<<

TurkJBot 26(2002)103-108 ©TÜB‹TAK ResearchArticle TheClassificationoftheSalvia L.(Labiatae)SpeciesDistributedin WestAnatoliaAccordingtoPhenolicCompounds

MahmureNAK‹BO⁄LU DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofEducation,DokuzEylülUniversity,35150Buca,‹zmir-TURKEY

Received:11.09.2000 Accepted:12.10.2001

Abstract: Thesevenspeciesof Salvia L.growingnaturallyinWestAnatolia( Salvia tomentosa Mill.,Salvia fruticosa Mill.,Salvia smyrnaea Boiss.,Salvia argentea L.,Salvia horminum L.,Salvia verbenaca L.,andSalvia virgata Jacq.)andacultivatedform( Salvia officinalis L.)wereselectedasthestudymaterials.Thephenoliccompoundsextractedfromtheofthespecieswereseparated bytwo-dimensionalthin-layerchromatography.Onthebasisofthedistributionofphenolicspotsinthespecies,thematching coefficientsandthecoefficientofsimilaritywerecalculatedinordertodeterminetherelationshipbetweenthespecies.Asa result ofthegroupanalysisinconsiderationofthosecoefficients,thespecieswerecategorizedintotwogroups.

KeyWords: Salvia,Labiatae,Phenol,Chemotaxonomy,Turkey.

Bat›Anadolu’daYay›l›flGösterenSalvia L.(Labiatae)TürlerininFenolik BilefliklerineGöreS›n›fland›r›lmas›

Özet: Araflt›rmamateryaliolarakBat›Anadolu’dado¤alolarakyetiflenyedi Salvia L.türü( Salvia.tomentosa Mill.,Salviafruticosa Mill.,Salvia smyrnaea Boiss.,Salvia argentea L.,Salvia horminum L.,Salvia verbenaca L.,Salvia virgata Jacq.)vebirkültürformu (Salviaofficinalis L.)seçildi.Türlerinyapraklar›ndanözütlenenfenolikbilefliklerikiyönlüince-tabakakromatografisiyöntemiile ayr›ld›.Türlerdekifenoliklekelerinda¤›l›m›esasal›narak,türleraras›ndakiakrabal›kiliflkileriniortayakoymaküzereuygu nlukve benzerlikkatsay›lar›hesapland›.Bukatsay›lardikkateal›narakyap›lankümeanalizlerisonucundatürlerikikümeyeayr›ld›.

AnahtarSözcükler: Salvia, Labiatae,Fenol,Kemotaksonomi,Türkiye.

Introduction .Nakibo¤lu(1988)classifiedthespeciesofthe Thefamily Labiatae includes200generaand3000 Vicia L.onthebasisofthephenoliccompoundsin species.Sincemostofthemareimportantinmedicaland theirleaves.Haque(1981)statedthatinthespeciesof economicterms,themembersofthefamilyneedtobe thegenus Salvia withhighhybridizationrateitisworth revisedintermsoftheirsystematicpositions.Therefore, studyingthechemicalfeaturesaswellasother somenewrevisionsandstudieshavebeencarriedoutto characteristicssuchasmorphologyandanatomy. elucidatethemorphological,anatomicalandchemical Nakibo¤lu(1992)studiedthemorphologicalproperties charactersofthefamilymembers.AccordingtoMetcalfe ofthe Salvia species.AlstonandTurner(1963) andChalk(1950),thestructureoftheconductive determinedtherelationshipbetweenthehybridspeciesof bundlesinthecross-sectionofthepetiolesofthe thegenus Baptisia Vent.byexaminingthephenolicsin Labiatae membersmaybeusefultaxonomically. theirleaves.Thechemicalsubstancesthatareusedin Nakibo¤luandO¤uz(1990)reportedthatthenumbersof classificationcanberecognizedasalkaloids, conductivebundlesinthecross-sectionedpetiolesofthe phenolics,glucosinolates,terpenoids,oilsandwaxes,and Salvia L.speciesvariedamongthespecies. carbohydrates.Phenoliccompoundsareofgreatusein chemotaxonomicresearch.Thetaxonomicallymost Chemotaxonomicalstudiesdatebacktotheworksof importantphenolicsaretheflavonoids,whichhavea DeCandolle(Hegnauer,1967).Erdtman(1956), relativelycommonnucleuswithagreatvarietyoftypes, studyingthephenolicsfrom Pinus L.species,usedthem andpatternsofside-groupscharacterisetheindividual indeterminingthetaxonomyofthespeciesandshowed compounds.Thereisusuallyaconsiderablediversityof thattheysupportedthedatafromtheconventional

