Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322

Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used.

The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%.

As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight.

Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays. Recurring delays which are regular daily delays peaked by commuter traffic to and from work were given 20% of the overall weight. Non‐recurring or incident delays which result from crashes and other type of incidents where disabled vehicles block the traffic flow were given 10% of the overall weight. These delays occur less frequently and amount to less total delay during the year. Therefore are given less weight.

In giving scores for delays, they need to be normalized for comparison. As delays are important to consider on both a user perspective (How much extra time does it take to get to work?) and a system perspective (How much overall delay occurs at a specific intersection or interchange?), measures for both were used. The user measure is delay per vehicle mile. The system measure is delay per roadway mile. The percentage weights for the overall score for each delay measure are as follows:

Recurring delay per vehicle mile ‐ 10%, Recurring delay per roadway mile ‐ 10% Non‐recurring delay per vehicle mile ‐ 5%, Non‐recurring delay per roadway mile ‐ 5%

Most of the individual category scores are based on a scale in proportion to a high end value being assigned a score of “10”. The cutoff value to be assigned a score of “10” is not the highest value, but some value in the top 1%. The highest values were not used so that the scores are not scaled to very high outliers and at least some links would be given a score of “10” for the given category. All scores for links with values below the cutoff value are taken as “10 * link value / cutoff value.

In general, most of the data values are skewed with few very high values and high concentrations of lower values. To score the categories and have reasonable overall scores, it was desirable to have average scores somewhere around a “5” to achieve a good balance of high, medium and low scores for the overall CMS network. To achieve a desirable range of scores for each category, most of the category values were rescaled by using the value to the Nth power, where N ranged from 0.2 to 0.4. The more extreme the data is skewed from high to low, the lower the value is for the exponent. For the V/C ratios no rescaling was done. For AADTs, an exponent of 0.4 was used. For all delay measures, an exponent of 0.2 was used.

For the categories representing roadway usage characteristics, function class was scored such that expressways and divided principal arterials would have almost the same priority value as Interstate highways and freeways having geometric characteristics similar to Interstates. The scoring also accounts for whether the roadway is a National Highway System (NHS) route. Almost all of the roadways that are classified as principal arterials or higher were designated as NHS routes. Interstate and selected non‐Interstate freeway routes including the GSP, NJTPK, ACE, NJ 24, and NJ 55 were given a score of “10”. To treat these non‐interstate routes as Interstates in the CMS, they were reassigned an Interstate function class code. Expressways and divided principal arterials were given a score of “9” if they are NHS routes, and a score of “7” if they are not. Undivided principal arterials were given a score of “8” if they are NHS routes, and a score of “6” if they are not.

A limited number of routes that have functional classifications below principal arterial are also classified as NHS routes. Minor arterials were given a score of “4” if they are not NHS routes and a score of “6” if they are NHS routes. Urban collectors and rural major collector roads were given a score of “2” if they are not NHS routes, and a score of “4” if they are NHS routes. Rural major collector roads were given a score of “1”, and local routes are given a score of “0”. (None of these lower level roadways are NHS routes.)

For the Strategic Network, any roadway facility identified as a Critical Corridor or a Critical Connector was given a score of “10”. All other State routes were given a score of “5” and non‐ state routes a score of “0”.

For the AADT volumes, the cutoff for a score of “10” was set to close to a two‐way AADT of 200,000 vehicles a day. (A cutoff value of 130 was used which is equivalent to an AADT of 192,700 ^ 0.4)

For the V/C ratios, the cutoff value for a score of “10” was set to 1.50.

For the delays measures the following are the cutoff values with the corresponding data values taken to ^ 0.2

Recurring delay per mile: 6.00 which corresponds to 7776 hours per day per mile Recurring delay per vehicle mile: 3.50 which corresponds to 525 seconds per vehicle mile Non‐recurring delay per mile: 5.00 which corresponds to 3125 hours per day per mile Non‐recurring delay per vehicle mile: 2.50 which corresponds to 97.5 seconds per vehicle mile

The methodology used for the congestion priority rankings for the CIS FY1322 Capital Plan is summaried as follows:

Congestion Relief CMS Scoring Methodology to Rank Capital Projects

Scaled Values

Exponent Rescaled Cutoff Value for Category Measure Weight Cutoff for "10" Rescaling Value Value AM Peak V/C 20% 1.5 1.0 1.5 PM Peak V/C 20% 1.5 1.0 1.5 2 Way AADT 10% 192,690 0.4 130.0 Recurring Delay per Mile 10% 7776 0.2 6.0 (Vehicle hours per Day) Recurring delay per Vehicle Mile 10% 525.22 0.2 3.5 (seconds per day) Non‐recurring Delay per Mile 5% 3125 0.2 5.0 (Vehicle hours per day) Non‐Recurring delay per Vehicle Mile 5% 97.66 0.2 2.5 (seconds per day)

Note: (Cutoff value for a “10”) ^ Exponent for Rescaling Value= Rescaled Cutoff Value

Assigned Values

Category Measure Weight Score Value Description 10 Critical Corridor on Critical Connector Strategic Network 10% 5 Other State Route 0 County or Municipal Route

10 Interstate, Interstate Type Freeway (on NHS) 9 Expressway or Divided Principal Arterial on NHS 7 Expressway or Divided Principal Arterial not on NHS 8 Undivided Principal Arterial on NHS 6 Undivided Principal Arterial not on NHS Function Class with 10% 6 Minor Arterial on NHS NHS 4 Minor Arterial not on NHS 4 Urban Collector or Rural Major Collector on NHS 2 Urban Collector or Rural Major Collector not on NHS 1 Rural Minor Collector (not on NHS) 0 Local Road (not on NHS)

To develop priority scores for each specified CIS project, the link data is gathered for all the relevant project links. The highest overall link score is taken as the project score. The projects are then ranked in the order of the highest link scores.

