DOCSLIB.ORG

Generative Mechanisms of Turkish - American Defense Relations: 1973-1980, a Critical Realist Approach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GENERATIVE MECHANISMS OF TURKISH - AMERICAN DEFENSE RELATIONS: 1973-1980, A CRITICAL REALIST APPROACH A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MUSTAFA TANER IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS FEBRUARY 2021 Approval of the thesis: GENERATIVE MECHANISMS OF TURKISH-AMERICAN DEFENSE REATIONS: 1973-1980, A CRITICAL REALIST APPROACH submitted by MUSTAFA TANER in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Oktay TANRISEVER Head of Department Department of International Relations Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tuba ÜNLÜ BİLGİÇ Supervisor Department of International Relations Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Hasan ÜNAL (Head of the Examining Committee) Maltepe University Department of Political Science and International Relations Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tuba ÜNLÜ BİLGİÇ (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University Department of International Relations Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gözde YILMAZ Atılım University Department of International Relations Assoc. Prof. Dr. Zerrin TORUN Middle East Technical University Department of International Relations Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU Middle East Technical University Department of International Relations I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Mustafa TANER Signature: iii ABSTRACT GENERATIVE MECHANISMS OF TURKISH - AMERICAN DEFENSE RELATIONS: 1973-1980 A CRITICAL REALIST ANALYSIS TANER, Mustafa Ph.D., The Department of International Relations Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tuba ÜNLÜ BİLGİÇ February 2021, 233 pages The Turkish-American relations hit a hard bottom in 1974 and then enjoyed a high level of cooperation with the DECA of 1980. This thesis explores how bilateral relations evolved from a conflictual level to a high level of cooperation in just six years and the causal mechanisms that induced change in bilateral relations. In doing so, it targets to find out causal mechanisms of the Turkish-American defense relations during one of the most turbulent periods of this relationship. In order to solve this puzzle, a causation theory based on Aristotelian four causes typology was applied. Accordingly, structural, agential, material and ideational causes that produce the major milestones of the said relations in the studied period were analyzed in the light of the scientific realist philosophy. Hence, the study reviews the arms embargo imposed upon Turkey in 1975, the removal of that embargo in 1978, and the signature of the Defense and Economic Cooperation Agreement in 1980 based on the declassified official US foreign policy documents. Keywords: Embargo, DECA, Turkish-American Relations, Defense Industrial Cooperation iv ÖZ TÜRK-AMERİKAN SAVUNMA İLİŞKİLERİNİ ÜRETEN MEKANİZMALAR: 1973-1980, BİLİMSEL GERÇEKÇİ BİR YAKLAŞIM TANER, Mustafa Doktora, Uluslararası İlişkiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Tuba ÜNLÜ BİLGİÇ Şubat 2021, 233 sayfa Türk-Amerikan ilişkileri 1974'te sert bir dibe vuruş yaşadıktan sonra, 1980 yılına gelindiğinde Savunma ve Ekonomik İşbirliği Anlaşması ile yüksek düzeyde bir işbirliğine sahip olmuştur. Dolayısıyla bu tez, ikili ilişkilerin sadece altı yıl içinde çatışma düzeyinden yüksek düzeyde bir işbirliğine nasıl dönüştüğünü incelemeyi ve ikili ilişkilerde değişimi üreten mekanizmaları ortaya çıkarmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu amaçla, Aristo’nun dört neden öğretisine dayalı olarak geliştirilmiş olan bir nedensellik teorisi uygulanmış; incelenen dönemde söz konusu ilişkilerin temel kilometre taşlarını oluşturan olaylar, 1975 yılında uygulanan ambargo, 1978 yılında ambargonun kaldırılması ve 1980 yılında Savunma ve Ekonomik İşbirliği Anlaşması'nın imzalanması, yapısal, amil, maddi ve fikirsel nedenler bağlamında incelenmiştir. Araştırma, temel olarak ABD’nin gizliliği kaldırılmış diplomatik yazışma ve resmi dış politika belgelerine dayanmaktadır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Ambargo, SEIA, Türk-Amerikan İlişkileri, Savunma Sanayii İşbirliği v To my wife Asude Başat. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my most profound appreciation to my supervisor, Assoc. Prof. Tuba ÜNLÜ BİLGİÇ who graciously spared her time to guide me with her knowledge and wisdom. I am also deeply indebted to Prof. Hüseyin BAĞCI who encouraged and supported me to embark on this topic for my doctoral dissertation in the first place. Likewise, I would like to extend my sincere thanks to other members of the dissertation committee; Dr. Bestami Bilgiç, Prof. Hasan Ali Karasar, and Assoc. Prof. Gözde Yılmaz, whose insightful guidance and remarks proved indispensable. Among many scholars to have inspired me to pursue a Ph.D. in international relations, I remember with great respect the late Professor Mehmet GÖNLÜBOL, who was gracious enough to supervise my Master's thesis many years ago at the Faculty of Political Science (Mülkiye). He was the one to have insisted that I should definitely continue with my studies and seek to obtain a doctoral degree. I also feel grateful for the advice freely dispensed by other scholars along the way: Prof. Meliha Altunışık, Prof. Nuri Yurdusev, Prof. İlhan UZGEL, Prof. Faruk YALVAÇ, Prof. Özlem TÜR, Assoc. Prof. Pınar Bedirhanoğlu, Assoc. Prof. Fatih Tayfur, and Dr. Kazım Ateş contributed in a major way by widening my perspective. I would also like to express my gratitude to my colleagues and superiors who were very supportive of my academic endeavors during my tenure at the Undersecretariat for Defence Industries (SSM), where I have worked for more than twenty years. In particular, Undersecretary Dr. Veysel YAYAN, genuinely encouraged and supported me to study this subject. Similarly, Dr. Sıtkı EGELİ who was my immediate superior at SSM more than two decades ago, hugely contributed to my grasp and apprehension of the circumstances and complexities surrounding defense markets and policies. Dr. Egeli has graciously spared his time to provide remarks and insights for this doctoral vii dissertation. Likewise, I feel indebted to Dr. Oğuz Hamşioğlu, who kept constant watch on my work and its many tasks. Finally, very special thanks to my wife Asude BAŞAT. She has been extremely supportive of me throughout this entire process with her love, encouragement and patience. viii TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM ..........................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. IV ÖZ ............................................................................................................................. V ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................... VII TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................... IX LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................. XII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................... XIII CHAPTERS 1.INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Research Question ........................................................................................... 1 1.2. Methodology ................................................................................................... 2 1.3. Organization of the Dissertation: .................................................................... 5 2. APPLYING THE THEORY OF CAUSATION TO TURKISH-AMERICAN RELATIONS ............................................................................................................. 9 2.1. Scientific Realism: ........................................................................................ 10 2.2. The Theory of Causation ............................................................................... 20 2.3. Conclusions ................................................................................................... 31 3. A CONCISE SUMMARY OF TURKISH-AMERICAN DEFENCE COOPERATION (1973-1980): ............................................................................... 33 3.1. Nixon, Ford and Kissinger ............................................................................ 33 3.2. Carter, Cyrus Vance and Brzezinski ............................................................. 34 3.3. A Summary of US-Turkey Relations Between 1973-1980 .......................... 36 3.4. Conclusions ................................................................................................... 42 4. THE ROAD TOWARDS THE EMBARGO ....................................................... 43 4.1. Cyprus Intervention and the Arms Embargo: ............................................... 50 4.2. The Divide between the US Administration and the Congress regarding Turkey .................................................................................................................. 54 ix 4.3. US Security Policy Toward Turkey .............................................................
Recommended publications
  • Açiklamali Yönetim Zamandizini 1940 – 1949

