DOCSLIB.ORG

MOON VILLAGE Conceptual Design of a Lunar Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MOON VILLAGE Conceptual Design of a Lunar Habitat CDF STUDY REPORT MOON VILLAGE Conceptual Design of a Lunar Habitat CDF-202(A) Issue 1.1 September 2020 Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 1 of 185 CDF Study Report Moon Village Conceptual Design of a Lunar Habitat ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 2 of 185 This study is based on the ESA CDF Open Concurrent Design Tool (OCDT), which is a community software tool released under ESA licence. All rights reserved. Further information and/or additional copies of the report can be requested from: A. Makaya ESA/ESTEC/TEC-MSP Postbus 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Tel: +31-(0)71-5653721 Fax: [email protected] For further information on the Concurrent Design Facility please contact: I.Roma ESA/ESTEC/TEC-SYE Postbus 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Tel: +31-(0)71-5658453 Fax: +31-(0)71-5656024 [email protected] FRONT COVER Study Logo showing Stylised Lunar Habitats with Earth in the background ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 3 of 185 STUDY TEAM This study was performed in the ESTEC Concurrent Design Facility (CDF) by the following interdisciplinary team: TEAM LEADER R. Biesbroek, TEC-SYE ADVANCED H. Lakk, TEC-SF POWER K. Stephenson, CONCEPTS A. Barco, TEC-EPM LIFE SUPPORT B. Lamaze, TEC-MMG RADIATION M. Vuolo, M. Holmberg, TEC-EPS MISSION M. Landgraf, STRUCTURES D. de Wilde, TEC-MSS ARCHITECTURE N. Gollins, HRE-S MECHANISMS J. Smith, SYSTEMS D. Binns, P. Zaltron, D. Brandao, TEC-SYE T. Adam, TEC-MSM THERMAL P. Hager, M. Solyga, C. Buti, TEC-MTT Under the responsibility of: A. Makaya, TEC-MSP Study Manager P. Messina, DG-SM, Customer With the technical contribution of: O. Dubois-Matra, TEC-SAG, Guidance Navigation and Control A. Cowley, HRE-XE, In-Situ Resource Utilisation C. Mooney, TEC-QEE, Safety Materials M. Portaluppi, TEC-QEE, Safety Materials M. Arnhof, External, Crew Accommodation D. Inocente, SOM (External) C. Koop, SOM (External) G. Petrov, SOM (External) J. Hoffman, MIT (External) ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 4 of 185 The following people attended as observers: M. Khan, OPS-GFA, Mission Analysis H. Ertel, TEC-XE A. Kapoglou, HRE-S B. Rich, TEC-SF E. Sefton-Nash, SCI-SC A. Lill, TEC-SWG M. McCaughrean, SCI-A J. Carpenter, HRE-S J. Alves, HRE-X The editing and compilation of this report has been provided by: A. Pickering, TEC-SYE, Technical Author ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 5 of 185 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 9 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Objective ................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Scope .................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Document Structure ............................................................................................. 10 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................... 11 2.1 Study Flow ............................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Requirements and Design Drivers ........................................................................ 11 2.3 Mission ................................................................................................................. 12 2.4 Technical Conclusions and Options..................................................................... 16 3 SYSTEMS ............................................................................................. 17 3.1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Background ........................................................................................................... 17 3.2.1 ESA Moon Village Concept ............................................................................. 17 3.2.2 Previous Work ................................................................................................. 17 3.2.3 ESA-SOM-MIT Proposed Habitat Design ..................................................... 19 3.3 System Requirements and Design Drivers .......................................................... 25 3.4 Mission System Architecture ............................................................................... 26 3.4.1 Concept of Operations ................................................................................... 26 3.4.2 Mission Components ..................................................................................... 29 3.4.3 Mission Categories and Options .................................................................... 30 3.5 System Assumptions and Trade-Offs .................................................................. 33 3.5.1 Assumptions ................................................................................................... 33 3.5.2 Lander Sizing ................................................................................................. 