The Athenian Βαζηιεύο to 323

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Athenian Βαζηιεύο to 323 The Athenian Βαζηιεύο to 323 BCE —Myth and Reality Kevin James O‘Toole B.Ec., Dip.Ed., B.Sc., LL.B. Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Western Australia School of Humanities Discipline Group of Classics and Ancient History 2012 The Athenian Βαζηιεύο to 323 BCE —Myth and Reality Kevin James O‘Toole ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I gratefully acknowledge the always generous, good-humoured and pertinent advice to me throughout the present project of Professor John Melville-Jones. I also gratefully acknowledge the advice and encouragement of Dr Lara O‘Sullivan. I take the opportunity also to express my appreciation of the Reid Library at the University of Western Australia in particular for giving me efficient access to the world‘s libraries through its inter-library service. K. J. O‘Toole For Helen and for our children Nicholas, Dominic and Stephanie 3 ABSTRACT The recent more critical analysis of the ancient sources that has led to broad acceptance by modern scholars that there was no ancestral monarchy in geometric Athens of a type comparable to monarchies to the contemporaneous east and south-east of the Aegean, needs also to be applied to the traditional account of the office of the annual Athenian βαζηιεύο. The absence of ancestral monarchy itself calls for a review of the traditional account of the origins of the office of the annual Athenian βαζηιεύο, based as it is on a genesis from such a monarchy. The notion that the βαζηιεύο was ―the successor of the Bronze Age kings‖ is not sustained by a review of such Bronze Age evidence that there is. Similarly the notion that the βαζηιεύο was a ―pre-eminent religious authority‖ in Demosthenic Athens, or even the individual in Athens ―who had the highest responsibility in religious affairs‖, is not sustainable on a close and critical review of the ancient sources. Moreover, such a review of the ancient sources, including the Athenaion Politeia, leads to the conclusion that we do not have an adequate grasp of when the office was instituted, what the constitutional status of the annual βαζηιεύο was, or what the office actually did. This review, combined with the results of other modern investigations, suggests that it is possible that the office was not instituted before the end of the 6th century BCE. Furthermore, a review of the modern scholarship, where it relies on the traditional account of the office, reveals that the office has been, and continues to be, widely and inappropriately used as an argument of last resort, for instance: ‗as the βαζηιεύο was in charge of all torch races the event was ancient and sacral in nature‘. In such cases the office of βαζηιεύο becomes a trope in the form of a device used presumptively and uncritically to date and to characterize where no other means are to hand, and when prudence calls for restraint. There is a need to curb hyperbole and fantasy in references to the office, lest sight of reality is lost by means of repetition of myth. December 2011 4 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER ONE—The Notion of an Athenian yZn (wanax) 25 CHAPTER TWO—Athens‘ Ancestral Βαζηιεύο 61 CHAPTER THREE—὇η Πάηξηνη and the Athenian Βαζηιεύο 99 CHAPTER FOUR— From Kreōn to Onēsippos – Part One: The Nine Archons 135 CHAPTER FIVE—From Kreōn to Onēsippos – Part Two: The Socio-Economic Context 171 CHAPTER SIX—The Demosthenic Βαζηιεύο 217 CHAPTER SEVEN—Conspectus 269 BIBLIOGRAPHY OF WORKS CITED 277 INDEXES: Greek Words and Phrases 323 Epigraphy 327 Ancient Authors 329 General 337 5 INTRODUCTION CONTENTS A The Aim of the Present Work 6 B Previous Studies 6 (a) Hauvette-Besnault and Carlier 6 (b) The Mechanism for the Origin of the Office of the Βαζηιεύο 7 (c) Comparison with the Roman Office of Rex Sacrorum 9 (d) Comparing the Overthrow of Monarchy in Rome and Athens 10 (e) The Bαζηιεύο and the Rex – An Historiographical Feedback Loop 11 (f) The Perception of the Office as in Origin a ‗Religious‘ Office 12 C The Literary Sources 13 (a) Homer and Hesiod 14 (b) The Athenaion Politeia 15 (c) The Forensic Speeches 17 (d) Herodotus and Thucydides 18 D Archaeology and Anthropology 18 E Words and Definition 19 F Historiographical Reasoning 20 (a) Abductive Argument 20 (b) The Argument from Silence 22 G Plan of the Work 22 Form of Names: Throughout this work names are, in general, rendered in original or transliterated Greek, save for names of ancient authors and their works, which are rendered in their most common, usually Romanized, form. Linear B Font: The Linear B font used in this work is by courtesy, gratefully acknowledged, of Curtis Clark, California State Polytechnic University. The characters are of course stylized and cannot indicate the form variations in the original sources. 