. Workshops explored virtual reality and artificial intelligence, engineering and health care, sustainability, and reverse engineering the brain. The summit also included a brainstorming session on how to further the Grand Challenges movement. The summit presented world-class speakers, including the following: As keynote speakers: Alec Broers, member, UK House of Lords and original member of the NAE Grand Challenges Committee Deng Zhonghan, cofounder, chair, and CEO, Vimicro Martha Lane Fox, entrepreneur, member, UK House of Lords Rajiv Shah, president, Rockefeller Foundation On virtual reality: Michael Abrash, chief scientist, Oculus

On artificial intelligence: JULY 18 – 20, 2017 / WASHINGTON, DC Jeffrey Dean, senior fellow, Google On the interplay of engineering and health care: Sally Davies, chief medical officer, United Kingdom Molly Stevens, professor, biomedical materials and regenerative medicine, Imperial College London PROGRAM On sustainability: Ding Yihui, senior advisor, China Meteorological Administration Wu Zhiqiang, vice president, On reverse engineering the brain: Christof Koch, president and CSO, Allen Institute for Brain Science Rikky Muller, cofounder, Cortera Neurotechnologies; assistant professor, and computer science, UC Berkeley On public engagement: Deanne Bell, founder and CEO, Future Engineers; host, CNBC’s “Make Me a Millionaire Inventor” Tim Kaine, US Senator (D-VA) Dean Kamen, inventor, entrepreneur, and founder, FIRST Robotics Video of the speakers’ presentations is available on the NAE’s YouTube page. 11 2017 A panel of recently graduated GCSP students described the successes of their individual experiences in the program. In another panel, on use of the Grand Challenges in the curriculum at High School (Alexandria, Virginia), the speakers observed that the Grand Challenges concept provides a context to help secondary school students understand the value of pursuing a STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) education. On July 18 five teams of undergraduate students, of about five students each, from the three host countries competed in a Student Business Model Competition, presenting ideas and business models for addressing one or more of the Grand Challenges. The students competed for a first place prize of $25,000, won by a team from the University of California, San Diego; second place, $15,000, won by a team from Bournemouth University; and third place, $10,000, won by a team from Shanghai University. The summit also included an opportunity for university students to present posters related to research on the NAE’s 14 Grand Challenges for Engineering. Undergraduate and graduate winners were chosen in three categories—originality, impact, and design—and received $2,000 each. The undergraduate winners included one from each country; all but one of the graduate poster presenters and all the winners were from the United States. PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM A student activity, “How to Change the World,” conducted in collaboration with the RAE and University College London, enabled attending students to team with those from other schools or countries to produce a podcast, based on their experiences at the summit, about how engineering can improve health, security, sustainability, or joy of living. The students met during and immediately after the summit to work on their podcasts and get advice from engineering mentors. The podcasts were evaluated by a judging panel and the winner, an engineering student at the University of Virginia, received an all-expenses-paid trip to the next GGCS, in London in 2019. In addition, the summit was held in conjunction with the inaugural FIRST Global robotics competition at DAR Constitution Hall in Washington. Teams of high school students from nearly 160 countries competed in a contest based on the NAE Grand Challenge to “provide access to clean water.” The 2017 summit was generously supported by Lockheed Martin Corporation, the Boeing Company, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Shell. Students met with representatives of the sponsors at an evening networking event where they were able to try out virtual reality goggles, augmented reality gadgets, and flight simulators, play challenging games, and have their resumes reviewed. Center for Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES)

In 2017 the CEES Advisory Group (AG) and individual members participated in planning and oversight for the center and its projects. CEES chair Gerald Galloway (NAE) led planning and selection sessions for the Workshop on Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Ethics in the Development of Engineers. The Joint Advisory Group (JAG) for the Online Ethics Center (OEC), led by John Ahearne (NAE) and W. Carl Lineberger (NAS), met with staff and OEC editorial board leaders to review the OEC expansion project’s fourth-year activities, consider next steps, and develop its oversight report to NSF. Following are reports of CEES’ major activities.

12 NAE Becoming the Online Resource Center for Ethics in Engineering and Science The NAE OEC is a repository of resources on science, engineering, and research ethics that help engineers, scientists, scholars, educators, students, and interested citizens understand and address ethically significant topics and problems that arise in the practice and results of science and engineering. With funds in NSF cooperative agreement 1355547 that began in 2014, the OEC has been transforming into the go-to online source of resources and support to address questions on ethics and ethics education in both science and engineering. The fourth project year (2017) saw significant functional enhancements, content expansion, new online resource submission and review forms, and a plan for sustainability of the site. NAE staff helped to plan and host an international experts meeting and expanded the site’s science-related materials by adding NAP reports with information relevant to ethics. Also among the site improvements are subject aids that provide brief introductions to topics, annotated bibliographies for the topical terms on the site, and an OEC newsletter. OEC efforts are guided by a diverse, interdisciplinary project advisory group and subject editors, assisted by three partner organizations: the Center for the Study of Ethics in the Professions at

Illinois Institute of Technology; the Center for Biology and Society at Arizona State University; and REPORTS PROGRAM the Center for Science, Ethics, & Public Policy at the .

Workshop on Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Ethics in the Development of Engineers This NSF-funded workshop focused on addressing obstacles, identifying solutions, and developing institutional plans for effectively incorporating ethics into the curriculum and culture of engineering education. The workshop, held January 10–12, convened 16 invited interdisciplinary teams from 15 universities as well as other current and emerging leaders in ethics and engineering who are working to improve the ethical development of engineering students. It was modeled on the NAE Frontiers of Engineering Education program to allow attendees to share their work, experiences, and lessons learned; discuss strategies for overcoming institutional and cultural challenges; and develop plans and collaborations for advancing efforts to infuse ethics into the development of engineers. Attendees had both informal and guided opportunities to strategize and develop plans for incorporating ethics in engineering curricula, heard from expert panels, and developed postworkshop plans of action. The information, expertise, mentoring, and facilitated discussions and collaboration at the workshop were designed to help attendees advance their work and develop effective plans for their own institutions. The resulting proceedings was published in June.

Integrated Network for Social Sustainability CEES continues to assist the University of North Carolina–Charlotte with development of the Integrated Network for Social Sustainability (INSS), a network of researchers and practitioners who investigate and promote public activities about social sustainability and sustainable development. The fifth annual INSS meeting, on “Smart, Connected Communities,” was held June 6–7, 2017, in three US cities (Atlanta, Baltimore, and Charlotte) and Lima, Peru, with simultaneous online access and coordination. The Baltimore meeting examined how smart technologies can improve urban sustainability and address maldistribution of resources; its agenda was developed by a planning group consisting of CEES advisory group member William Kelly (George Mason

13 2017 University), Gerrit Knaap (National Center for Smart Growth at the University of Maryland, College Park), and Tylis Cooper (University of Baltimore). More information about CEES and INSS is available at https://www.nae.edu/Activities/Projects/CEES/57196/INSS.aspx. Planning is under way for the sixth annual meeting, June 7–8, 2018. Diversity of the Engineering Workforce

EngineerGirl Program EngineerGirl is the NAE’s signature outreach vehicle for girls. It is designed to engage girls (particularly those in middle school), inspire them to learn about how engineers change the world, connect them with female engineering role models, and motivate them to consider an engineering education and career. The EngineerGirl website (www.EngineerGirl.org) was launched in 2001 as a project of the Committee on the Diversity of the Engineering Workforce and redesigned and updated for a modern audience in 2012. In 2017 the site logged over 40,000 unique visits and 47,000 sessions per month. EngineerGirl hosts a number of ongoing programs to provide answers and information for PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM students. In 2017 a new organizations directory was launched to feature the varied and exciting places where engineers work. In addition, 23 new profiles of practicing engineers were added to the Directory of Women Engineers, and 155 new answers to questions were posted in the Ask an Engineer section, where students and other website visitors can ask questions of practicing engineers.

14 NAE Besides supporting numerous dynamic resources for students, EngineerGirl hosts an annual writing contest that encourages students in grades 3–12 to explore how engineers impact the world. The 2017 contest topic was “engineering and animals,” for which students were asked to pick an animal ranked by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as vulnerable, endangered, or critically endangered and write about how engineering might improve life for that species. The contest received 817 entries from 39 states and the District of Columbia as well as 7 foreign countries. First, second, and third prizewinners were selected for each of three grade categories (grades 3–5, 6–8, and 9–12). The winners received monetary prizes and certificates, and the winning essays are available online at www.EngineerGirl.org/2017Winners.aspx. Students around the world turn to EngineerGirl for information and advice about engineering careers. Feedback from a survey of participants in the 2017 writing competition indicates that visiting the website and participating in the contest are both considered valuable activities by most students, and that the website does have a positive effect on its intended target of K–12 girls. As in past years, over 80 percent of students (and more girls than boys) indicated that the contest or website helped them learn something or changed their views of engineering. And among the 325 girls and 151 boys who responded, boys (48 percent) were more likely than girls (37 percent) to say they would like to study engineering in college, while girls (39 percent) were more likely PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM than boys (26 percent) to say that the site or contest caused them to consider an engineering career.

Frontiers of Engineering

The Frontiers of Engineering (FOE) is a symposium series that brings together emerging engineering leaders from industry, academia, and government laboratories to discuss pioneering technical work and leading-edge research in various engineering fields and industrial sectors. The goals of the symposia are to (1) introduce outstanding early-career engineers (ages 30–45) to each other and promote the establishment of contacts among the next generation of engineering leaders, and (2) facilitate collaboration and the transfer of techniques and approaches across engineering fields in order to sustain and build US innovative capacity.

15

2017 The annual US Frontiers of Engineering (US FOE) Symposium brings together approximately 100 engineers from across the country. There are also five bilateral programs: (1) German-American Frontiers of Engineering (GAFOE), in partnership with the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation; (2) Japan-America Frontiers of Engineering (JAFOE), in partnership with the Engineering Academy of Japan; (3) Indo-American Frontiers of Engineering (IAFOE, currently on hiatus), in partnership with the Indo-US Science and Technology Forum; (4) China-America Frontiers of Engineering (CAFOE), in partnership with the Chinese Academy of Engineering; and (5) EU-US Frontiers of Engineering (EU-US FOE), in partnership with the European Council of Applied Sciences, Technologies, and Engineering. Four symposia were held in 2017. The GAFOE symposium was hosted in March by GE Aviation in Cincinnati; the topics were gene editing and applications, advanced manufacturing, industry 4.0 vs. industrial internet of things, and streams of water and information: managing water supply, treatment, and delivery in the 21st century. The CAFOE meeting was held in June in Shanghai, with sessions on intelligent transportation, energy storage, synthetic biology, and robots in the air, sea, and in close proximity. The US FOE meeting was hosted in September by United Technologies Research Center in East Hartford, Connecticut, and it featured presentations on machines that teach themselves, energy strategies to power our future, unraveling the complexity PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM of the brain, and megatall buildings and other future places of work. In November the EU-US FOE symposium was hosted by the University of California, Davis, where the topics were technologies for space exploration, next-generation solar cells, neuroengineering, and computational imaging. FOE encourages continuing interaction among symposium participants through ongoing outreach activities. Yearly proceedings, such as Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Leading-Edge Engineering from the 2016 Symposium (published in February 2017), are sent to US FOE alumni. The FOE website (www.naefrontiers.org) includes a searchable database and directory of all FOE alumni, an FOE Community section where alumni can share news, an FOE Alumni Spotlight on participants’ research and technical work, and programs, papers, presentation slides, and video from the FOE symposia. An FOE alumni newsletter is published twice a year. The Grainger Foundation Frontiers of Engineering Grants enable further pursuit of new interdisciplinary research and technical work stimulated by the conference and support participants’ continuing interactions. In 2017 these grants were awarded to two teams of individuals who attended the 2016 US FOE meeting. Julian Rimoli (Georgia Institute of Technology) and Marco Pavone () received a grant to support research on tensegrity damping strategies for controlled hopping on small solar system bodies. Amin Karbasi () and Amit Surana (United Technologies) received a grant to explore a unified approach for saliency detection in heterogeneous temporal data. The Alexander von Humboldt Foundation also provides support for ongoing collaborations among GAFOE symposium participants. The following sponsors provided grants or in-kind support for the 2017 FOE symposia: The Grainger Foundation, GE Aviation, United Technologies Corp., University of California, Davis, National Science Foundation, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, DOD–ASDR&E Research Directorate-Laboratories Office, Microsoft Research, Cummins Inc., and individual donors.

16 NAE Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers—Gilbreth Lectures The Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers—Gilbreth Lectures, a related but independent program, selects outstanding engineers from among FOE speakers to give presentations at the NAE national meetings. In 2017 four speakers delivered Gilbreth lectures at the national meeting on February 9 in Irvine. Lars Blackmore (Space Exploration Technologies) spoke on “Autonomous Precision Landing of Space Rockets”; David Lentink (Stanford University) gave a presentation on “Avian Flight as an Inspiration for Drone Design”; Alexandre Bayen (right; University of California, Berkeley) spoke about “Distributed Learning Dynamics Convergence in Routing Games”;

and Ana Claudia Arias (University of REPORTS PROGRAM California, Berkeley) gave a talk on “The Role of Flexible Medical Devices in Health Monitoring and Diagnosis.”

