DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2017 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY of MEDICINE This page intentionally left blank Contents About the National Academy of Medicine 5 Letter from the President 7 2018-2019 NAM Council 9 Organizational Chart 10 2018-2023 Strategic Plan 11 Program Highlights 13 Responding to Critical and Pressing Issues Collective Action to Combat Clinician Burnout 14 Building an International Scientific Framework for Human Genome Editing 17 Confronting the U.S. Opioid Epidemic 18 Advising the Nation and the World on the Future of Health and Health Care Guiding Policy for Better Health and Health Care 22 Advancing Health Equity 24 Measuring What Matters to Improve the U.S. Health System 27 Building a Framework for Patient- and Family-Engaged Care 28 Ensuring High-Quality Care for High-Need Patients 29 Leading and Inspiring for the Future Sparking Scientific and Social Innovation to Prepare for Global Aging 32 Sharing Science Through Storytelling 33 Enriching the Next Generation of Leaders 34 Member Spotlight 37 Members Inducted in 2017 (Class of 2016) 39 Members Elected in 2017 (Class of 2017) 42 2017 Annual Meeting 44 Richard and Hinda Rosenthal Symposium 45 In Memoriam 46 Awards 47 Gustav O. Lienhard Award for the Advancement of Health Care 48 Rhoda and Bernard Sarnat International Prize in Mental Health 49 Member Awards 50 Publications 51 Finances 59 Donor Recognition 61 Complete Program Listing 81 Contact Information 91 4 About the National Academy of Medicine Founded in 1970 as the Institute of Medicine, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) is one of three academies that make up the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (the National Academies). Operating under the 1863 congressional charter of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academies provide independent, objective analysis and advice to the nation and conduct other activities to solve complex problems and inform public policy decisions. The National Academies also encourage education and research, recognize outstanding contributions to knowledge, and increase public understanding in matters of science, engineering, and medicine. The National Academy of Medicine is: An independent, evidence-based scientific advisor. To carry out our work, we harness the talents and expertise of accomplished, thoughtful volunteers and undertake meticulous processes to avoid and balance bias. Our foundational goal is to be the nation’s most reliable source for credible scientific and policy advice on matters concerning human health. A national academy with global scope. Although the National Academies were originally created to advise the U.S. government and advance the well-being of the U.S. population, our mandate is now much broader. The NAM includes members from across the globe and partners with organizations worldwide to address challenges that affect us all. Committed to catalyzing action and achieving impact. We identify and generate momentum around critical issues in health; marshal diverse expertise to build evidence-based solutions; inspire action through collaboration and public engagement; and foster the next generation of leaders and innovators. Collaborative and interdisciplinary. In partnership with the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and other stakeholders, the NAM draws on expertise across disciplines and domains to advance science, medicine, technology, and health. An honorific society for exceptional leaders. The NAM has more than 2,000 members elected by their peers in recognition of outstanding achievement. Through a commitment to volunteer service, NAM members help guide the work and advance the mission of the NAM and the National Academies. 5 NAM President Victor J. Dzau, MD, addresses members at the 2017 Annual Meeting. 