DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidential Documents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidential Documents Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, February 28, 2005 Volume 41—Number 8 Pages 273–325 VerDate Aug 04 2004 10:26 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FEF4.025 P08FEF4 Contents Addresses and Remarks Interviews With the News Media—Continued See also Meetings With Foreign Leaders News conferences Belgium, remarks in Brussels—283 February 22 with European Union leaders Germany in Brussels, Belgium—296 Discussion with Chancellor Schroeder of February 22 with Secretary General de Germany and young professionals in Hoop Scheffer of the North Atlantic Mainz—307 Treaty Organization in Brussels, Luncheon hosted by Chancellor Schroeder Belgium—291 of Germany in Mainz—300 February 23 with Chancellor Schroeder of Remarks to U.S. troops at Wiesbaden Army Germany in Mainz, Germany—301 Airfield—308 February 24 with President Putin of Russia Radio address—282 in Bratislava, Slovakia—315 Slovakia, remarks in Bratislava—313 Joint Statements Communications to Congress President George W. Bush and President Cuba, letter on continuation and expansion of national emergency—274 Jacques Chirac: Lebanon—288 President George W. Bush and President Communications to Federal Agencies Vladimir V. Putin: Nuclear Security Assignment of Certain Functions Relating to Cooperation—322 Climate Change Reporting Activities, President George W. Bush and President memorandum—273 Vladimir V. Putin: Russia’s Accession to the Assignment of Reporting Function, World Trade Organization—321 memorandum—273 President George W. Bush and President Vladimir V. Putin: U.S.-Russian Energy Interviews With the News Media Cooperation—321 Exchanges with reporters United States and the European Union: Belgium, Brussels—289 Announcement on Iraq Conference—296 Slovakia, Bratislava—311 U.S.-German Joint Actions on Cleaner and Interview with European print journalists— More Efficient Energy, Development and 274 Climate Change—305 (Continued on the inside of the back cover.) WEEKLY COMPILATION OF Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Docu- PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS ments, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents will be furnished by mail to domestic subscribers for $80.00 per year Published every Monday by the Office of the Federal Reg- ($137.00 for mailing first class) and to foreign subscribers for ister, National Archives and Records Administration, Washing- $93.75 per year, payable to the Superintendent of Documents, ton, DC 20408, the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Docu- Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. The ments contains statements, messages, and other Presidential charge for a single copy is $3.00 ($3.75 for foreign mailing). materials released by the White House during the preceding The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is also week. available on the Internet on the GPO Access service at http:// The Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents is pub- www.gpo.gov/nara/nara003.html. lished pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Reg- ister Act (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C. Ch. 15), under There are no restrictions on the republication of material regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the appearing in the Weekly Compilation of Presidential Docu- Federal Register, approved by the President (37 FR 23607; ments. 1 CFR Part 10). VerDate Aug 04 2004 11:09 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FEF4.025 P08FEF4 Contents—Continued Meetings With Foreign Leaders Notices European Union Continuation of the National Emergency European Commission President Durao Relating to Cuba and the Emergency Barroso—296 Authority Relating to the Regulation of the European Council President Juncker—296 Anchorage and Movement of Vessels—273 European Council Secretary General Solana—296 Statements by the President France, President Chirac—288, 289 Pope John Paul II—323 Germany, Chancellor Schroeder—300, 301, 305, 307 Supplementary Materials North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Secretary Acts approved by the President—325 General de Hoop Scheffer—291 Checklist of White House press releases—325 Russia, President Putin—315, 321, 322 Digest of other White House Slovakia, Prime Minister Dzurinda—311, 313 announcements—323 United Kingdom, Prime Minister Blair—290 Nominations submitted to the Senate—324 VerDate Aug 04 2004 10:26 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FEF4.025 P08FEF4 VerDate Aug 04 2004 10:26 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FEF4.025 P08FEF4 VerDate Aug 04 2004 10:26 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 7969 Sfmt 7969 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FEF4.025 P08FEF4 newmail.eps Week Ending Friday, February 25, 2005 Memorandum on Assignment of 108–447). Heads of departments and agen- Reporting Function cies shall furnish promptly to the Director February 17, 2005 of the Office of Management and Budget, to the extent permitted by law, information Memorandum for the Director of the the Director requests to perform such func- National Science Foundation tion. Any reference in this memorandum to the Subject: Assignment of Reporting Function provision of any Act shall be deemed to in- By the authority vested in me as President clude references to any hereafter enacted by the Constitution and the laws of the provision of law that is the same or substan- United States, including section 301 of title tially the same as such provision. 