DOCSLIB.ORG

Human Factors Considerations in the Evaluation of Processor-Based Signal and Train RR04/CB101 Control Systems: Human Factors in Railroad Operations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Human Factors Considerations in the Evaluation of Processor-Based Signal and Train RR04/CB101 Control Systems: Human Factors in Railroad Operations U.S. Department of Transportation Human Factors Considerations in the Federal Railroad Evaluation of Processor-Based Signal Administration and Train Control Systems Office of Research and Development Washington, DC 20590 Human Factors in Railroad Operations DOT/FRA/ORD-07/07 This document is available to the Final Report public through the National Technical June 2007 Information Service, Springfield, VA 22 161. This document is also available on the FRA Web site at www.fra.gov. Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Notice The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspects of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Service, Directorate for information Operations and Reports. 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 222202- 4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (LEAVE BLANK) June 2007 September 2003-September 2004 TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Human Factors Considerations in the Evaluation of Processor-Based Signal and Train RR04/CB101 Control Systems: Human Factors in Railroad Operations AUTHOR(S) John Wreathall, Emilie Roth, Dennis Bley, and Jordan Multer 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION U.S. Department of Transportation John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center DOT-VNTSC-FRA-07-05 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration DOT/FRA/ORD-07/07 Research and Innovative Technology Administration 1120 Vermont Avenue, NW Mail Stop 20 Washington, DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. This document is also available on the FRA Web site at www.fra.dot.gov. 13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words) In August 2001, the Federal Railroad Administration issued the notice of proposed rulemaking: Standards for Development and Use of Processor-Based Signal and Train Control Systems (49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236). This proposed rule addresses the design and implementation of processor-based train control systems. Under the proposed rule, a railroad wishing to implement a positive train control (PTC) system in revenue service must develop and submit a product safety plan (PSP) and assess the risk associated with the new system. This report attempts to fill the gap provided by the lack of knowledge about the kinds of human performance challenges and safety risks that will occur with these proposed systems. To fill this gap, the authors identified human factors issues that arose in other industries where similar kinds of technology and human-machine interfaces were used. This literature review, along with an analysis of PTC-preventable accidents, served as the basis for structuring interviews with employees at several railroads that had experience with train control technology containing elements of PTC. The answers to these questions provide the reader with a roadmap of human performance issues to consider in preparing or evaluating a PSP, along with the implications for risk. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Cognitive task analysis, communications, decisionmaking, human factors, human reliability 160 analysis (HRA), positive train control (PTC), probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), railroad 16. PRICE CODE operations 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT OF REPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified Unclassified METRIC/ENGLISH CONVERSION FACTORS ENGLISH TO METRIC METRIC TO ENGLISH LENGTH (APPROXIMATE) LENGTH (APPROXIMATE) 1 inch (in) = 2.5 centimeters (cm) 1 millimeter (mm) = 0.04 inch (in) 1 foot (ft) = 30 centimeters (cm) 1 centimeter (cm) = 0.4 inch (in) 1 yard (yd) = 0.9 meter (m) 1 meter (m) = 3.3 feet (ft) 1 mile (mi) = 1.6 kilometers (km) 1 meter (m) = 1.1 yards (yd) 1 kilometer (km) = 0.6 mile (mi) AREA (APPROXIMATE) AREA (APPROXIMATE) 1 square inch (sq in, in2) = 6.5 square centimeters 1 square centimeter (cm2) = 0.16 square inch (sq in, in2) (cm2) 1 square foot (sq ft, ft2) = 0.09 square meter (m2) 1 square meter (m2) = 1.2 square yards (sq yd, yd2) 1 square yard (sq yd, yd2) = 0.8 square meter (m2) 1 square kilometer (km2) = 0.4 square mile (sq mi, mi2) 1 square mile (sq mi, mi2) = 2.6 square kilometers 10,000 square meters (m2) = 1 hectare (ha) = 2.5 acres (km2) 1 acre = 0.4 hectare (he) = 4,000 square meters (m2) MASS - WEIGHT (APPROXIMATE) MASS - WEIGHT (APPROXIMATE) 1 ounce (oz) = 28 grams (gm) 1 gram (gm) = 0.036 ounce (oz) 1 pound (lb) = 0.45 kilogram (kg) 1 kilogram (kg) = 2.2 pounds (lb) 1 short ton = 2,000 pounds = 0.9 tonne (t) 1 tonne (t) = 1,000 kilograms (kg) (lb) = 1.1 short tons VOLUME (APPROXIMATE) VOLUME (APPROXIMATE) 1 teaspoon (tsp) = 5 milliliters (ml) 1 milliliter (ml) = 0.03 fluid ounce (fl oz) 1 tablespoon (tbsp) = 15 milliliters (ml) 1 liter (l) = 2.1 pints (pt) 1 fluid ounce (fl oz) = 30 milliliters (ml) 1 liter (l) = 1.06 quarts (qt) 1 cup (c) = 0.24 liter (l) 1 liter (l) = 0.26 gallon (gal) 1 pint (pt) = 0.47 liter (l) 1 quart (qt) = 0.96 liter (l) 1 gallon (gal) = 3.8 liters (l) 1 cubic foot (cu ft, ft3) = 0.03 cubic meter (m3) 1 cubic meter (m3) = 36 cubic feet (cu ft, ft3) 1 cubic yard (cu yd, yd3) = 0.76 cubic meter (m3) 1 cubic meter (m3) = 1.3 cubic yards (cu yd, yd3) TEMPERATURE (EXACT) TEMPERATURE (EXACT) [(x-32)(5/9)] °F = y °C [(9/5) y + 32] °C = x °F QUICK INCH - CENTIMETER LENGTH CONVERSION 0 1 2345 Inches Centimeters 0126 3 4 5 711098 1112 3 QUICK FAHRENHEIT - CELSIUS TEMPERATURE CONVERSION °F -40° -22° -4° 14° 32° 50° 68° 86° 104° 122° 140° 158° 176° 194° 212° °C -40° -30° -20° -10° 0° 10° 20° 30° 40° 50° 60° 70° 80° 90° 100° For more exact and or other conversion factors, see NIST Miscellaneous Publication 286, Units of Weights and Measures. Price $2.50 SD Catalog No. C13 10286 Updated 6/17/98 ii PREFACE In August 2001, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) issued the notice of proposed rulemaking: Standards for Development and Use of Processor-Based Signal and Train Control Systems (49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 236). This proposed rule addresses the design and implementation of processor-based train control systems. Under the proposed rule, a railroad wishing to implement a positive train control (PTC) system in revenue service must develop and submit a product safety plan (PSP) and assess the risk associated with the new system. Submitting this information will require knowledge of the human-machine interface (HMI) and its impact on human performance. Similarly, FRA will require knowledge of HMI and its impact on human performance to evaluate the safety of the new system. The first system expected to fall under the proposed rule is the North American Joint Positive Train Control (NAJPTC) system. This PTC system differs significantly from train control systems that have come before it. The NAJPTC system is a complex train control system that will significantly alter the current method of operation. This change in operation will significantly alter the way railroad employees interact with the train control system and may create the potential for a variety of new failure modes. The current report provides guidance to the railroad industry, specifically to those people who must submit human factors analyses of HMI as part of the PSP and to FRA staff, which must evaluate those analyses. The challenge for the railroad is to identify how these new systems or components will affect human performance, identify new failure modes, and address how to prevent or mitigate these failure modes. FRA must decide whether the human factors analysis has identified all the potential human factors-related safety risks and addressed them in a satisfactory way. This report attempts to fill the gap provided by the lack of knowledge about the kinds of human performance challenges and safety risks that will occur with these proposed systems. To fill this gap, this report identifies human factors issues that arose in other industries, such as aviation and nuclear power, where similar kinds of technology and human-machine interfaces were used. This literature review, along with an analysis of PTC-preventable accidents, served as the basis for structuring interviews with employees at several railroads that had experience with train control technology containing elements of PTC. The answers to these questions provide the reader with a roadmap of human performance issues to consider in preparing or evaluating a PSP, along with the implications for risk. As knowledge about these technologies grows and experience using the new HMIs increases, it will become easier to identify potential safety risks and evaluate the solutions for addressing them. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Federal Railroad Administration’s Office of Research and Development funded this research effort.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 2017 Volume 37
