DOCSLIB.ORG

Duke University Dissertation Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Duke University Dissertation Template Life History Tradeoffs and Genetic Variation for Social Behaviors in a Wild Primate Population by Emily McLean University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Susan Alberts, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Mohamed Noor ___________________________ Jenny Tung ___________________________ Elizabeth Archie Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics of Duke University 2018 ABSTRACT Life History Tradeoffs and Genetic Variation for Social Behaviors in a Wild Primate Population by Emily McLean University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Susan Alberts, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Mohamed Noor ___________________________ Jenny Tung ___________________________ Elizabeth Archie An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2018 Copyright by Emily McLean 2018 Abstract Understanding the genetic and environmental forces that contribute to phenotypic variation is a major goal of evolutionary biology. However, social living blurs the distinction between genes and environments because the social environment is (at least in part) determined by the genes of its members. Therefore, the genes that influence an individual’s phenotype are not limited to his own genes (direct genetic effects) but potentially include the genes of individuals in his social context (indirect genetic effects). Indirect genetic effects are thought to be of particular importance in the evolution of social behavior. Social living is a common phenotype in many animal taxa and is especially well-developed in non-human primates and humans. Social living is believed to be an adaptive response to ecological pressures and indeed, positive correlations between social behaviors and fitness components have been demonstrated in multiple species. However, despite a long-history of theoretical studies investigating the evolution of social behavior, whether social behaviors demonstrate the additive genetic variation necessary for evolution to occur remains poorly understood. No doubt this is due in part to the difficulty of determining the genetic basis of social behavior; social phenotypes are complex and by definition involve interactions between multiple individuals. Genetic variation for social behaviors, therefore, likely results from both direct and indirect genetic effects. Here, I investigated the direct and indirect sources of additive genetic variance in both agonistic and affiliative social behaviors, in a population of wild baboons. In this population (as well as in other populations and species), affiliative social behaviors iv have been clearly linked to survival, an important fitness component. Therefore, I began with an investigation of the sources of variance in female fitness in our population (Chapter 2). I found that heterogeneity in female quality was a primary driver of the relationship between life history traits, and phenotypic tradeoffs between these traits were apparent only when considering variation in individual quality. In chapter 3, I used a quantitative genetic approach to examine the direct and indirect sources of genetic variation in affiliative social behavior (grooming). I found that both grooming given and grooming received were heritable, and documented a positive genetic correlation between these traits. In chapter 4, I examined the sources of genetic variation in agonistic behavior. This investigation was complicated by the non-genetic transmission of dominance ranks from mothers to daughters. I implemented a novel method to partition social and genetic sources of similarity between relatives and found important roles for both genetic and social variance in the relationship between agonism given and agonism received. v Dedication “Camerado, I give you my hand! I give you my love more precious than money, I give you myself before preaching or law; Will you give me yourself? Will you come travel with me? Shall we stick by each other as long as we live?” -Walt Whitman, Song of the Open Road vi Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................................................... xv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. xvii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ xix 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Indirect genetic effects as a source of genetic variation ............................................... 1 1.2 From there to here: the origins of Chapter 2 ................................................................... 3 1.3 Role of indirect genetic effects on behavioral phenotypes: Chapters 3 and 4 ......... 5 1.4 The Amboseli Baboon population ..................................................................................... 9 2. Lifetime fitness in wild female baboons: tradeoffs and individual heterogeneity in quality .................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 12 2.1.1 Background and Motivation ......................................................................................... 12 2.1.2 Goals of this study .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2 Methods ................................................................................................................................. 16 2.2.1 Study Population ............................................................................................................ 16 2.2.2 Life History Traits .......................................................................................................... 18 Age at death (AD) ................................................................................................................ 18 Age at first live birth (AFLB) ............................................................................................. 18 Reproductive Lifespan (RL) .............................................................................................. 18 Offspring Survival (OS) ...................................................................................................... 19 Live Birth Rate (LBR) ......................................................................................................... 19 Surviving Birth Rate (SBR) ............................................................................................... 