DOCSLIB.ORG

Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed October 05, 2015 - Case No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed October 05, 2015 - Case No Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed October 05, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1472 In the Supreme Court of Ohio STATE OF OHIO ex rel. Michael T. McKibben, an Ohio Citizen Case No. 2015-1472 Relator, Original Action in Mandamus vs. OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION, MICHAEL V. DRAKE, Ohio Public Servants, Respondents. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT MICHAEL V. DRAKE’S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR’S COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Michael T. McKibben Michael J. Hendershot (#81842) 1676 Tendril Court Assistant Attorney General Columbus, Ohio 43229-1429 30 East Broad Street, 17th Floor (614) 890-3141 Columbus, Ohio 43215 [email protected] (614) 466-8980 [email protected] RELATOR, PRO SE Molly J. Bruns (#70972) Investigative Attorney Ohio Ethics Commission William Green Building 30 West Spring Street, L3 Columbus, OH 43215-2256 (614) 466.7090 [email protected] Counsel for RESPONDENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Caption ........................................................................................................................ i Request for Relief Summary .............................................................................................. iii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v Exhibits .............................................................................................................................. vi Table of Authorities ........................................................................................................... vi Tables, Figures, Other ...................................................................................................... viii Why is Michael V. Drake going to such great lengths to avoid disclosing his personal financial holdings? .......................................................1 Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss should be denied .............................................................1 First Amended Complaint for Writ of Mandamus .........................................................3 Relator’s Inspection of Records Request and Response from the Ohio Ethics Commission and Dave Yost — Auditor of State .............................................3 Relator’s Complaint to the Ohio Ethics Commission ..........................................................4 Relator’s Complaint to the Ohio Auditor of State ...............................................................4 Ohio Ethics Commission joined to this action .....................................................................4 Michael V. Drake refuses to provide information that he has a duty to disclose ................5 Public Records Act must be construed liberally in favor of broad access ...........................5 Drake agrees that stock and bond portfolio companies held in mutual funds are readily available for review, yet has not disclosed his mutual funds .........................6 Mutual funds have become a way to hide white-collar bribery ...........................................8 Drake wastes many peoples’ valuable time .........................................................................9 OEC and Sunshine Complaints prove Respondent is incorrect .........................................12 Michael V. Drake knew or should have known that his Financial Disclosure was improper ..................................................................13 No investment disclosure ........................................................................................16 No mailing address ..................................................................................................17 Ambiguous food and beverage disclosure.............................................................17 All beneficial interests should be disclosed .......................................................................18 Public persons must err on the side of disclosure, not concealment ..................................20 Drake’s omissions and false statements shifted the privilege of construing the Advisory’s mutual fund ambiguity in favor of Ohio citizens .............................21 The public must impute mischief given the withheld disclosures .....................................22 $100,000 per year Bank of the West director fees .............................................................22 University of California Irvine conflicts of interest policies .............................................22 -iii- University of California Irvine fertility clinic scandal and cover-up of the sale of human eggs and fertilized embryos .........................................................22 Charles D. Martin Relationship......................................................................................23 “46 boards of directors of public and private companies .........................................24 “Over 80 CEOs of California companies..................................................................24 Eastman Kodak (John C. Lane, Chief Investment Officer, OSU) ............................24 Engineering physics degree and five majors (physics, mathematics, chemistry, electrical engineering and business) ............24 