FY 2013-22 Capital Plan Safety Management Projects CMS Ranking

Begin End Begin End MPO Project Project Congested On Congested DBNUM SRI ROUTE MP MP SRI_2 ROUTE 2 MP 2 MP 2 Project Name County Region Score Rank Places Type Corridor Route 287/78, I-287/ 202/ 206 04389 00000287__ 287 20.90 22.40 00000078__ 78 30.10 31.21 Interchange Improvements SOMERSET NJTPA 7.19 1 Interchange Yes Route 1, Southbound, Nassau Park Boulevard to Quaker Bridge 01330A 00000001__ 1 7.61 8.69 00000533__ CR 533 7.96 8.16 Mall Overpass MERCER DVRPC 7.17 2 NA Yes Route 46, Main Street to Vicinity of Frederick Place, Safety 93287A 00000046__ 46 69.18 69.80 00000503__ CR 503 3.16 3.36 Improvements BERGEN NJTPA 6.88 3 Intersection Yes Route 22, EB, Auxiliary Lane 02374C 00000022__ 22 52.80 53.00 between U-Turns H and G UNION NJTPA 6.76 4 NA Yes Route 168, I-295 Interchange X227A2 00000168__ 168 7.17 7.73 00000295__ 295 28.02 28.36 Improvements CAMDEN DVRPC 6.71 5 NA Yes

Route 40/322, Median Closures, 196A5A 00000040__ 40 54.12 55.58 Ivins Avenue to Spruce Avenue ATLANTIC SJTPO 6.17 6 NA Yes Route 33, Operational and Pedestrian Improvements, N09670 00000033__ 33 40.42 41.82 00000035__ 35 23.35 23.55 Neptune MONMOUTH NJTPA 5.98 7 NA No Route 31, Pennington Circle 159A 00000031__ 31 5.99 6.19 00000546__ CR 546 4.59 4.79 Safety Improvements MERCER DVRPC 5.88 8 NA Yes Route 27, Segment 2: Safety and operational improvements along Route 27 in Roselle Boro, and 10409 00000027__ 27 31.10 33.84 Elizabeth City UNION NJTPA 5.72 9 Intersection Yes Route 30, Evesham Road 93263 00000030__ 30 9.10 10.00 00000544__ CR 544 5.16 5.36 Intersection Improvements CAMDEN DVRPC 5.70 10 NA Yes Route 27, Segment 1: Safety and operational improvements along Route 27 in Rahway City, Linden 10408 00000027__ 27 28.07 30.39 City UNION NJTPA 5.27 11 NA Yes Route 130, Columbus Road/Jones 02397 00000130__ 130 46.80 47.90 00000543__ CR 543 17.75 17.95 Street BURLINGTON DVRPC 5.25 12 NA Yes Route 206, Ewing Street 04356 00000206__ 206 55.67 55.87 Intersection Improvements MERCER DVRPC 5.24 13 NA Yes Route 23, Hardyston Township 96039 00000023__ 23 27.00 31.20 Improvements SUSSEX NJTPA 5.01 14 NA Yes Route 130, Hollywood Avenue 93216 00000130__ 130 2.10 2.30 17000618__ CR 618 0.71 0.91 (CR 618) SALEM SJTPO 4.99 15 NA Yes 00000524__ CR 524 0.00 0.20 Route 206, Whitehorse Circle (CR 95040 00000206__ 206 38.81 39.95 00000533__ CR 533 0.00 0.20 533, 524) MERCER DVRPC 4.86 16 NA No FY 2013‐2022 Capital Plan Congestion Relief CMS Project Rankings

