Butlleti´ 35
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Volební Geografie CDU/CSU – Situace Za Vlády Angely Merkelové
MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA FAKULTA SOCIÁLNÍCH STUDIÍ Katedra politologie Obor Politologie Volební geografie CDU/CSU – situace za vlády Angely Merkelové Bakalářská práce Monika Bělašková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Michal Pink, Ph.D. UČO: 397600 Obor: Politologie Imatrikulační ročník: 2011 Brno, 29. 4. 2014 1 Prohlášení o autorství práce Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci na téma Volební geografie CDU/CSU – situace za vlády Angely Merkelové vypracovala samostatně a použila jen zdroje uvedené v seznamu literatury. V Brně, 29. 4. 2014 Podpis:............................................ 2 Poděkování Ráda bych zde poděkovala za užitečné rady a odborné připomínky vedoucímu práce Mgr. Michalu Pinkovi, Ph.D. 3 Anotace Tato práce se zabývá volebními výsledky Křesťansko-demokratické unie a Křesťansko-sociální unie ve Spolkové republice Německo od nástupu Angely Merkelové do kancléřského úřadu. Cílem je zjištění vývoje volební podpory křesťanských stran v průběhu vlády první ženské kancléřky, tedy od r. 2005 do posledních spolkových voleb r. 2013. Práce vychází ze zjišťování volební podpory strany na úrovni volebních obvodů pomocí volební geografie. Závěrečným výstupem je analýza volební podpory strany a nárůstu volebních zisků v průběhu vlády. Annotation This work deals with the election results of the Christian-Democratic Union and Christian-Social Union in the Federal Republic of Germany since Angela Merkel started in the Chanccellor´s Office. Primary aim is detection of the development of electoral support of Christian parties during the government of the first female Chancellor, so from year 2005 until the last Federal votes in the year 2013. The work is based on detection of the election support of the party at the degree of the electoral district using the electoral geography. -
Mandaterechner Wie Groß Wird Der Bundestag?
#Mandaterechner Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ausgabe 1 | 2021 Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ergebnisse einer Projektionsrechnung Robert Vehrkamp WIE GROSS WIRD DER BUNDESTAG? – ERGEBNISSE EINER PROJEKTIONSRECHNUNG Impressum © Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Juli 2021 Verantwortlich Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Christina Tillmann Inhaltliche Mitarbeit Lars Bischoff Matthias Moehl Autor Redaktionelle Unterstützung Gaëlle Beckmann Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Sandra Stratos ist Senior Advisor der Bertelsmann Stiftung im Programm „Zukunft der Demokratie“ und war Gast- Gestaltung wissenschaftler der Abteilung „Demokratie und Demo- Markus Diekmann, Bielefeld kratisierung“ am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB). Im Juni 2021 wurde er als Sachverständiger in die Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages zur Reform des Bundeswahlrechts und zur Modernisierung der DOI 10.11586/2021065 Parlamentsarbeit berufen. [email protected] 2 WAS IST UND WAS KANN DER #MANDATERECHNER? Was ist und was kann der #Mandaterechner? Mit dem #Mandaterechner lassen sich Projek- Der #Mandaterechner erweitert damit bisher vor- tionsrechnungen zur Größe des Bundestages nach liegende Berechnungsmodelle um die Variable des der Bundestagswahl 2021 durchführen. Auf der Splittingverhaltens. Anstatt mit einer konkreten Grundlage des aktuellen Umfragetrends und in Annahme über das Splittingverhalten zu arbeiten Abhängigkeit von konkreten Annahmen über das und die Größe des Bundestages dann in Abhän- Splittingverhalten der Wähler:innen zwischen gigkeit vom Zweitstimmenergebnis zu berechnen, -
Historic Background and Architecture of Çanakkale Martyrs Monument
Research Article Historic Background and Architecture of Çanakkale Martyrs Monument Dr. Şeyda ÜSTÜNİPEK Istanbul Arel University Department of Graphic Design [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-294X Received: 08.10.2020 Accepted: 05.11.2020 Abstract: Çanakkale Martyrs Monument, rising with all its glory today, is a monument built for the great memory of the soldiers who died on the front of Çanakkale. The process from the idea of the monument to the project contest and then the implementation and opening of the project has spread over a very long period of time. The process, which started with the creation of a public opinion, was kept alive with the agenda and follow-up of the press, and construction progressed with the important contributions of the Martyrs Cemeteries Reconstruction Society. The design of Doğan Erginbaş and İsmail Utkular won the