World Architecture 1900-2000: a Critical Mosaic Volume 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

World Architecture 1900-2000: a Critical Mosaic Volume 3 WORLD ARCHITECTURE 1900-2000: A CRITICAL MOSAIC VOLUME 3 NORTHERN EUROPE, CENTRAL EUROPE AND WESTERN EUROPE General Editor: Kenneth Frampton Volume Editor: Wilfried Wang bifid 3225 CHINA ARCHITECTURE & BUILDING PRESS SpringerWienNewYork CONTENTS Complimentary Remarks by Sara Topelson de Grinberg, Past President of the International Union of Architects (UIA) XI Complimentary Remarks by Vassilis Sgoutas, President of the International Union of Architects (UIA) XII Complimentary Remarks by Ye Rutang, President of the Architectural Society of China (ASC) - A Recrord of 20th Century World Architecture XII General Introduction by Kenneth Frampton XIV Introductory Essay by Wilfried Wang XVH Selected Buildings (in chronological order of years of design) 1900-1919 The Stock Exchange, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1885, 1898-1903, arch. Hendrik P. Berlage 4 House of the People, Brussels, Belgium, 1895-1899, arch. Victor Horta 6 Glasgow School of Art, Glasgow, Scotland, 1896-1899, West Wing 1907-1909, arch. Charles Rennie Mackintosh Ernst Ludwig House, Darmstadt, Germany, 1899-1900, arch. Josef Maria Olbrich Hvittrask House, Kikkonummi, Finland, 1901-1903, arch. H. Gesellius, A. Lindgren, E. Saannen St. John's Cathedral, Tampere, Finland, 1902-1907, arch. Lars Sonck Town Hall, Stockholm, Sweden, 1902, 1908-1923, arch. Ragnar Ostberg Post Office Savings Bank, Vienna, Austria, 1903-1906, 1910-1912, arch. Otto Wagner Railway Station, Helsinki, Finland, 1904, 1911-1919, arch. Eliel Saarinen Balasz Villa, Budapest, Hungary, 1905 , arch. Odon Lechner Palais Stoclet, Brussels, Belgium, 1905, 1906-1911, arch. Josef Hoffmann AEG Factory, Berlin, Germany, 1908-1909, arch. Peter Behrens Emile Jaques-Dalcroze Institute for Rhythmic Gymnastics, Hellerau, Germany, 1910, 1911-1912, arch. Heinrich Tessenow Fagus Works, Alfeld, Germany, 1911-1913, arch. Walter Gropius, Adolf Meyer Chemical Factory, Luban, Poland, 1912, arch. Hans Poelzig Centennial Hall, Wroclaw, Poland, 1912-1913, arch. Max Berg Hodek's Apartment, Prague, Czech Republic, 1913, arch. Josef Chochol Town Hall Conversion and Extension, Goteborg , Sweden, 1913, 1934-1937, arch. Erik Gunnar Asplund The Woodland Cemetery, Stockholm, Sweden, 1915, 1926-1934, arch. Erik Gunnar Asplund and Sigurd Lewerentz Eigen Haard Housing Estate, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1917-1920, arch. Michel de Klerk Einstein Tower, Potsdam, Germany, 1919-1921, arch. Erich Mendelsohn 1920-1939 Hradcine, Prague, Czech Republic, 1920-1931, arch Jose Plecnik Garkau Farm, Garkau, Germany, 1924-1925, arch. Hugo Haring 54 Schroder House, Utrecht, Netherlands, 1924-1925, arch. Gerrit Rietveld 56 Town Hall, Hilversum, Netherlands, 1924, 1927-1930, arch. Willem Marinus Dudok 58 Hufeisen-Settlement, Berlin, Germany, 1925, arch. Bruno Taut 60 Bauhaus, Dessau, Germany, 1925-1926, arch. Walter Gropius 62 Weissenhof Settlement, Stuttgart, Germany, 1925-1927, arch. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe 64 Kiefhoeck Housing Estate, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1925-1928, arch. Jacobus Johannes Pieter Oud 66 Zonnestraal Sanatorium, Hilversum, Netherlands, 1926-1928, arch. Johannes Duiker 68 Karl-Marx-Hof-Housing, Vienna, Austria, 1927, arch. Karl Ehn 70 St. Antonius, Basel, Switzerland, 1927, arch. Karl Moser 72 Hotel Avion, Brno, Czech Republic, 1927-1928, arch. Bohuslav Fuchs 76 Romerstadt Settlement Estate, Frankfurt, Germany, 1927-1928, arch. Ernst May et al. 78 Van Nelle Factory, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1927-1929, arch. Michiel Brinkman et al. 82 Victorius Mother of God Votive Church of Saint Roch Parish, Biatystok, Poland, 1927-1944, arch. Oskar Sosnowski 86 Muller House, Prague, Czech Republic, 1928, 1929-1931, arch. Adolf Loos 88 Open Air School, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1928-1930, arch. Johannes Duiker 92 Federal School of the General German Trade Unions, Bernau, Germany, 1928-1930, arch. Hannes Meyer and Hans Wittwer 94 Tugendhat House, Brno, Czech Republic, 1928-1930, arch. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe 98 Machnac Sanatorium, Trencianske Teplice, Slovakia, 1929, 1930-1932, arch. Jaromir Krejcar 102 Dr. Beer House, Vienna, Austria, 1929-1931, arch. Josef Frank, Oskar Wlach and Oskar Wlach 104 Colonnade Bridge, Piest'any, Slovakia, 1929-1931, arch. Emil Bellus 106 Dammann House, Oslo, Norway, 1930-1932, arch. Arne Korsmo 108 Boots' Factory, Nottingham, England, 1930-1933, arch. E. Owen Williams 112 Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark, 1931, 1935-1941, arch. Kay Fisker, 114 C.F. M0llerand Povl Stegrnann Schwandbach Bridge, Hinterfultigen, Switzerland, 1933, eng. Robert Maillart 116 The Bellavista Housing Estate and the Bellevue Theater, Copenhagen, Denmark, 118 1933-1934, 1934-1935, arch. Arne Jacobsen Schunck Department Store, Heerlen, Netherlands, 1933-1935, arch. F. P. Josephus Peutz 122 Highpoint One, London, England, 1933-1935, arch. Berthold Lubetkin 126 Town Planning, Zlin, Czech Republic, 1933-1938, arch. Frantisek Lydie Gahura 128 and Vladimir Karfik Locomotive Factory, Malaxa, Bucharest, Romania, 1936-1938 arch. Horia Creanga 132 Municipal Court Building, Warsaw, Poland, 1936-1939, arch. Bohdan Pniewski 134 Copenhagen Airport, Kastrup, Denmark, 1936, 1937-1939, arch. Vilhelm Lauritzen 136 Workers' Association, Oslo (Norway), 1936, 1938-1940, arch. Ove Bang 138 Villa Mairea, Noormarkku, Finland, 1937-1939, arch. Alvar Aalto 140 Resurrection Chapel, Turku, Finland, 1938, 1939-1941 , arch. Erik Bryggman 142 1940-1959 Stuhmer Factory, Budapest, Hungary, 1941, arch. Olgyay & Olgyay 146 Central Department Store, Warsaw, Poland, : 1946-1950, arch. Zbigniew Ihnatowicz et al. 148 Reconstruction of the Alte Pinakothek, Munich, Germany, 1946- 1973, arch. Hans Dollgast Saynatsalo Town Hall, Saynatsalo, Finland, 1949, 1950-1952, arch. Alvar Aalto St. Anna's Church, Duren, Germany, 1951-1956, arch. Rudolf Schwarz Hochschule fur Gestaltung, Ulm, Germany, 1953-1956, arch. Max Bill Otaniemi University Chapel, Helsinki, Finland, 1954, 1955-1957, arch. Kaija & Heikki Siren Halen Settlement, Bern, Switzerland, 1955-1961, arch. Atelier 5 The Philharmonie, Berlin, Germany, 1956, 1960-1963, arch. Hans Scharoun Orphanage, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1957-1960, arch. Aldo van Eyck Luisiana Museum, Humlebaek, Denmark, 1958-1991, arch. J0rgen Bo & Vilhelm Wohlert 1960-1979 St. Petri Church, Klippan, Sweden, 1962, 1963-1969, arch. Sigurd Lewerentz New National Gallery, Berlin, Germany, 1962-1967, arch. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Crematorium and Urn Grove, Bratislava, Slovakia, 1962-1967, arch. Ferdinand Milucky Hafsteinhus - House at Bakkaflot, Gardahreppur, Iceland, 1963-1967, arch. Hogna Sigurdardottir-Anspach Olympic Stadium, Munich, Germany, 1967-1972, arch Gunther Behnisch with Frei Otto and Leonhardt + Andre St. Willibrord, Waldweiler, Germany, 1968, arch. Heinz Bienefeld Byker Housing, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England, 1968, 1969-1981, arch. Ralph Erskihe Hedmark Cathedral Museum, Hamar, Norway, 1968-1988, arch. Sverre Fehn Medical Faculty, Woluve-St. Lambert, La Meme, Brussels, Belgium, 1969, 1970-1977, arch. Lucien Kroll Kulturhuset - Cultural Center, Stockholm, Sweden, 1970, arch. Peter Celsing Central Beheer Headquarters, Apeldoorn, Netherlands, 1970-1972, arch. Herman Hertzberger Bianchi House, Riva San Vitale, Switzerland, 1971, 1972-1973, arch. Mario Botta Municipal Museum, Monchengladbach, Germany, 1972, 1973-1975, arch. Hans Hollein New Parliament, Bonn, Germany, 1972, 1987-1992, arch. Gunther Behnisch Our Lady of Mount Carmel Church, Firhouse, Ireland, 1976-1978, arch. Shane de Blacam and John Meagher Urban Revitalization of Monte Carasso, Ticino, Switzerland, since 1977, arch. Luigi Snozzi Extension of the Staatsgalerie, Stuttgart, Germany, 1977, 1980-1983, arch. Stirling & Wilford Collino d'Oro School, Montagnola, Switzerland, 1978, 1982-1984, arch. Livio Vacchini 1980-1999 Myyrmaki Church and Parish Center, Helsinki, Finland, 1980, 1982-1984, arch. Juha Leiviska Airport, Stansted, England, 1981, 1987-1990, arch. Norman Foster Salzamt Restaurant, Vienna, Austria, 1981- 1983, arch. Hermann Czech Poleeni Cultural Center, Pieksamaki, Finland, 1982-1989, arch. Kristian Gullichsen et al. HebelstraBe Apartment Building, Basel, Switzerland, 1984-1988, arch. Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron Faculty of Journalism, Eichstatt University, Eichstatt, Germany, 1985-1987, arch. Karljosef Schattner HochstraBe Office Building, Basel, Switzerland, 1986-1988, arch. Diener & Diener Children's Day Care, Berlin, Germany, 1986-1988, arch. Alvaro Siza Braun Factory, Melsungen, Germany, 1986- 1992, arch. James Stirling etal. Kunsthall, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1988, 1990-1992, (arch. OMA 234 Jewish Museum, Berlin, Germany, 1989, 1991-1998, arch. Daniel Libeskind 238 La Congiunta, Giornico, Switzerland, 1990-1993, arch. Peter Markli 242 Academy of Arts and Architecture, Maastricht, Netherlands, 1990-1993, arch. Wiel Arets 244 Waterloo International Terminal, London, England, 1990-1993, arch. Nicholas Grimshaw & Partners 248 Nominatiors' Statements 250 Nominators' Statements Claes Caldenby (Goteborg) Neve Fuchs-Mikacs (Oslo) Otto Kapfinger (Vienna) Robert Maxwell (London) Akos Moravanszky (Zurich) Marja-Riitta Norri (Helsinki) Vladimir Slapeta (Prague) Voting Summary 256 Biographical Notes 262 Index 308.
