DOCSLIB.ORG

GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members 7INTERs3PRING 4HE'3!2EPORTER winter s spring 2012 New Executive GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members Director Now on Board The Genetics Society of America New Members of the GSA Board of welcomes four new members elected Directors Adam P. Fagen, by the general membership to the Ph.D., stepped in as 2012 GSA Board of Directors. The VICE PRESIDENT: GSA’s new Executive new members are: Michael Lynch Michael Lynch, Director beginning (Indiana University), who serves as Distinguished December 1, 2011. vice president in 2012 and as GSA Professor of Dr. Fagen previously president in 2013 and Marnie E. Biology, Class of was at the American Halpern (Carnegie Institution for 1954 Professor, Society of Plant Science); Mohamed Noor (Duke Department of Biologists (ASPB), University); and John Schimenti Biology, Indiana where he was the director of public (Cornell University), who will serve as University, continued on page nineteen directors. Bloomington. Dr. Lynch is a population and evolutionary biologist and a In addition to these elected officers, long-time member of GSA. Dr. Lynch 2012 Brenda J. Andrews (University of sees GSA as the home for geneticists Toronto), Editor-in-Chief of GSA’s who study a broad base of topics GSA Award journal, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, and organisms, and as a forum Recipients which was first published online in where general discussion occurs, June 2011, becomes a member of the whether based on the principles Announced Board of Directors. The bylaws have of genetics, the most pressing historically included the GENETICS GSA is pleased to announce the issues within the discipline itself, or editor-in-chief on the Board and as a responses to societal concerns and/ 2012 recipients of its five awards result of a 2011 bylaw revision, the G3 for distinguished service in the or conflicts within applied genetics. editor-in-chief will now also have a seat His professional interests focus on field of genetics. The recipients on the Board. of these awards were nominated integrating the life sciences, from and selected by their colleagues. “We are delighted to have these molecular to cellular to whole They are: Katherine V. Anderson for prominent scientists and educators join organism biology, and emphasizing the Thomas Hunt Morgan Medal; the Board this year and look forward the synthesis of empirical investigation Joanne Chory, for the Genetics to their leadership as the Society with well-grounded mathematical Society of America Medal; Therese continues to grow and evolve. We theory, a bridge made possible by Markow for the George W. Beadle thank the outgoing Board members for genetics. Award; David A. Micklos for the their dedicated service and continued DIRECTORS: Elizabeth W. Jones Award for involvement,” said GSA Executive Marnie E. Excellence in Education; and, Dana Director Adam P. Fagen. Halpern, Carroll for the Edward Novitski These new officers and directors Staff Member, Prize. began their tenure on January 1, 2012, Department of GSA President Philip Hieter, and will remain on the GSA Board until Embryology, said, “the individuals honored December 31, 2014. Carnegie Institution for Science; Adjunct continued on page fifteen continued on page four Genetics Society of America 1 4HE'3!2EPORTER 7INTERs3PRING Uniting Genetics for a Stronger GSA by Adam Fagen, Executive Director ’m very happy to be at GSA, working with the Board, membership, and staff to advance the interests of the genetics community and ensure a strong future for the Society. Coming to GSA brings me back to my roots: although my career path has brought me from Published three times a year the lab to science education and policy, genetics remains my scientific home in many and distributed by ways (See New Director article on page 1). The Genetics Society of America I It’s also nice to reconnect with the many members of the GSA community who I worked with as Volume 9, Number 1 an undergraduate and graduate student and in previous positions at the National Academy of officers Sciences/National Research Council and the American Society of Plant Biologists. Phil Hieter, President One of my goals for the Society is to make sure there are strong lines of communication among Michael Lynch, Vice President GSA members and with the staff and leadership. Towards this goal, we’re making better