Manufacturing, Design, and Innovation

Transformational changes are occurring in US-based manufacturing, design, and innovation. US manufacturing employment is significantly affected by increasing globalization and factory automation. At the same time, innovations in technologies and business models—such as additive manufacturing, advanced sensors, and “servitization”—present opportunities for new value creation. The NAE created the Manufacturing, Design, and Innovation (MDI) Initiative to understand the effects of these changes on US prosperity and employment and their implications for business practices, research, education, and public policy. The MDI Initiative published its foundational report on Making Value for America: Embracing the Future of Manufacturing, Technology, and Work in 2015, and in 2016 and 2017 undertook follow-on work to that report, as described below.

Adaptability of the Engineering and Technical Workforce In late 2016 the NAE launched a workshop project on the adaptability of the workforce, guided by an ad hoc steering committee that included NAE members Ewa Bardasz (Zual Associates in Lubrication), Nick Donofrio (IBM, ret.), and Wanda Reder (S&C Electric Co.). In November 2017 more than 80 experts gathered for a workshop on “Preparing the Engineering and Technical Workforce for Adaptability and Resilience to Change,” examining a number of aspects of workforce adaptability and resilience, spanning individual, organizational, and educational factors as well as challenges facing the workforce in light of the dramatic changes in the production process. The goal of the workshop was to increase (1) awareness of the importance of workforce adaptability and (2) understanding of the definition and characteristics of adaptability. It also provided an opportunity to share best practices for fostering adaptability and to identify needs for future study and development. The proceedings of the workshop will be published in early 2018.

17 2017 A New Vision for Center-Based Engineering Research

This 21-month NSF-funded project was jointly overseen by the NAE and National Materials and Manufacturing Board. When it was initiated, NSF’s Engineering Research Center (ERC) Program had been in operation for 30 years and NSF sought fresh ideas for the program to continue to be a source of innovation, economic development, and educational excellence.

The committee report, delivered in April 2017, recommended that NSF reinvigorate the ERC concept by addressing Grand Challenge- like problems whose solutions offer the greatest benefit to society. The ERCs should use the best team-research and value-creation practices, have fewer administrative burdens, and make the investments needed to attract superb, diverse talent. To emphasize their new direction, they should get a new name, possibly

PROGRAM REPORTS PROGRAM Convergent Engineering Research Centers (CERCs). The report was briefed to NSF’s Engineering Directorate as well as ERC and Science and Technology Center directors. NSF formed a cross-divisional working group to discuss ways of implementing the report’s recommendations.

The 19-member committee was cochaired by NAE members Maxine Savitz (Honeywell, ret.) and David Walt (Tufts University). Other NAE members on the panel were Nadine Aubry (Northeastern University), Cheryl R. Blanchard (Microchips Biotech, Inc.), Robert Braun (University of Colorado), Philip M. Neches (Teradata Corp.), Richard F. Rashid (Microsoft Corp.), Shankara Sastry (University of California at Berkeley), and Yannis Yortsos (University of Southern California). NAS member Monica Olvera de la Cruz () also served on the committee.

Connector Reliability for Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Operations

The large oil spill due to the Deepwater Horizon explosion in 2010 focused attention on preventing oil releases into the ocean. Yet there have also been a number of near misses over the past 15 years due to bolt and connector failures. Although in-service fastener failures are rare and have not led to a major oil release, eliminating or reducing the possibility of such failure has become a priority for both industry and government. For a study requested and sponsored by the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Safety and Environment Enforcement (BSEE), a committee was tasked with an assessment of critical drill-through equipment fastener systems, design issues, and human-systems interactions. In the resulting report, High-Performance Bolting Technology for Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Operations, the 16-member committee, chaired by NAE member Robert Schafrik (GE Aviation, ret.), identified ideas and concepts from other industries for integration in the offshore oil and gas community to improve safety and environmental protection. The report also presents recommendations to the BSEE and the oil and gas industry that do not require regulatory action and would likely improve the reliability of subsea bolting.

18 NAE Microbiomes of the Built Environment

People spend most of their time indoors—in homes, workplaces, schools, and other buildings—­ and that time is shared with microorganisms. These microorganisms may have harmful effects, such as the growth of Legionella pneumophila in water systems or respiratory impairment associated with mold growth. But exposure to microbes may also have neutral or even beneficial impacts, such as the protection from allergies conferred by childhood exposure to pets and other animals. New molecular tools and collaborative efforts are enhancing understanding of the interactions among humans, buildings, and microbial communities, but the characteristics of “healthy” indoor environments remain largely undefined and it is not yet known how to modify indoor environments in ways that can promote human health. The report Microbiomes of the Built Environment: A Research Agenda for Indoor Microbiology, Human Health, and Buildings, released in August, assesses the state of this knowledge, identifies gaps and challenges, and outlines a research agenda in five areas: characterizing relationships among building characteristics, occupants, and microbial communities; assessing effects of exposures on health outcomes; exploring nonhealth impacts of indoor microbial communities; advancing tools and research infrastructure; and translating research into practice. Progress REPORTS PROGRAM in these areas will help make it possible to design, operate, and maintain more healthful and sustainable buildings. The study was a joint effort of the National Academies Boards on Life Sciences, on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment, and on Environmental Studies and Toxicology, the Health and Medicine Division, and the NAE. It was funded by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and National Academy of Sciences’ Cecil and Ida Green Fund. NAE member Ron Latanision (Exponent, Inc.) served on the committee, which was chaired by NAS member Joan Wennstrom Bennett (Rutgers University).

19 2017 2017 NAE AWARDS RECIPIENTS

2017 Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize

The Russ Prize is awarded in recognition of an outstanding achievement in bioengineering that improves the human condition. Presented biennially, the prize carries a $500,000 cash award and a commemorative medallion.

Adolf F. Fercher, James G. Fujimoto, Christoph K. Hitzenberger, David Huang, and Eric A. Swanson “for optical coherence tomography, leveraging creative engineering to invent imaging technology essential for preventing blindness and treating vascular and other diseases.”

Adolf F. Fercher James G. Fujimoto Christoph K. David Huang Eric A. Swanson Hitzenberger

2017 Bernard M. Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education

The Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education honors technology educators whose innovative programs have strengthened the engineering workforce by cultivating students’ leadership, creativity, and teamwork skills. The prize is presented annually and conveys a cash award of $500,000, shared between the educator(s) and the educational institution, to support continuation of the award- winning program, as well as an inscribed certificate and a commemorative medallion.

Julio M. Ottino “for an educational paradigm that merges analytical, rational left-brain skills with creative, expansive right-brain skills to develop engineering leaders – Northwestern University.”

Julio M. Ottino

20 2017 Founders Award

The Simon Ramo Founders Award is given in recognition of an NAE member or foreign member who has exemplified the ideals and principles of the NAE through professional, educational, and personal achievement and accomplishment. It is presented yearly during the NAE annual meeting, and the recipient receives an inscribed certificate and a commemorative medal.

John E. Hopcroft “for contributions to the advancement of computer science through pioneering publications, educational leadership, public service, and outstanding research.”

John E. Hopcroft

2017 Arthur M. Bueche Award

The Bueche Award honors an engineer who has been actively involved in advancing US science and technology policy, promoting US technological development, and enhancing relations between industry, government, and universities. It is presented yearly during the NAE annual meeting and the recipient receives an inscribed certificate and a commemorative medal.

Louis J. Lanzerotti “for leadership in understanding the Earth’s radiation environment and its effects on communications and space hardware, and for contributions to public policy on space-based research.”

Louis J. Lanzerotti

21 2017 NEW MEMBERS AND FOREIGN MEMBERS

In February the NAE elected 84 new members Chow, Joe H. and 22 foreign members, bringing the total Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute US membership to 2,281 and the number of Cong, Jingsheng J. foreign members to 249. Election to the National University of California, Academy of Engineering is among the highest Crocker, James H. professional distinctions accorded to an engineer. Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Academy membership honors those who have Dankberg, Mark D. made outstanding contributions to “engineering ViaSat Inc. research, practice, or education, including, where Daskin, Mark S. appropriate, significant contributions to the University of Michigan engineering literature,” and to “the pioneering Diffie, Whitfield of new and developing fields of technology, Black Ridge Technology making major advances in traditional fields Dindoruk, Birol of engineering, or developing/implementing Shell International E&P Inc. innovative approaches to engineering education.” Dogru, Ali H. Saudi Arabian Oil Company 7 NEW MEMBERS AND FOREIGN

1 A list of the newly elected members and foreign c/o Aramco Services Company 0

2 members follows, with their primary affiliation at the Ducharme, Eric H. time of the induction ceremony on October 8, 2017. Aviation Entekhabi, Dara NEW MEMBERS Institute of Technology Ewing, Rodney C. Allen, David T. Stanford University University of Texas at Austin Gerngross, Tillman U. Arruda, Ellen M. Adimab, LLC University of Michigan Giri, Jay Asphahani, Aziz I. GE Grid Solutions QuesTek Innovations, LLC Goldsmith, Andrea Boger, David V. Stanford University University of Melbourne Gray III, George (Rusty) T. Bose, Arindam Los Alamos National Laboratory AbiologicsB, LLC Guibas, Leonidas J. Bose, Bimal K. Stanford University University of Tennessee, Knoxville Gunsel, Selda Bostick, Thomas P. Royal Dutch Shell PLC retired Hammond, Paula T. Boulanger, Ross W. Massachusetts Institute of Technology University of California, Davis Hastings, Daniel E. Budnitz, Robert J. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hirschberg, Julia Cabuz, Cleopatra Honeywell Industrial Safety Holmes, William T. Ceder, Gerbrand Rutherford & Chekene, University of California, Berkeley Consulting Structural Engineers Chen, Xiangli Holmgren, Jennifer R. independent consultant LanzaTech Chong, Dianne Howell, Kathleen C. Boeing Research and Technology (retired) Purdue University

22 NAE 2 0 1 7 STV Group Servedio, Dominick M. Schlom, Darrell G. University ofColorado Boulder Scheeres, DanielJ. GE Power Schaeffer, Jon C. University ofCalifornia,Los Angeles Razavi, Behzad Pivot Engineers Randall W.Poston, Monash University Parlange, Marc B. GSI Environmental Inc. Panday, Sorab University ofCalifornia,Davis Niemeier,Deb A. Georgia Instituteof Technology S. Nemirovski, Arkadi North CarolinaStateUniversity Narayan, Jagdish Applied MaterialsInc. Nalamasu, Omkaram University ofSouthCarolina Monnier, John R. FailureExponent AnalysisAssociates Moncarz, PiotrD. National ScienceFoundation Robert W.McCabe, University ofCalifornia,Berkeley Liu, Tsu-Jae SAFECode Lipner, Steven B. GTL Associates George T.Ligler, Jennifer A. Lewis, Pacific NorthwestNationalLaboratory Leung, Ruby Facebook LeCun, YannA. The Dow ChemicalCompany Katsoulis, DimitrisE. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology Katabi, Dina InCube Labs,LLC Mir A. Imran, Northwestern University Huang, Yonggang Toner, Mehmet Carnegie MellonUniversity Tayur, Sridhar Massachusetts Instituteof Technology Strano, Michael S. WISC Partners Splinter, Michael R. Commercial Airplanes Boeing Spalart, PhilippeR. Agilent Technologies Solomon, DarleneJ. shift7 Smith, MeganJ. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology H. Slocum, Alexander Built Environment Coalition Slaughter, Sarah Peking University Zhang, Dongxiao University ofCalifornia, Berkeley Yelick,Katherine A. Rutgers University Yarmush, MartinL. Massachusetts Instituteof Technology Yannas,Ioannis V. Nokia BellLabs Winzer, Peter J. MedicalCenter andDukeUniversity Wilson, BlakeS. Lawrence Livermore NationalLaboratory Westbrook, CharlesK. State University (retired) Voight, Barry Kilovolt Consulting,Inc. Vautrinot, SuzanneM. University ofCalifornia,Los Angeles Varghese, George Applied Physics Laboratory Johns HopkinsUniversity Van Wie, David M. ISO NewEngland van Welie,Gordon Nokia BellLabs Valenzuela,Reinaldo A. North CarolinaStateUniversity Turinsky, Paul J. Massachusetts General Hospital

