DOCSLIB.ORG

California-Nevada Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Research Guides for both historic and modern Native Communities relating to records held at the National Archives California Nevada Introduction Page Introduction Page Historic Native Communities Historic Native Communities Modern Native Communities Modern Native Communities Sample Document Beginning of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the U.S. Government and the Kahwea, San Luis Rey, and Cocomcahra Indians. Signed at the Village of Temecula, California, 1/5/1852. National Archives. https://catalog.archives.gov/id/55030733 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities California Native Communities To perform a search of more general records of California’s Native People in the National Archives Online Catalog, use Advanced Search. Enter California in the search box and 75 in the Record Group box (Bureau of Indian Affairs). There are several great resources available for general information and material for kids about the Native People of California, such as the Native Languages and National Museum of the American Indian websites. Type California into the main search box for both. Related state agencies and universities may also hold records or information about these communities. Examples might include the California State Archives, the Online Archive of California, and the University of California Santa Barbara Native American Collections. Historic California Native Communities Federally Recognized Native Communities in California (2018) Sample Document Map of Selected Site for Indian Reservation in Mendocino County, California, 7/30/1856. National Archives: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/50926106 National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic California Native Communities For a map of historic language areas in California, see Native Languages. Instructions: Slashes separate search terms and phrases. Copy the exact phrase into the Online Catalog, including quotation marks, if present. Always be willing to experiment with search terms. Quoted phrases return very different results than non-quoted phrases. Using the geographic location or most relevant word or words from the tribal name, with one of the following words may also prove beneficial: Indian (most useful), Native, Tribe, Reservation, or Village. Be sure to link to modern tribal pages. They contain current information and more possible search terms. Historic Suggested Online Catalog Search Associated Federally Recognized Tribal Communities Tribes terms 2018 Achumawi "Pit River Indians" / "Pitt River Indians" / California: "Rogue River War" Alturas Indian Rancheria, California Pit River Tribe, California Ahwahnechee Yosemite Indian The original inhabitants of Yosemite Valley, California. Closely related to the Northern Paiute, Mono, and Southern Sierra Miwok. At least one group is seeking federal recognition. Atsugewi "Pit River Tribe" / "Pit River Indians" / California: "Pitt River Indians" / "Rogue River War" Pit River Tribe, California Susanville Indian Rancheria, California Bay Miwok Miwok Descendant groups are living in the San Francisco Bay area, includig the unrecognized Muwekma Ohlone Tribe. They claim to descend from Missions Dolores, Santa Clara and San Jose populations. Cahuilla Cahuilla California: Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians, California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, California Cahuilla Band of Indians Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians of the Los Coyotes Reservation Morongo Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Morongo Reservation Ramona Band of Cahuilla, California Santa Rosa Band of Cahuilla Indians, California Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians, California Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, California Chemehuevi Chemehuevi Arizona and California: Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and California California: Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation, California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, California Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation, California Morongo Band of Mission Indians, California Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, California Twenty-Nine Palms Band of Mission Indians of California Chilula Hoopa / Hupa / Chilula California: Hoopa Valley Tribe, California National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic Suggested Online Catalog Search Associated Federally Recognized Tribal Communities Tribes terms 2018 Chimariko Shasta Indian / Hoopa / Hupa / "Quartz California: Valley Reservation" Hoopa Valley Tribe, California Quartz Valley Indian Community of the Quartz Valley Reservation of California Chumash Chumash California: Santa Ynez