6 INTRODUCTION A The Aim of the Present Work It is the aim of the present work to review what is known of the office of Athenian βαζηιεύο by reference to its historical, religious and constitutional contexts, and to appraise critically the portrayal of the office and its incumbents in ancient and modern scholarship.1 B Previous Studies (a) Hauvette-Besnault and Carlier The first substantial modern study of the Athenian βαζηιεύο was the 1884 doctoral thesis of Amédée Hauvette-Besnault De Archonte Rege.2 That was followed a century later by Pierre Carlier‘s La Royauté Athénienne, a chapter in his monumental La Royauté en Grèce avant Alexandre.3 Pierre Carlier described the genesis of the βαζηιεύο within the broader context of the collapse of an ancient Athenian monarchy: ―Le sens général de l‘évolution politique athénienne du haut archaïsme est tout à fait clair. On retrouve à Athènes les mêmes phénomènes que dans la plupart des cités grecques. 1) La royauté a été divisée en plusieurs magistratures. 2) La durée des fonctions politiques a été considérablement réduite: on est passé d'une royauté viagère à des magistratures annuelles. 3) L'accès au pouvoir a été élargi: on est passé d‘une monarchie héréditaire à des magistratures accessibles à tous les Eupatrides.‖ 4 1 In respect of the ancient literature in regard to Athens it is not always clear if ‗βαζηιεύο‘ is referring to a monarch or to the annual official (or, in at least one instance, perhaps both). The absence of the definite article can be an indicator that ‗βαζηιεύο‘ is referring to a monarch, but that is not always the case. The problem arises in a variety of contexts: see for instance p. 85 note 374 regarding a use by Plato; p. 164 note 727 a reference by Eratosthenes; pp. 152-156 re. Drakōn‘s Law; and pp. 258-259 in regard to Agora XVI 72. 2 Hauvette-Besnault (1884). 3 Carlier (1984). 4 Carlier (1984) 371. cf. Lenz (1993) 265, referring to officials called βαζηιεύο in Athens and elsewhere in Greece: ―How can one explain the various officials called βασιλεύρ except as vestigial survivals?‖ 7 In 1993 Pedro Barceló, in the course of applying some 200 words to the Athenian βαζηιεύο, echoed what had become a common characterization of the βαζηιεύο as a sort of high priest of Athens: ―Wenn wir Aristoteles folgen, so entwickelte sich aus der einstigen Machtfülle des Königs das Archontat (drei Beamte sowie sechs Thesmotheten für die Rechtsprechung) als Exekutivbehörde, daneben fungierten der Polemarchos als Truppenbefehlshaber und der als βασιλεύρ gekennzeichnete Archon als Oberpriester der Polis.‖5 Yet in 1983 Robert Drews had argued cogently that ancestral monarchy had not existed in Geometric Greece,6 and in 1993 Kurt Raaflaub argued: ―. it seems, by the time of Homer and Hesiod the option of establishing a real monarchy, if it ever existed, was long gone. Accordingly, in archaic Greece there never was a ‗monarchy‘ properly speaking; ‗kings‘ did not disappear, they never existed, and thus the traditional terminology (‗kings‘, ‗kingship‘, ‗monarchy‘) should be eliminated from our books.‖7 Raaflaub‘s phrases ―a real monarchy‖ and ―‗monarchy‘ properly speaking‖ draw attention to an issue of semantics and, in relation to the word ‗king‘, the issue of an appropriate definition. Furthermore, denial of the existence of a prior monarchy clearly challenges the tradition of scholarship concerning the genesis of the Athenian office of βαζηιεύο. (b) The Mechanism for the Origin of the Office of the Βαζηιεύο If the monarchy from which the βαζηιεύο as an official is said to have emerged as a vestige was a monarchy ―properly speaking‖ is it likely to have come to an end by means of mere negotiation? And if it came to an end violently, is it likely that some significant vestige of it would not only be permitted to survive its downfall, but to be welcomed into a reconstituted 5 Barceló (1993) 210-211. Barceló‗s ―Oberpriester der Polis‖ is barely an improvement on Lewis Mumford‘s characterization of the βαζηιεύο as ―a shrine lord‖: Mumford (1961) 144. For Mumford, loc cit., the βαζηιεύο was also ―chief king‖ or ―religious head of the state.‖ 6 Drews (1983). See the generally adverse reviews by, inter alios, Cartledge (1983); Thomas (1983); Rhodes (1984a); Donlan (1984); Stockton (1985); and Fisher (1986). Drews challenged established ―doctrine‖, thus Rhodes (1984a) 180-181. 7 Raaflaub (1993) 79. 8 state as a significant centre of power or influence? On the other hand, if the monarchy was not a monarchy ―properly speaking‖, are we entitled to imagine that the vestige of it that was permitted to remain might still have been an office of substance? How could the vestige be one of substance if the thing from which it emerged was not? Felix Jacoby posited that the collapse of the monarchy in Athens involved revolution: ―I consider the institution of an annually changing ἄξρσλ beside the βαζηιεύο (who need by no means have simultaneously become an annual ‗official‘) to be a single and revolutionary action of the nobility.