103 TheClassificationoftheSalvia L.(Labiatae)SpeciesDistributedinWestAnatoliaAccordingtoPhenolicCompounds

flavonoidsinanyonespecies;someoftheseare beenmadeaccordingtoDavis(1982).Voucherspecimens widespread,othersveryrare,andthepatternand aredepositedintheHerbariumoftheFacultyofSciences combinationofoccurrenceshaveonmanyoccasions ofEgeUniversity,inIzmir,Turkey(Acronym:EGE). provedvaluableastaxonomicevidenceintheflowering A.ChemicalStudies atalllevelsfromorderdownwards.Thefollowing characteristicsshowthattheyareappropriate 1.ExtractionandThin-LayerChromatography compoundsfortaxonomicstudies:theyvaryfromsimple Youngleavesweredriedatatemperatureof25°C. tocomplextypes,theycanbeisolatedeasilyfromthe Theleaves(0.5g)werecrushedandextractedwith2ml plant,theyarenotaffectedbyenvironmentalconditions methanolcontaining0.3%hydrochloricacid.Thisextract andtheyremainmorestable(Bate-Smith,1962;Mabry wasfilteredandrefrigeratedbeforechromatography etal.,1970). (Nybom,1964;BoseandFröst,1967).Two-dimensional PhenolicsubstanceswereusedbyErdtman(1956), thin-layerchromatographymethodswereemployedin Bate-Smith(1958),AlstonandTurner(1963),Mabryet chemicalstudies.Forthispurpose,preparedplastic al.(1970),Barberanetal.(1988,1990),Thomas- celluloseplates(SigmaCellType100Celluloseon Loranteetal.(1989),Voirinetal.(1994),Nakibo¤lu Polyester,20x20cm)wereusedasanadsorbent.The (1988,1995),andApayd›nandBilgener(2000)tosolve plateswereruninthefirstdirectioninasolventsystem taxonomicalproblems.Theaimofthisresearchwasto consistingofbutanol,aceticacidandwater(BAW3:1:1). showwhetherthereisanycorrelationbetweenthe Thentheywererunintheseconddirectionin15%acetic classicaltaxonomyandchemicaltaxonomy.Ifthereis acidinwater(Harborne,1973). strongcorrelationbetweentheclassicaltaxonomyand 2.DifferentiationofthePhenolicSpots thinlayerchromatographicevidence,thisquestioncanbe Inordertodistinguishphenolicspotsinthe consideredtobeansweredpositively. chromatographyfromtheotherspots,thepolaritiesof theactivatedbenzeneringandoftheOHgroupboundto MaterialsandMethods thearomaticringwereconsideredandtheabilityofthis benzeneringtoreactwithvariousreagentstoformthe Thesevenspeciesof Salvia growinginWestAnatolia differentiatingcoloursandthequalityofthisringto andacultivatedformwereselectedasthestudymaterials absorbinultravioletspectrumareawereused, (Table1).Taxonomicaldescriptionofthespecieshas respectively(Harborne,1975).Thespotswerenot

Table1. Thelocalitiesofplantspecies.

PlantSpecies LocalityandCollector HerbariumNo

Salviafruticosa Mill. B2‹zmir:Ödemifl,Bozdag,1250m,Nakibo¤lu1988 EGE31941

Salviatomentosa Mill. B1‹zmir:Kemalpafla,MountMahmut750m,Nakibo¤lu,1987. EGE31949

Salviasmyrneae Boiss. B1‹zmir:Kemalpafla,topofMountNif,1350m,Nakibo¤lu,1987. EGE31945

