DOCSLIB.ORG

Cycling UK's Response to the Department for Transport's Cycling and Walking Investment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cycling UK's Response to the Department for Transport's Cycling and Walking Investment Cycling UK's response to the Department for Transport's Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy safety review: call for evidence www.cyclinguk.org/cyclesafety CYCLING UK’S RESPONSE TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT’S CYCLING AND WALKING STRATEGY SAFETY REVIEW: CALL FOR EVIDENCE June 2018 Contact Cycling UK Cycling UK Parklands Railton Road Guildford Surrey GU2 9JX Tel.: 01483 238 300 Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2018 Cycling UK. All rights reserved. Response authors: Cherry Allan, Duncan Dollimore, Roger Geffen and Chris Peck Edited by: Cherry Allan Page 2 www.cyclinguk.org/cyclesafety Table of contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 Key points ................................................................................................................................................. 6 The benefits of cycling ............................................................................................................................. 7 'Safety in Numbers' ................................................................................................................................ 11 The 'Safe systems’ approach and 'Vision Zero' .................................................................................... 12 The structure of this response .............................................................................................................. 13 OUR RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 15 1. SAFE ROADS AND JUNCTIONS ................................................................................ 17 1.1 Cycle-friendly infrastructure and design standards ............................................. 17 General principles: plan for place and movement of people, not vehicles........................................ 17 Network planning for cycling ................................................................................................................. 18 Clear, up-to-date guidance .................................................................................................................... 21 What the guidance should say and do ................................................................................................. 22 Road safety vs public health ................................................................................................................. 24 The problem of low-quality cycle infrastructure ................................................................................... 25 Spatial planning for cycling networks ................................................................................................... 27 Cycle-proofing major projects ................................................................................................................ 28 Resources to retro-fit, not just for new build ........................................................................................ 28 Highway maintenance for cyclists ........................................................................................................ 29 1.2 New rules for junctions ......................................................................................... 30 Junction priority and the hierarchy of road users: not followed in practice ....................................... 30 Turning the Corner: making junctions better ....................................................................................... 31 2 SAFE ROAD USERS ................................................................................................... 35 2.1 Cycle awareness ................................................................................................... 35 Current driving standards, and behaviour towards cyclists ................................................................ 36 What drivers need to know.................................................................................................................... 37 Awareness campaigns: good and bad practice ................................................................................... 40 Awareness + enforcement .................................................................................................................... 44 Road safety education in school/college ............................................................................................. 45 2.2 Driver training, testing and licensing .................................................................... 46 Need for research into Bikeability's long-term effect on driving standards ....................................... 46 Training and testing: cycle safety awareness, hazard perception and traffic rules .......................... 47 Graduated Driver Licensing ................................................................................................................... 49 Bikeability Level 3 for learner drivers and professionals .................................................................... 52 Re-testing, medical fitness and eyesight ............................................................................................. 53 Offending drivers: re-tests, re-training and NDORS ............................................................................. 57 Page 3 www.cyclinguk.org/cyclesafety 2.3 Policing the roads ................................................................................................. 59 Priority for roads policing ....................................................................................................................... 60 Reporting serious injury collisions to the CPS ..................................................................................... 62 Need for research into police handling of collisions and near misses .............................................. 64 Reporting portals for camera footage .................................................................................................. 65 The 'Investigating Road Deaths' manual .............................................................................................. 66 Proactive enforcement/education operations ..................................................................................... 66 2.4 Other enforcement agencies and regulatory bodies ........................................... 67 The Health and Safety Executive .......................................................................................................... 67 Collaboration between agencies ........................................................................................................... 70 Traffic Commissioners ........................................................................................................................... 71 2.5 Road traffic offences and penalties ..................................................................... 72 The need for a full review ...................................................................................................................... 72 'Careless' and 'dangerous' driving offences: not fit for purpose ......................................................... 74 Improving the framework ...................................................................................................................... 