DOCSLIB.ORG

World Heritage 31 COM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

World Heritage 31 COM Distribution Limited WHC-07/31.COM/8A Paris, 31 March 2007 Original: English/French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty first Session Christchurch, New Zealand 23 June – 2 July 2007 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8A. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 31 March 2007, in conformity with the Operational Guidelines SUMMARY This document presents a proposal for an amended format and a new procedure for Tentative Listing. It also presents the Tentative Lists of all States Parties submitted in conformity with the Operational Guidelines as of 31 March 2007. The World Heritage Committee is requested to note that all nominations of properties to be examined by the 31st session of the Committee are included in the Tentative Lists of the respective States Parties. • Annex 1 presents the amended Tentative List submission format; • Annex 2 presents a full list of States Parties indicating the date of the most recent Tentative List submission; • Annex 3 presents new Tentative Lists (or additions to Tentative Lists) submitted by States Parties since the last session of the World Heritage Committee; • Annex 4 presents a list of all properties submitted on Tentative Lists received from the States Parties, in alphabetical order. Draft Decisions: 31 COM 8A.1 and 31 COM 8A.2, see points II and IV. I. Proposal for an amended format and a new procedure for Tentative Listing 1. The World Heritage Committee requests each State Party to submit to it an inventory of the cultural and natural properties situated within its territory, which it considers suitable for inscription on the World Heritage List, and which it intends to nominate during the following five to ten years. The purpose of these inventories, also known as Tentative Lists, is to enable the World Heritage Committee to evaluate within the widest possible context the "Outstanding Universal Value" of each property nominated to the List. At its 24th session (Cairns, 2000), the Committee confirmed the importance of these Lists for planning purposes, comparative analyses of nominations and for facilitating the undertaking of the global and thematic studies. It also decided that inclusion in the Tentative List would be mandatory for all properties which the State Party intends to nominate for inscription on the World Heritage List. 2. In considering the use of Tentative Lists as a means for achieving the objectives of the Global Strategy, the Special Expert Meeting on “The Concept of Outstanding Universal Value”, Kazan, Russian Federation, (April 2005), recommended that: • States Parties should each establish a coordination mechanism with an interdisciplinary composition to undertake and oversee effectively the implementation of the World Heritage Convention and the preparation and review of Tentative Lists in particular; • Tentative Lists should be seen as part of the effort of conservation of national heritage; • Properties on Tentative Lists should have national and/or other appropriate recognition; • Compilation of Tentative Lists should involve local communities and indigenous peoples and should include public consultation where appropriate; • The compilation of Tentative Lists should take account of the Global Strategy, comparative studies and the Advisory Bodies gap analysis; • The preparation of Tentative Lists should have due regard to other international conventions and programmes; • In preparation of their Tentative Lists, States Parties should be rigorous in their local evaluation to ensure that expectations of inscription match reality; • The size of a Tentative List should take into account the Cairns-Suzhou decision (Decision 28 COM 13.1) and the 10 years cycle of the Tentative List recommended by the Operational Guidelines (paragraph 65); • The comparative analysis should be developed by regions and themes; • Regional meetings on harmonization of Tentative Lists should identify types of properties for nomination in a given region, and those for possible inclusion as transnational and transboundary properties; • The Advisory Bodies should complete their thematic studies and initiate and facilitate appropriate regional and comparative studies as soon as possible and in a Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 31 March 2007, WHC-07/31.COM/8A, p. 1 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines time scale to allow States Parties to identify categories and themes of heritage that are relevant for completion of all Tentative Lists in 2007 and the revision of existing Tentative Lists; • States Parties with no Tentative Lists should be encouraged to request preparatory International Assistance if necessary for preparing their Tentative List; • The Advisory Bodies, within their available resources, should comment on the Tentative Lists of all States Parties upon request; • The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies should provide a compilation of best practices and publish a number of training manuals; • The World Heritage Centre should prepare a handbook to inform property owners and stakeholders about the process and requirements for inscription on the List of World Heritage, and to clarify expectations concerning the benefits and commitments that may result from being inscribed as a World Heritage property. 