3, United States Code, I hereby assign to you You are authorized and directed to publish the functions conferred upon the President this memorandum in the Federal Register. by Public Law 98–373 (15 U.S.C. 4107(b) and 4108(a)), to provide the specified report George W. Bush and plan to the Congress. You are authorized and directed to publish NOTE: An original was not available for this memorandum in the Federal Register. verification of the content of this memorandum. George W. Bush This item was not received in time for publication in the appropriate issue. NOTE: This memorandum was released by the Of- fice of the Press Secretary on February 18. An original was not available for verification of the Notice—Continuation of the content of this memorandum. This item was not National Emergency Relating to received in time for publication in the appropriate Cuba and the Emergency Authority issue. Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels Memorandum on Assignment of February 18, 2005 Certain Functions Relating to Climate Change Reporting Activities On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address February 18, 2005 the disturbance or threatened disturbance of Memorandum for the Director of the Office international relations caused by the Feb- of Management and Budget ruary 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed U.S.-registered Subject: Assignment of Certain Functions civilian aircraft in international airspace Relating to Climate Change Reporting north of Cuba. In July 1996 and on subse- Activities quent occasions, the Cuban government stat- By the authority vested in me as President ed its intent to forcefully defend its sov- by the Constitution and the laws of the ereignty against any U.S.-registered vessels United States, including section 301 of title or aircraft that might enter Cuban territorial 3, United States Code, I hereby assign to you waters or airspace while involved in a flotilla the function of the President under section or peaceful protest. Since these events, the 576(b) of the Foreign Operations, Export Fi- Cuban government has not demonstrated nancing, and Related Programs Appropria- that it will refrain from the future use of reck- tions Act, 2005 (Division D of Public Law less and excessive force against U.S. vessels 273 VerDate Aug 04 2004 10:45 Mar 01, 2005 Jkt 205250 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 1244 Sfmt 1244 E:\PRESDOCS\P08FET4.025 P08FET4 274 Feb. 18 / Administration of George W. Bush, 2005 or aircraft that may engage in memorial ac- of its declaration, the President publishes in tivities or peaceful protest north of Cuba. On the Federal Register and transmits to the February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, Congress a notice stating that the emergency the scope of the national emergency was ex- is to continue in effect beyond the anniver- panded in order to deny monetary and mate- sary date. In accordance with this provision, rial support to the repressive Cuban govern- I have sent the enclosed notice to the Federal ment, which had taken a series of steps to Register for publication, which states that the destabilize relations with the United States, emergency declared with respect to the Gov- including threatening to abrogate the Migra- ernment of Cuba’s destruction of two un- tion Accords with the United States and to armed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in close the United States Interests Section. international airspace north of Cuba on Feb- Further, Cuba’s most senior officials repeat- ruary 24, 1996, as amended and expanded edly asserted that the United States intended on February 26, 2004, is to continue in effect to invade Cuba, despite explicit denials from beyond March 1, 2005. the U.S. Secretaries of State and Defense Sincerely, that such action is planned. Therefore, in ac- George W. Bush cordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am NOTE: Identical letters were sent to J. Dennis continuing the national emergency with re- Hastert, Speaker of the House of Representatives, spect to Cuba and the emergency authority and Richard B. Cheney, President of the Senate. relating to the regulation of the anchorage An original was not available for verification of the content of this letter. This item was not re- and movement of vessels set out in Proclama- ceived in time for publication in the appropriate tion 6867 as amended and expanded by Proc- issue.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atlantic Countries' Voting Patterns on Human Rights and Human
