Metrication Leaders Guide This Resource Book Will Help Make Your Inevitable Upgrade to the Metric System Easy, Smooth, Cheap, and Fast
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
5 Military Rucking Rules Every Backpacker Should Know 1. One
5 Military Rucking Rules Every Backpacker Should Know The military has spent years studying the best way to move under a load (aka “rucking”). Here are 5 military rucking rules that translate well to hikers. “Rucking” is the military term for hiking under load. As you can imagine, this is a huge issue for the military, as soldiers must wear body armor and carry weapons, ammo, water, communications equipment, and other gear as they conduct patrols and missions. Rucking performance and injury prevention are hugely important for military operations and personnel. Movement over ground under load is also a key for hiking and backpacking. In reviewing the research the military has already done on this subject, we discovered five rules. Read on to make sure you’re following these military rucking rules on your next backcountry adventure. 1. One pound on your feet equals five pounds on your back. This old backpacking thumb rule holds true, according to a 1984 study from the U.S. Army Research Institute. They tested how much more energy was expended with different footwear (boots and shoes) and concluded that it take 4.7 to 6.4 times as much energy to move at a given pace when weight is carried on the shoe versus on the torso. In practical terms, this means you could carry half a gallon more of water (a little over 4 pounds) if you buy boots that are a pound lighter, which isn’t hard to do; and that’s a lot of water. Now imagine the energy savings of backpacking in light trail running shoes rather than heavy, leather backpacking boots over the course of 7- day backpacking trip. -
Stone Preservatives : Methods of Laboratory Testing and Preliminary
°" <*« <">, \ tf'V, CO NBS TECHNICAL NOTE 941 \ U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards Stone Preservatives: Methods of Laboratory Testing and Preliminary Performance Criteria ,2 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS 1 The National Bureau of Standards was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research, the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the Office for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics — Electricity — Mechanics -
American and BRITISH UNITS of Measurement to SI UNITS
AMERICAN AND BRITISH UNITS OF MEASUREMENT TO SI UNITS UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNIT & ABBREVIATION SI UNITS CONVERSION* UNITS OF LENGTH UNITS OF MASS 1 inch = 40 lines in 2.54 cm 0.393701 1 grain gr 64.7989 mg 0.0154324 1 mil 25.4 µm 0.03937 1 dram dr 1.77185 g 0.564383 1 line 0.635 mm 1.57480 1 ounce = 16 drams oz 28.3495 g 0.0352739 1 foot = 12 in = 3 hands ft 30.48 cm 0.0328084 1 pound = 16 oz lb 0.453592 kg 2.204622 1 yard = 3 feet = 4 spans yd 0.9144 m 1.09361 1 quarter = 28 lb 12.7006 kg 0.078737 1 fathom = 2 yd fath 1.8288 m 0.546807 1 hundredweight = 112 lb cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 rod (perch, pole) rd 5.0292 m 0.198839 1 long hundredweight l cwt 50.8024 kg 0.0196841 1 chain = 100 links ch 20.1168 m 0.0497097 1 short hundredweight sh cwt 45.3592 kg 0.0220462 1 furlong = 220 yd fur 0.201168 km 4.97097 1 ton = 1 long ton tn, l tn 1.016047 t 0.984206 1 mile (Land Mile) mi 1.60934 km 0.62137 1 short ton = 2000 lb sh tn 0.907185 t 1.102311 1 nautical mile (intl.) n mi, NM 1.852 km 0.539957 1 knot (Knoten) kn 1.852 km/h 0.539957 UNITS OF FORCE 1 pound-weight lb wt 4.448221 N 0.2248089 UNITS OF AREA 1 pound-force LB, lbf 4.448221 N 0.2248089 1 square inch sq in 6.4516 cm2 0.155000 1 poundal pdl 0.138255 N 7.23301 1 circular inch 5.0671 cm2 0.197352 1 kilogram-force kgf, kgp 9.80665 N 0.1019716 1 square foot = 144 sq in sq ft 929.03 cm2 1.0764 x 10-4 1 short ton-weight sh tn wt 8.896444 kN 0.1124045 1 square yard = 9 sq ft sq yd 0.83613 m2 1.19599 1 long ton-weight l tn wt 9.964015 kN 0.1003611 1 acre = 4 roods 4046.8 -
Dien Mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-Hist
Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 20.12.2010 BAYERISCHE AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN PHILOSOPHISCH-HISTORISCHE KLASSE ABHANDLUNGEN . NEUE FOLGE, HEFT 136 Revision Cornelia Meyer-Stoll Die Maß- und Gewichtsreformen in Deutschland im 19. Jahrhundert unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Rolle Carl August Steinheils und der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Vorgelegt von Knut Borchardt in der Sitzung vom 7. Mai 2010 MÜNCHEN 2010 VERLAG DER BAYERISCHEN AKADEMIE DER WISSENSCHAFTEN IN KOMMISSION BEIM VERLAG C. H. BECK MÜNCHEN Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 20.12.2010 ISSN 0005–710X ISBN 978 3 7696 0124 4 © Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, München 2010 Gesamtherstellung: Druckerei C. H. Beck, Nördlingen Gedruckt auf säurefreiem, alterungsbeständigem Papier (hergestellt aus chlorfrei gebleichtem Zellstoff) Printed in Germany Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 21.12.2010 Ludwig Thiersch: Carl August Ritter von Steinheil (1801–1870) Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften Revision Druckerei C.H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist. Abh. 136 ..................................... Revision, 21.12.2010 Druckerei C. H . Beck Medien mit Zukunft .................Meyer-Stoll, Phil.-hist..................... Abh. 136 Revision, 17.12.2010 -
Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties
ISBN 0 85403 604 0 © The Royal Society 2004 Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act (1998), no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publisher, or, in the case of reprographic reproduction, in accordance with the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency in the UK, or in accordance with the terms of licenses issued by the appropriate reproduction rights organization outside the UK. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the terms stated here should be sent to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6–9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Typeset in Frutiger by the Royal Society Proof reading and production management by the Clyvedon Press, Cardiff, UK Printed by Latimer Trend Ltd, Plymouth, UK ii | July 2004 | Nanoscience and nanotechnologies The Royal Society & The Royal Academy of Engineering Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties Contents page Summary vii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Hopes and concerns about nanoscience and nanotechnologies 1 1.2 Terms of reference and conduct of the study 2 1.3 Report overview 2 1.4 Next steps 3 2 What are nanoscience and nanotechnologies? 5 3 Science and applications 7 3.1 Introduction 7 3.2 Nanomaterials 7 3.2.1 Introduction to nanomaterials 7 3.2.2 Nanoscience in this area 8 3.2.3 Applications 10 3.3 Nanometrology -
Broadcast Announcing
Table of Contents Teaching and Learning The Metric System Unit 1 1 - Suggested Teaching Sequence 1 - Objectives 1 - Rules of Notation 1 - Metric Units, Symbols, and Referents 2 - Metric Prefixes 2 - Linear Measurement Activities 3 - Area Measurement Activities 5 - Volume Measurement Activities 7 - Mass (Weight) Measurement Activities 9 - Temperature Measurement Activities 11 Unit 2 12 - Objectives 12 - Suggested Teaching Sequence 12 - Metrics in this Occupation 12 - Metric Units For Broadcast Announcing 13 - Trying Out Metric Units 14 - Broadcasting With Metrics 15 Unit 3 16 - Objective 16 - Suggested Teaching Sequence 16 - Metric-Metric Equivalents 16 - Changing Units at Work 18 Unit 4 19 - Objective 19 - Suggested Teaching Sequence 19 - Selecting and Using Metric Instruments, Tools and Devices 19 - Which Tools for the Job? 20 - Measuring Up in Broadcast Announcing 20 Unit 5 21 - Objective 21 - Suggested Teaching Sequence 21 - Metric-Customary Equivalents 21 - Conversion Tables 22 - Any Way You Want It 23 Testing Metric Abilities 24 Answers to Exercises and Test 25 Tools and Devices List References TEACHING AND LEARNING THE METRIC SYSTEM This metric instructional package was designed to meet job-related Unit 2 provides the metric terms which are used in this occupation metric measurement needs of students. To use this package students and gives experience with occupational measurement tasks. should already know the occupational terminology, measurement terms, and tools currently in use. These materials were prepared with Unit 3 focuses on job-related metric equivalents and their relation the help of experienced vocational teachers, reviewed by experts, tested ships. in classrooms in different parts of the United States, and revised before distribution. -
Portland Stone: a Nomination for “Global Heritage Stone Resource” from the United Kingdom