6 Letter from the President For nearly 50 years, since its founding as the Institute of Medicine, the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) has been committed to upholding the essential role of science and evidence in improving human health. Today, amid unprecedented challenges in the Following the tragic mass shootings in Las United States and worldwide—from the ero- Vegas and Parkland, we drew on the 2013 sion of scientific authority in public discourse report Priorities for Research to Reduce the to devastating natural disasters, infectious Threat of Firearm-Related Violence to urge the disease outbreaks, and gun violence—that adoption of a thorough public health research foundational commitment has never been agenda to stem the epidemic of violence. more important. I am pleased that Congress clarified the In this report, we share recent highlights spending bill provision known as the Dickey from the NAM’s programs, which are Amendment, which had acted as a decades- working to advance science, inform policy, long legislative barrier to federally funded and improve health across many fronts. We firearm research. Finally, there is a pathway to also acknowledge the contributions of NAM an evidence-based analysis of one of the most members, volunteers, and donors in 2017, important issues of our time. whose expertise, commitment, and support Of course, we must do far more than look makes our important work possible. to our past work to inform current challenges. During the past year, we spoke out more As we approach the 50th anniversary of our strongly than ever before in defense of science founding in 1970, we are turning our attention and evidence as the north star for effective to the next five decades and mapping the policy making. As challenges emerged, I am greatest priorities and opportunities in proud that we were able to respond quickly health. We have just completed a strategic with authoritative guidance. For example, plan (described further on page 11) to guide when misinformation spread about health our work and build an infrastructure that will risks from vaccines—leading to a preventable sustain our mission for decades to come. outbreak of measles in Michigan—we Among several overarching goals is the redistributed our extensive body of evidence imperative to “lead and inspire action on on vaccines’ proven safety and immense bold ideas to impact science, medicine, societal benefit. policy, and health equity domestically and After the catastrophic string of hurricanes in globally.” We are preparing to face some of Florida, Texas, and Puerto Rico, we leveraged the monumental challenges and opportunities our series of reports on disaster preparedness before us, such as the aging global population, and response to advise officials from the U.S. the fragility of our ecosystems, the growing Department of Health and Human Services threat of pandemic disease, and technological and the Federal Emergency Management frontiers that were unimaginable just a few Agency about how to rebuild communities to years ago. promote better health and greater resilience in the future. Continued 7 To meet the needs of the future, we address disparities in health and access to must break down barriers and embrace care worldwide. We must create policy and the convergence of scientific disciplines. incentives that reward innovation and ensure We must equip the scientific and medical scientific advancement. And we must build workforces of the future with the appropriate the tools and mindset required to confront skills and an ethical framework to navigate a multitude of challenges we cannot yet a rapidly changing landscape. We must anticipate. I look forward with pride and determination to another year of progress toward our vision—a healthier future for everyone. Victor J. Dzau, MD 8 2018-2019 NAM Council The National Academy of Medicine is governed by a Council composed of NAM members elected by the membership. Victor J. Dzau, MD (Chair) R. Alta Charo, JD, Warren P. Lynn R. Goldman, MD, Margaret Hamburg, MD Knowles Professor of Law & MPH, Dean, School of Public (Foreign Secretary); President, Bioethics, School of Law and Health and Health Services; American Association for the Department of Medical History Professor, Environmental Advancement of Science and Bioethics, School of Medi- and Occupational Health, The cine and Public Health, Univer- George Washington University Jane E. Henney, MD sity of Wisconsin–Madison (Home Secretary) Eve J. Higginbotham, MD, Angela Diaz, MD, MPH, Vice Dean, Inclusion and Di- Keith R. Yamamoto, PhD Jean C. and James W. Crystal versity; Senior Fellow, Leonard (Vice Chair); Vice Chancellor for Professor of Adolescent Health, Davis Institute of Health Eco- Science Policy and Strategy; Department of Pediatrics and nomics; Professor of Ophthal- Vice Dean for Research, School Department of Preventive mology, Scheie Eye Institute; of Medicine; Professor, Cellular Medicine, Icahn School of Medi- Perelman School of Medicine, & Molecular Pharmacology, cine at Mount Sinai University of Pennsylvania