    MAY 22, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 5 A Club in Transition 3 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 5 ■■■■■ MAY 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….4 Treasurer………………....Will Baker A Club in Transition….…..13 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ ………..4 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Clinic……………..….…….7 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘17) Form 19 Orders .... ………..4 Members .............. ….…....14 Memories ............. .………..5 Potpourri .............. ..……….7 ON THE COVER: The first 25% of our building was Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016
    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This Document
    Amtra ~ A Newsletter für Amtrak Emplüyees VOlUME 2-ISSUE 4 FEBRUARY 19, 1973 It probably wasn't true, as one Texan said, that the most exeiting thing to hit the Lone Star State in deeades was the inaugural run of Amtrak's Inter Ameriean on January 27th. But the train eer­ tainly did draw erowds all along its route. This group jammed the station plat­ form so tightly at one stop, photographers were forees to climb the train order signal mast to get their pie tu res. (Additional pietures on Pages 4 and 5.) texans welcome amtrak with cheers and crowds A Texas sun glowing with the promise of a benign Commerce officers were on hand to welcome the train January day was rising over Fort Worth as the 164 and its passengers with carefully-worded speeches and passengers began boarding the gleaming, immaculate band music. Five minute stops stretched to 15 minutes train. They were embarki ng on a 474-mile train ride but no o ne seemed to worry. It was an event to be and they were in a holiday mood. For 11 hours, they marked w ith well-rounded phrases and Sousa's best would be rolling south ac ross the vast, mesquite-studded even if it took a few extra minutes. Several times, long, plains of the Lone Star State. For some of the travelers piercing blasts from the engineer were required to get it was going to be one long party. For others, it was the passengers back aboard. One thing nobody wanted going to be a restful, pleasant journey.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Public Transportation Commission Minutes of December 4, 2008
    Connecticut Public Transportation Commission Minutes of December 4, 2008 Fourth Floor Conference Room Union Station, New Haven Attendance: Members: Tom Cheeseman, Mort Katz, Russ St. John, Terry Hall, Rich Sunderhauf, Rick Schreiner, Yvonne Loteczka, Chris Adams, Alan Sylvestre, Bill Kelaher, Richard Carpenter. Ex-officio members: Susan Simmat (OPM), Connie Mendolia (DEP), Fred Riese (DEP). ConnDOT staff: Dennis King. Guests: Leo Petry. Chairman Cheeseman opened the meeting at 1:32 PM. Tom announced that today’s scheduled speaker, Michael Krauss, had phoned Tom earlier this afternoon to say that he would be unable to make today’s meeting. Following this, the minutes of the meeting of November 6 were approved as written. Tom mentioned that all Jobs Access and Reverse Commute transportation providers have been asked to submit 5% recission package cuts. For Tom’s system, Middletown Area Transit, this may force him to cut the return trip on the Night Owl run, which will mean that he can get workers to their jobs but not home. The Night Owl service provides 31,000 – 33,000 trips per year. Tom’s other Jobs Access service, the M Link, which connects Middletown and Meriden, provides 36,000 trips per year. His Jobs Access ridership has been growing at 3% per month. Also, the Department of Social Services may not have their Jobs Access contracts ready by December 31, which means providers will receive no money until after the new year begins. Some providers will need to borrow money to cover this interval. Comments from the Public None. Reports from Operating Entities Rick Schreiner said the impacts to Housatonic Area Regional Transit’s Jobs Access program from the 5% recission are not clear yet.
