DOCSLIB.ORG

ASEM in Its Tenth Year: Looking Back, Looking Forward; (Ed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASEM in Its Tenth Year: Looking Back, Looking Forward; (Ed "European Background Study," ASEM in its Tenth Year: Looking Back, Looking Forward; (ed. Japan Center for International Exchange and University of Helsinki Network for European Studies), Tokyo: Japan Center for International Exchange, 2006, pp. 1-218. ASEM in its Tenth Year Looking Back, Looking Forward An evaluation of ASEM in its first decade and an exploration of its future possibilities European Background Study March 2006 University of Helsinki Network for European Studies Copyright 2006, Japan Center for International Exchange ASEM in its Tenth Year: Looking Back, Looking Forward An evaluation of ASEM in its first decade and an exploration of its future possibilities EUROPEAN BACKGROUND STUDY Table of Contents Preface 5 Introduction 7 Chapter I History and Background 12 1. Before ASEM: Features of the EU-Asia Relationship during the Cold War era 12 1.1 General overview 12 1.2 Relations with individual countries 13 1.3 Interregional relations 15 2. The change: The EU’s new recognition of Asia, the New Asia Strategy (1994), and the birth of ASEM 16 2.1 “Towards a New Asia Strategy” 17 2.2 The role of leading EU Member States 19 2.3 Motivations for the creation of ASEM from the European perspective 22 2.4 The formulation of the official EU policy: constitutive decisions on ASEM 29 3. A brief overview of ten years of ASEM summitry 31 Chapter II Political dialogue 34 1. Human rights in the EU – Asia dialogue 37 1.1 Human rights in the ASEM process 38 1.2 International Criminal Court - Asia-Europe positions 45 2. The emerging role of security issues 47 2.1 Regional conflicts 48 2.2 War on terrorism 50 2.3 Non-proliferation and weapons of mass destruction (WMD) 53 2.4 Global threats of common concern 54 2 2.5 Security issues never discussed in the ASEM dialogue 57 2.6 Assessment of the security dialogue 58 3. Multilateralism and the reform of the United Nations 60 4. Environmental issues 64 4.1 Overview 64 4.2 Assessment 68 5. Concluding remarks 69 Chapter III Economy and trade 72 1. Aims, objectives and expectations in the field of ASEM economy and trade 72 2. General assessment of achievements and initiatives related to economic cooperation, trade, investment and the participation of the private sectors 77 2.1 The Trade Facilitation Action Plan (TFAP) 77 2.2 The Investment Promotion Action Plan (IPAP) 81 2.3 The Asia-Europe Business Forum (AEBF) 84 2.4 The EU reaction to the Asian economic and financial crisis 89 2.5 “Track two” economic cooperation and think tank initiatives 91 3. ASEM in the bilateral and multilateral framework 93 3.1 Enhancement of existing bilateral country-to-country and region-to-region relations 93 3.2 ASEM in the multilateral order 98 4. Overview of trade and investment (FDI) relations between Europe and Asia 101 5. Concluding remarks 105 Chapter IV Social/cultural dialogue 111 1. General overview 111 2. Asia-Europe Foundation (ASEF) 114 3. Engaging civil society 118 4. Dialogue on cultures and civilizations 128 5. Other issues 131 6. Assessment and concluding remarks 133 3 Chapter V ASEM as A Part of the EU system 137 1. Introduction 137 2. ASEM in the overall EU-Asian relations 137 3. ASEM - institutional challenges in the EU 144 4. The Political Challenges of ASEM 147 5. Conclusions 150 Chapter VI Format, institutional questions and working methods 153 1. Introduction to the institutional framework in the pillars 154 2. Informality and the “Asian-style” approach 157 3. Management 162 3.1 Coordination 162 3.2 Representation and attendance 166 3.3 Meetings 169 4. Link between initiatives, declarations and follow-up 171 4.1 Initiatives 171 4.2 Chairman’s Statements and Political Declarations 177 5. Visibility and public awareness of ASEM 180 6. Enlargement 184 6.1 Overview 184 6.2 Challenges 186 Conclusion 193 Bibliography 199 4 Preface The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) celebrates its tenth anniversary in 2006. The Meeting’s founding father, Singapore’s former Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong, suggested in September 1994 to bridge the gap in interactions between Asia and Europe by establishing an institutional framework for the two regions to systematically engage each other. His idea came at the right time for Europe, since awareness had grown that “the rise of Asia is dramatically changing the world balance of economic power”, as the EU’s New Asia Strategy phrased it. The first Asia-Europe Meeting, held in Bangkok in March 1996, was heralded as a major success. Characterized by an optimistic spirit of co-operation the meeting was perceived as a first step towards filling in the “missing link” in the triadic economic international structure. The sixth ASEM Summit to be held in Helsinki in September 2006 will mark a decade of a multidimensional dialogue which has broadened far beyond the initial focus on economy and trade, and which has given rise to hundreds of wide-ranging collaborative initiatives between the two regions. Anniversaries provide excellent opportunities for a reflection on the past, present and future. Many participants directly involved in