DOCSLIB.ORG

Eleanor Roosevelt College Research Journal ISSUE 9 WINTER 2019 Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eleanor Roosevelt College Research Journal ISSUE 9 WINTER 2019 Table of Contents Eleanor Roosevelt College Research Journal ISSUE 9 WINTER 2019 Table of Contents Letter from the Editors 1 Chezy, Ela The Early Modern Istanbul Coffeehouse and the Secularization of the Ottoman Empire 2 Lara Sanli Meet Lara Sanli 8 Allison Kifer The Bare Minimum: UC San Diego’s Housing and Food Insecure Population 9 Sara Hwang Meet Sara Hwang 13 Yuchen Wu Miscellaneous: A Collection of Art 14 Caitlin King Meet Caitlin King 15 Samantha Mah A Collection of Art 16 Lucie Samarvoka 19 Meet the Staff Letter from the Editors 1 Circuit has always been a space for celebrating the diverse strengths of our academic ERC com- C munity. With its recent involvement in the cam- H pus-wide “Smells Like Zine Spirit” zine festival, the journal has been making greater progress E in terms of stressing the criticality of creativity to the academic experience. In a world where- Z in we are taught that solutions are guaranteed Y through the method of tradition, the process of approaching problems, inside and outside In this last quarter of the year, we must reflect of the classroom, has become an exercise of a on what has happened in 2018. At Circuit, it’s narrow nature. Our mental faculties often too our goal to gather research--our source of data, readily accept that there is only one solution to analyses, empirical studies, and writings--that one problem, and that there is only one way of is emblematic of such reflections. At the higher tackling one problem. This specifically, is why education scale, however, students’ voices and the innovation of art must be stressed. reflections are often shadowed by that of grad- uate students and faculty. Art teaches us to create. Having license to ex- press the world as one views his or her political, Thus, we work hard in Circuit to create a plat- social, and economic environments, allows us to form for undergraduate research. Our Fall 2018 take a stand against the injustice of seeing the issue is especially vocal about troubles during world and its issues through just one lens. We our time--our cover design, indeed, comes are encouraged by art to think about ourselves, from our first published photo series, which and our world, as well as its issues, creatively. discusses south Asian beauty standards. In becoming a more accessible platform for We must work together to amplify our peers’ artists and creators to share their works, Circuit insights. Yes, graduate and faculty research has become part of a greater movement to ad- holds immense value, but so do ours. Being vocate from the importance of a creative educa- that we are the next generation of profession- tion - and that, is something that I will always be als, it is us who have a say in the information that defines us, and of course ultimately our world. There’s many ways to pull off this ampli- fication--and our style is publishing real under- grads’ (maybe even yours!) papers and getting E to know the intelligent person behind them. L Thank you for taking the time to pick up our A journal, and thank you if you’re reading this. We truly hope you may find intriguing things in here. 2 The Early Modern Istanbul Coffeehouse and the Secularization of the Ottoman Empire by Lara Sanli The coffeehouse is an informal space in which people convene to drink coffee, socialize, and exchange ideas (McKay 2007). While many believe that intellectual coffeehouse culture developed during the eighteenth century European Enlightenment, it actually originated in early modern Istanbul and inspired the Enlightenment thinkers who received recognition for coffeehouse culture (Karababa and Ger 2011). Due to sixteenth century Ottoman trade prosperity, Istanbul became a hub for merchants trading coffee and ideas (Ervin 014).2 This diversity, cultural exchange, and fusion of ideas brought about by trade allowed Istanbul to develop as an ideal place for coffeehouses. Within these coffeehouses, class hierarchies dissolved as the rich and poor interacted with each other (McKay 2007). Educated men shared their knowledge with poorer men, and new ideas—many of which threatened the security of the government—began to spread (McKay 2007). Additionally, the coffeehouse developed as a public space completely separate from the mosque (Ervin 2014). It was not affiliated with Islam at all, and it thus contributed to the spread of non-religious ideas and behaviors. This is an anomaly because the Ottoman Empire was Muslim and the mosque was the center of religious, social, and governmental life. In this way, the secular coffeehouse conflicted with the religious government. This observation led