    Açiklamali Yönetim Zamandizini 1940 – 1949

    Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi : 3 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İdare Tarihi Araştırması (TİDATA) AÇIKLAMALI YÖNETİM ZAMANDİZİNİ 1940 – 1949 Birgül Ayman GÜLER (Editör) Tekin AVANER Sonay Bayramoğlu ÖZUĞURLU Tayfun ÇINAR Can Umut ÇİNER Esra DİK Bülent DURU Nuray Ertürk KESKİN Ceren KALFA Barış ÖVGÜN Menaf TURAN Ankara, Aralık 2008 (c) AÜ SBF KAYAUM, Birgül A. Güler (Ed.) Açıklamalı Yönetim Zamandizini: 1940-1949 Türkiye Cumhuriyeti İdare Tarihi Araştırması (TİDATA) AÜ SBF Kamu Yönetimi Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi : 3 Ankara, 2008 Prof. Dr. Birgül Ayman GÜLER Araştırma Yöneticisi Tekin Avaner, Araştırma Yönetici Yrd. Yrd. Doç. Dr. Sonay Bayramoğlu ÖZUĞURLU Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tayfun ÇINAR Yrd. Doç. Dr. Nuray Ertürk KESKİN Dr. Bülent DURU Dr. Ceren KALFA Dr. Menaf TURAN Can Umut ÇİNER Esra DİK Barış ÖVGÜN ISBN: 978-975-482-799-6 1.Kamu Yönetimi 2. Türk İdare Tarihi 3. Cumhuriyet Tarihi 4. Yönetim Zamandizini I. Güler, Birgül Ayman (Ed.), II. Açıklamalı Yönetim Zamandizini: 1940-1949 Yayına Hazırlama: Serpil Hoşafçı Kapak Tasarım: Fikret Sarı Baskı Yeri: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi İncitaşı Sokak No: 10 06510 Beşevler / Ankara Tel: 0312 - 213 66 55 Basım Tarihi: 01.03.2009 Yayın Yeri: AÜ Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi KAYAUM Müdürlüğü Cebeci – Ankara Tel: (0312) 595 12 85 Eposta: [email protected] Site: http://kayaum.politics.ankara.edu.tr Bu çalışma Ankara Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Müdürlüğünce desteklenmiş ve Temmuz 2007- Aralık 2008 tarihleri arasında yürütülmüştür.
  • German “Rationalisierung” on the S Turkish Shop Floor∗

    German “Rationalisierung” on the S Turkish Shop Floor∗

    IRSH (), pp. – doi:./S © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/./), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Experts, Exiles, and Textiles: German “Rationalisierung” on the s Turkish Shop Floor∗ G ÖRKEM A KGÖZ Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin re:work (IGK Work and Human Life Cycle in Global History) Georgenstr. , Berlin, Germany E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: In the wake of the Great Depression, in the early s the Turkish state decided to undertake an ambitious project of industrialization. Though state factories were presented and celebrated as model institutions of national modernity, their opera- tions were characterized from the outset by serious and chronic problems of ineffi- ciency and low productivity. To secure technical and managerial know-how on the shop floor, the Turkish state approached knowledgeable German industrial managers to organize its industrial production rationally, hoping to take advantage of the increas- ingly repressive political climate in Germany, which was driving leading experts into exile. This article analyses the transfer of scientific management from the German industrial context, with its craft control of the labour process and predominance of skilled labour with a strong labour movement, to Turkey, with its army of unskilled, cheap, and unorganized labour and where industrial development was in its infancy. INTRODUCTION In the transatlantic transfer of scientific management, the German case stands as a notable example of adaptation. Rather like their European counterparts, ∗ I am sincerely grateful to Aad Blok, Lars Christensen, Richard Croucher, Silke Neunsinger, ̇ Georges Khalil, Marcel van der Linden, Nurçin Ileri, Karsten Uhl, Pieter Verstraete, and my col- leagues at re:work for their insightful comments on earlier versions of this article.
  • Ata 589 Selected Topics in Turkish Political Thought: Experimenting with Population in Early Republican Turkey

    Ata 589 Selected Topics in Turkish Political Thought: Experimenting with Population in Early Republican Turkey