3. Furthermore, the World Heritage Committee at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006) requested (Decision 30 COM 9, paragraph 9) the World Heritage Centre, in consultation with the Advisory Bodies to propose a new format for Tentative Listing, while taking into account each State Party's situation, to include a level of information to allow: a) A preliminary evaluation by the Advisory Bodies to guide States Parties in the preparation of their nominations; b) An evaluation of the Global Strategy by the Advisory Bodies to inform States Parties of possible comparative advantages that might be considered in their nominations, based on the categories and criteria for Outstanding Universal Value; c) A preliminary study on the Statements of Outstanding Universal Value in the Tentative Lists in order to assess the entries on those lists against the objectives of the World Heritage Global Strategy. 4. A standard format for Tentative Lists is set out in the Operational Guidelines, Annex 2, including the name of the property, its geographical location, a brief description, and justification of its Outstanding Universal Value composed of three parts: criteria and their justification, statements of authenticity and / or integrity, and comparison with other similar properties. 5. To address the requirements of the World Heritage Committee’s Decision 30 COM 9, paragraph 9, the amended format for Tentative Lists should also contain a brief justification of Outstanding Universal Value. This justification should make clear why the property is considered to merit inscription on the World Heritage List and explain the use of the criteria proposed (see Annex 1 of this document). 6. Moreover, in light of the objectives of the Global Strategy, a new procedure for reviewing the Tentative Lists submissions could be established. To this extent, and when requested by the State Party, the Secretariat could forward to the concerned Advisory Bodies the new Tentative List submissions. The Advisory Bodies would to the extent possible and within the available resources, review and provide comments on these submissions. The comments, together with a list of the corresponding thematic studies, if they exist, would be then included in the letter of acknowledgement from the World Heritage Centre to the State Party. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 31 March 2007, WHC-07/31.COM/8A, p. 2 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines II. Draft Decision Draft Decision: 31 COM 8A.1 The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-07/31.COM/8A, 2. Recalling Decision 30 COM 9, paragraph 9, adopted at its 30th session (Vilnius, 2006), 3. Decides to approve the amended format and the new procedure for Tentative Lists as presented in Annex 1 and in paragraph I.6 of this document. Note: The World Heritage Centre wishes to recall that inclusion of a property on a Tentative List does not guarantee that the property will be inscribed on the World Heritage List. Tentative Lists submitted by States Parties as of 31 March 2007, WHC-07/31.COM/8A, p. 3 in conformity with the Operational Guidelines III. Examination of Tentative Lists 7. According to paragraph 65 of the Operational Guidelines, States Parties shall submit Tentative Lists preferably at least one year prior to the submission of any nomination. States Parties are also encouraged to re-examine and re-submit their Tentative Lists at least every ten years. 8. As of 31 March 2007, of the 183 States Parties which have ratified the Convention, 157 had submitted Tentative Lists in accordance with the requirements specified in the Operational Guidelines, 26 States Parties had not submitted any Tentative List. All the nominations submitted for examination in 2007 (see Document WHC-07/31.COM/8B) are included on the Tentative Lists of the States concerned. 9. In conformity with the Committee Decision 27 COM 8A, paragraph 4, this document presents the Tentative Lists submissions received since the last session of the World Heritage Committee in a separate annex. Since the 30th session of the Committee, 30 States Parties had submitted new Tentative Lists or modified existing Lists. The number of new properties added to the Tentative Lists is 152. These properties are presented in Annex 3 of this document. 10. In conformity with the Committee Decision 7 EXT.COM 4A, properties already inscribed on the World Heritage List were removed from the Tentative Lists of States Parties. 11. In conformity with the Committee Decision 27 COM 8A, paragraph 5, the complete Tentative Lists of all States Parties are accessible to the public at the following web address of the World Heritage Centre: http://whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists.
Recommended publications
  • Candidature UNESCO World Heritage | Rhaetian Railway in the Albula/Bernina Cultural Landscape |