Ford, Vistage (OSU Fisher School of Business) ......................................................24 GE (OSU College of Engineering) ...........................................................................24 Knowledge Universe (Joseph A. Steinmetz, M.O.O.C., Oracle)..............................24 Larry Ellison, Oracle (Jeffrey Wadsworth, Alex R. Fischer, Joseph A. Steinmetz, M.O.O.C.) ........................................................................24 Michael Milken, securities fraud felon .....................................................................24 Martin Ford Foundation link creates likely OSU Trustee conflicts............................24 David L. Goldwyn is a controversial public figure whose stance on fracking, for example, is of obvious interest to the citizens of Ohio .............................................26 To what degree are Ohio State’s priorities being secretly driven by Jeffrey Wadsworth, Alex R. Fischer, Michael V. Drake, Battelle, The Ford Foundation, James P. Chandler and the U.S. Department of Energy?..........................................26 Hazem Chehabi Relationship .........................................................................................27 Close association with Syrian dictator and war criminal Bashar Al-Assad..............27 James V. Mazzo Relationship .........................................................................................28 Federal indictment on 13 counts of insider trading in a medical company ..............28 Abbott Labs relationship (OSU Medical Center) .....................................................29 Microsemi relationship (Battelle, Jeffrey Wadsworth, Alex R. Fischer) .................29 Drake’s Affirmative Certifications ....................................................................................30 REQUESTS FOR RELIEF .............................................................................................31 EXHIBITS A. Notice to Parties (McKibben, M., Bruns, M.). (August 28, 2015). Sunshine Audit Complaint. David Yost, Ohio Auditor of State. B. Michael V. Drake, Form No. OEC-2013, Financial Disclosure Statement, submitted to the Ohio Ethics Commission, September 29, 2014. -iv- C. Ohio Ethics Commission, Information Sheet: Advisory Opinion No. 2011-01, Disclosure of Investments, January 13, 2011. D. Unruh-Haxton v. Regents of Univ. of Cal., 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 146 (2008), 162 Cal.App.4th 343. E. Charles D. Martin biography. Paul Merage School of Business, University of California Irvine. F. David J. Goldwyn biography. (ca. August 2009). Hillary Clinton FOIA email released by U.S. Department of State, Aug. 31, 2015. U.S. Department of State, Case No. F-2014-20439, Doc. No. C05760586, Date: 06/30/2015, ¶4 (“affiliated with the Ford Foundation”). G. Congressional Record, Senate No. 15682. (July 13, 1999). Executive Session, Department of Energy, GPO (“David L. Goldwyn, of the District of Columbia to be an Assistant Secretary of Energy (International Affairs).”). H. David L. Goldwyn email to Hillary Clinton staff. (August 26, 2009). Hillary Clinton FOIA email released by U.S. Department of State, Aug. 31, 2015. U.S. Department of State, Case No. F-2014-20439, Doc. No. C05764560, Date: 07/31/2015, ¶4 (Self-identifies title as “David L. Goldwyn, Coordinator for International Energy Affairs, S/CIEA, Room 4880, U.S. Department of State, 2201 C St., NW, Washington, DC 20520, Phone: (202) 647-8543, Fax: (202) 647-7453”) I. David L. Goldwyn online biographies: The Brookings Institution, Goldwyn Global Strategies and personal LinkedIn profile. Accessed September 2, 2015. J. Annual Report. (2014). National Academy of Engineering (NAE) [Official publication]. Accessed September 2, 2015. K. Jeffrey Wadsworth biography. The Ohio State University Board of Trustees. Accessed September 2, 2015. L. Armstrong. (August 28, 2015). Update: How Hillary Clinton and David Goldwyn sold fracking. LittleSis. See also David L. Goldwyn Conflicts Map. M. Schaefer, S. (April 5, 2012). Interfaith groups urge removal of Dr. Hazem Chehabi. The Orange County Register; See also Nouh, Y. (Mar. 22, 1012). Hazem Chehabi Is Syrian President Bashar Al-Assad’s Man in OC. OC Weekly News. N. Primack, D. (Sep. 25, 2014). Feds indict venture capitalist [James Mazzo] for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Technology R&D: Critical Trends and Issues
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 261 643 IR 011 789 TITLE Information Technology R&D: Critical Trends and Issues. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Office of Technology Assessment. REPORT NO OTA-CIT-268 PUB DATE Feb 85 NOTE 349p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) -- Viewpoints (120) -- Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC14 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Artificial Intelligence; Case Studies; *Computers; Foreign Countries; Information Networks; Information Science; *Research and Development; Research Projects; *Scientific Research; Technological Advancement; *Telecommunications IDENTIFIERS *Computer Architecture; *Fiber Optics; Software Engineering; United States ABSTRACT This Office of Technology Assessment report on the current state of research and development in the telecommunications industry in the United States examines four specific areas of research as case studies: computer architecture, artificial intelligence, fiber optics, and software engineering. It discusses the structure and orientation osome selected foreign programs as they challenge traditional U.S. 'market leadership in some areas of computers and communications. Fihally, it examines a set of issues that were raised in the course ok the study: manpower, institutional change, the new research organizations that grew out of Bell Laboratories, and the implications of trends in overall science and technology policy. Following an introduction and summary