Salviahorminum L. B1‹zmir:Gaziemir,rockyplace,250m,Nakibo¤lu,1987. EGE31948

SalviavirgataJacq. B1‹zmir:Kemalpafla,roadside,275m,Nakibo¤lu,1988. EGE31942

Salviaverbenaca L. B1‹zmir:Buca,roadside,25m,Nakibo¤lu,1987. EGE31947

Salviaargentea L. B1‹zmir:MountYamanlar700m,Nakibo¤lu1987. EGE31946

B1‹zmir:Ödemifl,Bozdag,K›l›çplateau,1100m,Nakibo¤lu,1989. EGE31943

SalviaofficinalisL. Cultivatedform

104 M.NAK‹BO⁄LU

identifiedchemically;butevenwithoutthisinformation, Results thespotsthemselveshavevalueasspecificcharactersin Atotalof24spotswereobtainedinthespecies.The systematicclassification(HarneyandGrant,1964). spotsonthechromatogrambelongingtoeachspecies Thefourchromatogramswerepreparedforeach weretransferredtotracingpaperwithoutundergoing speciessampleinordertoseparatethespotsinthe anychanges.Thespotsarenumberedfrom1to24and chromatograms.Thefirstwasexaminedunderultraviolet thecoloursshownasBF=Brightfluorescent,PF=Pale light(256-236nm)andNH3 vapourandobservablespots flourescent,BV=Blueviolet,P=Pink,PB=Paleblue.A wereoutlinedwithapencil.FeCl 3 withK 3Fe(CN) 6 “masterkey”combiningmostofthespotsispresentedin mixture(1:1)andNa 2CO3 andAlCl3 solutionswereused Figure1.All24spotsandtheirdistributioninthespecies asreagents(Mabryetal.,1970).Spotswereseparated arelistedinTable2.Inthistable,thepresenceofthe withrespecttoRfvaluesandspotcolours.TheRfvalues spotsinthespeciesisrepresentedby(•)andtheabsence ofspotsestablishedunderultravioletlightwerecounted ofthespotby(o)marks. andthespotsthatgavethesamecolourreactiontothe Thepresenceorabsenceofspotnumberswasusedin reagentsasspecificRfvaluesweremarkedwiththesame thecalculationofthematchingcoefficient(Cm)and number,andthespotsthatgavedifferentcolour reactionsweremarkedwithdifferentnumbers.The coefficientofsimilarity(Cs).Thematchingcoefficientand numberofspotsinthechromatogramsandtheircolours coefficientofsimilarityvaluesareshowninTable3. obtainedunderultravioletlightweremarkedwiththe Thedendrogramsofthespeciesweredrawnandthe relatednumbersandthecoloursignsrespectivelyon degreesoftheirrelativityestablishedaccordingtothe everyspot.Thespotsonthechromatogrambelongingto coefficientofsimilarityandmatchingcoefficientvalues eachspeciesweretransferredtotracingpaperwithout (Figure2). undergoinganychange.Allthespotsoccurringinthe Thesystematicpositionofthe Salvia specieswas materialweregivenconsecutivenumbers,anda“master studiedchemotaxonomicallyaccordingtothepresenceor key”containingmostofthespotsfoundintheeight absenceofthephenolicspots,whichwererearrangedon collectionswasconstructed. thebasischemicalfindingsasaresultofthenumerical B)NumericalAnalyses analyses.Theplantspecimensbelongingtothesame Thetotalnumberofspotsandtheirdistributioninthe speciesformedthesamespotsalthoughtheywere speciesareshowninTable2.Consideringthedistribution collectedfromdifferentareas.Forexample S.argentea ofthespotsinthespecies,thecoefficientofsimilarity specimenscollectedfromdifferentplacesdidnotshowa (Cs)andthematchingcoefficient(Cm)werecalculated clearchemicalvariation(Table1).Thespecieswere withthefollowingformulas: categorizedintotwogroups.Thesegroupsareshownas Cs=p/(p+d) follows: Cm=(p+n)/N GroupA. S.fruticosa Mill, S.tomentosa Mill, S. smyrnaea Boiss., S.officinalis L.GroupB.S.argentea L., Cs:Thecoefficientofsimilarity S.horminum L.,S.verbenaca L.,S.virgata Jacq. Cm:Thematchingcoefficient p:Thenumberofcommonspotsinbothspecies Discussion d:Thenumberofspotspresentonlyinonespecies The Salvia speciesinTurkeyhavebeendivided n:Thenumberofspotsabsentinthetwocompared taxonomicallyintothreegroupsaccordingtostamen species type:A,BandC(Davis,1982).Inthisresearch,theplant N:Totalnumbersofspotsconsideredinthesespecies specimenswerecategorizedintotheAandBgroups accordingtotheirphenolicsubstances.Thesegroupsare Usingthecoefficientofsimilarityandthematching thesameasDavis’classification. coefficientobtainedintheseformulas,thedendrograms ofthespeciesweredrawnandthedegreesoftheir Tenspots(nos.1,2,3,4,5,8,10,11,12,13)are relativityestablished(SokalandSneath,1963; foundonthechromatogramsfromS.fruticosa (Table2). Runemark,1968). NineoftheseareobservedincommonwithS.officinalis.