Recommended publications
  • Culture at a First Glance Is Published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
    ... Contents Section 1 Introduction 7 Section 2 General Outline 9 2.1 Geography and language 9 2.2 Population and demographics 9 2.3 The role of the city 11 2.4 Organisation of government 13 2.5 Politics and society 14 2.6 Economic and social trends 15 Section 3 Cultural Policy 19 3.1 Historical perspective 19 3.2 Division of roles in tiers of government in funding of culture 20 3.3 Government spending on culture 21 3.3.1 Central government’s culture budget for 2013-2016 21 3.3.2 Municipal spending on culture 22 3.3.3 Impact of cuts on funded institutions 25 3.4 Cultural amenities: spread 26 3.5 Priority areas for the Dutch government 29 3.5.1 Cultural education and participation in cultural life 29 3.5.2 Talent development 30 3.5.3 The creative industries 30 3.5.4 Digitisation 31 3.5.5 Entrepreneurship 31 3.5.6 Internationalisation, regionalisation and urbanisation 32 3.6 Funding system 33 3.7 The national cultural funds 34 3.8 Cultural heritage 35 3.9 Media policy 38 Section 4 Trends in the culture sector 41 4.1 Financial trends 41 4.2 Trends in offering and visits 2009-2014 44 4.2.1 Size of the culture sector 44 4.2.2 Matthew effects? 45 4.3 Cultural reach 45 4.3.1 More frequent visits to popular performances 47 4.3.2 Reach of the visual arts 47 4.3.3 Interest in Dutch arts abroad 51 4.3.4 Cultural tourism 53 4.3.5 Culture via the media and internet 54 4.4 Arts and heritage practice 57 4.5 Cultural education 59 5 1 Introduction Culture at a first Glance is published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernist Heritage Conservation: an Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice
    Modernist Heritage Conservation: An Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice Gaia Ileana Carla ZAMBURLINI School of the Built Environment College of Science and Technology University of Salford - UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, April 2016 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................ IX ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... X ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………………………................XIII PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... XIV RATIONALE .................................................................................................................... XIV METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. XVI AIM ............................................................................................................................... XXII OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. XXII RESEARCH
    [Show full text]
  • Zał. 5. P. Winskowski, Summary. Autoreferat
    SUMMARY OF PROFESSIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS AUTOREFERAT W JĘZYKU ANGIELSKIM Załącznik nr 5 do wniosku o przeprowadzenie postępowania habilitacyjnego Piotr Winskowski Summary of Professional Accopmlishments Summary of Professional Accomplishments 1. First name and Surname Piotr Winskowski 2. Diplomas, certificates and academic degrees possessed – with application of names, places and years they were issued as well as title of doctoral dissertation 1. Master of Engineering (M.Sc. Eng.), graduated with distinction from the Faculty of Architecture of the Cracow University of Technology on December 11, 1992, based on the defence of the following thesis: A Student services centre and small theatre in Krakow. Advisor Prof. Witold Korski Eng. Arch. Diploma no. 3119/A. 2. PhD in technical sciences, academic degree conferred by resolution of the Council of the Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology on 1 July 1998 based on the defence of the following PhD dissertation: Technical inspirations in formal solutions employed in modern architecture Advisor: Prof. J. Tadeusz Gawłowski. PhD Eng. Arch. Diploma no. 1205. 3. Diploma awarded on completion of training course for academic teachers at the Centre for Pedagogy and Psychology, Cracow University of Technology, 1999. 3. Information regarding employment history in scientific/artistic institutions and organisations 1. Technical clerk, Independent Chair of Industrial Architecture Design, Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology, 21.01.1993‒30.11.1995. 2. Teaching-research
    [Show full text]
  • Must-Sees and Icons of the City 2018