19 vii 2.2.3 Measures of individual fitness .................................................................................... 21 Lifetime reproductive success (LRS) .............................................................................. 21 . ......................................................................................................................................... 21 Variance in LRS explained by survival to age at first live birth ................................ 21 2.2.4 Relationships among offspring survival, reproductive lifespan, live birth rate, and fitness ................................................................................................................................ 22 2.2.5 Addressing effects of maternal age, maternal survival, and offspring survival on life history traits ............................................................................................................... 23 2.2.6 Detecting survival costs and reproductive costs of reproduction by considering heterogeneity in female quality ................................................................... 25 2.3 Results ................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.1 Females vary considerably in life history phenotypes and fitness .................... 28 Age at death, age at first live birth, reproductive lifespan, birth intervals, and offspring survival ............................................................................................................... 28 Measures of fitness ............................................................................................................ 30 2.3.2 Evidence for the quality hypothesis: the longest-lived females had the highest offspring survival ..................................................................................................... 31 2.3.3 Detecting tradeoffs depends on measuring individual quality .......................... 34 2.3.4 Maternal age affects offspring
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Korunes Duke 0066D 14983.Pdf
    How Linkage Disequilibrium and Recombination Shape Genetic Variation Within and Between Species by Katharine L Korunes University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Paul Magwene ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Jeff Sekelsky Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 ABSTRACT How Linkage Disequilibrium and Recombination Shape Genetic Variation Within and Between Species by Katharine L Korunes University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Mark Rausher, Chair ___________________________ Paul Magwene ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Jeff Sekelsky An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2019 Copyright by Katharine L Korunes 2019 Abstract Meiotic recombination creates genetic diversity by shuffling combinations of alleles across loci, yet alleles at neighboring loci often remain non-randomly associated. This non-random association is
    [Show full text]
  • GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members
    7INTERs3PRING 4HE'3!2EPORTER winter s spring 2012 New Executive GSA Welcomes 2012 Board Members Director Now on Board The Genetics Society of America New Members of the GSA Board of welcomes four new members elected Directors Adam P. Fagen, by the general membership to the Ph.D., stepped in as 2012 GSA Board of Directors. The VICE PRESIDENT: GSA’s new Executive new members are: Michael Lynch Michael Lynch, Director beginning (Indiana University), who serves as Distinguished December 1, 2011. vice president in 2012 and as GSA Professor of Dr. Fagen previously president in 2013 and Marnie E. Biology, Class of was at the American Halpern (Carnegie Institution for 1954 Professor, Society of Plant Science); Mohamed Noor (Duke Department of Biologists (ASPB), University); and John Schimenti Biology, Indiana where he was the director of public (Cornell University), who will serve as University, continued on page nineteen directors. Bloomington. Dr. Lynch is a population and evolutionary biologist and a In addition to these elected officers, long-time member of GSA. Dr. Lynch 2012 Brenda J. Andrews (University of sees GSA as the home for geneticists Toronto), Editor-in-Chief of GSA’s who study a broad base of topics GSA Award journal, G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics, and organisms, and as a forum Recipients which was first published online in where general discussion occurs, June 2011, becomes a member of the whether based on the principles Announced Board of Directors. The bylaws have of genetics, the most pressing historically included the GENETICS GSA is pleased to announce the issues within the discipline itself, or editor-in-chief on the Board and as a responses to societal concerns and/ 2012 recipients of its five awards result of a 2011 bylaw revision, the G3 for distinguished service in the or conflicts within applied genetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja
    Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja To cite this version: Roger Butlin, Carole Smadja. Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation. American Naturalist, Uni- versity of Chicago Press, 2018, 191 (2), pp.155-172. 10.1086/695136. hal-01945350 HAL Id: hal-01945350 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01945350 Submitted on 5 Dec 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License vol. 191, no. 2 the american naturalist february 2018 Synthesis Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation Roger K. Butlin1,2,* and Carole M. Smadja1,3 1. Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study, Wallenberg Research Centre at Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa; 2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom; and Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö SE-45296 Strömstad, Sweden; 3. Institut des Sciences de l’Evolution, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5554 (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique–Institut de Recherche pour le Développement–École pratique des hautes études), Université de Montpellier, 34095 Montpellier, France Submitted March 15, 2017; Accepted August 28, 2017; Electronically published December 15, 2017 abstract: During the process of speciation, populations may di- Introduction verge for traits and at their underlying loci that contribute barriers Understanding how reproductive isolation evolves is key fl to gene ow.