Band of Chumash Mission Indians of the Santa Ynez Reservation, California Tejon Indian Tribe Coast Miwok Miwok / "Graton Rancheria" California: Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, California Cocopah Cocopah Arizona: Cocopah Tribe of Arizona (See Home Page – Desert Southwest) Cupeno Cupeno NOT "Puerto Rican" / "Pala California: Band" / "Morongo Band" / "Los Coyotes Los Coyotes Band of Cahuilla and Cupeno Indians, Band" California Morongo Band of Mission Indians, California Pala Band of Mission Indians Diegueno Diegueno / Kumeyaay / Kamia Indian California: (Kumeyaay) Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation, California Capitan Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of California Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians, California Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel, California Inaja Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Inaja and Cosmit Reservation, California Jamul Indian Village of California La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the La Posta Indian Reservation, California Manzanita Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Manzanita Reservation, California Mesa Grande Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Mesa Grande Reservation, California San Pasqual Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of California Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation The Mount Laguna Band of Kwaaymii Indians is no longer Federally recognized. Their reservation passed into private hands in 1947, however, there are federal records prior to that time. Esselen No Federal Government records are A group of Esselen in Monterey County, California claim available. descendency. Gabrielino Gabrielino / Tongva The state of California recognized both the Gabrielino-Tongva (Tongva) Tribe and the Fernandino-Tongva Tribe in 1994. They are not Federally Recognized, however there are records at the National Archives. Halchidhoma "Maricopa Indian" / "Salt River" Indian Arizona: National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic Suggested Online Catalog Search Associated Federally Recognized Tribal Communities Tribes terms 2018 Gila River Indian Community of the Gila River Indian Reservation, Arizona (See Home Page – Desert Southwest) Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community of the Salt River Reservation, Arizona (See Home Page – Desert Southwest) Hupa Hupa / Hoopa NOT Defense California: Hoopa Valley Tribe, California Juaneno "Juaneno Band" Not recognized by the Federal Government, however they are recognized by the State of California. Also known as Acjachemen. Associated with Mission San Capistrano. Karok Karok NOT State AND NOT War / Karuk California: Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria, California Karuk Tribe Quartz Valley Indian Community of the Quartz Valley Reservation of California Kashaya Kashia California: Kashia Band of Pomo Indians of the Stewarts Point Rancheria, California Kato (Cahto) "Cahto Indian" California: Cahto Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Round Valley Indian Tribes, Round Valley Reservation, California Kawaiisu Kawaiisu NOT "Puerto Rican" / "Tule California: River" Indian Tule River Indian Tribe of the Tule River Reservation, California Kitanemuk "Tejon Indian" / "Tule River" Indian California: Tejon Indian Tribe Tule River Indian Tribe of the Tule River Reservation, California Klamath "Klamath Indian" / "Quartz Valley" California: Quartz Valley Indian Community of the Quartz Valley Reservation of California Oregon: Klamath Tribes (See Home Page – Pacific Northwest) Konkow "Chico Rancheria" California: (Maidu) Mechoopda Indian Tribe of Chico Rancheria, California Lake Miwok Miwok NOT Census / "Middletown California: Rancheria" Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Lassik No Federal Government records are Decimated by the Bald Hills War in the 1860s. Classified with available. the Eel River Athabascan group of communities in California (Wailaki, Lassik, Nongatl, and Sinkyone). National Archives Native Communities Research Guides. https://www.archives.gov/education/native-communities Historic Suggested Online Catalog Search Associated Federally Recognized Tribal Communities Tribes terms 2018 Luiseno Luiseno Indian California: La Jolla Band of Luiseno Indians, California Pala Band of Mission Indians Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation, California Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pechanga Reservation, California Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation, California Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, California Maidu Maidu Indian California: Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Enterprise Rancheria
Recommended publications
  • Yosemite National Park Visitor Study: Winter 2008