23

2017 NEW MEMBERS AND FOREIGN MEMBERS 2017 NEW MEMBERS AND FOREIGN MEMBERS University of TokyoUniversity Arakawa, Yasuhiko (UNAM) National Autonomous University ofMexico Alcocer, SergioM. NEW FOREIGNMEMBERS Karlsruhe Instituteof Technology (KIT) Horst W.Hahn, Université deBordeaux Hadziioannou, Georges ETH Zürich Fussenegger, Martin Corporation Honda Aircraft Fujino, Michimasa of TorontoUniversity Foster, F. Stuart Dassault Systèmes Charles, Bernard Lancaster University Beven, Keith J. International BusinessMachines Corporation Asakawa, Chieko 24 Sifakis, Joseph Microsoft Corporation Shum, Harry University ofCape Town Cyril T.O’Connor, École Mallat, Stéphane of TwenteUniversity Lohse, Detlef Technical University ofMunich Lercher,Johannes A. Universität Göttingen Kirchheim, Reiner Toyota Central R&DLabs,Inc. Kikuchi, Noboru of TokyoUniversity Kataoka, Kazunori The Electranix Corp. Woodford,Dennis A. University ofPatras Vayenas, ConstantinosG. Rolls-Royce, plc Smith, Colin Université -Alpes NormaleSupérieure NAE 2 0 1 7 Daniel Berg C. Gordon Bell Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. H. Ang Alfredo G. Anderson Arthur Betsy Ancker-Johnson R. Allen Clarence G. Agnew William Norman Abramson H. their 40thyear in2017. inboldcelebrated are Members whosenames 44 YEARS 40 TO Morris Tanenbaum Calvin F. Quate Thomas L.Phillips William J.Perry Hilliard W.Paige John J.McKetta, Jr. J. RossMacdonald Robert G.Loewy Christopher C.Kraft, Jr. James R.Johnson William J.Hall Richard J.Grosh Roy W.Gould Earnest F. Gloyna FroschRobert A. John S.Foster, Jr. Malcolm R.Currie Arthur E.Bryson R. ByronBird their 45thyear in2017. inboldcelebrated are Members whosenames 49 YEARS 45 TO Don U. Deere Harold Brown their 50thyear in2017. These memberscelebrated 50 YEARS ORMORE NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS * Deceased Fujio Matsuda Hans Mark Marcatili Enrique A. John D. Mackenzie Alan M.Lovelace Milton Levenson Gordon S.Kino* William M.Kays Paul C.Jennings Arthur E.Humphrey , Jr. John P. Hirth Joseph M.Hendrie Robert W.Hellwarth Stephen E.Harris John C.Hancock Paul E.Gray* John B. Goodenough Ralph E.Gomory James F. Gibbons Ivar Giaever Ronald L.Geer Douglas W.Fuerstenau Merton C.Flemings A.J. Field Steven J.Fenves Joseph Feinstein James L.Everett III Leo Esaki Robert M.Drake, Jr. Anthony J.DeMaria Robert C.Dean,Jr. John F. Davidson Fernando J.Corbato Robert H.Cannon,Jr.* J. Fred Bucy Norman H.Brooks Frederick P. Brooks,Jr. William B.Bridges P.L.Brian Thibaut John E.Breen Lewis M.Branscomb Andrew H.Bobeck Donald L.Bitzer Jean E.Sammet* Leslie E.Robertson Raymond F. Decker Daniel B. DeBra Jose B. Cruz,Jr. Robert C.Crooke Harvey G.Cragon Lloyd S.Cluff Donald C.Berkey Wallace B. Behnke Lionel O. Barthold Seymour Baron G. Anderson John S. Agbabian Mihran D. AchenbachJan Egil Abrahamsen their 35thyear in2017. inboldcelebrated are Members whosenames 39 YEARS 35 TO Zadeh* Lotfi A. H. WoodsonHerbert H. WertheimRobert G. WenzelJames Johannes Weertman M. WebsterWilliam John B. Wachtman, Jr. K. TienPing Ivan E.Sutherland Sozen Mete A. Ronald F. Probstein David S.Potter Robert Plunkett Jacques Peters Norman F. Parker Joseph H.Newman Gordon E.Moore Johannes Moe James K.Mitchell Gordon H.Millar Ross E.McKinney Perry L.McCarty 25

NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS John C.Fisher Thomas E.Everhart Robert R.Everett Von R.Eshleman* Elder Rex A. Peter S.Eagleson John E.Dolan * James J.Morgan Carl L.Monismith Harry W.Mergler* James D. Meindl Charles J.McMahon,Jr. William J.McCune,Jr. John S.Mayo Robert D. Maurer Robert W.Lucky William R.Lucas Edwin N.Lightfoot, Jr.* George Leitmann Griff C.Lee Henry Kressel James N.Krebs Kohler*Max A. Donald E.Knuth C. Judson King Jack L.Kerrebrock Bernard H.Kear Trevor O.Jones George W.Jeffs Irwin M.Jacobs Michel Hug Charles L.Hosler, Jr. Edward E.Hood,Jr. Kenneth E.Haughton George N.Hatsopoulos Harter George A. Dean B. Harrington Kent F. Hansen Paul E.Green,Jr. Welko E.Gasich Richard L.Garwin William J.Galloway Robert G.Gallager Theodore V.Galambos Yuan-Cheng B. Fung Deceased 26 in 2017. bold celebratedtheir30thyear in Members whosenamesare 34 YEARS 30 TO R. YoungLaurence C. YoulaDante Takeo Yokobori Theodore Y.Wu L. Wilson Gerald R.C. WestwoodAlbert R. WelchLloyd Jasper A.Welch,Jr. James Wei J. Viterbi Andrew S. Veletsos Anestis A. VandersliceThomas P.Marshall Tulin Kenneth Thompson M. TellepDaniel E. TaylorCharles George W. Swenson,Jr.* Henry E.Stone Theodore Stern John B.Slaughter Masanobu Shinozuka Paul G.Shewmon John H.Seinfeld William R.Schowalter Irwin W.Sandberg Dale F. Rudd James F. Roth Stanley T.Rolfe Lawrence G.Roberts Walter L.Robb Gustavo Rivas-Mijares Herbert H.Richardson James R.Rice John M.Prausnitz Karl S.Pister Marc J.Pelegrin PearsonJ.R. Anthony Harold W.Paxton C. Kumar N.Patel Simon Ostrach* Karl H.Norris Robert L.Byer Walter L.Brown* James E.Broadwell Klaus D. Bowers H. Kent Bowen John G.Bollinger Blenkarn Kenneth A. David P. Billington Arden L.Bement,Jr. Alexis T.Bell R. Augustine Norman S. Atal Bishnu Arthur Ashkin John A.Armstrong William A.Anders FrancesE. Allen K. Allen Dell Donald C.Fraser G. David Forney, Jr. John W.Fisher FeigenbaumEdward A. John V.Evans Richard E.Emmert Tony F. Embleton Gerard W.Elverum James Economy Eckert Charles A. Duscha Lloyd A. James M.Duncan James J.Duderstadt Robert H.Dennard Morton M.Denn F. Paul deMello James W.Dally Paul M.Cook ConwayRichard A. Robert W.Conn Philip M.Condit John L.Cleasby Robert P. Clagett Richard M.Christensen Anil K.Chopra Alfred Y.Cho Chittenden William A. Herbert S.Cheng John F. Cashen William J.Carroll NAE 2 0 1 7 * Alan L.McWhorter Robert Malpas John B. MacChesney John W.Lyons Dan Luss Joseph C.Logue* Raymond C.Loehr Benjamin Y.Liu Peter W.Likins Martin P. Lepselter John W.Leonard Shih-Ying Lee L. Gary Leal Gerald D. Laubach Kaye D. Lathrop Ronald M.Latanision Butler W.Lampson Albert S.Kobayashi Makoto Kikuchi Melvin F. Kanninen Robert E.Kahn Robert B. Jansen Erich P. Ippen Anthony J.Iorillo Iacocca Lee A. John W.Hutchinson William G.Howard, Jr. Hodges David A. Yu-Chi Ho Cyril Hilsum Hiler Edward A. Alfred J.Hendron,Jr. Adam Heller Robert C.Hawkins Robert D. Hanson Donald L.Hammond Robert S.Hahn Bacharuddin J.Habibie Hermann K.Gummel Arthur C.Gossard Joseph W.Goodman Mary L.Good Richard J.Goldstein Alastair M.Glass Ralph S.Gens Deceased Fred Sterzer Charles V.Sternling Dale F. Stein Fred I.Stalkup Ephraim M.Sparrow Ponisseril Somasundaran Smith Kenneth A. George E.Smith Merrill I.Skolnik Eugene D. Shchukin Charles V.Shank Eugene Sevin Charles D. Scott Lucien A. Schmit, Jr. John H.Schmertmann Chih-Tang Sah Della M.Roy Ronald E.Rosensweig Jerome G.Rivard Eli Reshotko Raj Reddy Lawrence R.Rabiner Michael Prats John W. Poduska, Sr. Robert Plonsey R. ByronPipes George P. Peterson Thomas K.Perkins J. RandolphPaulling Morton B. Panish Robert B.Ormsby, Jr. Alan V.Oppenheim William G.Oldham William D. Nix Robin B. Nicholson George L.Nemhauser Albert Narath Hyla S.Napadensky Nadel Norman A. Joel Moses Harold Mirels William F. Miller* Richard C.Messinger Chiang C.Mei Robert Mehrabian Mead Carver A. Peter Beardmore* Robert G.Bea Grigory I.Barenblatt William F. Ballhaus,Jr. Earl E.Bakken Donald W.Bahr H. AustonDavid F.Michael Ashby S. Argon Ali S. Araki Minoru FrankF. Aplan ThomasR. Anthony Stig A.Annestrand L. Anderson John C. Alkire Richard I. Alferov Zhores in 2017. bold celebratedtheir25thyear in Members whosenamesare 29 YEARS 25 TO Paul Zia Sheila E. Widnall Sheila Willis S. White, Jr. Jr.John A.White, Arthur W. Westerberg John F. Welch, Jr. Sheldon Weinig Vern W. Weekman,Jr. Walter J. Weber, Jr. I. WangDaniel Raymond Viskanta G. VincentiWalter L. TurinGeorge J. Themelis Nickolas D. TapleyByron L. TangChung Ben G.Streetman William D. Strecker Abe M.Zarem Eugene Wong J. Wise John L. WilsonEdward C. Williams James S. Wilczynski Janusz 27

NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS Richard E.Blahut David T.Blackstock Joel S.Birnbaum James R.Biard Betti John A. Roger H.Beteille Bekey George A. * Dean E.Eastman Robert W.Dutton Russell D. Dupuis Duke* David A. T. DixonDudderar E. LinnDraper, Jr. Elisabeth M.Drake Steven D. Dorfman Stephen W.Director Frederick H.Dill Davis Lance A. Ernest L.Daman Edward J.Cording Harry E.Cook Richard W.Conway LynnConway A. Harry M.Conger Bruce G.Collipp James M.Coleman G. WayneClough Rodney J.Clifton Jon F. Claerbout Steve S.Chen Nai Y.Chen* Ben H.Caudle Kenneth E.Case John R.Casani Robert P. Caren* James D. Callen Robert D. Burnham Browning Keith A. Brown Robert A. Alan C.Brown Robert W.Brodersen Roger W.Brockett Peter R.Bridenbaugh Brand Donald A. Geoffrey Boothroyd Deceased 28 Ellis L.Johnson James O. Jirsa Marvin E.Jensen James F. Jackson Seiuemon Inaba Izzat M.Idriss John E.Hopcroft Hoel Lester A. George J.Hirasaki Narain G.Hingorani Arthur H.Heuer Robert J.Hermann Herbst John A. John L.Hennessy Siegfried S.Hecker Michael Hatzakis Henry J.Hatch Juris Hartmanis Howard R.Hart,Jr. Robert C.Hansen Delon Hampton Keith E.Gubbins Donald P. Greenberg Paul R.Gray Bernard M.Gordon Richard E.Goodman Marvin E.Goldstein W. BarneyGogarty George J.Gleghorn Jerome B. Gilbert Thomas G.Giallorenzi David B. Geselowitz Gear C. William Elsa M.Garmire Samuel H.Fuller Judson C.French Alan B. Fowler Edith M.Flanigen Robert E.Fischell Frank F. Fang Odd M.Faltinsen Thomas V.Falkie Charles Fairhurst Charles Elachi Fredric F. Ehrich Robert J.Eaton James U.Lemke Louis J.Lanzerotti Robert S.Langer Leslie B. Lamport James Lago Roger Lacroix David J.Kuck Bernard L.Koff Robert H.Kingston Robert P. Kennedy George E.Keller II Richard M.Karp Frederick J.Karol Frank E.Karasz Charles K.Kao Frank D. Judge G. Frank Joklik James W.Mitchell Keith K.Millheim David G.Messerschmitt James C.McGroddy Eugene R.McGrath John C.McDonald Adolf D. May William C.Maurer Shiro Matsuoka James F. Mathis Robert F. Mast John L.Mason Karl E.Martersteck Robert C.Marini Anna M.Marabini Maneatis George A. Frederick J.Mancheski Thomas J.Malone Thomas L.Magnanti Albert Macovski Alexander MacLachlan Robert W.MacCormack Daniel P. Loucks Walter B. Loewenstein John D. Little Barbara H.Liskov Robert H.Liebeck Norman N.Li Johanna M.H.Levelt Sengers NAE 2 0 1 7 Robert H.Rediker W. HarmonRay Rapp Robert A. Edwin P. Przybylowicz Dennis J.Picard Donald E.Petersen Stewart D. Personick PenziasArno A. Val P. Peline Donald R.Paul Bradford W.Parkinson Ronald R.Parker Frank L.Parker Carel Otte J. TinsleyOden John H.Nuckolls Robert M.Nowak Ronald P. Nordgren J. Nicholas Newman Shlomo P. Neuman Arun N.Netravali Robert M.Nerem Stuart O. Nelson John Neerhout,Jr. Venkatesh Narayanamurti Roddam Narasimha Earll M.Murman Richard S.Muller Van C.Mow C. D. (Dan)Mote,Jr. Norbert R.Morgenstern William B.Morgan L. David Montague James E.Monsees Joe H.Mize Sanjoy K.Mitter Raymond S.Stata William J.Spencer James J.Solberg Helmut E.Sobieczky Leroy H.Smith,Jr. Henry I.Smith R. WayneSkaggs Leonard M.Silverman Arnold H.Silver Michael L.Shuler Don W.Shaw Robert R.Shannon Frank S.Settles Charles L.Seitz Laurence C.Seifert Norman R.Scott Mischa Schwartz Robert J.Schultz Frank J.Schuh Alan Schriesheim Harold N.Scherer, Jr. Maxine L.Savitz Gavriel Salvendy Elbert L.Rutan Thomas W.Russell William B. Rouse Murray W.Rosenthal Rohrer Ronald A. Roesner Larry A. Ignacio Rodriguez-Iturbe Robinson Enders A. Richard J.Robbins Ronald L.Rivest Kenneth F. Reinschmidt Cordell Reed Dianzuo Wang Irv Waaland Jeffrey D. Ullman R. TummalaRao E. TodreasNeil E. TillCharles F.Larry Thompson A. ThompsonDavid L. TaylorRobert E. TarjanRobert A. TapiaRichard Zehev Tadmor John H.Sununu Richard G.Strauch Richard S.Stein Richard J.Stegemeier Hermann Statz A. YoungJohn A. Thomas Young T.Henry Yang Jr.Loring A.Wyllie, J. Wygnanski Israel David A.Woolhiser Edgar S. Woolard, Jr. M. WoodallJerry WardO. Winer Grant Willson C. Forman A.Williams M. Wiederhorn Sheldon M. White Robert J. WeimerRobert R. WeertmanJulia William J. Ward III K. WangKuo 29

NAE ANNIVERSARY MEMBERS A Message from NAE Vice President Corale Brierley

I am thrilled to report that more than 652 members and friends of the NAE invested more than $5.3 million in new cash and pledges in 2017. Thank you!