me to ask the following question: How did the development of the early modern Istanbul coffeehouse shape society within the Ottoman Empire? Although scholars such as Alain Mikhail believe that the early modern Istanbul coffeehouse reinforced preexisting Ottoman values, it actually introduced new values that influenced the secularization and modernization of the Ottoman Empire. This is evidenced by the development of the coffeehouse as a non-religious space, the exchange of new ideas within the coffeehouse, and the multiple resistance efforts against government coffeehouse bans. Scholars such as Alain Mikhail claim that the coffeehouse actually reinforced Ottoman traditions and did not change culture or politics. For example, Mikhail believes that coffeehouses “offered their male clientele a substitute for a selamlik, the name given to the section of the house reserved for men of the family to greet and socialize with their guests” (Mikhail 2014). Within the private sphere of the Ottoman household, men and women were traditionally separated into two 3 different spaces. As the portion of the household uniquely reserved for men, the selamlik embodied Ottoman traditionalism by reinforcing these separate spheres according to gender distinctions. The layout of Ottoman houses, therefore, excluded women from participating in the worldly activities of men. The selamlik embodied this gender hierarchy, a hierarchy which was similarly repeated in the construction of the Ottoman coffeehouse. The coffeehouse was also a gendered space, and Mikhail argues that the men-only structure of these new coffeehouses was too similar to the structure of domestic sphere to be considered unorthodox. For example, women were excluded from the coffeehouse. They were barred from any attempts at the intellectual discussion that went on in the coffeehouse, but occasionally allowed to enter the space only for the purpose of entertainment and appearing as exotic dancers (Mikhail 2014). Mikhail argues that the lack of women in this space mirrored the traditional separation of men and women in the Ottoman household. Therefore, according to Mikhail, the coffeehouse did not radically change the structure of Ottoman societal life. Instead of creating a revolutionary public sphere separate from the domestic sphere, the coffeehouse simply recreated the selamlik, or the male domestic sphere, in a different space. While Mikhail’s argument is plausible, it has several weaknesses. Even though women were excluded from the coffeehouse just as they were excluded from the selamlik, coffeehouses actually achieved substantial social progress in the area of class relationships. For this reason, the dissolution of class relationships was more significant than Mikhail’s observation about the unchangeability of Ottoman gender relations. Coffeehouses were not exclusive, as Mikhail argues, but they were actually socially inclusive. Whereas men typically invited other men of the same class into their private selamliks, the coffeehouse was a place for men of all social classes. People transcended class borders as they interacted with new and diverse people, and this fusion of different backgrounds deviated from traditional Ottoman attitudes frowning upon inter- class interactions. Indeed, the coffeehouse was not a private space— it was a public one: “It is certain that the first coffeehouses were public centers open to the all segments of society. In a short period of time, coffee as a substance and the coffeehouse as an institution acquired a recognition among the city inhabitants from different social strata in Istanbul” (Yasar 2003). General openness of the coffeehouse to men of all social levels led to different classes interacting with each other. The dissolution of class distinctions initiated the beginnings of a boundless society, which is relevant because class distinctions were a traditional component of the structure of Ottoman society. This introduction of new social values contributed to the secularization of the 4 Ottoman Empire by making people more willing to interact with others and share diverse ideas. The coffeehouse further contributed to the secularization of the Ottoman Empire by emerging as a non-religious space separate from the religious government. This is notable because the mosque had previously been at the center of traditional Ottoman society. As a result, it “[was] plagued by social obligations” everyone was expected to follow (Ervin 2014). Within the mosque, men were expected to conduct themselves with discipline and in accordance with traditional religious principles. For example, they were expected to follow formulaic prayer recitations, be present in silence, and dress in a particular way before God (Ervin 2014). Life revolved around the mosque, and religious