33 3.5.3 Tug Sizing ....................................................................................................... 37 3.5.4 Launch Scenarios ........................................................................................... 38 3.5.5 Habitat Radiation Shielding Trade-Off ......................................................... 44 3.6 Baseline Solution .................................................................................................. 46 3.6.1 Habitat Overview ........................................................................................... 46 3.6.2 Habitat Design Summary .............................................................................. 47 3.6.3 Mass Budget ................................................................................................... 48 3.6.4 Power Budget ................................................................................................. 50 3.6.5 Launch Baseline ............................................................................................. 52 3.7 System Options .................................................................................................... 55 3.8 Technology Needs ................................................................................................ 57 4 CREW ACCOMMODATION ................................................................. 59 4.1 Challenges and Needs Within the Concept of Operations .................................. 59 4.1.1 Testing ............................................................................................................ 59 4.1.2 Inflation and Deployment of the Habitat ...................................................... 59 4.1.3 Outfitting and Commissioning of the Habitat ............................................... 59 ESA UNCLASSIFIED – Releasable to the Public Moon Village CDF Study Report: CDF-202(A) – Issue 1.1 September 2020 page 6 of 185 4.1.4 Minimum Accommodation Functionalities .................................................. 59 4.1.5 Crew Accommodation Requirements ............................................................ 60 4.1.6 Partial Gravity Challenges.............................................................................. 60 4.2 Baseline Solution .................................................................................................. 61 4.3 Budgets ................................................................................................................. 61 4.3.1 Galley and Food System ................................................................................. 61 4.3.2 Waste Collection and Hygiene ....................................................................... 61 4.3.3 Sleep Accommodation, Health and Clothing ................................................ 62 4.3.4 Operational Supplies and Maintenance ........................................................ 64 4.3.5 Airlocks ........................................................................................................... 64 4.3.6 Power Requirements ...................................................................................... 65 4.3.7 Total Budgets Over All Crew Accommodation Elements .............................. 65 4.4 Technology Needs ................................................................................................ 66 5 CONFIGURATION - STRUCTURES ..................................................... 69 5.1 Challenges and Needs Within the Concept of Operations .................................. 69 5.2 Baseline Design .................................................................................................... 70 5.3 Budgets ................................................................................................................. 76 6 MECHANISMS ..................................................................................... 77 6.1 Challenges and Needs Within the Concept of Operations .................................. 77 6.2 Baseline Design ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model For
    A QUANTITATIVE HUMAN SPACECRAFT DESIGN EVALUATION MODEL FOR ASSESSING CREW ACCOMMODATION AND UTILIZATION by CHRISTINE FANCHIANG B.S., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007 M.S., University of Colorado Boulder, 2010 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences 2017 i This thesis entitled: A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization written by Christine Fanchiang has been approved for the Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences Dr. David M. Klaus Dr. Jessica J. Marquez Dr. Nisar R. Ahmed Dr. Daniel J. Szafir Dr. Jennifer A. Mindock Dr. James A. Nabity Date: 13 March 2017 The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. ii Fanchiang, Christine (Ph.D., Aerospace Engineering Sciences) A Quantitative Human Spacecraft Design Evaluation Model for Assessing Crew