    Candidature UNESCO World Heritage | Rhaetian Railway in the Albula/Bernina Cultural Landscape |

    Thusis St.Moritz 0 1 2 3 4 5 km ) #() &,#() !&,#( ! &, ! GRAUBÜNDEN Thusis (CH) St. Moritz (CH) Tirano (I) ) #( &, ! 2. Description > 2.a Description of Property > 2.a.5 Structures on the Albula and Bernina line 123 Structures on the Albula and Bernina line Larger reception building Medium-size reception building Small reception building Linesman’s hut Shed Workshop Covered turntable Water crane Core zone Core zone with railway and cultural landscape Buffer zone Buffer zone in the near area Buffer zone in the distant area (backdrop) Horizon line Other contents Other stretches of the Rhaetian Railway Sources: Basic map: PK 200’000 swisstopo, Wabern Geo-data: Amt für Raumentwicklung Graubünden Thematic data: Leza Dosch Tirano Design: Süsskind, SGD, Chur Reproduced by permission of swisstopo (BM062220) 124 Candidature UNESCO World Heritage | Rhaetian Railway in the Albula/Bernina Cultural Landscape | www.rhb-unesco.ch 2.a.5 Structures on the Albula and Bernina line The buildings on the Albula and the Bernina railway lines are of special architectural and historic signifi cance as examples of different concepts of traditionalism. The largely stand- ardised buildings along the Albula line were built during the period of the Swiss timber style of architecture. However, during the 1920s the mountain pass area the Bernina line runs through saw the development of an individualised ensemble under the infl uence of Region- alism and Neoclassicism. The buildings on the Albula line block structure was developed, with a goods room The person in charge of the buildings on the Al- with timber plank walls, available in the two op- bula section was an architect called Ludwig; noth- tions ‘goods room to right’ and ‘goods room to left’.
  • From the Jungles of Sumatra and the Beaches of Bali to the Surf Breaks of Lombok, Sumba and Sumbawa, Discover the Best of Indonesia

    From the Jungles of Sumatra and the Beaches of Bali to the Surf Breaks of Lombok, Sumba and Sumbawa, Discover the Best of Indonesia

    INDONESIAThe Insiders' Guide From the jungles of Sumatra and the beaches of Bali to the surf breaks of Lombok, Sumba and Sumbawa, discover the best of Indonesia. Welcome! Whether you’re searching for secluded surf breaks, mountainous terrain and rainforest hikes, or looking for a cultural surprise, you’ve come to the right place. Indonesia has more than 18,000 islands to discover, more than 250 religions (only six of which are recognised), thousands of adventure activities, as well as fantastic food. Skip the luxury, packaged tours and make your own way around Indonesia with our Insider’s tips. & Overview Contents MALAYSIA KALIMANTAN SULAWESI Kalimantan Sumatra & SUMATRA WEST PAPUA Jakarta Komodo JAVA Bali Lombok Flores EAST TIMOR West Papua West Contents Overview 2 West Papua 23 10 Unique Experiences A Nomad's Story 27 in Indonesia 3 Central Indonesia Where to Stay 5 Java and Central Indonesia 31 Getting Around 7 Java 32 & Java Indonesian Food 9 Bali 34 Cultural Etiquette 1 1 Nusa & Gili Islands 36 Sustainable Travel 13 Lombok 38 Safety and Scams 15 Sulawesi 40 Visa and Vaccinations 17 Flores and Komodo 42 Insurance Tips Sumatra and Kalimantan 18 Essential Insurance Tips 44 Sumatra 19 Our Contributors & Other Guides 47 Kalimantan 21 Need an Insurance Quote? 48 Cover image: Stocksy/Marko Milovanović Stocksy/Marko image: Cover 2 Take a jungle trek in 10 Unique Experiences Gunung Leuser National in Indonesia Park, Sumatra Go to page 20 iStock/rosieyoung27 iStock/South_agency & Overview Contents Kalimantan Sumatra & Hike to the top of Mt.
  • Culture at a First Glance Is Published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

    Culture at a First Glance Is Published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science

    ... Contents Section 1 Introduction 7 Section 2 General Outline 9 2.1 Geography and language 9 2.2 Population and demographics 9 2.3 The role of the city 11 2.4 Organisation of government 13 2.5 Politics and society 14 2.6 Economic and social trends 15 Section 3 Cultural Policy 19 3.1 Historical perspective 19 3.2 Division of roles in tiers of government in funding of culture 20 3.3 Government spending on culture 21 3.3.1 Central government’s culture budget for 2013-2016 21 3.3.2 Municipal spending on culture 22 3.3.3 Impact of cuts on funded institutions 25 3.4 Cultural amenities: spread 26 3.5 Priority areas for the Dutch government 29 3.5.1 Cultural education and participation in cultural life 29 3.5.2 Talent development 30 3.5.3 The creative industries 30 3.5.4 Digitisation 31 3.5.5 Entrepreneurship 31 3.5.6 Internationalisation, regionalisation and urbanisation 32 3.6 Funding system 33 3.7 The national cultural funds 34 3.8 Cultural heritage 35 3.9 Media policy 38 Section 4 Trends in the culture sector 41 4.1 Financial trends 41 4.2 Trends in offering and visits 2009-2014 44 4.2.1 Size of the culture sector 44 4.2.2 Matthew effects? 45 4.3 Cultural reach 45 4.3.1 More frequent visits to popular performances 47 4.3.2 Reach of the visual arts 47 4.3.3 Interest in Dutch arts abroad 51 4.3.4 Cultural tourism 53 4.3.5 Culture via the media and internet 54 4.4 Arts and heritage practice 57 4.5 Cultural education 59 5 1 Introduction Culture at a first Glance is published by the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science.
  • UNESCO World Heritage Properties in Switzerland February 2021