    Ata 589 Selected Topics in Turkish Political Thought: Experimenting With Population in Early Republican Turkey ATA 589 (3 cr) Dr. M. Asım Karaömerlioğlu Fall 2014 Atatürk Enstitüsü #16 ATA Seminar Room Phone: 359 6646 Thursday 678 Email:[email protected] The interest in population issues has never been a contemporary issue of our times. From around the late 19th century through the interwar years, deep concern for population issues can widely be observed in many parts of the world. Indeed, these issues became almost an obsession of public, political and academic debates all around the world. In the age of nationalist rivalry, imperialism, alarming decline of women’s fertility in certain countries and the population catastrophe that World War I imposed made elites all over the world took up population issues and integrated them as essential parts of their social and political projects. During the war, some 15 million people, mostly men, perished. In France, for example, one in ten males died during the war. In the crisis atmosphere of the postwar era when revolutions, insurrections, civil wars, forced migrations, labor unrests and, above all, the dissolution of state authorities swept most parts of the globe while disease, epidemics, famine, the increasing rate of male suicides led to unprecedented social catastrophes, not to mention the Spanish influenza of 1918 killing around 50 million people, more than three times caused by the war. This course focuses on population related issues in early Republican Turkey within a comparative perspective. Just like the cases elsewhere, by the turn of the 20th century, the Turkish elites were obsessed with the improvement of the quality and quantity of their populations.
  • Gc(09)/Inf/82

    Gc(09)/Inf/82

    International Atomic Energy Agency GC(IX)/INF/82 17 September 1965 General Conference GENERAL Distr. ENGLISH only Ninth Regular Session DELEGATIONS Information received by noon on 15 September 1965 CONTENTS Pages I. States A. Member States 3 B. Non-Member States 31 II, Organizations A. United Nations and specialized agencies 32 B. Intergovernmental organizations 33 C. Non-governmental organizations having 34 consultative status with the Agency ANNEX: Addresses I. States II. Organizations An asterisk following the name of a participant indicates that his wife is present in Tokyo, REQUESTS FOR CHANGES IN SUBSEQUENT EDITIONS OF THIS LIST SHOULD BE ADDRESSED TO THE PROTOCOL OFFICE IN WRITING. 65-5760 GC(IX)/lHP/82 page 3 STATES A. LIMBER STATES AFGHANISTAN ALBANIA ALG^HTA ARGENTINA Delegates Rear-Admiral Oscar A. QUIHILLALT * Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission! Governor from Argentina on the Board of Governors £Lksraai&J Professor Mario E. BANCORA * Director, Atcciic Energy Commission! Alternate to the Governor Adviser? Mr. Carlos G. LOUGE Third Secretary, the Embassy in Japan AUSTRALIA Delegate; Sir Philip BAXTER, K.B.E<., C.M.G. Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission! Governor from Australia on the Board of Governors Alternates J- Mr. A.B. THOMAS Head, International Relations Section, Atomic Energy Commission GC(IX)/INF/82 page 4 Mr- Ro do FERCIVAL First Secretary, the Embassy in Japan Mr. P. F. PETERS * First Secretary? the Embassy in Japan Mr. G. Ao CHANDLER Executive Assistants International Relations Section, Atomic Energy Commission AUSTRIA Relegates H.E, Dr. Heinrich HAYMERLE Minister1 Plenipotentiary, Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs Alternates Mr. Richard POLACZEK Director, Federax Chancellery Advisers Dr.
  • HALİL Erdemirdecember 2001- February 2002 / Vol

    HALİL Erdemirdecember 2001- February 2002 / Vol

    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS December 2001- February 2002 / Vol. - VI Num.4 THE ORIGIN OF THE CYPRUS QUESTION: THE BRITISH POLICY ON THE CREATION OF CYPRUS REPUBLIC HALİL ERDEMİR Halil Erdemir is a PhD candidate and tutor in the Department of Politics, University of Wales Swansea. INTRODUCTION Cyprus holds an important place in the United Kingdom’s foreign policy. There was a rather complex situation in Cyprus during the 1950s; the Greeks tried for enosis (the union of Cyprus with Greece), the Turks resisted, arguing either for the status quo or for taksim (partition), while Britain tried to quit the Island with the exception of keeping two air bases. British officials used every opportunity to preserve British influence on the Island. The Cyprus Question was the most difficult issue to the United Kingdom, Greece and Turkey during the second half of the 1950s and it disturbed Turkey’s relations with Greece and the United Kingdom. The Cyprus Question was the creation of the desires and aggression of two conflicting parties: Greece and the United Kingdom. The Greek Cypriots attempted to exclude the Turkish Cypriots from the Island’s political and economic life and directed terrorist actions against British soldiers and Turks on the Island. There was also a potential threat to the southern border of Turkey. An extreme group within the Greek community wanted to achieve enosis through using violence against their neighbouring community. Regarding Turkey and the international community, Cyprus is located in a crucial strategic area and simply cannot be left to any hostile power. Greece possesses the Aegean Islands that encircle Turkey’s border.1 Periodically, Greek terrorists attacked first the British and then Turkish Cypriots, causing difficulty in relations between Greece and Britain.
  • Kıbrıs Politikasının Annan Belgesi Ile Başlayan Kırılma Noktaları Breaking Points in the Cyprus Policy Beginning with the Annan Blueprint