Accommodation and Utilization Thesis directed by Professor David M. Klaus Crew performance, including both accommodation and utilization factors, is an integral part of every human spaceflight mission from commercial space tourism, to the demanding journey to Mars and beyond. Spacecraft were historically built by engineers and technologists trying to adapt the vehicle into cutting edge rocketry with the assumption that the astronauts could be trained and will adapt to the design. By and large, that is still the current state of the art. It is recognized, however, that poor human-machine design integration can lead to catastrophic and deadly mishaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Design of Senior Family Bathroom System Based on Demand Theory
    E3S Web of Conferences 179, 02080 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017902080 EWRE 2020 Design of Senior Family Bathroom System Based on Demand Theory Rong Han1, Dandan Shao2*and YuXin Wang 3 1 College of Art, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province,212000, China 2 College of Art, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province,212000, China 3 College of Art, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang City, Jiangsu Province,212000, China Abstract. Aiming at the characteristics of the elderly population, based on the demand theory, this paper proposes a design scheme of a suitable family bathroom system. Based on the theory of Maslow's demand theory, understand the real psychological status of the elderly through theoretical transformation, analyze the physical and psychological characteristics of the elderly, and simulate the specific behavior of the elderly in the bathroom space system through user interviews. In response to the elderly's needs for the space, facilities and supporting facilities of the bathroom system, a type of bathroom space was finally selected to carry out the design practice, which provided certain theoretical support and practical reference value for the subsequent research of bathroom products for the elderly. them focus on the general analysis of the product size and lack the corresponding in-depth exploration. At 1 Introduction present, there are many plagiarism products in the Since 2000, China has begun to enter an aging society. bathroom market and lack of innovative design. The Population aging is an inevitable trend in social design of home bathroom systems based on the theory of development and a hot topic in the world today (as needs is a targeted, humanized adjustment and change shown in Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • “Gateway Earth” – Low Cost Access to Interplanetary Space
    RIS-2015-13 “Gateway Earth” – Low Cost Access to Interplanetary Space Derek Webber, FBIS, Senior Member AIAA Spaceport Associates PO Box 614, Damariscotta, Maine 04543, USA 207-563-2660 [email protected], www.SpaceportAssociates.com INTRODUCTION The paper describes some aspects of a proposed space development whose aim is to dramatically reduce the cost of missions, both crewed and robotic, to anywhere in the solar system. The concept uses a funding mechanism combining governmental and commercial financing working in new ways together. The aim is to enable interplanetary space transportation and exploration within realistic funding projections. The basic architecture uses a combined governmental/commercial space station (“Gateway Earth”) located in geostationary orbit (near the edge of Earth’s gravity well) and a logistical supply chain of reusable tugs going regularly between LEO (Low Earth Orbit) and GEO (Geostationary Orbit) and back. Part of the commercial station would be a GEO space tourist hotel. Other commercial uses of the Gateway complex would include servicing of GEO communications satellites. “Gateway Earth”, the station at the edge of interplanetary space, would consequently be partly funded by space tourism revenues, as would also be the operation of the tugs. It’s a way of exploring the solar system by using space tourism revenues to augment government funding. The paper addresses some design implications of including an industrial scale 3-D manufacturing facility at the Gateway complex, for building and assembling components of craft intended for ongoing interplanetary travel. Elements of a business case framework are presented, using market analogs for this next destination of space tourists beyond LEO, which supports the argument that the “Gateway Earth” architecture represents a way to achieve relatively low cost interplanetary travel.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Colonies & Lunar Bases