Because of your tremendous support, the NAE was able to promote engineering to young girls who want to change the world; teachers across the country gained access to online resources in order to better educate their students in engineering; and nearly 1,000 industry

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 experts and undergraduate students from around the world convened 1 in Washington for the Third Global Grand Challenges Summit. These 0

2 and other programs are possible because of you. Corale Brierley As a nonprofit organization, the NAE relies heavily on support from its members and friends. In 2017 private philanthropic support made up nearly one third of the NAE’s annual budget and 80% was from individual donors. I am grateful for your confidence in NAE leadership. Your generosity enables the NAE to serve the engineering community, young people, policymakers, and the public.

In addition to recognizing our annual giving society donors, I am pleased to welcome new members of the Einstein Society (5), Golden Bridge Society (19), and Heritage Society (1). It is also worth noting that we once again can boast 100% giving participation from the NAE Council—this marks three years in a row! I hope you will make note of the new giving society members, and thank them and all the generous NAE donors named in the following pages.

Onward The NAE furthers its mission to advance the well-being of the nation by promoting a vibrant engineering profession and by marshalling the expertise and insights of eminent engineers to provide independent advice to the federal government on matters involving engineering and technology. Your ongoing philanthropic investment ensures a solid foundation from which to sustain important projects and spearhead inspiring new programs.

The energy and vision of our members and friends make it possible for the NAE to drive forward. Thank you for your continued support.

Corale L. Brierley

30 NAE 2017 HONOR ROLL OF DONORS

We greatly appreciate the generosity of our donors. Your contributions enhance the impact of the National Academy of Engineering’s work and support its vital role as advisor to the nation. The NAE acknowledges contributions made as personal gifts or as gifts facilitated by the donor through a donor-advised fund, matching gift program, or family foundation.

EINSTEIN SOCIETY In recognition of members and friends who have made lifetime contributions of $100,000 or more to the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine. Names in bold are NAE members. 7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 1

$10 million and above 0 2 Arnold and Mabel Beckman* Daniel E. Koshland, Jr.* James H. and Marilyn Simons Bernard M. Gordon George P. Mitchell* Fred Kavli* Raymond* and Beverly Sackler

$5 million to $9.9 million

Donald L. Bren Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Prize Dame Jillian Sackler William R. and Fund of the Russ College of Rosemary B. Hewlett* Engineering and Technology at Peter O’Donnell, Jr. Ohio University

$1 million to $4.9 million

Bruce and Betty Alberts Michael and Sheila Held* Richard L. and Richard and Rita Atkinson Ming and Eva Hsieh Hinda G. Rosenthal* Norman R. Augustine Irwin and Joan Jacobs Martine A. Rothblatt Craig and Barbara Barrett Kenneth A. Jonsson* Jack W. and Valerie Rowe Jordan* and Rhoda Baruch Tillie K. Lubin* Bernard* and Rhoda Sarnat Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. John F. McDonnell Leonard D. Schaeffer Harry E. Bovay, Jr.* The Ambrose Monell Foundation Sara Lee and Axel Schupf Harvey V. Fineberg and Gordon and Betty Moore Anthony J. Yun and Mary E. Wilson Philip and Sima Needleman Kimberly A. Bazar Cecil H. Green* Robert* and Mayari Pritzker

$500,000 to $999,999

Rose-Marie and Jack R.* Anderson Theodore Geballe Oliver E. and Gerda K. Nelson* John and Elizabeth Armstrong Penny and Bill George, Gilbert S. Omenn and Kenneth E. Behring George Family Foundation Martha A. Darling Gordon Bell William T.* and Shela and Kumar Patel Elkan R.* and Gail F. Blout Catherine Morrison Golden William J. Rutter Carson Family Charitable Trust Alexander Hollaender* Herbert A. and Charina Endowment Fund Thomas V. Jones* Dorothea P. Simon* Ralph J.* and Carol M. Cicerone Cindy and Jeong Kim Raymond S. Stata James McConnell Clark Ralph and Claire Landau* Roy and Diana Vagelos Henry David* Asta and William W. Lang* Andrew and Erna* Viterbi Richard Evans* Ruben F.* and Donna Mettler Alan M. Voorhees* Eugene Garfield Foundation Dane* and Mary Louise Miller Anonymous (1)

*Deceased 31 2017 John F. McDonnell, a member of the Presidents’ Circle since ’04, made a very generous pledge of $2 million to provide core support for the NAE’s EngineerGirl program and to pilot new activities that will expand the program’s reach, mentoring efforts, and hands-on engagement. This recent pledge is just one element of his dedicated support of the NAE, its programming, and initiatives over the years.

With a successful 40-year career in the aeronautical industry, in both engineering and management positions, John has a deep understanding of the importance of engineering. He describes it as “a universal language with teamwork at its essence, so engineers are well positioned to thrive in a global setting where the ability to work together will be

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 of increasing importance.” And he recognizes that “my engineering 1

0 background has benefited me beyond the field by equipping me with 2 John F. McDonnell the capacity to think critically and understand issues in many situations, which is central to fields like management and finance.”

John also knows that a diverse engineering workforce that better represents the world’s population is essential to the health, happiness, and safety of the individual and society. “Overall, women have been underrepresented in engineering. A better balance between men and women in the field will provide better, comprehensive solutions to global engineering challenges.”

The EngineerGirl website, launched in 2001, is part of the NAE’s commitment to both increase diversity in the engineering workforce and improve America’s technological literacy. It is recognized as a primary mechanism for bringing national attention to the exciting opportunities in engineering for girls and women, and is the #1 site for online searches of “engineering and girls.” John’s generous support is being put to good use in a variety of ways, enabling the NAE to develop and pilot the EngineerGirl Ambassadors program; create, test, and implement a hands-on engineering design challenge; hire the necessary staff to direct these new projects; continue the popular annual essay contest; and update website content to ensure its ongoing relevance and appeal.

The new Ambassadors program, to be launched in February 2018, will both connect high school girls to engineering mentors and engage them in sharing their enthusiasm for engineering design with younger students. It will thus simultaneously deepen and capitalize on the growing interest of both age groups.

The private philanthropy of individuals like John F. McDonnell provides the essential financial support that many of the NAE’s programs depend on to grow and advance engineering. We are profoundly grateful for John’s support of the NAE and its EngineerGirl program.

$250,000 to $499,999 The Agouron Institute Mary and Howard* Kehrl David E. Shaw W.O. Baker* Robin K. and Rose M. McGuire H.E. Simmons* Warren L. Batts Janet and Richard M.* Morrow Judy Swanson Elwyn and Jennifer Berlekamp Ralph S. O’Connor Ted Turner Clarence S. Coe* Kenneth H. Olsen* Leslie L. Vadasz W. Dale and Jeanne C. Compton* Ann and Michael Ramage Martha Vaughan David and Miriam Donoho Simon Ramo* Charles M.* and Jerome H.* and Anne and Walt Robb Rebecca M. Vest Barbara N. Grossman Matthew L. Rogers and Chad and Ann Holliday Swati Mylavarapu William R. Jackson* Stephen* and Anne Ryan Robert L. and Anne K. James Henry and Susan Samueli

*Deceased 32 NAE $100,000 to $249,999

Holt Ashley* Nan and Chuck Geschke Clayton Daniel and Francisco J. and Hana Ayala Jack and Linda Gill Patricia L. Mote William F. Ballhaus, Sr.* Martin E. and Lucinda Glicksman Jaya and Venky Narayanamurti Thomas D.* and Janice H. Barrow George and Christine Gloeckler Ellen and Philip Neches H.H. and Eleanor F. Barschall* Christa and Detlef Gloge Susan and Franklin M. Orr, Jr. Daniel and Frances Berg Avram Goldstein* * Diane and Norman Bernstein Robert W. Gore Charles and Doris Pankow* Bharati and Murty Bhavaraju Paul and Judy Gray Larry* and Carol Papay Chip and Belinda Blankenship Corbin Gwaltney Jack S. Parker* * John O. Hallquist Edward E. Penhoet Barry W. Boehm Margaret A. Hamburg and Allen E.* and Marilynn Puckett Arindam Bose Peter F. Brown Richard F. and Terri W. Rashid

David G. Bradley William M. Haney III * CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 Lewis M. Branscomb George and Daphne Hatsopoulos Arthur D. Riggs 1 0

Daniel Branton John L. Hennessy Ronald L. Rivest 2 Sydney Brenner Jane Hirsh Julie and Alton D. Romig, Jr. George* and Virginia Bugliarello Michael W. Hunkapiller Henry M. Rowan* Malin Burnham M. Blakeman Ingle Joseph E. and Anne P. Rowe* Ursula Burns and Lloyd Bean Richard B. Johnston, Jr. Jonathan J. Rubinstein John and Assia Cioffi Anita K. Jones Maxine L. Savitz Paul Citron and Trevor O. Jones Walter Schlup* Margaret Carlson Citron Thomas Kailath Wendy and A. James Clark* Yuet Wai and Alvera Kan David E. Shaw G. Wayne Clough Leon K. and Olga Kirchmayer* Richard P. Simmons Rosie and Stirling A.* Colgate Frederick A. Klingenstein Robert F. and Lee S. Sproull John D. Corbett* William I. Koch Georges C. St. Laurent, Jr. Ross and Stephanie Corotis Gail F. Koshland Arnold and Constance Stancell Lance and Susan Davis Jill Howell Kramer Richard J. and Roman W. DeSanctis Kent Kresa Bobby Ann Stegemeier Robert and Florence Deutsch John W. Landis* Edward C. Stone Nicholas M. Donofrio Janet and Barry Lang John and Janet Swanson Paul M. Doty* Ming-wai Lau Charlotte and Morris Tanenbaum Charles W. Duncan, Jr. Gerald and Doris Laubach Peter and Vivian Teets Ruth and Victor Dzau David M.* and Natalie Lederman James M. Tien and George and Maggie Eads Bonnie Berger and Ellen S. Weston Robert and Cornelia Eaton Frank Thomson Leighton Gary and Diane Tooker James O. Ellis, Jr. and Elisabeth Frances and George Ligler James J. Truchard Paté-Cornell Whitney and Betty MacMillan John C. Wall Dotty and Gordon Asad M., Gowhartaj, and Robert and Joan Wertheim Emanuel and Peggy Epstein Jamal Madni Robert M.* and Mavis E. White Olivia and Peter Farrell Davis L. Masten and John C. Whitehead* Michiko So* and Christopher Ireland Jean D. Wilson Lawrence Finegold Roger L. McCarthy Wm. A. Wulf Tobie and Daniel J.* Fink William W. McGuire Ken Xie George and Ann Fisher Burt and Deedee McMurtry Tachi and Leslie Yamada Robert C.* and G. William* and Ariadna Miller Adrian Zaccaria Marilyn G. Forney Ronald D. Miller Alejandro Zaffaroni* Harold K.* and Betty Forsen Stanley L. Miller* Janet and Jerry Zucker William L. and Mary Kay Friend Sanjit K. and Nandita Mitra Anonymous (2) Christopher Galvin Joe and Glenna Moore William H. and David* and Lindsay Morgenthaler Melinda F. Gates III