    Cover: Markthal, Iris van den Broek van Markthal, Iris Cover: Must-sees and icons of the city 2018 Claire Droppert 1 Rotterdam Centraal Rotterdam Central Station (Team CS, 2014) is one of the most iconic architectural sites MUST DO! in Rotterdam. The roof over the tracks is Need time to take covered in solar panels and the striking hall in this architectural roof points towards the city centre. A number masterpiece? Relax of historic elements from the former station with a cup of coffee building (1957) by Sybold van Ravesteyn next door at Engels have been re-used, like the original clock restaurant, or take in the front façade and the letters spelling the lift in the Groot out ‘Centraal Station’. In the main hall you Handelsgebouw to the 7th floor for a can find several shops, information about beautiful view of public transport and the Rotterdam Tourist Rotterdam Central Information. If you’re looking for original Station. souvenirs, don’t miss shopping at ‘Love Rotterdam. Gifts, Food & More.’ 2 Markthal You’ll find an indoor market hall in various world-class cities, but the combination with luxury housing makes Rotterdam’s Market Hall (MVRDV & INBO, 2014) the first of its kind. The apartments are arched over the DID YOU KNOW? food market in a horseshoe configuration. One of the country’s The main hall houses the market itself, as biggest outdoor well as shops, various restaurants and a four- markets is held on storey car park situated below. Look up to the large square enjoy the massive artwork sprawled across (Binnenrotte) in front of the Markthal the ceiling: the ‘Horn of Plenty’.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Architecture and Modern Furniture
    Modern Architecture and Modern Furniture 14 docomomo 46 — 2012/1 docomomo46.indd 14 25/07/12 11:13 odern architecture and Modern furniture originated almost during the same period of time. Modern architects needed furniture compatible with their architecture and because Mit was not available on the market, architects had to design it themselves. This does not only apply for the period between 1920 and 1940, as other ambitious architectures had tried be- fore to present their buildings as a unit both on the inside and on the outside. For example one can think of projects by Berlage, Gaudí, Mackintosh or Horta or the architectures of Czech Cubism and the Amsterdam School. This phenomenon originated in the 19th century and the furniture designs were usually developed for the architect’s own building designs and later offered to the broader consumer market, sometimes through specialized companies. This is the reason for which an agree- ment between the architect and the commissioner was needed, something which was not always taken for granted. By Otakar M á c ˆe l he museum of Czech Cubism has its headquarters designed to fit in the interior, but a previous epitome of De in the Villa Bauer in Liboˇrice, a building designed Stijl principles that culminated in the Schröderhuis. Tby the leading Cubist architect Jiˆrí Gocˆár between The chair was there before the architecture, which 1912 and 1914. In this period Gocˆár also designed Cub- was not so surprising because Rietveld was an interior ist furniture. Currently the museum exhibits the furniture designer. The same can be said about the “father” of from this period, which is not actually from the Villa Bauer Modern functional design, Marcel Breuer.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM
    Patrimoine Mondial 23 COM Distribution limitée WHC-99/CONF.209/10 Paris, le 5 octobre 1999 Original : anglais / français ORGANISATION DES NATIONS UNIES POUR L'EDUCATION, LA SCIENCE ET LA CULTURE CONVENTION CONCERNANT LA PROTECTION DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL, CULTUREL ET NATUREL COMITE DU PATRIMOINE MONDIAL Vingt-troisième session Marrakech, Maroc 29 novembre – 4 décembre 1999 Point 8 de l’ordre du jour provisoire : Informations sur les listes indicatives et examen de propositions d’inscription de biens culturels et naturels sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial en péril et la Liste du patrimoine mondial RESUME 1. A sa dix-septième session à Carthagène, en décembre 1993, le Comité a exprimé sa préoccupation quant au petit nombre de listes indicatives qui répondaient aux exigences stipulées aux paragraphes 7 et 8 des Orientations, et il a confirmé l'importance de ces listes pour la planification, l'analyse comparative des propositions d'inscription et la réalisation des études globales et thématiques. Ces listes constituent en outre un inventaire des biens situés sur le territoire de chaque Etat partie que ce dernier considère comme susceptibles d'être inscrits sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial. Le Comité a également confirmé que les listes indicatives sont obligatoires pour les biens culturels pour lesquels les Etats parties ont l'intention de soumettre des propositions d'inscription sur la Liste du patrimoine mondial dans les cinq à dix prochaines années. 2. En conséquence, le Comité a invité les Etats parties qui ne l'avaient pas encore fait, à soumettre leurs listes indicatives conformément aux Orientations, étant entendu qu’ "une assistance préparatoire sera fournie si nécessaire et à la demande de l'Etat partie concerné".
