Perversion for Profit : the Politics of Pornography And

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Perversion for Profit : the Politics of Pornography And STRUB Praise for ALTHOUGH AMERICA IS NOT ALONE IN ITS ambivalence toward sex and its depictions, the prefer - ences of the nation swing sharply between toleration and censure. This pattern has grown even more pronounced PERVERSION WHITNEY STRUB since the 1960s, with the emergence of the New Right and its attack on the “floodtide of filth” that was supposedly PERVERSION PERVERSION FOR sweeping the nation. Antipornography campaigns became the New Right’s political capital in the 1960s, laying the groundwork for the “family values” agenda that shifted the country to the right. PROFIT Perversion for Profit traces the anatomy of this trend and PERVERSION the crucial function of pornography in constructing the New Right’s agenda, which has emphasized social issues. “This study of the politics of pornography in postwar America is marvelous. Paying close attention to both visual FOR Whitney Strub vividly re-creates the debates over obscen- and textual sources, Whitney Strub brings them alive for the reader. His genealogy of outrage from comic books ity that consumed members of the ACLU in the 1950s and to pornography is utterly original. The book is convincingly and responsibly opinionated and full of life. The revisits the deployment of obscenity charges against pur - chapter on feminism and pornography is a masterpiece. It is a landmark chapter, one of the few historical veyors of gay erotica during the cold war, revealing the essays that might achieve that rare accomplishment of actually ending a sterile debate.” differing standards applied to heterosexual and homo- FOR rick perlstein, author of nixonland: the rise of a president and sexual pornography. He follows the rise of the influential the fracturing of america and before the storm: barry goldwater and PROFIT Citizens for Decent Literature during the 1960s and the the unmaking of the american consensus PROFIT pivotal events that followed: the sexual revolution, femi - nist activism, the rise of the gay rights movement, the “This is a very impressive book. It is extraordinarily comprehensive, offering excellent discussions of both The Politics of “porno chic” moment of the early 1970s, and resurgent national political debates and outcomes and local manifestations. Ranging from Los Angeles and Memphis to La Christian conservatism, which now shapes public policy Crosse, Wisconsin, and numerous small towns, Whitney Strub has done an admirable job of situating his analysis far beyond the issue of sexual decency. in the local arenas where obscenity and pornography battles frequently take place. My impression is that Strub Pornography Strub also examines the ways in which the left failed to consulted every imaginable archive while completing this project, and his main argument is persuasive and mount a serious or sustained counterattack to the New WHITNEY STRUB is an assistant professor of very important. It fills an important gap in the literature and will make an original and significant contribution Right’s use of pornography as a political tool. As he dem - history at Rutgers University, Newark. His writing has and the Rise of the to the histories of pornography, obscenity, sexuality, postwar politics, and postwar culture.” onstrates, this failure put the Democratic Party at the appeared in American Quarterly, Journal of the History of andrea friedman, washington university in st. louis, author of prurient mercy of Republican rhetoric. In placing debates about Sexuality, Journal of Social History, PopMatters, and Bad interests: gender, democracy, and obscenity in new york city, 1909–1945 New Right pornography at the forefront of American postwar his - Subjects. He lives in Center City, Philadelphia. tory, Strub revolutionizes our understanding of sex and American politics. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS / NEW YORK ISBN: 978-0-231-14886-3 cover design: martin hinze www.cup.columbia.edu 9 780231 148863 cover image: ap images/ dave pickoff Printed in the U.S.A. COLUMBIA PERVERSION FOR PROFIT C5318.indb i 8/19/10 10:09 AM C5318.indb ii 8/19/10 10:09 AM WHITNEY STRUB PERVERSION FOR PROFIT The Politics of Pornography and the Rise of the New Right Columbia University Press C5318.indb iii 8/19/10 10:09 AM A portion of chapter 1 was published in American Quarterly (2008), and sections of chapters 3 and 4 appeared in the Journal of the History of Sexuality (2006). columbia university press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 2010 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Strub, Whitney. Perversion for profi t : the politics of pornography and the rise of the New Right / Whitney Strub. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 978-0-231-14886-3 (cloth : alk. paper) — isbn 978-0-231-52015-7 (ebook) 1. Pornography—United States—History—20th century. 2. Pornography—Political aspects—United States. 