    [Show full text]
  • MOHAMED NOOR Earl D
    MOHAMED NOOR Earl D. McLean Professor and Chair, Department of Biology BIOGRAPHY Mohamed Noor wants to answer one of the greatest unsolved questions in biology: How constant evolutionary change produces the discontinuous groups known as species. As technology improves Dr. Noor’s work gets closer to the answer. Recently, his research team used fruit fly species to understand the causes and evolutionary [ Faculty Fellow through December 2017 ] consequences of variation in rates of genetic recombination. Now, his team is working to determine the genetic features and evolutionary EDUCATION processes that allow hybridizing species to persist. From reframing foundational principles of biology to applying modern approaches like Cornell University, Section of Genetics and whole-genome sequencing, Noor explores a wide range of scientific Development, Post-doc, 1996-98 topics to figure out what makes organisms similar and at the same University of Chicago, Ecology and Evolution, time unique. Ph.D., 1996 College of William and Mary, Biology, B.S., 1992 Dr. Noor’s innovative techniques are not limited to his research. He has developed a popular online course, “Introduction to Genetics and Evolution,” and uses the ‘flipped classroom” technique to deliver TOPICS traditional lecture material online so that his class can discuss the material the next day. This allows Noor to interact with his 400 students and to address specific topics during his precious class time. Genetics and evolution In 2012, Dr. Noor was the recipient of the ADUTA award for teaching Molecular evolution excellence, a student-nominated and selected award, given by the Evolution by natural selection Duke Alumni Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Isolation Between Two Species T. Freemani
    Heredity72 (1994) 155—1 62 Received 14 June 1.993 Genetical Society of Great Britain Reproductive isolation between two species of flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. freemani: variation within and among geographical populations of T castaneum MICHAEL J. WADE* & NORMAN A. JOHNSON Department of Ecology and Evolution, 1101 E. 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637,USA Tribolium casraneum and T freernani produce sterile hybrid progeny in reciprocal crosses. The reciprocal crosses differ significantly in the mean numbers of progeny, progeny sex ratios, hybrid male body size and male antennal and leg morphologies. These results suggest an effect of either the X chromosome or the cytoplasm on characteristics of F1 hybrids. In contrast, large X chromosome effects on morphological traits are not usually oberved in interspecific crosses among drosophilid flies. We also report large, significant differences in progeny numbers, body mass and degree of female bias in sex ratio between different geographic strains of T castaneum when mated in reciprocal crosses with T freemani. Sex ratio bias also varies significantly among matings within geographic strains of T castaneum. When T castaneum males are mated with T freemani females, but not in the reciprocal cross, the F1 sex ratio is female biased, uncorrelated with family size and ranges from 57.14 per cent to 72.23 per cent female, depending on the geographic strain of the T castaneum male. Keywords: hybridinviability, genetic variation,morphology, reproductive isolation, speciation, Tribolium sex that is most adversely affected. This rule applies to Introduction taxa in which males are the heterogametic sex (includ- Dobzhansky(1937),Mayr(1963) and others (Coyne et ing beetles) as well as in cases wherein females are the al., 1988; Coyne, 1992b; Wu & Davis, 1993) have heterogametic sex.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Prezygotic Reproductive Isolation in The
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2005 The evolution of prezygotic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup Sheri Dixon Schully Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Schully, Sheri Dixon, "The ve olution of prezygotic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila pseudoobscura subgroup" (2005). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1001. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1001 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE EVOLUTION OF PREZYGOTIC REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN THE DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA SUBGROUP A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Sheri Dixon Schully B.S., Louisiana State University, 2001 August 2005 DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my parents, Lydia and Dale Dixon. My dad taught me the values of first-rate hard work. My mother has always made me feel that I could accomplish anything I put my mind and heart into. It has been her belief in me that has gotten me this far. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to recognize and thank the people who made all of this work possible. First and foremost, I would like to express extreme gratitude to Mike Hellberg for his support and guidance.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters of Incompatible Genotypes Evolve with Limited Dispersal