Recommended publications
  • THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS of GREEK CITIES: I Aus: Zeitschrift Für Papyrologie Und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288
    ROBERT K. SHERK THE EPONYMOUS OFFICIALS OF GREEK CITIES: I aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 83 (1990) 249–288 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 249 The Eponymous Officials of Greek Cities: I (A) Introduction The eponymous official or magistrate after whom the year was named in Greek cities or as- sociations is well known to all epigraphists under various titles: archon, prytanis, stephanepho- ros, priest, etc. Some details about them have appeared in many articles and in scattered pas- sages of scholarly books. However, not since the publication of Clemens Gnaedinger, De Graecorum magistratibus eponymis quaestiones epigraphicae selectae (Diss. Strassburg 1892) has there been a treatment of the subject as a whole, although the growth of the material in this regard has been enormous.1 What is missing, however, is an attempt to bring the material up to date in a comprehensive survey covering the whole Greek world, at least as far as possible. The present article, of which this is only the first part, will present that material in a geographically organized manner: mainland Greece and the adjacent islands, then the Aegean islands, Asia Minor and Thrace, Syria, Egypt, Cyrene, Sicily, and southern Italy. All the epi- graphic remains of that area have been examined and catalogued. General observations and conclusions will be presented after the evidence as a whole has been given. I. Earliest Examples of Eponymity The earliest form of writing appeared in Sumer and Assyria sometime within the last half of the fourth millennium BC, and from there it spread westward. Thus, it is not at all surpris- ing that the Mesopotamian civilizations also made the earliest use of assigning names or events to years in dating historical records.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ependytes in Classical Athens
    THE EPENDYTES IN CLASSICAL ATHENS (PLATES 51-55) To the memoryof Richard D. Sullivan T HE FEW REFERENCES to the ependytes in Classical Greek literature occur in three fragments of Attic drama preserved by Pollux (VII.45): XLTWV EpELSSXLTCTVLOTKOS' XLTCeJVLOV, LaTLOV. ETEL E KaL 0 E(XEV8VVT7)S- EOTLV EV T7 TCV 7OXX XP7OEL, OOTLS' /3OVXOLTO KaL TOVTC TO ovo4LalTL /07)OE^LV .avIX() OVTL, XA7pTTEOvavro EK TCeV 1o00OK\EOVS1 IXvvTpLCOV (TrGF, F 439): 7rE-atXOVSTE v77oaL XLVOYEVE^LST' E'JTEv8VTas. KaL ?EOT7LS UE 7TOVO')TLV EV T^ HEvOEZL(TrGF, I, F 1 c): 'pyq( VOMLJ'EVE/3PL' EXELTEV 3VT7_VV. aVTLKPVS'86E OKELTO E'VTi- NLKOXacpovs,'HpaKXEL X0PopYW (I, p. 771.5 Kock): 4pEPEVVZV TaXECos, XLTCvJa TOVO E7XEV8VTflV Tf VVVXP/3VVXEL EL LV. The lines are disappointingly undescriptive,indicating only that an ependytes can be of linen and is somehow associatedwith the chiton, and that at an earlier period (?) it had a more general meaning, closer to the root of the word, as "thatwhich is put on over."1 Works frequently cited are abbreviatedas follows: Add = L. Burn and R. Glynn, Beazley Addenda,Oxford 1982 Bieber = M. Bieber, History of the Greekand Roman Theater,2nd ed., Princeton 1981 Burn = L. Burn, The Meidias Painter, Oxford 1987 Laskares = N. Laskares, Mop4aL LEpE'(V (X;r'LapXaLov MV7JEfLV?>>, AE?\T 8, 1923 (1925), pp. 103-116 LSAM = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacre'esde l'Asie Mineure, Paris 1955 LSCG = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacreesdes cite'sgrecques, Paris 1969 LSCG-S = F. Sokolowski,Lois sacre'esdes cite'sgrecques. Supple'ment, Paris 1962 Mantes = A. G.
