RUN Spring 2012V3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RUN Spring 2012V3 NEWSLETTER Spring 2012 Vol. 9, Issue 2 RUN Conference Attendees Will Monitor Proposed Federal Actions on Rail Individual By Jack Corbett FY2013 DOT Appropriations of the FY2013 year. Getting Highlights Act. Last week the U.S. Senate these measures conferenced for When RUN’s Regional passed a two-year Surface final Congressional approvals Conference convenes in the Transportation Reauthorization by the House and Senate will be Amtrak Accelerates, NS Nation’s Capital next month Act, 74-22, that continues difficult. (Friday, April 20), many mass transit funding at current Puts on Brakes p. 2 Among the transit and rail attendees will have visited the levels, funded from Federal gas issues RUN conferees will offices of their Congressional tax revenues. The Republican have discussed with their G Train Extension p. 3 delegations and Congressional majority in the House of Congressional offices are the transportation leaders the prior Representatives has had a following: Public-Private day to discuss transportation difficult time developing a Partnerships p. 4 policy issues important to their House bill that can generate the communities and regions. 218 votes needed to pass the 1. Restore Tax Benefits for House, and won’t debate any Deductibility of Mass Transit More on the Southwest Congressional policy on bill for the next few weeks. Costs to Equal Vehicle Parking Chief p. 5 transit and rail funding will be Benefit. The federal income tax completed this year through The FY’2013 DOT provision allowing employees An Open Letter two major legislative vehicles: Appropriations bills—providing to exclude up to $230 of their to Gov. Patrick p. 6 a multi-year authorization funding for Federal Transit monthly mass transit costs from bill for highway and mass Administration grants and for their taxable income expired transit (Surface Transportation Amtrak—will be developed last December. Currently NJ Transit Improves Reauthorization) and the before the October 1, 2012, start (Continued on page 10) Transparency p. 8 Join Us at RUN’s Third Regional Rail RUN to the Nation’s Capital p. 11 Conference in Washington, DC By Richard Rudolph The conference, which is being Chief, Product Management for Maine’s Mountain Chair, Rail Users’ Network held on Friday, April 20 at the Amtrak, will shed light on what Division Line p. 15 American Public Transportation Amtrak is doing in the short run The deadline for early Association headquarters, 1666 to improve long distance service. registration for the Rail K St. N.W., Washington, DC, Our keynoter, Don Phillips of Users Network 2012 regional will provide participants an Trains Magazine, will examine conference -“Keeping Connected opportunity to learn first-hand what needs to be done at both the by Rail: Making our Voices what is going on in Congress state and national level to create a “Heard” is fast approaching. The regarding Amtrak and transit world-class rail passenger system registration fee is still $50. After funding issues. Art Guzzetti, Vice in the United States. Participants March 31, it’s $60, and $75 at President of Policy at APTA, will attending the conference will also the door. The fee includes all provide a layout of the land in DC, hear from rail activists who are conference materials /handout, and what we can expect, given the working at the grassroots and as well as a continental breakfast, present Congress, and prospects state level to improve and expand a hearty lunch and an afternoon for change, both in the near future service in the Mid-Atlantic Region. beverage break. and long term. Brian Rosenwald, (Continued on page 10) RAIL USERS’ NETWORK NEWSLETTER Page 2 of 16 MICHIGAN AGAIN Successful 110-mph Rollout Followed by NS Slow Orders Leaves State and Amtrak Angry, Riders Confused By F.K. Plous Things went downhill after that as Going faster…slowly the Interstate highway system and the For riders of Amtrak’s Chicago-Detroit federally financed airport program created Raising the speed limit took a while. Wolverine service the months of February competition for which the New York Central The software, which included millions and March truly were Dickensian—“the had no practical answer. The Interstate of lines of code, needed lots of patient best of times and the worst of times.” Commerce Commission didn’t help either debugging. State cooperation was needed, when in 1955 it clamped a passenger-train because numerous grade crossings had to The “best” of times came Feb. 13, when speed limit of 79 mph on all main lines not be closed and the remaining ones beefed Amtrak, for the first time, began operating equipped with either Automatic Train Stop up with more modern gate technology. its regularly scheduled passenger trains at or cab signaling. Ridership