DOCSLIB.ORG

Federally Recognized Indian Tribes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix C: Federally Recognized Indian Tribes The following tribal entities within the contiguous 48 states are recognized and eligible to receive services from the United States Bureau of Indian Affairs. For further information contact Bureau of Indian Affairs, Division of Tribal Government Services, 1849 C Street N.W., Washington, DC 20240; Telephone number (202) 208-7445.1 Figure C.1 shows the location of the Federally Recognized Tribes. 1. Absentee-Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma 2. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California 3. Ak Chin Indian Community of Papago Indians of the Maricopa, Ak Chin Reservation, Arizona 4. Alabama and Coushatta Tribes of Texas 5. Alabama-Quassarte Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma 6. Alturas Rancheria of Pit River Indians of California 7. Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 8. Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming 9. Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians of Maine 10. Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana 11. Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation, California 12. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians of the Bad River Reservation, Wisconsin 13. Bay Mills Indian Community of the Sault Ste. Marie Band of Chippewa Indians Bay Mills. Reservation, Michigan 14. Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 15. Big Lagoon Rancheria of Smith River Indians of California 1Federal Register, Vol. 61, No. 220, November 13, 1996. C–1 Figure C.1.—Locations of Federally Recognized Indian Tribes and Alaska Native Corporations. C–2 16. Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation, California 17. Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California 18. Big Valley Rancheria of Pomo and Pit River Indians of California 19. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian Reservation of Montana 20. Blue Lake Rancheria of California 21. Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California 22. Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California 23. Burns Paiute Tribe of the Burns Paiute Indian Colony of Oregon 24. Cabazon Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Cabazon Reservation, California 25. Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria, California 26. Caddo Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 27. Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation, California 28. Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria, California 29. Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation, California 30. Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of California: – Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reser- vation, California – Viejas (Baron Long) Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Viejas Reservation, California 31. Cayuga Nation of New York 32. Cedarville Rancheria of Northern Paiute Indians of California 33. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation, California 34. Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, California 35. Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma 36. Cheyenne–Arapahoe Tribes of Oklahoma 37. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River Reservation, South Dakota 38. Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma C–3 39. Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California 40. Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky Boy’s Reservation, Montana 41. Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana 42. Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma 43. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 44. Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California 45. Coast Indian Community of Yurok Indians of the Resighini Rancheria, California 46. Cocopah Tribe of Arizona 47. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of the Coeur d’Alene Reservation, Idaho 48. Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California 49. Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California 50. Comanche Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 51. Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana 52. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Washington 53. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation, Washington 54. Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians of Oregon 55. Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation, Nevada and Utah 56. Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon 57. Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon 58. Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation, Oregon 59. Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 60. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation of the Yakima Reservation, Washington 61. Coquille Tribe of Oregon 62. Cortina Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians of California 63. Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana 64. Covelo Indian Community of the Round Valley Reservation, California C–4 65. Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of Oregon 66. Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California 67. Creek Nation of Oklahoma 68. Crow Tribe of Montana 69. Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota 70. Cuyapaipe Community of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Cuyapaipe Reservation, California 71. Death Valley Timbi-Sha Shoshone Band of California 72. Delaware Tribe of Western Oklahoma 73. Devils Lake Sioux Tribe of the Devils Lake Sioux Reservation, North Dakota 74. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California 75. Duckwater Shoshone Tribe of the Duckwater Reservation, Nevada 76. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina 77. Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma 78. Elem Indian Colony of Pomo Indians of the Sulphur Bank Rancheria, California 79. Elk Valley Rancheria of Smith River Tolowa Indians of California 80. Ely Shoshone Tribe of Nevada 81. Enterprise Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 82. Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota 83. Forest County Potawatomi Community of Wisconsin Potawatomi Indians, Wisconsin 84. Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana 85. Fort Bidwell Indian Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort Bidwell Reservation, California 86. Fort Independence Indian Community of Paiute Indians of the Fort Independence Reservation, California 87. Fort McDermitt Paiute and Shoshone Tribes of the Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation, Nevada 88. Fort McDowell Mohave-Apache Indian Community of the Fort McDowell Indian Reservation, Arizona C–5 89. Fort Mojave Indian Tribe of Arizona 90. Fort Sill Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 91. Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation of Arizona 92. Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians of Michigan 93. Greenville Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California 94. Grindstone Indian Rancheria of Wintun-Wailaki Indians of California 95. Guidiville Rancheria of California 96. Hannahville Indian Community of Wisconsin Potawatomie Indians of Michigan 97. Havasupai Tribe of the Havasupai Reservation, Arizona 98. Hoh Indian Tribe of the Hoh Indian Reservation, Washington 99. Hoopa Valley Tribe of the Hoopa Valley Reservation, California 100. Hopi Tribe of Arizona 101. Hopland Band of Pomo Indians of the Hopland Rancheria, California 102. Houlton Band of Maliseet Indians of Maine 103. Hualapai Tribe of the Hualapai Indian Reservation, Arizona 104. Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and Cosmit Reservation, California 105. Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska 106. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma 107. Jackson Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California 108. Jamestown Klallam Tribe of Washington 109. Jamul Indian Village of California 110. Jicarilla Apache Tribe of the Jicarilla Apache Indian Reservation, New Mexico 111. Kaibab Band of Paiute Indians of the Kaibab Indian Reservation, Arizona 112. Kalspel Indian Community of the Kalspel Reservation, Washington 113. Karuk Tribe of California 114. Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria, California C–6 115. Kaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 116. Keweenaw Bay Indian Community of L’Anse and Ontonagon Bands of Chippewa Indians of the L’Anse Reservation, Michigan 117. Kialegee Tribal Town of the Creek Indian Nation of Oklahoma 118. Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas 119. Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma 120. Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas 121. Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma 122. Klamath Indian Tribe of Oregon 123. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 124. La Jolla Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the La Jolla Reservation, California 125. La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Indian Reservation, California 126. La Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Lac Courte Oreilles Reservation of Wisconsin 127. Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of the Lac du Flambeau Reservation of Wisconsin 128. Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan 129. Las Vegas Tribe of Paiute Indians of the Las Vegas Indian Colony, Nevada 130. Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Los Coyotes Reservation, California 131. Lovelock Paiute Tribe of the Lovelock Indian Colony, Nevada 132. Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower Brule Reservation, South Dakota 133. Lower Elwha Tribal Community of the Lower Elwha Reservation, Washington 134. Lower Sioux Indian Community of Minnesota Mdewakanton Sioux Indians of the Lower Sioux Reservation in Minnesota 135. Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation, Washington 136. Lytton Rancheria of California 137. Makah Indian Tribe of the Makah Indian Reservation, Washington C–7 138. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians of the Manchester-Point Arena
Recommended publications
  • Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot

    Tribal Relations and Consultation at Txdot

    Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT Draft Strategic Plan 2016 Archeological Studies Branch, Cultural Resources Management (CRM) Section, Environmental Affairs Division (ENV) Vision for Tribal Relations and Consultation at TxDOT The Texas Department of Transportation is a best-in-class agency that goes above and beyond the spirit of consultation to work collaboratively with federally recognized Native American tribes toward mutually beneficial outcomes during all levels of the transportation process. Mission of the Tribal Relations and Consultation Program: Build relationships and purposefully collaborate with tribal nations in the planning and implementation of TxDOT projects and programs. In working with tribal nations, TxDOT: . Recognizes the inherent sovereign status and reserved rights of tribes; . Practices and promotes cultural sensitivity when working with tribes; . Honors the spirit of various federal requirements and orders to consult with tribes; . Aims to go above and beyond current practices to foster trust and productivity; . Commits to providing meaningful and substantive consultation with tribes on transportation projects; and . Promotes collaborative consultation opportunities during planning and review processes within TXDOT. 2 Draft Tribal Relations and Consultation Strategic Plan 2016 Foreword Texas’ long and rich cultural history is rooted in the indigenous people who once inhabited the land. Tribal nations continue to have an inherent interest in the state’s natural and cultural resources. Today, the federal government recognizes tribes’ inherent sovereign status, a unique relationship that is embodied in the U.S. Constitution, treaties, court decisions, federal statutes and executive orders. As TxDOT builds a safe and reliable transportation system, the agency (on behalf of the Federal Highway Administration) consults with tribes on statewide transportation plans and projects with federal funding.
  • Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families Susie Van Kirk

    Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families Susie Van Kirk

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Susie Van Kirk Papers Special Collections 1-2013 Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families Susie Van Kirk Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk Part of the Genomics Commons Recommended Citation Van Kirk, Susie, "Brock, Lowry, Leon, Bailey, Woodward, Maple, Brett, Cripe and Cooper Families" (2013). Susie Van Kirk Papers. 8. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/svk/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Special Collections at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Susie Van Kirk Papers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Susie Van Kirk Historic Resources Consultant P.O Box 568 Bayside, CA 95524 [email protected] 707-822-6066 January 2013 BROCK, LOWRY, LEON, BAILEY, WOODWARD, MAPLE, BRETT, CRIPE AND COOPER FAMILIES Addendum, Feb. 2013 FE (16 Feb. 1894) Erick Thorsen and Yarnell Cooper have been brought from Orleans to Eureka charged with grand larceny in having killed a beef belonging to C.S. Hoffman and used it for food. FE (9 March 1894) Yarnell Cooper has been held to answer to charge of grand larceny [Thorsen released] FE (3 May 1895) Mrs. Thos. Brett, aged 21 years, died at Hoopa a few days since, of consumption. 1880 U.S. Census, Humboldt county, Redwood; Willow Creek precinct [Indian residents] 8. Jim, Capt., 40, Calif. 9. Mary, 30, wife 10. George, 12, son 11. Mary, 30 sister 12.
  • Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas

    Tonkawa Indians Before the Time of the Spanish Explorers, Native Americans Inhabited the Open Ranges and Woodlands of Texas

    Tonkawa Indians Before the time of the Spanish explorers, Native Americans inhabited the open ranges and woodlands of Texas. One group that made its mark in history is the Tonkawa Indians. These people were thought to have come to Texas as early as the seventeenth century. Tonkawa, a Waco Indian word, means, “they all stay together,” which eloquently describes this group of nomadic Indian tribes. There is scant archeological evidence of the Tonkawa people, and historians have several theories on the tribal structure and lifestyles of this group. Some believe the Tonkawa were actually a group of independent bands of Indians, which may have included the Sana, Toho, Tohaha, Cantona, and Cava Indians. In the early eighteenth century these bands of Indians were thought to have joined together to form Tonkawa Proper. There is some evidence that the Tonkawa actually came to Texas much earlier as one cohesive group of Tonkawa Indians that lived further north. These nomadic hunters lived in tepees made from buffalo hide, grass and other materials. Tepees allowed bands to easily pack their homes and move with the migrating herds of buffalo or to outrun their enemies. An elected tribal chief led each band of Tonkawa, and each band was composed of maternal clans. Unlike many societies that are patriarchal, the Tonkawa clan membership followed on the side of the mother. When a couple got married, the man would go live with his wife’s clan, and the children would become members of their mother’s clan as well. As a society that always stays together, the Tonkawa established a system that ensured all widows, widowers, and orphaned children were taken care of if their family members died.
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010

    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010

    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
  • A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In

    A Report on Indian Township Passamaquoddy Tribal Lands In

    A REPORT ON INDIAN TOWNSHIP PASSAMAQUODDY TRIBAL LANDS IN THE VICINITY OF PRINCETON, MAINE Anthony J. Kaliss 1971 Introduction to 1971 Printing Over two years have passed since I completed the research work for this report and during those years first one thing and ttan another prevented its final completion and printing. The main credit for the final preparation and printing goes to the Division of Indian Services of the Catholic Diocese of Portland and the American Civil Liberities Union of Maine. The Dioscese provided general assistance from its office staff headed by Louis Doyle and particular thanks is due to Erline Paul of Indian Island who did a really excellent job of typing more than 50 stencils of title abstracts, by their nature a real nuisance to type. The American Civil Liberities Union contrib­ uted greatly by undertaking to print the report Xtfhich will come to some 130 pages. Finally another excellent typist must be thanked and that is Edward Hinckley former Commissioner of Indian Affairs who also did up some 50 stencils It is my feeling that this report is more timely than ever. The Indian land problems have still not been resolved, but more and more concern is being expressed by Indians and non-Indians that something be done. Hopefully the appearance of this report at this time will help lead to some definite action whether in or out of the courts. Further research on Indian lands and trust funds remains to be done. The material, I believe, is available and it is my hope that this report will stimulate someone to undertake the necessary work.
  • FY 2018/19 Tribal Nation Grant Fund