*Deceased 33 2017 GOLDEN BRIDGE SOCIETY In recognition of NAE members and friends who have made lifetime contributions totaling $20,000 to $99,999. Names in bold are NAE members. $75,000 to $99,999 Kristine L. Bueche Paul and Julie Kaminski Narayana and Sudha Murty Ruth A. David Rita Vaughn and Ronald and Joan Nordgren Thomas E. Everhart Theodore C.* Kennedy Robert E. Kahn Johanna M.H. Levelt Sengers

$50,000 to $74,999 Jane K. and William F. Ballhaus, Jr. Paul E. Gray* Roberto Padovani Paul F. Boulos John and Wilma Kassakian Ellen and George A.* Roberts

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 Corbett Caudill Jane and Norman N. Li Warren G. Schlinger* 1

0 William Cavanaugh Darla and George E.* Mueller Leo John* and Joanne Thomas

2 Josephine Cheng Jane and Alan R. Mulally David W. Thompson Sunlin Chou Cynthia J. and Norman A. Nadel Julia and Johannes Weertman The Crown Family John Neerhout, Jr. Sheila E. Widnall The Eleftherios Foundation Robert M. and Marilyn R. Nerem A. Thomas Young

$20,000 to $49,999 Andreas and Juana Acrivos David and Susan Daniel Evelyn L. Hu and David L. Clarke Rodney C. Adkins Jeffrey Dean J. Stuart Hunter Alice Merner Agogino Pablo G. Debenedetti Ray R. Irani Clarence R. Allen Mary and Raymond Decker Edward G.* and Naomi Jefferson Valerie and William A. Anders Tom and Bettie Deen George W. Jeffs John and Pat Anderson Elisabeth M. Drake Frank and Pam Joklik Seta and Diran Apelian E. Linn Draper, Jr. Min H. Kao Frances H. Arnold Mildred S. Dresselhaus* James R.* and Isabelle Katzer Ruth and Ken Arnold James J. Duderstadt Kathryn S. and Peter S. Kim Kamla* and Bishnu S. Atal Gerard W. Elverum Diana S. and Michael D. King Nadine Aubry and John L. Batton Stephen N. Finger Albert S. and Ken Austin Edith M. Flanigen Elizabeth M. Kobayashi Clyde and Jeanette Baker Samuel C. Florman Robert M. and William F. Banholzer G. David Forney, Jr. Pauline W. Koerner David K. Barton Douglas W. and James N. Krebs Becky and Tom Bergman Margaret P. Fuerstenau Lester C.* and Joan M. Krogh R. Byron Bird Elsa M. Garmire and Ellen J. Kullman Diane and Samuel W. Bodman Robert H. Russell Louis J. and M. Yvonne DeWolf Kathleen and H. Kent Bowen Richard L. and Lois E. Garwin Lanzerotti Corale L. Brierley Arthur and Helen Geoffrion Cato and Cynthia Laurencin James A. Brierley Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Yoon-Woo Lee Lenore and Rob Briskman Paul H. Gilbert Burn-Jeng Lin Rodney A. Brooks Eduardo D. Glandt Jack E. Little Alan C. Brown Arthur L. and Vida F. Goldstein Thomas* and Caroline Maddock Harold Brown Mary L. Good Thomas J. Malone Sigrid and Joseph W. Goodman James F. Mathis Selim A. Chacour Albert G. Greenberg Robert D. Maurer Chau-Chyun Chen Delon Hampton Dan and Dalia* Maydan Uma Chowdhry Eli Harari James C. McGroddy Joseph M. Colucci Wesley L. Harris Richard A. Meserve Rosemary L. and Janina and Siegfried Hecker James J. Mikulski Harry M. Conger Robert and Darlene Hermann Susan M. and Richard B. Miles Kay and Gary Cowger David and Susan Hodges James K. and Holly T. Mitchell Natalie W. Crawford Edward E. Hood, Jr. Duncan T. Moore Malcolm R. Currie Lee Hood and Valerie Logan Hood Van and Barbara Mow

*Deceased 34 NAE Asad M. Madni (NAE ’11) has more than 40 years of engineering experience that includes pioneering contributions to projects such as the Hubble Telescope’s Extremely Slow-Motion Servo Control System, which provides unprecedented accuracy and stability to yield remarkable images that have enhanced understanding of the universe. Since his retirement in 2006 as president/COO/CTO of BEI Technologies Inc., he has been an independent consultant and a distinguished adjunct professor at UCLA, guiding doctoral research, mentoring students, inspiring the next generation of engineers, and bringing an awareness of the NAE Grand Challenges for Engineering to university, community college, and high school students.

At his NAE induction ceremony, Dr. Madni was struck by the importance CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 1

of discretionary financial resources to (a) ensure the independence of the 0 NAE’s voice on national policy and (b) support its efforts to promote the 2 Asad M. and Taj Madni number, quality, and diversity of US engineering graduates to enhance national capacity for 21st century innovation and global competitiveness. He and his family therefore decided to sponsor two member giving challenges: the Madni Challenge for Section 7 and the Madni Challenge for Newer Members in 2012. These two challenges have inspired scores of members to support the NAE and generated more than $450,000 for the NAE Independent Fund. Most recently, Asad and his wife Taj also decided to include the NAE in their estate plans and established a charitable gift annuity (CGA) to provide long-lasting support to the academy.

Dr. Madni believes that “a professionally successful career that does not include philanthropy is an incomplete and unsatisfying one. I never forget that achieving this privilege in my profession makes it incumbent upon me and my family to give back and help guide the generation following us.”

Cherry A. Murray Kenneth and Martha Reifsnider Daniel M. Tellep Matt O’Donnell Howie Rosen and Susan Doherty James A. Trainham and Simon Ostrach* Vinod K. Sahney Linda D. Waters Claire L. Parkinson Steve* and Kathryn Sample Raymond Viskanta Arogyaswami J. Paulraj John M. Samuels, Jr. Robert and Robyn Wagoner Cathy and Paul S.* Peercy Jerry Sanders III Daniel I. Wang Lee and Bill Perry Linda S. Sanford Albert R.C. and Donald E. Petersen Robert E. and Mary L. Schafrik Jeannie Westwood Julia M. Phillips and Ronald V. Schmidt David and Tilly Whelan John A. Connor Roland W. Schmitt* Willis S. White, Jr. Dennis J. Picard Martin B. and Beatrice E. Sherwin George M. Whitesides Leonard and Alfred Z. Spector and John J. Wise Diane Fineblum Pinchuk Rhonda G. Kost Edgar S. Woolard, Jr. John W. and Susan M. Poduska David B. and Virginia H. Spencer William and Sherry Young Henry H. Rachford, Jr. Henry E. Stone Elias A. Zerhouni Srilatha and Prabhakar Raghavan Gaye and Alan Taub Anonymous (1) Joy and George* Rathmann Rosemary and George Buddy Ratner and Cheryl Cromer Tchobanglous

*Deceased 35 2017 HERITAGE SOCIETY

In recognition of members and friends who have included the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine in their estate plans or who have made some other type of planned gift to the academies. Names in bold are NAE members. Gene M.* and Marian Amdahl Richard B. Johnston, Jr. Richard J. and Bonnie B. Robbins Betsy Ancker-Johnson Anita K. Jones Eugene* and Ruth Roberts John C. Angus Jerome Kagan Julie and Alton D. Romig, Jr. John and Elizabeth Armstrong Diana S. and Michael D. King James F. Roth Norman R. Augustine Norma M. Lang Esther and Lewis* Rowland Jack D. Barchas Daniel P. Loucks Sheila A. Ryan Harrison H. and R. Duncan* and Carolyn Scheer Luce Paul R. Schimmel Catherine C. Barrett Thomas* and Caroline Maddock Stuart F. Schlossman Stanley Baum Asad M. and Gowhartaj Madni Rudi* and Sonja Schmid

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 Clyde J. Behney Pat and Jim McLaughlin Kenneth I. Shine 1

0 Elisabeth Belmont Jane Menken Robert L. Sinsheimer* 2 Daniel and Frances Berg Arno G. Motulsky* Arnold and Constance Stancell Van and Barbara Mow H. Eugene Stanley Elkan R.* and Gail F. Blout Guido Munch Rosemary A. Stevens Enriqueta C. Bond Mary O. Mundinger John and Janet Swanson Daniel Branton Philip and Sima Needleman Esther Sans Takeuchi Robert and Lillian Brent Norman F. Ness Paul and Pamela Talalay Corale L. Brierley Ronald and Joan Nordgren Walter Unger James A. Brierley Gilbert S. Omenn and John C. Wall Lenore and Rob Briskman Martha A. Darling Patricia Bray-Ward and Kristine L. Bueche Bradford W. and David C. Ward Dorit Carmelli Virgina W. Parkinson Robert and Joan Wertheim Peggy and Thomas Caskey Zack T. Pate Maw-Kuen Wu A. Ray Chamberlain Neil and Barbara Pedersen Wm. A. Wulf Linda and Frank Chisari Tilahun D. Yilma Rita K. Chow James J. Reisa, Jr. Michael and Leslee Zubkoff John A. Clements Emanuel P. Rivers Anonymous (1) D. Walter Cohen Morrel H. Cohen W. Dale Compton (NAE ’81; Stanley N. Cohen 1929–2017) and his wife Jeanne Colleen Conway-Welch Ross and Stephanie Corotis (1928–2016) were longtime Ellis and Bettsy Cowling supporters and friends of the Molly Joel Coye National Academy of Engineering. Barbara J. Culliton Dale, elected for “exceptional Malcolm R. Currie leadership in developing advanced David and Susan Daniel automotive technologies, Peter N. Devreotes Jeanne and W. Dale Compton individual achievements in Mildred S. Dresselhaus* engineering physics, and Gerard W. Elverum innovative contributions in promoting university-industry relations,” Dotty and Gordon England Emanuel and Peggy Epstein was a strong advocate on matters related to industry and engineering Tobie and Daniel J.* Fink education. He served on the NAE Council and as home secretary Robert C.* and (2000–08) and was instrumental in getting the NAE’s Frontiers of Marilyn G. Forney Engineering (FOE) program off the ground, and he and Jeanne made a William L. and Mary Kay Friend point of warmly greeting new members at annual meetings. Arthur and Helen Geoffrion As members of the Einstein and Heritage Societies, Dale and Jeanne are an Paul H. Gilbert Martin E. and Lucinda Glicksman exemplary model for current and future members through their generous George and Christine Gloeckler contributions to the NAE. They named the academy a beneficiary in their Christa and Detlef Gloge IRA, an unrestricted bequest that provides the most flexibility and helps Joseph W. Goodman secure the financial future of the NAE while honoring Dale’s and Jeanne’s Chushiro* and Yoshiko Hayashi years of dedicated service and contributions to the NAE. We deeply John G. Hildebrand and Gail D. Burd appreciate the lasting impact of their generosity. Nancy S. and Thomas S. Inui

*Deceased 36 NAE ANNUAL GIVING SOCIETIES The National Academy of Engineering gratefully acknowledges the following members and friends who made charitable contributions to the NAE, and NAE members who supported the Committee on Human Rights, a joint committee of the three academies, during 2017. The collective, private philanthropy of these individuals has a great impact on the NAE and its ability to be a national voice for engineering.

During the 2016 annual meeting, NAE chair Gordon England announced the creation of a $100,000 Chairman’s Challenge for Section 1 that he personally funded and asked others to join him in creating matching gift challenges for each section by the 2017 annual meeting. Donors who participated in the Chairman’s Challenge are noted with the # symbol. Fran Ligler, a member of the NAE Council, and her husband George pledged $100,000 in 2015 to encourage new and increased giving by Section 2 members for five years or until the $100,000 goal is †

reached. Members who participated in the Ligler Challenge are noted with the symbol. CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 1

In response to the Chairman’s Challenge, Paul Boulos gave $25,000 to fund a challenge for Section 4. 0 2 Donors who participated in the Section 4 Challenge are noted with the ◊ symbol. In response to the Chairman’s Challenge, Tom Leighton, Gordon Bell, and Bob Sproull gave $100,000 to fund a challenge for Section 5. Donors who participated in the Section 5 Challenge are noted with the Ω symbol. In response to the Chairman’s Challenge, James Truchard gave $100,000 to fund a challenge for Section 7. Donors who participated in the Section 7 Challenge are noted with the ‡ symbol.