values permeated into the social sphere so that all personal conduct was held to these religious standards. However, the religious nature of Ottoman society was gradually replaced with a more secular one as the coffeehouse developed as a space separate from the mosque. Free from the constraints of the mosque’s guidelines, men were free to engage in non-religious activities typically frowned upon by the mosque: “Within the coffeehouse strict rules were less applicable and many classes were able to freely gather and exchange ideas” (Ervin 2014). Their interactions were largely intellectual and relating to the exchange of ideas, many of which were controversial for challenging religious doctrine and the traditional religious authority of the government.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Generating a New Image for Cultural Heritage: Model for Preserving the Typical Image of the Traditional Turkish Coffeehouse
    Sustainability Today 401 Generating a new image for cultural heritage: model for preserving the typical image of the traditional Turkish coffeehouse N. Ayalp & A. Müge Bozday TOBB University, Turkey Abstract The aim of the study is to create a model for a reusing a specific cultural setting. Traditional Turkish coffeehouses are selected as a traditional environment. The coffeehouse, which has been used in Turkey since the sixteenth century, is one of the most significant places in the country’s cultural heritage. Coffeehouses are one of the public spaces that represent the place identity of Turkish culture. During the Ottoman period, with their frequent use, people helped these places gain place identities. Moreover, not just the space but the ways in which people become socialized represent an intangible part of our cultural heritage. However, previous studies indicate that this cultural value has not been sufficiently transferred to the present day. This study identifies the traditional Turkish coffeehouse as contributing to both tangible and intangible cultural heritage and generates a model for interpreting the coffeehouse in terms of a contemporary place identity. In order to do this, the concept of place, place identity, and social identity is discussed. Turkish coffeehouses are analyzed to identify and their typical spatial elements. In the conclusion, a model for preserving the typical image of the traditional Turkish coffeehouse is presented. Keywords: traditional Turkish coffeehouses, place, place identity, social identity, typical elements in Turkish coffeehouses’ interiors. 1 Introduction: discussion of Turkish coffeehouses within a conceptual framework In order to safeguard a place that has a cultural value, it is not sufficient to discuss just its material attributes.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIABILITY in STARBUCKS COFFEE HOUSES of ISTANBUL the CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC SPACE and ITS USES by Aylin Akyar
    SOCIABILITY IN STARBUCKS COFFEE HOUSES OF ISTANBUL THE CONTEMPORARY PUBLIC SPACE AND ITS USES By Aylin Akyar Submitted to Central European University Department of Gender Studies In partial fulfilment for the degree of Master of Arts in Gender Studies Supervisor: Assistant Professor Hadley Zaun Renkin CEU eTD Collection Budapest, Hungary 2012 i Copyright Notice “Copyright in the text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies by any process, either in full or part, may be made only in accordance with the instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European Library. Details may be obtained from the librarian. This page must form a part of any such copies made. Further copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the written permission of the Author.” CEU eTD Collection ii ABSTRACT By Aylin Akyar Sociability in Starbucks Coffee Houses of Istanbul: The Contemporary Public Space and Its Uses This thesis presents an analytical overview of the economic, social and cultural effects of globalization on Istanbul’s urban social scene, including women’s mobility in the public accelerated with the emergence of new, ‘global’, ‘modern’ public spaces, from the perspective of the Starbucks cafe public in a variety of central districts in Istanbul. Primarily, the thesis builds a historical analysis of the Ottoman coffee houses and their significant place in the Ottoman Istanbul’s public life; and it studies the coffee house as a highly popular public space, from the Habermasian and Sennettian perspectives regarding its functions and desirable functions in the society. Habermas’ public sphere model of the eighteenth century, essentially its exclusion of women, and the quintessentially male character of the urban flaneur of the nineteenth century are discussed and linked to the contemporary public condition in Istanbul.