University of California, San Francisco Mark C. Fishman, MD, Raynard Kington, MD, PhD, Professor of Stem Cell and President, Grinnell College Nancy Andrews, PhD, MD, Regenerative Biology, Harvard Story Landis, PhD, Scientist Vice Chancellor and Dean, University Duke University School of Emeritus, National Institute of Medicine Linda P. Fried, MD, MPH, Neurological Disorders and Dean and DeLamar Profes- Stroke Jeffrey R. Balser, MD, PhD, sor of Public Health, Joseph Albert Reece, MD, PhD, President and CEO, Vanderbilt L. Mailman School of Public University Medical Center; MBA, Vice President for Health, Columbia University; Medical Affairs, University of Dean, School of Medicine, Professor of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Information Technology R&D: Critical Trends and Issues
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 261 643 IR 011 789 TITLE Information Technology R&D: Critical Trends and Issues. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Office of Technology Assessment. REPORT NO OTA-CIT-268 PUB DATE Feb 85 NOTE 349p. AVAILABLE FROMSuperintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) -- Viewpoints (120) -- Reports - Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC14 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Artificial Intelligence; Case Studies; *Computers; Foreign Countries; Information Networks; Information Science; *Research and Development; Research Projects; *Scientific Research; Technological Advancement; *Telecommunications IDENTIFIERS *Computer Architecture; *Fiber Optics; Software Engineering; United States ABSTRACT This Office of Technology Assessment report on the current state of research and development in the telecommunications industry in the United States examines four specific areas of research as case studies: computer architecture, artificial intelligence, fiber optics, and software engineering. It discusses the structure and orientation osome selected foreign programs as they challenge traditional U.S. 'market leadership in some areas of computers and communications. Fihally, it examines a set of issues that were raised in the course ok the study: manpower, institutional change, the new research organizations that grew out of Bell Laboratories, and the implications of trends in overall science and technology policy. Following an introduction and summary
    [Show full text]
  • HOW FAR HAVE WE COME in REDUCING HEALTH DISPARITIES? Progress Since 2000
    HOW FAR HAVE WE COME IN REDUCING HEALTH DISPARITIES? Progress Since 2000 Workshop Summary Karen M. Anderson, Rapporteur Roundtable on the Promotion of Health Equity and the Elimination of Health Disparities Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Govern- “Knowing is not enough; we must apply. ing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the Willing is not enough; we must do.” councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineer- —Goethe ing, and the Institute of Medicine. This study was supported by contracts between the National Academy of Sciences and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Aetna Inc.; Merck & Co., Inc.; Sanofi Aventis; and Kaiser Permanente. The views presented in this publication do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided sup- port for this project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-25530-1 International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-25530-9 Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu. For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu. Copyright 2012 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Annual Report
    2008 Annual Report NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING ENGINEERING THE FUTURE 1 Letter from the President 3 In Service to the Nation 3 Mission Statement 4 Program Reports 4 Engineering Education 4 Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education 6 Technological Literacy 6 Public Understanding of Engineering Developing Effective Messages Media Relations Public Relations Grand Challenges for Engineering 8 Center for Engineering, Ethics, and Society 9 Diversity in the Engineering Workforce Engineer Girl! Website Engineer Your Life Project Engineering Equity Extension Service 10 Frontiers of Engineering Armstrong Endowment for Young Engineers-Gilbreth Lectures 12 Engineering and Health Care 14 Technology and Peace Building 14 Technology for a Quieter America 15 America’s Energy Future 16 Terrorism and the Electric Power-Delivery System 16 U.S.