3. Conservatism—United States I. Title. hq472.u6s77 2010 363.4′70973—dc22 2010025009 Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Th is book is printed on paper with recycled content. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 References to Internet Web sites (URLs) were accurate at the time of writing. Neither the author nor Columbia University Press is responsible for URLs that may have expired or changed since the manuscript was prepared. C5318.indb iv 8/19/10 10:09 AM Contents Introduction 1 1. The Rediscovery of Pornography Emergence of a Cold War Moral Panic 11 2. Ambivalent Liberals Th eorizing Obscenity Under Consensus Constraints 43 3. Arousing the Public Citizens for Decent Literature and the Emergence of the Modern Antiporn Movement 80 4. Damning the Floodtide of Filth Th e Rise of the New Right and the Political Capital of Moralism 116 5. The Permissive Society Porno Chic and the Cultural Aftermath of the Sexual Revolution 146 6. Resurrecting Moralism Th e Christian Right and the Porn Debate 179 7. Pornography Is the Practice, Where Is the Theory? Second-Wave Feminist Encounters with Porn 213 8. Vanilla Hegemony Policing Sexual Boundaries in the Permanent Culture-War Economy 256 Notes 299 Acknowledgments 363 Index 367 C5318.indb v 8/19/10 10:09 AM C5318.indb vi 8/19/10 10:09 AM PERVERSION FOR PROFIT C5318.indb vii 8/19/10 10:09 AM C5318.indb viii 8/19/10 10:09 AM INTRODUCTION pornography has generated at least as many words as it has orgasms, and the words have arguably been more intense. From the breath- less denunciations of Anthony Comstock and Andrea Dworkin to the equally spirited defenses of Annie Sprinkle and Patrick Califi a, pornogra- phy is a topic guaranteed to inspire heated passions. Th ose passions have aff ected American politics in profound ways in the past half-century, helping shape the public face of the conservative as- cendance that constitutes the most important national political movement of the era. Yet for all that has been written on matters of porn and its legal complement, obscenity, the full history of the social, cultural, and sexual contestations that have structured the modern politics of pornography and obscenity remains unwritten. Nothing comparable to Andrea Fried- man’s excellent Prurient Interests , which situates obscenity battles of early- twentieth-century New York City in local gender and political confl icts, has been undertaken for the postwar United States. Many of the most im- portant works on recent porn-related struggles have been polemical rather than scholarly in nature, and outstanding scholarly eff orts often hone in on highly specifi c topics, such as Donald Alexander Downs’s Th e New Politics of Pornography , which examines 1980s battles in Minneapolis and Indianapolis. 1 In Perversion for Profi t I seek to write the larger national history of postwar American struggles over pornography and obscenity. Particular emphasis falls on the discovery and deployment of the political capital of moralism by the burgeoning New Right in the late 1960s. While the post- war liberal consensus that shaped the American mainstream in the 1950s popularized opposition to censorship, liberals hesitated to follow their free- speech convictions to their logical corollaries and instead allowed a First Amendment exception to be made for “obscenity,” a class of material de- fi ned as “utterly without redeeming social value.” Th ough the fundamental intellectual incoherence of the liberal position remained successfully ob- C5318.indb 1 8/19/10 10:09 AM 2 • introduction scured for several years, new rhetorical strategies allowing conservatives to frame repressive policies as secular and reasonable put liberals in an unten- able position regarding pornography by the 1960s. Unwillingly, they ceded social authority on the matter to the nascent New Right. Th e Right’s commitment to suppressing porn began as a nominal one. Conservative politicians displayed more interest in attracting voters with pronouncements of their piety than in following through with substantive policy, damning rather than damming the “fl oodtide of fi lth” allegedly en- gulfi ng the nation, and eagerly adopting moralism as a discursive displace- ment of the increasingly obsolete conservative tropes of racism and anti- communism. But as the 1970s witnessed the surprising political awakening of evangelical Christians, sexual politics quickly became a key conservative platform item in assuring that those new voters fl ocked en masse to the Re- publican Party. Th e result was a startling new level of government obeisance to normative evangelical sexuality, seen in the Reagan administration’s Meese Commission and, most recently, in the overtly religious rhetoric and policies of the George W. Bush years. Pornography played dual roles in this trajectory from liberal to con- servative national politics, both as an indicator of social and political trends in the treatment it received and as a causal agent in alerting the New Right to the tremendous political capital of moralism and sanctimony.