use of Paul W. Sternberg, Past President our Facebook page (http://www.facebook.com/GeneticsGSA) and Twitter feeds (http://twitter. Mariana F. Wolfner, Secretary com/GeneticsGSA) and will be making changes to the GSA website this year to make it more Carol S. Newlon, Treasurer useful and informative for GSA members and the public. Mark Johnston, GENETICS, And, we want to hear from you about what GSA is doing well, what we could be doing better, and Editor-in-Chief what more we could be doing. Brenda J. Andrews, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics Starting the Conversation Editor-in-Chief To start this conversation, I have a question “How do we bring the board of directors I’d like to ask: How do Utpal Banerjee we bring the entire genetics entire genetics community Bonnie Bartel community together across model Judith G. Berman systems while continuing to promote the together across model Elizabeth A. De Stasio strong sense of belonging among those systems...? Marnie E. Halpern who work with individual model organisms? Sue Jinks-Robertson Although the genetics community is strong and Jeannie T. Lee Mohamed A. F. Noor growing, it is also somewhat splintered. That is to say many of us identify at least as much with John C. Schimenti our own model organism as we do with the discipline of genetics. Yet there is something that Thomas J. Silhavy binds us together as geneticists: there are similar kinds of questions we answer and similar approaches we use, whether working in fruit flies or fruit plants, zebrafish or zebra finches. executive director We teach the same courses, apply for the same funding, and publish in many of the same Adam P. Fagen journals—including and especially in GENETICS and G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics. managing editor I know that many associate your interactions with GSA from participation in a GSA-sponsored Phyllis R. Edelman conference and join the Society at least partly because of discounts on meeting registration. But while GSA will continue to seek opportunities to bring in other model organism communities The publication of an advertisement in this newsletter does not constitute on the part of The Genetics (e.g., GSA is coordinating the International Conference on Zebrafish Development and Genetics Society of America a guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of the advertised products or services for the first time this year), geneticists are using dozens of model systems for studying questions described in the advertisement, or of any of the of interest—and there’s an increasing tendency to move across systems in order to follow the representations or claims made by the advertisers with respect to such products or services. science where it leads. How do we best represent the interests of geneticists whether or not there’s a GSA-sponsored model organism conference for your research community? 9650 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20814-3998 Of course, many within our community don’t study specific model systems but focus on Tel: (301) 634-7300 fundamental and applied aspects of genetics more generally. How can the Society best serve Fax: (301) 634-7079 and integrate those who study population genetics, genomics, evolution, education, systems Email: [email protected] biology, and many other areas that are not limited to particular organisms? www.genetics-gsa.org Copyright ©2012 by the Genetics Society of America. All rights reserved. continued on page nine 2 Genetics Society of America president’s message 7INTERs3PRING 4HE'3!2EPORTER In October 2009, I attended the raised awareness. American Society of Human Genetics Comparison of the genome sequences (ASHG) Annual Meeting where the of E. coli, yeast, worm, fly, mouse, and 150th anniversary of the publication human directly demonstrated the of Darwin’s The Origin of Species striking extent to which all organisms was celebrated. In the opening are built from the same set of genes session, several talks reviewed how and highlighted the enormous value the determination and comparison of of model experimental organisms for the entire the study of evolutionarily conserved One of our goals must genome gene function. These landmark sequence also be to stimulate accomplishments showed that few, if from as interaction among any, biological processes are unique to few as four humans at the gene level. geneticists. patients suffering It