    [Show full text]
  • Agorapicbk-17.Pdf
    Excavations of the Athenian Agora Picture Book No. 17 Prepared by Mabel L. Lang Dedicated to Eugene Vanderpool o American School of Classical Studies at Athens ISBN 87661-617-1 Produced by the Meriden Gravure Company Meriden, Connecticut COVER: Bone figure of Socrates TITLE PAGE: Hemlock SOCRATES IN THE AGORA AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 1978 ‘Everything combines to make our knowledge of Socrates himself a subject of Socratic irony. The only thing we know definitely about him is that we know nothing.’ -L. Brunschvicg As FAR AS we know Socrates himselfwrote nothing, yet not only were his life and words given dramatic attention in his own time in the Clouds of Ar- istophanes, but they have also become the subject of many others’ writing in the centuries since his death. Fourth-century B.C. writers who had first-hand knowledge of him composed either dialogues in which he was the dominant figure (Plato and Aeschines) or memories of his teaching and activities (Xe- nophon). Later authors down even to the present day have written numerous biographies based on these early sources and considering this most protean of philosophers from every possible point of view except perhaps the topograph- ical one which is attempted here. Instead of putting Socrates in the context of 5th-century B.C. philosophy, politics, ethics or rhetoric, we shall look to find him in the material world and physical surroundings of his favorite stamping- grounds, the Athenian Agora. Just as ‘agora’ in its original sense meant ‘gathering place’ but came in time to mean ‘market place’, so the agora itself was originally a gathering place I.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Athenian Prytaneion Discovered? 35
    HESPERIA 75 (2006) THE ATHENIAN Pages 33-81 PRYTANEION DISCOVERED? ABSTRACT The author proposes that the Athenian Prytaneion, one of the city's most important civic buildings, was located in the peristyle complex beneath Agia Aikaterini Square, near the ancient Street of the Tripods and theMonument of Lysikrates in the modern Plaka. This thesis, which is consistent with Pausa s nias topographical account of ancient Athens, is supported by archaeological and epigraphical evidence. The identification of the Prytaneion at the eastern foot of the Acropolis helps to reconstruct the map of Archaic and Classical Athens and illuminates the testimony of Herodotos and Thucydides. most The Prytaneion is the oldest and important of the civic buildings in to us ancient Athens that have remained lost until the present.1 For the or Athenians the Prytaneion, town hall, the office of the city's chief official, as a symbolized the foundation of Athens city-state, its construction form ing an integral part of Theseus's legendary synoecism of Attica (Thuc. 2.15.2; Plut. Thes. 24.3). Like other prytaneia throughout the Greek world, the Athenian Prytaneion represented what has been termed the very "life common of the polis," housing the hearth of the city, the "inextinguishable and immovable flame" of the goddess Hestia.2 As the ceremonial center was of Athens, the Prytaneion the site of both public entertainment for 1.1 am to the to a excellent for greatly indebted express my heartfelt thanks number suggestions improving this 1st Ephoreia of Prehistoric and Classi of scholars who have given generously article.