Highway Operational Improvements Begin End Begin End MPO Project Project Congested On Congested DBNUM SRI ROUTE SRI_2 ROUTE 2 Project Name County MP MP MP 2 MP 2 Region Score Rank Places Corridor Route 3, Route 46, Valley 059A 00000003__ 3 0.00 0.50 00000046__ 46 59.2 60.6 Road and Notch/Rifle Camp PASSAIC NJTPA 9.67 1 NA Yes Road Interchange, Contract A Route 3, Route 46, Valley 059B 00000003__ 3 0.00 0.50 00000046__ 46 59.2 60.6 Road and Notch/Rifle Camp PASSAIC NJTPA 9.67 2 NA Yes Road Interchange, Contract B Route 166, Toms River Twp., Highland Parkway to Old 9028 00000166__ 166 1.85 2.25 00000037__ 37 6.50 6.90 OCEAN NJTPA 8.75 3 NA Yes Freehold Road, operational improvements Route 295/42, Missing Moves, Interchange 355A 00000295__ 295 25.71 26.61 00000042__ 42 13.20 14.28 CAMDEN DVRPC 8.15 4 Yes Bellmawr Bottleneck 00000042__ 42 13.20 14.28 Route 295/42/I-76, Direct Interchange 355B 00000295__ 295 26.00 27.10 CAMDEN DVRPC 8.15 5 Yes 00000076__ 76 0.00 0.30 Connection, Contract 1 Bottleneck 00000042__ 42 13.20 14.28 Route 295/42/I-76, Direct Interchange 355C 00000295__ 295 26.55 28.15 CAMDEN DVRPC 8.15 6 Yes 00000076__ 76 0.00 0.30 Connection, Contract 2 Bottleneck 00000042__ 42 13.20 14.28 Route 295/42/I-76, Direct Interchange 355D 00000295__ 295 26.41 27.80 CAMDEN DVRPC 8.15 7 Yes 00000076__ 76 0.00 0.30 Connection, Contract 3 Bottleneck 00000042__ 42 13.20 14.28 Route 295/42/I-76, Direct Interchange 355E 00000295__ 295 26.41 27.80 CAMDEN DVRPC 8.15 8 Yes 00000076__ 76 0.00 0.30 Connection, Contract 4 Bottleneck Route 80, Route 15 93139 00000080__ 80 33.58 34.50 00000015__ 15 1.85 2.30 MORRIS NJTPA 7.78 9 Interchange Yes Interchange Route 9, Craig Road/East 97071 00000009__ 9 116.17 116.37 Freehold Road, Intersection MONMOUTH NJTPA 7.69 10 Intersection Yes Improvements Haynes Route 1&9, Haynes Ave. 94047 00000001_ 1 47.26 47.46 07141822__ 0.37 0.57 ESSEX NJTPA 7.37 11 NA Yes Ave. Operational Improvements

94071A 00000072__ 72 21.69 22.99 Route 72, East Road OCEAN NJTPA 7.29 12 NA Yes

Route 46, Little Ferry Circle, 93287 00000046__ 46 69.79 70.80 020001242_ CR 124 0.13 0.33 Operational and Safety BERGEN NJTPA 7.23 13 NA Yes Improvements Route 57/182/46, 00000182__ 182 0.0 0.96 9237 00000057__ 57 20.90 21.10 Hackettstown Mobility WARREN NJTPA 7.04 14 3 Intersections Yes 00000046__ 46 20.93 21.83 Improvements Route 31, Church Street to 08327 00000031__ 31 22.30 25.30 HUNTERDON NJTPA 6.83 15 NA Yes River Road Route 31/202, Flemington 403B 00000031__ 31 22.02 22.31 00000202__ 202 10.40 11.91 HUNTERDON NJTPA 6.83 16 NA Yes Circle Route 78, Edna Mahan 9137A 00000078__ 78 15.00 16.06 HUNTERDON NJTPA 6.71 17 NA Yes Frontage Road Route 287, River Road (CR 9169R 00000287__ 287 9.80 10.20 12000622__ CR 622 5.13 5.34 622), Interchange MIDDLESEX NJTPA 6.68 18 Interchange Yes Improvements Route 18, Edgeboro Road (CR X221C 00000018__ 18 38.38 38.99 00000527__ CR 527 42.72 42.92 527), Intersection MIDDLESEX NJTPA 6.67 19 NA Yes Improvements Route 31, NB, Minneakoning 08327A 00000031__ 31 23.84 24.92 HUNTERDON NJTPA 6.67 20 NA Yes Road to MP 24.92

93227C 00000027__ 27 23.97 24.63 12000649__ CR 649 0.43 0.63 Route 27, Wood Avenue MIDDLESEX NJTPA 6.63 21 NA Yes

Route 322, Kings Highway (CR 97112B 00000322__ 322 6.89 7.10 00000551__ CR 551 16.91 17.11 GLOUCESTER DVRPC 6.57 22 NA Yes 551) Route 22, Westbound, Vicinity 658B 00000022__ 22 56.00 56.80 of Vaux Hall Road to West of UNION NJTPA 6.51 23 NA Yes Bloy Street Route 287, Interchange 10 9169Q 00000287__ 287 10.17 10.60 00000527__ CR 527 51.48 51.68 MIDDLESEX NJTPA 6.21 24 Interchange Yes Ramp Improvements Route 202, First Avenue 02372B 00000202__ 202 23.80 24.00 00000567__ CR 567 9.41 9.61 SOMERSET NJTPA 6.19 25 NA Yes Intersection Improvements Route 23, Sussex Borough 9044 00000023__ 23 38.98 40.18 Realignment & Papakating SUSSEX NJTPA 6.16 26 NA No Creek Bridge Route 280, Harrison Township 04305 00000280__ 280 14.80 16.00 HUDSON NJTPA 5.40 27 NA Yes Operational Improvements 17.50 21.00 Route 47/347 Corridor 2149F1 00000047__ 47 00000347__ 347 0.00 8.33 CAPE MAY SJTPO 5.35 28 NA Yes 31.84 35.08 Enhancement Route 34, Colts Neck, 96040 00000034__ 34 12.90 13.60 00000537__ CR 537 57.82 58.02 Intersection Improvements (CR MONMOUTH NJTPA 5.26 29 Intersection Yes 537) Route 202, Southbound Merge 02372A 00000202__ 202 25.50 25.88 00000287__ 287 17.50 17.80 SOMERSET NJTPA 5.09 30 Interchange Yes Improvements with I-287 Ramp