competition organized for the monument project. This winning work is considered a product of II. National Architecture Movement and inspired by the German Architecture introduced under the leadership of Paul Bonatz in those years. The Monument was realized with significant financial participation and support of the people, therefore it is a work that has survived as a symbol of social solidarity in war and peace. This article aims to reveal the socio-political and architectural foundations and qualities of the Çanakkale Martyrs Monument. Keywords: Çanakkale Martyrs Monument, Doğan Erginbaş, İsmail Utkular, architecture, monument, Paul Bonatz Tarihsel Süreci ve Mimarisiyle Çanakkale Şehitler Abidesi Özet: Bugün bütün görkemiyle yükselen Çanakkale Şehitler Abidesi, Çanakkale cephesinde ölen askerlerin yüce anısı için yapılmış bir anıttır. -
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. -
Wahlkreise Nach Parteien Und Zweitstimmenanteil
Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd. Wahlkreis Länder- Zweitstimmen in % Nr. kennzeichen 2009 2005 SPD 001 124 Gelsenkirchen NW 42,0 53,8 002 117 Duisburg II NW 40,7 55,3 003 142 Herne - Bochum II NW 40,2 54,0 004 118 Oberhausen - Wesel III NW 39,4 53,9 005 120 Essen II NW 39,0 51,5 006 025 Aurich - Emden NI 38,8 55,9 007 145 Unna I NW 37,6 50,3 008 126 Bottrop - Recklinghausen III NW 37,1 50,4 009 123 Recklinghausen II NW 36,8 51,4 010 141 Bochum I NW 36,3 49,2 011 116 Duisburg I NW 36,3 49,9 012 144 Dortmund II NW 35,6 50,8 013 119 Mülheim - Essen I NW 35,6 47,6 014 122 Recklinghausen I NW 35,5 50,7 015 140 Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis II NW 34,9 47,2 016 136 Lippe I NW 34,5 43,1 017 170 Werra-Meißner - Hersfeld-Rotenburg HE 34,4 45,3 018 050 Salzgitter - Wolfenbüttel NI 34,2 47,7 019 171 Schwalm-Eder HE 33,9 45,0 020 146 Hamm - Unna II NW 33,4 47,9 021 047 Hameln-Pyrmont - Holzminden NI 33,4 47,4 022 168 Waldeck HE 33,0 44,1 023 053 Goslar - Northeim - Osterode NI 33,0 45,9 024 143 Dortmund I NW 33,0 48,2 025 041 Nienburg II - Schaumburg NI 33,0 47,0 026 134 Herford - Minden-Lübbecke II NW 32,9 40,7 027 139 Hagen - Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis I NW 32,9 45,8 028 049 Hildesheim NI 32,9 47,0 029 046 Gifhorn - Peine NI 32,9 46,4 030 048 Hannover-Land II NI 32,8 46,8 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd. -
University of Stuttgart
University of Stuttgart Institute of Construction Management University of Stuttgart Univ.-Prof. Dr. -Ing. Fritz Berner Ordinarius Global Leadership Forum for Construction Engineering and Management Programs May 19-20, 2012 Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Berner University of Stuttgart Institut für Baubetriebslehre Cologn e Stuttgart and the University 2 Institute of Construction Management, University of Stuttgart May 19-20, 2012 Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Berner University of Stuttgart Institut für Baubetriebslehre Popular institutions 3 Institute of Construction Management, University of Stuttgart May 19-20, 2012 Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Berner University of Stuttgart Institut für Baubetriebslehre University of Stuttgart – History 1829 Foundation of the royal secondary and business school of Stuttgart by King Wilhelm I. of Württemberg (“Combined secondary and business school“). First school building: A former military gazebo near the city centre. 1862 The School is directly supervised by the ministry of education. It is given a self- administration containing an annually elected vice chancellor and several faculties with deans. 1870 Introduction of Diploma-Examinations 1890 Title “Technical High-school“ 1900 Right to award doctoral degrees 4 Institute of Construction Management, University of Stuttgart May 19-20, 2012 Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Fritz Berner University of Stuttgart Institut für Baubetriebslehre University of Stuttgart – History 1950 New buildings for several institutes were constructed, among the council buildings K I and K II. 1957 The second campus is built in Stuttgart-Vaihingen. Today more than two thirds of all institutes are settled there 1964 Foundation of the Institute of Construction Management 1967 New Title “University of Stuttgart“ 1974 Over 10.000 students 1988 Over 20.000 students 2000 Setup of a university council 2011 About 23.000 students (including about 5.000 foreign students) 5 Institute of Construction Management, University of Stuttgart May 19-20, 2012 Univ.-Prof. -
University Town of Tübingen