77 Disqualification ...................................................................................................................................... 78 'Car-dooring' ............................................................................................................................................ 82 Failing to stop ......................................................................................................................................... 85 Part 6 of the Traffic Management Act .................................................................................................. 86 2.6 Revising The Highway Code .................................................................................. 87 Overtaking distances ............................................................................................................................. 88 The 'Dutch Reach' .................................................................................................................................. 90 Rules on junction priority ....................................................................................................................... 91 Removing prejudicial rules on helmets and hi-viz ............................................................................... 93 2.7 Regulating cyclists' behaviour .............................................................................. 97 Cyclists' vulnerability and the relatively low risk they pose to others ................................................. 99 Cyclist licensing/compulsory training and insurance ........................................................................ 101 'Road tax' .............................................................................................................................................. 105 2.8 Cycle training ...................................................................................................... 105 Bikeability's benefits ............................................................................................................................ 106 Need for systematically collected evidence
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Written Comments
    Written Comments 1 2 3 4 1027 S. Lusk Street Boise, ID 83706 [email protected] 208.429.6520 www.boisebicycleproject.org ACHD, March, 2016 The Board of Directors of the Boise Bicycle Project (BBP) commends the Ada County Highway District (ACHD) for its efforts to study and solicit input on implementation of protected bike lanes on Main and Idaho Streets in downtown Boise. BBP’s mission includes the overall goal of promoting the personal, social and environmental benefits of bicycling, which we strive to achieve by providing education and access to affordable refurbished bicycles to members of the community. Since its establishment in 2007, BBP has donated or recycled thousands of bicycles and has provided countless individuals with bicycle repair and safety skills each year. BBP fully supports efforts to improve the bicycle safety and accessibility of downtown Boise for the broadest segment of the community. Among the alternatives proposed in ACHD’s solicitation, the Board of Directors of BBP recommends that the ACHD pursue the second alternative – Bike Lanes Protected by Parking on Main Street and Idaho Street. We also recommend that there be no motor vehicle parking near intersections to improve visibility and limit the risk of the motor vehicles turning into bicyclists in the protected lane. The space freed up near intersections could be used to provide bicycle parking facilities between the bike lane and the travel lane, which would help achieve the goal of reducing sidewalk congestion without compromising safety. In other communities where protected bike lanes have been implemented, this alternative – bike lanes protected by parking – has proven to provide the level of comfort necessary to allow bicycling in downtown areas by families and others who would not ride in traffic.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances
    Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances November 2011 i iv . Pedestrian and Bicycle Friendly Policies, Practices, and Ordinances November 2011 i The Delaware Valley Regional Planning The symbol in our logo is Commission is dedicated to uniting the adapted from region’s elected officials, planning the official professionals, and the public with a DVRPC seal and is designed as a common vision of making a great region stylized image of the Delaware Valley. even greater. Shaping the way we live, The outer ring symbolizes the region as a whole while the diagonal bar signifies the work, and play, DVRPC builds Delaware River. The two adjoining consensus on improving transportation, crescents represent the Commonwealth promoting smart growth, protecting the of Pennsylvania and the State of environment, and enhancing the New Jersey. economy. We serve a diverse region of DVRPC is funded by a variety of funding nine counties: Bucks, Chester, Delaware, sources including federal grants from the Montgomery, and Philadelphia in U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pennsylvania; and Burlington, Camden, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Gloucester, and Mercer in New Jersey. and Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the Pennsylvania and New Jersey DVRPC is the federally designated departments of transportation, as well Metropolitan Planning Organization for as by DVRPC’s state and local member the Greater Philadelphia Region — governments. The authors, however, are leading the way to a better future. solely responsible for the findings and conclusions herein, which may not represent the official views or policies of the funding agencies. DVRPC fully complies with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes and regulations in all programs and activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns Programmes
    Summary of Outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns Programmes Lynn Sloman, Andy Cope, Angela Kennedy, Fiona Crawford, Nick Cavill and John Parkin Report to the Department for Transport April 2017 The preferred citation for this paper is: Sloman L, Cope A, Kennedy A, Crawford F, Cavill N and Parkin J (2017) Summary of outcomes of the Cycling Demonstration Towns and Cycling City and Towns programmes This report was written by Transport for Quality of Life, based on analysis carried out by Sustrans Research and Monitoring Unit with Cavill Associates and University of the West of England, Bristol. www.transportforqualityoflife.com www.sustrans.org.uk www.cavill.net www.uwe.ac.uk Acknowledgements The authors are grateful for the extensive assistance of officers in the six Cycling Demonstration Towns and 12 Cycling City and Towns in providing monitoring data for this research. We are also grateful for additional support provided by Lisa Muller, Katie Pullen, George Macklon, Katie Thomson, James O’Hare, Richard Sanders, Alison Janes, Hannah Delaney, Laurence Bonner, Peter Stephenson, Charlotte Draycott and Jo Watson. Disclaimer Although this report was commissioned by the Department for Transport (DfT), the recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the DfT. While every effort has been made to ensure the information in this document is accurate, DfT does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains.