221 by T. Hughes1 G.K. Lott2, M.J. Poultney3 and B.J. Cooper4 Portland Stone: A nomination for “Global Heritage Stone Resource” from the United Kingdom 1 Slate and Stone Consultants, Ceunant, Caenarfon, Gwynedd LL55 4SA, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] 2 British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Albion Stone plc, Robert Denholm House, Bletchingley Road, Nutfield, Surrey RH1 4HW, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected] 4 Barbara Hardy Institute, School of Natural & Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia. E-mail: [email protected] Portland Stone, a well known ooidal limestone of Criteria for GHSR recognition Jurassic age from the United Kingdom is here nominated The defining characteristics of a GHSR are succinctly addressed as a suitable “Global Heritage Stone Resource”. in the HSTG “Terms of Reference” that have been approved, following Portland Stone is considered to ideally fit the newly wide consultation, by IUGS at its Executive Committee Meeting in proposed designation as it has been utilised since Roman San Sebastian, Spain in February 2012. times in England and since the Middle Ages in the An approved GHSR nominee must have a cultural history construction of major historic buildings including St encompassing a significant period. The HSTG Terms of Reference advise that this period must be at least 50 years. Also crucial is that a Pauls Cathedral, British Museum and Bank of England GHSR needs to have been utilised in significant works, be they in in London. It was also the preferred building stone of Sir buildings, sculpture or utilitarian applications. -
Musings on the Planck Length Universe
Musings on the Planck Length Universe -How does matter, or how does a change move through space on the micro- level? The answer depends on how the structure of space and matter are defined at a certain order of magnitude and what are their properties at that level. We will assume that, on the micro-level, the limits of space are discrete, consisting of the smallest units possible. Therefore, in order to define the structure of space on this level it would be necessary to introduce a notion of an “elementary spatial unit” (ESU), the smallest part of space, some kind of spatial “atom”. This would be the smallest and indivisible finite part (cell) of space, defined only by size and position (neighborhoods). It doesn’t have any content, but it could be filled with some property like “matter” or “vacuum”. There are two possibilities in which a property can to move through space (change its position). One would be that an ESU itself, containing a certain property, moves between other ESU carrying its content like a fish moving through the water or a ball through the air. Another possibility would be that the positions of all the ESU don’t change while their content is moving. This would be like an old billboard covered with light bulbs, or a screen with pixels. The positions of the bulbs or pixels are fixed, and only their content (light) changes position from one bulb to the other. Here the spatial structure (the structure of positions) is fixed and it is only the property (the content) that changes positions, thus moving through space. -
Six Easy Roads to the Planck Scale
Six easy roads to the Planck scale Ronald J. Adler∗ Hansen Laboratory for Experimental Physics Gravity Probe B Mission, Stanford University, Stanford California 94309 Abstract We give six arguments that the Planck scale should be viewed as a fundamental minimum or boundary for the classical concept of spacetime, beyond which quantum effects cannot be neglected and the basic nature of spacetime must be reconsidered. The arguments are elementary, heuristic, and plausible, and as much as possible rely on only general principles of quantum theory and gravity theory. The paper is primarily pedagogical, and its main goal is to give physics students, non-specialists, engineers etc. an awareness and appreciation of the Planck scale and the role it should play in present and future theories of quantum spacetime and quantum gravity. arXiv:1001.1205v1 [gr-qc] 8 Jan 2010 1 I. INTRODUCTION Max Planck first noted in 18991,2 the existence of a system of units based on the three fundamental constants, G = 6:67 × 10−11Nm2=kg2(or m3=kg s2) (1) c = 3:00 × 108m=s h = 6:60 × 10−34Js(or kg m2=s) These constants are dimensionally independent in the sense that no combination is dimen- sionless and a length, a time, and a mass, may be constructed from them. Specifically, using ~ ≡ h=2π = 1:05 × 10−34Js in preference to h, the Planck scale is r r G G l = ~ = 1:6 × 10−35m; T = ~ = 0:54 × 10−43; (2) P c3 P c5 r c M = ~ = 2:2 × 10−8kg P G 2 19 3 The energy associated with the Planck mass is EP = MP c = 1:2 × 10 GeV . -
Weights and Measures Standards of the United States: a Brief History