dropped, and New welded rail had to be laid on fresh 110 miles per hour over the full 97 miles when Amtrak took over the train service in ballast, curves had to be recalibrated for of track it owns between Porter, IN and 1971 it operated only three daily Chicago- faster train operation, and new sidings Kalamazoo, MI. The speedup affected Detroit round trips. The overnighters to had to be installed. Top speeds were all three Chicago-Detroit Wolverine New York already were long gone. frequencies plus the single daily Blue Water raised from 79 to 90 mph in 2002 and the software upgraded again. Then in 2005, frequency between Chicago and Port 1976: Enter Amtrak Huron, MI. That train leaves the Wolverine the limit was raised to 95 mph, where route 23 miles east of Kalamazoo and as an owner it stayed while the software was further uses the Canadian National’s former C fine-tuned. Originally, only the middle Grand Trunk Western for the balance of The origins of today’s higher speeds go portion of the line was covered by the the trip. back to 1976, when the U.S. Railway new technology, with the western 12 miles Administration created Conrail out of the between Porter and New Buffalo and the The Porter-Kalamazoo segment is part of wreckage of the doomed Penn Central and eastern extremity between Kalamazoo and the original Michigan Central line opened five other bankrupt Northeastern carriers. Oshtemo left out. between Chicago and Detroit in 1852. Since Conrail was to be a pure freight Under New York Central ownership carrier, Penn Central facilities dedicated Finally, on Feb. 6 of this year, Amtrak and after 1867, it became the premier route largely to passenger trains were distributed MDOT announced that on Feb 13 all 97 between Chicago and Detroit as well to the new government-owned carriers that miles of track would be fully commissioned as a popular alternate route to the were springing up: Metro North Railroad for a top speed of 110 mph. Two days Central’s Water Level Route for trips got the old New York Central’s commuter later, I and my colleagues Jim Coston between Chicago and New York. Popular routes out of Manhattan, Southeastern and Scott Braverman rode the 7:30 a.m. overnighters such as the Wolverine, the Pennsylvania Transportation Authority Wolverine, No. 350, to a meeting in Ann New York Special and the Canadian Niagara (SEPTA) inherited the Pennsy and Reading Arbor. The 110 mph track performed picked up New York- and Boston-bound commuter routes serving Philadelphia, superbly, but the Horizon business/food passengers at Kalamazoo, Battle Creek, and Amtrak got the Northeast Corridor, service car in which we rode did not. The Jackson, Ann Arbor and Detroit, followed Chicago Union Station and the 97 miles Horizons, which were adapted from a the New York Central’s Detroit River of former MC track on the Chicago- Pullman Co. commuter-car design, were a Tunnel to Windsor, Ont., and then raced Detroit route. Conrail consolidated all of little noisy—although the ride was smooth. across 246 miles of Southern Ontario its Chicago-Detroit through freight on the I clocked the train several times, but the flatlands on the Vanderbilt-controlled Water Level Route, which has a connecting fastest speed I was able to record on the Canada Southern before rejoining the track up to the MC at Jackson, MI, eastbound trip was 101 mph. Still, it was a Water Level Route at Buffalo. In the bypassing the Porter-Kalamazoo segment thrill to be traveling at more than 90 mph streamliner era, Chicago-Detroit day- and leaving it free for passenger service. on track outside the Northeast Corridor. It trippers boarded speedsters like the Amtrak rebuilt the track and eliminated reminded me of my many trips during the Mercury and the Twilight Limited, both the slow orders, but in the late 1990s it 1950s on the Chicago & Northwestern’s of which hit speeds of up to 100 mph. began taking the pike up to the next level, “400” streamliners and the Milwaukee In 1954, the Twilight covered the 284- installing a pioneer Positive Train Control Road’s Hiawathas, both of which regularly mile run in a flat five hours—with six technology to replace the deteriorating exceeded 100 mph. intermediate stops. ABS system. (Continued on page 14) RAIL USERS’ NETWORK NEWSLETTER Page 3 of 16 Keep the G Train Extension! By Andrew Albert the G train, which formerly ended its was cut back to Court Square, there was southbound run at Smith-9th Street, was a promise of more-frequent service. That The Culver Viaduct spans the Gowanus extended to Church Avenue, five stops was debatable, however.) Canal in Brooklyn, at times reaching a further down the F line, stopping at 4th height of 90 feet above the street. The Avenue, 7th Avenue, 15th St-Prospect Now, riders and advocacy groups are viaduct was opened in 1933 and is served Park, Ft.