    Yosemite National Park Visitor Study: Winter 2008

    Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 Social Science Program National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Visitor Study Winter 2008 Park Studies Unit Visitor Services Project Report 198 October 2008 Yen Le Eleonora Papadogiannaki Nancy Holmes Steven J. Hollenhorst Dr. Yen Le is VSP Assistant Director, Eleonora Papadogiannaki and Nancy Holmes are Research Assistants with the Visitor Services Project and Dr. Steven Hollenhorst is the Director of the Park Studies Unit, Department of Conservation Social Sciences, University of Idaho. We thank Jennifer Morse, Paul Reyes, Pixie Siebe, and the staff of Yosemite National Park for assisting with the survey, and David Vollmer for his technical assistance. Yosemite National Park – VSP Visitor Study February 2–10, 2008 Visitor Services Project Yosemite National Park Report Summary • This report describes the results of a visitor study at Yosemite National Park during February 2-10, 2008. A total of 938 questionnaires were distributed to visitor groups. Of those, 563 questionnaires were returned, resulting in a 60% response rate. • This report profiles a systematic random sample of Yosemite National Park. Most results are presented in graphs and frequency tables. Summaries of visitor comments are included in the report and complete comments are included in the Visitor Comments Appendix. • Fifty percent of visitor groups were in groups of two and 25% were in groups of three or four. Sixty percent of visitor groups were in family groups.
  • Indian Cri'm,Inal Justice

    Indian Cri'm,Inal Justice

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. 1 I . ~ f .:.- IS~?3 INDIAN CRI'M,INAL JUSTICE 11\ PROG;RAM',"::llISPLAY . ,',' 'i\ ',,.' " ,~,~,} '~" .. ',:f,;< .~ i ,,'; , '" r' ,..... ....... .,r___ 74 "'" ~ ..- ..... ~~~- :":~\ i. " ". U.S. DE P ----''''---£iT _,__ .._~.,~~"ftjlX.£~~I.,;.,..,;tI ... ~:~~~",­ TERIOR BURE AIRS DIVISION OF _--:- .... ~~.;a-NT SERVICES J .... This Reservation criminal justice display is designed to provide information we consider pertinent, to those concerned with Indian criminal justice systems. It is not as complete as we would like it to be since reservation criminal justice is extremely complex and ever changing, to provide all the information necessary to explain the reservation criminal justice system would require a document far more exten::'.J.:ve than this. This publication will undoubtedly change many times in the near future as Indian communities are ever changing and dynamic in their efforts to implement the concept of self-determination and to upgrade their community criminal justice systems. We would like to thank all those persons who contributed to this publication and my special appreciation to Mr. James Cooper, Acting Director of the U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center, Mr •. James Fail and his staff for their excellent work in compiling this information. Chief, Division of Law Enforcement Services ______ ~ __ ---------=.~'~r--~----~w~___ ------------------------------------~'=~--------------~--------~. ~~------ I' - .. Bureau of Indian Affairs Division of Law Enforcement Services U.S. Indian Police Training and Research Center Research and Statistical Unit S.UMM.ARY. ~L JUSTICE PROGRAM DISPLAY - JULY 1974 It appears from the attached document that the United States and/or Indian tribes have primary criminal and/or civil jurisdiction on 121 Indian reservations assigned administratively to 60 Agencies in 11 Areas, or the equivalent.
  • Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010

    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010

    Federally Recognized Tribes in California by the Department of Interior/Bureau of Indian Affairs October 1, 2010 Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of the Agua Caliente Indian Reservation Alturas Indian Rancheria Augustine Band of Cahuilla Indians (formerly the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Augustine Reservation) Barona Group of Capitan Grande Band of Mission Indians of the Barona Reservation Bear River Band of the Rohnerville Rancheria Berry Creek Rancheria of Maidu Indians of California Big Lagoon Rancheria Big Pine Band of Owens Valley Paiute Shoshone Indians of the Big Pine Reservation Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians of the Big Valley Rancheria Blue Lake Rancheria Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony of California Buena Vista Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cabazon Band of Mission Indians Cachil DeHe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community of the Colusa Rancheria Cahto Indian Tribe of the Laytonville Rancheria Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians of the Cahuilla Reservation California Valley Miwok Tribe Campo Band of Diegueno Mission Indians of the Campo Indian Reservation Cedarville Rancheria Chemehuevi Indian Tribe of the Chemehuevi Reservation Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community of the Trinidad Rancheria Chicken Ranch Rancheria of Me-Wuk Indians of California Cloverdale Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California Cold Springs Rancheria of Mono Indians of California Colorado River Indian Tribes of the Colorado River Indian Reservation, Arizona and
  • Sec 05 11 Tribal and Cultural Resources