University Town of Tübingen Report on the application of Tübingen for the UNESCO World Heritage List Gutachten zur Bewerbung Tübingens um Aufnahme in die UNESCO-Welterbeliste (Englische Fassung) Prof. em. Dr. Dr. h.c. Willem Frijhoff Erasmus University Rotterdam / VU-University, Amsterdam) Report on the application of Tübingen for the UNESCO World Heritage List View from the Österberg across the historic city centre to Hohentübingen Castle Blick vom Österberg über die Altstadt zum Schloss Hohentübingen 2 Report on the application of Tübingen for the UNESCO World Heritage List Preamble This report has been written to substantiate the candidacy of the city of Tübingen (Baden-Württemberg, Germany) for the inclusion on the World Heritage List as the very model of a ‘university town’.* Many cities of Euro- pe and the Americas can rightfully boast of the richness of their historical legacy in matters of higher education and university life. Besides Tübingen, several other European towns owe their reputation to the preservation of a large number of historical buildings related to their university: Paris, Bolog- na, Oxford and Cambridge, Salamanca, Prague, Vilnius, Coimbra, Louvain, Uppsala and Alcalá de Henares, or outside Europe México City, Williams- burg (Virginia), even the modern Ciudad Universitaria of Caracas (placed on the World Cultural Heritage list in 2000). Just like Tübingen, other Ger- man towns such as Marburg, Heidelberg, Göttingen, Freiburg, Wittenberg, Helmstedt, Erfurt, Ingolstadt, Leipzig or Jena still possess many older or newer buildings attesting to their historical importance as towns endowed with a university. Even so, very few among them unite the prerequisites for “…Tübingen holds an unparalleled a nomination to the World Heritage List as a ‘university town’ in the fullest place because of the exceptional and most comprehensive sense of the word. -
Cause Or Consequence? the Alternative for Germany and Attitudes Toward Migration Policy
Cause or Consequence? The Alternative for Germany and Attitudes toward Migration Policy Hannah M. Alarian Political Science, University of Florida Abstract: Does a far-right electoral victory change mainstream support for migration policy? Although we know how migration can shape support for the far-right, we know little about the inverse. This article addresses this ques- tion, exploring whether an Alternative for Germany (AfD) candidate’s election changes non-far-right voter attitudes toward migration policies. In combining the German Longitudinal Election Study Short-Term Campaign panel with fed- eral electoral returns, I find the AfD’s 2017 success significantly altered migra- tion attitudes. Specifically, policy support for immigration and asylum declined precipitously where an AfD candidate won the plurality of first votes. Yet these voters were also more likely to support multicultural policies for current immi- grants. Successful AfD candidates therefore appear to enable both an endorse- ment of xenophobic rhetoric and a rejection of cultural assimilation. Keywords: elections, far-right populism, Germany, migration, public opinion Few policies are as connected to the rise of the far right as migration. Even in Germany where nationalistic politics are highly stigmatized, the far-right, Alternative for Germany (AfD) has proven successful in linking itself with nativist migration policies. This change in focus for the AfD from Euroscepti- cism to nationalism came at the height of the 2015 refugee crisis, a message that resonated with traditional mainstream and, perhaps surprisingly, immigrant voters.1 For many of these voters, the 2017 election provided a direct referen- dum on Chancellor Angela Merkel’s stance on refugee resettlement,2 espe- cially within eastern districts where demonstrations against immigrants and asylum seekers continued to erupt.3 Thus, by stoking mass anxiety over migra- tion and leaving its Eurosceptic roots behind, the AfD sought a new strategy to secure its place on the national stage in the 2017 Bundestag election. -
Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations
Contributions to the Measurement of Public Opinion in Subpopulations Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Sozialwissenschaen vorgelegt von Simon Munzert an der Sektion Politik – Recht – Wirtscha Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenscha Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ þÉ. Juli óþÕ¢ Õ. Referent: Prof. Dr. Susumu Shikano, Universitat¨ Konstanz ó. Referent: Prof. Dr. Peter Selb, Universitat¨ Konstanz ì. Referent: Prof. Michael D. Ward, PhD, Duke University Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System (KOPS) URL: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-0-296799 To Stefanie Acknowledgments I would not have been able to write and nish this dissertation