    UNESCO World Heritage Properties in Switzerland February 2021

    UNESCO World Heritage properties in Switzerland February 2021 www.whes.ch Welcome Dear journalists, Thank you for taking an interest in Switzerland’s World Heritage proper- ties. Indeed, these natural and cultural assets have plenty to offer: en- chanting cityscapes, unique landscapes, historic legacies and hidden treasures. Much of this heritage was left to us by our ancestors, but nature has also played its part in making the World Heritage properties an endless source of amazement. There are three natural and nine cultur- al assets in total – and as unique as each site is, they all have one thing in common: the universal value that we share with the global community. “World Heritage Experience Switzerland” (WHES) is the umbrella organisation for the tourist network of UNESCO World Heritage properties in Switzerland. We see ourselves as a driving force for a more profound and responsible form of tourism based on respect and appreciation. In this respect we aim to create added value: for visitors in the form of sustainable experiences and for the World Heritage properties in terms of their preservation and appreciation by future generations. The enclosed documentation will offer you the broadest possible insight into the diversity and unique- ness of UNESCO World Heritage. If you have any questions or suggestions, you can contact us at any time. Best regards Kaspar Schürch Managing Director WHES [email protected] Tel. +41 (0)31 544 31 17 More information: www.whes.ch Page 2 Table of contents World Heritage in Switzerland 4 Overview
  • Modernist Heritage Conservation: an Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice

    Modernist Heritage Conservation: an Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice

    Modernist Heritage Conservation: An Evaluation of Theories and Current Practice Gaia Ileana Carla ZAMBURLINI School of the Built Environment College of Science and Technology University of Salford - UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, April 2016 Table of contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................ IX ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................... X ABSTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………………………................XIII PREFACE ....................................................................................................................... XIV RATIONALE .................................................................................................................... XIV METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................. XVI AIM ............................................................................................................................... XXII OBJECTIVES .................................................................................................................. XXII RESEARCH

  • Must-Sees and Icons of the City 2018

    Cover: Markthal, Iris van den Broek van Markthal, Iris Cover: Must-sees and icons of the city 2018 Claire Droppert 1 Rotterdam Centraal Rotterdam Central Station (Team CS, 2014) is one of the most iconic architectural sites MUST DO! in Rotterdam. The roof over the tracks is Need time to take covered in solar panels and the striking hall in this architectural roof points towards the city centre. A number masterpiece? Relax of historic elements from the former station with a cup of coffee building (1957) by Sybold van Ravesteyn next door at Engels have been re-used, like the original clock restaurant, or take in the front façade and the letters spelling the lift in the Groot out ‘Centraal Station’. In the main hall you Handelsgebouw to the 7th floor for a can find several shops, information about beautiful view of public transport and the Rotterdam Tourist Rotterdam Central Information. If you’re looking for original Station. souvenirs, don’t miss shopping at ‘Love Rotterdam. Gifts, Food & More.’ 2 Markthal You’ll find an indoor market hall in various world-class cities, but the combination with luxury housing makes Rotterdam’s Market Hall (MVRDV & INBO, 2014) the first of its kind. The apartments are arched over the DID YOU KNOW? food market in a horseshoe configuration. One of the country’s The main hall houses the market itself, as biggest outdoor well as shops, various restaurants and a four- markets is held on storey car park situated below. Look up to the large square enjoy the massive artwork sprawled across (Binnenrotte) in front of the Markthal the ceiling: the ‘Horn of Plenty’.
  • Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia

    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia

    Report on Biodiversity and Tropical Forests in Indonesia Submitted in accordance with Foreign Assistance Act Sections 118/119 February 20, 2004 Prepared for USAID/Indonesia Jl. Medan Merdeka Selatan No. 3-5 Jakarta 10110 Indonesia Prepared by Steve Rhee, M.E.Sc. Darrell Kitchener, Ph.D. Tim Brown, Ph.D. Reed Merrill, M.Sc. Russ Dilts, Ph.D. Stacey Tighe, Ph.D. Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v List of Figures............................................................................................................................... vii Acronyms....................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary.................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction............................................................................................................................1- 1 2. Legislative and Institutional Structure Affecting Biological Resources...............................2 - 1 2.1 Government of Indonesia................................................................................................2 - 2 2.1.1 Legislative Basis for Protection and Management of Biodiversity and
  • Laporan Statistik Tahun 2015 Sumber Dana : DIPA BA