Recommended publications
  • Congress - New Members” of the Robert T
    The original documents are located in Box 10, folder “Congress - New Members” of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Some items in this folder were not digitized because it contains copyrighted materials. Please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library for access to these materials. Digitized from Box 10 of the Robert T. Hartmann Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library .., SENATE I RepuL~ans · Garn, E. J. Utah Laxalt, Paul Nevada Democrats Bumpers, Dale Arkansas Culver, John C. Iowa Ford, Wendell Kentucky Glenn, John H. Ohio Hart, Gary W. Colorado Leahy, Patrick J. Vermont Morgan, Robert B. North Carolina Stone, Richard Florida The New Hampshire race has not been decided. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (REPUBLICANS) David F. Emery Maine Millicent Fenwick New Jersey William F. Goodling Pennsylvania Bill Gradison Ohio Charles E. Grassley Iowa Tom Hagedorn Minnesota George V. Hansen Idaho . Henry J. Hyde Illinois James M.
    [Show full text]
  • 19-04-HR Haldeman Political File
    Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 19 4 Campaign Other Document From: Harry S. Dent RE: Profiles on each state regarding the primary results for elections. 71 pgs. Monday, March 21, 2011 Page 1 of 1 - Democratic Primary - May 5 111E Y~'ilIIE HUUSE GOP Convention - July 17 Primary Results -- --~ -~ ------- NAME party anncd fiJ cd bi.lc!<ground GOVERNORIS RACE George Wallace D 2/26 x beat inc Albert Brewer in runoff ­ former Gov.; 68 PRES cando A. C. Shelton IND 6/6 former St. Sen. Dr. Peter Ca:;;hin NDPA endorsed by the Negro Democratic party in Aiabama NO SENATE RACE CONGRESSIONAL 1st - Jack Edwards INC R x x B. H. Mathis D x x 2nd - B ill Dickenson INC R x x A Ibert Winfield D x x 3rd -G eorge Andrews INC D x x 4th - Bi11 Nichols INC D x x . G len Andrews R 5th -W alter Flowers INC D x x 6th - John Buchanan INC R x x Jack Schmarkey D x x defeated T ito Howard in primary 7th - To m Bevill INC D x x defeated M rs. Frank Stewart in prim 8th - Bob Jones INC D x x ALASKA Filing Date - June 1 Primary - August 25 Primary Re sults NAME party anned filed bacl,ground GOVERNOR1S RACE Keith Miller INC R 4/22 appt to fill Hickel term William Egan D former . Governor SENATE RACE Theodore Stevens INC R 3/21 appt to fill Bartlett term St.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 146 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 No. 28 Senate The Senate was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Monday, March 20, 2000, at 12 noon. House of Representatives TUESDAY, MARCH 14, 2000 The House met at 12:30 p.m. The Iowa State Men at the beginning package of a minimum wage increase f of the season some people even rated and tax reductions. them as being at the bottom of the Big The resistance on the part of the Re- MORNING HOUR DEBATES 12 this year. In fact, they came through publican leadership to a fairly small The SPEAKER. Pursuant to the with an outstanding phenomenon per- minimum wage increase in the midst of order of the House of January 19, 1999, formance and not only won, as I said the greatest prosperity we have ever the Chair will now recognize Members before, the regular season but won the known speaks a great deal to a social from lists submitted by the majority tournament; and I want to congratu- insensitivity, but equally distressing to and minority leaders for morning hour late Marcus Fizer as the Most Valuable me is their decision that we should debates. The Chair will alternate rec- Player. begin to reduce one of the most pro- ognition between the parties, with each This is a great thing that is hap- gressive taxes in America. And, of party limited to not to exceed 30 min- pening in Iowa.