the ASEM process as well as outside observers deem the time ripe for an evaluation of the first decade of this still young interregional dialogue forum, and for a careful consideration of the process’s future possibilities. Has ASEM lived up to the initial expectations of the partnership? Are its working methods still as valid as ten years ago? Has it played a relevant role as a major international cooperation structure? Does ASEM at present reflect the full global strategic potential of Asia-Europe relations in general? In order to assess ASEM’s achievements and ascertain the way forward, Japan and Finland submitted a proposal, endorsed by the 7th ASEM Foreign Ministers Meeting (Kyoto, May 2005), to jointly produce an objective think-tank report. The present study is the European background analysis that formed the basis for the drafting of that joint report and common conclusions. It looks back on the Meeting’s history, philosophy, activities, position within the EU, and working methods in order to formulate recommendations for the future from a European perspective. Research for the study and analysis of the data took place between June 2005 and February 2006. Research material was gathered from EU-related sources, in 5 addition to publications by leading European experts. Interviews were conducted with EU officials, independent think tanks and key parties, and consultation of all the EU Members States took place through a written questionnaire. In addition an international conference, bringing together leading academics in the field of international relations and government officials involved in the ASEM process, was organized in September 2005 in Helsinki. The Finnish research team was led by Dr Teija Tiilikainen, Director of the University of Helsinki Network for European Studies and Dr Timo Kivimäki, Senior Researcher at the Nordic Institute of Asian Studies. The researchers were Dr Bart Gaens and M.Soc.Sc. Silja Keva from the University of Helsinki. The research group would like to express its sincere gratitude to all the EU and government officials, and to all the academic experts who provided guidance and insightful remarks through interviews and questionnaires. Special thanks are due to all the speakers, commentators and participants of the “Ten Years of ASEM” conference. The research team is responsible for all opinions expressed in this study, and also for any of its shortcomings and mistakes. Helsinki, March 2006. 6 Introduction The Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM) began in March 1996 with an inaugural summit of leaders from ASEAN, China, Japan and Korea, and from the EU member states and the European Commission. ASEM’s official goal was to achieve a new comprehensive “Asia-Europe Partnership for Greater Growth” and to strengthen multidimensional cooperation. For Europe the underlying logic was rooted in the grown awareness of Asia’s global economic weight and the inadequate involvement of the EU in Asia, particularly when compared with the US and its connection to the Asia-Pacific through APEC. The birth of ASEM in 1996 marked the turning of a new page in Asia-Europe relations, and was accompanied by great expectations. The ASEM dialogue forum, the instrument for this new start, was inaugurated as a new and innovative player in the field of interregional relations, displaying a distinct character. This individuality reveals itself first of all in membership, which is marked by a certain degree of asymmetry and exclusion. The original ASEM documents reveal an ambiguous relationship towards the agents of dialogue. The name Asia-Europe Meeting suggests that it aims to function as a forum for interregional cooperation between Asia and Europe. This interpretation is apparent in key documents such as the Asia-Europe Cooperation Framework (AECF). The reality is, of course, much more complex1. “Europe”, represented by the member states of the EU and the European Commission (a separate and equal partner in its own right), embodies a coherent regional agency on account of the EU’s institutional character. “Asia” on the other hand is represented by the ASEAN partners in addition to China, Japan and South-Korea, a grouping of countries which as ASEAN+3 forms the focal point for the emerging construction of an East Asian regional identity as a counterpart to Europe in ASEM. Nevertheless, the fact remains that the Asian agency is limited by the absence of an all-Asian organization that could be considered as a prerequisite for participation as a coherent and politically integrated bloc in ASEM. Furthermore with regard to membership, exclusion and the construction of difference are as at least as important as inclusion and official membership.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lao PDR's Way Into the ASEAN Single Market
