DOCSLIB.ORG

Wichita Transit Community Outreach Study Was Conducted with the Guidance, Support, and Participation of the Following People

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wichita Transit Community Outreach Study Was Conducted with the Guidance, Support, and Participation of the Following People This page intentionally left blank. ii Acknowledgements The Wichita Transit Community Outreach Services was funded through the City of Wichita and the Federal Transit Administration. The Wichita Transit Community Outreach Study was conducted with the guidance, support, and participation of the following people: Sanford Alexander Wichita Transit Advisory Board Richard Carlon Wichita Transit Advisory Board Jennifer Connelly Wichita Transit Advisory Board John Dandurand Wichita Transit Advisory Board Jeff Fluhr Wichita Transit Advisory Board Brad Gorsuch Wichita Transit Advisory Board Rev. Kevin Graham Wichita Transit Advisory Board Jim Gulick Wichita Transit Advisory Board George Harris Wichita Transit Advisory Board Irene Hart Wichita Transit Advisory Board Shirley Jefferson Wichita Transit Advisory Board Rebecca McNelly Wichita Transit Advisory Board Rosemary Niedens Wichita Transit Advisory Board Susan Robinson Wichita Transit Advisory Board William Robison Wichita Transit Advisory Board John Rolfe Wichita Transit Advisory Board Richard Schodorf Wichita Transit Advisory Board Ron Terzian Wichita Transit Advisory Board Steve Turkle Wichita Transit Advisory Board Shawn Walters Wichita Transit Advisory Board Rex Wilcox Wichita Transit Advisory Board Janet Miller Wichita City Council Lavonta Williams Wichita City Council Robert Layton Wichita City Manager Brent Holper WAMPO Michael Vinson Wichita Transit Steve Ainslie Wichita Transit Stan Zienkewicz Wichita Transit Michelle Stroot Wichita Transit iii Consultant Team Clyde Prem Olsson Associates Mark Swope Olsson Associates Tom Worker-Braddock Olsson Associates Triveece Harvey Patti Banks Associates (now Vireo) Karen Falk ETC Nathan Preheim MindMixer iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................... iii Consultant Team .......................................................................................................................................... iv Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... v Tables ......................................................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... viii 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Strategic Outreach ................................................................................................................................ 1 3 Phase I - Identify needs and desired characteristics ............................................................................. 2 4 Phase II - Developing Transit Service Alternatives ................................................................................ 5 5 Phase III - Validate Concepts and Develop Policy Action Plan ............................................................ 77 Appendix I Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 87 Appendix II – Data ..................................................................................................................................... 109 Figures Figure ES.1: Route Concept A Peak Service Frequencies ............................................................................. ix Figure ES.2: Route Concept B Peak Service Frequencies .............................................................................. x Figure ES.3: Route Concept C Peak Service Frequencies ............................................................................. xi Figure ES.4: Route Concept D - outlying community local fixed route extension ...................................... xii Figure ES.5: Route Concept D - outlying community commuter express service .......................................xiii Figure 4.1: Route Concept A ......................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4.2: Route Concept A - Peak Service Frequencies ............................................................................. 7 Figure 4.3: Route 1 ........................................................................................................................................ 8 Figure 4.4: Route 2 ........................................................................................................................................ 9 Figure 4.5: Route 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 4.6: Route 4 ...................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 4.7: Route 5 ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 4.8: Route 6 ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 4.9: Route 7 ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 4.10: Route 8 .................................................................................................................................... 15 Figure 4.11: Route 9 .................................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4.12: Route 10 .................................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 4.13: Route 11 .................................................................................................................................. 18 Figure 4.14: Route 12 .................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 4.15: Route 13 .................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4.16: Route 14 .................................................................................................................................. 21 v Figure 4.17: Route 15 .................................................................................................................................. 22 Figure 4.18: Route 16 .................................................................................................................................. 