Route 109, Garden State 02313 00000109__ 109 2.20 2.50 00000444__ 444 (GSP) 0.00 0.20 CAPE MAY SJTPO 4.86 31 NA Yes Parkway Intersection Garden State Parkway 98543 00000444__ 444 8.30 11.10 05000657__ CR 657 3.53 3.73 Interchange Improvements in CAPE MAY SJTPO 4.75 32 NA Yes Cape May Route 57, CR 519 Intersection 97062B 00000057__ 57 1.40 1.62 00000519__ CR 519 29.83 30.03 WARREN NJTPA 4.62 33 NA No Improvement

99312 00000130__ 130 25.50 26.50 00000047__ 47 75.00 75.20 Route 130, Brooklawn Circles CAMDEN DVRPC 4.39 34 NA No

Route 77, Swedesboro- 97049 00000077__ 77 18.55 18.75 00000538__ CR 538 7.18 7.38 Hardingville Road, Intersection GLOUCESTER DVRPC 2.25 35 NA No Improvements (CR 538) FY 2013-22 Problem Statement HOIs Priority Rankings

2013 Seq. Begin End Begin End MPO 2013 DBNUM SRI ROUTE SRI_2 ROUTE 2 Project Name County Old Rank Final ID MP MP MP 2 MP 2 Region Rank Score 19 02386 00000055__ 55 60.30 60.54 00000042__ 42 12.44 12.64 Route 55, Route 42 Interchange CAMDEN DVRPC Rank 19 8.82 1 4 05382 00000037__ 37 6.33 9.61 00000166__ 166 1.87 2.07 Route 37, Garden State Parkway to Central Avenue, Operational Improvements OCEAN NJTPA Rank 4 8.75 2 17 02322 00000676__ 676 0.00 0.70 00000076__ 76 1.79 2.20 Route 676, Main Branch of Newton Creek to North Branch of Newton Creek CAMDEN DVRPC Rank 17 8.51 3 Route 3, Eastbound Ramp K to South Service Road and Plaza J of the NJ Sports 8 04326C 00000003__ 3 7.10 7.30 Complex BERGEN NJTPA Rank 8 8.16 4 20 00360 00000024__ 24 6.00 7.17 07000649__ CR 649 0.00 0.20 Route 24 Fwy, JF Kennedy Parkway Interchange MORRIS NJTPA Rank 20 7.75 5 1 04331 00000287__ 287 2.00 2.50 00000027__ 27 20.50 21.00 Route 287/27, Lincoln Highway, Interchange Improvements MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 1 7.70 6 2 01337 00000042__ 42 1.20 6.30 Route 42, Gloucester County Operational Improvements GLOUCESTER DVRPC Rank 2 7.69 7 3 02330 00000003__ 3 0.41 0.61 16000623__ 3 0.81 1.01 Route 3, Grove Street Interchange PASSAIC NJTPA Rank 3 7.61 8 27 05359 00000009__ 9 129.82 130.05 00000035__ 35 49.18 49.38 Route 9, Route 35, Route 9 Northbound and Route 35 Northbound Merge MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 27 7.58 9 12 09353 00000280__ 280 14.01 14.21 Martin Luther King Boulevard, Orange St. Intersection Improvments ESSEX NJTPA Rank 12 7.57 10 22 06330 00000023__ 23 8.25 9.55 00000202__ 202 64.97 65.50 Route 23, Packanack Lake Road to Pequannock Twp. Line PASSAIC NJTPA Rank 22 7.34 11 14 10413 00000080__ 80 35.33 39.57 00000513__ CR 513 45.21 45.41 I-80, Operational improvements at Interchanges 35 through 39, MORRIS NJTPA Rank 14 7.30 12 9 08390 00000009__ 9 121.64 121.84 12000690__ CR 690 0.59 0.79 Route 9, Texas Road Operational Improvements (SB) MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 9 7.05 13 43 04336 00000019__ 19 2.30 2.60 00000080__ 80 58.05 58.52 Route 19, Vicinity of I-80, Operational Improvements PASSAIC NJTPA Rank 43 6.98 14 15 04381 00000035__ 35 28.90 29.10 Route 35, Monmouth Mall at southbound Route 35 MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 15 6.98 15 31 07351 00000287__ 287 66.80 67.54 00000017__ 17 26.55 27.20 Route 287, Route 17 Interchange Improvements BERGEN NJTPA Rank 31 6.97 16 85 12392 00000017__ 17 26.70 27.20 00000287__ 287 66.94 67.54 Route 17 from Route 287 Interchange to New York State Line BERGEN NJTPA New 6.97 17 32 97014A 00000195__ 195 6.20 7.00 00000095__ 95 14.93 15.40 Route 195, New Jersey Turnpike Interchange Improvements MERCER DVRPC Rank 32 6.95 18 44 10412 00000031__ 31 33.30 39.00 00000513__ CR 513 12.88 13.74 Route 31, North of I-78 to Asbury Rd, Operational Improvements HUNTERDON NJTPA Rank 44 6.92 19 41 09668 00000070__ 70 8.52 8.72 03000607__ CR 607 0.53 0.73 Route 70 at North Maple Ave.