105 TheClassificationoftheSalvia L.(Labiatae)SpeciesDistributedinWestAnatoliaAccordingtoPhenolicCompounds

Figure1. The“masterkey”ofthephenolic compoundsinthespecies. BF=Brightfluorescent,PF=Pale 20 fluorescent,BV=Blue-violet,P=Pink, PF PB=Paleblue BF 1 PF PF 2 14 PF PF PB 10 15 12 PF PF P9 11 9 PF 23 PF BV P 13 BV 6 21 5 8 PF 12 PF PF 22 BV 18 4 PF P PF 19 24 17 BV BV 3 7

1

2

Table2. All24spotsandtheirdistributioninthespecies(F:fruticosa,O:officinalis,T:tomentosa,S:smyrnaea,H:hormi num,A:argentea,Vr: virgata;Ve:verbenaca)

Species/SpotNo F O T S H A Vr Ve

1•••••••• 2••••••o• 3•••ooooo 4••••••oo 5•••o••oo 6o•o••ooo 7o•o•oooo 8••••o•oo 9ooooo•oo 10 • • o o • o o • 11 • • o • o o o o 12 • • o o • o o o 13 • o o • o o o o 14 o o o • • o o o 15 o o o o o o o o 16 o o o o o o o o 17 o o o o o • o o 18 o o o o o • o o 19 o o o o o • o o 20 o o o • o o o o 21 o o o o • o • • 22 o o o o o o • • 23 o o o o • o • • 24 o o o o • o o o

106 M.NAK‹BO⁄LU

Table3. Thecoefficientofsimilarity(A),andthematchingcoefficient(B)values. F:fruticosa,O:officinalis,T:tomentosa,S:smyrnaea,H:horminum,A:argentea,Vr:virgata,Ve:verbenaca.

A B

OT SHAVrVe OT SHAVrVe

F 0.64 0.53 0.42 0.40 0.35 0.07 0.23 F 0.87 0.83 0.66 0.66 0.62 0.54 0.58

O 0.58 0.50 0.42 0.33 0.07 0.21 O 0.79 0.70 0.58 0.58 0.45 0.50

T 0.28 0.38 0.41 0.10 0.16 T 0.54 0.62 0.70 0.58 0.58

S 0.31 0.28 0.07 0.14 S 0.54 0.54 0.50 0.50

H 0.25 0.68 0.41 H 0.50 0.62 0.70

A 0.08 0.15 A 0.54 0.50

Vr 0.66 Vr 0.87

%Cs Sixoftheseareobservedincommonwith S.tomentosa — 10 and S.smyrnaea .AccordingtoDavis,thesespeciesare A — 20 membersofgroupA.Phenolicspots(nos.21,22and23) belongingtoS.virgata andS.verbenacaareseentodiffer — 30 fromthoseofS.tomentosa,S.fruticosa,S.officinalisand — 40 S.smyrnaea .AccordingtoDavis, S.virgata and S. verbenaca speciesaremembersofgroupB.Some — 50 phenolicspots(nos.9,17,18and19)arefoundonlyin — 60 S.argentea.Onephenolicspot(no.20)isobservedonly TFOSAHVeVr inS.smyrnaea. Anotherspot(no.24)isobservedonlyin %Cm S.horminum.Thesespotscanbecharacteristicspotsof B — 10 the S.argentea,S.smyrnaea and S.horminum species

— 20 (Table2).CmandCsvaluesbelongingtothespecies showclearlythedegreesofthesespecies’relativity(Table — 30 3).Forexample,Cm(0.87),Cs(0.66)valueswere — 40 determinedin S.verbenaca and S.virgata ,andCm (0.87),Cs(0.64)valuesin S.fruticosa andS.officinalis. — 50 Agoodagreementbetweenclassicaltaxonomyand — 60 chromatographicaldatawasfoundforthephenolicspots — 70 whenthecoefficientofsimilarity,andthematching

— 80 coefficientvalueswerecorrelatedwithclassical taxonomy. — 90 TFOS A H Ve Vr Inconclusion,chemotaxonomycanbesuggestedasa — 100 usefultoolinthetaxonomyofSalvia species.However,it isnecessarytostudyallthespeciesconsideringalltheir Figure2. Dendrogramsconstructedfromthedifferentcoefficients(A. propertiesinordertoobtainadefinitiveresultinthis Fromthecoefficientofsimilarity,B.Fromthematching coefficient). matter.Wecanaddthatsuchstudiesshouldbe F:fruticosa,O:officinalis,T:tomentosa,S:smyrnaea,H: performedatthepopulationlevelaswell.Inthisstudya horminum,A:argentea,Vr:virgata,Ve:verbenaca. correlationwasapparentinstudiesatpopulationlevel.