    Laporan Statistik Tahun 2015 Sumber Dana : DIPA BA

    KEMENTERIAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN KEHUTANAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL KONSERVASI SUMBER DAYA ALAM DAN EKOSISTEM i BALAI TAMAN NASIONAL GUNUNG HALIMUN SALAK Jl. Raya Cipanas Kec. Kabandungan Sukabumi 43368 Jawa Barat Telp/Fax. (0266) 621256/ 621257 email: [email protected]//www.tnhalimunsalak.dephut.go.id SSTTAATTIISSTTIIKK BBAALLAAII TTAAMMAANN NNAASSIIOONNAALL GGUUNNUUNNGG HHAALLIIMMUUNN SSAALLAAKK TTAAHHUUNN 22001155 Kabandungan, Januari 2016 ii LEMBAR PENGESAHAN Nama Kegiatan : Penyusunan Laporan Statistik Tahun 2015 Sumber Dana : DIPA BA. 29 Tahun 2016 Waktu Pelaksanaan : Januari 2016 Untuk selanjutnya dokumen ini berlaku sebagai bukti otentik pelaksanaan kegiatan. Kabandungan, Januari 2016 Dinilai Oleh: Disusun Oleh: Kepala Sub Bagian tata Usaha, Pelaksana Kegiatan, Ir. Agus Bambang Haryono Wardi Septiana, S.Hut. NIP. 19610816 199303 1 001 NIP. 19790929 199903 1 002 Disahkan Oleh: Kepala Balai, Ir. Tri Siswo Rahardjo, M.Si. NIP. 19600512 198603 1 009 iii KATA PENGANTAR Pada zaman Romawi, kata “statistik” diartikan sebagai informasi-informasi yang dibutuhkan oleh negara dan berguna bagi negara. Lambat laun, kemudian “statistik” diartikan sebagai sebuah data kuantitatif baik yang sudah tersusun dalam bentuk tabel atau belum tersusun. Kemudian “statistik” dikenal sebagai kumpulan data yang berisikan angka-angka. Buku Statistik Balai Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak (BTNGHS) ini merupakan penerbitan lanjutan dari buku statistik BTNGHS tahun-tahun sebelumnya dan dimaksudkan sebagai upaya memenuhi kebutuhan data dan informasi pada tahun
  • ANSWERED ON:23.08.2007 HISTORICAL PLACES in up Verma Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh

    ANSWERED ON:23.08.2007 HISTORICAL PLACES in up Verma Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh

    GOVERNMENT OF INDIA CULTURE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO:1586 ANSWERED ON:23.08.2007 HISTORICAL PLACES IN UP Verma Shri Bhanu Pratap Singh Will the Minister of CULTURE be pleased to state: (a) the details of Centrally protected monuments in Uttar Pradesh (UP) at present; (b) the agency responsible for the maintenance of these places; (c) the amount spent on the maintenance of these monuments during the last three years; and (d) the details of revenue earned from these monuments during each of the last three years? Answer MINISTER FOR TOURISM AND CULTURE (SHRIMATI AMBIKA SONI) (a)&(b) There are 742 monuments/sites declared as of national importance in the Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) as per list at Annexure. Archaeological Survey of India looks after their proper upkeep, maintenance, conservation and preservation. (c) The expenditure incurred on conservation, preservation, maintenance and environmental development of these centrally protected monuments during the last three years is as under: Rupees in Lakhs Year Total 2004-05 1392.48 2005-06 331.14 2006-07 1300.36 (d) The details of revenue earned from these monuments during the last three years are as under: Rupees in Lakhs Year Total 2004-05 2526.33 2005-06 2619.92 2006-07 2956.46 ANNEXURE ANNEXURE REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART (a)&(b) OF THE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTIO NO.1586 FOR 23.8.2007 LIST OF CENTRALLY PROTECTED MONUMENTS IN UTTAR PRADESH Agra Circle Name of monument/site Locality District 1. Agra Fort Including Akbari Mahal Agra Agra Anguri Bagh Baoli of the Diwan-i-Am Quadrangle.
  • A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind

    A Symbol of Global Protec- 7 1 5 4 5 10 10 17 5 4 8 4 7 1 1213 6 JAPAN 3 14 1 6 16 CHINA 33 2 6 18 AF Tion for the Heritage of All Humankind

    4 T rom the vast plains of the Serengeti to historic cities such T 7 ICELAND as Vienna, Lima and Kyoto; from the prehistoric rock art 1 5 on the Iberian Peninsula to the Statue of Liberty; from the 2 8 Kasbah of Algiers to the Imperial Palace in Beijing — all 5 2 of these places, as varied as they are, have one thing in common. FINLAND O 3 All are World Heritage sites of outstanding cultural or natural 3 T 15 6 SWEDEN 13 4 value to humanity and are worthy of protection for future 1 5 1 1 14 T 24 NORWAY 11 2 20 generations to know and enjoy. 2 RUSSIAN 23 NIO M O UN IM D 1 R I 3 4 T A FEDERATION A L T • P 7 • W L 1 O 17 A 2 I 5 ESTONIA 6 R D L D N 7 O 7 H E M R 4 I E 3 T IN AG O 18 E • IM 8 PATR Key LATVIA 6 United Nations World 1 Cultural property The designations employed and the presentation 1 T Educational, Scientific and Heritage of material on this map do not imply the expres- 12 Cultural Organization Convention 1 Natural property 28 T sion of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 14 10 1 1 22 DENMARK 9 LITHUANIA Mixed property (cultural and natural) 7 3 N UNESCO and National Geographic Society con- G 1 A UNITED 2 2 Transnational property cerning the legal status of any country, territory, 2 6 5 1 30 X BELARUS 1 city or area or of its authorities, or concerning 1 Property currently inscribed on the KINGDOM 4 1 the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
  • Alpine Sites and the UNESCO World Heritage Background Study

    Alpine Sites and the UNESCO World Heritage Background Study

    Alpine Convention WG UNESCO World Heritage Background study Alpine Sites and the UNESCO World Heritage Background Study 15 August 2014 Alpine Convention WG UNESCO World Heritage Background study Executive Summary The UNESCO World Heritage Committee encouraged the States Parties to harmonize their Tentative Lists of potential World Heritage Sites at the regional and thematic level. Consequently, the UNESCO World Heritage Working Group of the Alpine Convention was mandated by the Ministers to contribute to the harmo- nization of the National Tentative Lists with the objective to increase the potential of success for Alpine sites and to improve the representation of the Alps on the World Heritage List. This Working Group mainly focuses on transboundary and serial transnational sites and represents an example of fruitful collaboration between two international conventions. This background study aims at collecting and updating the existing analyses on the feasibility of poten- tial transboundary and serial transnational nominations. Its main findings can be summarized in the following manner: - Optimal forum. The Alpine Convention is the optimal forum to support the harmonisation of the Tentative Lists and subsequently to facilitate Alpine nominations to the World Heritage List. - Well documented. The Alpine Heritage is well documented throughout existing contributions in particular from UNESCO, UNEP/WCMC, IUCN, ICOMOS, ALPARC and EURAC. The contents of these materials are synthesized, updated and presented in the present study. - Official sources. Only official sources, made publicly available by the UNESCO World Heritage Cen- tre, were used in this study. The Tentative Lists are not always completely updated or comparable and some entries await to be completed or revised.
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54

    Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54

    STATE OF NEVADA ·DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City / Photograph by Lawrence Radiation Laboratory· Sedan Crater was formed in the dry a ll uv ium of Yucca Flat by on underground atomic detonation. WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 54 REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUNTIES, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior 1970 WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE: SEJUES REPORT 54 ·. REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS·IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUN'riE:S, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush PreparBd cooperatively by the Geological Survey, u.s. Department of the Interior 1971 -\ FOREWORD The progr~m of reconnaissance water-resources studies was authorized by the 1960 Legislature to be carried on by Division of Water Resources of the Departc.ment of· Conservation and Natural Resources in cooperation with the u.s. Geological Survey. This report is the 54th in the series to be prepared by the staff of the Nevada District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey. These 54 reports describe the hydrology of 185 valleys. The reconnaissance surveys make available pertinent information of great and immediate value to many State and Federal agencies, the State cooperating agency, and the public. As development takes place in any area, ,]c,,mands for more detailed information will arise, and studies to supply such information will be undertaken. In the meantime, these reconnaissance studies are timely and adequately In<'eet tlle immediate needs for information on the wate.r resources of the areas covered by the reports.