DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidential Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidential Documents Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, May 16, 2005 Volume 41—Number 19 Pages 767–806 VerDate Aug 04 2004 09:50 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P19MYF4.013 P19MYF4 Contents Addresses and Remarks Bill Signings See also Meetings With Foreign Leaders Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act Central American leaders, meeting—790 for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Congressional leaders, meeting—789 Tsunami Relief, 2005, statement—790 Georgia Discussion with civil society leaders in Communications to Federal Agencies Tbilisi, remarks with President Assignment of Function To Submit a Report Saakashvili—786 to the Congress, memorandum—803 Freedom Square in Tbilisi—787 Latvia Executive Orders Order of Three Stars, First-Class, Amendments to Executive Order 12788 presentation in Riga—767 Relating to the Defense Economic Remarks in Riga—772 Adjustment Program—792 National Association of Realtors—793 NCAA championship teams, spring and fall— Interviews With the News Media 799 News conferences Netherlands May 7 with President Vike-Freiberga of Netherlands American Cemetery and Latvia, President Ruutel of Estonia, and Memorial in Margraten—779 President Adamkus of Lithuania in Riga, Youth roundtable in Valkenburg, remarks Latvia—767 with Prime Minister Balkenende—777 May 10 with President Saakashvili of Radio address—772 Georgia in Tbilisi, Georgia—782 (Continued on the inside of the back cover.) Editor’s Note: The President was at Camp David, MD, on May 13, the closing date of this issue. Releases and announcements issued by the Office of the Press Secretary but not received in time for inclusion in this issue will be printed next week. WEEKLY COMPILATION OF Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Docu- PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS ments, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers for $80.00 per year Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Reg- ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign subscribers for ister, National Archives and Records Administration, Washing- $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of Documents, ton, DC 20408, the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Docu- Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The ments contains statements, messages, and other Presidential charge for a single copy is $3.00 ($3.75 for foreign mailing). materials released by the White House during the preceding The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is also week. available on the Internet on the GPO Access service at http:// The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is pub- www.gpo.gov/nara/nara003.html. lished pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Reg- ister Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15), under There are no restrictions on the republication of material regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the appearing in the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Docu- Federal Register, approved by the President (37 FR 23607; ments. 1 CFR Part 10). VerDate Aug 04 2004 09:50 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P19MYF4.013 P19MYF4 Contents—Continued Meetings With Foreign Leaders Proclamations—Continued Costa Rica, President Pacheco—790 National Hurricane Preparedness Week—788 Dominican Republic, President Fernandez Peace Officers Memorial Day and Police Reyna—790 Week—801 El Salvador, President Saca Gonzalez—790 World Trade Week—791 Estonia, President Ruutel—767 Georgia, President Saakashvili—782, 786, 787 Statements by the President Guatemala, President Berger—790 See also Bill Signings Honduras, President Maduro—790 Congressional action on the proposed Latvia ‘‘Emergency Supplemental Appropriations President Vike-Freiberga—767, 772 Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, Prime Minister Kalvitis—772 and Tsunami Relief, 2005’’—788 Lithuania, President Adamkus—767 Death of Lloyd Cutler—781 Netherlands Senate consideration of judicial nominees, Prime Minister Balkenende—777, 779 calling for prompt—782 Queen Beatrix—779 Nicaragua, President Bolanos—790 Supplementary Materials Russia, President Putin—781 Acts approved by the President—806 Checklist of White House press releases—806 Proclamations Digest of other White House National Defense Transportation Day and announcements—803 National Transportation Week—802 Nominations submitted to the Senate—805 VerDate Aug 04 2004 09:50 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P19MYF4.013 P19MYF4 VerDate Aug 04 2004 09:50 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P19MYF4.013 P19MYF4 VerDate Aug 04 2004 09:50 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 7969 Sfmt 7969 E:\PRESDOCS\P19MYF4.013 P19MYF4 newmail.eps Week Ending Friday, May 13, 2005 Remarks on Being Presented the President Vike-Freiberga. And we’re Order of Three Stars, First-Class in pleased that the cameras