107 TheClassificationoftheSalvia L.(Labiatae)SpeciesDistributedinWestAnatoliaAccordingtoPhenolicCompounds

References

AlstonRE&TurnerBL(1963).Naturalhybridizationamongfourspecies HegnauerR(1967).Chemicalcharactersinplanttaxonomy.Some ofBabtisiaVent.(Leguminosae). AmJBot 50:159-173. possibilitiesandlimitations.PureAppChem 14:174-187. Apayd›nZ&BilgenerM(2000).Thephenolicchemistryof Lappula MabryTJ,ThomasMB,MarkhamKP(1970). TheSystematic squarrosa (Retz.)Dumort., L.barbata (M.Bieb.)Gurkeand L. IdentificationofFlavonoids. Berlin:SpringerVerlag. microcarpa (Ledeb.)species.TurkJBot 24:169-176. MetcalfeCR,ChalkL(1950).AnatomyofDicotyledones.Vol.2.London: BarberanFAT,RejdaliM,HarborneYB&HeywoodVH(1988).External OxfordUniversityPress. andvacuolarflavonoidsfromIberoNorthAfrica Sideritis species.A Nakibo¤luM (1988).Preliminaryexperimentsontheclassificationof chemotaxonomicalapproach.Phytochem 27(1):165-170. five Vicia speciesaccordingtotheirphenoliccompounds. Plant BarberanFAT&WollenweberE(1990).Flavonoidaglyconesfromthe BreedingAbstract 58(12):1153-1154. leafsurfaceofsomeLabiatae species.PlSystEvol 173:109-118. Nakibo¤luM,O¤uzG(1990).Biosystematicinvestigationsonsome Bate-SmithEC(1958).Chromatographyandtaxonomyinthe Rosaceae Salvia L. speciesdistributedin‹zmiranditssurroundings.Journal withspecialreferenceto Potentilla andPrunus.JLinnSoc (Bot) oftheGraduateSchoolofNaturalandAppliedSciences. 1(2):23- 58:39-54. 29. Bate-SmithEC(1962).Thephenolicconstituentsofplantsandtheir Nakibo¤luM(1992).InvestigationsonsomeSalviaL.SpeciesCollected taxonomicsignificance.JLinnSoc(Bot) 58:95-173. FromTurkey.In:RaychaudhuriSP(ed.) RecentAdvancesin Medicinal,AromaticandSpiceCrops. Vol.2.pp.325-344.New BoseS&FröstS(1967).Aninvestigationonthevariationofphenolic Delhi:TodayandTomorrow’sPrintersandPublishers. compoundsin Galeopsis usingthin-layerchromatography.Heredit 58:145-164. Nakibo¤luM(1995).Chemotaxonomicalstudiesonthe Sideritis species ofTurkeyI. S.spylea Boiss., S.perfoliata L.AnadoluJournalof DavisPH(1982). FloraofTurkeyandtheEastAegeanIslands. Vol.7. AegeanAgriculturalResearchInstitute 5(1):118-129. Edinburgh:EdinburghUniversityPress. NybomN(1964).Chromato-stackasimpletechniqueforimprovingthe ErdtmanH(1956).OrganicChemistryandConiferTaxonomyIn: efficiencyofthin-layerchromatography.JournalofChromatog 14: AlexanderT(ed.) PerspectivesinOrganicChemistry, pp.453- 118-120. 494,NewYork:Interscience. RunemarkH(1968).Criticalcommentsontheuseofstatisticalmethods HarneyPM,GrantWF(1964).Achromatographicstudyofthephenolics inchemotaxonomy.BotNat 121:29-43. ofspeciesof Lotus closelyrelatedto L.corniculatus andtheir taxonomicsignificanceAmJBot 51:621-627. SokalRR,Sneath,PHA(1963). PrinciplesofNumericalTaxonomy.San FranciscoandLondon:WHFreeman. HarborneJB(1973). PhytochemicalMethodsAGuidetoModern TechniquesofPlantAnalysis. London:ChapmanandHall. Thomas-LoranteF,FerrerasF,Tomas-BarberanFA,RiveraDandObonC (1989).Verificationof Sideritisincana x Sideritisangustifolia HarborneJB(1975).BiochemicalSystematicofFlavonoids.In:Harborne hybridsflavonoidsanalysis.Phytochem 28(8):2141-2143. JB,MabryTJ,MabryH(eds.) TheFlavonoids ,pp.1056-1095, NewYork&SanFrancisco:AcademicPress. VoirinB,SaunorisA&BayetC(1994).Freeflavonoidaglyconesfrom Menthaxpiperita developmentalchemotaxonomicaland HaqueS(1981).Chromosomenumbersinthegenus Salvia L.LinnProc physiologicalaspects.BiochemSystEcol22(1):95-96. IndianNatSciAcad 47(3):419-426.

108