DOCSLIB.ORG

Tribal Historic Preservation Officers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tribal Historic Preservation Officers ^ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND Tribal Historic Preservation Officers Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPOs) are officially designated by federally-recognized Native American tribes to direct preservation programs approved by the National Park Service (NPS). The THPO assumes some or all of the functions and responsibilities of State Historic Preservation Officers on tribal lands. The NPS distributes Historic Preservation Fund grants, which are typically matched by Tribes, to THPOs Barnaby Lewis, an Akimel Odham Elder and Tribal Historic by apportionment formula. Preservation Officer for the Gila River Indian Community, at Robbins Butte in southwest Arizona. PHOTO BY ELIAS BUTLER Background For many years, THPOs have received insufficient federal funding to fully implement their federally mandated FY 2021 Appropriations Request responsibilities. There were only 12 federally recognized THPOs when the program began in 1996, with $79,875 going to each. In 2019, for example, 187 THPOs received Please support $22 million for Tribal Historic an average of $62,754 in funding. Preservation Officers in the FY 2021 Interior Appropriations bill. Collectively, Tribes with NPS-recognized THPOs exercise responsibilities over a land base that exceeds 50 million APPROPRIATIONS BILL: Interior, Environment, acres in 30 states. THPOs review federal undertakings— and Related Agencies including projects using federal funding or requiring AGENCY: National Park Service federal approval—for their impacts on tribal historic resources (Section 106 review). In 2018, THPOs reviewed ACCOUNT: Historic Preservation Fund more than 126,000 federal undertakings and provided ACTIVITY: Grants to Tribes 7,000 National Register of Historic Places (National Register) eligibility opinions. THPOs also survey and Recent Funding History: maintain inventories of tribal historic resources, prepare FY 2018 Enacted Funding: $11.485 million preservation plans, and provide technical assistance FY 2019 Enacted Funding $11.735 million and funding for preservation activities. THPOs facilitate nominations to the National Register, and added 48 FY 2020 Enacted Funding: $13.735 million properties to the National Register and nominated more FY 2021 President’s Budget Request: $5.738 million than 8,000 properties to Tribal Registers in 2018. Along FY 2021 NTHP Recommendation: $22 million with local, state, and federal law enforcement, THPOs work to prosecute looters of Indian remains and sacred JUSTIFICATION: Tribal Historic Preservation Officers are in objects. They also provide oversight for repatriation per great need of federal funding as the number of THPOs has grown dramatically since the creation of the program. Currently, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation there are nearly 200 THPOs. Increased funding would help Act (NAGPRA). address significant shortfalls in THPO funding needs. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE^ HISTORIC PRESERVATION FUND Recognized Tribal Historic Preservation Officers* ALABAMA Wilton Rancheria Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux The Confederated Tribes of Grand Poarch Band of Creek Indians Wiyot Tribe Tribes Ronde Community of Oregon Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation Northern Cheyenne Tribe Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation ALASKA Yurok Tribe Organized Village of Kake NEBRASKA Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon COLORADO Omaha Tribe of Nebraska Coquille Indian Tribe ARIZONA Ute Mountain Ute Tribe Ponca Tribe of Nebraska Colorado River Indian Tribes Santee Sioux Nation Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians Gila River Indian Community CONNECTICUT Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska Mashantucket Western Pequot Tribal Hopi Tribe of Arizona RHODE ISLAND Nation NEVADA Hualapai Tribe Mohegan Tribe of Indians of Duckwater Shoeshone Tribe of the Narragansett Indian Tribe The Navajo Nation Connecticut Duckwater Reservation Pascua Yaqui Tribe of Arizona Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe SOUTH CAROLINA Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian FLORIDA Reno-Sparks Indian Colony Catawba Indian Nation Community Seminole Tribe of Florida Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California San Carlos Apache Tribe SOUTH DAKOTA Tohono Nation IDAHO NEW MEXICO Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe White Mountain Apache Tribe Coeur d’Alene Tribe Jicarilla Apache Nation Crow Creek Sioux Tribe Nez Perce Tribe Mescalero Apache Tribe Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe CALIFORNIA The Navajo Nation Oglala Sioux Tribe Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians KANSAS Pueblo of Acoma Rosebud Sioux Tribe of Indians Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska Rancheria The Pueblo of Isleta Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens LOUISIANA Pueblo of Jemez Yankton Sioux Tribe Valley Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana Pueblo of Laguna UTAH Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana Pueblo of Pojoaque The Navajo Nation Bishop Paiute Tribe Jena Band of Choctaw Indians Pueblo of San Felipe Blue Lake Rancheria Tribe of Indians Pueblo of San Ildefonso Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana WASHINGTON Bridgeport Indian Colony Pueblo of Santa Ana MAINE Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Pueblo of Santa Clara Yakama Nation Indians Aroostook Band of Micmacs Pueblo of Tesuque Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Cahuilla Band of Indians Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians Pueblo of Zia Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of Passamaquoddy Tribe Zuni Pueblo Confederated Tribes of the Colville the Trinidad Rancheria Penobscot Nation Reservation Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo NEW YORK Hoh Indian Tribe Indians MASSACHUSETTS The Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe Elem Indian Colony Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head- Seneca Nation of Indians Lummi Nation Elk Valley Rancheria Aquinnah Makah Tribe Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians NORTH CAROLINA MICHIGAN Nooksak Indian Tribe Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Port Gamble S’Klallam Tribe Fort Independence Paiute Indians Bay Mills Indian Community Quinault Indian Nation Habematolel Band of Pomo Indians Keweenaw Bay Indian Community NORTH DAKOTA Samish Indian Nation Hoopa Valley Tribe Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation Superior Chippewa Indians Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Spirit Lake Tribe of Fort Totten Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Skokomish Indian Tribe Jamul Indian Village Standing Rock Sioux Tribe Indians Spokane Tribe of Indians Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Squaxin Island Tribe Stewarts Point Rancheria Pottawatomi Indians of Michigan OKLAHOMA Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Karuk Tribe Nottawaseppi Huron Band of the Manzanita Band of Diegueno Indians Potawatomi Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Suquamish Tribe Mechoopda Band of Chico Pokagon Band of Potawatomi Indians Caddo Nation Swinomish Indian Tribal Community Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Cherokee Nation Indians of California Michigan Cheyenne & Arapaho Tribes WISCONSIN Morongo Band of Mission Indians Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of the Chippewa Pala Band of Mission Indians MINNESOTA Citizen Potawatomi Nation Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians Forest County Potawatomi Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Comanche Nation Community Indians Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma Chippewa The Ho-Chunk Nation Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Miami Tribe of Oklahoma Indians Grand Portage Band of Lake Superior Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Muscogee Creek Nation Superior Chippewa Indians of Pinoleville Pomo Nation Chippewa Osage Nation Wisconsin Pit River Tribe Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Lower Sioux Indian Community Otoe-Missouria Tribe of Oklahoma Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Superior Chippewa Indians Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma Indians Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin Prairie Island Indian Community of Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma Round Valley Indian Tribes Oneida Nation of Wisconsin San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Indians Minnesota Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma (O-Gah- Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Sherwood Valley Band of Pomo Chippewa Indians of California Upper Sioux Community Pah) Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Stockbridge-Munsee Community Band Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians White Earth Nation of Minnesota of Mohican Indians Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians Chippewa Seneca Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma Stewarts Point Rancheria Kashia Band Thlopthlocco Tribal Town WYOMING MONTANA of Pomo Indians Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Shoshone Tribe of the Wind River Susanville Indian Rancheria The Blackfeet Nation Wyandotte Nation Reservation Timbisha Shoshone Tribe Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Northern Arapaho Tribe Boy’s Reservation Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation OREGON Confederated Salish and Kootenai Burns Paiute Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Tribes *As of December 1, 2019: http://nathpo. Indians Confederated Tribes of the Coos, org/wp/thpos/find-a-thpo The Crow Tribe of Indians United Auburn Indian Community Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians Fort Belknap Indian Community ^ For additional information, contact Tom Cassidy, Vice President of Government Relations, [email protected], (202) 588-6078..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010
    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