Recommended publications
  • GAO-02-398 Intercity Passenger Rail: Amtrak Needs to Improve Its
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Ron Wyden GAO U.S. Senate April 2002 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Amtrak Needs to Improve Its Decisionmaking Process for Its Route and Service Proposals GAO-02-398 Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief 2 Background 3 Status of the Growth Strategy 6 Amtrak Overestimated Expected Mail and Express Revenue 7 Amtrak Encountered Substantial Difficulties in Expanding Service Over Freight Railroad Tracks 9 Conclusions 13 Recommendation for Executive Action 13 Agency Comments and Our Evaluation 13 Scope and Methodology 16 Appendix I Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes, Fiscal Year 2001 18 Appendix II Amtrak Route Actions, January 1995 Through December 2001 20 Appendix III Planned Route and Service Actions Included in the Network Growth Strategy 22 Appendix IV Amtrak’s Process for Evaluating Route and Service Proposals 23 Amtrak’s Consideration of Operating Revenue and Direct Costs 23 Consideration of Capital Costs and Other Financial Issues 24 Appendix V Market-Based Network Analysis Models Used to Estimate Ridership, Revenues, and Costs 26 Models Used to Estimate Ridership and Revenue 26 Models Used to Estimate Costs 27 Page i GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking Appendix VI Comments from the National Railroad Passenger Corporation 28 GAO’s Evaluation 37 Tables Table 1: Status of Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions, as of December 31, 2001 7 Table 2: Operating Profit (Loss), Operating Ratio, and Profit (Loss) per Passenger of Each Amtrak Route, Fiscal Year 2001, Ranked by Profit (Loss) 18 Table 3: Planned Network Growth Strategy Route and Service Actions 22 Figure Figure 1: Amtrak’s Route System, as of December 2001 4 Page ii GAO-02-398 Amtrak’s Route and Service Decisionmaking United States General Accounting Office Washington, DC 20548 April 12, 2002 The Honorable Ron Wyden United States Senate Dear Senator Wyden: The National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) is the nation’s intercity passenger rail operator.
    [Show full text]
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • __History of Kew Depot and It's Routes
    HISTORY OF KEW DEPOT AND ITS ROUTES Page 1 HISTORY of KEW DEPOT and the ROUTES OPERATED by KEW Compiled and written by Hugh Waldron MCILT CA 1500 The word tram and tramway are derived from Scottish words indicating the type of truck and the tracks used in coal mines. 1807 The first Horse tram service in the world commences operation between Swansea and Mumbles in Wales. 12th September 1854 At 12.20 pm first train departs Flinders Street Station for Sandridge (Port Melbourne) First Steam operated railway line in Australia. The line is eventually converted to tram operation during December 1987 between the current Southbank Depot and Port Melbourne. The first rail lines in Australia operated in Newcastle Collieries operated by horses in 1829. Then a five-mile line on the Tasman Peninsula opened in 1836 and powered by convicts pushing the rail vehicle. The next line to open was on 18/5/1854 in South Australia (Goolwa) and operated by horses. 1864 Leonard John Flannagan was born in Richmond. After graduating he became an Architect and was responsible for being the Architect building Malvern Depot 1910, Kew Depot 1915 and Hawthorn Depot 1916. He died 2nd November 1945. September 1873 First cable tramway in the world opens in Clay Street, San Francisco, USA. 1877 Steam tramways commence. Victoria only had two steam tramways both opened 1890 between Sorrento Pier to Sorrento Back Beach closed on 20th March 1921 (This line also operated horse trams when passenger demand was not high.) and Bendigo to Eaglehawk converted to electric trams in 1903.