    Lao PDR’s Way into the ASEAN Single Market The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) ‘AEC 2015’ – what does it mean? Towards the ASEAN Community: ASEAN has been founded in The year 2015 marks the formal establishment of the AEC. 1967, the ASEAN Free Trade Area has been established in 1992 ‘Launching the AEC’ is a major milestone that will allow ASEAN and Lao PDR became a member in 1997. The ASEAN integration to foster a common identity and create momentum for further process intensified since 2003: at the 9th ASEAN Summit, ASEAN economic integration, relying on strong regional frameworks. Member States (AMS) decided to establish the ASEAN communi- Declaring the AEC operational, however, is not the final culmina- ty, which includes the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), the tion of the ASEAN economic integration process: ASEAN integra- ASEAN Political-Security Community (ASPSC), and the ASEAN tion is an on-going, dynamic process that will continue beyond Socio-Cultural Community (ASCC). 2015, as emphasized in the new AEC Blueprint 2025. The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC): The AEC will be estab- Progress and Achievements in the Implemen- lished in 2015. The ASEAN Leaders adopted the AEC Blueprint at tation of the AEC the 13th ASEAN Summit in 2007 in Singapore, to serve as a coher- ent master plan guiding the establishment of the AEC. The AEC ASEAN has endorsed 3 main agreements in order to create the Blueprint 2015 envisions four pillars for economic integration: Single Market: the ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) in 2010, the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services (AFAS) in 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of ASEAN Free Trade Are to Its Members
    Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade Working Paper Series, No. 21, November 2006 Determinants of AFTA Members’ Trade Flows and Potential for Trade Diversion By Indira M. Hapsari and Carlos Mangunsong* *Indira M. Hapsari and Carlos Mangunsong are Research Assistant at the Department of Economics Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) and Teaching Assistant at the Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia, The views presented in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of CSIS, ARTNeT members, partners and the United Nations. This study was conducted as part of the Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT) initiative, aimed at building regional trade policy and facilitation research capacity in developing countries. This work was carried out with the aid of a grant from the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Canada. The technical support of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific is gratefully acknowledged. Any remaining errors are the responsibility of the authors. The authors may be contacted at [email protected] and [email protected] The Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade (ARTNeT) aims at building regional trade policy and facilitation research capacity in developing countries. The ARTNeT Working Paper Series disseminates the findings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about trade issues. An objective of the series is to get the findings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. ARTNeT working papers are available online at: www.artnetontrade.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Asean Treaties/Agreements And
    TABLE OF ASEAN TREATIES/AGREEMENTS AND RATIFICATION As of October 2012 Note: USA = Upon Signing the Agreement IoR = Instrument of Ratification Govts = Government EIF = Entry Into Force No. Title of the Agreement Place and Date Ratifying Date of Ratification EIF of Signing Country 1. Memorandum of Understanding among Siem Reap - - - the Governments of the Participating 29 August 2012 Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) on the Second Pilot Project for the Implementation of a Regional Self- Certification System 2. Memorandum of Understanding Phuket - - - between the Government of the Thailand Member States of the Association of 6 July 2012 Southeast Asian nations (ASEAN) and the Government of the People’s Republic of China on Health Cooperation 3. Joint Declaration of the ASEAN Defence Phnom Penh - - - Ministers on Enhancing ASEAN Unity for Cambodia a Harmonised and Secure Community 29 May 2012 4. ASEAN Agreement on Custom Phnom Penh - - - This Agreement shall enter into force, after 30 March 2012 all Member States have notified or, where necessary, deposited instruments of ratifications with the Secretary General of ASEAN upon completion of their internal procedures, which shall not take more than 180 days after the signing of this Agreement 5. Agreement between the Government of Phnom Penh - - - The Agreement has not entered into force the Republic of Indonesia and the Cambodia since Indonesia has not yet notified ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations 2 April 2012 Secretariat of its completion of internal 1 TABLE OF ASEAN TREATIES/AGREEMENTS AND RATIFICATION As of October 2012 Note: USA = Upon Signing the Agreement IoR = Instrument of Ratification Govts = Government EIF = Entry Into Force No.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Countries' Voting Patterns on Human Rights and Human