became clear that fundamental Phil aspects of most human disorders Hieter from an “orphan disease” could reveal the can be informed through analysis of Connecting, single gene, mutated in each of orthologous genes and pathways in the four genomes, that is the major experimentally tractable organisms Communicating genetic determinant. I realized for by using sophisticated experimental the first time we were at the brink of toolboxes developed for each model and Collaborating an unprecedented era of mutation organism. And the aggregate of discovery in humans. Who could model organisms was much more How interaction among all have predicted, even four years ago, powerful than any one, because of the geneticists strengthens our when Jim Watson’s personal genome complementarity of their biology and community sequence was published in Nature experimental tools. by Phil Hieter, GSA President
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1999 Annual Report
    1999 1999 BANBURY CENTER DIRECTOR'S REPORT The Banbury Center program continues to be as eclectic and exciting as ever. The year was filled with more meetings than ever before-a record 23 of them! Laboratory scientists used the Center for seven in-house meetings, and local community groups came here on eight occasions. Together with the five neurobiology courses, there was hardly a week when the Center was not in use. Not surprisingly, 1999 was also a record year for the number of visitors to Banbury Center: 667 par­ ticipants attended the 23 meetings. The demographics of our participants remain much the same: 25% of visitors to Banbury Center came from abroad, with the United Kingdom, Germany, and Canada lead­ ing the way. Of the American scientists, those from New York, Massachusetts, and California together accounted for more than 32% of the total. However, participants were drawn from no fewer than 42 states. This is the first year that we have been able to use the Meier House to accommodate participants, which proved to be wonderful. Now the number of participants that we can house on the Banbury estate matches the number we can have in the Conference Room-we do not have to transport peo­ ple between the Center and the main campus. Biological and biomedical research is becoming ever more interdisciplinary, and as it does so, it also becomes ever more difficult to categorize the topics of Banbury Center meetings. A meeting may deal with the same phenomenon in a range of organisms, or many different strategies may be used to study one phenomenon in a single species.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
    hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Pomona College Magazine Fall/Winter 2020: the New (Ab
    INSIDE:THE NEW COLLEGE MAGAZINE (AB)NORMAL • The Economy • Childcare • City Life • Dating • Education • Movies • Elections Fall-Winter 2020 • Etiquette • Food • Housing •Religion • Sports • Tourism • Transportation • Work & more Nobel Laureate Jennifer Doudna ’85 HOMEPAGE Together in Cyberspace With the College closed for the fall semester and all instruction temporarily online, Pomona faculty have relied on a range of technologies to teach their classes and build community among their students. At top left, Chemistry Professor Jane Liu conducts a Zoom class in Biochemistry from her office in Seaver North. At bottom left, Theatre Professor Giovanni Molina Ortega accompanies students in his Musical Theatre class from a piano in Seaver Theatre. At far right, German Professor Hans Rindesbacher puts a group of beginning German students through their paces from his office in Mason Hall. —Photos by Jeff Hing STRAY THOUGHTS COLLEGE MAGAZINE Pomona Jennifer Doudna ’85 FALL/WINTER 2020 • VOLUME 56, NO. 3 2020 Nobel Prize in Chemistry The New Abnormal EDITOR/DESIGNER Mark Wood ([email protected]) e’re shaped by the crises of our times—especially those that happen when ASSISTANT EDITOR The Prize Wwe’re young. Looking back on my parents’ lives with the relative wisdom of Robyn Norwood ([email protected]) Jennifer Doudna ’85 shares the 2020 age, I can see the currents that carried them, turning them into the people I knew. Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her work with They were both children of the Great Depression, and the marks of that experi- BOOK EDITOR the CRISPR-Cas9 molecular scissors. Sneha Abraham ([email protected]) ence were stamped into their psyches in ways that seem obvious to me now.