    Sec 05 11 Tribal and Cultural Resources

    Tribal and Cultural Resources 5.11 TRIBAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.11.1 PURPOSE This section identifies existing cultural (including historic and archeological resources), paleontological and tribal resources within the Study Area, and provides an analysis of potential impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan Update. Potential impacts are identified and mitigation measures to address potentially significant impacts are recommended, as necessary. This section is primarily based upon the Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources Technical Report for the Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan Update, Rancho Santa Margarita, Orange County, California (Cultural Study), and the Paleontological Resources Impact Assessment Report for the Rancho Santa Margarita General Plan Update, Orange County, California (Paleontological Assessment), both prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) and dated April 2019; refer to Appendix F, Cultural/ Paleontological Resources Assessment. 5.11.2 EXISTING REGULATORY SETTING Numerous laws and regulations require Federal, State, and local agencies to consider the effects a project may have on cultural resources. These laws and regulations establish a process for compliance, define the responsibilities of the various agencies proposing the action, and prescribe the relationship among other involved agencies (i.e., State Historic Preservation Office and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation). The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended, the California Environmental
  • BAYLANDS & CREEKS South San Francisco

    BAYLANDS & CREEKS South San Francisco

    Oak_Mus_Baylands_SideA_6_7_05.pdf 6/14/2005 11:52:36 AM M12 M10 M27 M10A 121°00'00" M28 R1 For adjoining area see Creek & Watershed Map of Fremont & Vicinity 37°30' 37°30' 1 1- Dumbarton Pt. M11 - R1 M26 N Fremont e A in rr reek L ( o te C L y alien a o C L g a Agua Fria Creek in u d gu e n e A Green Point M a o N l w - a R2 ry 1 C L r e a M8 e g k u ) M7 n SF2 a R3 e F L Lin in D e M6 e in E L Creek A22 Toroges Slou M1 gh C ine Ravenswood L Slough M5 Open Space e ra Preserve lb A Cooley Landing L i A23 Coyote Creek Lagoon n M3 e M2 C M4 e B Palo Alto Lin d Baylands Nature Mu Preserve S East Palo Alto loug A21 h Calaveras Point A19 e B Station A20 Lin C see For adjoining area oy Island ote Sand Point e A Lucy Evans Lin Baylands Nature Creek Interpretive Center Newby Island A9 San Knapp F Map of Milpitas & North San Jose Creek & Watershed ra Hooks Island n Tract c A i l s Palo Alto v A17 q i ui s to Creek Baylands Nature A6 o A14 A15 Preserve h g G u u a o Milpitas l Long Point d a S A10 A18 l u d p Creek l A3N e e i f Creek & Watershed Map of Palo Alto & Vicinity Creek & Watershed Calera y A16 Berryessa a M M n A1 A13 a i h A11 l San Jose / Santa Clara s g la a u o Don Edwards San Francisco Bay rd Water Pollution Control Plant B l h S g Creek d u National Wildlife Refuge o ew lo lo Vi F S Environmental Education Center .
  • California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A