    12 Atlantic countries’ voting patterns on human rights and human security at the United Nations: the cases of Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti, Iran and Syria Susanne Gratius Associate Research Fellow, FRIDE ABSTRACT An analysis of the voting patterns at the United Nations (UN) on human rights and human security helps identify points of convergence or divergence among the countries of the Atlantic basin with regard to values and approaches to international crises. This paper explores if such countries, or groups of countries within the Atlantic basin, share political concepts and values. Based on four case studies – Iran, Syria, Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire – the paper assesses the similarities and differences regarding conflict resolution and responses to massive human rights violations. The first section reviews the current debate over the UN principle of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P), notably in relation to the Brazilian concept of “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP). It looks at the perceptions of Atlantic countries, groups and alliances on issues of national sovereignty, sanctions and military interventions authorized by the UN Security Council (UNSC). The second section focuses on the initiatives and positions of Atlantic countries and regional organizations and their alignments at the UN Security Council, the UN General Assembly, and the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). The section concentrates on their voting patterns concerning four cases in particular: two outside the Atlantic space (Syria and Iran) and two inside (Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire). These four countries have been selected because they represent different types of conflicts: Iran and Syria are international hotspots and suppose, albeit for very different reasons, potential threats for regional peace and global stability; Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire rank high on the list of fragile states and the international community has been highly engaged in crisis management and stabilization in these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Governing Council of the United Nations Environment
    UNITED NATIONS EP UNEP/GCSS.IX/11 Distr.: General Governing Council 16 March 2006 of the United Nations Environment Programme Original: English Ninth special session of the Governing Council/ Global Ministerial Environment Forum Dubai, 7–9 February 2006 Proceedings of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its ninth special session Introduction The ninth special session of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held at the Dubai International Convention Centre in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from 7 to 9 February 2006. It was convened in pursuance of paragraph 1 (g) of Governing Council decision 20/17 of 5 February 1999, entitled “Views of the Governing Council on the report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; Governing Council decision 23/12 of 7 April 2005, entitled “Provisional agendas, dates and venues of the ninth special session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum and the twenty-fourth session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum”, paragraph 6 of General Assembly resolution 53/242 of 28 July 1999, entitled “Report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; and paragraph 5 of General Assembly resolution 40/243 of 18 December 1985, entitled “Pattern of conferences”; and in accordance with rules 5 and 6 of the rules of procedure of the Governing Council. I. Opening of the session A. Ceremonial opening 1. The ceremonial opening of the ninth special session of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held on Monday, 6 February 2006, in conjunction with the award ceremony for the third Zayed International Prize for the Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Kit
    15YEARS PRESENTATION KIT TURKISH POLICY QUARTERLY PRESENTATION KIT MARCH 2017 QUARTERLY Table of Contents What is TPQ? ..............................................................................................................4 TPQ’s Board of Advisors ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������5 Strong Outreach ........................................................................................................ 7 Online Blog and Debate Sections ..........................................................................8 TPQ Events ...............................................................................................................10 TPQ in the Media ..................................................................................................... 11 Support TPQ .............................................................................................................14 Premium Sponsorship ............................................................................................ 15 Print Advertising .......................................................................................................18 Premium Sponsor ...................................................................................................19 Advertiser ................................................................................................................. 20 Online Advertising ................................................................................................... 21
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands and Nato