    [Show full text]
  • Korunes Duke 0066D 14983.Pdf
    How Linkage Disequilibrium and Recombination Shape Genetic Variation Within and Between Species by Katharine L Korunes University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Paul Magwene ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Jeff Sekelsky Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT How Linkage Disequilibrium and Recombination Shape Genetic Variation Within and Between Species by Katharine L Korunes University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Paul Magwene ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Jeff Sekelsky An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Katharine L Korunes 2019 Abstract Meiotic recombination creates genetic diversity by shuffling combinations of alleles across loci, yet alleles at neighboring loci often remain non-randomly associated. This non-random association is
    [Show full text]
  • IST Annual Report 2019
    Annual Report 2019 IST Austria administrative and The people of IST Austria technical support staff by nationality Austria 59.4% Nationalities on campus Germany 5.6% Hungary 3.1% Poland 2.5% Romania 2.5% Scientists as well as administrative and technical support staff come Italy 2.1% Russia 1.7% from all over the world to conduct and back research at IST Austria. Czech Republic 1.4% As of December 31, 2019, a total of 72 nationalities were represented India 1.4% Slovakia 1.4% on campus. Spain 1.4% UK 1.4% Other 16.1% North America Europe Asia Canada Albania Italy Afghanistan Cuba Andorra Latvia Bangladesh El Salvador Armenia Lithuania China Mexico Austria Luxembourg South Korea USA Belarus Macedonia India Belgium Malta Iran Bosnia and Netherlands Israel Herzegovina Norway Japan Bulgaria Poland Jordan Croatia Portugal Kazakhstan Cyprus Romania Lebanon Czech Republic Serbia Mongolia Denmark Slovakia Philippines Finland Slovenia Russia France Spain Singapore Georgia Sweden Syria Germany Switzerland Vietnam Greece Turkey Hungary UK Ireland Ukraine Africa Egypt Kenya IST Austria scientists by nationality Libya Austria 14.7% Nigeria Germany 10.9% South America Italy 7.4% Argentina India 5.9% Russia 4.7% Brazil Slovakia 4.1% Chile China 4.1% Colombia Hungary 3.7% Peru Spain 3.3% Uruguay USA 3.1% Czech Republic 2.9% UK 2.4% Oceania Other 32.8% Australia Content 2 HAPPY BIRTHDAY! 40 RESEARCH 4 Foreword by the president 42 Biology 5 Board member voices 44 Computer science 6 “An Austrian miracle” 46 Mathematics A year of celebration 48 Neuroscience
    [Show full text]
  • Duke University Dissertation Template
    Life History Tradeoffs and Genetic Variation for Social Behaviors in a Wild Primate Population by Emily McLean University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Susan Alberts, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Mohamed Noor ___________________________ Jenny Tung ___________________________ Elizabeth Archie Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Life History Tradeoffs and Genetic Variation for Social Behaviors in a Wild Primate Population by Emily McLean University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Susan Alberts, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Mohamed Noor ___________________________ Jenny Tung ___________________________ Elizabeth Archie An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by Emily McLean 2018 Abstract Understanding the genetic and environmental forces that contribute to phenotypic variation is a major goal of evolutionary biology. However, social living blurs the distinction between genes and environments because the social environment is (at least in part) determined by the genes of its members. Therefore, the genes that influence an individual’s phenotype are not limited to his own genes (direct genetic effects) but potentially include the genes of individuals in his social context (indirect genetic effects). Indirect genetic effects are thought to be of particular importance in the evolution of social behavior. Social living is a common phenotype in many animal taxa and is especially well-developed in non-human primates and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja
    Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja To cite this version: Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja. Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation. American Naturalist, Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 2018, 191 (2), pp.155-172. 10.1086/695136. hal-01945350 HAL Id: hal-01945350 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945350 Submitted on 5 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License vol. 191, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2018 Synthesis Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger K. Butlin1,2,* and Carole M. Smadja1,3 1. Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; 2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; and Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö SE-45296 Strömstad, Sweden; 3. Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Institut de Recherche pour le Développement–École pratique des hautes études), Université de Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France Submitted March 15, 2017; Accepted August 28, 2017; Electronically published December 15, 2017 abstract: During the process of speciation, populations may di- Introduction verge for traits and at their underlying loci that contribute barriers Understanding how reproductive isolation evolves is key fl to gene ow.