    Kıbrıs Politikasının Annan Belgesi Ile Başlayan Kırılma Noktaları Breaking Points in the Cyprus Policy Beginning with the Annan Blueprint

    Kıbrıs Politikasının Annan Belgesi ile Başlayan Kırılma Noktaları Breaking Points in the Cyprus Policy Beginning with the Annan Blueprint Ahmet Zeki Bulunç* Özet Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığı Yunanistan’ın “Kıbrıs Halkına” self-determinasyon hakkı verilmesi ama- cıyla 1954 yılında Birleşmiş Milletlere yaptığı başvuruyla birlikte uluslararası bir nitelik kazanarak evreler halinde günümüze kadar devam etmiştir. Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığının temelinde Yunanistan’ın ve Rumların ENOSİS (Kıbrıs’ın Yunanistan’a ilhakı) mücadelesi vardır. Türkiye’nin bu mücadeleye karşı izlediği politika, Kıbrıs Türk halkının güvenlik ve huzur içinde siyasi eşit, egemen bir halk olarak yaşaması, Ada’nın kendine karşı kullanılabilecek bir konuma getirilmemesi ve Türk-Yunan dengesi- nin korunması ilkelerine dayanmaktadır. Annan Belgesi’nin taraflara sunulmasından sonra yen Türk hükümetinin uyguladığı AB odaklı ve inisiyatifli yeni politika nedeniyle Kıbrıs politikasında kırılmalar meydana gelmiştir. Özel- likle Türk hükümetince, Annan Belgesi’nin kabul edilmesi ve KKTC halkına kabul ettirmesi temel bir kırılma noktasını teşkil etmektedir. Bu arada Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi’nin (AİHM) Loizidou Davası Kararının, AB Konseyi’nin 17 Aralık 2004 Brüksel Zirve Kararı’nın ve dolayısıyla Ek Protokolün, 3 Ekim 2005 Müzakere Çerçeve Belgesi’nin kabulü Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığında Türkiye aleyhinde çok ciddi kırılma noktaları olmuştur. Söz konusu kırılma noktalarından sonraki süreçte T.C. Dışişleri Bakanlığı’nın Ocak 2006 Akademik Bakış Eylem Planı, Gambari Anlaşması (8 Temmuz 2006 süreci), 2006 Fin Önerileri’nin ilke olarak 73 kabul edilmesi, Türkiye’nin Kıbrıs politikası’nda ve tezlerinde verdiği önemli tavizler olarak değerlen- Cilt 1, Sayı 1 dirilmektedir. Kış 2007 Kasım 2002 tarihinden itibaren Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığı konusunda Türkiye Hükümetleri’nin uyguladıkları politikalar temel hatalar ve yanlışlar içermektedir. Bu politikaların bir sonucu olarak Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinde ciddi bir tıkanma olmuş ve Kıbrıs uyuşmazlığı Güney Kıbrıs Rum Yönetimi -Yunanistan inisiyatifinde tam bir uzlaşmazlığa sürüklenmiştir.
  • Yolsuzluk Ve Usulsüzlük Olaylarinin Türk Siyasetine Yansimalari (1923–1950)

    Yolsuzluk Ve Usulsüzlük Olaylarinin Türk Siyasetine Yansimalari (1923–1950)

    YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜK OLAYLARININ TÜRK SİYASETİNE YANSIMALARI (1923–1950) Erkan AFŞAR Doktora Tezi Tarih Anabilim Dalı Prof. Dr. Selami KILIÇ 2013 Her Hakkı Saklıdır T.C. ATATÜRK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİM DALI Erkan AFŞAR YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜK OLAYLARININ TÜRK SİYASETİNE YANSIMALARI (1923–1950) DOKTORA TEZİ TEZ YÖNETİCİSİ Prof. Dr. Selami KILIÇ ERZURUM–2013 I İÇİNDEKİLER ÖZET ............................................................................................................................... V ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................. VI ÖNSÖZ ......................................................................................................................... VII KISALTMALAR ........................................................................................................... X EKLER LİSTESİ ......................................................................................................... XI GİRİŞ ............................................................................................................................... 1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM TEK PARTİLİ DÖNEMDE YAPILAN YOLSUZLUK VE USULSÜZLÜKLER 1.1.BAHRİYE VEKİLİ İHSAN (ERYAVUZ) BEY DAVASI ( 1927–1928) ........ 23 1.1.1. İhsan Eryavuz’un Hayatı ............................................................................ 24 1.1.2. Bahriye Vekâletinin Kurulması .................................................................. 24 1.1.3. İsmet Paşa ile
  • 1 Creating Turkishness: an Examination of Turkish Nationalism Through Gök-Börü Güldeniz Kibris Sabanci University Spring 20

    1 Creating Turkishness: an Examination of Turkish Nationalism Through Gök-Börü Güldeniz Kibris Sabanci University Spring 20

    CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS SABANCI UNIVERSITY SPRING 2005 1 CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ By GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabanci University Spring 2005 2 CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ APPROVED BY: Assoc. Prof. Halil Berktay (Thesis Supervisor) ........................................................ Asst. Prof. Y. Hakan Erdem ....................................................... Asst. Prof. E. Burak Arıkan ......................................................... DATE OF APPROVAL: 12 August 2005 3 © GÜLDEN İZ KIBRIS 2005 All Rights Reserved 4 Abstract CREATING TURKISHNESS: AN EXAMINATION OF TURKISH NATIONALISM THROUGH GÖK-BÖRÜ Güldeniz Kıbrıs History, M.A. Thesis Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Halil Berktay 2005, ix + 113 pages This M.A. thesis attempts to exhibit the cross-fertilization between the Pan- Turkist and Kemalist varieties of Turkish nationalism through their definitions of ‘Turkishness.’ In the same vein with contemporary nationalisms, the late Ottoman/Republican nationalist elite created ‘Turkishness’ by referring to a mythical past. In that creation process, the Pan-Turkist and Kemalist nationalist discourses historically developed in the same pool and used similar intellectual sources. Though their ultimate goals were different, the two varieties scrutinized very similar racist and nationalist references in their imaginations of Turkish identity as racially superior. In the name of revealing the similarities and differences, a Pan-Turkist journal, Gök-Börü [Grey Wolf] has been examined. Published and edited by Reha Oğuz Türkkan, the journal appeared between 1942 and 1943 as a byproduct of the special aggressive international environment.
  • Tarih Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başlangiçtan Bugüne Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümetleri

    Tarih Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Başlangiçtan Bugüne Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümetleri

    T.C. KÜLTÜR VE TURİZM BAKANLIĞI TÜRKİYE KÜLTÜR PORTALI PROJESİ TARİH TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ BAŞLANGIÇTAN BUGÜNE TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ HÜKÜMETLERİ Prof. Dr. Abdulhaluk Mehmet ÇAY 2009 ANKARA 6.8. Başlangıçtan Bugüne Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümetleri Muvakkat İcra Encümeni (25 Nisan 1920-3 Mayıs 1920) İcra Vekilleri Heyeti Reisi Mustafa Kemal Paşa, TBMM Reisi Celalettin Arif Bey, Erzurum Cami Bey (Baykut), Aydın Bekir Sami Bey (Kunduh), Amasya Hamdullah Suphi Bey (Tanrıöver), Antalya Hakkı Behiç Bey (Bayiç), Denizli İsmet Bey (İnönü), Edirne I. İcra Vekilleri Heyeti “1. TBMM Hükümeti” (Mustafa Kemal Paşa) (3 Mayıs 1920-24 Ocak 1921) Bakanlığı Adı Soyadı Seçim Bölgesi İcra Vekilleri Heyeti Reisi Mustafa Kemal Paşa (Başbakan) Umuru Şeriye Vekili Mustafa Fehmi Efendi Bursa (Diyanet Bakanı) (Gerçeker) Cami Bey (Baykut) Aydın Dahiliye Umuru Vekili Hakkı Behiç Bey (Bayiç) Denizli (İçişleri Bakanı) Nazım Bey (Resmor) Tokat Refet Bey (Bele) İzmir Adliye Vekili Celalettin Arif Bey Erzurum 2 (Adalet Bakanı) Nafıa Vekili İsmail Fazıl Paşa (Cebesoy) Yozgat (Bayındırlık Bakanı) Ömer Lütfü Bey (Argeşo) Amasya Hariciye Vekili Bekir Sami Bey (Kunduh) Amasya (Dışişleri Bakanı) Sıhhiye ve Muavenet-i İçtimaiye Vekili Adnan Bey (Adıvar) İstanbul (Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Bakanı) İktisat Vekili Yusuf Kemal Bey (Tengirşenk) Kastamonu (Ekonomi Bakanı) Müdafaa-i Milliye Vekili Fevzi Paşa (Çakmak) Kozan (Milli Savunma Bakanı) Bakanlığı Adı Soyadı Seçim Bölgesi Erkân-ı Harbiye-i Umumiye Vekili İsmet Bey (İnönü) Edirne (Genelkurmay Başkanı) Maliye Vekili Hakkı Behiç Bey
  • Birinci Bölüm Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’Nun Çocukluğu, Gençliği Ve Memuriyeti A

    Birinci Bölüm Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’Nun Çocukluğu, Gençliği Ve Memuriyeti A

    TC SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ TARİH ANABİLİMDALI FATİN RÜŞTÜ ZORLU DOKTORA TEZİ HAVVA ELTETİK TEZ DANIŞMANI: PROF. DR. BAYRAM KODAMAN ISPARTA 2009 ÖZET Fatin Rüştü Zorlu Havva ELTETİK Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Tarih Bölümü, Doktora Tezi, 266 sayfa, Aralık 2009. Danışman: Prof. Dr. Bayram KODAMAN Fatin Rüştü Zorlu 1910 yılında İstanbul’da doğmuştur. 1932 yılında Dışişleri Bakanlığı Meslek Memurluğu sınavını kazanarak çalışma hayatına başlamıştır. 1954 yılında Çanakkale’den Milletvekili seçilmiş, Devlet Bakanı ve Başbakan Yardımcısı olarak etkin bir görevle siyasi hayatına başlamıştır. 1957 yılında Dışişleri Bakanlığı görevine getirilmiştir. Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’nun siyaset yaptığı dönemde 1950 yılında iktidar olan Demokrat Parti idaresi bulunuyordu. On yıl iktidar hizmeti yürüten DP 27 Mayıs 1960 Darbesi ile hükümetten düşmüştür. Böylece Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’nun üç yıl süren Dışişleri Bakanlığı devresi sona ermiştir. Zorlu, darbe sonrasında Yassıada Mahkemesince yargılanarak idama mahkûm edilmiştir. Fatin Rüştü Zorlu görev yaptığı dönemde önemli başarılara imza atmış bir devlet adamıdır. Çalışmamızın amacı, Türk Siyaset Tarihinde oldukca sancılı yılları teşkil eden bu dönemde Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’nun devlet adamlığını, siyasi kişiliğini, dış politika felsefesini ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmamız Fatin Rüştü Zorlu’nun kişiliği etrafında bu kritik döneme ışık tutacaktır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Fatin Rüştü Zorlu, Demokrat Parti, 27 Mayıs Darbesi, Yassıada Mahkemesi. I ABSTRACT Fatin Rüştü Zorlu Havva ELTETİK Suleyman Demirel Unıversity, Department of History Ph. D, 266 pages, December 2009. Supervising Professor: Bayram KODAMAN Fatin Rüştü Zorlu was born in İstanbul in 1910. He began his career in 1932 after passing his examination on Civil Service in the Foreign Ministry. In 1954 he was elected a member of Parliament by Çanakkale, after which he held important position as State Minister and Vice Prime Minister.
  • Cumhuriyet Döneminde Başbakanlar: Sosyo-Ekonomik Geçmişleri, Siyasal Düşünceleri Ve Performanslari