    THE NETHERLANDS AND NATO by Ramses A. Wessel, Professor of the Law of the European Union and other International Organizations, University of Twente, Centre for European Studies, The Netherlands A. Joining NATO: Constitutional Questions and Parliamentary Involvement 1. The Relation between the Legal Order of the Netherlands and the International Legal Order In order to understand the relationship between the Netherlands and NATO, one should be aware of the general, somewhat exceptional, relationship this country has with international law and international institutions. Traditionally, the Netherlands has an open attitude towards the international legal order. Its culture of global merchandising ever since the 17th century de¿ ned its position in the world and allowed for other (cultural) inÀ uences to be easily accepted by the Dutch. Some claim that the open attitude may even be a sign of a lack of na- tional sentiments, and indeed, the symbols of national identity (such as the À ag or the national hymn) are perhaps less cherished than in other countries. Joseph Luns, Minister for Foreign Affairs from 1956-1971 and later Secretary General of NATO, used to joke that the open attitude simply follows from the fact that The Netherlands as a small country has a relatively large ‘abroad’. In any case, it is generally held that the strong support for international law follows from a combination of the fact the Dutch are a law-abiding people but at the same time – as a small trading country with insuf¿ cient individual military capacity – need the protection of international rules.1 The openness of the Netherlands’ consti- tutional order is part and parcel of the domestic legal culture and explains the limited discussion (or even the absence of a real debate) on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Secretaries-General the Legacies of Joseph Luns and Jaap De Hoop Scheffer
    NATO Secretaries-General The Legacies of Joseph Luns and Jaap de Hoop Scheffer Ryan C. Hendrickson With the end of Jaap de Hoop Scheffer’s term as NATO’s Secretary-General, the time is ripe for an initial assessment of his service as NATO’s chief diplomat. NATO’s secretary-general, an office that did not even exist until three years after the Alliance’s creation, has generated little academic scrutiny. In part, this dearth of research is understandable given the few official powers held by the Alliance’s political leader. The secretary-general is charged with promoting consensus among the Allies – a rather broad responsibility that provides few organisational tools to achieve this end. In addition, the secretary-general must oversee and manage Alliance summits and ministerial meetings, and chair meetings of the North Atlantic Council, but has no voting authority. Given this limited institutional authority, coupled with the political influence of the Alliance’s ‘great powers’ and the organisational authority wielded by NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), most histories of NATO provide little assessment of the secretary-general.1 Three individuals from the Netherlands: Dirk Stikker, Joseph Luns, and de Hoop Scheffer, have served as NATO’s chief political leader, yet each has left his own, quite different, legacy. De Hoop Scheffer’s record, at least at this first early juncture, is very different from those of his Cold War predecessors, and especially from that of his Dutch predecessor, Joseph Luns, who was NATO’s longest serving secretary-general. This essay provides a short comparison of the legacies of Luns and de Hoop Scheffer.
    [Show full text]
  • Het Tijdschrift Dan Kunt U Deze Mailen Naar [email protected] 29 Nobelprijs 13 Dubbelinterview: Jaap De Hoop Scheffer
    cda.nl Nummer 5 | December 2009 h e t tijdschrift Themanummer Redactioneel & colofon Inhoudsopgave redactioneel Vrede INHOUD 8 Kerk in Nood De redactie van CDA.nl wenst u Kerk in Nood zet zich in gezegende Kerstdagen voor vervolgde christenen en alle goeds voor 2010 13 Dubbelinterview In dit nummer: 4 Uit de regio Jaap de Hoop Scheffer 5 Van de voorzitter 6 Interview: en Jack de Vries Ruben van Swieten 8 Kerk in Nood l O H 11 Premier IRK D 12 Gedachte: foto foto Maxime Verhagen Heeft u op- of aanmerkingen over CDA.nl – het tijdschrift dan kunt u deze mailen naar [email protected] 29 Nobelprijs 13 Dubbelinterview: Jaap de Hoop Scheffer Vrouw en Politiek Fotografie Niet alle artikelen in dit tijd- voor de vrede en Jack de Vries Colofon CDA Vrouwen ANP Photo, Harry Breugom, schrift vertolken noodzakelijker- 16 Onze man in … Afrika December 2009 Dirk Hol, iStockphoto wijs de standpunten van het CDA Op 10 december ontvangt y Jaargang 5 | nummer 5 Hoofdredactie of van de redactie. Alle bijdragen maur 17 Partijnieuws Michael Sijbom Aan dit nummer in CDA.nl zijn beschermd door Barack Obama de Nobelprijs is een uitgave voor de 25 Vrouw en politiek CDA.nl werkten verder mee het auteursrecht. Uit deze ANNEN leden van het CDA. De uitgave Eindredactie Jan Schinkelshoek en al onze uitgave mag daarom niets op voor de vrede wordt tenminste zes keer per jaar Lilian Madern en Marjolijn leden en vrijwilligers die deze enigerlei wijze worden overge- ANP | T 29 Nobelprijs voor de vrede verspreid in een oplage van ruim van der Stel uitgave mogelijk hebben nomen zonder voorafgaande foto zestigduizend exemplaren.