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Report
    2008 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING THE FUTURE 1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 Program Reports 4 Engineering Education 4 Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education 6 Technological Literacy 6 Public Understanding of Engineering Developing Effective Messages Media Relations Public Relations Grand Challenges for Engineering 8 Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society 9 Diversity in the Engineering Workforce Engineer Girl! Website Engineer Your Life Project Engineering Equity Extension Service 10 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers-Gilbreth Lectures 12 Engineering and Health Care 14 Technology and Peace Building 14 Technology for a Quieter America 15 America’s Energy Future 16 Terrorism and the Electric Power-Delivery System 16 U.S.-China Cooperation on Electricity from Renewables 17 U.S.-China Symposium on Science and Technology Strategic Policy 17 Offshoring of Engineering 18 Gathering Storm Still Frames the Policy Debate 20 2008 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2008 New Members and Foreign Associates 24 2008 NAE Anniversary Members 28 2008 Private Contributions 28 Einstein Society 28 Heritage Society 29 Golden Bridge Society 29 Catalyst Society 30 Rosette Society 30 Challenge Society 30 Charter Society 31 Other Individual Donors 34 The Presidents’ Circle 34 Corporations, Foundations, and Other Organizations 35 National Academy of Engineering Fund Financial Report 37 Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants 41 Notes to Financial Statements 53 Officers 53 Councillors 54 Staff 54 NAE Publications Letter from the President Engineering is critical to meeting the fundamental challenges facing the U.S. economy in the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor Appreciation
    2018 Revenues Donor Appreciation We gratefully acknowledge the support of private contributors to the National 2018 Expenses Academy of Medicine. The collective, private philanthropy of our members and friends helps to enhance the NAM’s mission to lead, inspire innovation, and impact the health of all people. 51 2018 Donor Recognition In 2018, contributions from private donors helped the National Academy of Medicine provide expert advice to the nation, inspire bold ideas around the globe, and build leadership capacity for the future of health and health care. We are deeply grateful for the generous support. Every gift helps the NAM promote its core mission and respond to urgent priorities. Highlights from the year include: • $10.8 million in new commitments • $4.9 million for the Healthy Longevity Global Grand Challenge • $1.5 million for the Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic • 596 NAM members and friends contributed $535,120 to the Annual Fund • 29% of NAM members gave to the NAM or the Committee on Human Rights • New Einstein Society Members (cumulative giving of $100,000 or more) ▫ David Baltimore ▫ Barry and Bobbi Coller ▫ Jane Henney and Robert Graham. • New NAM Society Members (cumulative giving of $20,000) ▫ Mary and Dennis Bier ▫ Nathaniel E. David ▫ Norman and Deann Gant ▫ Sid Gilman and Carol Barbour ▫ James S. and Judith M. Marks ▫ Paul A. Offit ▫ Palmer and Susan Taylor ▫ David Walt and Michele May ▫ Myron and Linda Weisfeldt ▫ Keith R. Yamamoto Philanthropic gifts and grants make it possible for the NAM to fulfill its mission. We greatly appreciate all of the support received from our many members and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • NAM Annual Report 2019
    2019 Annual Report CONTENTS Special Insert: Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic 3 Letter from the President 5 2019–2020 Governing Council 7 Organizational Chart 8 The IOM/NAM 50th Anniversary Celebration 9 Program Highlights 10 Responding to Critical & Pressing Issues Confronting the U.S. Opioid Epidemic, 11 Promoting Clinician Well-Being & Resilience, 13 Human Germline Genome Editing, 15 Climate Change & Human Health, 16 Advising the Nation & the World on Health & Health Care Advancing Health Equity, 17 Artificial Intelligence in Health Care, 19 Understanding Heterogeneous Treatment Effects, 20 Vital Directions in Health & Health Care, 21 The Future of Nursing, 22 Leading & Inspiring for the Future Healthy Longevity Global Grand Challenge, 23 Committee on Emerging Science, Technology, & Innovation, 25 Member Highlights 26 Inaugural Election of NAM Officers, 27 Members Inducted in 2019 (Class of 2018), 28 Members Elected in 2019 (Class of 2019), 30 2019 Nobel Laureates, 33 2019 Annual Meeting, 34 In Memoriam, 36 Fellowships & Leadership Programs 37 Awards 42 Finances 47 Donor Appreciation 48 Contact Us 65 2 SPECIAL INSERT Responding to the COVID-19 Pandemic As this document entered its final stages of production, coronavirus disease (COVID-19) began to spread around the world—quickly becoming the most destructive pandemic in a century. The National Academy of Medicine quickly initiated a short-term reorientation of its existing programs to respond to the diverse and far-reaching health impacts of the pandemic, including in the areas of equity, workforce, aging, vulnerable populations, health system strengthening, and scientific and technological innovation. An “impact map” that guides the NAM’s role and priorities with regard to the COVID-19 response appears below.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 IEEE Honor Roll of Donors
