Princess Ashraf PAHLAVI Iran
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
-131- EjCN.4jSR.1C82 SUMMARY RECORD OF THE ONE THOUSAND AND EIGHTY-SECOND MEE.TING Held on Monday, 23 March 1970, at 3.30 p.m. Chairman: Princess Ashraf PAHLAVI Iran ., / ... E/ CN . J.~/SR.I082 -132- Qm:STION OF HUMAN BIGHTS IN THE TERRITORIES OCClJPIED AS A liT~S'JLT OF HOSTILITIES n:r THE MIDDLE FAST, INCLUDnm THE REPORT OF THE SPECIAL WOPJGNG GROUP OF EXPERTS (COMMISSION RJ~SOLUTION 6 (xxv)) (agenda item 5) (E/CN.Lf/1016 and Add.1-5; ~/CN. 4/L .1l~2) (concluded) Mr. BEJASA (Philippines) expressed the c;oncern of his Government for the civilian population which had been caught up in tde hostilities in the Middle East. Although he realized that the issue had c8mplex political implications, he was disappointed that the delegations had emphasized the political aspects. He helped trot wisdom would prevail and an equitable settlement would be reached on the basis of Security Council resellution 242 (1967). The report of the Special Working Group of Experts (E/CN.4/10l6 and Add.1-5) contained several judicious and constructive reconwendations, The Group was to be commended for having fuJ£illed its mission under such difficult circumstances. It was important, in considering its report, to remember that its mandate was limited to the investigation of allegations concerning Israel's violations of the Geneva Convention of August 1949 reJative to the Protection of Civilian Person8 in Time of War. Furthermore, the Group had explicitly stated that the evidence it had uncovered was one ··sided and that it "Has not in a position to verify juridically the allegations which it had received. His delegation felt that it was not possible to dra"l-} any firm conclusions 01' fact ::m the basis of the allegations he:Cl rd by the Special Horking· Group and shared its reluctance to express an unequivocal judgement. Pending a political settlement of the problem, the very constructive recommendations made by the Special "Harking Group offered the only reaJ. hape for relief of the civilian population in the occupied territories. Mr.~"}illAlAF (United A.rab Hepublic) said that it "I'I1;1,S reassuring to note that many of the delegatIons, even th~)se which had expressed reservations, had felt compassj.on for the plight of the civilian population in the Middle East. Some delegations had said that it was necessary to separate the political aspect from. the human rights aspect of the problem. He hoped that would be the philosophy of the Commission vlith regard to all the items on its agenda, The representative of the Philippines had said that the Special Worldng Group CQulc1 not prove the allegations it had heard because the evidence it had received had been one ··sidecl. He wished to stress the fact tbat neither the Commission n:lr /. , . -133- (111r. Kbala:f. United Arab ReQ!bJ.ic) --' ---- . -- the Special Working Group was to blame for that situation. Israel h8d refused to allow the Group to visit the occupied territories. It was up to Israel to enable the Working Group to hear the other side of the story. The representative of Israel had not been able to l"ef'ute any of the testimony recorded by the Special Wo!~ing Group. The Group had not only heard witnesses but had seen the evidence which they had adduced and had been able to reach definite conclusions on certain matters, such as the allegations concerning the destruction of entire villages and the deportation of thousands of people. !i'urthermore, the report of the Special Worldng Group "Was not the only source of in1 ormation regarding the violation of' hUll.,JD rights in the occupied territories. There were other reports and testimony, inclUding the reports of UNRWA, the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Amnesty International, the :i.mpartiality of which was beyond question. There were also the statements of the Israeli leaders themselves, such as General rayan and Yigal Allan, regarding the new settlements that ","ere being established and the deportation of 300,000 refugees from the Gaza Strip. The CHAIRIVfAN informed the Commission that Mr. Barton, Observer for the World Federation of Trade Unions, had requested permission to address the COl:1l11ission. If she heard n'.J objections) she vlould grant his request. It was so agreed. At the Chairman! s invitati~ lz Mr. Barton, Obsel'ver for the World Federation of Trade Unions, tool\: a 121ace at_ the Commission table. Mr. BARTON (v!orld Ii'ederation of' 'rrade Unions) said that in view of the implication which some members might r':_nd in the statement made at the previous meeting by the observer of a non-governmental organization, he felt compelled to emphasize that the point of viE:.w expressed did not represent the position of all non-governmental organizations. 