(CR 607) & Center Blvd. BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 41 6.87 20 33 04370 00000023__ 23 12.50 16.00 00000287__ 287 52.88 53.37 Route 23, Windbeam Road to Kiel Avenue, Operational Improvements MORRIS NJTPA Rank 33 6.81 21 80 12303 00000010__ 10 10.60 11.45 00000202__ 202 48.13 48.33 Route 10/202, NJ 53 to Johnson Road, Operational Improvements MORRIS NJTPA No rank 6.75 22 51 08352 00000078__ 78 14.50 16.50 00000173__ 173 11.18 11.70 Route 78, Ruppel's Road to Route 173, Highway Operational Improvements HUNTERDON NJTPA Rank 51 6.71 23 49 04330 00000287__ 287 6.20 6.60 12000665__ CR 665 0.85 1.09 Route 287, South Washington Avenue, Interchange Improvements (CR 665) MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 49 6.69 24 10 12307 00000038_ 38 7.43 7.69 03000607__ CR 607 4.94 5.14 Route 38, South Church Street Intersection to Fellowship Road Intersection BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 10 6.69 25 11 10410 00000088__ 88 5.00 10.00 00000549S1 CR 549 0.00 0.20 Route 88 Operational Improvements OCEAN NJTPA Rank 11 6.67 26 28 11403 00000078__ 78 58.00 58.50 00000001__ 1/9 (Express) 48.5 49.00 I-78 EB & US 1&9 NB ESSEX NJTPA Rank 28 6.43 27 46 99374 00000295__ 295 30.10 34.80 00000561__ CR 561 43.5 43.9 Route 295, Camden County Ramp Improvements, Copley Road to Marlton Pike CAMDEN DVRPC Rank 46 6.43 28 48 02331 00000009__ 9 27.50 28.90 05000602__ CR 602 0.63 0.83 Route 9, Church Road to Roosevelt Boulevard CAPE MAY SJTPO Rank 48 6.43 29 13 02407 00000070__ 70 53.93 54.13 00000528__ CR 528 34.44 34.64 Route 70, Cedar Bridge Road Intersection Improvements (CR 528) OCEAN NJTPA Rank 13 6.37 30 16 08404 00000046__ 46 42.80 43.15 00000053__ 53 4.46 4.66 Route 46, EB at Route 53 Ramp MORRIS NJTPA Rank 16 6.34 31 7 9113A 00000046__ 46 51.47 52.90 00000159__ 159 0.00 1.36 Route 46/159, Plymouth/Clinton Road Long-term improvements MORRIS NJTPA Rank 7 6.32 32 79 01320 00000206__ 206 57.13 57.33 Route 206, Cherry Valley Road Intersection Improvements MERCER DVRPC No rank 6.29 33 26 08333 00000202__ 202 19.01 20.94 18000637__ CR 637 0.20 0.40 Route 202, Holland Brook Road to Robbins Road SOMERSET NJTPA Rank 26 6.22 34 39 10414 00000202__ 202 17.73 21.99 18000637__ CR 397 0.20 0.40 Route 202 Corridor Operational & Safety Improvements SOMERSET NJTPA Rank 39 6.22 35 81 12332 00000202__ 202 20.30 20.50 Route 202, Old York Road (CR 637) Intersection Improvements SOMERSET NJTPA New 6.22 36 6 02385 00000042__ 42 0.00 3.51 00000322__ 322 24.43 25.72 Route 42/322, Tuckahoe Road (CR 555) to Main Street (CR 536) GLOUCESTER DVRPC Rank 6 6.22 37 5 08329 00000066__ 66 0.90 2.60 Route 66, West of Jumping Brook Road to East of Wayside Avenue MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 5 6.19 38 35 02402 00000130__ 130 82.20 82.40 Route 130, Raider Road, Intersection Improvements MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 35 6.15 39 83 12381 00000073__ 73 27.22 27.42 03000673__ CR 673 0.88 1.08 Route 73 & Fellowship Road (CR 673) Intersection Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC New 6.11 40 18 08422 00000027__ 27 12.00 12.21 12000608__ CR 608 0.00 0.20 Route 27, Cozzens Lane Intersection Improvements (CR 608) MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 18 6.02 41 29 07333 00000023__ 23 10.70 10.90 14000680__ CR 680 0.43 0.63 Route 23, Jackson Ave. (CR 680) Intersection Improvements MORRIS NJTPA Rank 29 5.95 42 38 07314 00000440__ 440 21.77 21.97 Route 440, Pulaski Street HUDSON NJTPA Rank 38 5.94 43 2013 Seq. Begin End Begin End MPO 2013 DBNUM SRI ROUTE SRI_2 ROUTE 2 Project Name County Old Rank Final ID MP MP MP 2 MP 2 Region Rank Score 66 10411 00000023__ 23 31.65 34.35 00000517__ CR 517 42.54 42.64 Route 23, Safety & Operational Improvements SUSSEX NJTPA Rank 66 5.91 44 73 09667 00000073__ 73 23.33 23.53 03000607__ CR 607 0.00 0.20 Route 73 at North Maple Ave.(CR 607) & Center Blvd. BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 73 5.85 45 82 12380 00000073__ 73 26.37 26.66 03000616__ CR 616 1.65 1.94 Route 73 & Church Road (CR 616) Intersection Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC New 5.83 46 34 99407 00000028__ 28 22.35 22.55 20000615__ CR 615 3.89 4.09 Route 28, Centennial Avenue UNION NJTPA Rank 34 5.77 47 36 02316 00000004__ 4 1.00 1.20 02000067__ CR 67 4.03 4.23 Route 4, Midland Avenue Intersection BERGEN NJTPA Rank 36 5.66 48 21 02315 00000009__ 9 33.29 34.11 01000665__ CR 665 0.00 0.20 Route 9, Pennsylvania Avenue to Chapman Boulevard ATLANTIC SJTPO Rank 21 5.61 49 57 09390 00000009__ 9 34.27 34.47 Route 9, Bethel Road Intersection Improvements ATLANTIC SJTPO Rank 57 5.61 50 59 10352 00000009__ 9 37.61 37.81 01000662__ CR 