    [Show full text]
  • May 22, 2017 Volume 37
    MAY 22, 2017 ■■■■■■■■■■■ VOLUME 37 ■■■■■■■■■■ NUMBER 5 A Club in Transition 3 The Semaphore David N. Clinton, Editor-in-Chief CONTRIBUTING EDITORS Southeastern Massachusetts…………………. Paul Cutler, Jr. “The Operator”………………………………… Paul Cutler III Cape Cod News………………………………….Skip Burton Boston Globe Reporter………………………. Brendan Sheehan Boston Herald Reporter……………………… Jim South Wall Street Journal Reporter....………………. Paul Bonanno, Jack Foley Rhode Island News…………………………… Tony Donatelli Empire State News…………………………… Dick Kozlowski Amtrak News……………………………. .. Rick Sutton, Russell Buck “The Chief’s Corner”……………………… . Fred Lockhart PRODUCTION STAFF Publication………………………………… ….. Al Taylor Al Munn Jim Ferris Web Page …………………..…………………… Savery Moore Club Photographer……………………………….Joe Dumas The Semaphore is the monthly (except July) newsletter of the South Shore Model Railway Club & Museum (SSMRC) and any opinions found herein are those of the authors thereof and of the Editors and do not necessarily reflect any policies of this organization. The SSMRC, as a non-profit organization, does not endorse any position. Your comments are welcome! Please address all correspondence regarding this publication to: The Semaphore, 11 Hancock Rd., Hingham, MA 02043. ©2017 E-mail: [email protected] Club phone: 781-740-2000. Web page: www.ssmrc.org VOLUME 37 ■■■■■ NUMBER 5 ■■■■■ MAY 2017 CLUB OFFICERS BILL OF LADING President………………….Jack Foley Vice-President…….. …..Dan Peterson Chief’s Corner ...... …….….4 Treasurer………………....Will Baker A Club in Transition….…..13 Secretary……………….....Dave Clinton Contests ................ ………..4 Chief Engineer……….. .Fred Lockhart Directors……………… ...Bill Garvey (’18) Clinic……………..….…….7 ……………………….. .Bryan Miller (‘18) ……………………… ….Roger St. Peter (’17) Editor’s Notes. ….…....… .13 …………………………...Rick Sutton (‘17) Form 19 Orders .... ………..4 Members .............. ….…....14 Memories ............. .………..5 Potpourri .............. ..……….7 ON THE COVER: The first 25% of our building was Running Extra .....
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 4-13-2010 MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Recommended Citation Maine Department of Transportation, "MaineDOT Region 2 : Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program, April 13, 2010" (2010). Transportation Documents. 1381. https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs/1381 This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Transportation at Digital Maine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transportation Documents by an authorized administrator of Digital Maine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MaineDOT 2010 Maintenance Surface Treatment (MST) Paving Program MaineDOT Map ID Municipalities Anticipated Road Segment Description Miles Region # Affected 2010 Dates Route 105 - from the southerly junction of Routes 131 and 105, 2 21 Appleton, Hope 11.34 8/2 - 10/1 extending southerly to the Camden/Hope town line Route 100 - from 1.84 miles east of the Benton/Fairfield town line to 2 17 Benton 2.95 9/8 - 9/21 0.47 mile westerly of the Benton/Clinton town line Turner/Biscay Road - from the junction with Biscay Road, Bremen 2 16 Bremen 3.04 8/2 - 10/1 to the junction with Route 32, Bremen Route 139 - from the intersection of Route 137/7 in Brooks, 2 114 Brooks, Knox 8.78 6/28 - 8/13 extending northerly to the junction of Routes 139 and 220 Weeks Mills Road - from the intersection of
    [Show full text]
  • No. 13 Mail & Express
    No. 13 Mail & Express - Daily except Sunday and Monday Buffalo-Englewood 1 express (exc.Tues.) Buffalo-Oakland (To CB&Q 29) 1 express " NY-WS - Phoenix (To CB&Q 3-55) 1 express " " Kansas City " 1 express " " Denver (To CB&Q 29) 1 Stge mail " " " 1-3 Stge mail " Oakland " 1 Stge mail " Omaha " 1 Stge mail " Council Bluffs " 1 Stge mail " St Paul (To Milw #57) 1 Stge mail " Spokane " 1 Stge mail " Seattle " 1 Stge mail " Milwaukee " 1 express " Minneapolis " 1 express " St Paul " 1 express (exc. Tues.) " Seattle " 1 express (Tues.) " Spokane " 1 express (exc. Tues.) " Portland " 1 express (exc. Tues.) " Milwaukee (to Milw 55) 2 express " Chicago (To #357 Detroit) 1 express (exc. DFH) " Jackson (To #369 Detroit) 1-3 