    [Show full text]
  • Humankind 2.0: the Technologies of the Future 6. Biotech
    Humankind 2.0: The Technologies of the Future 6. Biotech Piero Scaruffi, 2017 See http://www.scaruffi.com/singular/human20.html for the full text of this discussion A brief History of Biotech 1953: Discovery of the structure of the DNA 2 A brief History of Biotech 1969: Jon Beckwith isolates a gene 1973: Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer create the first recombinant DNA organism 1974: Waclaw Szybalski coins the term "synthetic biology” 1975: Paul Berg organizes the Asilomar conference on recombinant DNA 3 A brief History of Biotech 1976: Genentech is founded 1977: Fred Sanger invents a method for rapid DNA sequencing and publishes the first full DNA genome of a living being Janet Rossant creates a chimera combining two mice species 1980: Genentech’s IPO, first biotech IPO 4 A brief History of Biotech 1982: The first biotech drug, Humulin, is approved for sale (Eli Lilly + Genentech) 1983: Kary Mullis invents the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for copying genes 1986: Leroy Hood invents a way to automate gene sequencing 1986: Mario Capecchi performs gene editing on a mouse 1990: William French Anderson’s gene therapy 1990: First baby born via PGD (Alan Handyside’s lab) 5 A brief History of Biotech 1994: FlavrSavr Tomato 1994: Maria Jasin’s homing endonucleases for genome editing 1996: Srinivasan Chandrasegaran’s ZFN method for genome editing 1996: Ian Wilmut clones the first mammal, the sheep Dolly 1997: Dennis Lo detects fetal DNA in the mother’s blood 2000: George Davey Smith introduces Mendelian randomization 6 A brief History of Biotech
    [Show full text]
  • David Botstein 2015 Book.Pdf
    Princeton University HONORS FACULTY MEMBERS RECEIVING EMERITUS STATUS May 2015 The biographical sketches were written by colleagues in the departments of those honored. Copyright © 2015 by The Trustees of Princeton University 550275 Contents Faculty Members Receiving Emeritus Status 2015 Steven L. Bernasek .......................3 David Botstein...........................6 Erhan Çinlar ............................8 Caryl Emerson.......................... 11 Christodoulos A. Floudas ................. 15 James L. Gould ......................... 17 Edward John Groth III ...................20 Philip John Holmes ......................23 Paul R. Krugman .......................27 Bede Liu .............................. 31 Alan Eugene Mann ......................33 Joyce Carol Oates .......................36 Clarence Ernest Schutt ...................39 Lee Merrill Silver .......................41 Thomas James Trussell ...................43 Sigurd Wagner .........................46 { 1 } { 2 } David Botstein avid Botstein was educated at Harvard (A.B. 1963) and the D University of Michigan (Ph.D. 1967). He joined the faculty of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, rising through the ranks from instructor to professor of genetics. In 1987, he moved to Genentech, Inc. as vice president–science, and, in 1990, he joined Stanford University’s School of Medicine, where he was chairman of the Department of Genetics. In July, 2003 he became director of the Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics and the Anthony B. Evnin ’62 Professor of Genomics at Princeton University. David’s research has centered on genetics, especially the use of genetic methods to understand biological functions. His early work in bacterial genetics contributed to the discovery of transposable elements in bacteria and an understanding of their physical structures and genetic properties. In the early 1970s, he turned to budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and devised novel genetic methods to study the functions of the actin and tubulin cytoskeletons.