    [Show full text]
  • Bozahouses, Coffeehouses and Taverns in the Light of the 16 and 17 Century Court Records of Istanbul
    WHERE PEOPLE MET: BOZAHOUSES, COFFEEHOUSES AND TAVERNS IN THE LIGHT OF THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY COURT RECORDS OF ISTANBUL by Sultan Toprak Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University August 2014 WHERE PEOPLE MET: BOZAHOUSES, COFFEEHOUSES AND TAVERNS IN THE LIGHT OF THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY COURT RECORDS OF ISTANBUL Approved by: Tülay Artan …………………………………… (Thesis Supervisor) Yusuf Hakan Erdem …………………………………… Hülya Adak …………………………………… Date of Approval: 05/08/2014 © Sultan Toprak 2014 All Rights Reserved Abstract WHERE PEOPLE MET: BOZAHOUSES, COFFEEHOUSES AND TAVERNS IN THE LIGHT OF THE 16TH AND 17TH CENTURY COURT RECORDS OF ISTANBUL Sultan Toprak History, MA Thesis, 2014 Thesis Supervisor: Tülay Artan Keywords: bozahouse, coffeehouse, tavern, intercommunal relations, court registers, Istanbul This study is an exercise in discussing intercommunal relations through certain public venues –bozahouses, coffeehouses and taverns- in Istanbul by looking at 16th and 17th century sharia/kadı court registers (sicils). Since these businesses were both work and meeting places for people from various backgrounds, they are supposed to contribute to the intercommunal relations. In order to explore this issue, I used the court records as main primary sources as they offer a variety of information about the sale, exchange and disposal of these commercial enterprises as well as the social environment in which they were operated. Besides, most of the secondary sources discuss these businesses by focusing on certain patterns such as historical formation and political control which can be gleaned from a variety of primary sources, but their public character has not been analyzed in consideration of intercommunal relations through the court records.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish Cultural Heritage: a Cup of Coffee
    Accepted Manuscript Turkish cultural heritage: A cup of coffee Birsen Yılmaz, Nilüfer Acar-Tek, Saniye Sözlü PII: S2352-6181(17)30184-1 DOI: 10.1016/j.jef.2017.11.003 Reference: JEF 136 To appear in: Journal of Ethnic Foods Received Date: 13 October 2017 Revised Date: 7 November 2017 Accepted Date: 8 November 2017 Please cite this article as: Yılmaz B, Acar-Tek N, Sözlü S, Turkish cultural heritage: A cup of coffee, Journal of Ethnic Foods (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jef.2017.11.003. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Turkish cultural heritage: A cup of coffee Running Title: Turkish coffee and its culture Birsen Yılmaz 1*, Nilüfer Acar-Tek 2, Saniye Sözlü 3 1Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ankara/Turkey, Tel: +90 312 2162968, Fax: +90 312 2162636, E-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4866-2818 Link: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4866-2818 2Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ankara/Turkey, Tel: +90 312 2162603, Fax: +90 312 2162636, E-mail: [email protected] 3Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences,MANUSCRIPT Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Ankara/Turkey, Tel: +90 312 2162968, Fax: +90 312 2162636, E-mail: [email protected] Word count: 4481 ACCEPTED ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT Turkish cultural heritage: A cup of coffee Abstract Setting out a fabulous journey from a tiny bean, coffee is the stimulant of heart and mind and a mysterious plant which stiffens friendship and takes your tiredness away during the day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palace and the Coffeehouse: the Power of Place in Ottoman History
    The Palace and the Coffeehouse: The Power of Place in Ottoman History, 1300-1800 A Part II Special Subject Dr Helen Pfeifer 2020-2021 The Topkapi Palace in Istanbul was the seat of the Ottoman sultan and the centre of one of the largest and most powerful empires in early modern Eurasia. The coffeehouse, a sixteenth-century Ottoman invention, was the seat of the urban classes and the centre of city life from Belgrade to Baghdad. Different as these two institutions were in their character and clientele, they were neck and neck when it came to their influence on Ottoman politics, society, and culture. This paper examines the power of place in Ottoman history from 1300-1800. Each week introduces students to a new space and to the opportunities or challenges it presented. Many of these spaces will lead us to consider the nature of imperial rule, from the contested frontier zone from which the Ottoman polity emerged; to the capital city that buttressed its