are now turned on Riga, Latvia Latvia while you are here. [Laughter] President Bush. That’s right. May 7, 2005 Q. Mr. President—— President Bush. Thank you all. We’ll have Madam President, I gratefully accept. I am ample opportunity in an open press con- so honored and so thrilled to be here in your ference. And I certainly wouldn’t want you beautiful country. to fire your best question here. [Laughter] I was telling the President that it’s such a joy to come to a country that loves and NOTE: The President spoke at approximately values freedom and to be in the presence 11:10 a.m. at Riga Castle. A tape was not available of a President who speaks so clearly about for verification of the content of these remarks. the need for people to be free and her rec- ognition that a free world will yield peace. The President’s News Conference And so Madam President, thank you for With President Vaira Vike-Freiberga your hospitality, and thank you so much for of Latvia, President Arnold Ruutel of this great honor. Appreciate it. Estonia, and President Valdas Adamkus of Lithuania in Riga NOTE: The President spoke at 9:55 a.m. at Riga Castle. In his remarks, he referred to President May 7, 2005 Vaira Vike-Freiberga of Latvia. A tape was not President Vike-Freiberga. Ladies and available for verification of the content of these gentlemen, thank you for coming to this joint remarks. press conference of the three Baltic Presi- dents and the President of the United States Remarks Following Discussions With of America. We have just had a meeting to- President Vaira Vike-Freiberga of gether and the most fruitful discussion about Latvia in Riga our transatlantic relationships and also on the relationship between the two institutions of May 7, 2005 which Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania have become members since the past year, the re- President Vike-Freiberga. We are, of lationship between NATO and the European course, very gratified for this sudden interest Union. in Latvia that we’re seeing among the jour- We are honored and pleased to have this nalists. [Laughter] And it’s truly a great pleas- opportunity to have a great leader from a ure to see these wonderful journalists coming great and powerful country come to our re- to my country and having a look around. And gion and show interest in what happens here Mr. President, I think that you have some- and to have this open and very frank debate thing to do with that. [Laughter] with the three Baltic Presidents. With this, President Bush. Well, thank you for hav- I pass the floor to the President of Lithuania, ing us, Madam President. It’s been a trip I’ve President Valdas Adamkus. really been anxious to fulfill. I admire your President Adamkus. Mr. President, la- leadership; I admire your country’s courage. dies and gentlemen, this was an extremely I love the fact that you’re a free nation and good meeting and at a very good time. We willing to speak out so clearly for freedom. are welcoming the President of the United So, thanks for the hospitality. States here; as I said, welcome back to the 767 VerDate Aug 04 2004 12:48 May 17, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\TEMP\P19MYT4.013 P19MYT4 768 May 7 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2005 shores of the Baltic Sea. And it was during tries do not enjoy even in the 21st century. the discussions we really touched on vital We reassure you that Estonia is willing to issues: the relationship between the United share its experiences with these countries States and the European continent as—in a that are going towards these goals. whole. We touched on issues concerning di- I want to thank those soldiers from Estonia rectly the relationship between Baltic States and the United States who are now fighting and, of course, on the global issues. in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Kosovo. Estonia is On the part of Lithuania, I have reassured very satisfied with the progress made in the President that we are staunch allies in Ukraine and Georgia and is prepared to con- a fight against terrorism. We will be standing tinue supporting their endeavors. shoulder-to-shoulder on general global issues We also talked about our relationship with concerning the humanity and especially in an Russia in our discussions. Not only Estonia event when we are celebrating the end of but in the interests of all countries, it is best World War II against—the victory against na- to have as a partner a stable and democratic zism and, at the same time, standing for the Russia who shares our values and is open for principles which are dear to the rest of the constructive cooperation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • News Digest on Georgia