    [Show full text]
  • RUN Spring 2012V3
    NEWSLETTER Spring 2012 Vol. 9, Issue 2 RUN Conference Attendees Will Monitor Proposed Federal Actions on Rail Individual By Jack Corbett FY2013 DOT Appropriations of the FY2013 year. Getting Highlights Act. Last week the U.S. Senate these measures conferenced for When RUN’s Regional passed a two-year Surface final Congressional approvals Conference convenes in the Transportation Reauthorization by the House and Senate will be Amtrak Accelerates, NS Nation’s Capital next month Act, 74-22, that continues difficult. (Friday, April 20), many mass transit funding at current Puts on Brakes p. 2 Among the transit and rail attendees will have visited the levels, funded from Federal gas issues RUN conferees will offices of their Congressional tax revenues. The Republican have discussed with their G Train Extension p. 3 delegations and Congressional majority in the House of Congressional offices are the transportation leaders the prior Representatives has had a following: Public-Private day to discuss transportation difficult time developing a Partnerships p. 4 policy issues important to their House bill that can generate the communities and regions. 218 votes needed to pass the 1. Restore Tax Benefits for House, and won’t debate any Deductibility of Mass Transit More on the Southwest Congressional policy on bill for the next few weeks. Costs to Equal Vehicle Parking Chief p. 5 transit and rail funding will be Benefit. The federal income tax completed this year through The FY’2013 DOT provision allowing employees An Open Letter two major legislative vehicles: Appropriations bills—providing to exclude up to $230 of their to Gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority (CTA)
    06JN023apr 2006.qxp 6/21/2006 12:37 PM Page 1 All Aboard! Detailed Fare Information First Bus / Last Bus Times All CTA and Pace buses are accessible X to people with disabilities. This map gives detailed information about Chicago Transit # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. # ROUTE & TERMINALS WEEKDAYS SATURDAY SUNDAY/HOL. Authority bus and elevated/subway train service, and shows Type of Fare* Full Reduced Reduced fares are for: You can use this chart to determine days, hours and frequency of service, and Fare Payment Farareboebox Topop where each route begins and ends. BROADWAY DIVISION ILLINOIS CENTER/NORTH WESTERN EXPRESS Pace suburban bus and Metra commuter train routes in the 36 70 Division/Austin east to Division/Clark 4:50a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 5:05a-12:40a 122 CASH FARE Accepted on buses only. $2 $1 Devon/Clark south to Polk/Clark 4:00a-12:10a 4:20a-12:00m 4:20a-12:15a Canal/Washington east to Wacker/Columbus 6:40a-9:15a & CTA service area. It is updated twice a year, and available at CTA Children 7 through 11 BUSES: CarCardsds It shows the first and last buses in each direction on each route, traveling Polk/Clark north to Devon/Clark 4:55a-1:20a 4:55a-1:05a 4:50a-1:15a Division/Clark west to Division/Austin 5:30a-1:20a 5:40a-1:20a 5:45a-1:20a 3:40p-6:10p Exact fare (both coins and bills accepted). No cash transfers available. years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Accident Details and Addressee Status(Es
    Attachment 4 - Rail Recommendations Classified as "Closed -- Unacceptable Response" Recommendation Report Mode: Rail Addressee Status: CUA Product/Notation Id 54771 / Accident Date: 06/20/98 Issue Date: 01/13/00 Most Wanted City/State: Burnt Cabins, PA Accident #: HWY98MH033 No List: The National Transportation Safety Board has investigated many incidents in all passenger transportation modes in which the use of a licit medication by a vehicle operator has been causal or contributory. As a result, the safety board has previously recommended that various agencies take certain actions to address issues pertaining to the use of medications. Closed - Unacceptable Recommendation # : R-00-001 Overall Status: Priority: CLASS II Action TO THE FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION: Establish, with assistance from experts on the effects of pharmacological agents on human performance and alertness, procedures or criteria by which train operating crewmembers who medically require substances not on the U.S. Dept. of Transportation's list of approved medications may be allowed, when appropriate, to use those medications when performing their duties. # of Addressees: 1 Overall Date Closed: 05/15/15 Addressee: FRA Closed - Date Closed: 05/15/15 Unacceptable Action Page 1 of 302 Attachment 4 - Rail Recommendations Classified as "Closed -- Unacceptable Response" Recommendation Report 3/19/2018 9:28:00 AM Product/Notation Id 46160 / Accident Date: 02/13/00 Issue Date: 01/23/02 Most Wanted City/State: BWI Airport, MD Accident #: DCA00MR003 No List: In 2000, the Maryland Transit Administration (MTA) experienced two similar accidents in the same location just 6 months apart. Both accidents involved the failure of an MTA LRV train to stop at the designated stopping point at the Baltimore- Washington International Airport Light Rail Station (BWI Airport Station).