1 .0 11 8 1.25 1.4 I 6_ DOCUMENT RESUME ED 142 418 SE 022 719 AUTHOE Judson, Lewis V. TITLE Weights and Measures Standards of the United States: A Brief History. Updated Edition. INSTITUTION National Bureau of Standards (DOC) ,Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NBS-SP-447 PUB DATE Mar 76 NOTE 42p.; Contains occasional small print; Photographs may not reproduce well AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock Number 003-0O3-01654-3, $1.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$2.06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Government Publications; History; *Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; *Science History; *Standards ABSTRACT This document was published by the National Bureau of Standards to meet the current demand for information on the history of weights and measures in the United States. It includes an illustrated discussion of this history through 1962 followed by an addendum covering the period 1963-1975. Appendices provide a bibliography and photographic copies of eight documents important to the development of official standards of measurement. (SD) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * -to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. *********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. -
Measurement Units Style Guide a Writer’S Guide to the Correct Usage of Metric Measurement Units
Measurement units style guide A writer’s guide to the correct usage of metric measurement units This guidance is based on British and internationally agreed standards and represents best practice. It gives advice on how to use and write metric units, mistakes to avoid, what to do about conversions, and where to find further information. A brief explanation of how the metric system works is also given. Some common units Basic rules name symbol Capitals and lower case millimetre mm Names of metric units, whether alone or combined with a prefix, always start with a lower case letter (except at centimetre cm length the beginning of a sentence) - e.g. metre, milligram, watt. metre m kilometre km The symbols for metric units are also written in lower case - except those that are named after persons - e.g. milligram mg m for metre, but W for watt (the unit of power, named after the Scottish engineer, James Watt). Note that this mass gram g rule applies even when the prefix symbol is in lower case, (weight) kilogram kg as in kW for kilowatt. The symbol for litre (L) is an exception. tonne t Symbols for prefixes meaning a million or more are square metre 2 m written in capitals, and those meaning a thousand or less area hectare ha are written in lower case - thus, mL for millilitre, kW for kilowatt, MJ for megajoule (the unit of energy). square kilometre km 2 Plurals millilitre mL or ml Symbols do not change and are never pluralised : 3 cubic centimetre cm 25 kg (but 25 kilograms) volume litre L or l cubic metre m3 Punctuation and spacing watt W Do not put a full stop (period) after a unit symbol (except power kilowatt kW at the end of a sentence). -
CAPACITY One Gallon Split Into Fourths Is Four Quarts
CAPACITY One gallon split into fourths is four quarts. Take that and divide by two and you got a pint. NAME: Split that pint up into halves and make a cup, DATE: and that cup will fit eight fluid ounces inside of it. One gallon is four quarts (or eight pints, or sixteen cups)! One quart is two pints (or four cups, or thirty-two fluid ounces)! WATCH VIDEO One pint is two cups (or sixteen fluid ounces)! One cup is eight fluid ounces! A gallon of milk split in fourths makes four quarts. Split a quart of milk in half; then a pint is what you’ll have, which can make two cups you see often when you drink your school milk carton. If you can drink the milk in eight sips, each is about an ounce going through your lips! Volume is a word that’s familiar, and capacity and volume are similar; and though it’s easy to assume, capacity’s not exactly volume. Capacity’s how much something can hold; the amount is always the same. Volume’s the measure of what’s inside, and that amount can change. Logo 1 www.numberock.com CAPACITY One gallon split into fourths is four . Take that and divide by two and you got a . NAME: Split that pint up into halves and make a , DATE: and that cup will fit eight inside of it. One gallon is quarts (or 8 pints, or 16 cups)! One quart is pints (or four cups, or thirty-two fluid ounces)! One pint is cups (or sixteen fluid ounces)! One cup is fluid ounces! A of milk split in fourths makes four quarts.