    NEWS DIGEST ON GEORGIA May 13-15 Compiled by: Aleksandre Davitashvili Date: May 16, 2019 Foreign Affairs 1. Georgia negotiating with Germany, France, Poland, Israel on legal employment Georgia is negotiating with three EU member states, Germany, France and Poland to allow for the legal employment of Georgians in those countries, as well as with Israel, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Georgia reports. An agreement has already been achieved with France. ―Legal employment of Georgians is one of the priorities for the ministry of Foreign Affairs, as such deals will decrease the number of illegal migrants and boost the qualification of Georgian nationals,‖ the Foreign Ministry says. A pilot project is underway with Poland, with up to 45 Georgian citizens legally employed, the ministry says (Agenda.ge, May 13, 2019). 2. Georgia elected as United Nations Statistical Commission member for 2020-2023 Georgia was unanimously elected as a member of the United Nations Statistical Commission (UNSC) for a period of four years, announces the National Statistics Office of Georgia (Geostat). The membership mandate will span from 2020-2023. A total of eight new members of the UNSC were elected for the same period on May 7 in New York at the meeting of the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (Agenda.ge, May 14, 2019). 3. President of European Commission Tusk: 10 years on there is more Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine in EU President of the European Commission Donald Tusk stated on the 10th anniversary of the EU‘s Eastern Partnership format that there is more Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Countries' Voting Patterns on Human Rights and Human
    12 Atlantic countries’ voting patterns on human rights and human security at the United Nations: the cases of Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti, Iran and Syria Susanne Gratius Associate Research Fellow, FRIDE ABSTRACT An analysis of the voting patterns at the United Nations (UN) on human rights and human security helps identify points of convergence or divergence among the countries of the Atlantic basin with regard to values and approaches to international crises. This paper explores if such countries, or groups of countries within the Atlantic basin, share political concepts and values. Based on four case studies – Iran, Syria, Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire – the paper assesses the similarities and differences regarding conflict resolution and responses to massive human rights violations. The first section reviews the current debate over the UN principle of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P), notably in relation to the Brazilian concept of “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP). It looks at the perceptions of Atlantic countries, groups and alliances on issues of national sovereignty, sanctions and military interventions authorized by the UN Security Council (UNSC). The second section focuses on the initiatives and positions of Atlantic countries and regional organizations and their alignments at the UN Security Council, the UN General Assembly, and the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). The section concentrates on their voting patterns concerning four cases in particular: two outside the Atlantic space (Syria and Iran) and two inside (Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire). These four countries have been selected because they represent different types of conflicts: Iran and Syria are international hotspots and suppose, albeit for very different reasons, potential threats for regional peace and global stability; Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire rank high on the list of fragile states and the international community has been highly engaged in crisis management and stabilization in these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Governing Council of the United Nations Environment
    UNITED NATIONS EP UNEP/GCSS.IX/11 Distr.: General Governing Council 16 March 2006 of the United Nations Environment Programme Original: English Ninth special session of the Governing Council/ Global Ministerial Environment Forum Dubai, 7–9 February 2006 Proceedings of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its ninth special session Introduction The ninth special session of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held at the Dubai International Convention Centre in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from 7 to 9 February 2006. It was convened in pursuance of paragraph 1 (g) of Governing Council decision 20/17 of 5 February 1999, entitled “Views of the Governing Council on the report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; Governing Council decision 23/12 of 7 April 2005, entitled “Provisional agendas, dates and venues of the ninth special session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum and the twenty-fourth session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum”, paragraph 6 of General Assembly resolution 53/242 of 28 July 1999, entitled “Report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; and paragraph 5 of General Assembly resolution 40/243 of 18 December 1985, entitled “Pattern of conferences”; and in accordance with rules 5 and 6 of the rules of procedure of the Governing Council. I. Opening of the session A. Ceremonial opening 1. The ceremonial opening of the ninth special session of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held on Monday, 6 February 2006, in conjunction with the award ceremony for the third Zayed International Prize for the Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech and Xenophobia