    Space Colonies & Why Build Colonies? Lunar Bases ! It isn’t so expensive – US military is many 100’s of billions $ a year ! Fewer casualties than war – 17 astronauts in 45 years of space Karen J. Meech, flight were lost Astronomer ! Humans have an “expansionist” spirit – Much more real estate! ! Valuable resources could be brought to Earth. Institute for Astronomy ! Enough solar energy to rid the world of oil dependency could be brought to Earth for less than the cost of the Iraq war ! Profitable: e.g. 1 Metallic NEO $20 trillion, 3He as a fuel . ! Maybe the time has not yet come, but someday we will need what space can provide Space Habitat Design Shielding – Radiation Protection Considerations ! Shielding characterization ! Aereal density, d [gm/cm2] ! Physiological Needs ! Total amount of material matters ! Shielding ! Type of material: secondary ! Ionizing radiation & particles 3 2 ! Meteoritic impact ! 1 Earth Atmosphere: 10 gm/cm ! Atmospheric containment ! ! = mass / volume ! What pressure needed? ! ! = mass / (area ! thickness) ! Psychological Needs ! What mix of gasses? ! ! = m/(ax) = d / x ! Environment stress ! Gravitational acceleration ! x = thickness = d / ! ! Isolation ! Why it is needed 3 ! Personal space ! How to do it Substance ! [gm/cm ] d / !" x [cm] x [m] ! Illumination / Energy 3 ! Entertainment Lead 8 10 /8 125 1.25 ! ! Aesthetics Food / Water Styrofoam 0.01 103/10-2 105 103 ! Space Requirements Water 1 103/1 103 10 Shielding Types – Active Shielding Types – Passive ! Enough matter between us & radiation ! Examples
    [Show full text]
  • Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp
    Project Selene: AIAA Lunar Base Camp AIAA Space Mission System 2019-2020 Virginia Tech Aerospace Engineering Faculty Advisor : Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Team Members : Olivia Arthur, Bobby Aselford, Michel Becker, Patrick Crandall, Heidi Engebreth, Maedini Jayaprakash, Logan Lark, Nico Ortiz, Matthew Pieczynski, Brendan Ventura Member AIAA Number Member AIAA Number And Signature And Signature Faculty Advisor 25807 Dr. Kevin Shinpaugh Brendan Ventura 1109196 Matthew Pieczynski 936900 Team Lead/Operations Logan Lark 902106 Heidi Engebreth 1109232 Structures & Environment Patrick Crandall 1109193 Olivia Arthur 999589 Power & Thermal Maedini Jayaprakash 1085663 Robert Aselford 1109195 CCDH/Operations Michel Becker 1109194 Nico Ortiz 1109533 Attitude, Trajectory, Orbits and Launch Vehicles Contents 1 Symbols and Acronyms 8 2 Executive Summary 9 3 Preface and Introduction 13 3.1 Project Management . 13 3.2 Problem Definition . 14 3.2.1 Background and Motivation . 14 3.2.2 RFP and Description . 14 3.2.3 Project Scope . 15 3.2.4 Disciplines . 15 3.2.5 Societal Sectors . 15 3.2.6 Assumptions . 16 3.2.7 Relevant Capital and Resources . 16 4 Value System Design 17 4.1 Introduction . 17 4.2 Analytical Hierarchical Process . 17 4.2.1 Longevity . 18 4.2.2 Expandability . 19 4.2.3 Scientific Return . 19 4.2.4 Risk . 20 4.2.5 Cost . 21 5 Initial Concept of Operations 21 5.1 Orbital Analysis . 22 5.2 Launch Vehicles . 22 6 Habitat Location 25 6.1 Introduction . 25 6.2 Region Selection . 25 6.3 Locations of Interest . 26 6.4 Eliminated Locations . 26 6.5 Remaining Locations . 27 6.6 Chosen Location .
    [Show full text]
  • History of Human Space Exploration and Habitat Design
    EVALUATION AND AUTOMATION OF SPACE HABITAT INTERIOR LAYOUTS A Dissertation Presented to The Academic Faculty by Matthew Simon In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology May 2016 Copyright 2015 U.S. Government, as represented by the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. No copyright is claimed in the United States under Title 17, U.S.C. All other rights reserved i EVALUATION AND AUTOMATION OF HABITAT INTERIOR LAYOUTS Approved by: Dr. Alan W. Wilhite, Chairman Dr. Jesse Hester School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Tech Research Institute Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Marianne R. Bobskill Dr. Brian German Space Mission Analysis Branch School of Aerospace Engineering NASA Langley Research Center Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Daniel P. Schrage School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: November 15, 2015 This document is dedicated to my family who provided constant support and encouragement throughout the many years of my education, and to Nate who taught me the meaning of life. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to acknowledge and thank the following persons for their advice and participation in the preparation of this thesis: Dr. Alan Wilhite Dr. Marianne Bobskill Larry Toups Dr. Robert Howard Kriss Kennedy Dr. Dale Arney iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The “Farm:” an Inflatable Centrifuge Biology Research Module on the International Space Station