    [Show full text]
  • MOHAMED NOOR Earl D
    MOHAMED NOOR Earl D. McLean Professor and Chair, Department of Biology BIOGRAPHY Mohamed Noor wants to answer one of the greatest unsolved questions in biology: How constant evolutionary change produces the discontinuous groups known as species. As technology improves Dr. Noor’s work gets closer to the answer. Recently, his research team used fruit fly species to understand the causes and evolutionary [ Faculty Fellow through December 2017 ] consequences of variation in rates of genetic recombination. Now, his team is working to determine the genetic features and evolutionary EDUCATION processes that allow hybridizing species to persist. From reframing foundational principles of biology to applying modern approaches like Cornell University, Section of Genetics and whole-genome sequencing, Noor explores a wide range of scientific Development, Post-doc, 1996-98 topics to figure out what makes organisms similar and at the same University of Chicago, Ecology and Evolution, time unique. Ph.D., 1996 College of William and Mary, Biology, B.S., 1992 Dr. Noor’s innovative techniques are not limited to his research. He has developed a popular online course, “Introduction to Genetics and Evolution,” and uses the ‘flipped classroom” technique to deliver TOPICS traditional lecture material online so that his class can discuss the material the next day. This allows Noor to interact with his 400 students and to address specific topics during his precious class time. Genetics and evolution In 2012, Dr. Noor was the recipient of the ADUTA award for teaching Molecular evolution excellence, a student-nominated and selected award, given by the Evolution by natural selection Duke Alumni Association.
    [Show full text]
  • The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT
    The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MIT The David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research was announced on October 9, 2007. By combining the faculty of the (now former) MIT Center for Cancer Research (CCR) with an equivalent number of distinguished engineers drawn from various MIT departments, the Koch Institute will continue CCR’s tradition of scientific excellence while also seeking to directly promote innovative ways to diagnose, monitor, and treat cancer through advanced technology. Among the engineering faculty there will be remarkable diversity, as the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Materials Science and Engineering, Biological Engineering, Chemical Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering departments will be represented in the Koch Institute. For three decades, CCR has been a mainstay of MIT’s—and the nation’s—efforts to conquer cancer. Its faculty has included five Nobel Prize winners, and the wealth of fundamental discoveries that have emerged under its aegis have helped shape the face of molecular biology. Under the banner of the Koch Institute, the future promises to hold even more astounding advances. Within the Koch Institute we will not directly provide clinical care for cancer patients but discoveries made by Koch Institute scientists and engineers will have a broad impact on how the disease is detected and managed. Applying our great strengths in science and technology, and working closely with our clinical collaborators, Koch Institute researchers will be tireless in unraveling the complexities of this disease and bringing new discoveries—and new hope—to patients. The Koch Institute includes more than 40 laboratories and more than 500 researchers located at our headquarters and across the MIT campus.
    [Show full text]
  • King Release Final 11.21.19
    Mary-Claire King, PhD, Joins the New York Genome Center as Senior Associate Core Member NEW YORK, NY (November 25, 2019) – The New York Genome Center (NYGC) announced today that internationally renowned Geneticist Mary-Claire KinG, PhD, has joined the NYGC faculty on a consultinG basis as Senior Associate Core Member. Dr. King will provide scientific leadership in the Genetics of neuropsychiatric disease. “We are deliGhted that Mary-Claire KinG is joininG the Center to support our efforts to understand the Genetic basis of psychiatric disorders. Dr. KinG’s exceptional vision and pioneerinG leadership in Genetics will advance our collaborative, inter-institutional Genetic and Genomic research in neuropsychiatric diseases,” said Tom Maniatis, PhD, Evnin Family Scientific Director and Chief Executive Officer of the NYGC. Dr. KinG is the American Cancer Society Professor in the Departments of Genome Sciences and Medicine at the University of WashinGton in Seattle. She was the first to show that breast and ovarian cancer is inherited in some families as the result of mutations in the Gene that she named BRCA1. This discovery has transformed the diagnosis, druG development and treatment of this inherited form of breast cancer. More recently, Dr. KinG has focused on the Genetics of schizophrenia, contributinG to the understandinG of complex disease inheritance. In 2014, Dr. King received the Lasker Special Achievement Award for Medical Research and in 2016, the United States National Medal of Science. Dr. KinG is also recoGnized as a pioneer in the development of DNA sequencinG for human riGhts investiGations. “I am excited to join the Center at this transformative time in its evolution,” said Dr.
    [Show full text]