23 Figure 4.19: Route 17 .................................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 4.20: Northwest flex ........................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 4.21: Route Concept B ..................................................................................................................... 26 Figure 4.22: Route Concept B Peak Service Frequencies ............................................................................ 27 Figure 4.23: Route 1 .................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 4.24: Route 2 .................................................................................................................................... 29 Figure 4.25: Route 3 .................................................................................................................................... 30 Figure 4.26: Route 6 .................................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 4.27: Route 7 .................................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 4.28: Route 8 .................................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 4.29: Route 9 .................................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 4.30: Route 11 .................................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 4.31: Route 12 .................................................................................................................................. 36 Figure 4.32: Route 13 .................................................................................................................................. 37 Figure 4.33: Route 15 .................................................................................................................................. 38 Figure 4.34: Route 16 .................................................................................................................................. 39 Figure 4.35: Route 17 .................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322
    Process for Congestion Relief Link and Project Priority Ranking for CIS FY 1322 Congestion Management System (CMS) congestion link priority rankings were developed for all the links in the CMS. These link rankings serve two purposes. First is to rank the links so that priority can be established by location so that the highest priority congested locations can be identified. Second, for highway projects that have already been identified, they can be prioritized for congestion. The link rankings were developed using scores from “0” to “10” for each measure and the weighted by the percent for each measure to obtain a 100% score. A score of “10” was given for the highest priority values for each given measure used. The Congestion Relief priority rankings are primarily based on congestion performance measures, with consideration also given to related roadway usage characteristics. Congestion performance measures include volume to capacity (V/C) ratios and delays. Roadway usage characteristics include AADT traffic volumes, function class and strategic network. The congestion performance measures comprise 70% of the ranking while the roadway usage characteristics comprise the remaining 30%. As V/C ratios have been the most common performance measure used for congestion priority rankings, the V/C ratio scores were given 40% of the overall weight for the overall score, split evenly between AM and PM V/C ratios. The highest one‐way AM V/C was given 20% of the overall weight, while the highest one‐way PM V/C was also given 20% of the overall weight. Delays were given 30% of the overall weight, split by two types of delays.
    [Show full text]
  • Emission Station List by County for the Web
    Emission Station List By County for the Web Run Date: June 20, 2018 Run Time: 7:24:12 AM Type of test performed OIS County Station Status Station Name Station Address Phone Number Number OBD Tailpipe Visual Dynamometer ADAMS Active 194 Imports Inc B067 680 HANOVER PIKE , LITTLESTOWN PA 17340 717-359-7752 X ADAMS Active Bankerts Auto Service L311 3001 HANOVER PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-632-8464 X ADAMS Active Bankert'S Garage DB27 168 FERN DRIVE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-0420 X ADAMS Active Bell'S Auto Repair Llc DN71 2825 CARLISLE PIKE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-4752 X ADAMS Active Biglerville Tire & Auto 5260 301 E YORK ST , BIGLERVILLE PA 17307 -- ADAMS Active Chohany Auto Repr. Sales & Svc EJ73 2782 CARLISLE PIKE , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-479-5589 X 1489 CRANBERRY RD. , YORK SPRINGS PA ADAMS Active Clines Auto Worx Llc EQ02 717-321-4929 X 17372 611 MAIN STREET REAR , MCSHERRYSTOWN ADAMS Active Dodd'S Garage K149 717-637-1072 X PA 17344 ADAMS Active Gene Latta Ford Inc A809 1565 CARLISLE PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-633-1999 X ADAMS Active Greg'S Auto And Truck Repair X994 1935 E BERLIN ROAD , NEW OXFORD PA 17350 717-624-2926 X ADAMS Active Hanover Nissan EG08 75 W EISENHOWER DR , HANOVER PA 17331 717-637-1121 X ADAMS Active Hanover Toyota X536 RT 94-1830 CARLISLE PK , HANOVER PA 17331 717-633-1818 X ADAMS Active Lawrence Motors Inc N318 1726 CARLISLE PIKE , HANOVER PA 17331 717-637-6664 X 630 HOOVER SCHOOL RD , EAST BERLIN PA ADAMS Active Leas Garage 6722 717-259-0311 X 17316-9571 586 W KING STREET , ABBOTTSTOWN PA ADAMS Active
    [Show full text]
  • Download the 2019 State of Downtown Report