    [Show full text]
  • From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-Creation of the Tribal Identity On
    From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican Contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 By Kumiko Noguchi B.A. (University of the Sacred Heart) 2000 M.A. (Rikkyo University) 2003 Dissertation Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Native American Studies in the Office of Graduate Studies of the University of California Davis Approved Steven J. Crum Edward Valandra Jack D. Forbes Committee in Charge 2009 i UMI Number: 3385709 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3385709 Copyright 2009 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Kumiko Noguchi September, 2009 Native American Studies From Yokuts to Tule River Indians: Re-creation of the Tribal Identity on the Tule River Indian Reservation in California from Euroamerican contact to the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 Abstract The main purpose of this study is to show the path of tribal development on the Tule River Reservation from 1776 to 1936. It ends with the year of 1936 when the Tule River Reservation reorganized its tribal government pursuant to the Indian Reorganization Act (IRA) of 1934.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List Page 1 of 8 Nunakauyarmiut Tribe $500,950 1
    Department of Justice Fiscal Year 2020 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation Combined Award List ALASKA AMOUNT: $13,596,823 Alaska Native Justice Center $450,000 6. Children’s Justice Act Partnerships for Indian Communities (OVC) $450,000 Aleutian Pribilof Islands Association, Inc. $880,702 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $880,702 Asa'carsarmiut Tribal Council $387,415 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $387,415 Central Council Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska $1,208,431 4. Tribal Justice System Infrastructure Program (BJA) $1,208,431 Fairbanks Native Association $416,030 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Kawerak, Inc. $1,229,928 3. Justice Systems and Alcohol and Substance Abuse (BJA) $813,898 9. Tribal Youth Program (OJJDP) $416,030 Koyukuk Native Village $437,628 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $437,628 Maniilaq Association $699,015 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $699,015 Manokotak Village Council $362,390 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $362,390 Native Village of Fort Yukon $390,820 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $390,820 Native Village of Kwinhagak $306,123 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $306,123 Native Village of Napakiak $453,859 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $453,859 Native Village of Nunapitchuk $465,365 1. Public Safety and Community Policing (COPS) $465,365 Native Village of Port Graham $272,618 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $272,618 Native Village of Port Heiden $385,000 5. Violence Against Women Tribal Governments Program (OVW) $385,000 Native Village of Shageluk $413,426 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 20/Tuesday, January
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 20 / Tuesday, January 30, 2018 / Notices 4235 Type of Information Collection: electronic, mechanical, or other Disaster Grants—Public Assistance Revision of a currently approved technological collection techniques or (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, information collection. other forms of information technology, Hazard Mitigation Grant. OMB Number: 1660–0085. e.g., permitting electronic submission of Brock Long, FEMA Forms: FEMA Form 003–0–1, responses. Administrator, Federal Emergency Crisis Counseling Assistance and Dated: January 25, 2018. Management Agency. Training Program, Immediate Services [FR Doc. 2018–01775 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] Program Application; FEMA Form 003– William H. Holzerland, 0–2, Crisis Counseling Assistance and Sr. Director for Information Management, BILLING CODE 9111–23–P Training Program, Regular Services Mission Support, Department of Homeland Security. Program Application; SF–424, Application for Federal Assistance; SF– [FR Doc. 2018–01765 Filed 1–29–18; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BILLING CODE 9111–23–P 424A, Budget Information for Non- Bureau of Indian Affairs Construction Programs; SF–425, Federal Financial Report; HHS Checklist/08– [189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND A0A501010.999900 253G] 2007; HHS Project Performance Site SECURITY Location Form; ISP report narrative; Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible Quarterly Report Narratives; Final RSP Federal Emergency Management To Receive Services From the United Report Narrative,. Agency Abstract: The CCP consists of two States Bureau of Indian Affairs [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA–3392– grant programs, the Immediate Services AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, EM; Docket ID FEMA–2018–0001] Program (ISP) and the Regular Services Interior. Program (RSP).