    The “Farm:” An Inflatable Centrifuge Biology Research Module on the International Space Station M.Thangavelu1, L. Simurda2 As the sole manned laboratory in Low Earth Orbit, permanently operating in microgravity and largely unprotected by the Earth's atmosphere, the International Space Station serves as an unparalleled platform for studying the effects of low or zero-gravity and the space radiation environment on biological systems as well as developing, testing and certifying sturdy and reliable systems for long duration missions such as ambitious interplanetary expeditions planned for the future. Earth- bound research, automated research aboard satellites and short missions into low- altitude orbits cannot replicate long-term ISS experiments. Abandoning or de- orbiting the station, even in 2020, leaves the international scientific and engineering community bereft of a manned station in orbit and destroys any opportunity for conducting long-term microgravity and radiation experiments requiring human oversight in space. The United States should invest in extending the station's life by a minimum of 15 years from present by attaching an inflatable "Farm" centrifuge module to equip biologists, psychologists and engineers with the tools required to investigate these questions and more. At a time when humankind has only begun exploring the effects of the space environment on biological systems, it is essential that we not abandon the only empirical research facility in operation today and instead begin vigorously pursuing research in this area that is of vital importance to all humanity, not only in the basic and applied sciences but also in international collaboration. I. Introduction In June 2010, President Barack Obama announced a novel vision for NASA and proposed extending the life of the International Space Station (ISS) until at least 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021
    Astronomy News KW RASC FRIDAY JANUARY 8 2021 JIM FAIRLES What to expect for spaceflight and astronomy in 2021 https://astronomy.com/news/2021/01/what-to-expect-for- spaceflight-and-astronomy-in-2021 By Corey S. Powell | Published: Monday, January 4, 2021 Whatever craziness may be happening on Earth, the coming year promises to be a spectacular one across the solar system. 2020 - It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. First landing on the lunar farside, two impressive successes in gathering samples from asteroids, the first new pieces of the Moon brought home in 44 years, close-up explorations of the Sun, and major advances in low-cost reusable rockets. First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids First Visit to Jupiter's Trojan Asteroids In October, NASA is set to launch the Lucy spacecraft. Over its 12-year primary mission, Lucy will visit eight different asteroids. One target lies in the asteroid belt. The other seven are so-called Trojan asteroids that share an orbit with Jupiter, trapped in points of stability 60 degrees ahead of or behind the planet as it goes around the sun. These objects have been trapped in their locations for billions of years, probably since the time of the formation of the solar system. They contain preserved samples of water-rich and carbon-rich material in the outer solar system; some of that material formed Jupiter, while other bits moved inward to contribute to Earth's life-sustaining composition. As a whimsical aside: When meteorites strike carbon-rich asteroids, they create tiny carbon crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment
    AIAA 2014-1745 SpaceOps Conferences 5-9 May 2014, Pasadena, CA Proceedings of the 2014 SpaceOps Conference, SpaceOps 2014 Conference Pasadena, CA, USA, May 5-9, 2014, Paper DRAFT ONLY AIAA 2014-1745. Collision Avoidance Operations in a Multi-Mission Environment Manfred Bester,1 Bryce Roberts,2 Mark Lewis,3 Jeremy Thorsness,4 Gregory Picard,5 Sabine Frey,6 Daniel Cosgrove,7 Jeffrey Marchese,8 Aaron Burgart,9 and William Craig10 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450 With the increasing number of manmade object orbiting Earth, the probability for close encounters or on-orbit collisions is of great concern to spacecraft operators. The presence of debris clouds from various disintegration events amplifies these concerns, especially in low- Earth orbits. The University of California, Berkeley currently operates seven NASA spacecraft in various orbit regimes around the Earth and the Moon, and actively participates in collision avoidance operations. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory provide conjunction analyses. In two cases, collision avoidance operations were executed to reduce the risks of on-orbit collisions. With one of the Earth orbiting THEMIS spacecraft, a small thrust maneuver was executed to increase the miss distance for a predicted close conjunction. For the NuSTAR observatory, an attitude maneuver was executed to minimize the cross section with respect to a particular conjunction geometry. Operations for these two events are presented as case studies. A number of experiences and lessons learned are included. Nomenclature dLong = geographic longitude increment ΔV = change in velocity dZgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance increment i = inclination Pc = probability of collision R = geostationary radius RE = Earth radius σ = standard deviation Zgeo = geostationary orbit crossing distance I.