    [Show full text]
  • I for Off Season Travel
    Vol. 5, No. 2 February 15, 1978 Bargain Excursion Fares Offered I For Off Season Travel Amtrak is offering bargain fares on tickets are 33 per cent off regular Harrisburg through Pittsburgh to all 21 routes beginning January 31, with round-trip coach fares and may be us­ other stations on both routes. Harris­ savings up to 46 per cent off regular ed within 32 days of the first travel burg fares apply to points west only. fares. Still other excursion fares go date. Night Owl fares will not apply Silver Meteor, Silver Star and Pal­ into effect February 10. from February 17-20 or March 18-26. metto - Round-trip coach excursion The excursion fares, most of which Broadway Limited and National fares already in effect for New York­ apply only to round-trip coach travel, Limited - Passengers on both routes Florida and Baltimore/Washington­ are intended to boost ridership during may take advantage of a seven-day Florida passengers will remain in ef­ the late winter and spring months, round-trip coach excursion fare for fect until October 29. Passengers usually a light travel period. only $5 more than the one-way fare. from New York to any Florida So me of the fares are new while The excursion fare applies between destination pay only $109 for a others are extensions of fares already end point cities, and stations from round-trip coach ticket, while pas- in effect, or rein statements of fares which expired last November. Most of the discounted fares are not of­ Gareliek Named Executive Vice President fered during holiday periods such as the Washington's Birthday or Easter Martin Garelick, vi ce president of with traditional railroad organiza­ weekends.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, JANUARY 30, 1996 No. 12 Senate The Senate met at 11 a.m., and was Wednesday with the expectation that Mr. MURKOWSKI. Mr. President, I called to order by the President pro the session will be largely devoted to ask unanimous consent that the order tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. morning business, and rollcall votes for the quorum call be rescinded. would not be anticipated on Wednes- The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without PRAYER day. objection, it is so ordered. The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John Senators should be aware that on If the Senator from Alaska will with- Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: Thursday the Senate will be attending hold for a moment? Dear God, we say with the author of a joint meeting of Congress starting at Mr. MURKOWSKI. Certainly. Hebrews, ‘‘This hope we have as an an- 11:45 a.m. to hear an address by French chor of the soul.’’—Hebrews 6:19. President Jacques Chirac. Following f Thank You for the anchor of hope in that joint meeting, the Senate is ex- You we have for the storms of life. We pected to debate and vote on cloture on lower our anchor and it holds in the or in relation to the Lugar-Dole farm RESERVATION OF LEADER TIME bedrock of Your faithfulness in spite of bill. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Under the billows of adversity and the blasts Additional votes could occur during the previous order, the leadership time of conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • SATURDAY, AUGUST 5Th
    JUNE 26, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 6 Coming up: POOL PARTY AND COOKOUT AT JIM & ALICE SOUTH’S MONDAY, JULY 17TH OFFICIAL OPERATIONS MONDAY & THURSDAY th th JULY 24 & 27 SUMMER OPEN HOUSE….SATURDAY, AUGUST 5th The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 6 ■■■■■ JUNE 2017 SUMMER ISSUE CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….3 Treasurer………………....Will Baker Contests ................ ………..3 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Clinic……………..….…….5 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .11 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Form 19 Orders ...
    [Show full text]