    [Show full text]
  • Arkeolojik Verilere Göre Doğu Trakya Kuzey Yolu*
    Arkeolojik Verilere Göre Doğu Trakya Kuzey Yolu* Ergün Karaca** Öz Küçük Asya ile Avrupa arasında geçiş noktası konumundaki Doğu Trakya, her iki kıtadan gelen yolların geçiş ve birleşme yeri olmuştur. Kuzey Yolu, bölgeden geçen Via Egnatia ve Via Militaris ile birlikte üç ana yoldan biridir. Pontos Euksenos (Kara- deniz)’in batısı veya kuzeyine ya da tam tersi buradan Küçük Asya’ya doğru yapılan seferlerde MÖ 6. yüzyıldan MS 19. yüzyıla kadar tüm kara orduların kullandığı gü- zergâh olmuştur. Buna karşın Kuzey Yolu’nun güzergâhı üzerindeki arkeolojik veriler diğer yollar kadar değerlendirilmemiştir. Bu makalede arazi çalışması sırasında tespit edilen ve incelenen başta Kurtdere Köprüsü olmak üzere köprü, yol kalıntısı ve mil taşı kullanılarak Kuzey Yolu’nun Doğu Trakya Bölgesi içindeki güzergâhı tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca Kuzey Yolu’nun güneyindeki Via Militaris ile kuzeyindeki Salmy- dessos kenti ile bağlantı sağlayan yollar arkeolojik verilere göre değerlendirilmiştir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Antik Çağ’da Ulaşım, Mil taşı, Tabula Peutingeriana, Köprü. * Bu çalışma Trakya Üniversitesi, Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi (TÜBAP) tarafından TÜBAP -2018/119 numaralı proje kapsamında desteklenmiştir. Makalede kullanılan harita ve fotoğraflar aksi belirtilmediği sürece tarafıma aittir. Ayrıca metinde kullanılan bilgiler, tarafımca 2014 yılında Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı’nın izni ve Kırklareli Müzesi’nin denetiminde gerçekleştirilen yüzey araştırmasının verileridir. ** Dr., Trakya Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Arkeoloji Bölümü, Edirne/TÜRKİYE, [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-0270-3258 Makale Gönderim Tarihi: 02.05.2018 - Makale Kabul Tarihi: 09.01.2020 30 Ergün Karaca The North Road of Eastern Thrace according to Archeological Data Abstract East Thrace, which is the transition point between Asia Minor and Europe, has become the transit and the junction point of roads from both continents.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SANCTUARY at EPIDAUROS and CULT-BASED NETWORKING in the GREEK WORLD of the FOURTH CENTURY B.C. a Thesis Presented in Partial
    THE SANCTUARY AT EPIDAUROS AND CULT-BASED NETWORKING IN THE GREEK WORLD OF THE FOURTH CENTURY B.C. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University by Pamela Makara, B.A. The Ohio State University 1992 Master's Examination Committee: Approved by Dr. Timothy Gregory Dr. Jack Ba I cer Dr. Sa u I Corne I I VITA March 13, 1931 Born - Lansing, Michigan 1952 ..... B.A. in Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 1952-1956, 1966-Present Teacher, Detroit, Michigan; Rochester, New York; Bowling Green, Ohio 1966-Present ............. University work in Education, Art History, and Ancient Greek and Roman History FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: History Studies in Ancient Civi I izations: Dr. Timothy Gregory and Dr. Jack Balcer i i TABLE OF CONTENTS VITA i i LIST OF TABLES iv CHAPTER PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 1 I I. ANCIENT EPIDAUROS AND THE CULT OF ASKLEPIOS 3 I II. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI DECREES 9 IV. EPIDAURIAN THEOROI 21 v. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS 23 VI. AN ARGIVE THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 37 VII. A DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 42 VIII. SUMMARY 47 END NOTES 49 BIBLIOGRAPHY 55 APPENDICES A. EPIDAURIAN THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTIONS AND TRANSLATIONS 58 B. ARGIVE THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT I ON 68 C. DELPHIC THEARODOKOI INSCRIPTION 69 D. THEARODOKO I I NSCR I PT IONS PARALLELS 86 iii LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1. Thearodoko i I nscr i pt ions Para I I e Is •••••••••••• 86 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Any evidence of I inkage in the ancient world is valuable because it clarifies the relationships between the various peoples of antiquity and the dealings they had with one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric: Aspasia's Story