    12 Atlantic countries’ voting patterns on human rights and human security at the United Nations: the cases of Côte d’Ivoire, Haiti, Iran and Syria Susanne Gratius Associate Research Fellow, FRIDE ABSTRACT An analysis of the voting patterns at the United Nations (UN) on human rights and human security helps identify points of convergence or divergence among the countries of the Atlantic basin with regard to values and approaches to international crises. This paper explores if such countries, or groups of countries within the Atlantic basin, share political concepts and values. Based on four case studies – Iran, Syria, Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire – the paper assesses the similarities and differences regarding conflict resolution and responses to massive human rights violations. The first section reviews the current debate over the UN principle of “Responsibility to Protect” (R2P), notably in relation to the Brazilian concept of “Responsibility while Protecting” (RwP). It looks at the perceptions of Atlantic countries, groups and alliances on issues of national sovereignty, sanctions and military interventions authorized by the UN Security Council (UNSC). The second section focuses on the initiatives and positions of Atlantic countries and regional organizations and their alignments at the UN Security Council, the UN General Assembly, and the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). The section concentrates on their voting patterns concerning four cases in particular: two outside the Atlantic space (Syria and Iran) and two inside (Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire). These four countries have been selected because they represent different types of conflicts: Iran and Syria are international hotspots and suppose, albeit for very different reasons, potential threats for regional peace and global stability; Haiti and Côte d’Ivoire rank high on the list of fragile states and the international community has been highly engaged in crisis management and stabilization in these countries.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Governing Council of the United Nations Environment
    UNITED NATIONS EP UNEP/GCSS.IX/11 Distr.: General Governing Council 16 March 2006 of the United Nations Environment Programme Original: English Ninth special session of the Governing Council/ Global Ministerial Environment Forum Dubai, 7–9 February 2006 Proceedings of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum at its ninth special session Introduction The ninth special session of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held at the Dubai International Convention Centre in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from 7 to 9 February 2006. It was convened in pursuance of paragraph 1 (g) of Governing Council decision 20/17 of 5 February 1999, entitled “Views of the Governing Council on the report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; Governing Council decision 23/12 of 7 April 2005, entitled “Provisional agendas, dates and venues of the ninth special session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum and the twenty-fourth session of the Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum”, paragraph 6 of General Assembly resolution 53/242 of 28 July 1999, entitled “Report of the Secretary-General on environment and human settlements”; and paragraph 5 of General Assembly resolution 40/243 of 18 December 1985, entitled “Pattern of conferences”; and in accordance with rules 5 and 6 of the rules of procedure of the Governing Council. I. Opening of the session A. Ceremonial opening 1. The ceremonial opening of the ninth special session of the UNEP Governing Council/Global Ministerial Environment Forum was held on Monday, 6 February 2006, in conjunction with the award ceremony for the third Zayed International Prize for the Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Asean Charter
    THE ASEAN CHARTER THE ASEAN CHARTER Association of Southeast Asian Nations The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was established on 8 August 1967. The Member States of the Association are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Viet Nam. The ASEAN Secretariat is based in Jakarta, Indonesia. =or inquiries, contact: Public Affairs Office The ASEAN Secretariat 70A Jalan Sisingamangaraja Jakarta 12110 Indonesia Phone : (62 21) 724-3372, 726-2991 =ax : (62 21) 739-8234, 724-3504 E-mail: [email protected] General information on ASEAN appears on-line at the ASEAN Website: www.asean.org Catalogue-in-Publication Data The ASEAN Charter Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, January 2008 ii, 54p, 10.5 x 15 cm. 341.3759 1. ASEAN - Organisation 2. ASEAN - Treaties - Charter ISBN 978-979-3496-62-7 =irst published: December 2007 1st Reprint: January 2008 Printed in Indonesia The text of this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted with proper acknowledgment. Copyright ASEAN Secretariat 2008 All rights reserved CHARTER O THE ASSOCIATION O SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PREAMBLE WE, THE PEOPLES of the Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), as represented by the Heads of State or Government of Brunei Darussalam, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao Peoples Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Union of Myanmar, the Republic of the Philippines, the Republic of Singapore, the Kingdom of Thailand and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam: NOTING
    [Show full text]
  • Asian Ftas: Trends and Challenges