    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A

    California Indian Food and Culture PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Written and Designed by Nicole Mullen Contributors: Ira Jacknis, Barbara Takiguchi, and Liberty Winn. Sources Consulted The former exhibition: Food in California Indian Culture at the Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology. Ortiz, Beverly, as told by Julia Parker. It Will Live Forever. Heyday Books, Berkeley, CA 1991. Jacknis, Ira. Food in California Indian Culture. Hearst Museum Publications, Berkeley, CA, 2004. Copyright © 2003. Phoebe A. Hearst Museum of Anthropology and the Regents of the University of California, Berkeley. All Rights Reserved. PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Table of Contents 1. Glossary 2. Topics of Discussion for Lessons 3. Map of California Cultural Areas 4. General Overview of California Indians 5. Plants and Plant Processing 6. Animals and Hunting 7. Food from the Sea and Fishing 8. Insects 9. Beverages 10. Salt 11. Drying Foods 12. Earth Ovens 13. Serving Utensils 14. Food Storage 15. Feasts 16. Children 17. California Indian Myths 18. Review Questions and Activities PHOEBE A. HEARST MUSEUM OF ANTHROPOLOGY Glossary basin an open, shallow, usually round container used for holding liquids carbohydrate Carbohydrates are found in foods like pasta, cereals, breads, rice and potatoes, and serve as a major energy source in the diet. Central Valley The Central Valley lies between the Coast Mountain Ranges and the Sierra Nevada Mountain Ranges. It has two major river systems, the Sacramento and the San Joaquin. Much of it is flat, and looks like a broad, open plain. It forms the largest and most important farming area in California and produces a great variety of crops.
  • Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance

    Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance

    [email protected] Enrollment Update News February 2012 Proposed Changes in the Tribal Enrollment Ordinance In October 2011, the Bishop Tribal Council held the 1st of a series of Pub- lic Hearings regarding proposed changes in the enrollment ordinance. The pro- posed changes would be to amend the ordinance to add new criteria such as: blood quantum, a residency clause, and having a contin- ual generational enrollment of descendents. Question: How did we arrive at Each meeting scheduled has discussed a “proposing” a blood quantum different topic. The most recent meeting on Janu- or enrollment changes? ary 25, 2012, the Bishop Tribal Council had invited On December 17, 2009 a tribal ENROLLMENT survey was taken asking if COMMITTEE representatives from the Bureau of Indian Affairs Tribal members would like to in Sacramento, California to give a presentation include a blood quantum in the LAURINE NAPOLES and answer any questions regarding blood quan- tum and when it is used or if it is still used. The current Tribal Enrollment Ordi- RUTH CHAVEZ nance. (134 people responded) meeting with the Bureau of Indian Affairs was in- PATTY MANRIQUEZ This lead to proposed changes formative for both the Enrollment Committee and and public hearings. GERALD HOWARD the community. ROBIN HOWARD The importance of these Public Hearings is for the community to become informed and be involved in the decision making process. Hopefully, the Enrollment Committee and Department can answer some ENROLLMENT DEPARTMENT of the misconceptions that have been mentioned during the Public Hearings. (i.e., GERTRUDE BROWN, We have members coming out of the “wood works”.
  • Agenda Item – Staff Report

    Agenda Item – Staff Report

    AGENDA ITEM – STAFF REPORT TO: HONORABLE CHAIRPERSON AND COMMISSIONERS FROM: JEFFREY O’NEAL, AICP, CITY PLANNER SUBJECT: APPLICATION NO. 20-23, THE VALLEY AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS, LLC COMMERCIAL CANNABIS PROJECT DATE: DECEMBER 29, 2020 ISSUE In the matter of Application No. 20-23, the Valley Agricultural Holdings LLC project, shall the Planning Commission: 1. Make a determination pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, make a determination of General Plan consistency for the disposal of real property, and approve a conditional use permit; and 2. Make recommendations to the City Council regarding a general plan amendment, rezone, and development agreement? BACKGROUND The State of California’s Medical and Adult Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) is the primary statute that regulates personal, medicinal, and commercial cannabis activity in the state. In addition to MAUCRSA, Chapters 8.37 (Commercial Cannabis Businesses) and 17.99 (Commercial Cannabis Overly District) of the Mendota Municipal Code (MMC) provide regulations applicable to non-personal cannabis activities at the local level. Pursuant to these local regulations, an applicant wishing to undertake commercial cannabis activities must meet certain location criteria, receive approval of a conditional use permit, and enter into a development agreement with the City. Dating to early 2019, the City has been in discussions with various entities regarding development of a commercial cannabis facility on a portion of a City-owned parcel (APN 013-030-68ST) adjacent to the City’s wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). In October 2019, the City entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC. On October 13, 2020 the Planning Department received an application from Valley Agricultural Holdings, LLC requesting a variety of entitlements and actions to facilitate the construction and operation of a commercial cannabis facility as discussed.
  • AFFIDAVIT in SUPPORT of SEARCH WARRANT 2 3 I, Charles Turner, Being Duly Sworn Upon Penalty of Perjury, Depose and State That: 4 1