662 4.45 4.65 Rt. 9 & Mill Road, Intersection improvements ATLANTIC SJTPO Rank 59 5.59 51 70 10390 00000009__ 9 37.40 37.60 Rt 9 and Cedarbridge Rd., Intersection Improvements ATLANTIC SJTPO Rank 70 5.59 52 47 06306 00000009__ 9 133.90 134.25 00000184__ 184 0.24 0.44 Route 9, Route 184 (AKA West Pond Road) Interchange Improvements MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 47 5.59 53 24 00361 00000036__ 36 18.65 18.85 Route 36, Wilson Avenue MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 24 5.57 54 25 07317 00000001__ 1 21.28 21.48 Route 1, Aaron Road Operational Improvements MIDDLESEX NJTPA Rank 25 5.55 55 30 02323 00000047__ 47 68.00 69.18 00000041__ 41 0.00 0.20 Route 47, Five Points Intersection to Route 55 GLOUCESTER DVRPC Rank 30 5.55 56 64 10415 00000202__ 202 11.91 14.25 10000650__ CR 650 0.30 0.50 Route 202 Corridor Operational & Safety Improvements HUNTERDON NJTPA Rank 64 5.40 57 55 09666 00000073__ 73 25.25 25.45 Route 73 at Greentree Rd. (CR 674) *CR 674 Does NOT exist at Intersection BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 55 5.26 58 62 99410 00000295__ 295 64.50 64.95 00000535__ CR 535 2.45 2.65 Route 295, East State Street Extension MERCER DVRPC Rank 62 5.19 59 54 10416 00000022__ 22 3.56 3.76 00000519__ CR 519 28.23 28.43 Rt 22/Rt 519 (Uniontown Rd), Intersection Improvements WARREN NJTPA Rank 54 5.17 60 67 10353 00000130__ 130 42.05 42.25 03000626__ CR 626 1.73 1.93 Rt 130 at Mt. Holly Rd/Beverly-Rancocas Rd., Intersection Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 67 5.14 61 37 09303 00000129__ 129 0.98 1.18 11000650__ CR 650 0.16 0.36 Route 129, Lalor Street Intersection Improvements MERCER DVRPC Rank 37 5.13 62 60 07353 00000034__ 34 17.25 17.50 00000520__ CR 520 9.43 9.63 Route 34, Newman Springs Road (CR 520), Intersection Improvements MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 60 5.05 63 75 11310 00000029__ 29 18.62 18.82 Route 29,/165, Swan St. HUNTERDON NJTPA Rank 75 4.99 64 45 08451 00000130__ 130 40.70 41.00 03000613__ CR 613 3.61 3.82 Route 130, Bridgeboro Road Operational Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 45 4.98 65 50 06384 00000047__ 47 33.00 34.00 06000646__ CR 646 0.00 0.20 Route 47, Port Elizabeth CUMBERLAND SJTPO Rank 50 4.81 66 68 08325 00000033B_ 33B 0.92 1.12 Route 33 Bus., Wemrock Road Intersection Improvements MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 68 4.74 67 23 06304 00000130__ 130 28.27 28.47 00000168__ 168 9.62 9.82 Route 130, Route 168 Intersection Improvements CAMDEN DVRPC Rank 23 4.73 68 71 04380 00000033__ 33 34.77 35.27 00000034__ 34 8.76 8.96 Route 33/34, Eastbound U-turn facility MONMOUTH NJTPA Rank 71 4.61 69 56 09360 00000082__ 82 0.38 0.95 20000637__ CR 637 1.02 1.22 Rt 82 (Morris Ave) & Liberty Ave, Intersection Improvements UNION NJTPA Rank 56 4.52 70 63 07371 00000010__ 10 22.61 22.81 07000636__ CR 636 1.76 1.96 Route 10, Pleasant Valley Way (CR 636), Intersection Improvements ESSEX NJTPA Rank 63 4.22 71 77 06399 00000206__ 206 30.20 30.40 Route 206, Mansfield Township U-Turn BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 77 4.10 72 40 05360 00000054__ 54 7.48 7.68 00000073__ 73 2.30 2.50 Route 54, Blue Anchor Road, Intersection Improvements (CR 561) ATLANTIC SJTPO Rank 40 4.04 73 58 02338 00000094__ 94 26.30 26.50 Route 94, Valley View Road SUSSEX NJTPA Rank 58 3.97 74 72 01321 00000031__ 31 42.94 43.14 Route 31, Boulevard Intersection Improvements WARREN NJTPA Rank 72 3.94 75 53 99382 00000206__ 206 13.70 13.90 Route 206, Flyatt Road BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 53 3.81 76 65 06320 00000206__ 206 35.07 35.27 00000545__ CR 545 13.68 13.88 Route 206, Farnsworth Avenue/Georgetown Road, Intersection Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 65 3.67 77 84 12383 00000040__ 40 30.15 30.35 00000555__ CR 555 21.40 21.60 Route 40 & CR 555 Intersection, Operational & Safety Improvements GLOUCESTER DVRPC New 3.42 78 78 07348 00000202__ 202 34.52 34.72 Route 202, Douglass Ave. Intersection Improvements SOMERSET NJTPA Rank 78 3.29 79 74 08421 00000206__ 206 7.21 7.41 Route 206, Atsion Road Intersection Improvements BURLINGTON DVRPC Rank 74 3.25 80 42 04300 00000077__ 77 5.55 5.75 06000743__ CR 