-China Cooperation on Electricity from Renewables 17 U.S.-China Symposium on Science and Technology Strategic Policy 17 Offshoring of Engineering 18 Gathering Storm Still Frames the Policy Debate 20 2008 NAE Awards Recipients 22 2008 New Members and Foreign Associates 24 2008 NAE Anniversary Members 28 2008 Private Contributions 28 Einstein Society 28 Heritage Society 29 Golden Bridge Society 29 Catalyst Society 30 Rosette Society 30 Challenge Society 30 Charter Society 31 Other Individual Donors 34 The Presidents’ Circle 34 Corporations, Foundations, and Other Organizations 35 National Academy of Engineering Fund Financial Report 37 Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants 41 Notes to Financial Statements 53 Officers 53 Councillors 54 Staff 54 NAE Publications Letter from the President Engineering is critical to meeting the fundamental challenges facing the U.S. economy in the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Donor Appreciation
    2018 Revenues Donor Appreciation We gratefully acknowledge the support of private contributors to the National 2018 Expenses Academy of Medicine. The collective, private philanthropy of our members and friends helps to enhance the NAM’s mission to lead, inspire innovation, and impact the health of all people. 51 2018 Donor Recognition In 2018, contributions from private donors helped the National Academy of Medicine provide expert advice to the nation, inspire bold ideas around the globe, and build leadership capacity for the future of health and health care. We are deeply grateful for the generous support. Every gift helps the NAM promote its core mission and respond to urgent priorities. Highlights from the year include: • $10.8 million in new commitments • $4.9 million for the Healthy Longevity Global Grand Challenge • $1.5 million for the Action Collaborative on Countering the U.S. Opioid Epidemic • 596 NAM members and friends contributed $535,120 to the Annual Fund • 29% of NAM members gave to the NAM or the Committee on Human Rights • New Einstein Society Members (cumulative giving of $100,000 or more) ▫ David Baltimore ▫ Barry and Bobbi Coller ▫ Jane Henney and Robert Graham. • New NAM Society Members (cumulative giving of $20,000) ▫ Mary and Dennis Bier ▫ Nathaniel E. David ▫ Norman and Deann Gant ▫ Sid Gilman and Carol Barbour ▫ James S. and Judith M. Marks ▫ Paul A. Offit ▫ Palmer and Susan Taylor ▫ David Walt and Michele May ▫ Myron and Linda Weisfeldt ▫ Keith R. Yamamoto Philanthropic gifts and grants make it possible for the NAM to fulfill its mission. We greatly appreciate all of the support received from our many members and friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral Health Summit Final Report
    2011 Regional Oral Health Summit Final Report The Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Improving Oral Health Tuesday, September 13, 2011 University of Kansas Medical Center Beller Conference Center Kansas City, Kansas Department of Health and Human Services DHHS 11/10/2011 1 HRSA Regional Oral Health Summit Final Report Contents Page Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………. 3 I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………...5 II. Welcoming Remarks………………………………………………………………….7 a. Judy Baker, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Regional Director………………………………………………………7 III. New Landscape in Oral Health………………………………………………………9 a. CAPT Debra Scott, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Regional Administrator……………………………………………..9 b. Ralph Fuccillo, President of DentaQuest Foundation……………………….11 c. Dr. Peter Damiano, University of Iowa, Director Public Policy Center……..12 IV. Panel of Federal Partners…………………………………………………………..13 a. Sam Gabuzzi –Administration on Aging………………………………….…13 b. Elizabeth Cox, Administration for Children and Families…………………...14 c. LT Sheila Weagle, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention………….....14 d. Gail Brown-Stevens, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services…………15 e. CAPT Julie Sadovich, Health Resources and Services Administration……..15 V. State Break Out Groups……………………………………………………………17 a. Iowa………………………………………………………………………….18 b. Kansas………………………………………………………………………..21 c. Missouri……………………………………………………………………....22 d. Nebraska……………………………………………………………………..23 VI. Key Note- Dr. Howard Koh, HHS Assistant