    FY 2018/19 Tribal Nation Grant Fund

    FY 2018/19 Tribal Nation Grant Fund Disbursements Tribe Name Application Title Awarded Amount 1 Ione Band of Miwok Indians of California Economic Diversification & Community and Housing Development $ 400,000.00 2 Sherwood Valley Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Eastside Housing Development Project $ 400,000.00 3 Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Self Governance $ 400,000.00 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria Community Services $ 400,000.00 5 Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley (previously listed as the Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation) Indigenous Wellness $ 400,000.00 6 Big Sandy Rancheria of Western Mono Indians of California (previously listed as the Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California) Work Force Development and Housing $ 400,000.00 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Renewable Energy and Economic Development $ 400,000.00 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe (previously listed as the Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community of the Bishop Colony) Equipment Acquisition $ 400,000.00 9 Bridgeport Indian Colony (previously listed as the Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California) Generators and Forklift $ 400,000.00 10 Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Community Development $ 400,000.00 11 Cahuilla Band of Indians (previously listed as the Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation) Governmental Infrastructure Development and Training $ 400,000.00 12 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Economic and Community
  • Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway

    Lovelock-Cave-Back-Country-Byway

    Back Country Byways . An Invitation to Discover There is an axiom among seasoned travelers advising that the best way to get to know a new place is to get off the highway and visit the back roads, the side trails and the hidden, out-of-the-way corners where the true qualities wait to be discovered. The same axiom holds true for America’s public lands, the vast reaches of our nation that are all too often seen only from the windows of speeding cars or the tiny portholes of airliners. The Bureau of Land Management, America’s largest land managing agency, is providing an exciting opportunity for more Americans to get to know their lands by getting off the main roads for leisurely trips on a series of roads and trails being dedicated as Back Country Byways. The Back Country Byways Program, an outgrowth of the national Scenic Byways Program, is designed to encourage greater use of these existing back roads through greater public awareness. The system is BUREAUREAU OOFF LANDLAND MANMANAGEMENTGEMENT expected to expand to 100 roads when completed. In Nevada, each byway has a character and beauty of its own, taking travelers through scenery that is uniquely Nevadan, into historic areas that helped shape our state and near areas that have been largely untouched by man. They can see the multiple uses of their lands and come to a greater awareness of the need for the conservation and wise use of these resources. And all this can be accomplished at little cost to the taxpayer. Because the roads are already in place, only interpretive signs and limited facilities are needed to better serve the public.
  • PICH Awardee Impact Statements

    PICH Awardee Impact Statements

    PICH Awardee Impact Statements Background The Partnership to Improve Community Health (PICH) initiative funded 29 communities from FY2014 through FY2017 to reduce chronic disease risk factors. Awardees implemented evidence-based policy, system, and environmental interventions to improve nutrition and physical activity, reduce tobacco use and exposure, and strengthen community-clinical linkages. PICH awardee impact statements describe the short-term impacts of the PICH initiative. These impact statements were created using data from awardee Community Action Plans, awardee Progress Reports, and census data. All data were reviewed for clarity and potential duplicate reporting. Impact statements were created during two timeframes: 2016 and 2017. Each awardee has at least two impact statements; if there were additional data, additional impact statements were developed. Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Board, Inc. (Arizona) Nutrition As of September 2017, Fort Defiance Indian Hospital Board, Inc. increased access to healthy food and beverages for an estimated 59,838 Native American residents in Arizona. PICH staff supported the development of 23 farmers’ markets. To increase interest among vendors and address the misperception that farmers’ markets are for vendors who sell surplus vegetables at a low cost, PICH staff set up trainings and recruited farmers, growers, and partners to participate. Community Health Workers (CHWs) were used to find partners, organize markets, set schedules, and get community input and support. PICH staff conducted surveys at farmers’ markets and each market included a cultural component coupled with a public health component consisting of healthy living messages, eating/eating healthy, and taking care of oneself. They also invited local health related resources to participate and they assisted with outreach, public information, educations, and demonstrations.
  • Agenda Item – Staff Report

    Agenda Item – Staff Report

    AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed.
  • Indian Country Welcome To