    HATE SPEECH AND XENOPHOBIA მედიის განვითარების ფონდი MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDADTION MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION HATE SPEECH XENOPHOBIA MEDIA MONITORING REPORT 2014-2015 MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION Author: TAMAR KINTSURASHVILI Researchers: SOPHO GOGADZE, TATA KAPIANIDZE, TAMUNA KANDELAKI Design: BESO DANELIA, IBDESIGN The report is prepared by Media Development Foundation within the framework of the project “Advancing National Integra- tion in Georgia” implemented by United Nations Association of Georgia with the support of the United States Agency for In- ternational Development. The content of the report is responsibility of Media Development Foundation and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID and UNAG. © 2015, MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION WWW.MDFGEORGIA.GE ISBN 978-9941-0-7733-3 INTRODUCTION The Media Development Foundation (MDF) has conducted media monitoring within the framework of Advancing National Integration in Georgia program. The aim of monitoring is to identify sources of hate speech, xenophobia, homophobia, gender discrimination and stereotyping, and anti-Western attitudes in media and public domain, in general. This study covers the period of one year (17 February 2014 –18 February 2015) and it exposes hate speech and discrimination on various grounds. The monitoring report represents a set of three editions: the first edition combines expressions of hate speech and xenophobia. For its part, the section on xenophobia is divided into subsections on a) various ethnic and national groups; b) Turkophobia/Islamophobia; c) Armenophobia; and d) religious discrimination. The second edition covers homophobic, discriminatory and stereotyped approaches to gender identity. The third edition reflects ant-Western attitudes. All the three editions have identical structure arranged according to the following sources: media, political parties and public organizations affiliated thereof, representatives of current and former authorities, religious servants, and other representatives of public i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – from Ideas to Operationality
    Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – From Ideas to Operationality Marco Marchetti (ed.) EFI Proceedings No. 51, 2004 European Forest Institute IUFRO Unit 8.07.01 European Environment Agency IUFRO Unit 4.02.05 IUFRO Unit 4.02.06 Joint Research Centre Ministero della Politiche Accademia Italiana di University of Florence (JRC) Agricole e Forestali – Scienze Forestali Corpo Forestale dello Stato EFI Proceedings No. 51, 2004 Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – From Ideas to Operationality Marco Marchetti (ed.) Publisher: European Forest Institute Series Editors: Risto Päivinen, Editor-in-Chief Minna Korhonen, Technical Editor Brita Pajari, Conference Manager Editorial Office: European Forest Institute Phone: +358 13 252 020 Torikatu 34 Fax. +358 13 124 393 FIN-80100 Joensuu, Finland Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.efi.fi/ Cover illustration: Vallombrosa, Augustus J C Hare, 1900 Layout: Kuvaste Oy Printing: Gummerus Printing Saarijärvi, Finland 2005 Disclaimer: The papers in this book comprise the proceedings of the event mentioned on the back cover. They reflect the authors' opinions and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Forest Institute. © European Forest Institute 2005 ISSN 1237-8801 (printed) ISBN 952-5453-04-9 (printed) ISSN 14587-0610 (online) ISBN 952-5453-05-7 (online) Contents Pinborg, U. Preface – Ideas on Emerging User Needs to Assess Forest Biodiversity ......... 7 Marchetti, M. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 9 Session 1: Emerging User Needs and Pressures on Forest Biodiversity De Heer et al. Biodiversity Trends and Threats in Europe – Can We Apply a Generic Biodiversity Indicator to Forests? ................................................................... 15 Linser, S. The MCPFE’s Work on Biodiversity .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic
    NATO’s Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic Era F. Stephen Larrabee Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-C-96-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larrabee, F. Stephen. NATO’s Eastern agenda in a new strategic era / F. Stephen Larrabee. p. cm. “MR-1744.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3467-7 (pbk.) 1. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Military policy. 2. Former communist countries—Military relations—Europe. 3. Europe—Military relations—Former communist countries. 4. United States—Military policy. 5. World politics—21st century. I. Title. UA646.8.L37 2003 355'.031'0918210947—dc22 2003017570 Cover photo courtesy of NATO photos, www.nato.int. Press Point between President Vaclav Havel (right) and NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson (left) at the Prague Castle. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2003 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia by Michael Hikari Cecire Capital: Tbilisi Population: 3.7 Million GNI/Capita, PPP: US$7,510