    2013 Honor roll of Donors | 1 As the philanthropic arm of IEEE, the IEEE Foundation inspires the generosity of donors so it may enable IEEE programs that enhance technology access, literacy and education, and support the IEEE professional community. The IEEE foundation fulfills its purpose by: • soliciting and managing donations • recognizing the generosity of our donors • awarding grants to innovative projects of strategic importance • serving as a steward of donations that empower bright minds, recognize innovation and preserve the history of technology With support from donors all over the world, the IEEE foundation strives to be a leader in transforming lives through the power of technology and education. Table of Contents Donor Profiles 1 Leadership Perspective 14 Bimal Bose 2 2013 Year in Review 13 G&W Electric Company 4 Investing in Innovation 42 Jay Giri 6 Investing in IEEE Initiatives 43 Jay Greenberg 7 IEEE Life Members Fund 41 Michael Heyeck 8 IEEE History Center 33 Dan D. Hoolihan 9 IEEE PES Scholarship Plus 25 John Impagliazzo 10 Empowering Bright Minds 37 Susumu Kobayashi 11 Recognition of Innovation 16 William Middleton 13 IEEE Circle of Honor 35 Emerson Pugh 14 IEEE Heritage Circle 12 Lotfollah Shafai 16 IEEE Goldsmith Legacy League 23 James M. Tien 18 Leadership Donors 39 Ralph W. Wyndrum, Jr. 20 Advocate Donors 41 Honorarium Gifts 42 Tribute Gifts 44 Matching Gifts 45 IEEE Board of Directors IEEE Foundation Board of Directors IEEE Foundation Professional Staff The Honor Roll of Donors will be delivered digitally in 2015. If you would like to continue to receive the Honor Roll of Donors in its print version, please e-mail us at [email protected] or fill out and return the envelope included within.
    [Show full text]
  • Ieee-Level Awards
    IEEE-LEVEL AWARDS The IEEE currently bestows a Medal of Honor, fifteen Medals, thirty-three Technical Field Awards, two IEEE Service Awards, two Corporate Recognitions, two Prize Paper Awards, Honorary Memberships, one Scholarship, one Fellowship, and a Staff Award. The awards and their past recipients are listed below. Citations are available via the “Award Recipients with Citations” links within the information below. Nomination information for each award can be found by visiting the IEEE Awards Web page www.ieee.org/awards or by clicking on the award names below. Links are also available via the Recipient/Citation documents. MEDAL OF HONOR Ernst A. Guillemin 1961 Edward V. Appleton 1962 Award Recipients with Citations (PDF, 26 KB) John H. Hammond, Jr. 1963 George C. Southworth 1963 The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest IEEE Harold A. Wheeler 1964 award. The Medal was established in 1917 and Claude E. Shannon 1966 Charles H. Townes 1967 is awarded for an exceptional contribution or an Gordon K. Teal 1968 extraordinary career in the IEEE fields of Edward L. Ginzton 1969 interest. The IEEE Medal of Honor is the highest Dennis Gabor 1970 IEEE award. The candidate need not be a John Bardeen 1971 Jay W. Forrester 1972 member of the IEEE. The IEEE Medal of Honor Rudolf Kompfner 1973 is sponsored by the IEEE Foundation. Rudolf E. Kalman 1974 John R. Pierce 1975 E. H. Armstrong 1917 H. Earle Vaughan 1977 E. F. W. Alexanderson 1919 Robert N. Noyce 1978 Guglielmo Marconi 1920 Richard Bellman 1979 R. A. Fessenden 1921 William Shockley 1980 Lee deforest 1922 Sidney Darlington 1981 John Stone-Stone 1923 John Wilder Tukey 1982 M.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the SUPREME COURT of OHIO STATE of OHIO, Ex Rel. Michael T
    Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed September 04, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1472 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. Michael T. McKibben, Original Action in Mandamus an Ohio citizen, Relator, Case No. ____________________ vs. MICHAEL V. DRAKE, an Ohio public servant, Respondent. COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Michael T. McKibben Michael V. Drake 1676 Tendril Court 80 North Drexel Columbus, Ohio 43229-1429 Bexley, Ohio 43209-1427 (614) 890-3141 614-292-2424 [email protected] [email protected] RELATOR, PRO SE RESPONDENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Caption ........................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ ii Exhibits .............................................................................................................................. iii Table of Authorities .............................................................................................................v Ohio Cases ..................................................................................................................v California Cases ..........................................................................................................v Federal Cases ..............................................................................................................v Ohio Ethics Commission ............................................................................................v