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Highway Historic and Cultural Resources Arlington County, Virginia
    LEE HIGHWAY HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Prepared for: Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700, Arlington, VA 22201 Prepared by: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 3101 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 900 Arlington, Virginia 22201 Principal Author: Geoffrey Henry, M.A. Principal Investigators: Mark Edwards, M.S. Geoffrey Henry, M.A. Rebecca McGovern, B.A. Kisa Hooks, M.A. John Southern, M.A. August 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On behalf of the Arlington County Department of Community Planning, Housing & Development (CPHD), AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) of Arlington County, Virginia conducted a cultural resources survey of Lee Highway (US Route 29), in Arlington County, between January 2019 and February 2020. The Lee Highway Cultural Resources Survey is a component of the larger “Plan Lee Highway” project, a long-range plan and comprehensive vision for the Lee Highway corridor conducted by AECOM for the CPHD. The Lee Highway Cultural Resources Survey consisted of the following tasks: 1) Meetings; 2) Background Research; 3) Field Investigation; and 4) Report of Findings. The survey was conducted by AECOM’s Secretary of the Interior (SOI)-qualified architectural historians, who attended numerous in- person and telephone meetings with CPHD staff as well as three public meetings, and submitted weekly progress reports to the CPHD during the field work phase. Working with both CPHD staff and the general public, AECOM developed a list of 120 resources (buildings, structures, objects, and sites) within the Plan Lee Highway study area to be researched, surveyed, and documented either at the reconnaissance level (105) or in-depth level (15).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Reprint
    2007 SESSION INTRODUCED REPRINT 079204260 INTRODUCED 1 HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 777 2 Offered January 19, 2007 3 Celebrating the life of Joel Thomas Broyhill. 4 ±±±±±±±±±± Patrons±±Callahan, Abbitt, Albo, Amundson, Brink, Bulova, Caputo, Ebbin, Eisenberg, Englin, Howell, W.J., Hugo, Hull, Marsden, Moran, Plum, Poisson, Rust, Scott, J.M., Sickles and Watts; Senators: Cuccinelli, Devolites Davis, Herring, Howell, O©Brien, Puller, Saslaw, Ticer and Whipple 5 ±±±±±±±±±± 6 WHEREAS, Joel Thomas Broyhill, respected businessman and United States Congressman from 1953 7 to 1974, representing Virginia©s 10th District in Northern Virginia, died on September 24, 2006; and 8 WHEREAS, a native of Hopewell, Joel Broyhill moved to Arlington in 1937 when his family 9 relocated their building and real estate firm, M.T. Broyhill & Sons, to Northern Virginia; and 10 WHEREAS, Joel Broyhill graduated from George Washington University in 1941, enlisted in the 11 United States Army in 1942, and served in the European Theater as a captain in the 106 Infantry 12 Division during World War II; and 13 WHEREAS, at the Battle of the Bulge, Joel Broyhill was captured by the Germans, but after months 14 of captivity, he managed to escape a prisoner-of-war camp to join advancing United States forces; and 15 WHEREAS, Joel Broyhill was released from active duty on November 1, 1945, and was awarded the 16 Bronze Star; he returned home to work as general manager in his family©s real estate firm; and 17 WHEREAS, after the war, Joel Broyhill soon became actively involved
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Strategies James R
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Faculty Publications History 1998 Southern Strategies James R. Sweeney Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs Part of the American Politics Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Sweeney, James R., "Southern Strategies" (1998). History Faculty Publications. 10. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_fac_pubs/10 Original Publication Citation Sweeney, J. R. (1998). Southern strategies. Virginia Magazine of History and Biography, 106(2), 165-200. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOUTHERN STRATEGIES The 1970 Election for the United States Senate in Virginia by James R. Sweeney* While feminists marched in protest outside the Statler Hilton on the evening of 14 March 1970, President Richard M. Nixon, Vice-President Spiro T. Agnew, and Virginia's senior senator, Harry F. Byrd, Jr., attended the men-only annual banquet of the exclusive Gridiron Club, a group of fifty of Washington's most prominent male newspaper correspondents. The 500 guests enjoyed an evening of off-the-record speeches, satirical musical skits, and quite unexpected piano duets by Nixon and Agnew that "stole the show." As he was leaving, the president stopped at Senator Byrd's table and said, "Harry, I think it's about time for us to discuss Okinawa." Those who overheard assumed that Nixon was referring to the administration's plan to give the island of Okinawa back to Japan, a proposal that Byrd opposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Metro Revolt