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Areas for Improvement of Quality in Public Health
    Priority Areas for Improvement of Quality in Public Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Public Health Quality Forum November 2010 For more information contact: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health Office of Healthcare Quality 200 Independence Ave, SW, Room 719B Washington, DC 20201 202-260-5184 Suggested Citation Honoré, P.A., & Scott, W. (2010). Priority areas for improvement of quality in public health. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services. Vision for Public Health Quality Howard K. Koh, MD, MPH Assistant Secretary for Health November 6, 2010 Priority Areas for Improvement of Quality in Public Health Improving the health of our nation remains a noble societal goal. Yet, for too long, people across America have not reached their full health potential. We need revitalized efforts to move toward a healthier nation. The advent of the Affordable Care Act serves as a catalyst for such change by promoting quality, access to care, and community and clinical prevention. We should maximize this transformative opportunity to elevate the health of our society. Improving quality lies at the heart of the Affordable Care Act. At this critical time, we should synthesize lessons learned from the seminal work in quality initially established in the healthcare arena and also broaden quality improvement efforts that can apply to populations. This will require commitment and coordination from many sectors of society, an approach requiring “health in all policies”. It will also require a vision that links quality, prevention, treatment and access to care.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael S. Brown, MD
    DISTINGUISHED PHYSICIANS AND Michael S. Brown, M.D. Sir Richard Roberts, Ph.D. Winner, 1985 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Winner, 1993 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine MEDICAL SCIENTISTS MENTORING Winner, 1988 Presidential National Medal of Science A globally prominent biochemist and molecular biologist, DELEGATES HAVE INCLUDED... Dr. Brown received the world’s most prestigious medical Dr. Roberts was awarded the Nobel Prize for his prize for his work describing the regulation of the groundbreaking contribution to discovering RNA splicing. cholesterol metabolism. His work laid the foundation for Dr. Roberts is dedicating his future research to GMO crops the class of drugs now called statins taken daily by more than 20 million and food sources, and demonstrating the effect they have on humanity. — GRANDg MASTERS — people worldwide. Ferid Murad, M.D., Ph.D. Mario Capecchi, Ph.D. Boris D. Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H Winner, 1998 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine Academy Science Director The Surgeon General of the United States (acting, 2013-2014) Winner, 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine A world-renowned pioneer in biochemistry, Dr. Murad’s Winner, 2001 National Medal of Science Rear Admiral Lushniak, M.D., M.P.H., was the United award-winning research demonstrated that nitroglycerin Winner, 2001 Lasker Award States’ leading spokesperson on matters of public health, and related drugs help patients with heart conditions by Winner, 2003 Wolf Prize in Medicine overseeing the operations of the U.S. Public Health Service releasing nitric oxide into the body, thus relaxing smooth Mario Capecchi, Ph.D., a biophysicist, is a Distinguished Commissioned Corps, which consists of approximately muscles by elevating intracellular cyclic GMP, leading to vasodilation and Professor of Human Genetics at the University of Utah School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed October 05, 2015 - Case No
    Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed October 05, 2015 - Case No. 2015-1472 In the Supreme Court of Ohio STATE OF OHIO ex rel. Michael T. McKibben, an Ohio Citizen Case No. 2015-1472 Relator, Original Action in Mandamus vs. OHIO ETHICS COMMISSION, MICHAEL V. DRAKE, Ohio Public Servants, Respondents. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT MICHAEL V. DRAKE’S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR’S COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS Michael T. McKibben Michael J. Hendershot (#81842) 1676 Tendril Court Assistant Attorney General Columbus, Ohio 43229-1429 30 East Broad Street, 17th Floor (614) 890-3141 Columbus, Ohio 43215 [email protected] (614) 466-8980 [email protected] RELATOR, PRO SE Molly J. Bruns (#70972) Investigative Attorney Ohio Ethics Commission William Green Building 30 West Spring Street, L3 Columbus, OH 43215-2256 (614) 466.7090 [email protected] Counsel for RESPONDENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Case Caption ........................................................................................................................ i Request for Relief Summary .............................................................................................. iii Table of Contents .................................................................................................................v Exhibits .............................................................................................................................. vi Table of Authorities ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Rich (1924–2015) Biologist Who Discovered Ribosome Clusters and ‘Left-Handed’ DNA
    OBITUARY COMMENT Alexander Rich (1924–2015) Biologist who discovered ribosome clusters and ‘left-handed’ DNA. first came across Alexander Rich worked out the structure of Rich in 1963. He was on the a Z-DNA fragment bound to an cover of that year’s 13 May issue RNA-editing enzyme. He and his Iof Newsweek with his PhD student colleagues also showed how the JOSIAH D. RICH Jonathan Warner. The two of them pathogenicity of the vaccinia virus, had just discovered clusters of ribo- and probably of the smallpox virus, somes called polysomes — crucial correlated with a virus-specific pro- components involved in the build- tein binding to the host’s Z-DNA. ing of proteins. Rich’s interest in the latest Rich, who died on 27 April, was discoveries across diverse disciplines born in 1924 in Hartford, Connecticut was irrepressible. During the 1970s, to immigrant parents from Russia and he worked as an adviser for NASA, Eastern Europe. He grew up during weighing in on projects exploring the Great Depression in Springfield, the possible existence of life on Mars. Massachusetts, attending a technical He also ventured into biotechnology secondary school by day, and work- and co-founded three companies: ing nights at a local rifle factory. At Repligen, Alkermes, and in his 80s, one point, his family went to live at a 3-D Matrix. local YMCA club after being evicted Rich received numerous honorary from their home. Against the odds, degrees and awards, including the US Rich made it to Harvard University National Medal of Science, presented in Cambridge, Massachusetts, grad- to him in 1995 by then US President uating with a bachelor’s degree in Bill Clinton.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Cellular Biology Volume 4 - December 1984 C Number 12
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY VOLUME 4 - DECEMBER 1984 C NUMBER 12 Aaron J. Shatkin, Editor in Chief(1985) Louis Siminovitch, Editor (1985) Roche Institute of Molecular Biology Hospital for Sick Children Nutley, N.J. Toronto, Canada Harvey F. Lodish, Editor (1986) Paul S. Sypherd, Editor (1985) Whitehead Institute for Biomedical University of California Research Irvine, Calif. Cambridge, Mass. Harold E. Varmus, Editor (1989) David J. L. Luck, Editor (1987) University of California Rockefeller University San Francisco New York, N.Y. EDITORIAL BOARD Renato Baserga (1985) Ari Helenius (1984) Steven McKnight (1986) Milton J. Schlesinger (1986) Alan Bernstein (1984) Susan A. Henry (1985) Robert L. Metzenberg (1985) Phillip A. Sharp (1985) J. Michael Bishop (1984) Ira Herskowitz (1984) Robert K. Mortimer (1985) Fred Sherman (1985) Joan Brugge (1985) James B. Hicks (1986) Paul Neiman (1986) Anna Marie Skalka (1986) Breck Byers (1985) John A. Carbon (1984) Tony Hunter (1986) Harvey L. Ozer (1985) Pamela Stanley (1985) Lawrence A. Chasin (1985) Larry Kedes (1985) Mary Lou Pardue (1985) Joan A. Steitz (1985) Nam-Hai Chua (1985) Barbara Knowles (1986) Mark Pearson (1985) James L. Van Etten (1985) Terrance G. Cooper (1984) Marilyn Kozak (1985) Jeremy Pickett-Heaps (1985) Jonathan R. Warner (1984) James E. Darnell, Jr. (1985) Monty Krieger (1986) Robert E. Pollack (1985) Robert A. Weinberg (1984) Gary Felsenfeld (1985) Elias Lazarides (1985) Keith R. Porter (1985) I. Bernard Weinstein (1985) Norton B. Gilula (1985) John B. Little (1985) John R. Pringle (1985) Harold Weintraub (1985) James E. Haber (1984) William F. Loomis, Jr. (1985) Daniel B. Rifkin (1985) Reed B.