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 22 April 2015 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00151 Clusters of incompatible genotypes evolve with limited dispersal Erin L. Landguth 1*, Norman A. Johnson 2 and Samuel A. Cushman 3 1 Computational Ecology Laboratory, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA, 2 Department of Biology, Department of Environmental Conservation, and Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA, 3 Rocky Mountain Research Station, United States Forest Service, Flagstaff, AZ, USA Theoretical and empirical studies have shown heterogeneous selection to be the primary driver for the evolution of reproductively isolated genotypes in the absence of geographic barriers. Here, we ask whether limited dispersal alone can lead to the evolution of reproductively isolated genotypes despite the absence of any geographic barriers or heterogeneous selection. We use a spatially-explicit, individual-based, landscape genetics program to explore the influences of dispersal strategies on reproductive isolation. We simulated genetic structure in a continuously distributed population and across various dispersal strategies (ranging from short- to long-range individual Edited by: movement), as well as potential mate partners in entire population (ranging from 20 to Stéphane Joost, 5000 individuals). We show that short-range dispersal strategies lead to the evolution of École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland clusters of reproductively isolated genotypes despite the absence of any geographic Reviewed by: barriers or heterogeneous selection. Clusters of genotypes that are reproductively Severine Vuilleumier, isolated from other clusters can persist when migration distances are restricted such University of Lausanne, Switzerland that the number of mating partners is below about 350 individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Color Genes of Speciation in Plants
    COMMENTARY The Color Genes of Speciation in Plants Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos1 The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, St. Lucia QLD 4072, Australia The genes underlying speciation remain largely undiscov- Pollinator isolation, a common prezygotic isolating barrier ered. An article published in this issue of GENETICS presents in flowering plants, reduces gene flow between populations results related to “Genetic Dissection of a Major Anthocya- because different pollinators (e.g.,birdsvs. bees) or the same nin QTL Contributing to Pollinator-Mediated Reproductive pollinator (pollinator constancy) transfer pollen predominantly ” Isolation Between Sister Species of Mimulus. Yuan et al. between conspecific and not heterospecific flowers (Bradshaw (2013) provide compelling evidence that the R3 MYB gene and Schemske 2003; Hopkins and Rausher 2012). In recent causes differences in anthocyanin concentration in the flow- ers of Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis, and is in fact likely years, a number of studies have demonstrated that shifts responsible for pollinator-mediated reproductive isolation in in flower color are common in a variety of plant lineages areas where the two species co-occur. This commentary dis- (Rausher 2008) and that some of them cause changes in cusses general implications from the results of Yuan et al. pollinatorbehaviorleadingtopollinator isolation (Hopkins (2013), and frames them in terms of both the genetic basis and Rausher 2012). However, very few studies have found of color and species evolution. the genes responsible for flower-color variation associated with demonstrated cases of plant speciation (Rieseberg OLORS in nature bring partners together (Darwin 1871), and Blackman 2010). For instance, Hopkins and Rausher Csignal distaste to predators (Bates 1862), and create in- (2011) identified genetic changes in two genes involved in teractions between radically different organisms (e.g., Bawa the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (ABP) that cause 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Sterility and Segregation Distortion in Drosophila Pseudoobscura and Drosophila Persimilis
    Hybrid Sterility and Segregation Distortion in Drosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimilis by Shannon Rose McDermott University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Beth Sullivan ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Amy Bejsovec Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program of Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 ABSTRACT Hybrid Sterility and Segregation Distortion in Drosophila Pseudoobscura and Drosophila Persimilis by Shannon Rose McDermott University Program in Genetics and Genomics Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Beth Sullivan ___________________________ John Willis ___________________________ Amy Bejsovec An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University Program in Genetics and Genomics in the Graduate School of Duke University 2012 Copyright by Shannon McDermott 2012 Abstract Speciation has occurred countless times throughout history, and yet the genetic mechanisms that lead to speciation are still missing pieces. Here, we describe the genetics of two processes that can act alone or together to cause speciation: hybrid sterility and meiotic drive. We use the Drosophila pseudoobscura /D, persimilis species as a model system to study these processes. We expanded on a prior study and saw little variation in strength of previously known hybrid sterility alleles between distinct strains of D. persimilis and the Bogota subspecies of D. pseudoobscura . Introgression of an autosomal, noninverted hybrid sterility allele from the USA subspecies of D. pseudoobscura into D. persimilis demonstrated that the D.