    Georgia By Michael Hikari Cecire Capital: Tbilisi Population: 3.7 million GNI/capita, PPP: US$7,510 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores NIT Edition 2016 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2017 Electoral 4.75 5.25 5.25 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Process Civil Society 3.50 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 3.75 Independent 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.25 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 Media National Democratic 5.75 6.00 6.00 5.75 5.75 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 Governance Local Democratic 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 Governance Judicial Framework and 4.75 4.75 4.75 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.75 Independence Corruption 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 4.50 Democracy 4.79 4.93 4.93 4.86 4.82 4.75 4.68 4.64 4.61 4.61 Score NOTE: The ratings reflect the consensus of Freedom House, its academic advisers, and the author(s) of this report. The opinions expressed in this report are those of the author(s). The ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 representing the highest level of democratic progress and 7 the lowest.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Russia Locked Into Confrontation
    BRIEFING The EU and Russia Locked into confrontation SUMMARY Following the post-Cold War reset of the 1990s, EU-Russia relations have become increasingly tense. Although initially seen as a pro-Western reformer, since the start of his first presidency in 2000 Vladimir Putin has shown increasingly authoritarian tendencies, and his efforts to assert Russian influence over post-Soviet neighbours threaten the sovereignty of those states. Russia's 2008 war against Georgia led to no more than a temporary cooling of relations with the European Union (EU). However, its 2014 annexation of Crimea caused a more permanent rupture. Responding to Russian aggression in Ukraine, the EU adopted hard-hitting sanctions. In 2016, the EU decided to base its Russia policy on five principles, which remain as valid as ever in 2020. They are: insistence on full implementation of the Minsk Agreements on eastern Ukraine as a condition for lifting sanctions against Russia; efforts to strengthen relations with Russia's former Soviet neighbours; greater EU resilience to Russian threats; selective engagement with Russia on certain issues such as counter-terrorism; and support for EU-Russia people-to-people contacts. After six years of deadlock, French president Emmanuel Macron is among those calling for renewed EU-Russia dialogue. Improved relations between Ukraine and Russia following the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in spring 2019 raised hopes of a solution to the Donbass conflict, which is still the main obstacle to better relations between the two sides. However, there is still no sign of a breakthrough. In this Briefing • How did we get here? • The five guiding principles of the EU's Russia policy • What next for EU-Russia relations? Queen Louise Bridge, on the Russian-Lithuanian border.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEM in Its Tenth Year Looking Back, Looking Forward
    ASEM in its Tenth Year Looking Back, Looking Forward An evaluation of ASEM in its first decade and an exploration of its future possibilities European Background Study March 2006 University of Helsinki Network for European Studies ASEM in its Tenth Year: Looking Back, Looking Forward An evaluation of ASEM in its first decade and an exploration of its future possibilities EUROPEAN BACKGROUND STUDY Table of Contents Preface 5 Introduction 7 Chapter I History and Background 12 1. Before ASEM: Features of the EU-Asia Relationship during the Cold War era 12 1.1 General overview 12 1.2 Relations with individual countries 13 1.3 Interregional relations 15 2. The change: The EU’s new recognition of Asia, the New Asia Strategy (1994), and the birth of ASEM 16 2.1 “Towards a New Asia Strategy” 17 2.2 The role of leading EU Member States 19 2.3 Motivations for the creation of ASEM from the European perspective 22 2.4 The formulation of the official EU policy: constitutive decisions on ASEM 29 3. A brief overview of ten years of ASEM summitry 31 Chapter II Political dialogue 34 1. Human rights in the EU – Asia dialogue 37 1.1 Human rights in the ASEM process 38 1.2 International Criminal Court - Asia-Europe positions 45 2. The emerging role of security issues 47 2.1 Regional conflicts 48 2.2 War on terrorism 50 2.3 Non-proliferation and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) 53 2.4 Global threats of common concern 54 2 2.5 Security issues never discussed in the ASEM dialogue 57 2.6 Assessment of the security dialogue 58 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development