    ADBI Working Paper Series Asian FTAs: Trends and Challenges Masahiro Kawai and Ganeshan Wignaraja No. 144 August 2009 Asian Development Bank Institute Masahiro Kawai is dean of the Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) in Tokyo. Ganeshan Wignaraja is a principal economist in the Office of Regional and Economic Integration at the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in Manila. This paper was prepared as a chapter for a forthcoming book, Asian Regionalism in the World Economy: Engine for Dynamism and Stability, edited by Masahiro Kawai, Jong-Wha Lee, and Peter A. Petri. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. Suggested citation: Kawai, M., and G. Wignaraja. 2009. Asian FTAs: Trends and Challenges. ADBI Working Paper 144. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: http://www.adbi.org/working-paper/2009/08/04/3256.asian.fta.trends.challenges/ Asian Development Bank Institute Kasumigaseki Building 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 100-6008, Japan Tel: +81-3-3593-5500 Fax: +81-3-3593-5571 URL: www.adbi.org E-mail: [email protected] © 2009 Asian Development Bank Institute ADBI Working Paper 144 Kawai and Wignaraja Abstract Although a latecomer, economically important Asia has emerged at the forefront of global free trade agreement (FTA) activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Free Trade Agreements in East Asia
    Prospects for Free Trade Agreements in East Asia January 2003 Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO) Copyright © JETRO 2003 All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by mimeograph, photocopy, or any other means, nor stored in any information retrieval system, without the express written permission of the publishers. (For Distribution in the U.S.) This material is distributed by the U.S. offices of JETRO (Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, New York, and San Francisco) on behalf of the Japan External Trade Organization (JETRO), Tokyo, Japan. Additional information is available at the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Introduction Since the start of the 1990s moves toward economic integration have progressed rapidly around the world, particularly in the form of free trade agreements. Within Asia, the ASEAN Free Trade Area was initiated by the members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in 1993 and has since reached its final formative stage, and in January 2002 Japan entered into its first bilateral free trade agreement, the Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement, which went into effect in November 2002. In November 2002 ASEAN and China concluded an agreement concerning comprehensive economic cooperation, including a commitment to work toward establishing an FTA. In addition, Japan and ASEAN have agreed to aim for the creation of JACEP, a Japan-ASEAN Closer Economic Partnership, as soon as possible within the next 10 years; government-level negotiations toward this end are to start in 2003. Meanwhile, countries including Australia, Singapore, and Thailand are actively seeking to conclude new bilateral FTAs.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 at the 34'^^ ASEAN Summit Earlier This Year, Our Leaders Reiterated
    STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS BY AMBASSADOR BURHAN GAFOOR, PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE TO THE UNITED NATIONS, AT THE THEMATIC DEBATE ON CLUSTER FIVE: OTHER DISARMAMENT MEASURES AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, FIRST COMMITTEE, 29 OCTOBER 2019 Thank you, Mr Chairman. 1 I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the Member States of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(ASEAN). Our statement will focus on cybersecurity, on which I will make three points. 2 First, ASEAN's vision is for a peaceful, secure, and resilient cyberspace, which serves as an enabler of economic progress, enhanced regional connectivity and the betterment of living standards for all. Digital transformation will have tremendous benefits and opportunities for our region. At the same time, we are cognisant that pervasive, ever-evolving, and transboundary cyber threats have the potential to undemiine international peace and security. To this end, ASEAN believes that cybersecurity requires coordinated expertise from multiple stakeholders from across different domains, to effectively mitigate threats, build trust, and realise the benefits of technology. 3 Second, no govemment can deal with the growing sophistication and transboundary nature of cyber threats alone. Regional collaboration is imperative, and ASEAN has taken concrete and practical steps to this end. 4 At the 34'^^ ASEAN Summit earlier this year, our Leaders reiterated ASEAN's commitment to enhancing cybersecurity cooperation, and the building of an open, secure, stable, accessible, and resilient cyberspace supporting the digital economy of the ASEAN region. At the 3^^^ ASEAN Ministerial Conference on Cybersecurity(AMCC) in September 2018, ASEAN became the first and only regional group to subscribe to the 11 voluntaiy, non-binding norms recommended in the 2015 report of the UN Group of Governmental Experts on Developments in the Field of Information and Telecommunications in the Context of International Security (UNGGE).