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    2017 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING THE FUTURE 1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 NAE Strategic Plan Implementation 6 NAE Annual Meeting 6 2017 NAE Annual Meeting Forum: Autonomy on Land and Sea and in the Air and Space 7 Program Reports 7 Postsecondary Engineering Education Understanding the Engineering Education–Workforce Continuum Engagement of Engineering Societies in Undergraduate Engineering Education The Supply Chain for Middle-Skill Jobs: Education, Training, and Certification Pathways Engineering Technology Education 8 PreK–12 Engineering Education LinkEngineering Educator Capacity Building in PreK–12 Engineering Education 9 Media Relations 10 Grand Challenges for Engineering NAE Grand Challenges Scholars Program Global Grand Challenges Summit 12 Center for Engineering Ethics and Society (CEES) Becoming the Online Resource Center for Ethics in Engineering and Science Workshop on Overcoming Challenges to Infusing Ethics in the Development of Engineers Integrated Network for Social Sustainability 14 Diversity of the Engineering Workforce EngineerGirl Program 15 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers—Gilbreth Lectures 17 Manufacturing, Design, and Innovation Adaptability of the Engineering and Technical Workforce 18 A New Vision for Center-Based Engineering Research 18 Connector Reliability for Offshore Oil and Natural Gas Operations 19 Microbiomes of the Built Environment 20 2017 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2017 New Members and Foreign Members
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership Innovation Impact Annual Report 20 20
    LEADERSHIP INNOVATION ANNUAL 20 IMPACT REPORT 20 TABLE OF CONTENTS 04 Letter from the President 06 2021-2022 Governing Council 08 Organizational Chart 09 Commitment to Racial Equity 11 Program Highlights 12 RESPONDING TO CRITICAL & PRESSING ISSUES 12 / Mobilizing to Counter COVID-19 14 / Confronting the U.S. Opioid Epidemic 16 / Championing Clinician Well-Being & Resilience 18 / Human Germline Genome Editing 20 / Climate Change & Human Health 22 / Preparing for Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza 23 ADVISING THE NATION & THE WORLD ON HEALTH & HEALTH CARE 23 / NAM Leadership Consortium 28 / Advancing Health Equity 30 / Vital Directions in Health & Health Care 32 / The Future of Nursing 33 LEADING & INSPIRING FOR THE FUTURE 33 / Healthy Longevity Global Grand Challenge 35 / Committee on Emerging Science, Technology, and Innovation (CESTI) 36 / Global Health Leadership 37 / NAM Perspectives 39 Member Highlights 40 / Members Elected in 2019 43 / Members Elected in 2020 46 / 2020 Nobel Laureates 47 / 2020 Annual Meeting 49 / The IOM/NAM Anniversary Celebration 50 / In Memoriam 51 Fellowships & Leadership Programs 57 Awards 62 Finances 64 Donor Appreciation 75 Contact Us LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Responding to COVID-19 At the outset of 2020, the NAM was preparing to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the founding of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the 5th anniversary of IOM’s reconstitution as the NAM. Then, the COVID-19 global pandemic struck. By June 2021, the virus had claimed about 3.5 million lives worldwide and infected over 170 million people. Beyond creating an unprecedented health crisis, the pandemic has threatened the global economy, political stability, and social structure.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Honor Roll of Donors
    2014 Honor roll of Donors | 1 When we encourage a promising young person with a bright future, invest in a teacher or a technologist with a solution to a well-defined problem, or support a team that is prepared to tackle a significant challenge with energy, optimism and talent — a world of possibility unfolds. There is nothing more rewarding than turning ideas into action and making a difference in the world; and there is no organization more capable of delivering tangible, impactful results than IEEE. As the philanthropic arm of IEEE, the IEEE foundation inspires the generosity of donors to energize IEEE programs that improve access to technology, enhance technological literacy, and support technical education and the IEEE professional community. The IEEE foundation, a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization in the United states, fulfills its purpose by • soliciting and managing donations • recognizing the generosity of our donors • awarding grants to IEEE grassroots projects of strategic importance • supporting high impact signature Programs • serving as a steward of donations that empower bright minds, recognize innovation, preserve the history of technology, and improve the human condition. With your support, and the support of donors worldwide, the IEEE foundation strives to be a leader in transforming lives through the power of technology and education. Table of Contents Donor Profiles 1 Leadership Perspective 19 Students and Young Professionals 21 Nokia Bell Labs 2 Year in Review 20 IEEE Circle of Honor 29 Roberto Padovani 4 Grants Program 22 IEEE Goldsmith Legacy League 31 Thomas E. McDermott 6 IEEE PES Scholarship Plus Initiative 24 IEEE Heritage Circle 33 Gary Hoffman 8 IEEE Smart Village 26 Leadership Donors 35 Francis J.