CATALYST SOCIETY $50,000+

Chip and Belinda Blankenship Ming and Eva Hsieh Friend Arindam Bose Robin K. and Rose M. McGuire John F. McDonnell W. Dale and Jeanne C. Compton* Henry and Susan Samueli‡ Dotty and Gordon England Raymond S. Stata‡ Chad and Ann Holliday James J. Truchard

ROSETTE SOCIETY $25,000 to $49,999

Paul F. Boulos John O. Hallquist Richard F. and Terri W. Rashid Nicholas M. Donofrio‡ Bonnie Berger and David E. Shaw James O. Ellis, Jr. and Frank Thomson Leighton Richard P. Simmons Elisabeth Paté-Cornell Clayton Daniel and Patricia L. Mote Robert F. and Lee S. Sproull

CHALLENGE SOCIETY $10,000 to $24,999

John and Elizabeth ArmstrongΩ Paul and Judy Gray Ronald L. Rivest Frances H. Arnold† Michael W. Hunkapiller Julie and Alton D. Romig, Jr.# Gordon Bell J. Stuart Hunter John M. Samuels, Jr. Elwyn and Jennifer BerlekampΩ John and Wilma Kassakian Robert E. and Mary L. Schafrik Barry W. BoehmΩ Kent Kresa# Wendy and Eric SchmidtΩ Chau-Chyun Chen Ellen J. Kullman Richard J. Stegemeier Josephine Cheng Frances and George Ligler David W. Thompson Sunlin Chou‡ Narayana and Sudha MurtyΩ Adrian Zaccaria Ross and Stephanie Corotis◊ Jaya and Venky Narayanamurti‡ Ruth A. David Ronald and Joan Nordgren Friend Lance and Susan Davis Larry* and Carol Papay Cathy Peercy Olivia and Peter Farrell† Arogyaswami J. Paulraj Martin E. and Lucinda Glicksman Estate of Charles Eli Reed

# † Ω ‡ Chairman’s Challenge • Ligler Challenge • ◊Section 4 Challenge • Section 5 Challenge • Section 7 Challenge • *Deceased

37 2017 CHARTER SOCIETY $1,000 to $9,999

Linda M. Abriola Richard W. Couch, Jr. W. David Goodyear◊ Andreas and Juana Acrivos Kay and Gary Cowger Albert G. Greenberg Ilesanmi Adesida Natalie W. Crawford# Helen Greiner Rodney C. Adkins Robert L. Crippen Gary S. Grest Ronald J. Adrian James W. Dally Hermann K. Gummel‡ Kyle T. Alfriend David and Susan Daniel Eliyahou Harari Montgomery and Ann Alger L. Berkley Davis James S. Harris, Jr. John and Pat Anderson Pablo G. Debenedetti Wesley L. Harris# Alfredo H. Ang Mary and Raymond Decker William A. Hawkins III† John C. Angus Thomas F. and Anne R. Degnan Janina and Siegfried Hecker Frank F. Aplan George E. Dieter Chris T. Hendrickson Ruth and Ken Arnold Frederick H. Dill John L. HennessyΩ

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 R. Lyndon Arscott Stephen W. Director Arthur H. Heuer and Joan Hulburt 1 Aziz I. Asphahani Ali H. Dogru Urs Hölzle 0 # 2 Ken Austin Fiona M. Doyle Edward E. Hood, Jr. Wanda M. and Wade Austin Elisabeth M. Drake Lee Hood and Valerie Logan Hood Amos A. Avidan Eric H. Ducharme# John R. Howell Arthur B. Baggeroer James J. Duderstadt Evelyn L. Hu and David R. Clarke Clyde and Jeanette Baker◊ Susan T. Dumais Mir A. Imran† William F. Baker Robert and Cornelia Eaton Ray R. Irani Tamer Basar Derek Elsworth Mary Jane Irwin Steven Battel Gerard W. Elverum Irwin and Joan Jacobs Craig and Karen Benson John V. Evans‡ Wilhelmina and Stephen Jaffe Daniel and Frances Berg Robert R. Everett Leah H. Jamieson Neal S. Bergano‡ Thomas E. Everhart George W. Jeffs Becky and Tom Bergman Hans K. Fauske James O. Jirsa Bharati and Murty Bhavaraju Robert E. Fenton Barry C. Johnson Mark and Kathy Board Leroy M. Fingerson David W. Johnson, Jr. Diane and Samuel W. Bodman Bruce A. Finlayson Kristina M. Johnson‡ Mark T. Bohr Anthony E. Fiorato Michael R. Johnson◊ Rudolph Bonaparte Edith M. Flanigen Frank and Pam Joklik Lillian C. Borrone◊ Samuel C. Florman Kahle/Austin Foundation Kathleen and H. Kent Bowen Maria Flytzani-Stephanopoulos Robert E. Kahn Craig T. Bowman G. David Forney, Jr. Eric W. and Karen F. Kaler Frank Bowman Robert C.* and Marilyn G. Forney Paul and Julie Kaminski Lewis M. Branscomb Heather and Gordon Forward Melvin F. Kanninen Corale L. Brierley Katharine G. Frase James R.* and Isabelle Katzer James A. Brierley William L. and Mary Kay Friend Michael C. Kavanaugh Lenore and Rob Briskman‡ Douglas W. and Leon M. Keer Andrei Z. BroderΩ Margaret P. Fuerstenau Mary and Howard* Kehrl Alan C. Brown# Huajian Gao Chaitan Khosla and John H. Bruning Elsa M. Garmire and Susi Ebert-Khosla George* and Virginia Bugliarello◊ Robert H. Russell Diana S. and Michael D. King Jim and Ellen Burns Donald P. Gaver James L. Kirtley Antonio J. Busalacchi, Jr. Ronald L. Geer Gary J. and Susan S. Klein Wesley G. Bush# Arthur Gelb# Albert S. and François J. Castaing Arthur and Helen Geoffrion Elizabeth M. Kobayashi Corbett Caudill# Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Paul C. Kocher Gerbrand and Kristin Ceder Nan and Chuck GeschkeΩ Robert M. and Pauline W. Koerner◊ Selim A. Chacour Paul H. Gilbert Charles E. Kolb, Jr. Don B. Chaffin Bernd Girod Jindrich Kopecek Dianne Chong Eduardo D. Glandt Demetrious Koutsoftas Uma Chowdhry Earnest F. Gloyna Philip T. Krein James J. Coleman Dan M. Goebel Fikri J. Kuchuk Joseph M. Colucci Arthur L. and Vida F. Goldstein Derrick M. Kuzak Rosemary L. and Harry M. Conger Mary L. Good Louis J. and M. Yvonne Stuart L. Cooper† Joseph W. Goodman‡ DeWolf Lanzerotti

# † Ω ‡ Chairman’s Challenge • Ligler Challenge • ◊Section 4 Challenge • Section 5 Challenge • Section 7 Challenge • *Deceased

38 NAE David C. Larbalestier Stephen M. Pollock Gavin P. Towler Ronald K. Leonard H. James A. Trainham and Frederick J. Leonberger‡ Dana A. Powers Linda D. Waters Burn-Jeng Lin William F. Powers John R. Treichler‡ Steven B. Lipner William R. Pulleyblank Richard H. Truly# Helmut List Henry H. Rachford, Jr. Robert C. Turnbull Jack E. Little Srilatha and Prabhakar RaghavanΩ A. Galip Ulsoy John D.C. Little Vivian and Subbiah Ramalingam David M. Van Wie Robert G. Loewy# Doraiswami Ramkrishna Charles M.* and Rebecca M. Vest Daniel P. Loucks Buddy Ratner and Cheryl Cromer Andrew and Erna* Viterbi‡ Lester L. Lyles Wanda K. Reder Thomas H. Vonder Haar Thomas* and Caroline Maddock Kenneth and Martha Reifsnider Robert and Robyn Wagoner Arunava Majumdar Gintaras V. Reklaitis John C. Wall Henrique S. Malvar Eli Reshotko David Walt and Michele May Hans Mark# Thomas J. Richardson‡ Kuo K. Wang Ω CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 David A. Markle Richard J. and Bonnie B. Robbins John E. Warnock 1 W. Allen Marr Bernard I. Robertson Darsh T. Wasan 0 2 John L. Mason C. Paul Robinson Warren and Mary Washington Jyotirmoy Mazumder Thomas E. Romesser Sheldon Weinig Larry V. McIntire Murray W. Rosenthal David and Tilly Whelan# Kishor C. Mehta◊ Vinod K. Sahney Robert M.* and Mavis E. White Edward W. Merrill Ann B. Salamone Willis S. White, Jr. Richard A. Meserve Joseph C. Salamone Ward O. Winer Robert M. Metcalfe Jerry Sanders III Sharon L. Wood R.K. Michel Linda S. Sanford Dennis A. Woodford Susan M. and Richard B. Miles Maxine L. Savitz Edgar S. Woolard, Jr. Richard K. and Beth Miller Richard Scherrer Richard N. Wright◊ James K. and Holly T. Mitchell Jan C. Schilling Israel J. Wygnanski Duncan T. Moore John H. Schmertmann◊ Beverly and Loring Wyllie Charles W. Moorman◊ Geert W. Schmid-Schoenbein KeChang Xie William B. Morgan Ronald V. Schmidt‡ Henry T.Y. Yang# Edward and Stephanie Moses Henry G. Schwartz, Jr.◊ David D. Yao Richard S. Muller‡ Lyle H. Schwartz Michael I. Yarymovych# Cherry A. Murray Norman R. Scott William W-G. Yeh◊ Cynthia J. and Norman A. Nadel Nambirajan Seshadri Paul G. Yock Albert Narath Martin B. and Beatrice E. Sherwin Yannis C. Yortsos John Neerhout, Jr. Neil G. Siegel William and Sherry Young Robert M. and Marilyn R. Nerem Daniel P. Siewiorek Zarem Foundation Paul and Dotty Nielsen# Debra and Alexander Slocum Elias A. Zerhouni Matt O’Donnell Alvy Ray Smith Steven J. Zinkle Fran and Kwadwo Osseo-Asare Alfred Z. Spector and Ben T. Zinn Julio M. Ottino Rhonda G. Kost Mary Lou and Mark D. Zoback Roberto Padovani‡ David B. and Virginia H. Spencer Stacey I. Zones Sorab Panday Gunter Stein‡ Charles F. Zukoski Morton B. Panish Dean E. Stephan Anonymous (1) Claire L. Parkinson Gregory Stephanopoulos P. Hunter Peckham William D. Strecker Friends Celestino R. Pennoni◊ Ronald D. Sugar Rose-Marie and John H. Perepezko Virginia and Carl Sulzberger Jack R.* Anderson Thomas K. Perkins John and Janet Swanson Josephine F. Berg William J. Perry Richard M. Swanson‡ Kristine L. Bueche Kurt E. Petersen Gaye and Alan Taub Janet Frane Julia M. Phillips and Peter and Vivian Teets# Marjorie R. Friedlander John A. Connor Edwin L. Thomas Jim and Cindy Hinchman Leonard and Diane Fineblum James M. Tien and Ellen S. Weston Evelyn S. Jones Pinchuk Matthew V. Tirrell Edmund and Laura Leopold James D. Plummer Richard L. Tomasetti◊ Sara McComb and Victor L. Poirier Gary and Diane Tooker Abhi Deshmukh Chris and Barbara Poland Henrik Topsøe Toby Wolf

# † Ω ‡ Chairman’s Challenge • Ligler Challenge • ◊Section 4 Challenge • Section 5 Challenge • Section 7 Challenge • *Deceased

39 2017 CHALLENGE UPDATE

In October 2016 NAE chair Gordon England announced the creation of a $100,000 Chairman’s Challenge for Section 1 that he personally funded, and asked others to pledge their support of the NAE and fund giving challenges for their own sections. Thanks to his leadership, six more challenges were initiated. We are thrilled to report that the five challenges for 2017 met and surpassed their goals—congratulations to Sections 1, 2, 4, 5, and 7 for a successful year! Please see the graphs below for a breakdown of how these five challenges finished.

There are four new $100,000 matching challenge grants that will launch in 2018: R. Noel Longuemare has challenged Section 1, the Arindam Bose family has challenged Section 2, Chad Holliday has challenged Section 8, and the Blankenship family has challenged 7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 1 Section 12. Please visit the NAE website at www.nae.edu/giving for information about these 0 2 new matching challenges.