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on Preferential Market Access for Asean Least Developed Countries
    UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK ON PREFERENTIAL MARKET ACCESS FOR ASEAN LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES Part III: ASEAN-FTA Agreements Layout and Printing at United Nations, Geneva – 2017833 (E) – March 2021 – 730 – UNCTAD/ALDC/2019/5 “Mazzarello - geometrie del dare, nuovo futuro” is the work of Maurizio Cancelli. Its architectural perspective emphasizes the interactions of governments, societies and economies from around the globe under the United Nations Framework. This collaboration highlights the earth, its resources and potentials, and fosters a recognition of local communities and their right to exist in their places of origin, with their own distinction and diversity. Maurizio Cancelli started his artistic research on the right to live in one’s place of birth more than thirty years ago. His work is inspired by the mountainous terrain surrounding the village of Cancelli in the heart of Umbria, Italy. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK ON PREFERENTIAL MARKET ACCESS FOR ASEAN LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES Part III: ASEAN-FTA Agreements Geneva, 2021 © 2021, United Nations This work is available through open access, by complying with the Creative Commons licence created for intergovernmental organizations, at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations or its officials or Member States. The designations employed and the presentation of material on any map in this work do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Struggle of Becoming the 11Th Member State of ASEAN: Timor Leste‘S Case
    The Struggle of Becoming the 11th Member State of ASEAN: Timor Leste‘s Case Rr. Mutiara Windraskinasih, Arie Afriansyah 1 1 Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia E-mail : [email protected] Submitted : 2018-02-01 | Accepted : 2018-04-17 Abstract: In March 4, 2011, Timor Leste applied for membership in ASEAN through formal application conveying said intent. This is an intriguing case, as Timor Leste, is a Southeast Asian country that applied for ASEAN Membership after the shift of ASEAN to acknowledge ASEAN Charter as its constituent instrument. Therefore, this research paper aims to provide a descriptive overview upon the requisites of becoming ASEAN Member State under the prevailing regulations. The substantive requirements of Timor Leste to become the eleventh ASEAN Member State are also surveyed in the hopes that it will provide a comprehensive understanding as why Timor Leste has not been accepted into ASEAN. Through this, it is to be noted how the membership system in ASEAN will develop its own existence as a regional organization. This research begins with a brief introduction about ASEAN‘s rules on membership admission followed by the practice of ASEAN with regard to membership admission and then a discussion about the effort of Timor Leste to become one of ASEAN member states. Keywords: membership, ASEAN charter, timor leste, law of international and regional organization I. INTRODUCTION South East Asia countries outside the The 1967 Bangkok Conference founding father states to join ASEAN who produced the Declaration of Bangkok, which wish to bind to the aims, principles and led to the establishment of ASEAN in August purposes of ASEAN.
    [Show full text]
  • ASEAN's Pattaya Problem by Donald K Emmerson
    ASEAN's Pattaya problem By Donald K Emmerson The turmoil in Thailand is about domestic questions: who shall rule the kingdom, and what is the future of democracy there? But the crisis also raises questions for the larger region: who will lead the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and what is the future of democracy in Southeast Asia? In mid-2008, Thailand began its tenure as ASEAN's chair. The chair is expected, at a minimum, to host successfully the association's main events, most notably the ASEAN summit and multiple other summits between Southeast Asia's leaders and those of other countries. Accordingly, Thailand had planned to welcome the heads of ASEAN's other nine member government plus their counterparts from Australia, China, India, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea in a series of meetings in the Thai resort town of Pattaya on April 10-12. (The other nine are Singapore, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, Myanmar, Laos, Brunei, Cambodia and Indonesia.) Summitry called for decorum - serene images of Thai leaders greeting their distinguished guests. Bedlam came closer to describing the scene in Pattaya when Thai protesters opposed to the new government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva stormed the summit's venue and forced its cancellation. Heads of state and government who had already arrived at the seaside resort 150 kilometers southeast of Bangkok were evacuated by helicopter. Planes carrying other leaders to Thailand were turned back in mid-flight. No one blames ASEAN for Thailand's political travails. Because of it, however, the regional organization has lost major face.
    [Show full text]