    [Show full text]
  • The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING and SOCIETY
    Summer 2011 CHANGING THE CONVERSATION ABOUT ENGINEERING The BRIDGE LINKING ENGINEERING AND SOCIETY The Image Problem for Engineering: An Overview Charles M. Vest Rebranding Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities Mitch Baranowski Framework for a Coordinated Outreach Campaign Maria Ivancin Who Should Be an Engineer? Messaging as a Tool for Student Recruitment and Retention Janet L. Yowell and Jacquelyn F. Sullivan Engineering a Change in Perception: Engineer Your Life and Design Squad Marisa Wolsky Promoting the technological welfare of the nation by marshalling the knowledge and insights of eminent members of the engineering profession. The BRIDGE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING Irwin M. Jacobs, Chair Charles M. Vest, President Maxine L. Savitz, Vice President Thomas F. Budinger, Home Secretary George Bugliarello, Foreign Secretary C.D. (Dan) Mote Jr., Treasurer Managing Editor: Carol R. Arenberg Production Assistant: Penelope Gibbs The Bridge (ISSN 0737-6278) is published quarterly by the National Aca- demy of Engineering, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC. Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer 2011 Postmaster: Send address changes to The Bridge, 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20418. Papers are presented in The Bridge on the basis of general interest and time- liness. They reflect the views of the authors and not necessarily the position of the National Academy of Engineering. The Bridge is printed on recycled paper. © 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. A complete copy of The Bridge is available in PDF format at http://www.nae.edu/TheBridge. Some of the articles in this issue are also available as HTML documents and may contain links to related sources of information, multimedia files, or other content.
    [Show full text]
  • Ieee Nominations and Appointments Committee
    IEEE NOMINATIONS AND APPOINTMENTS COMMITTEE History of Service Manual 1963-2013 IEEE 445 Hoes Lane Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA TABLE OF CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPOSITION CHART . 1 IEEE STANDING COMMITTEES AND BOARDS Admission and Advancement Committee . 16 Audit Committee . 22 Awards Board . 25 Compensation Committee . 29 Conference Board . 30 Conferences Committee . 31 Corporate Communications Advisory Committee . 32 Credentials Committee . 33 Educational Activities Board . 34 Employee Benefits Committee . 38 Employee Benefits and Compensation Committee. 39 Ethics Committee . 41 Ethics and Member Conduct Committee . 42 Executive Committee . 43 Facilities Committee . 46 Fellow Committee . 47 Finance Committee . 53 Governance Committee . 56 History Committee . 57 Individual Benefits and Services Committee . 61 Information Technology Strategy Committee . 63 Infrastructure Oversight Committee . 64 Insurance Committee . 65 Investment Committee . 66 Life Member Fund Committee . 68 Life Members Committee . 70 Long Range Planning Committee . 71 Marketing and Sales Committee . 73 Meetings and Services Committee . 74 Member and Geographic Activities Board . 75 Member Conduct Committee . 76 Membership and Transfers Committee . 77 Membership Development Committee . 79 New Initiatives Committee . 82 Nominations and Appointments Committee . 83 Public Information Committee . 87 Public Relations Advisory Committee . 88 Public Visibility Committee . 89 Publications Board . 90 Publications Services and Products Board . 94 Regional Activities Board . 96 SPECTRUM/INSTITUTE Advisory Board . 99 Standards Board . 100 Standards Association Board of Governors . 104 Strategic Planning Committee . 105 Technical Activities Board . 107 IEEE Society and Council Presidents . 111 Tellers Committee . 122 United States Activities Board . 125 IEEE-USA . 127 Women in Engineering Committee . 129 LISTING OF IEEE AWARD RECIPIENTS . 128 i IEEE BOARD OF DIRECTORS - COMPOSITION CHART 1963 1964 1965 1966 President Ernst Weber Clarence H.
    [Show full text]