    [Show full text]
  • Primer Requirement and Template Specificity of the DNA Polymerase of RNA Tumor Viruses (Avian Myeloblastosis Virus/Mouse Leukemia Virus/E
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 68, No. 7, pp. 1507-1511, July 1971 Primer Requirement and Template Specificity of the DNA Polymerase of RNA Tumor Viruses (avian myeloblastosis virus/mouse leukemia virus/E. coli DNA polymerase/ homopolynucleotides/oligonucleotides) DAVID BALTIMORE AND DONNA SMOLER Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass. 02139 Communicated by Alexander Rich, April 26, 1971 ABSTRACT Polyribonucleotides will act as efficient way, to prefer polyribonucleotides to polydeoxvribonucleo- templates for the DNA polymerases found in the virions of tides as templates. avian myeloblastosis virus and mouse leukemia virus if a short complementary oligodeoxyribonucleotide primer is MATERIALS AND METHODS added. Synthesis of the complementary polydeoxyribo- nucleotide continues until an amount of polymer equal to Polyribonucleotides were obtained from Miles Laboratories, the amount of initial template has been produced. The Elkhart, Ind.; their concentrations were determined from two viruses show slightly different specificities toward the the extinction coefficients provided by the manufacturer. four homoribopolymers. Polydeoxyribonucleotides are Dr. F. generally much poorer templates than the homologous Polydeoxyribonucleotides were a kind gift of Bollum; polyribonucleotides, in most cases yielding no detectable their concentrations were determined from extinction co- synthesis. The DNA polymerases of RNA tumor viruses, efficients provided by Dr. Bollum. The oligodeoxyribonucleo- therefore, have the same requirements for activity as do tides were a product of Collaborative Research, Waltham, other DNA polymerases, except that they prefer polyribo- Mass., and had chain lengths of 12-16 units (which are indi- nucleotides over polydeoxyribonucleotides as templates. cated as 14 in the text); their concentrations were determined Virions of the RNA tumor viruses contain a DNA polymerase from the extinction coefficients of the respective polydeoxy- (1, 2) which, in the absence of added nucleic acid, synthesizes ribonucleotides.
    [Show full text]
  • NAM 2020 Annual Meeting Donor Listing Consolidated Final Version
    2019 Honor Roll of Donors We gratefully acknowledge the following members and friends who have made generous charitable lifetime contributions. Their collective, private philanthropy enhances the impact of the Academies as advisor to the nation on matters of science, engineering, and medicine. Recently, three new giving societies were introduced, recognizing donors at $250,000 and above. Boldfaced names are NAM members. The Lincoln Society In recognition of members and friends who have made lifetime contributions of $1,000,000 or more to the National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, or National Academy of Medicine. Bruce and Betty Alberts Irwin and Joan Jacobs Richard L. and Hinda G. Richard and Rita Atkinson Robert L. and Anne K. Rosenthal* Norman R. Augustine James Martine A. Rothblatt Craig and Barbara Barrett Kenneth A. Jonsson* Jack W. and Valerie Rowe Jordan* and Rhoda Baruch Fred Kavli* Fritz J. and Dolores H. Russ Stephen D. Bechtel, Jr. Daniel E. Koshland, Jr.* Prize Fund of the Russ Arnold and Mabel Tillie K. Lubin* College of Engineering Beckman* Whitney* and Betty and Technology at Ohio Leonard Blavatnik MacMillan University Harry E. Bovay, Jr.* John F. McDonnell Dame Jillian Sackler Donald L. Bren George P. Mitchell* Raymond* and Beverly Harvey V. Fineberg and The Ambrose Monell Sackler Mary E. Wilson Foundation Bernard and Rhoda Sarnat* Bernard M. Gordon Gordon and Betty Moore Leonard D. Schaeffer Cecil H. Green* Philip and Sima Sara Lee and Axel Schupf Michael and Sheila Held* Needleman James H. and Marilyn William R. and Rosemary B. Peter O’Donnell, Jr. Simons Hewlett* Robert* and Mayari Pritzker John and Janet Swanson Ming and Eva Hsieh Listed below are individuals who became members of the Lincoln Society between January 1 and October 7, 2020: Marci and James J.
    [Show full text]