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work Spring 5-1999 Feminist Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric: Aspasia's Story Amy Suzanne Lawless University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Lawless, Amy Suzanne, "Feminist Revisionary Histories of Rhetoric: Aspasia's Story" (1999). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/322 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL N a me: _ dm~ - .l..4ul ~ ___________ ---------------------------- College: ___ M..5...~-~_ Department: ___(gI1~~~ -$!7;.h2j~~ ----- Faculty Mentor: ___lIs ...!_)Au~! _ ..A±~:JJ-------------------------- PROJECT TITLE: - __:fum~tU'it __ .&~\'?lP.0.:-L.!T __W-~~ · SS__ ~T__ Eb:b?L(k.!_ A; ' I -------------- ~~Jl~3-- -2b~1------------------------------ --------------------------------------------. _------------- I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors
    [Show full text]
  • Greece--Selected Problems
    REPORT RESUMES ED 013 992 24 AA 000 260 GREECE -- SELECTED PROBLEMS. BY- MARTONFFY, ANDREA PONTECORVO AND OTHERS CHICAGO UNIV., ILL. REPORT NUMBER BR-62445...1 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.50HC-$4.60 113F. DESCRIPTORS- *CURRICULUM GUIDES, *GREEK CIVILIZATION, *CULTURE, CULTURAL INTERRELATIONSHIPS,*PROBLEM SETS, *SOCIAL STUDIES, ANCIENT HISTORY, HIGH SCHOOL CURRICULUM A CURRICULUM GUIDE IS PRESENTED FOR A 10-WEEK STUDYOF ANCIENT GREEK CIVILIZATION AT THE 10TH -GRADE LEVEL.TEACHING MATERIALS FOR THE UNIT INCLUDE (1) PRIMARY ANDSECONDARY SOURCES DEALING WITH THE PERIOD FROM THE BRONZE AGETHROUGH THE HELLENISTIC PERIOD,(2) GEOGRAPHY PROBLEMS, AND (3) CULTURAL MODEL PROBLEM EXERCISES. THOSE CONCEPTSWITH WHICH THE STUDENT SHOULD GAIN MOST FAMILIARITY INCLUDETHE EXISTENCE OF THE UNIVERSAL CATEGORIES OF CULTURE(ECONOMICS, SOCIAL ORGANIZATION, POLITICAL ORGANIZATION,RELIGION, KNOWLEDGE, AND ARTS), THE INTERRELATEDNESS OF THESE CATEGORIES AT ANY GIVEN POINT IN TIME, AND THEINFLUENCE WHICH CHANGES IN ONE OF THESE MAY FLAY INPRECIPITATING LARGE -SCALE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHANGE. ANINTRODUCTION TO THE BIOLOGICAL DETERMINANTS (INDIVIDUAL GENETICCOMPOSITIONS) AND GEOGRAPHICAL DETERMINANTS (TOPOGRAPHY, CLIMATE,LOCATION, AND RESOURCES) OF GREEK CIVILIZATION IS PROVIDED.THE STUDENT IS ALSO INTRODUCED TO THE IDEA OF CULTURALDIFFUSION OR CULTURE BORROWING. (TC) .....Siiiir.i.......0.161,...4iliaalla.lilliW116,6".."`""_ GREECE:, SELEcT DPRO-BLES . Andrea POcorvoMartonffy& JOISApt, I. g ... EdgarBerwein, Geral Edi rs 4 CHICAGO SOCIALSTU i OJECT TRIAL EDITION Materials
    [Show full text]
  • Proud to Be Euboeans: the Chalcidians of Thrace
    Proud to be Euboeans: The Chalcidians of Thrace Selene E. PSOMA Περίληψη Οι Χαλκιδείς της Θράκης, όπως αναφέρονται στην αρχαία γραμματεία και τις επιγραφές, ήταν Ευ- βοείς άποικοι στη χερσόνησο της Χαλκιδικής που ζούσαν σε μικρές πόλεις στο μυχό του κόλπου της Τορώνης και στη Σιθωνία. Η Όλυνθος παραδόθηκε στους Χαλκιδείς το 479 και εκείνοι αργότερα δη- μιούργησαν το ισχυρό κοινό των Χαλκιδέων. Οι δεσμοί τους με τη μητρόπολη τεκμαίρονται από το ημερολόγιο τους, την ονοματολογία, το χαλκιδικό αλφάβητο, το ακροφωνικό σύστημα αρίθμησης, καθώς επίσης και από τη νομισματοκοπία. Αυτό το άρθρο εξετάζει όλα τα στοιχεία δίνοντας ιδιαίτερη έμφαση στη νομισματοκοπία. Introduction The ties between Euboean Chalcis and the Chalcidians of Thrace are mentioned by both Aristotle and authors of later date.1 Aristotle, who was born a Chalcidian of Thrace and died in Chalcis, mentions that the Chalcidians of Thrace asked Androdamas of Rhegion to become their lawgiver (nomothetes).2 Rhegion was also a Chalcidian colony, and it was quite common for a colony to ask for lawgivers from one of its sister cities. Another story that Aristotle relates will be discussed at length later. According to Polybius, the Chalcidians of Thrace were colonists of both Athens and Chalcis, and the main opponent to Philip II in Thrace.3 Strabo noted that Eretria founded the cities of Pallene and Athos whereas Chalcis founded those near Olynthus.4 The foundation of these colonies took place