express " Detroit 1 Flexi van flat mail (irregular) " " 1 SX (exc. DFH) New York-Detroit (from #59 Buffalo) 1 Stge Mail Hoboken-Detroit (from EL#1-131 Bflo) 1 express (exc. Tues.) Buffalo-StPaul (To Milw #57) Stove Rider NY-WS-Englewood On Saturday will pick up at Detroit one car express for StPaul routed via Milw. 57 beyond Chicago. This car to be cut in train next ahead of the Buffalo-StPaul express car. 5-4-65 No. 17 The Wolverine - Daily except Sunday Buffalo-Detroit 1 Stge mail (exc. Tues. AM) Philadelphia-Detroit (from PRR 571 Buffalo) 1 Express (exc. Mon. & Tues. AM) (from PRR 571 Buffalo) 1 Express (irregular) Buffalo-Detroit 1 Stge mail (exc. Mon.) 1 Flexi van flat (2 vans mail) NY WS " (exc. Tues.) 1 Flexi van flat (2 vans mail) NY WS-Chicago (exc.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements
    Metro Transit Central-South (Sector 5) Final Plan 4.5 Public Outreach Conclusions Stakeholder and public comments provided guidance to improve various elements of the plan. About one fifth of the comments favored the plan. Four cities, one county and the University of Minnesota also supported the plan. Several neighborhood groups expressed concerns about specific elements of the plan. The majority of comments (over 60 percent) were in response to the proposed route elimination or service reductions on Routes 7, 8, 18, 19, 22, 52B, 84, 538 and 539. Another frequent comment was concern regarding increased transfers and loss of direct service to key destinations. For example, the proposed elimination of some direct service to the University of Minnesota was the source of many complaints. The Concept Plan was modified to address many of the stakeholder and customer concerns within the current operating budget and the tenants identified in the previous chapters. Of the 55 routes in the sector, 32 or 58 percent of routes were modified in response to public comment. The final plan preserves geographic coverage in all of the urban area, and most of the suburban areas, and direct service to the University of Minnesota from France Avenue/ W. 50th Street, Cedar Avenue/Portland Avenue and Snelling Avenue. This final plan, as modified to address the concerns raised during the public outreach phase, is supported by all five cities and the two counties found in the study area. 5 Planned Transit Service Improvements 5.1 Planned Transit Service Network The service improvement program begins with a high-to-medium frequency grid network of local service in high-density population and employment areas such as south Minneapolis and St.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-Of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016
    Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 Accident Report NTSB/RAR-17/02 National PB2018-100263 Transportation Safety Board NTSB/RAR-17/02 PB2018-100263 Notation 57150 Adopted November 14, 2017 Railroad Accident Report Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment Chester, Pennsylvania April 3, 2016 National Transportation Safety Board 490 L’Enfant Plaza, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20594 National Transportation Safety Board. 2017. Amtrak Train Collision with Maintenance-of-Way Equipment, Chester, Pennsylvania, April 3, 2016. NTSB/RAR-17/02. Washington, DC. Abstract: On April 3, 2016, about 7:50 a.m. eastern daylight time, southbound Amtrak train 89 (train 89) struck a backhoe with a worker inside at milepost 15.7 near Chester, Pennsylvania. The train was authorized to operate on main track 3 (track 3) at the maximum authorized speed of 110 mph. Beginning on the morning of April 1, Amtrak had scheduled track-bed restoration―ballast vacuuming—at milepost 15.7 on track 2 on the Philadelphia to Washington Line. Track 2 had to be taken out of service between control points Baldwin (milepost 11.7) and Hook (milepost 16.8) for the 55 hour duration of the project. As train 89 approached milepost 15.7, the locomotive engineer saw equipment and workers on and near track 3 and initiated an emergency brake application. The train speed was 106 mph before the emergency brake application and 99 mph when it struck the backhoe. Two roadway workers were killed, and 39 other people were injured. Amtrak estimated property damages to be $2.5 million.