    [Show full text]
  • Potty Training: NASA Tests New $23M Titanium Space Toilet 1 October 2020, by Marcia Dunn
    Potty training: NASA tests new $23M titanium space toilet 1 October 2020, by Marcia Dunn the shakedown goes well, the toilet will be open for regular business. With SpaceX now launching astronauts to the space station and Boeing less than a year from sending up its first crew, more toilets are needed. The new one will be in its own stall alongside the old one on the U.S. side of the outpost. The old toilets cater more toward men. To better accommodate women, NASA tilted the seat on the new toilet and made it taller. The new shape should help astronauts position themselves better for No. 2, said Johnson Space Center's Melissa McKinley, the project manager. In this June 18, 2020 photo provided by NASA, astronaut Kate Rubins, center, and support personnel review the Universal Waste Management System, a low- gravity space toilet, in Houston. The new device is scheduled to be delivered to the International Space Station on Oct. 1, 2020. (Norah Moran/NASA via AP) NASA's first new space potty in decades—a $23 million titanium toilet better suited for women—is getting a not-so-dry run at the International Space Station before eventually flying to the moon. It's packed inside a cargo ship that should have blasted off late Thursday from Wallops Island, Virginia. But the launch was aborted with just two minutes remaining in the countdown. Northrop Northrup Grumman's Antares rocket is poised for launch at the NASA Wallops test flight facility Thursday, Oct. 1, Grumman said it would try again Friday night if 2020, in Wallops Island, Va.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Orbital Transportation Services
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight NASA/SP-2014-617 Commercial Orbital Transportation Services A New Era in Spaceflight On the cover: Background photo: The terminator—the line separating the sunlit side of Earth from the side in darkness—marks the changeover between day and night on the ground. By establishing government-industry partnerships, the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) program marked a change from the traditional way NASA had worked. Inset photos, right: The COTS program supported two U.S. companies in their efforts to design and build transportation systems to carry cargo to low-Earth orbit. (Top photo—Credit: SpaceX) SpaceX launched its Falcon 9 rocket on May 22, 2012, from Cape Canaveral, Florida. (Second photo) Three days later, the company successfully completed the mission that sent its Dragon spacecraft to the Station. (Third photo—Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls) Orbital Sciences Corp. sent its Antares rocket on its test flight on April 21, 2013, from a new launchpad on Virginia’s eastern shore. Later that year, the second Antares lifted off with Orbital’s cargo capsule, (Fourth photo) the Cygnus, that berthed with the ISS on September 29, 2013. Both companies successfully proved the capability to deliver cargo to the International Space Station by U.S. commercial companies and began a new era of spaceflight. ISS photo, center left: Benefiting from the success of the partnerships is the International Space Station, pictured as seen by the last Space Shuttle crew that visited the orbiting laboratory (July 19, 2011). More photos of the ISS are featured on the first pages of each chapter.
    [Show full text]
  • Beavers Space Badge What to Do Next…
    Beavers Space Badge What to do next… There are still some things to do before you gain your space badge. These sheets should help you work out what you’ve done and what you still need to do. To gain your Beaver Space Badge you must do all these things: 1. Identify some of the things you can see in the night sky, for example stars, planets and the Moon. 2. Be able to name the eight planets in our solar system. 3. Identify at least one constellation you can see. 4. Find out about a current space mission 8 1 Activity 1 - Identify some of the things you Activity 2 - Identify the planets in our solar can see in the night sky system Cut out the names below and stick them on page 3 You will have: been introduced to the Moon in our planetarium. You should know that the Moon doesn’t make its own light, but Jupiter Neptune reflects the light of our Sun. This is why the Moon has phases. Mars What to do: Venus Saturn What can you see in the sky? What can you see during the daylight? What can you see at night? Uranus Mercury Earth What can you see in daylight and at night? Activity 4 - Find out about a space mission Draw a circle round the things you can see in the night sky. We live in an exciting time with a number of major space missions happening over the next few years. Here are just a few: Rosetta- Comet Chaser- The first probe to land on a comet.
    [Show full text]