when the Hippobotai were rul- ing Chalcis, and the men who led the colonists were among the noblest of their cities. Plutarch mentions the struggle between Chalcidians and Andrians over the foundation of Akanthos in the 7th century BC.5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Classical Museum: a Journal of Philology, and of Ancient History and Literature: Volume 1 Edited by Leonhard Schmitz Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-05778-3 - The Classical Museum: A Journal of Philology, and of Ancient History and Literature: Volume 1 Edited by Leonhard Schmitz Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY COLLECTION Books of enduring scholarly value Classics From the Renaissance to the nineteenth century, Latin and Greek were compulsory subjects in almost all European universities, and most early modern scholars published their research and conducted international correspondence in Latin. Latin had continued in use in Western Europe long after the fall of the Roman empire as the lingua franca of the educated classes and of law, diplomacy, religion and university teaching. The flight of Greek scholars to the West after the fall of Constantinople in 1453 gave impetus to the study of ancient Greek literature and the Greek New Testament. Eventually, just as nineteenth-century reforms of university curricula were beginning to erode this ascendancy, developments in textual criticism and linguistic analysis, and new ways of studying ancient societies, especially archaeology, led to renewed enthusiasm for the Classics. This collection offers works of criticism, interpretation and synthesis by the outstanding scholars of the nineteenth century. The Classical Museum Born near Aachen, Leonhard Schmitz (1807–90) studied at the University of Bonn, from which he received his PhD, before marrying an Englishwoman and becoming a naturalised British citizen. Made famous by the 1844 publication of his translation of Niebuhr’s Lectures on the History of Rome, he became rector of the Royal High School, Edinburgh, where he taught Alexander Graham Bell. He also briefly tutored the future Edward VII (and he had previously taught Prince Albert in Bonn).
    [Show full text]
  • ARISTIDES and the Llterature of the PAST CHAPTER ONE
    PART ONE ARISTIDES AND THE llTERATURE OF THE PAST CHAPTER ONE ARISTIDES AND EARLY GREEK LYRIC, ELEGIAC AND IAMBIC POETRY EWEN BowiE This paper investigates Aristides' quotations of and allusions to early Greek lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry. One reason for its restriction to these poets is that I have been looking at their citation and other ways they are drawn upon in a number of imperial Greek texts. 1 But an equally important reason for the exclusion of other early poetry, above all of Homer, Hesiod and other hexameter poetry, is because its inclu­ sion would undoubtedly have raised issues that would have required a much longer paper. The London doctorate of T.K. Gkourogiannis, entitled Pindaric Qyotations in Aelius Aristides, completed in 1999, regis­ tered the presence in Aristides of 253 citations of the Iliad and 93 of the 04Jssey. 2 This is a far larger number than Aristides' quotations of tragedy or comedy, where Gkourogiannis documented 45 for Aristo­ phanes; 26 for Euripides; 16 for Sophocles; 10 for Aeschylus; and five each for Eupolis, Cratinus and Menander. In some respects the pro­ portion of these quotations between Homer, tragedy and comedy show Aristides to be not dissimilar to other authors writing in this period, or to what we know of readers' habits from papyri, 3 though the frequency of Aristides' citation of Menander is rather low, and of Aristophanes rather high: this is partly because of his extensive exploitation of Aristo­ phanes for Athenian history in Oration 3 (which has some 16 citations), partly, I suspect, because Aristides was drawn, or was made by his tutor Alexander of Cotiaeum, to read Aristophanes with due care and atten­ tion in order to beef up his Atticism.4 1 In Athenaeus, Bowie 2ooo; in Plutarch, Bowie 1997 and forthcoming (b); in Philostratus' Apollonius in Bowie forthcoming (a); in Stobaeus in Bowie forthcoming (c).
    [Show full text]