    [Show full text]
  • RCED-98-151 Intercity Passenger Rail B-279203
    United States General Accounting Office GAO Report to Congressional Committees May 1998 INTERCITY PASSENGER RAIL Financial Performance of Amtrak’s Routes GAO/RCED-98-151 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-279203 May 14, 1998 The Honorable Richard C. Shelby Chairman The Honorable Frank R. Lautenberg Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation Committee on Appropriations United States Senate The Honorable Frank R. Wolf Chairman The Honorable Martin Olav Sabo Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Transportation and Related Agencies Committee on Appropriations House of Representatives Since it began operations in 1971, the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) has never been profitable and has received about $21 billion in federal subsidies for operating and capital expenses. In December 1994, at the direction of the administration, Amtrak established the goal of eliminating its need for federal operating subsidies by 2002. However, despite efforts to control expenses and improve efficiency, Amtrak has only reduced its annual net loss from $834 million in fiscal year 1994 to $762 million in fiscal year 1997, and it projects that its net loss will grow to $845 million this fiscal year.1 Amtrak remains heavily dependent on substantial federal operating and capital subsidies. Given Amtrak’s continued dependence on federal operating subsidies, the Conference Report to the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 1998 directed us to examine the financial (1) performance of Amtrak’s current routes, (2) implications for Amtrak of multiyear capital requirements and declining federal operating subsidies, and (3) effect on Amtrak of reforms contained in the Amtrak Reform and Accountability Act of 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Department of Transportation
    NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FY 2018-2027 STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DVRPC - FY 2018 Authorized and Unauthorized Projects (State Funds - $ millions) PROGRAM TRANSFER TRANSACTION TRANSACTION PROJECT NAME FUND PHASE AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL DATE BALANCE Center Square Rd (CR 620), Rt 295 Overpass (DB #D1719) STATE CD $0.500 $0.000 $0.000 $0.500 Duck Island Landfill, Site Remediation (DB #99334) STATE EC $0.100 $0.100 ($0.200) 11/27/2017 $0.000 DVRPC, Future Projects (DB #D026) STATE ERC $15.000 $0.000 $0.000 $15.000 Local County Aid, DVRPC (DB #X41C1) STATE ERC $30.040 $0.000 ($30.040) 10/17/2017 $0.000 Local Municipal Aid, DVRPC (DB #X98C1) STATE ERC $26.690 $0.000 ($26.690) 10/17/2017 $0.000 Route 1, Penns Neck Improvements (CR 571) (DB #17422) STATE PE $0.300 $0.173 $0.000 $0.473 Route 29, Cass Street to Calhoun Street, Drainage (DB # STATE ROW $0.250 $0.000 ($0.125) 10/24/2017 $0.125 07319B) Route 30, Gibbsboro Road (CR 686) (DB #16319) STATE DES $0.800 $0.000 $0.000 $0.800 Route 38 and Lenola Road (CR 608) (DB #15353) STATE PE $0.600 $0.000 $0.000 $0.600 Route 38, South Church Street (CR 607) to Fellowship Road STATE DES $2.500 $0.881 ($3.381) 6/20/2018 $0.000 (CR 673), Operational and Safety Improvements (DB #12307) Route 41 and Deptford Center Road (DB #15302) STATE PE $0.650 $0.000 $0.000 $0.650 Route 42, Ardmore Ave to Camden County Line, Pavement (DB STATE ROW $3.100 $0.000 ($1.478) 11/3/2017 $1.622 #12306) Route 42, Bridges over Blackwood Railroad Trail (DB #12313) STATE ROW $1.000 $0.000 ($0.246) 10/24/2017 $0.754 Route 45, Bridge over Woodbury Creek (DB #14348) STATE PE $0.400 $0.000 $0.000 $0.400 Route 47, Bridge over Route 295 (DB #15310) STATE ROW $0.100 $0.000 $0.000 $0.100 Route 47, Grove St.
    [Show full text]
  • Citylink Route Booklet (PDF)
    SCHEDULE BOOKLET EFFECTIVE DATE: JUNE 4, 2018 � REVISION: JUNE 2019 1 3. Group Transit Orientation A travel trainer provides an overview of accessibility features in transit vehicles and how to plan trips, pay and travel safely in the community while using fixed-route buses. Groups and Individuals can sign up for travel training by calling 325-676- 6BUS Option 2. Fixed-Route Service Fixed-route bus service is CityLink’s core service. In this service, ADA compliant transit buses are operated over an established route structure on a fixed schedule. There are 14 routes (8 weekday and 6 Saturday routes) on the Welcome to CityLink! CityLink route system. Transfers occur at CityLink at 1189 S. 2nd Street. This service is offered from 6:15 a.m. CityLink is the public transit system for the City of Abilene. We to 6:15 p.m. Monday through Friday, and Saturday from provide safe, reliable, and affordable transportation for the 7:15 a.m. to 6:15 p.m., except for designated holidays. citizens of Abilene. For more information call 325-676-6BUS Option 1. What We Do ADA Paratransit We provide eight weekday and six Saturday fixed-route routes, which CityLink provides origin to destination transit service are distributed geographically across the city (See System Maps). In for persons with disabilities who are certified under addition, we provide door-to-door paratransit service and Evening the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Each curb-to-curb service. vehicle is equipped with wheelchair securement for Service Days passenger safety. Paratransit drivers are trained to assist passengers boarding and exiting the vehicles.
    [Show full text]