    [Show full text]
  • De Groote Potloot
    De Groote Potloot Oranjeschool, Mercer Island, USA, groep 7 en 8 Thema: Nederlandse Werelderfgoeden. Vol 10. Januari 2018 De Waddenzee Advertentie Door Joris Hutchison Als je bedreigde dieren wilt De Waddenzee is een wereld erfgoed, beschermen, doneer aan het net als de Chinese muur en de toren Wereld Natuur Fonds (WNF) van Pisa. Ze zijn officieel bekend door UNESCO. UNESCO is een onderdeel van de verenigde naties. Het is een De website: groote zee dat twee keer per dag leeg https://www.wnf.nl/ komt te liggen. Daar zijn ongeveer 40,000 zeehonden die leven in de Waddenzee. Word een WNF Ranger. De website: Daar zijn ook veel mosselen. De mosselen zijn eten voor mensen, https://www.wnf.nl/doe- vogels en krabben. In de bodem van mee/jeugdclubs/geef-een- de Waddenzee daar leven kleine wormen, krabben, en meer. Miljoenen wnf-ranger-op.htm trekvogels komen om al die wormen en krabben op te eten. De Waddenzee is een voedselplaats voor vogels en mensen, een huis voor krabben, schelpdieren, zeehonden en meer. Dankje wel voor mijn artikel te lezen! Foto bronnen: https://villanieuwland.nl/omgeving/zeehonden-bekijken-op-het-wad , https://erfgoedstem.nl/eerste -experiment-waddenzee-mosselen-als-wrakbescherming/ Bezoek deze site voor alle Nederlandse dingen in en om Seattle. http://www.dutchseattle.com/ _____________________________________________________________________________ De Groote Potloot, Januari 2018 Pagina 1 De Waddenzee Van Nelle Fabriek Door Anisa Dopps Door Miep Bar Clingan De Waddenzee is uniek in De Van Nelle Fabriek was gebouwd tussen de de wereld. Het is een van jaren 1925-1931. Het was gebouwd aan de rivier de wereld erfgoeden.
    [Show full text]
  • The Permanent Collection of 1925: Oslo Modernism in Paper and Models Mari Lending*
    $UFKLWHFWXUDO Lending, M 2014 The Permanent Collection of 1925: Oslo Modernism in +LVWRULHV Paper and Models. Architectural Histories, 2(1): 3, pp. 1-14, DOI: http://dx.doi. org/10.5334/ah.be RESEARCH ARTICLE The Permanent Collection of 1925: Oslo Modernism in Paper and Models Mari Lending* In 1925, architect Georg Eliassen took the initiative to establish a collection of drawings, photography and scale models in response to an increasing frustration among Norwegian architect of not being able to participate in international architectural exhibitions. The so-called Permanent Collection was founded on a principle of absolute contemporaneity, making de-acquisition as important as acquisition in the management of the collection. Nevertheless, the collection kept increasing. By the mid 1930s it included hundreds of models and innumerable drawings and photos and was seen as nucleus of an entire museum of Norwegian architecture. This ambition failed, and the material that had been so intensively displayed in Kiel, Budapest, Helsinki, Berlin, Prague, and Paris, before making its last appearance at the World’s Fair in New York in 1939, was buried in storage, dispersed, or destroyed. Based on extensive archival research, this article chronicles a forgotten collection, framing it within a modernist culture of collecting and exhibiting architecture. In November and December 2013, Mari Lending and Mari Hvattum salvaged parts of the Permanent Col- lection in the exhibition “Model as Ruin” at Kunstnernes Hus (House of Artists) in Oslo, the venue that hosted the most important display of the collection in 1931. Fig. 1: In 1931, the audience of the grand architecture exhibition at the House of Artists in Oslo was mesmerized by the miniature of the new Kunsthalle.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Nordic Concrete Architecture
    Future Nordic Concrete Architecture Future Nordic Concrete Architecture Introduction Through the 20th century concrete has become the most used building material in the world. The usage of concrete has led to a new architecture which exploits the isotopic properties of concrete to generate new shapes. Despite the considerable amount of concrete used in architecture, the concrete is surprisingly little visible. Often concrete is only used as the material for the load‐bearing structures and afterwards hidden behind other facade‐materials. But concrete has a big unexploited potential in order to create beautiful shapes with spectacular textures on the surface. This potential has been explored through a number of buildings which can be characterized as concrete architecture. In this context concrete architecture is defined as: - Architecture where concrete is used as a dominating and visible material and/or - Architecture where concrete is expressed through the geometry. In the following, a number of projects characterized as Nordic concrete architecture is presented together with a description of the epochs of the history of concrete architecture to which they belong. Nordic Concrete Architecture In Scandinavia, conditions different from the most other places in the world prevail. The Nordic climate causes significant changing weather conditions during the 4 seasons. This results in significant fewer hours with sun. Add to this that the sun stands low in the sky – especially in the winter season. This condition has had great influence on the architecture combined with the cultural development in Scandinavia. The style of building has always been inspired of the neighbours in the south – but always with a local interpretation and the usage of local building materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Generelt Innholdsfortegnelse 1 Rjukan