    AFFIDAVIT in SUPPORT of SEARCH WARRANT 2 3 I, Charles Turner, Being Duly Sworn Upon Penalty of Perjury, Depose and State That: 4 1

    1 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF SEARCH WARRANT 2 3 I, Charles Turner, being duly sworn upon penalty of perjury, depose and state that: 4 1. I have been employed since February 2001 as a Special Agent by the United States Department 5 of Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Office of Justice Services, Division of Drug Enforcement. Within 6 the meaning of 25 U.S.C. § 2803, I am an officer who is empowered by law to conduct investigations, 7 make arrests, and seize property for violations of Title 18, United States Code and Title 21, United 8 States Code. I am assigned to the Western Nevada Agency Office and have been so assigned since 9 March of 2014. I am currently assigned to investigate drug trafficking organizations as they affect 10 Indian Country in the northern Nevada and California areas. 11 I. PREMISES TO BE SEARCHED 12 2. This affidavit is submitted in support of a request under F.R.Crim.P. 41 for the issuance of three 13 search warrants against the following: (1) the premises within the enclosed fenced area surrounding the 14 Alturas Rancheria Event Center and workshop building located at 901 County Road 56, Alturas, 15 California. This marijuana growing facility is located at Latitude 41° 28.642' North and Longitude 120° 16 31.513' West. An aerial photograph of the premises within the enclosed fence area to be searched is 17 attached hereto as part of Attachment A-1. This first site to be searched will sometimes be referred to 18 herein as the "Alturas Rancheria Event Center Site"; (2) the premises within the enclosed fenced area 19 surrounding the long tan building and white greenhouses, and other facilities used to manufacture 20 marijuana plants at the Pit River XL Ranch Reservation located on the west side of the highway near 21 29310 U.S.
  • Drought and Equity in California

    Drought and Equity in California

    Drought and Equity in California Laura Feinstein, Rapichan Phurisamban, Amanda Ford, Christine Tyler, Ayana Crawford January 2017 Drought and Equity in California January 2017 Lead Authors Laura Feinstein, Senior Research Associate, Pacific Institute Rapichan Phurisamban, Research Associate, Pacific Institute Amanda Ford, Coalition Coordinator, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Christine Tyler, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Ayana Crawford, Water Policy Leadership Intern, Pacific Institute Drought and Equity Advisory Committee and Contributing Authors The Drought and Equity Advisory Committee members acted as contributing authors, but all final editorial decisions were made by lead authors. Sara Aminzadeh, Executive Director, California Coastkeeper Alliance Colin Bailey, Executive Director, Environmental Justice Coalition for Water Carolina Balazs, Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley Wendy Broley, Staff Engineer, California Urban Water Agencies Amanda Fencl, PhD Student, University of California, Davis Center for Environmental Policy and Behavior Kelsey Hinton, Program Associate, Community Water Center Gita Kapahi, Director, Office of Public Participation, State Water Resources Control Board Brittani Orona, Environmental Justice and Tribal Affairs Specialist and Native American Studies Doctoral Student, University of California, Davis Brian Pompeii, Lecturer, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Tim Sloane, Executive Director, Institute for Fisheries Resources ISBN-978-1-893790-76-6 © 2017 Pacific Institute. All rights reserved. Pacific Institute 654 13th Street, Preservation Park Oakland, California 94612 Phone: 510.251.1600 | Facsimile: 510.251.2203 www.pacinst.org Cover Photos: Clockwise from top left: NNehring, Debargh, Yykkaa, Marilyn Nieves Designer: Bryan Kring, Kring Design Studio Drought and Equity in California I ABOUT THE PACIFIC INSTITUTE The Pacific Institute envisions a world in which society, the economy, and the environment have the water they need to thrive now and in the future.
  • California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009