743 0.67 0.87 Route 77, Parsonage Road (CR 743) CUMBERLAND SJTPO Rank 42 3.19 81 61 00362M 00000029__ 29 22.45 23.10 00000519__ CR 519 0.00 0.20 Route 29, North of CR 523 to CR 519 HUNTERDON NJTPA Rank 61 2.62 82 76 06308 00000094__ 94 13.00 13.50 Route 94, Truck Climbing Lane WARREN NJTPA Rank 76 2.47 83 69 00313 00000130__ 130 5.90 6.10 17000642__ CR 642 0.00 0.20 Route 130, Penns Grove-Pedricktown Road SALEM SJTPO Rank 69 2.42 84 52 02384B 00000045__ 45 14.18 14.38 08000694__ CR 694 3.88 4.08 Route 45, Swedesboro-Monroeville Road (CR 694) GLOUCESTER DVRPC Rank 52 2.17 85 FY 2013 - 22 NEW JERSEY CONGESTION RELIEF PROGRAM PERFORMANCE ( How the 10 Year Capital Plan Addresses Congestion in New Jersey) Ü ?! 059B MORRIS 2 .!.! PASSAIC ?! 9044 31 059A.! ut206 .!.! .! rs23 rs284 .! .! .! 1 .! .! 9 W 93287 ?! .! ut rs94 BERGEN 14 .! .! ?! ! .! ?! . SUSSEX 9233B3 .! ?! ?! 28 rs94 .! rs15 06361 ut202 287 .! 10 rs17 PASSAIC ?! ?! rs181 .! ?! .! 93139 rs23 BERGEN ?! 9 ?! .! 208 ?! rs94 rs .! ?!?!?! ut9 W ?! ?! 059B ?! .! 206 .! ut 15 059A 93287 ESSEX ?! .! 9237 rs 2 .! 80 ?! 1 14 .! .! 16 t202 20 04305 .! ?! u rs?! .!.! 183 34 163 rs ?!. .! rs 80 !.!.!.! ?! .! .! . 4 .!sr62 .! .! rs ! 19 .! 46 ? ?!?! 80 rs 658B .! .! ?! ut 46 ?! .! .! MORRIS ut PIP 26 .! rs53 21 80 .! ) 10 .!.! ! 161 rs .!?! ?!rs ?! ?.! rs93 .! 159 rs ?! rs .! ?!46 ! 17 ut ? 67 ?!.! 97062B 23 rs .! rs ?! ut46 rs182 ?! rs .! 41 ?! rs3 rs5 ?! ut206 .! 120 63 ! 280 .! rs rs ? ?! 7 ?! HUDSON .! WARREN rs57 .! .! rs ?!rs17 .! .! ?! 287 rs10 9233B3 ?! .! 04305 31 ! ?! 95 ?! rs ? .! W ?!?! 28 ?!?! .! 34 .! 202 ?! .! .! 94047 ut 24 .! 7 .! rs 21 rs .!495 .! .! 124 rs 95 rs .! 12 ?!rs .! .! .! .! ESSEX .! .! ut1&9 .! .! ?! ?!.! .! HUDSON ?! rs139 ?! .! 1 .! .! 139 124 ?! utTRK .! .! .!.!rs .! .! .! rs U 94047 57 .! 78 12 rs 9137A 82 .! ut22 .! .! ut22 02372A 78 rs.!.! 20 439 .! .! ?! 38 ?! .! rs rs185 ?! 122 ?! ?! rs ?! SOMERSET 9169Q ?! ?! rs81 UNION rs173 .! .! 78 ?! .! 29 .! ?! ?! ?! 06318F 78 .! ?! rs59 ?! rs440 .! .! .! 278.! 06318F 27 .! rs28 rs27 .! ?!202 UNION.! ?! 27 ?! ?! ?! 287 *1206 ?! 02372B ut1&9 HUNTERDON 30 ut?!22 ?! Inset 'A' ?! ?!?! .! ?!?! ?! 08327A .! ?! 658B .! 23 rs31 ?! ?! ?! 26 ?!?! .! rs35 Inset 'A' ut202 .! 287 .! ?! .!.! ?! ut1 ?! .!.!rs184 27 .! rs440 rs18 rs .! 73 08327 rs12 ?! 780A rs ?!?! 93227C 18 32 ?! ?! ?! ?! 24 rs172 .! rs171 .! rs26 29 ut206 9169R rs?!91?!?! rs 35 90 21 ?! ut9 rs rs 780B X221C ?! rs36 403B 33 MIDDLESEX 22 .! 19 rs31 ?! ?! t202 ?! ?! u ut130 779 27 ?! ?! rs179 rs ?!rs18 ?! ?! ?! 17 rs165 ?! 676 ?! rs32 97071 ?! 11 ?! 30 ?! 06358 ?! t ?! 38 ?! ?! 34 u 64 79 rs .! rs .! 37 ut1 rs rs ?! .! ?! rs36 ut206 ?! ?! 95M ?! ?! BURLINGTON .! rs133 ?! ?! 295 355B 31 ?!?! 35 ?! rs 33 33 ?! ?! 1 rs rs 5 175 MERCER rsBUS rs18 rs ?!utBUS ?! ?! ?! ?! 355C 206 71 99312 ut S ut130 96040 rs 6 ?! MONMOUTH 33 ?! 29 33 rs 66 42 76 .! ?! ?!?! rs rs ?! 36 rs 154 33 ?! ?! ?! 70 ut1 95 ut9 rs ?! rs ?! rs129 ?! rs .! .! ! 41 rs156 . 168 206 195 rs .! ut 195 ?!138 rs ?! rs rs35 ?! .!?! ?! ?!?! ?! .! ?! rs71 CAMDEN N JT ?! PK EX ! T. ! 355A . ? 295 ?! 95 70 4 ?! rs68 ?!rs88 ?! rs rs35 ?!88 ?! rs413 ?! ?! rs ?! 076C rs13 15 ?! .!?! ?! 355D Inset 'B' ut130 7 ?! ?! ?! .! ?! 355E ?! rs73 GLOUCESTER ?! ?! 37 8 rs 35S ?! 355B 90 rs rs ?!?! 38 ?! 5 rs 47 ?!.! ?! .! ?! 70 42 676 ?! rs 9028 166 rs ! .! rs 37 ? rs ut30 38?! ?! rs 99312 .! ?!rs ?!.!?!.! 3 41 ?! ut206 rs35 rs 42 ?! ?! ?! 76 .! ?! 154 ?! ?! ?!?!rs ?! rs70 rs 41 ?! 168 ?! Inset 'B' .!rs .!rs .! ?! OCEAN 355D .! ?! BURLINGTON ?!.! 355C 7 ?! 72 ?! 6 rs ?! ?! ?! rs44 ?! ?! 295 ?! 324 47 ?! rs 355A rs ?!.!rs42 rs41 4 rs168 ?! 355E LEGEND rs45 ut322 ut130 8 47 CAMDEN Congested Places ?! rs ut9 rs73 ?! 295 rs48 ?! ?! 30 .! Problem Area Interchanges ?! rs42 ut 94071A rs140 13 55 rs 143 ?! ut40 rs77 rs rs72 High Need Intersections 97112B GLOUCESTER 25 ut322 Mainline Bottlenecks rs49 rs45 Congested Corridors SALEM ?!ut40 rs47 rs54 rs167 Congested Summer/Recreational Corridors 97049 43 ut30 FY13-22 Capital Plan Congestion Relief ?! ?! ut322 Project Type ?! ATLANTIC rs50 56 ?! rs ut40 Highway Operational Improvements ut9 ?!rs77 ?! ?!?! ?!?! ?! ?!?!?!?! Bottleneck Widenings ?!rs157 rs49 ?!?! rs87 Major Widenings ut30 CUMBERLAND rs55 rs187 Missing Links ut40