1'he VTorld Federation of Trade Unions had condemned the violation of the human rights of the population in the territories occupied by Israel. At the I· .. E/CN .4/SR .1082 -134- (Mr. Barton, WFTU) Seventh World Trade Union Congress held in Budapest in Octoberl969 a resolution had been adopted stating, inter alia, that in expressing the will of a very broad section of the working class and the workers ~f the warld, the Congress resolutelY condemned the aggressive policy of Israel, backed by the forces of imperialism and world Zionism, demanded that th~ Israeli army should be immediately halted, that the consequences of the aggression should be eliminated, and that all the troops of occupation should be completedly and unconditionally withdrawn from the occupie Arab territories. The WFTU Executive Bureau, meeting in Khartoum in February, had adopted a resolution affirming the solidarity of WFTU with the Arab peoples. At a meeting held on l March 1970 between delegations of WFTU and the International Confederation of Arab Trade Unions, the two organizations had agreed to create an international trade union committee of solidarity with the Palestinian workers and people and to publish jointly a Wpite Book containing the reports of a Commission of Inquiry concerning the fate of the Arab population and workers and of the Palestinian refugees. WFTU considered that the violations of human rights and of the Geneva Convention by the Israeli Government in the occupied territories arose from the nature of the aggression committed by Israel and the illegal methods used in its attempt to force the populati~n to collaborate with the occupying Power. The report of the Special Working Group of Experts provided considerable evidence of the violation of human rights and of the Geneva Convention in the territories occupied by Israel and \~TU hoped that the Commission would adopt the resolution submitted to it on the basis of the report. For its part, WFTU, was resolved to strengthen its efforts to uphold the rights of the Palestinian and other Arab workers and peoples. Mr. SCHREIBER (Director, Division of Human Rights) said it was difficul1 at the present~age, to estimate the financial implications of the draft resolutic contained in document EjCN.4/L.ll42. A certain number of elements were still missing. The Secretariat had contacted the members of the Special Working Group with regard to its plans for carrying out its functions in the Middle East, in addition to its functions in South Africa, but the Working Group had not yet been j . .. -135- E/CN.4/sR .1002 (Mr. Schreiber; Director; Division of Human Rights) able to meet and discuss appropriate arrangements. Furthermore; certain information which had to be obtained from Geneva had not yet reached the Secretariat. The Under-Secretar,y-General for Conference Services had informed him that the Secretariat would n~t be in a position to provide the necessary services for the transcription, translation and reproduction of testimony during the session of the General Assembly. For the time being) he could only provide a rough estimate of the costs which would be involved if the Special Working Group should decide to carry out its investigations in the Middle East in conjunction with its trip to southern Africa. The cost of the trip to the Middle East would be on the order of $108,570 for 1970 and $27;580 for 1971. Those figures were based on the corresponding expenditures for the previous year. The Secretariat hoped that after the members of the Working Group had the opportunity of considering their programme of work under the two resolutions - the one relating to African territories and the one relating to occupied territories - it might be possible to present more specific estimates to the Economic and Social Council when it examined the report of the Commission. Mrs. OULD DADDAH (Mauritania) thanked the representative of the Secretary General for the information regarding the financial implications of the draft resolution. The sponsors wished to make it clear that operative paragraph 9 should be interpreted as expressing a decision of the Commission that the Working Group should conduct its investigations in the occupied territories themselves. That seemed to be the wish of most delegations. The Working Group should hear witnesses from both sides and report to the Commission on the situation inside the occupied territories. The Commission would then be in a better position to assess the objections which had been raised by certain delegations regarding the one-sidedness of the testimonies. Mr. BENHIMA (Morocco) thanked the representative of the SecretarY-General for the information he had provided. However; it was his understanding that the two mandates of the Working Group, regarding South Af~ica and the Middle East) should not be confused. He would prefer to have the financial implications regarding the mission to the Middle East presented separately from those of any other missions the members of the Working Group might undertake.