    Photo by 34thStateMedia.com 2019 STATE OF DOWNTOWN REPORT #1 BEST CITY #9 TOP CITIES FOR MANUFACTURING WORKERS WITH THE BEST WORK-LIFE BALANCE Kempler Industries SmartAsset.com DISCOVER #8 HOTTEST CITIES #3 CITY FOR YOUNG MILLENNIALS TO BUY HOMES FOR LOW STARTUP COSTS IN AMERICA Realtor.com SmartAsset.com 1 INTRO #1 GROWTH RATE #2 RECESSION-PROOF OF DIGITAL SERVICES JOBS CITIES IN THE UNITED STATES The Brookings Institution Livability.com WICHITA, KANSAS ONE OF THE KNOWN AS THE COOLEST CITIES AIR CAPITAL IN AMERICA OF THE WORLD Thrillist.com INTRO 2 2019 State of Downtown Highlights 4 4 4 $655 MILLION $85.2 MILLION 9:1 10 YEAR TOTAL 2018 PRIVATE INVESTMENT PRIVATE TO PUBLIC PRIVATE INVESTMENT 2018 INVESTMENT 4 4 15 $197 MILLION $9.3 MILLION $163 MILLION 10 YEAR TOTAL 2018 PUBLIC INVESTMENT 2018 RETAIL SALES PUBLIC INVESTMENT 7 7 7 7 513,984 SF 4.1 MILLION 89% TOTAL SQUARE FEET TOTAL SQUARE FEET OCCUPIED CLASS A OF RETAIL SPACE OF OFFICE SPACE OFFICE SPACE 17 17 2 1,228 350 2,749 RESIDENTIAL UNITS RESIDENTIAL UNITS ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL COMPLETED SINCE 2010 IN DEVELOPMENT POPULATION Photo by Mike Beauchamp 3 INTRO Downtown Wichita is the center of commerce and culture in the largest city in Kansas – offering vibrant cultural experiences, walkable amenities and endless activities. Downtown is home to dynamic companies who choose to be in the middle of the action. During my time with Westar Energy over the past 12 years I have witnessed downtown’s evolution firsthand and it has been an awesome experience! Much of that transformation began in 2010 with the adoption of Project Downtown: The Master Plan for Wichita.
    [Show full text]
  • Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’S Report (Final) July 2011
    Barrier system (from TOA) Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COUNTYWIDE BUS RAPID TRANSIT STUDY Consultant’s Report (Final) July 2011 Countywide Bus Rapid Transit Study Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. ES-1 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Key additional elements of BRT network ...................................................................... 2 1.1.1 Relationship to land use ........................................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Station access ...................................................................................................... 3 1.1.3 Brand identity ........................................................................................................ 4 1.2 Organization of report .................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................ 5 2 Study Methodology ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1 High-level roadway screening ...................................................................................... 9 2.2 Corridor development and initial
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Form 990 Public Disclosure Copy
    PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY 09190210 757970 67307 2019.05040 WICHITA COMMUNITY FOUNDAT 67307__1 TAX RETURN FILING INSTRUCTIONS FORM 990 FOR THE YEAR ENDING June 30, 2020 Prepared For: WICHITA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 301 N MAIN ST No. 100 WICHITA, KS 67202-4801 Prepared By: Regier Carr & Monroe, L.L.P. 300 W. Douglas Ave. Ste. 900 Wichita, KS 67202-2914 Amount Due or Refund: Not applicable Make Check Payable To: Not applicable Mail Tax Return and Check (if applicable) To: Not applicable Return Must be Mailed On or Before: Not applicable Special Instructions: This copy of the return is provided ONLY for Public Disclosure purposes. Any confidential information regarding large donors has been removed. ** PUBLIC DISCLOSURE COPY ** Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) (Rev. January 2020) | Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. 2019 Department of the Treasury Open to Public Internal Revenue Service | Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information. Inspection A For the 2019 calendar year, or tax year beginning JUL 1, 2019 and ending JUN 30, 2020 B Check if C Name of organization D Employer identification number applicable: Address change WICHITA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Name change Doing business as 48-1022361 Initial return Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Final return/ 301 N MAIN ST 100 316-264-4880 termin- ated City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code G Gross receipts $ 14,230,978.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 NBC World Series Dates Announced Riverfront Stadium to Host Six Days of Games and Promotions
    For Immediate Release: May 24, 2021 Contact Information: Kevin Jenks NBC Director [email protected] Greater Wichita Area Sports Commission 316.265.6236 or 970-449-2388 2021 NBC World Series Dates Announced Riverfront Stadium to host six days of games and promotions WICHITA, KANSAS - The Greater Wichita Area Sports Commission along with the Wichita Wind Surge announce the 87th NBC World Series, powered by Evergy will be played at Riverfront Stadium later this summer. The NBC World Series will be played August 4 -14, with Wichita hosting the last six days of the event, August 9-14. The first five days will be played in Hutchinson, KS at Hobart-Detter Field, August 4-8. “This is an exciting day for the NBC World Series. Returning to downtown Wichita and playing in Riverfront Stadium gives our teams an experience they’ll never forget,” said Kevin Jenks, NBC Tournament Director. “The Wind Surge understand the tradition of the NBC. Since they arrived in Wichita, their ownership and staff have expressed a desire to have the NBCWS play at Riverfront Stadium.” The NBC World Series was created in 1935 by local sporting goods salesman Raymond “Hap” Dumont. This year will mark the 87th anniversary for the annual tournament. “The NBC has been synonymous with Wichita since its inception in 1935. After a two-year absence, the tournament is returning to its roots: Downtown,” said Wind Surge CEO Jordan Kobritz. “We are pleased that the schedule allows a portion of the 2021 tournament to be played at Riverfront Stadium and we look forward to hosting the event for many years to come.” “The NBC World Series has the great fortune to play in front of our hometown fans in Wichita, along with the passionate following of fans in Hutchinson.