imperial claims; to the seas and deserts that continually tested its sovereignty. Other spaces will allow us to consider key social and cultural issues, including the visibility of women, the acceptability of homosexual relations, and the experiences of minority groups like Christians and Jews. Throughout, students will be 1 asked to reflect on the ways in which physical space was not just a neutral backdrop to historical events, but helped shape the possibilities of historical actors and the relations between them. The Michaelmas term is organized chronologically. After an introductory class devoted to the so-called ‘spatial turn’, the remaining seven sessions will examine key spaces in which political and social relations were negotiated as the empire evolved from a minor frontier polity into a world power.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Contact Information
    Alan Mikhail 2019 Yale University T: (203) 432-1353 Department of History F: (203) 432-7587 PO Box 208324 [email protected] New Haven, CT 06520-8324 www.alanmikhail.org ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2013 to Present Professor, Department of History, Yale University 2018 to Present Chair, Department of History, Yale University 2010 to 2013 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Yale University 2008 to 2010 Andrew W. Mellon Fellowship of Scholars in the Humanities Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of History, Stanford University EDUCATION 2008 PhD, History, University of California, Berkeley The Nature of Ottoman Egypt: Irrigation, Environment, and Bureaucracy in the Long Eighteenth Century Winner, 2009 Malcolm H. Kerr Dissertation Award in the Social Sciences, Middle East Studies Association Winner, 2008 James H. Kettner Dissertation Award, University of California, Berkeley 2003 MA, History, University of California, Berkeley 2001 BA, History and Chemistry, Rice University PUBLICATIONS Books God’s Shadow: The Untold Story of Sultan Selim, His Ottoman Empire, and the Making of the Modern World. New York: Liveright/W. W. Norton, August 2020. Contracted Editions and Translations: UK (Faber and Faber), Chinese (CITIC), Dutch (Athenaeum-Polak & Van Gennep), Turkish (Epsilon) 1 Alan Mikhail Yale University Under Osman’s Tree: The Ottoman Empire, Egypt, and Environmental History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. Winner, 2018 M. Fuat Köprülü Book Prize, Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association Winner, 2017 Choice Outstanding Academic Title Award Reviewed in American Historical Review; Choice; Metascience; Environmental History; English Historical Review; Journal for the Study of Religion, Nature and Culture; Paysage Topscape; Nazariyat: Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences; International Journal of Turkish Studies University of Chicago Press Paperback, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Coffee and the Ottoman Social Sphere
    Student Research and Creative Works History Theses University of Puget Sound Year 2014 Coffee and the Ottoman Social Sphere Marita Ervin [email protected] This paper is posted at Sound Ideas. http://soundideas.pugetsound.edu/history theses/10 Coffee and the Ottoman Social Sphere Marita Ervin Index Introduction 3 The Mythology and Origins of Coffee 6 Coffee in the Commercial Sphere 8 The Properties of Coffee 13 The Appeal of Coffee 16 Coffee and the Public Sphere 19 Distinguishing the Coffeehouse from the Tavern 21 The Coffeehouse and the Mosque 24 Inside the Coffeehouse: The Coffeehouse as a Social Sphere 26 Conclusion 33 Bibliography 37 Appendix 41 2 | P a g e Introduction Sharing a cup of coffee has become nearly synonymous with the exchange of information. Coffee has the ability to act as a social unifier and a catalyst for intellectual interaction. Recent decades have experienced a dramatic increase in coffee culture which has resulted in a revival of the social café atmosphere. This revitalization has taken hold in numerous cultures that have transformed the beverage by adopting new processes of brewing and new tools for serving. Within this transformation coffee’s connection with the exchange of social conventions has remained a constant. The integration of social ease and scholarly thought began within the confines of coffeehouses in the Ottoman Empire. A significant amount of historical research has been devoted to European coffeehouses which were adopted from the Ottomans. Within this research Ottoman coffeehouses and their development of safe, social spaces have been largely ignored. The complex cultural exchange between the Ottomans and the Europeans was complicated by European ignorance rooted in the Ottoman acquisition of Constantinople.