Chairman’s Challenge (Section 1) Expired on October 9, 2017

Goal of $100k $232,440

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000

The Fran and George Ligler Challenge (Section 2) Initiated in 2015 with a goal of raising $100k by 2019

Goal of $100k $130,119

$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000

Challenge from Paul Boulos (Section 4) Expired on October 9, 2017

Goal of $25k $116,470

$10,000 $30,000 $50,000 $70,000 $90,000 $110,000 $130,000 $150,000

Challenge from Tom Leighton, Gordon Bell, and Bob Sproull (Section 5) Expired on October 9, 2017

Goal of $100k $303,926

$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000

Challenge from James Truchard (Section 7) Expired on October 9, 2017

Goal of $100k $1.12M

$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000

40 NAE

OTHER INDIVIDUAL DONORS

Norman Abramson# Robert H. Dodds◊ Paul C. Jennings Hadi Abu-Akeel Irwin Dorros‡ Donald L. Johnson Mihran S. Agbabian◊ Earl H. Dowell# Keith P. and Cheryl A. Johnston William G. Agnew E. Linn Draper, Jr. Anita K. Jones Kevin Anderson T. Dixon Dudderar Marshall G. Jones George E. Apostolakis David A. Dzombak◊ Trevor O. Jones† Ali S. Argon Peter S. Eagleson Chanrashekhar Joshi Daniel and Monica Atkins Lewis S. Edelheit† Norman P. JouppiΩ Teresa and Harry Atwater Bruce R. Ellingwood Ahsan Kareem Donald W. Bahr Richard E. Emmert Kristina B. Katsaros Grigory I. Barenblatt Joel S. Engel‡ Pradman P. Kaul# James E. Barger Lawrence B. Evans Kenneth H. Keller 7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7

Jordan* and Rhoda Baruch S.M. Farouq Ali Marilyn and Justin Kerwin 1

Ray H. Baughman Millard and Barbara Firebaugh Noboru Kikuchi 0 Zdenek P. Bazant Robert E. Fontana‡ Timothy L. Killeen 2 Marlene and Georges Belfort Harold K.* and Betty A. Forsen Sung Wan Kim Marsha J. Berger Judson C. French Robert L. Kleinberg ‡ L.B. Freund Bernard L. Koff# Philip A. BernsteinΩ Eli Fromm Bill and Ann Koros Peter J. Bethell Theodore V. Galambos◊ John J. Koszewnik Madan M. Bhasin Zvi GalilΩ Roger B. and John R. and Pierrette G. Birge C. William GearΩ Barbara Nunn Krieger Ilan Asriel Blech Jacqueline Gish Mark H. Kryder‡ Jack L. Blumenthal Richard J. Goldstein Thomas F. Kuech Alfred Blumstein John B. Goodenough Bruce M. Lake F. Peter Boer David J. Goodman David A. Landgrebe William J. Boettinger Roy W. Gould Enrique J. Lavernia James P. Brill Paul E. Gray*‡ Edward D. LazowskaΩ Emery N. Brown Irene Greif Sidney Leibovich Harold Brown Ignacio E. Grossmann Margaret A. LeMone Howard J. Bruschi Donald J. HaderleΩ Johanna M.H. Levelt Sengers Jack E. Buffington Edward E. Hagenlocker Peter W. Likins Anne and John* Cahn Carol K. Hall Yu-Kweng M. Lin◊ A. ‡ Paula T. Hammond Kuo-Nan Liou James D. Callen Mehdi Hatamian‡ Nathan and Barbara Liskov Federico Capasso Adam Heller Andrew J. Lovinger Max W. Carbon ‡ William R. Lucas# E. Dean Carlson◊ Robert and Paula Henry Cecil Lue-Hing A. Ray Chamberlain Keith W. Hipel Mark‡ and Mary Lundstrom ‡ George J. Hirasaki Verne L. Lynn# Douglas M. Chapin Peter B. Hirsch John W. Lyons Vernon L. Chartier John P. Hirth J. Ross Macdonald‡ Young-Kai Chen‡ David‡ and Susan Hodges Alfred U. MacRae‡ Davorin D. Hrovat Jon D. Magnusson◊ Andrew R. Chraplyvy‡ James E. Hubbard# Subhash and Sushma Mahajan John L. Cleasby◊ John R. Huff William F. Marcuson III◊ Morton Collins Thomas J.R. Hughes Robert C. Marini◊ Jingsheng J. CongΩ Salim M. Ibrahim James J. Markowsky Richard A. Conway◊ Izzat M. Idriss◊ Jacob H. Masliyah Arthur J. Coury† Jeremy Isenberg David K. Matlock Alan W. Cramb Akira Ishimaru Fujio Matsuda Ernest L. Daman Tatsuo Itoh‡ Robert D. Maurer Ingrid DaubechiesΩ Andrew Jackson and William C. Maurer Tom and Bettie Deen Lillian Rankel Robert and Norah McMeeking Joseph M. DeSimone Linos J. Jacovides Terence P. McNulty Daniel W. DobberpuhlΩ Anil K. JainΩ Antonios G. Mikos

# † Ω ‡ Chairman’s Challenge • Ligler Challenge • ◊Section 4 Challenge • Section 5 Challenge • Section 7 Challenge • *Deceased

41 2017 James A. Miller Fred B. Schneider and Alan E. Willner‡ Warren F. Miller, Jr. Mimi Bussan Richard David Woods◊ Piotr D. Moncarz Jerald L. Schnoor David A. Woolhiser Carl L. Monismith William R. Schowalter Wm. A. Wulf John R. Monnier Walter J. Schrenk Eli Yablonovitch A. Stephen Morse Albert and Susan Schultz† Ajit P. Yoganathan George Muellner Mischa Schwartz‡ Les Youd Jane and Alan R. Mulally# David L. Sedlak◊ Laurence R. Young Earll M. Murman# Bal Raj Sehgal Paul Zia Devaraysamudram R. Nagaraj Robert J. Serafin Anonymous (1) R. Shankar Nair◊ F. Stan Settles David Nash Surendra P. Shah◊ Friends Alan Needleman Don W. Shaw Martha J. Bamby Stuart O. Nelson Ben A. Shneiderman Charles Barlowe

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 Arkadi S. Nemirovski Michael L. Shuler Tom Barnes and 1

0 Joseph H. Newman Arnold H. Silver Diane Rittmueller

2 William D. Nix Jack M. Sipress Leslie Bowers Karl H. Norris R. Wayne Skaggs Alan Brailsford Babatunde and Anna Ogunnaike Sarah Slaughter◊ Sydney Busch Elaine S. Oran Stuart L. Soled Susan and Hugh Catts Athanassios Z. Panagiotopoulos Soroosh Sorooshian Raymond and Lila Cohen Stavros S. Papadopulos Pol D. Spanos Ron and Patty Coolbaugh Donald R. Paul Edgar A. Starke, Jr. Craig and Lori Davis Harold W. Paxton George L. Stegemeier Betty Dyer Nicholas A. Peppas Robert L. Steigerwald Robert and Judith Eagan George M. Pharr George Stephanopoulos Evelyn Earlougher William P. Pierskalla Howard and Valerie Stone Clara K. Ellert Mark R. Pinto Richard G. Strauch Frances P. Elliott Karl S. Pister◊ Gerald B. Stringfellow Frederick Erickson John W.Ω and Susan M. Poduska Stanley C. Suboleski James D. Ettari Stephen and Linda Pope ‡ Harold and Arlene Finger Harry G. Poulos◊ Kathryn D. Sullivan Joan R. Finnie Michael Prats Yongkui Sun Catherine Fowler Ronald F. Probstein James M. Symons◊ David Frane and Charla Gabert Charles W. Pryor, Jr. Rodney J. Tabaczynski Julia E. Frane Roberta and Edwin Przybylowicz Eva Tardos Peter Frane Robert A. Pucel Daniel M. Tellep Harold Frost III Rajagopal S. Raghavan Lewis M. Terman Kimberly F. Garcia Kaushik Rajashekara Leonard K. Thomas Jenny and Michael Gilbert Ekkehard Ramm Neil E. Todreas Sharon P. Gross Robert A. Rapp Mehmet Toner† Katherine M. Haffner L. Rafael Reif Alvin Trivelpiece Edith Hampton John R. Rice John M. Undrill Crystal Harris Bruce E. Rittmann Theodore Van Duzer Sara Hart and Abe Middleton Jerome G. Rivard Suzanne M. Vautrinot Marilyn Heebner Leslie E. Robertson◊ and Harold J. Vinegar Leslie Henderson SawTeen See Irving T. Waaland# Robert Hetrick Virginia M. Rometty Wallace R. Wade Jodie L. Janowiak Arye Rosen‡ Steven J. WallachΩ Roger and Dolores Kiel Howie Rosen and Susan Doherty John D. Warner# Jamie M. Killorin Kenneth M. Rosen Michael S. WatermanΩ Estella Kohler Hans T. Rossby John T. and Diane M. Watson Joan Kripke William B. Rouse Robert J. Weimer Ethel Lagos Eli Ruckenstein Sheldon Weinbaum† Sally F.H. Levinson B. Don and Becky Russell Chris and Fran Whipple Lois B. MacPherson-McCready Peter W. Sauer Robert M. White Steven E. Mansbach Robert F. Sawyer J. Turner Whitted Michael Mariottini George W. Scherer Janusz S. Wilczynski‡ Barbara Mason

# † Ω ‡ Chairman’s Challenge • Ligler Challenge • ◊Section 4 Challenge • Section 5 Challenge • Section 7 Challenge • *Deceased

42 NAE Gymme O. Miele Gail Prete Elizabeth W. Toor Michele H. Miller Gayle Prete Marianne Tropp and Joanne Morse Angela Puertas Chris Loughner Michael Murphy and Bryan Quigley Robert Truitt Karen Gundersen Cecilia Schlesinger Kelly Tufts Radka Z. Nebesky John and Elizabeth Schneider Reha Uzsoy Shawn Neil John Schwartzman Maureen Ward Kristina Novick Leroy Schwartzman Rhoda A.M. Weisz Andrew Oakley Janet Shanks Earnesto Williams Colm and Kumi O’Cinneide Edward Sickafus Sallie O’Neill Verna W. Spinrad

TRIBUTES 7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7

In Memory of Jordan Baruch – Rhoda Baruch 1

In Memory of Robert R. Berg – Josephine F. Berg 0 In Memory of Gary L. Borman – Roger B. and Barbara Nunn Krieger 2 In Memory of Arthur Bueche – Kristine L. Bueche In Memory of George Bugliarello – Virginia Bugliarello In Memory of W. Dale and Jeanne C. Compton – Martha J. Bamby, Charles Barlowe, Tom Barnes and Diane Rittmueller, Alan Brailsford, Susan and Hugh Catts, Raymond and Lila Cohen, Ron and Patty Coolbaugh, Craig and Lori Davis, David Frane and Charla Gabert, Julia E. Frane, Peter Frane, Kimberly F. Garcia, Jenny and Michael Gilbert, Katherine M. Haffner, Sara Hart and Abe Middleton, Leslie Henderson, Robert Hetrick, Joan Kripke, Edmund and Laura Leopold, Mark and Mary Lundstrom, Lois B. MacPherson- McCready, Steven E. Mansbach, Michael Mariottini, Sara McComb and Abhi Deshmukh, Colm and Kumi O’Cinneide, Gail Prete, Gayle Prete, Maxine L. Savitz, John and Elizabeth Schneider, Edward Sickafus, Robert Truitt, Kelly Tufts, Reha Uzsoy, Henry T.Y. Yang In Memory of Robert Earlougher – Evelyn Earlougher In Memory of Harry and Norma Fineblum – Leonard Pinchuk In Memory of Harold K. Forsen – Betty A. Forsen In Memory of Sheldon K. Friedlander – Marjorie R. Friedlander In Memory of Maurice Fuerstenau – Douglas W. and Margaret P. Fuerstenau In Memory of Thomas L. Hampton – Leslie Bowers, Janet Shanks In Memory of John M. Hanson – Gary J. and Susan S. Klein In Memory of Howard S. Jones Jr. – Evelyn S. Jones In Memory of Max A. Kohler – Estella Kohler, Ethel Lagos, John Schwartzman, Leroy Schwartzman In Memory of T. William Lambe – W. Allen Marr In Memory of Karen Larbalestier – David C. Larbalestier In Memory of William H. Lin – Burn-Jeng Lin In Memory of Edward A. Mason – Barbara Mason In Memory of Eric Muntz – Cecilia Schlesinger In Memory of Wesley L. Nyborg – Harold Frost III In Memory of Simon Ostrach – Angela Puertas In Memory of Paul S. Peercy – Cathy Peercy In Memory of Ernest Smerdon – Soroosh Sorooshian In Memory of Chang-Lin Tien – Arunava Majumdar In Memory of Chuck Vest – Jyotirmoy Mazumder, John W. and Susan M. Poduska, Stephen M. Pollock In Memory of Harvey A. Wagner – Arthur and Helen Geoffrion In Memory of Jack K. Wolf – Toby Wolf

In Honor of Jean Jouppi – Norman P. Jouppi In Honor of Eliza Kuckuk – Fikri J. Kuchuk In Honor of Clayton Daniel and Patricia L. Mote – Joan R. Finnie In Honor of Lisa O’Donnell – Maureen Ward In Honor of Julie and Alton D. Romig, Jr. – Robert and Judith Eagan In Honor of Henry E. Stone – Howard and Valerie Stone In Honor of President Donald Trump – Kristina Novick In Honor of Chris Weber and our future Engineer Girl – Sydney Busch

43 2017 LOYALTY SOCIETY

Recognizes members and friends who have made gifts to the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine for at least 20 years. Names in bold are NAE members.