    [Show full text]
  • Pan-European Outreach
    ecfr.eu We are living through a global counter-revolution. The institutions and values of liberal internationalism are being eroded beneath our feet and societies are becoming increasingly polarised. The consensus for EU action is increasingly difficult to forge, but there is a way forward. In this new world, the European Council on Foreign Relations will take a bottom-up approach to building grassroots consensus for greater cooperation on European foreign and security policy. Our vision is to demonstrate that engaging in common European action remains the most effective way of protecting European citizens. But we will reach out beyond those already converted to our message, framing our ideas and calls for action in a way that resonates with key decision-makers and the wider public across Europe’s capitals. Mark Leonard, Director “ 9 November is one of these portentous dates which characterised German and European history. I feel you couldn’t have chosen a better day on which to launch the new European Council on Foreign Relations here in Berlin.” Frank-Walter Steinmeier President of Germany at ECFR Berlin, 2017 ecfr.eu OUR LEADERSHIP The European Council on Foreign Mark Leonard Relations (ECFR) is an award-winning Director think-tank that aims to conduct cutting-edge independent research in pursuit of a coherent, effective, Mark is the Director and co-founder of ECFR. He was and values-based European foreign chairman of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda policy. Council on Geoeconomics until 2016, director of foreign policy at the Centre for European Reform, and director of We provide an exclusive meeting the Foreign Policy Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Forming Coalitions in the Eu After Brexit
    FORMING COALITIONS IN THE EU AFTER BREXIT The Advisory Council on International Affairs is an advisory body for the Dutch ALLIANCES FOR A EUROPEAN UNION THAT government and parliament. In particular its reports address the policy of the Minister of MODERNISES AND PROTECTS Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Defence and the Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation. No. 108, July 2018 The Council will function as un umbrella body with committees responsible for human rights, peace and security, development cooperation and European integration. While retaining expert knowledge in these areas, the aim of the Council is to integrate the provision of advice. Its staff are: Robert Dekker, Jan Willem Glashouwer, Marja Kwast-van Duursen and André Westerink. ADVISORY COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS ADVISORY COUNCIL ON INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS P.O.BOX 20061, 2500 EB THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS ADVIESRAAD INTERNATIONALE VRAAGSTUKKEN AIV TELEPHONE +31(0)70 348 5108/60 60 [email protected] WWW.AIV-ADVICE.NL Members of the Advisory Council on International Affairs Chair Professor Jaap de Hoop Scheffer Vice-chair Professor Joris Voorhoeve Members Professor Tineke Cleiren Professor Joyeeta Gupta Professor Ernst Hirsch Ballin Professor Luuk van Middelaar Professor Mirjam van Reisen Monica Sie Dhian Ho Lieutenant-General (ret.) Marcel Urlings Executive Secretary Marja Kwast-van Duursen P.O. Box 20061 2500 EB The Hague The Netherlands telephone + 31 70 348 5108/6060 e-mail [email protected] www.aiv-advice.nl Members of the Committee on forming coalitions
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – from Ideas to Operationality
    Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – From Ideas to Operationality Marco Marchetti (ed.) EFI Proceedings No. 51, 2004 European Forest Institute IUFRO Unit 8.07.01 European Environment Agency IUFRO Unit 4.02.05 IUFRO Unit 4.02.06 Joint Research Centre Ministero della Politiche Accademia Italiana di University of Florence (JRC) Agricole e Forestali – Scienze Forestali Corpo Forestale dello Stato EFI Proceedings No. 51, 2004 Monitoring and Indicators of Forest Biodiversity in Europe – From Ideas to Operationality Marco Marchetti (ed.) Publisher: European Forest Institute Series Editors: Risto Päivinen, Editor-in-Chief Minna Korhonen, Technical Editor Brita Pajari, Conference Manager Editorial Office: European Forest Institute Phone: +358 13 252 020 Torikatu 34 Fax. +358 13 124 393 FIN-80100 Joensuu, Finland Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.efi.fi/ Cover illustration: Vallombrosa, Augustus J C Hare, 1900 Layout: Kuvaste Oy Printing: Gummerus Printing Saarijärvi, Finland 2005 Disclaimer: The papers in this book comprise the proceedings of the event mentioned on the back cover. They reflect the authors' opinions and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Forest Institute. © European Forest Institute 2005 ISSN 1237-8801 (printed) ISBN 952-5453-04-9 (printed) ISSN 14587-0610 (online) ISBN 952-5453-05-7 (online) Contents Pinborg, U. Preface – Ideas on Emerging User Needs to Assess Forest Biodiversity ......... 7 Marchetti, M. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 9 Session 1: Emerging User Needs and Pressures on Forest Biodiversity De Heer et al. Biodiversity Trends and Threats in Europe – Can We Apply a Generic Biodiversity Indicator to Forests? ................................................................... 15 Linser, S. The MCPFE’s Work on Biodiversity .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SECRETARY GENERAL LE SECRETAIRE GENERAL Jaap De Hoop Scheffer