    Cumhuriyet Döneminde Başbakanlar: Sosyo-Ekonomik Geçmişleri, Siyasal Düşünceleri Ve Performanslari

    T.C. SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ KAMU YÖNETİMİ ANABİLİM DALI CUMHURİYET DÖNEMİNDE BAŞBAKANLAR: SOSYO-EKONOMİK GEÇMİŞLERİ, SİYASAL DÜŞÜNCELERİ VE PERFORMANSLARI Burcu SARAÇOĞLU YÜKSEK LİSANS TEZİ Danışman Doç. Dr. Mehmet Akif ÇUKURÇAYIR Konya 2009 İÇİNDEKİLER Sayfa No BİLİMSEL ETİK SAYFASI.......................................................................v TEZ KABUL FORMU……………………………………………………vi ÖZET...........................................................................................................vii ABSTRACT................................................................................................viii KISALTMALAR.........................................................................................ix GİRİŞ...........................................................................................................1 BİRİNCİ BÖLÜM CUMHURİYET DÖNEMİNDE SİYASAL SİSTEM ve BAŞBAKANLIK KURUMU 1.1. Cumhuriyet Döneminde Siyasal Sistem…................…..........…......…..3 1.1.1. 1924 Anayasası…...……………………........……..........………4 1.1.2. 1961 Anayasası…………………………………..................…...7 1.1.3. 1982 Anayasası………………………………......................…...9 1.2. Başbakan Kimdir ve Görevleri Nelerdir.................................................10 1.2.1. Başbakan Kimdir?........................................................................10 1.2.2. Başbakan’ın Görev ve Sorumlulukları………………….............11 ii İKİNCİ BÖLÜM CUMHURİYET DÖNEMİNDE BAŞBAKANLAR: SOSYO- EKONOMİK GEÇMİŞLERİ, SİYASAL DÜŞÜNCELERİ ve PERFORMANSLARI
  • Social Sciences Studies Journal

    Social Sciences Studies Journal

    International SOCIAL SCIENCES STUDIES JOURNAL SSSjournal (ISSN:2587-1587) Economics and Administration, Tourism and Tourism Management, History, Culture, Religion, Psychology, Sociology, Fine Arts, Engineering, Architecture, Language, Literature, Educational Sciences, Pedagogy & Other Disciplines in Social Sciences Vol:5, Issue:47 pp.5806-5819 2019 sssjournal.com ISSN:2587-1587 [email protected] Article Arrival Date (Makale Geliş Tarihi) 03/09/2019 The Published Rel. Date (Makale Yayın Kabul Tarihi) 22/10/2019 Published Date (Makale Yayın Tarihi) 22.10.2019 THE PROBLEMATIC OF THEORY-PRACTICE IN HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF TURKISH FOREIGN POLICY TÜRK DIŞ POLİTİKASININ TARİHSEL EVRİMİNDE TEORİ-PRATİK SORUNSALI Dr. Bülent AKKUŞ Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, Department of Political Science and International Relations, , Istanbul/TURKEY ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1779-9851 Res. Asst. Yeliz YAZAN KOÇ Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Istanbul/TURKEY Article Type : Research Article/ Araştırma Makalesi Doi Number : http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1816 Reference : Akkuş, B. & Yazan Koç, Y. (2019). “The Problematic Of Theory-Practice In Historical Evolution Of Turkish Foreign Policy”, International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(47): 5806-5819. ÖZ The foreign policy realm is the most delicate area for states. It is a realm where in theory states contact or enter into positive or negative relations with their equals. In practice, however, it is a realm where states carry out such relations, exchanges on the basis of cooperation or conflict with other states and even non-state actors in an unofficial hierarchy. Given its importance, the foreign policy-diplomacy realm calls for a theoretical framework, orientation and targeting.