    The D.C. Freeway Revolt and the Coming of Metro Part 8 The Metro Revolt Table of Contents Advancing Metro ............................................................................................................................ 2 The Volpe Plan ............................................................................................................................... 5 The I-66 Problem in Virginia ........................................................................................................ 11 The New Delegate ......................................................................................................................... 20 Metro Funds .................................................................................................................................. 23 Three Sisters Bridge Design ......................................................................................................... 25 Fighting for Metro ......................................................................................................................... 26 Chairman Natcher Makes His Point ............................................................................................. 31 On the Eve of Revolt ..................................................................................................................... 37 Day of the Revolt .......................................................................................................................... 40 After the Revolution ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eighty-Seventh Congress January 3, 1961, to January 3, 1963
    EIGHTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS JANUARY 3, 1961, TO JANUARY 3, 1963 FIRST SESSION-January 3, 1961, to September 27, 1961 SECOND SESSION-January 10, 1962,1 to October 13, 1962 VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES-RICHARD M. NIXON,2 of California;LYNDON B. JOHNSON,2 of Texas PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE-CARL HAYDEN, of Arizona SECRETARY OF THE SENATE-FELTON MCLELLAN JOHNSTON, of Mississippi SERGEANT AT ARMS OF THE SENATE-JOSEPH C. DUKE, of Arizona SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-SAM RAYBURN,4of Texas; JOHN W. MCCORMACK,5 of Massachusetts CLERK OF THE HOUSE-RALPH R. ROBERTS,6 of Indiana SERGEANT OF ARMS OF THE HOUSE-ZEAKE W. JOHNSON, JR.,6 ofTennessee DOORKEEPER OF THE HOUSE-WILLIAM M. MILLER,6 of Mississippi POSTMASTER OF THE HOUSE-H. H. MORRIS,6 of Kentucky ALABAMA Barry M. Goldwater, Phoenix John E. Moss, Jr., Sacramento SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES William S. Mailliard, San Francisco Lister Hill, Montgomery John J. Rhodes, Mesa John F. Shelley, San Francisco John J. Sparkman, Huntsville Stewart L. Udall,' Tucson John F. Baldwin, Martinez Morris K. Udall,8 Tucson Jeffery Cohelan, Berkeley REPRESENTATIVES George P. Miller, Alameda Frank W. Boykin, Mobile ARKANSAS J. Arthur Younger, San Mateo George M. Grant, Troy Charles S. Gubser, Gilroy George W. Andrews, Union Springs SENATORS John J. McFall, Manteca Kenneth A. Roberts, Anniston John L. McClellan, Camden Bernice F. Sisk, Fresno Albert Rains, Gadeden J. William Fulbright, Fayetteville Charles M. Teague, Ojai Armistead I. Selden, Jr., Greensboro REPRESENTATIVES Harlan F. Hagen, Hanford Carl A. Elliott, Jasper Ezekiel C. Gathings, West Memphis Gordon L.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: U.S
    APPENDIX A: U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS ON PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of Amer- ica. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. Article II, Section 1, Clause 3 The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Per- sons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with them- selves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representa- tives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Major- ity, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington House Historic District [2013 Boundary Increase & Additional Documentation] Other Names/Site Number: Arlington House, the Robert E
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Arlington House Historic District [2013 Boundary Increase & Additional Documentation] Other names/site number: Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial (National Park); Mount Washington; Custis-Lee Mansion; Lee Mansion; Arlington National Cemetery Headquarters (VDHR# 000-0001; 44AR0017; 44AR0032) Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: _Roughly bounded by Sheridan Dr., Ord & Weitzel Dr., Humphreys Drive & Lee Avenue in Arlington National Cemetery City or town: Arlington State: VA County: Arlington Not For Publication: Vicinity: ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTENSIONS of REMARKS November 30, 1970 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS
    39194 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS November 30, 1970 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS OPERATION CORNERSTONE to 80 percent) of its time in community to find a glass or dish, if you require such organization, similar to the Office of Eco­ niceties. If you're tired, you may be able nomic Opportunity's Community Action Pro­ to talk your way into flopping for a while on HON. JOHN R. RARICK gram-type activities. We came away with the one of the bunk beds covered by mattresses feeling that the participant portion of the which resemble WWI Red Cross litters. OF LOUISIANA project is primarily a device invented to pro­ Randy Reynalds, a likable nineteen-year­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES vide an economic base for the community old drop-out, flopped down six months ago, Wednesday, November 25,1970 organization acti vities. These activities, ac­ and is still around. Now a Cornerstone staft' cording to our observation, have t aken the member, he receives room and board for Mr. RARICK. Mr. Speaker, Corner­ form of non-constructive attacks on local, varied chores such as carrying out garbage, stone, HUD's controversial training pro­ st ate, and Federal programs and/ or agencles painting the house, or acting as guide for gram in Atlanta, Ga., is a classic dis­ operating in the neighborhood. The key participants who come to the Project from question which we feel you should be alerted various Federal agencies. grace in waste and wanton misdirection to is: Does the Department of Housing and of taxpayer's dollars under the excuse Urban Development wish to subsidize a HUNDREDS OF VOLUNTEERS of helping poor and unfortunate.
    [Show full text]