    [Show full text]
  • FHWA Bikeway Selection Guide
    BIKEWAY SELECTION GUIDE FEBRUARY 2019 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave Blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED February 2019 Final Report 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. FUNDING NUMBERS Bikeway Selection Guide NA 6. AUTHORS 5b. CONTRACT NUMBER Schultheiss, Bill; Goodman, Dan; Blackburn, Lauren; DTFH61-16-D-00005 Wood, Adam; Reed, Dan; Elbech, Mary 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION VHB, 940 Main Campus Drive, Suite 500 REPORT NUMBER Raleigh, NC 27606 NA Toole Design Group, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 800 Silver Spring, MD 20910 Mobycon - North America, Durham, NC 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING AND ADDRESS(ES) AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Tamara Redmon FHWA-SA-18-077 Project Manager, Office of Safety Federal Highway Administration 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington DC 20590 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE This document is available to the public on the FHWA website at: NA https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/ped_bike 13. ABSTRACT This document is a resource to help transportation practitioners consider and make informed decisions about trade- offs relating to the selection of bikeway types. This report highlights linkages between the bikeway selection process and the transportation planning process. This guide presents these factors and considerations in a practical process- oriented way. It draws on research where available and emphasizes engineering judgment, design flexibility, documentation, and experimentation. 14. SUBJECT TERMS 15. NUMBER OF PAGES Bike, bicycle, bikeway, multimodal, networks, 52 active transportation, low stress networks 16. PRICE CODE NA 17. SECURITY 18. SECURITY 19. SECURITY 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle Network Improvements
    GEORGIA DOT RESEARCH PROJECT 14-39 FINAL REPORT USING CROWDSOURCING TO PRIORITIZE BICYCLE NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS OFFICE OF RESEARCH 15 KENNEDY DRIVE FOREST PARK, GA 30297-2534 This page intentionally left blank. GDOT Research Project RP14-39 Final Report Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle Network Improvements By Dr. Kari E. Watkins Assistant Professor School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Chris LeDantec Assistant Professor School of Literature, Media and Communication Georgia Institute of Technology Contract with Georgia Department of Transportation In cooperation with U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration April 2016 The contents of this report reflect the views of the author(s) who is (are) responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Georgia Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. i This page intentionally left blank. ii 1.Report No.: 2. Government Accession No.: 3. Recipient's Catalog No.: FHWA-GA-16-1439 4. Title and Subtitle: 5. Report Date: Using Crowdsourcing to Prioritize Bicycle April 2016 Network Improvements 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s): 8. Performing Organ. Report No.: Dr. Kari E. Watkins, PE (P.I.), Dr. Chris LeDantec (co-P.I), Aditi Misra, Mariam Asad, Charlene Mingus, Cary Bearn, Alex Poznanski, Anhong Guo, Rohit Ammanamanchi, Vernon Gentry, Aaron Gooze 9. Performing Organization Name and Address: 10. Work Unit No. Georgia Institute of Technology 11. Contract or Grant No.: School of Civil and Environmental Engineering GDOT Research Project No.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to the Curb: a Guide to Building Protected Bike Lanes.”)
    Getting to the Curb A Guide to Building Protected Bike Lanes That Work for Pedestrians This report is dedicated to Joanna Fraguli, a passionate pedestrian safety advocate whose work made San Francisco a better place for everyone. This report was created by the Senior & Disability Pedestrian Safety Workgroup of the San Francisco Vision Zero Coalition. Member organizations include: • Independent Living Resource Center of San Francisco • Senior & Disability Action • Walk San Francisco • Age & Disability Friendly SF • San Francisco Mayor’s Office on Disability Primary author: Natasha Opfell, Walk San Francisco Advisor/editor: Cathy DeLuca, Walk San Francisco Illustrations: EricTuvel For more information about the Workgroup, contact Walk SF at [email protected]. Thank you to the San Francisco Department of Public Health for contributing to the success of this project through three years of funding through the Safe Streets for Seniors program. A sincere thanks to everyone who attended our March 6, 2018 charette “Designing Protected Bike Lanes That Are Safe and Accessible for Pedestrians.” This guide would not exist without your invaluable participation. Finally, a special thanks to the following individuals and agencies who gave their time and resources to make our March 2018 charette such a great success: • Annette Williams, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency • Jamie Parks, San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency • Kevin Jensen, San Francisco Public Works • Arfaraz Khambatta, San Francisco Mayor’s Office on Disability Table of