Francois M. Abboud Nicholas M. Donofrio Joyce C. Lashof H. Norman Abramson Irwin Dorros Gerald and Doris Laubach Andreas and Juana Acrivos W.G. Ernst Judith R. Lave Bruce and Betty Alberts Harold J. Fallon Cynthia and Robert Lawrence Clarence R. Allen Gary Felsenfeld Johanna M.H. Levelt Sengers Marilynn and Charles A.* Amann Harvey V. Fineberg and Robert G. Loewy Waytt W. Anderson Mary E. Wilson Thomas* and Caroline Maddock John C. Angus Tobie and Daniel J.* Fink Anthony P. Mahowald Frank F. Aplan Samuel C. Florman Vincent T. Marchesi

7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 Edward M. Arnett G. David Forney, Jr. Hans Mark 1 Daniel L. Azarnoff Robert C.* and Marilyn G. Forney James F. Mathis 0

2 Donald W. Bahr Harold K.* and Betty Forsen Robert D. Maurer Jack D. Barchas T. Kenneth Fowler Charles A. McCallum Jeremiah A. Barondess Hans and Verena Frauenfeld Marie McCormick and Howard L. Bailit Carl Frieden Robert Blendon Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. Theodore V. Galambos Christopher F. McKee Richard E. Behrman Joseph G. Gall Gordon Bell Ronald L. Geer Peter B. Moore Leslie Z. Benet E. Peter Geiduschek Joel Moses Paul Berg Nan and Chuck Geschke Arno G. Motulsky* Kenneth I. Berns David V. Goeddel John H. Moxley III Diane and Norman Bernstein Mary L. Good Earll M. Murman Stuart Bondurant and Joseph W. Goodman Elaine and Gerald* Nadler Susan Ehringhaus Richard M. Goody Jaya and Venky Narayanamurti Marie McCormick and Ronald L. Graham Philip and Sima Needleman Robert Blendon Paul E. Gray* Robert M. and Marilyn R. Nerem Kathleen and H. Kent Bowen Shirley and Harry Gray Joseph H. Newman Lewis M. Branscomb Robert B. Griffiths Elena and Stuart Nightingale John and Sharon Brauman Michael Grossman Ronald and Joan Nordgren W.F. Brinkman Adam Heller Peter O’Donnell, Jr. Alan C. Brown Jane E. Henney and Gilbert S. Omenn and Donald D. Brown Robert Graham Martha A. Darling Harold Brown Ernest M. Henley* Gordon H. Orians Kristine L. Bueche David and Susan Hodges George W. Parshall Jack E. Buffington Frank Hole Thomas K. Perkins George*and Virginia Bugliarello Edward E. Hood, Jr. Gordon H. Pettengill William B. Carey Joseph F. Hoffman Karl S. Pister David R. and Jacklyn A. Challoner William N. Hubbard, Jr. Frank Press Purnell W. Choppin Catherine Adams Hutt and William H. Press James McConnell Clark Peter Barton Hutt Janet and Lester* Reed Eugenio Calabi André T. Jagendorf* Charles C. Richardson John L. Cleasby Robert L. and Anne K. James Jerome G. Rivard John A. Clements George W. Jeffs Maxine L. Savitz Linda Hawes Clever Paul C. Jennings R. Duncan* and Michael D. Coe James O. Jirsa Carolyn Scheer Luce Richard A. Conway Anita K. Jones Gerold L. Schiebler Max D. Cooper Richard V. Kadison Richard M. Schoen Linda A. Cozzarelli Samuel L. Katz and William R. Schowalter Pedro M. Cuatrecasas Catherine M. Wilfert F. Stan Settles Lawrence B. Curtis* Max A. Kohler* Stephen M. Shortell William H. Danforth James S. and Elinor G.A. Langer Maxine F. Singer Igor B. Dawid Louis J. and M. Yvonne Georges C. St. Laurent, Jr. Mary and Raymond Decker De Wolf Lanzerotti Raymond S. Stata Roman W. DeSanctis Lynn M. Larsen Joan A. Steitz

*Deceased 44 NAE Thomas A. Steitz George H. Trilling Herbert Weissbach Rosemary A. Stevens Alvin Trivelpiece Jasper A. Welch, Jr. Edward C. Stone Roxanne and Karl K.* Turekian Robert M.* and Mavis E. White Robert Straus Martha Vaughan Catherine M. Wilfert Lubert and Andrea Stryer Raymond Viskanta Evelyn M. Witkin F. William Studier Andrew and Erna* Viterbi Owen N. Witte Norman Sutin Peter K. Vogt Gerald N. Wogan Paul and Pamela Talalay Irv Waaland Wm. A. Wulf Charlotte and Morris Tanenbaum George D. Watkins Anonymous (1) Samuel O. Thier Johannes and Julia Weertman Anita and George* Thompson Robert J. Weimer

Foundations, Corporations, and Other Organizations 7 PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS PRIVATE 7 1

In recognition of foundations, corporations, or other organizations that made gifts or grants to support the 0

National Academy of Engineering in 2017. 2

Amgen Foundation National Christian Foundation Avid Solutions Industrial Process Control Network for Good Bell Family Foundation Northrop Grumman Foundation Benevity Community Impact Fund Ohio University Foundation Bodman Family Foundation Olin College of Engineering The Boeing Company Oracle Corporation Boeing PAC Match Program Payden & Rygel Boer Family Foundation, Inc. Pennoni Family Foundation Branscomb Family Foundation PJM Interconnection Castaing Family Foundation Qualcomm, Inc. Chevron Corporation Henry M. Rowan Family Foundation, Inc. Chevron Matching Employee Funds B. Don and Becky Russell Charitable Foundation Combined Jewish Philanthropies Saint Louis Community Foundation Cummins, Inc. Samueli Foundation Dassault Systèmes The Charles Schwab Corporation Duke Energy Corporation Schwab Charitable Fund Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund Henry & Sally Schwartz Family Foundation Ford Motor Company The Seattle Foundation Forney Family Foundation Shell Oil Company GE Aviation Siegel & Family Foundation General Electric Foundation Community Foundation Goldman Sachs Philanthropy Fund The Ronald and Valerie Sugar Family Foundation Gratis Foundation T. Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Honeywell International Charity Matching TE Connectivity Employee Charitable Match Program Houston Jewish Community Foundation Triangle Community Foundation, Inc. Hsieh Family Foundation United Technologies Research Center Huff Family Foundation University of Southern California Innovative Catalytic Solutions University of Virginia Intrigal, Inc. Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program Jewish Community Foundation San Diego Weinig Foundation, Inc. W.M. Keck Foundation Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC Microsoft Corporation Zarem Foundation The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Zerhouni Family Charitable Foundation, Inc. Morgan Stanley Anonymous (1) Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Global Impact Funding Trust, Inc.

We have made every effort to list donors accurately and according to their wishes. If we have made an error, please accept our apologies and contact the Development Office at 202.334.2431 or [email protected] so we can correct our records.

*Deceased 45 2017 46 NAE 2017 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND December 31, 2017 and 2016

Independent Auditor’s Report

To the Board of Trustees National Academy of Engineering Fund Washington, D.C.

Report on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying financial statements of National Academy of Engineering Fund (the Fund), which comprise the statements of financial position as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes to the financial statements.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of National Academy of Engineering Fund as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Washington, D.C. June 12, 2017

RMS US LLP is the U.S. member firm of RSM International, a global1 network of independent audit, tax, and consulting firms. Visit rsmus.com/aboutus for more information regarding RSM US LLP and RSM International.

48 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Statements of Financial Position

49 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Statement of Activities

50 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Statement of Activities

51 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Statements of Cash Flows

52 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements

53 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

54 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

55 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

56 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

57 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

58 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

59 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

60 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

61 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

62 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

63 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

64 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

65 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

66 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

67 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

68 NAE National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

69 2017 National Academy of Engineering Fund Notes to Financial Statements (continued)

70 NAE Officers Councillors Terms expire June 30 of the year shown in parentheses. John L. Anderson (2018) Richard A. Meserve (2017) Distinguished Professor of President Emeritus, Carnegie Chair Chemical Engineering, Institution for Science Gordon R. England (2018) Institute of Technology Chair, PFP Cybersecurity; Former H. Vincent Poor (2020) President, General Dynamics Wanda M. Austin (2018) Michael Henry Strater University Fort Worth Aircraft Company President and Chief Executive Professor, (later Lockheed Corporation) Officer, The Aerospace Corporation C. Paul Robinson (2019) President President Emeritus, Sandia C. D. (Dan) Mote, Jr. (2019) Josephine Cheng (2019) National Laboratories President, National Academy Entrepreneur; Retired Vice of Engineering President, International Business Alan I. Taub (2019) Machines Corporation Retired Vice President, Global Vice President R&D, General Motors Company; Corale L. Brierley (2018) David E. Daniel (2019) Chief Technology Officer, Principal, Brierley Consulting, Deputy Chancellor, The University American Lightweight Materials LLC of Texas System Manufacturing Innovation Institute; Professor of Materials Home Secretary Katharine G. Frase (2020) Science and Engineering, College Julia M. Phillips (2020) Retired Vice President, Education of Engineering, University of Retired Vice President and Business Development, Michigan Chief Technology Officer, International Business Machines Sandia National Laboratories Corporation Richard H. Truly (2018) Retired Vice Admiral, United Foreign Secretary Anita K. Jones (2018) States Navy; Retired Director, Ruth A. David (2019) University Professor Emerita, National Renewable Energy Retired President and CEO, University of Virginia Laboratory Analytic Services Inc. Frances S. Ligler (2020) Yannis C. Yortsos (2020) Treasurer Lampe Distinguished Professor, Dean, Viterbi School of Martin B. Sherwin (2021) Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Retired Vice President, Engineering, UNC-Chapel Southern California W.R. Grace & Co. Hill and North Carolina State University Ex officio: Marcia McNutt (2022) Arunava Majumdar (2017) President, National Academy Jay Precourt Professor and Senior of Sciences Fellow, Precourt Institute for Energy, Stanford University

71 2017 Randy M. Atkins, Senior Public/ Staff Media Relations Officer NAE Publications Maggie Bartolomeo, Media Office of the President NAE publications are available Associate from the National Academies Press C. D. Mote, Jr., President Cameron Beavers, College Intern (NAP), either for purchase or as free Corale L. Brierley, Vice President (summer) downloadable PDFs at www.nap. Kelli Zingler, Assistant to the President Frazier Benya, Program Officer, edu or 800-624-6242, or from the Engineering Ethics (through National Academies Bookstore, 500 Executive Office September) Fifth Street NW, Washington, DC. Gordon R. England, Chair Elizabeth Cady, Program Officer, Alton D. Romig, Jr., Executive K–12 Engineering Education All reports can also be read online. Officer Cameron H. Fletcher, Senior Editor Lance A. Davis, Senior Advisor Penelope Gibbs, Administrative Reports from 2017 Jatryce Jackson, Administrative and Financial Associate (in alphabetical order): Assistant Rachelle Hollander, Director, Pamela Lankowski, Council Center for Engineering Ethics and Bolting Reliability for Offshore Oil Administrator Society and Natural Gas Operations Michael Holzer, Senior (NAE-NRC) Finance Office Program Assistant Building America’s Skilled Technical Martin B. Sherwin, Treasurer Sherri Hunter, Program Coordinator Workforce (NAE-NRC) Joan Zaorski, Director Janet Hunziker, Senior Program Barbara Boyd, Administrative and Officer, Frontiers of Engineering Engineering Societies and Financial Associate Kenan P. Jarboe, Senior Program Undergraduate Engineering Raymond Hart, Senior Accountant Officer, Manufacturing, Design, Education and Innovation Mary Kutruff, Financial Officer Engineering Technology Education in Maribeth Keitz, Web the United States Foreign Secretary Office Communications Manager Ruth A. David, Foreign Secretary Mary Kutruff, Financial Officer Frontiers of Engineering: Reports on Albert Manero II, Christine Leading-Edge Engineering from the Home Secretary Office Mirzayan Science & Technology 2016 Symposium Julia M. Phillips, Home Secretary Policy Graduate Fellow (winter) Increasing the Roles and Significance Michaela Curran, Director, Mary Mathias, Community Manager of Teachers in Policymaking for Membership Office (from (from November) K–12 Education: Proceedings of a August) Greg W. Pearson, Scholar, K–12 Convocation (NAE-NRC) Engineering Education and Public Memorial Tributes, Volume 21 Membership Office Understanding of Engineering Mary Lee Berger-Hughes, Director Simil L. Raghavan, Program Microbiomes of the Built (through June) Officer, EngineerGirl Environment: A Research Agenda for Michaela Curran, Director B.L. (Rama) Ramakrishna, Indoor Microbiology, Human Health, (from August) Senior Program Officer, Grand and Buildings (NAE-NRC) Challenges Scholars Program Rohaifa Al-Afrangy, Membership Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Amy Shaw, Christine Mirzayan Associate (through June) Ethics into the Development of Science & Technology Policy Caryn Cochran, Membership Engineers Associate (from July) Graduate Fellow (winter) Kim Garcia, Election Manager Darul West, Senior Program Responding to the Threat of Sea Michael Hamilton, Assistant (from August) Level Rise: Proceedings of a Forum Jason Williams, Senior Financial Membership/Elections Associate A Vision for Center-Based Assistant (through May) Ervin Pinckney, Senior Membership Engineering Research (NAE-NRC) Assistant Deborah M. Young, Program Officer, Awards The Bridge, the NAE quarterly, is available from the NAE Program Program Office Development Office Office or online at www.nae.edu/ Proctor P. Reid, Director Radka Z. Nebesky, NAE Director thebridge. A PDF version is also Carl-Gustav Anderson, Associate of Development freely accessible on the website. Program Officer Jamie Killorin, Director of Gift Planning

72 The National Academy of Sciences was established in 1863 by an Act of Congress, signed by President Lincoln, as a private, nongovernmental institution to advise the nation on issues related to science and technology. Members are elected by their peers for outstanding contributions to research. Dr. Marcia McNutt is president.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to bring the practices of engineering to advising the nation. Members are elected by their peers for extraordinary contributions to engineering. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president.

The National Academy of Medicine (formerly the Institute of Medicine) was established in 1970 under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences to advise the nation on medical and health issues. Members are elected by their peers for distinguished contributions to medicine and health. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president.

The three Academies work together as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine to provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine.

Learn more about the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine at www.national-academies.org.

Photo Credits: Page 15: GE Aviation Page 24: Cable Risdon NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING 500 Fifth Street NW Washington, DC 20001

www.nae.edu