    A/CONF.199/20* United Nations Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August- 4 September 2002 A/CONF.199/20* Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 August- 4 September 2002 United Nations • New York, 2002 * Reissued for technical reasons. A/CONF.199/20* Note Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. A/CONF.199/20* United Nations publication Sales No. E.03.II.A.1 ISBN 92-1-104521-5 Contents Chapter Page I. Resolutions adopted by the Summit................................................ 1 1. Political Declaration.................................................... 1 2. Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development....... 6 3. Expression of thanks to the people and Government of South Africa ............ 73 4. Credentials of representatives to the World Summit on Sustainable Development.. 73 II. Attendance and organization of work .............................................. 74 A. Date and place of the Summit ................................................ 74 B. Attendance................................................................ 74 C. Opening of the Summit...................................................... 79 D. Election of the President and other officers of the Summit ......................... 79 E. Adoption of the rules of procedure ............................................ 80 F. Adoption of the agenda and other organizational matters .......................... 80 G. Accreditation of intergovernmental organizations ................................ 81 H. Organization of work, including the establishment of the Main Committee ..........
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Background and U.S. Policy
    Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Cory Welt Analyst in European Affairs August 21, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R44775 Russia: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Over the last five years, Congress and the executive branch have closely monitored and responded to new developments in Russian policy. These developments include the following: increasingly authoritarian governance since Vladimir Putin’s return to the presidential post in 2012; Russia’s 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimea region and support of separatists in eastern Ukraine; violations of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty; Moscow’s intervention in Syria in support of Bashar al Asad’s government; increased military activity in Europe; and cyber-related influence operations that, according to the U.S. intelligence community, have targeted the 2016 U.S. presidential election and countries in Europe. In response, the United States has imposed economic and diplomatic sanctions related to Russia’s actions in Ukraine and Syria, malicious cyber activity, and human rights violations. The United States also has led NATO in developing a new military posture in Central and Eastern Europe designed to reassure allies and deter aggression. U.S. policymakers over the years have identified areas in which U.S. and Russian interests are or could be compatible. The United States and Russia have cooperated successfully on issues such as nuclear arms control and nonproliferation, support for military operations in Afghanistan, the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs, the International Space Station, and the removal of chemical weapons from Syria. In addition, the United States and Russia have identified other areas of cooperation, such as countering terrorism, illicit narcotics, and piracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Country Report
    Informal Governance and Corruption – Transcending the Principal Agent and Collective Action Paradigms Georgia Country Report Alexander Kupatadze | July 2018 Basel Institute on Governance Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE This research has been funded by the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID) and the British Academy through the British Academy/DFID Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the British Academy or DFID. Dr Alexander Kupatadze, King's College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom, [email protected] 1 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Informal Governance and Corruption: Rationale and project background 3 1.2 Conceptual approach and methods 4 1.3 Informal governance in Georgia: clean public services coexist with collusive practices of elites 5 2 The Reform of the Georgian Public Registry 7 3 Evolution of state-business relations in Georgia: 9 3.1 The aftermath of the Rose Revolution: developmental patrimonialism or neoliberal economy? 10 3.2 Post-UNM era: continuity or change? 13 4 Ivanishvili and the personalised levers of informal power 15 4.1 Managing the blurred public/private divide: co-optation and control practices of the GD 16 4.2 Nepotism, cronyism and appointments in state bureaucracy: 19 5 Elections and informality in Georgia 20 6 Conclusions 22
    [Show full text]