    California Gambling Control Commission Revenue Sharing Trust Fund Recipients March 4, 2009

    CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 1 Alturas Indian Rancheria Desert Rose Casino Alturas 2 Bear River Band of Rohnerville Rancheria Bear River Casino Loleta 3 Benton Paiute Reservation N/A Benton 4 Big Lagoon Rancheria N/A Trinidad 5 Big Pine Reservation N/A Big Pine 6 Big Sandy Rancheria Mono Wind Casino Auberry Konocti Vista 7 Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians Lakeport Casino Paiute Palace 8 Bishop Paiute Tribe Bishop Casino 9 Bridgeport Paiute Indian Colony N/A Bridgeport 10 Buena Vista Rancheria N/A Ione 11 Cahto Indian Tribe of Laytonville Rancheria Red Fox Casino Laytonville Cahuilla Creek 12 Cahuilla Band of Mission Indians Anza Casino 13 California Valley Miwok Tribe N/A Stockton 14 Cedarville Rancheria N/A Alturas Havasu Landing 15 Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Havasu Lake Resort and Casino Cher-Ae-Heights 16 Cher-Ae Heights Indian Community Trinidad Casino Chicken Ranch 17 Chicken Ranch Rancheria Jamestown Bingo and Casino 18 Cloverdale Rancheria N/A Cloverdale 19 Cold Springs Rancheria N/A Tollhouse CALIFORNIA GAMBLING CONTROL COMMISSION REVENUE SHARING TRUST FUND RECIPIENTS MARCH 4, 2009 TRIBE CASINO LOCATION 20 Colorado River Indian Tribes N/A Parker, AZ 1 21 Cortina Rancheria N/A Williams Coyote Valley 22 Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians Redwood Valley Shodakai Casino 23 Death Valley Timba-Sha Shoshone Tribe N/A Death Valley 24 Elem Indian Colony N/A Clearlake Oaks 25 Elk Valley Rancheria Elk Valley Casino Crescent City 26 Enterprise Rancheria N/A Oroville
  • Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians

    Plants Used in Basketry by the California Indians

    PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS BY RUTH EARL MERRILL PLANTS USED IN BASKETRY BY THE CALIFORNIA INDIANS RUTH EARL MERRILL INTRODUCTION In undertaking, as a study in economic botany, a tabulation of all the plants used by the California Indians, I found it advisable to limit myself, for the time being, to a particular form of use of plants. Basketry was chosen on account of the availability of material in the University's Anthropological Museum. Appreciation is due the mem- bers of the departments of Botany and Anthropology for criticism and suggestions, especially to Drs. H. M. Hall and A. L. Kroeber, under whose direction the study was carried out; to Miss Harriet A. Walker of the University Herbarium, and Mr. E. W. Gifford, Asso- ciate Curator of the Museum of Anthropology, without whose interest and cooperation the identification of baskets and basketry materials would have been impossible; and to Dr. H. I. Priestley, of the Ban- croft Library, whose translation of Pedro Fages' Voyages greatly facilitated literary research. Purpose of the sttudy.-There is perhaps no phase of American Indian culture which is better known, at least outside strictly anthro- pological circles, than basketry. Indian baskets are not only concrete, durable, and easily handled, but also beautiful, and may serve a variety of purposes beyond mere ornament in the civilized household. Hence they are to be found in. our homes as well as our museums, and much has been written about the art from both the scientific and the popular standpoints. To these statements, California, where American basketry.