ITS rs47 2149F1 DBNUM rs152 rs49 35 RANK rs52 rs50 ut9 rs347

Output Level Performance Summary - FY 13-22 Capital Plan rs47

rs83 98543 40 "Congested Places" High Priority % of "Congested % of High Priority CAPE_MAY Locations within "Congested Places" Places" Locations "Congested Places" "Congested Places" High Priority "Congested Congested Places the FY13-22 Capital Locations within the within the FY13-22 Locations within the Locations Places" Locations Plan Project FY13-22 Capital Plan Capital Plan Project FY13-22 Capital Plan Sections Project Sections Sections Project Sections 02313 39 No. of Intersections 213 70 11 4 5% 6% 47 rs rs147 No. of Interchanges 99 29 5 5 5% 17% No. of Bottlenecks 17 5 1 1 6% 20%

ut9 rs162 NJDOT has identified 1,606 miles of Congested Corridors (Commuter and Recreational) on State Highways. rs109 7% of this road mileage occurs within the project limits of FY 13-22 Capital Plan project sections. These congested corridors create corridor delay of 501,078 hours per day. Miles The FY 13-22 Capital Plan project sections cover 8% of this delay. 03.5 7 14 21 28

Bureau of Commuter and Mobility Strategies New Jersey Department of Transportation February 2013