    [Show full text]
  • Q-Line Trolley
    Q‐Line Trolley Downtown Wichita, Kansas ************ * * * * * * * * ************ * * * * * * * * ************ * * * * * * * * NJOY THIS NOSTALGIC DOWNTOWN SHUTTLE SERVICE E FREE MONDAY - THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY 6 PM - 10 PM 6 PM - MIDNIGHT NOON—MIDNIGHT OU CAN CATCH THE Q LINE AT ANY INTERSECTION ALONG THE ROUTE Y ‐ . IT’S EASY TO FLAG IT DOWN. SIMPLY LOCATE THE TROLLEY AS IT APPROACHES, THEN WAVE. THE TROLLEY WILL PICK YOU UP QUICKLY AT THE NEAREST INTERSECTION. ONCE ON BOARD, YOU CAN STOP THE Q‐LINE AT ANY TIME BY PULLING THE CORD LOCATED NEAR THE WINDOWS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE TROLLEY. Q-Line service brought to you by: WaterWalk and it’s affiliates does not guarantee the accuracy of the information provided herein. Information was obtained through public resources. Information is subject to change without notice. For event and residential or commercial sales information please visit: wichitawaterwalk.com For updates and more information visit: downtownwichita.org Q-LINE STOPS Q-Line 1st & Mead 200 N. Mead Q Line B (clockwise) Friday & Saturday Pick up at :33 & :03 FREE Downtown Shuttle Service Century II 400 W. Douglas Q Line A (counterclockwise) Monday—Saturday Pick up at :14 & :44 Q Line B (clockwise) Friday & Saturday Pick up at :26 & :56 Exploration Place 300 N. McLean Blvd Q Line A (counterclockwise) Monday—Saturday Pick up at :19 & :49 Q Line B (clockwise) Friday & Saturday Pick up at :21 & :51 Hyatt Hotel 400 W. Waterman Q Line A (counterclockwise) Monday—Saturday Pick up at :26 & :56 Q Line B (clockwise) Friday & Saturday Pick up at :14 & :44 Intrust Bank Arena—North 600 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Operations and Financial Analysis
    OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS APRIL 22, 2015 PREPARED BY: LOUIS BERGER WATER SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS A) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B) OPERATIONS ANALYSIS C) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS D) APPENDICES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Louis Berger was tasked by the Baltimore City Department of Transportation (BCDOT) to evaluate the Charm City Circulator (CCC) bus operation and analyze financial performance, and develop route operations alternatives that maximize ridership while minimizing costs. Objective The objective is to develop and evaluate alternatives to eliminate the annual deficits while providing maximum service to riders within existing financial resources. Description of Current System Existing Condition The CCC consists of four routes, Purple, Orange, Green and Banner providing “Fast. Friendly. Free.” service throughout downtown Baltimore 362 days per year, with hours of service varying by day type and by season. Key characteristics of each route: Purple Route- runs north - south from Federal Hill to Historic Mount Vernon. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses to operate. Heaviest ridership of all the routes. Orange Route- runs east – west from Historic Fell’s Point and Harbor Point in the east beyond University of Maryland, Baltimore in the west. Ten (10) minute headways require five (5) buses to operate. Ridership is second best in the system. Green Route- roughly U shaped route serves Johns Hopkins University Hospital East Baltimore Campus (JHUH) connecting south to Harbor Point and Harbor East, then northwest to park and ride lots, looping down near City Center then back around. Ten (10) minute headways require six (6) buses. Longest route, least productive in terms of riders. Banner Route- angles southeast of the city past Federal Hill to Fort McHenry.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form I?
    NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10024-0018 Oct. 1990 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form I? This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. S« e ir1s1njciiQ^3>iHJ(ow/0 Complete tti&Natic nal Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A) Complete each item by rrt irking V iri ng the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-9000a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1 . Name of Property __ Historic name Wichita Historic Warehouse and Jobbers District Other name/site number Old Town 2. Location Bounded by the elevated railroad tracks, Douglas & Street & number Washington Avenues & Second Street________ D not for publication City or town Wichita________________ _ D vicinity State Kansas___Code KS Country Sedgwick___Code -4&3- * Zip code 67202 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this £3 nomination D request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property DO meets D does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • An Optimization Model to Investigate Transit Equity Between Original and Relocated Areas in Urban Revitalization Projects
    An Optimization Model to Investigate Transit Equity between Original and Relocated Areas in Urban Revitalization Projects Manoj K. Jha11 , Sabyasachee Mishra2, Diane Jones3, Coray Davis4 1 Center for Advanced Transportation and Infrastructure Engineering Research, Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, 1700 East Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251, United States 2 National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, United States 3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Morgan State University, 1700 East Cold Spring Lane Baltimore, MD 21251 4 Department of Engineering and Technology, Virginia State University, 1 Hayden Drive, Petersburg, VA 23806 submitted to the International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems 1 Corresponding author.: Tel.: +1 443 885 1446, fax.: +1 443 885 8218 E‐mail address: [email protected] (Manoj K. Jha), [email protected] (Sabyasachee Mishra), [email protected] (Diane Jones), [email protected] (Coray Davis) Jha et al. 2 ABSTRACT In urban revitalization projects, transit-captive populations are generally displaced from the inner urban core and moved out to outer-urban areas. Since such areas may not have the same level of transit service and availability, the displaced individuals often find it difficult to commute to the urban core for work resulting in forced auto dependency. While there has been growing awareness about transit oriented development in recent years, this inequity in transit service in the old and new areas should be addressed within the Environmental Justice (EJ) framework. In this paper we discuss the EJ issues resulting from displacement of low-income populations from inner urban core to outer-urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Historic Wichita! Booklet
    KEY: WICHITA REGISTER OF WRHP - HISTORIC PLACES REGISTER OF HISTORIC RHKP - KANSAS PLACES NATIONAL REGISTER OF NRHP - HISTORIC PLACES For more information contact: Historic Preservation Office Metropolitan Area Planning Department 10th Floor-City Hall 455 N. Main Wichita, Kansas 67202 (316) 268-4421 www.wichita.gov ind out more about Wichita’s history on the Discover Historic Wichita! guided F trolley tour. 316-352-4809 INTRODUCTION Discover Historic Wichita was first published in 1997. A second edition was printed in 2002 with a few minor changes. Since that printing, Wichita property owners have expressed a growing interest in listing their properties in the Register of Historic Kansas Places (RHKP) and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and many have been added. Also, a commercial area, the Warehouse and Jobbers District, was listed in 2003 and Wichita’s four historic districts were listed in the RHKP and NRHP in 2004. In this latest edition additional research was conduct- ed to ensure accuracy. The brochure is organized alphabetically by the name of the structure. The entries are also numbered to correspond with locations on the map found at the front of the brochure. An online publication of the Discover Historic Wichita brochure is updated as properties and/or his- toric districts are added to Wichita’s inventory of list- ed properties. The current version is on the Historic Preservation Office website at http://www.wichita. gov/Residents/History/. Biographical notes of relevant architects have been added to this brochure. Wichita’s periods of economic boom and bust brought these professionals to town to take advantage of building surges.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuter Rail Routes and Operating Plans
    Northeast Ohio Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Phase II Chapter 3: Commuter Rail Routes and Operating Plans 3.1 Commuter Rail Service Assumptions 3.2 Rail Network Characteristics 3.3 Description of Each Route 3.4 Access to Downtown Cleveland 3.5 Access to Downtown Akron PARSONS Final Report BRINCKERHOFF December 2001 Northeast Ohio Commuter Rail Feasibility Study Phase II CHAPTER 3: TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1 COMMUTER RAIL SERVICE ASSUMPTIONS................................................................................ 3 3.1.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS ................................................................................................... 3 Level of Service (LOS) 1– Minimum service with no reverse-peak .......................................................... 3 Level of Service (LOS) 2– Basic service with limited reverse-peak.......................................................... 4 Level of Service (LOS) 3 – Basic service with full reverse-peak............................................................... 4 3.1.2 TRAINSET REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................ 5 3.2 RAIL NETWORK CHARACTERISTICS............................................................................................ 6 3.2.1 RIGHT OF WAY OWNERSHIP.......................................................................................................... 6 3.2.2 RAIL FREIGHT TRAFFIC ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]