    [Show full text]
  • France in the Levant: Trade and Immaterial Circulations in the “Long Eighteenth Century”
    Journal of early modern history 24 (2020) 383-406 brill.com/jemh France in the Levant: Trade and Immaterial Circulations in the “Long Eighteenth Century” David Celetti University of Padova, Italy [email protected] Abstract The article analyzes aspects of French trade in the Levant during the eighteenth century by tracing the link between commercial exchange, institutions, and socio- cultural interaction within the system of French échelles in the Eastern Mediterranean. As the paper argues, this trade not only acquired a primary relevance within Ottoman and French economies but also created institutional and social interdependencies that prefigured nineteenth-century developments. The study discusses how economic, institutional, and social aspects are highly intertwined, each of them playing a core role in explaining the relevance of the French presence in the Early Modern Eastern Mediterranean. Keywords Early Modern Levant – France – Ottoman Empire – Mediterranean trade – diplomacy – economic development – economic dependency Introduction In 1754, Claude-Joseph Vernet completed his painting Intérieur du Port de Marseille vu du Pavillon de l’Horloge du Parc.1 The work offers a fascinating glimpse into French Levant trade as viewed from Marseilles, giving figurative 1 Leon Lagrange, Les Vernets: Antoine, Joseph, Carle, Horace (Paris, 1864), 70-87. See also Nicolas Gaudreau, “La Gloire du peintre et les errements de l’Académie: des pistes pour l’étude des marines De Claude-Joseph Vernet au Salon,” RACAR: Revue D’art Canadienne / Canadian Art © DAVID CELETTI, 2020 | doi:10.1163/15700658-12342662 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NC-NDDownloaded 4.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cultural Exchange in the Post-Medieval Adriatic: an Examination of Glass Artefacts from the 15Th Through Mid-18Th Centuries
    Cross-Cultural Exchange in the Post-Medieval Adriatic: An examination of glass artefacts from the 15th through mid-18th centuries By: Samantha Garwood A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Faculty of Arts and Humanities Department of Archaeology September 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support, guidance, and access to materials provided by friends, family, and colleagues throughout the last four years. Thanks must first be given to my supervisor, Hugh Willmott, for allowing me this amazing research opportunity, and for putting up with my general lack of knowledge. Thanks must also be given to Phil McCluskey, who very kindly continued to support my research even after his time at Sheffield came to an end. Thanks also to the University of Sheffield Faculty of Arts and Humanities for the scholarship which made this possible. Thank you to the many museums who granted me access to their collections: Muzej grada Trogira, especially Lujana Paraman; the Arheološka zbirka Osor – Lošinjski muzej, particularly Jasminka Ćus-Rukonić; Marina Lambasa, Emil Podrug, and the Muzej grada Šibenika; Radmila Biondić and Marina Kovač at the Muzej Slavonije; Igor Mihajlović at the Hrvatski restauratorski zavod; Dr Vesna Bikić at the Institute of Archaeology in Belgrade; and Ðivo Bašić at Pomorski Muzej, Dubrovački Muzeji. Thank you also to Ilir Parangoni for showing me some of the glass finds from Butrint, and to Nikolina Topić, Margherita Ferri, and Luka Bekić for sharing their research with me. Finally, thank you to my family and friends for supporting me through all of this.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Distinction: Imitation and the Anxiety of Jewish, Christian, And
    Muslim Distinction: Imitation and the Anxiety of Jewish, Christian, and Other Influences Youshaa Patel Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Ebrahim Moosa, Supervisor ___________________________ Bruce Lawrence ___________________________ Leela Prasad ___________________________ Carl Ernst Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School at Duke University 2012 ABSTRACT Muslim Distinction: Imitation and the Anxiety of Jewish, Christians, and Other Influences by Youshaa Patel Graduate Program in Religion Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ Ebrahim Moosa, Supervisor ___________________________ Bruce Lawrence ___________________________ Leela Prasad __________________________ Carl Ernst An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate Program in Religion in the Graduate School at Duke University 2012 Copyright by Youshaa Patel 2012 ABSTRACT Contrary to later Muslim tradition, the first Muslims initially looked favorably upon assimilating Jewish and Christian religious and cultural practices. As Muslim collective religious identity conjoined with political power, Muslims changed their religious policy from imitation to distinction; they began to define themselves both above and against their arch­religious rivals. They visibly and publicly materialized their unique brand of monotheism into a distinct religious community. This dissertation is the first attempt to map the Muslim religious discourse that expressed this deliberate turn away from Jews, Christians, and others across pre­modern Islamic history. First, I argue that this discourse functions as a prism through which to view the interplay of religion and politics; a key function of both empire and religion in a pre­modern Muslim context was to uphold hierarchical social distinctions.