    0S-JLJL-2004 19'-10 PRIU. OFF. SEC. GEN. NATO 32 2 7074609 P.02/03 SECRETARY GENERAL LE SECRETAIRE GENERAL Jaap de Hoop Scheffer SG(2004)0870 °7 J"'V 2004 v "\ I Many thanks for your recent letter regarding Afghanistan that reached me on the eve of the Istanbul Summit. „ I welcome your thoughts on this important topic which is of highest priority for our two organisations. You are, of course, aware that Afghanistan figured highly in our discussions at the level of Heads of State and Government We aJso had the honor to welcome President: Rarzai as a speciat guest at the meeting of the Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council. I can confirm that many of the concerns raised in your letter, from security issues to the slow pace of DDR, are shared by Allies and Partners alike^ That said, and following deliberations at highest levels, I am gjad jg^cpnfirm not only NATO's continuing commitment tp,Afghanistan and the°T^AF mission, but also an Increase'"iri the overall level our forces participating in ISAF. At Istanbul, NATO Heads of State "arid "Government approved a major expansion of NATO's role in the country in support of the Afghan authorities and have committed the resources needed to make this mission a success. In practice.JSAjMs in^he process of establishing a network in the North of the country. This expansion includes the Gnited Kingdom-led Provincial Reconstruction (PRJs) in lyiazar I Sharif^ and Meyrnana, and, in the near future, a.new edrPRTln^ Feyzabad, and a Netherlands-led PRT in feaghian.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic
    NATO’s Eastern Agenda in a New Strategic Era F. Stephen Larrabee Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited R Project AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-C-96-0001. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Larrabee, F. Stephen. NATO’s Eastern agenda in a new strategic era / F. Stephen Larrabee. p. cm. “MR-1744.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-8330-3467-7 (pbk.) 1. North Atlantic Treaty Organization—Military policy. 2. Former communist countries—Military relations—Europe. 3. Europe—Military relations—Former communist countries. 4. United States—Military policy. 5. World politics—21st century. I. Title. UA646.8.L37 2003 355'.031'0918210947—dc22 2003017570 Cover photo courtesy of NATO photos, www.nato.int. Press Point between President Vaclav Havel (right) and NATO Secretary General Lord Robertson (left) at the Prague Castle. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Stephen Bloodsworth © Copyright 2003 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval)
    [Show full text]
  • The EU and Russia Locked Into Confrontation
    BRIEFING The EU and Russia Locked into confrontation SUMMARY Following the post-Cold War reset of the 1990s, EU-Russia relations have become increasingly tense. Although initially seen as a pro-Western reformer, since the start of his first presidency in 2000 Vladimir Putin has shown increasingly authoritarian tendencies, and his efforts to assert Russian influence over post-Soviet neighbours threaten the sovereignty of those states. Russia's 2008 war against Georgia led to no more than a temporary cooling of relations with the European Union (EU). However, its 2014 annexation of Crimea caused a more permanent rupture. Responding to Russian aggression in Ukraine, the EU adopted hard-hitting sanctions. In 2016, the EU decided to base its Russia policy on five principles, which remain as valid as ever in 2020. They are: insistence on full implementation of the Minsk Agreements on eastern Ukraine as a condition for lifting sanctions against Russia; efforts to strengthen relations with Russia's former Soviet neighbours; greater EU resilience to Russian threats; selective engagement with Russia on certain issues such as counter-terrorism; and support for EU-Russia people-to-people contacts. After six years of deadlock, French president Emmanuel Macron is among those calling for renewed EU-Russia dialogue. Improved relations between Ukraine and Russia following the election of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in spring 2019 raised hopes of a solution to the Donbass conflict, which is still the main obstacle to better relations between the two sides. However, there is still no sign of a breakthrough. In this Briefing • How did we get here? • The five guiding principles of the EU's Russia policy • What next for EU-Russia relations? Queen Louise Bridge, on the Russian-Lithuanian border.
    [Show full text]