    Områdevis beskrivelse Generelt Innholdsfortegnelse 1 Rjukan .............................................................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Rjukan – bakgrunn, framvekst og særpreg ............................................................................. 2 1.2 Byformingsidealer omkring 1900 ............................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Company towns og hagebybevegelsen ........................................................................... 3 1.2.2 «Egne-hjem» ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Teoretisk byplanteori – noen begreper ................................................................................... 5 1.4 Arkitektur - Typiske stiltrekk fra perioden 1905 – 1920 .......................................................... 6 1.4.1 Nasjonal byggeskikk ........................................................................................................ 6 1.4.2 Jugendstilen ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.4.3 Nyklassisismen ................................................................................................................. 7 1.4.4 Sveitserstil: 1840 - 1920 .................................................................................................. 8 1.5 Landskaps- og naturmessige forutsetninger på Rjukan:
    [Show full text]
  • The Cases of Ła ´Ncut and Włodawa
    arts Article The Question of Appropriateness. Museums Established in Synagogues in Communist Poland: The Cases of Ła ´ncutand Włodawa Kinga Migalska Prints and Drawings Cabinet, National Museum in Kraków, 3 May Street, 30-062 Kraków, Poland; [email protected] Received: 9 November 2019; Accepted: 12 December 2019; Published: 17 December 2019 Abstract: World War II and the subsequent period of communist rule severely diminished the amount of historic Jewish architecture in Poland. It is estimated that in the mid-1990s there were about 321 synagogues and prayer houses in the country, all in various states of preservation. This article examines two case studies of synagogues that were salvaged by being transformed into Judaica museums. The first of these is the synagogue in Ła´ncutand the second concerns the complex of two synagogues and one prayer house in Włodawa. The article contains an analysis of both examples from the perspective of the following factors: the circumstances under which the institution was established, the place that the history and culture of Jews took in the Museum’s activity, the way that Judaica collections and exhibitions were constructed, the substantive, educational, and research activities that were undertaken, as well as the issue of what place these monuments occupy in the town’s landscape. Keywords: synagogues; Jewish heritage; Judaica 1. Introduction From the second half of the 1980s, a growing interest in the heritage of Polish Jews was noticeable both within the country and abroad. This phenomenon developed in the 1990s, and especially intensified after 2000 (Poland’s accession to the European Union in 2004 was a watershed in this regard).
    [Show full text]
  • S. Anna Tejszerska Usjk* the Exhibition “Village and Small Town
    2021 1(65) DOI: 10.37190/arc210105 s. Anna Tejszerska uSJK* The exhibition “Village and Small Town” and the “Borderland Town” in Biłgoraj. Rescuing memory or falsifying the history of an image of a Polish traditional landscape Introduction constitutes a contemporary composition, referring in a simplified and superficial way to the traditional wooden With the shaping of national styles in the early 20th provincial architecture and urban planning of the region. century, among the various functions and meanings as- It is supplemented with replicas or copies of historical cribed to architecture, especially appreciated was its role public utility buildings and objects of worship, char- in the forming of an identity of a place, a country and a na- acteristic of the ethnic wealth of Eastern Poland. These tion. When in 1915 the Polish Architects’ Club prepared have become tourist attractions. The investment does an Exhibition of Polish Architecture called “The Village not have the value of historical authenticity. The actions and Small Town”, the organisers of the project aimed to taken within it do not fit strictly into the work of saving preserve the forms of traditional Polish construction that material heritage, although the authors’ intention is to were disappearing. They wanted to keep the memory of contribute to the saving of the memory of the past shape the architectural heritage and reveal it to contemporary of Polish landscape. The aim of the article is to present the designers as a source of inspiration and a model for cre- results of a multifaceted analysis and critical evaluation ativity. In a similar vein, during the reconstruction of the of the Biłgoraj complex.
    [Show full text]