    [Show full text]
  • 28Th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering
    California Indian Conference andGathering Indian Conference California October 3-5,2013 “Honor Our Past, Celebrate Our Present, and and OurPresent, Celebrate “Honor OurPast, Nurture Our Future Generations” OurFuture Nurture 28TH ANNUAL | California State University, Sacramento University, State California PAINTINGPAINTING BY LYNL RISLING (KARUK, (KARUK YUROKYUROK, AND HUPA) “TÁAT KARU YUPSÍITANACH” (REPRESENTS A MOTHER AND BABY FROM TRIBES OF NORTHWES NORTHWESTERNTERN CALIFORNIA) letter from the Planning Committee Welcome to the 28th Annual California Indian Conference and Gathering We are honored to have you attending and participating in this conference. Many people, organizations and Nations have worked hard and contributed in various ways. It makes us feel good in our hearts to welcome each and every person. We come together to learn from each other and enjoy seeing long-time friends, as well as, meeting new ones. The California Indian Conference and Gathering is an annual event for the exchange of views and Information among academics, educators, California Indians, students, tribal nations, native organizations and community members focusing on California Indians. This year, the conference is held at California State University, Sacramento. Indians and non-Indians will join together to become aware of current issues, as well as the history and culture of the first peoples of this state. A wide variety of Front cover: topics will be presented, including: sovereignty, leadership, dance, storytelling, The painting is titled, “Taat karu native languages, histories, law, political and social issues, federal recognition, Yupsíitanach” (Mother and Baby). The health, families and children, education, economic development, arts, traditions painting represents a mother and and numerous other relevant topics.
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians
    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterman 1934: 3-4
    a state society (i.e., Euro-American) in the historic past, manu- factured either by direct political or indirect economic pressures (1975). Thus, the concept "triblet" may, indeed, describe the situation in the entire Country. To reiterate, in California, triblets were organized around a central community for a number of nearby sub-ordinate settlements. However, in northwestern California, political organization was characterized by extreme fractionalism; the triblet was a loosely connected set of separate settlements, and people clustered in a town or village which did not have the sense of cohesiveness and continuity of other areas. Individualism, or atomism, was the rule for the Tolowa, Hupa, Chil- ula, Wiyot, Karok, and Yurok. Within certain class boundaries, north- western California was characterized by a man struggling for himself and his immediate family--competition rather than cooperation was the ideal (Bean 1974). Factionalism of the typical triblet pattern was reflected in other aspects of northwestern California culture. For instance in regard to marriage practices: ... apart from the generic tendency to seek wives 'downstream,' the Tolowa and Karok sought wives not only in the immediately adjacent Yurok dis- tricts, but also to some degree in farther ones; and the Yurok reciprocated correspondingly. The Hupa and Chilula, on the contrary, exchanged wives and husbands with the Yurok almost exclu- sively in the Weitspus district. This differ- ence seems to be connected with the Tolowa and Karok being on the upstream-downstream line, as the Yurok construe the world, but the Hupa and Chilula living in a 'side-stream' or 'up-hill' direction. Intercourse and relations evidently flowed most freely along the main thoroughfare of the Klamath and its coastwise 'continuation' (Waterman 1934: 3-4).
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Heritage Commission Response to HCD 2018 CDBG-DR
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA Gavin Newsom, Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION November 18, 2020 Joseph Helo, Program Manager CA Department of Housing and Community Development CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Via Email to: [email protected] Luiseño Cc to: [email protected] VICE CHAIRPERSO N Re: Native American Contact List for the Owner Occupied Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Reginald Pagali ng Program - 2018 Community Development Block Grant-Disaster Recovery Project, Lake and Chumash Ventura Counties SECRETARY Dear Mr. Helo: Merri Lopez-Keifer Luiseño Attached are lists of tribes that have cultural and traditional affiliation to the area of potential effect (APE) for the project referenced above. I suggest you contact all of the tribes listed, and PARLIAMENTARI AN if they cannot supply information regarding the presence of cultural resources, they may Russell Attebe ry recommend others with specific knowledge. The list should provide a starting place to locate Karuk areas of potential adverse impact within the APE. By contacting all those on the list, your organization will better able to respond to claims of failure to consult, as consultation may be COMMISSIONER required under specific state Statutes. If a response from the tribe has not been received within Marshall McKay two weeks of notification, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) requests that you Wintun follow up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. COMMISSIONER William Mungary The NAHC also recommends that the project proponents conduct a record search of the Paiute/White Mountain NAHC’s Sacred Lands File (SLF) and also of the appropriate regional archaeological Apache Information Center of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) to determine if any tribal cultural resources are located within the APE of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes
    National Plant Data Team August 2012 Edible Seeds and Grains of California Tribes and the Klamath Tribe of Oregon in the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum of Anthropology Collections, University of California, Berkeley August 2012 Cover photos: Left: Maidu woman harvesting tarweed seeds. Courtesy, The Field Museum, CSA1835 Right: Thick patch of elegant madia (Madia elegans) in a blue oak woodland in the Sierra foothills The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its pro- grams and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sex- ual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250–9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Acknowledgments This report was authored by M. Kat Anderson, ethnoecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Jim Effenberger, Don Joley, and Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, senior seed bota- nists, California Department of Food and Agriculture Plant Pest Diagnostics Center. Special thanks to the Phoebe Apperson Hearst Museum staff, especially Joan Knudsen, Natasha Johnson, Ira Jacknis, and Thusa Chu for approving the project, helping to locate catalogue cards, and lending us seed samples from their collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Central California Agency
    Tolowa Northern California Elk Valley Agency Resighini Karuk q Yurok Quartz Valley Big Lagoon Trinidad Hoopa Valley Fort Bidwell Blue Lake Pit River Tribe Northern Calif Agency Table Bluff Alturas Cedarville Rohnerville 364 Knollcrest Drive, Ste 105 Redding, CA 96002 Pit River Tribe 530-223-7960 Central CalIifD AAgeHncOy Redding Laytonville 650 Capitol Mall, Ste 8-500 Sherwood Valley Sacramento, CA 95814 916-930-3680 Redwood Valley Susanville Round Valley Coyote Valley Southern Calif Agency Pinoleville Paskenta Greenville Guidiville Grindstone 1451 Research Park Dr, Ste 100 Riverside, CA 92507 Potter Valley ! Berry Creek 951-276-6624 Robinson Mechoopda Scotts Valley Enterprise Manchester-Point Arena Upper Lake Colusa Mooretown Palm Springs Agency Hopland Elem Indian Colony PO Box 2245 Big Valley Cortina Stewarts Point Palm Springs, CA 92263 Middletown Auburn 760-416-2133 Yocha Dehe Pacific Regional Office ^ Cloverdale Koi Nation Graton Shingle Springs 2800 Cottage Way Dry Creek Washoe Sacramento, CA 95825 Wilton ^Ione 916-978-6000 Jackson Lytton Buena Vista Sheep Ranch Bridgeport Chicken Ranch Tuolumne Central California C A L I F O R N I A Western Regional Office Agency Benton Picayune North Fork Bishop Table Mountain Big Sandy Cold Springs Big Pine Timbisha Shoshone Fort Independence Santa Rosa Rancheria Lone Pine Timbisha Shoshone Tule River 0 50 100 ^Tejon Miles Santa Ynez ^ TRIBAL OFFICES TRIBAL LANDS Public Domain Allotments Palm Springs Fort Mojave Agency Datum: NAD83 Southern California San Manuel Agua Caliente The boundaries depicted on this map Santa Rosa Reservation Chemehuevi are for display purposes only. This data Morongo Twenty-Nine Palms does not address encroachments or Agency Cabazon questions of location, boundary, and area Soboba which an accurate survey may disclose.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 98/Monday, May 24, 2021/Notices
    27892 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 98 / Monday, May 24, 2021 / Notices 225. Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of 273. Tolowa Dee-ni’ Nation Commission (‘‘Commission’’) Michigan 274. Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 226. Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian 275. Tonto Apache Tribe 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the Community 276. Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla countervailing duty and antidumping 227. Samish Indian Tribe Indians duty orders on certain steel grating from 228. San Carlos Apache Tribe 277. Tulalip Tribes of Washington China would be likely to lead to 229. San Manual Band of Mission 278. Tule River Tribe continuation or recurrence of material Indians 279. Tunica-Biloxi Indians of Louisiana injury to an industry in the United 230. San Pasqual Band of Diegueno 280. Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk States within a reasonably foreseeable Mission Indians Indians time. 231. Santa Rosa Rancheria Tachi-Yokut 281. Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Tribe Indians Background 232. Santa Ynez Band of Chumash 282. Twenty-Nine Palms Band of The Commission instituted these Mission Indians Mission Indians reviews on October 1, 2020 (85 FR 233. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe 283. United Auburn Indian Community 61981) and determined on January 4, 234. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa 284. Upper Sioux Community 2021 that it would conduct expedited Indians 285. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of reviews (86 FR 19286, April 13, 2021). 235. Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians Washington The Commission made these 236. Seminole Nation of Oklahoma 286. Ute Mountain Ute Tribe determinations pursuant to section 237.
    [Show full text]
  • Federally Recognized Indian Tribes
    Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16.
    [Show full text]