    [Show full text]
  • Watson Uta 2502D 12687.Pdf (6.504Mb)
    THE GENETICS OF HYBRID INCOMPATIBILITY EARLY IN THE ‘SPECIATION CONTINUUM’ by ERIC T. WATSON Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2014 Copyright © by Eric T. Watson 2014 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Jeffery Demuth, for his guidance and caring, for patiently correcting my writing and financially supporting my research, and providing me with an excellent atmosphere for doing research. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Esther Betran, Dr. Cedric Feschotte, Dr. John “Trey” Fondon III, and Dr. Andre Pires Da Silva for guiding my research for the past several years and helping me to develop my background in molecular and population genetics, evolutionary biology, and genome biology. Special thanks goes to Dr. Todd Castoe, who was willing to participate in my final defense committee at the last moment. I would also like to thank my parents, and sister, and my girlfriend Laura Drzich who all gave me their loving support. Many thanks to Nick Long, Diego Martin-Perez, Emmanuela Mujica, and other members of Dr. Demuth’s laboratory for helping me with beetle maintenance and bench-work. My research would not have been possible without their kind help. Thanks to Heath Blackmon, Jacobo Reyes Velasco, and David Sanchez, who entertained many questions with patience and provided loving friendship. Very special thanks goes to Dr. Mohamed A.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Consequences of Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila
    Causes and Consequences of Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila by Laurie Sherie Stevison Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Corbin D. Jones ___________________________ Thomas Mitchell-Olds ___________________________ Gregory Wray ___________________________ David MacAlpine Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 ABSTRACT Causes and Consequences of Recombination Rate Variation in Drosophila by Laurie Sherie Stevison Department of Biology Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Mohamed Noor, Supervisor ___________________________ Corbin D. Jones ___________________________ Thomas Mitchell-Olds ___________________________ Gregory Wray ___________________________ David MacAlpine An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Biology in the Graduate School of Duke University 2011 Copyright by Laurie Sherie Stevison 2011 Abstract Recombination occurs during meiosis to produce new allelic combinations in natural populations, and thus strongly affects evolutionary processes. The model system Drosophila has been crucial for understanding the mechanics underlying recombination and assessing the association between recombination rate and several
    [Show full text]
  • Fredric J. Janzen
    FREDRIC J. JANZEN Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Organismal Biology OFFICE: (515) 294-4230 251 Bessey Hall LAB: (515) 294-9347 Iowa State University (ISU) FAX: (515) 294-1337 Ames, IA 50011-1020 USA E-MAIL: [email protected] URL: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~fjanzen/homepage.html EDUCATION: 1992 Ph.D., Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago (with Stevan J. Arnold) 1987 M.S., Zoology, Colorado State University (with Gary C. Packard) 1985 B.A., Biology (summa cum laude), North Central College (with Thomas A. Williams) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 2013-15 Strengthening the Professoriate (Broader Impacts) Faculty Leader, ISU 2007-08 NSF ADVANCE Professor, ISU 2006-08 Chair, Interdepartmental Genetics Graduate Program, ISU 2004-06 Associate Chair, Interdepartmental Genetics Graduate Program, ISU 2004-08 Curator, Amphibian and Reptile Research Collection, ISU 2004 Courtesy Research Associate, Center for Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Oregon 2005-now Full Professor, Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Organismal Biology, College of Agriculture & Life Sciences (CALS), ISU 2000-05 Associate Professor (as above) 1994-00 Assistant Professor (as above, but instead in Department of Zoology & Genetics) 1998-99 Visiting Assistant Researcher, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California-Irvine 1992-94 Center for Population Biology Postdoctoral Fellow, Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis 1992 Visiting Professor, “Tropical Biology: An Ecological Approach”, Course #92-1,
    [Show full text]