    [Show full text]
  • 31-The Analysis of the Importance of Turkish Coffee and Coffeehouses with the Comparison Between British and Ottoman Culture
    392 / RumeliDE Journal of Language and Literature Studies 2020.S8 (November) The analysis of the importance of Turkish coffee and coffeehouses with the comparison between British and Ottoman culture / S. Çapar İleri (pp. 392-397) 31-The analysis of the importance of Turkish coffee and coffeehouses with the comparison between British and Ottoman culture Sinem ÇAPAR İLERİ1 APA: Çapar İleri, S. (2020). The analysis of the importance of Turkish coffee and coffeehouses with the comparison between British and Ottoman culture. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, (Ö8), 392-397. DOI: 10.29000/rumelide.814324. Abstract Coffee is one of the most popular beverages around the world and its social and commercial value is high and widespread. Drinking coffee becomes some kind of a ritual and a favorite pastime activity for many societies. The word “coffee” is originated from the Arabic word qahwa, which later became kahve in Turkish language, and entered European languages after coffee is introduced to Europe from the Ottoman Empire. In the Ottoman Empire, especially in the 16th century, for the first time, Turkish people confronted with the coffee After that time, “Turkish coffee” began to be considered as a special kind of coffee due to the differences both in preparation and presentation. Considering the presentation, roasted coffee beans are boiled in a special pot named cezve in Turkish, usually with sugar, and served in a cup named fincan which is generally similar to an Italian espresso cup in size. In Britain, first coffeehouse was opened by Pasqua Rosée in St. Michael’s Alley, Cornhill, London whose real name was Paşa Rıza.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan-Mikhail-CV-2017.Pdf
    Alan Mikhail 2017 Yale University T: (203) 432-1353 Department of History F: (203) 432-7587 PO Box 208324 [email protected] New Haven, CT 06520-8324 www.alanmikhail.org ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2013 to Present Professor, Department of History, Yale University 2010 to 2013 Assistant Professor, Department of History, Yale University 2008 to 2010 Andrew W. Mellon Fellowship of Scholars in the Humanities Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of History, Stanford University EDUCATION 2008 PhD, History, University of California, Berkeley The Nature of Ottoman Egypt: Irrigation, Environment, and Bureaucracy in the Long Eighteenth Century Winner, 2009 Malcolm H. Kerr Dissertation Award in the Social Sciences, Middle East Studies Association Winner, 2008 James H. Kettner Dissertation Award, University of California, Berkeley 2003 MA, History, University of California, Berkeley 2001 BA, History and Chemistry, Rice University PUBLICATIONS Books Under Osman’s Tree: The Ottoman Empire, Egypt, and Environmental History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017. The Animal in Ottoman Egypt. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Winner, 2014 Gustav Ranis International Book Prize, MacMillan Center, Yale University 1 Alan Mikhail Yale University Reviewed in American Historical Review, International Journal of Middle East Studies, Environmental History, Revue des mondes musulmans et de la Méditerranée, Middle East Journal, International Journal of Turkish Studies, Arab Studies Journal Interview with The MacMillan Report Oxford University Press Paperback, 2017. ed., Water on Sand: Environmental Histories of the Middle East and North Africa. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013. Reviewed in American Historical Review, Foreign Affairs, Choice, International Journal of Turkish Studies, Journal of Islamic Studies, Middle East Report, Landscape History, Arab Studies Quarterly, Bustan: The Middle East Book Review, Teaching History, Middle East Media and Book Reviews, El Gouna Magazine Nature and Empire in Ottoman Egypt: An Environmental History.
    [Show full text]