    Indian Country Welcome To

    Travel Guide To OREGON Indian Country Welcome to OREGON Indian Country he members of Oregon’s nine federally recognized Ttribes and Travel Oregon invite you to explore our diverse cultures in what is today the state of Oregon. Hundreds of centuries before Lewis & Clark laid eyes on the Pacific Ocean, native peoples lived here – they explored; hunted, gathered and fished; passed along the ancestral ways and observed the ancient rites. The many tribes that once called this land home developed distinct lifestyles and traditions that were passed down generation to generation. Today these traditions are still practiced by our people, and visitors have a special opportunity to experience our unique cultures and distinct histories – a rare glimpse of ancient civilizations that have survived since the beginning of time. You’ll also discover that our rich heritage is being honored alongside new enterprises and technologies that will carry our people forward for centuries to come. The following pages highlight a few of the many attractions available on and around our tribal centers. We encourage you to visit our award-winning native museums and heritage centers and to experience our powwows and cultural events. (You can learn more about scheduled powwows at www.traveloregon.com/powwow.) We hope you’ll also take time to appreciate the natural wonders that make Oregon such an enchanting place to visit – the same mountains, coastline, rivers and valleys that have always provided for our people. Few places in the world offer such a diversity of landscapes, wildlife and culture within such a short drive. Many visitors may choose to visit all nine of Oregon’s federally recognized tribes.
  • Tribal Casino Locations Listed Alphabetical

    Tribal Casino Locations Listed Alphabetical

    Tribal Casino Locations Alphabetical by Casino Updated: December 29, 2008 Casino Name Tribe County 1 Agua Caliente Casino Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Riverside 2 Augustine Casino Augustine Band of Mission Indians Riverside 3 Barona Valley Ranch Resort Barona Group of Mission Indians San Diego 4 Bear River Casino Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Humboldt Rancheria 5 Black Bart Casino Sherwood Valley Rancheria Mendocino 6 Black Oak Casino Tuolumne Band of Me-Wuk Indians Tuolumne 7 Blue Lake Casino Blue Lake Rancheria Humboldt 8 Cache Creek Casino Resort Rumsey Indian Rancheria Yolo 9 Cahuilla Creek Casino Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Riverside 10 Casino Pauma Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians San Diego 11 Cher-Ae-Heights Casino Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Humboldt 12 Chicken Ranch Bingo & Casino Chicken Ranch Rancheria Tuolumne 13 Chukchansi Gold Resort & Casino Chukchansi Indians (Picayune Rancheria of Madera the Chukchansi Indians) 14 Chumash Casino Resort Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Indians Santa Barbara 15 Colusa Casino Resort Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians (Colusa Colusa Indian Community) 16 Desert Rose Casino Alturas Rancheria Modoc 17 Diamond Mountain Casino Susanville Indian Rancheria Lassen 18 Eagle Mountain Casino Tule River Indian Tribe Tulare 19 Elk Valley Casino Elk Valley Rancheria Del Norte 20 Fantasy Springs Casino Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Riverside 21 Feather Falls Casino Mooretown Rancheria Butte 22 Gold Country Casino Berry Creek Rancheria Butte 23 Golden Acorn Casino Campo Band of
  • County Profile

    County Profile

    FY 2020-21 PROPOSED BUDGET SECTION B:PROFILE GOVERNANCE Assessor County Counsel Auditor-Controller Human Resources Board of Supervisors Measure Z Clerk-Recorder Other Funds County Admin. Office Treasurer-Tax Collector Population County Comparison Education Infrastructure Employment DEMOGRAPHICS Geography Located on the far North Coast of California, 200 miles north of San Francisco and about 50 miles south of the southern Oregon border, Humboldt County is situated along the Pacific coast in Northern California’s rugged Coastal (Mountain) Ranges, bordered on the north SCENERY by Del Norte County, on the east by Siskiyou and Trinity counties, on the south by Mendocino County and on the west by the Pacific Ocean. The climate is ideal for growth The county encompasses 2.3 million acres, 80 percent of which is of the world’s tallest tree - the forestlands, protected redwoods and recreational areas. A densely coastal redwood. Though these forested, mountainous, rural county with about 110 miles of coastline, trees are found from southern more than any other county in the state, Humboldt contains over forty Oregon to the Big Sur area of percent of all remaining old growth Coast Redwood forests, the vast California, Humboldt County majority of which is protected or strictly conserved within dozens of contains the most impressive national, state, and local forests and parks, totaling approximately collection of Sequoia 680,000 acres (over 1,000 square miles). Humboldt’s highest point is sempervirens. The county is Salmon Mountain at 6,962 feet. Its lowest point is located in Samoa at home to Redwood National 20 feet. Humboldt Bay, California’s second largest natural bay, is the and State Parks, Humboldt only deep water port between San Francisco and Coos Bay, Oregon, Redwoods State Park (The and is located on the coast at the midpoint of the county.