without the help and support of many people. First of all, I want to thank my collaborators, Peter Selb and Paul Bauer, for their great work and support. eir contributions to the research presented in this thesis are of no small concern. e single papers received manifold and invaluable feedback over the course of their cre- ation. In particular, Peter Selb and I are grateful to Michael Herrmann, omas Hinz, Winfried Pohlmeier, Susumu Shikano as well as the editors and reviewers of Political Analysis for helpful comments and support. is work was also supported by the Center for Quantitative Methods and Survey Research at the University of Konstanz. e second paper that I wrote together with Paul Bauer also got valuable support. We are grateful to Delia Baldassarri for providing materials of her and Andrew Gelman’s analysis to us. We give the raters of the ALLBUS survey items our most sincere thanks for their contribution. Furthermore, we thank Klaus Armingeon, Matthias Fatke, Markus Freitag, Birte Gundelach, Daniel Stegmuller,¨ Richard Traunmuller¨ and Eva Zeglovits for helpful comments on previ- ous versions of this paper. -
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page. -
Zweitstimmenanteile in Den Wahlkreisen Nach Parteien
Arbeitstabellen für die Bundestagswahl 2017 7 Endgültige Zweitstimmenanteile in den Wahlkreisen nach Parteien Stimmen- Lfd. Nr. Wkr. Nr. Wahlkreisbezeichnung Land anteil CDU 1 032 Cloppenburg – Vechta NI 53,1 2 031 Mittelems NI 49,4 3 126 Borken II NW 47,0 4 202 Bitburg RP 44,5 5 127 Coesfeld – Steinfurt II NW 44,0 6 124 Steinfurt I – Borken I NW 43,9 7 292 Biberach BW 43,1 8 025 Unterems NI 42,4 9 147 Hochsauerlandkreis NW 41,7 10 112 Kleve NW 41,6 11 200 Mosel/Rhein-Hunsrück RP 41,6 12 137 Paderborn – Gütersloh III NW 40,7 13 149 Olpe – Märkischer Kreis I NW 40,6 14 198 Ahrweiler RP 40,6 15 038 Osnabrück-Land NI 40,4 16 130 Warendorf NW 40,3 17 276 Odenwald – Tauber BW 39,8 18 089 Heinsberg NW 39,5 19 288 Waldshut BW 39,3 20 174 Fulda HE 39,0 21 030 Stade I – Rotenburg II NI 38,9 22 294 Ravensburg BW 38,9 23 029 Cuxhaven – Stade II NI 38,5 24 131 Gütersloh I NW 38,4 25 002 Nordfriesland – Dithmarschen Nord SH 38,3 26 197 Neuwied RP 38,2 27 270 Aalen – Heidenheim BW 38,2 28 111 Viersen NW 38,1 29 285 Rottweil – Tuttlingen BW 38,0 30 295 Zollernalb – Sigmaringen BW 38,0 31 033 Diepholz – Nienburg I NI 37,9 32 273 Rastatt BW 37,9 33 128 Steinfurt III NW 37,8 34 199 Koblenz RP 37,8 35 286 Schwarzwald-Baar BW 37,8 36 035 Rotenburg I – Heidekreis NI 37,7 37 204 Montabaur RP 37,5 38 136 Höxter – Lippe II NW 37,3 39 203 Trier RP 37,3 40 280 Calw BW 37,2 41 284 Offenburg BW 37,1 42 293 Bodensee BW 37,1 43 291 Ulm BW 37,0 44 044 Celle – Uelzen NI 36,6 45 099 Oberbergischer Kreis NW 36,5 46 298 St. -
Paul Schmitthenner García Roig El Albañil Desconocido
CUADERNO DE NOTAS 11 p a u l s c h m i t t h e n n e r José Manuel Paul Schmitthenner García Roig El albañil desconocido Un recorrido por su biografía, comentarios a tres textos fundamentales y traducción de su conferen- cia La belleza descansa en el orden pronunciada en 1952 Schmitthenner, el arquitecto y su época La figura y la obra. Una intro- En efecto, el recorrido por la biografía ducción y la obra de Paul Schmitthenner (1884-1972) muestra aspectos de un Dentro de la arquitectura moderna interés excepcional, no sólo circuns- Paul Schmitthenner es conocido critos a su ferviente aplicación a sobre todo por su adscripción a las determinadas tareas implícitas en el corrientes más conservadoras y tradi- amplísimo Movimiento para la cionalistas de la arquitectura alema- Reforma de la Vida o na durante los años de la República Lebensreformbewegung del Período de Weimar; por enfrentarse en prime- Guillermino (1888-1918). Supone, ra línea de combate en esos años a además, un acercamiento imprescin- las tendencias más vanguardistas del dible para la comprensión de los ava- momento. Después, por saludar con tares que experimenta el debate gran entusiasmo la llegada al poder, arquitectónico a lo largo del siglo XX, en 1933, del Partido Nacional- al menos por lo que concierne a sus Socialista, en cuyas filas militó. Pero dos primeros tercios. Porque, sin ceñirse sólo a esta vertiente de su necesidad de caer en el tópico, esos vida ofrece, como veremos, un perfil avatares arquitectónicos se encuen- parcial y deformado de su figura dada tran ligados, si se observa la repercu- la proyección e importancia que su sión que alcanzan en el conjunto de obra alcanza en determinadas cues- la obra de Schmitthenner, a las con- tiones que afectan a la teoría y prác- diciones ideológicas y políticas de la tica de la arquitectura contemporá- historia de Alemania y, en conse- nea.