    [Show full text]
  • Road Safety Action Group Inner Melbourne Name of Project: Door Knock 2012 Project Number: 0010
    RSAGIM Door Knock – Background Research Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................... iii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Car dooring zone .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Road rules .................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Objectives ..................................................................................................... 3 2 Crash Analysis ...................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 4 2.2 What is the prevalence of car dooring crashes? .......................................... 6 2.3 Which vehicle door presents the hazard? .................................................... 7 2.4 Where are car dooring collisions occurring? ................................................ 7 2.5 What is the injury severity? ........................................................................ 11 2.6 Who is injured? ........................................................................................... 13 2.7 How has the injury burden changed? ......................................................... 14 2.8 When are the crashes occurring? .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Cycling Town: Compilation
    Making a Cycling Town: a compilation of practitioners’ experiences from the Cycling Demonstration Towns programme Qualitative Survey 2005-2009 Contents Abbreviations & Glossary 5 Introduction 6 Acknowledgements 7 Chapter 1: ‘Lift Off’ for Cycling 9 Bikeability 13 Chapter 2: Cycling Programme Delivery Best Practice 15 Chapter 3: Cycling Demonstration Town Stories 27 Aylesbury 28 Brighton & Hove 34 Darlington 40 Derby 46 Exeter 52 Lancaster with Morecambe 58 Chapter 4: Common Elements of the Programmes 65 Infrastructure 66 Marketing and Enabling Cycling 72 Schools and Bikeability 79 Workplaces 86 2 Figures and Tables Figure 2.1: Average Proportion of Budget Spent by Measure 21 Figure 3.1: Aylesbury Programme Summary 28 Figure 3.2: Brighton & Hove Programme Summary 34 Figure 3.3: Darlington Programme Summary 40 Figure 3.4: Derby Programme Summary 46 Figure 3.5: Exeter Programme Summary 52 Figure 3.6: Lancaster with Morecambe Programme Summary 58 Figure 4.1: Marketing Channels & Tools Used by the Cycling Demonstration Towns 73 Figure 4.2: Bikeability and Bike It Participation by Cycling Demonstration Town 79 Table 2.1: Average Staff Time Invested by Measure 18 Table 4.1: Investment in Infrastructure 71 Table 4.2: CDT Information Resources & Distribution Channels 72 Table 4.3: Investment in Marketing and Enabling Cycling Initiatives 77 Table 4.4: Investment in Cycling Promotion at Schools 84 Table 4.5: Investment in Cycling Promotion at Workplaces 89 Box 2.1: Examples of Internal Teams Supporting CDT Delivery 19 Box 2.2: Examples of External
    [Show full text]
  • Scott Lagasse, Jr
    Messenger Building a Bicycle-Friendly Florida Vol. 19, No. 1 • Winter 2016 OFFICIAL NEWSLETTER OF THE FLORIDA BICYCLE ASSOCIATION, INC. Fast Track Scott Lagasse, Jr. “Driving” the Alert Today to... Florida Message Home By Trenda McPherson & Alert Today Florida staff cott Lagasse, Jr. or “Scotty” as many of Sus have come to know him, is the official spokesperson for Alert Today Florida. Scotty pilots the Alert Today Florida NASCAR Xfinity Series Race Car and the Alert Today Florida NASCAR Camping World Truck Series Race Truck. Yes, he “pilots” them, because this guy FLIES around the track!? While many prefer a motor vehicle as their mode of transportation, Scotty’s Membership 2 preference, second only to the driver’s seat on race day, is his bicycle. He’s been an avid cyclist for most of his life. He rides Blue Light Corner 5 primarily for the health benefits, but he also enjoys the fresh air and the fresh perspective WHEELS Wrap 8-9 he gets when he rides. “Unfortunately, motorists don’t always Ask Geo 11 share the road with bicyclists, and there are some roads I don’t feel safe riding on Gears 101 12 because of it,” Scotty stated. He feels it’s important to “humanize” bicycling by Touring Calendar 14 reminding motorists that PEOPLE are on Scott Lagasse, Jr. proudly sported the FBA and new Alert Tonight Florida logos at the November bicycles. “Every Life Counts” is one of Alert Homestead race. (photo courtesy of Team SLR) Today Florida’s campaigns and one of the messages Scotty drives home through his and bicycle safety? Why not? Scotty is a or other event, or organizing the next new racing and appearances outside the track.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOW Portfolio of Measures: the Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing
    THE ROLE OF WALKING AND CYCLING IN REDUCING CONGESTION A PORTFOLIO OF MEASURES A PORTFOLIO OF MEASURES FLOW DOCUMENT TITLE The Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing Congestion: A Portfolio of Measures AUTHORS Thorsten Koska, Frederic Rudolph (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH); Case Studies: Benjamin Schreck, Andreas Vesper (Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen), Tamás Halmos (Budapesti Közlekedési Központ), Tamás Mátrai (Budapesti Műszaki és Gazdaságtudományi Egyetem), Alicja Pawłowska (Municipality of Gdynia), Jacek Oskarbski (Politechnika Gdanska), Benedicte Swennen (European Cyclists’ Federation), Nora Szabo (PTV AG), Graham Cavanagh (Rupprecht Consult GmbH), Florence Lepoudre (Traject), Katie Millard (Transport Research Laboratory), Martin Wedderburn (Walk21), Miriam Müller, David Knor (Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH) CONTACT Project coordinator: Rupprecht Consult Bernard Gyergyay: [email protected] Kristin Tovaas: [email protected] Project dissemination manager: Polis Daniela Stoycheva: [email protected] CITATION FLOW Project (2016). The Role of Walking and Cycling in Reducing Congestion: A Portfolio of Measures. Brussels. Available at http://www.h2020-flow.eu. IMAGE DISCLAIMER The images in this document are used as a form of visual citation to support and clarify statements made in the text. The authors have made great effort to provide credit for every image used. If, despite our efforts, we have not given sufficient credit to the author of any images used, please contact us directly at [email protected] LAYOUT PEAK Sourcing DATE July 2016 The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the INEA nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 9 Cycle and Rail Integration (Draft)
    Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 9: Cycle and rail integration (2014, draft) Sustrans Design Manual Chapter 9 Cycle and Rail Integration (draft) December 2014 December 2014 1 Sustrans Design Manual • Chapter 9: Cycle and rail integration (2014, draft) About Sustrans Contents Sustrans makes smarter travel choices This chapter of the Sustrans Design Manual should be read in possible, desirable and inevitable. We’re conjunction with Chapter 1 “Principles and processes for cycle friendly a leading UK charity enabling people to design.” That chapter includes key guidance on core design principles, travel by foot, bike or public transport whether to integrate with or segregate from motor traffic, the space for more of the journeys we make every required by cyclists and other road users as well as geometrical day. We work with families, communities, considerations. Readers are also directed towards the “Handbook for policy-makers and partner organisations cycle-friendly design” which contains a concise illustrated compendium so that people are able to choose of the technical guidance contained in the Design Manual. This chapter healthier, cleaner and cheaper journeys, has initially been issued as a draft and it is intended that it be reviewed with better places and spaces to move during 2015; feedback on the content is invited and should be made by through and live in. 31 May 2015 to [email protected] It’s time we all began making smarter travel choices. Make your move and 1. Key principles support Sustrans today. www.sustrans. 2. Introduction org.uk 3. Travelling to the station Head Office 4. Routes into and within the station Sustrans 2 Cathedral Square 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycling to the Future
    Cycling to the Future: Lessons from Cities across the Globe John Pucher, Rutgers University Ralph Buehler, Virginia Tech Photo: Susan Handy Photo: Ralph Buehler Photo:Photo: SF GregBike CoalitionRaismanSan Antonio Photo: Bike Texas Photo: Marie Demers Advantages of Cycling: • Economical: Affordable by everyone, requiring minimal costs for individuals and governments • Good for business: Generate retail sales and profits from tourism • No pollution: Clean and quiet • Energy-efficient: Use up calories we need to burn off from eating too much • Healthy: Many studies report on physical, social, mental health benefits • Fun: Getting out into the fresh air with family and friends Cycling Share of Daily Trips in Europe, North 30.0 America, and Australia, 1999-2008 25.0 20.0 15.0 Percent of trips by cycling cycling oftrips by Percent 26 10.0 18 5.0 10 9 9 8 4 4 0.5 1 2 3 1 1 2 0.0 Source: Pucher and Buehler (eds.) City Cycling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012 Bicycle Share of Work Commuters in the USA (2007) and Canada (2006) Source: Pucher, J., Buehler, R., Seinen, M., “Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An Update and Re- Assessment of Cycling Trends and Policies,” Transportation Research A, Vol. 45 (6), 2011, pp. 451-475. Lots of Potential for Increased Cycling: Many daily trips in American urban areas are short enough to walk or bike! • ~27% of all trips in the U.S. were a mile or shorter in 2009 • ~41% of all trips were shorter than two miles Share of Cycling for Short Trips 40 NL 35 30 DK 25 GER 20 35 15 31 29 24 24 10 Percent Percent oftrips by cycling 18 16 USA 12 5 7 2 1 0 2 0<2.5km 0<2.5km 0<2.5km 0<2.5km 5<7.5km 4.5<6.5km 4.5km-6.5km 4.5km-6.5km 2.5km<4.5km 2.5km<4.5km 2.5km<4.5km 2.5km<4.5km Trip distance category Source: Pucher and Buehler (eds.) City Cycling.
    [Show full text]