Landscape Unit Identification Summary: Coastal

NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION LANDSCAPE CATEGORY PAGES C1 Terakihi Point to Rawhiti Point Exposed rocky coastline 1-3 C2 Islands of the Bay of Islands Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 4-6 C3 Rawhiti Point to Tapeka Point Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 7-9 C4 Tapeka Point to Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 10-12 C5 Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 13-15 C6 Waikare Inlet and Kawakawa River Estuarine inlets and harbours 16-18 C7 Waitangi River Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 19-21 C8 Ti Point to Wairoa Bay Exposed rocky coastline 22-24 C9 Wairoa Point to Onewhero Bay Reef lined coast 25-27 C10 Onewhero Bay to Point adjacent Motupapa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 28-30 C11 Moturoa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 31-33 C12 South Coast of Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 34-36 C13 Inner Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 37-39 C14 North Coast Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 40-42 C15 Te Puna Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 43-45 C16 Poraenui Point to Black Rocks Exposed rocky coastline 46-48 C17 Black Rocks to Haimama Pa Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 49-51 C18 Haimama Pa to Whangaroa South Head Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 52-54 C19 Cavalli Island Group Exposed rocky coastline 55-57 C20 Whangaroa Harbour Mouth and Pekapeka Bay Harbour Mouths 58-60 C21 Milford Island and Associated Coves Estuarine inlets and harbours 61-63 C22 Whangaroa Village / Totara North Coastal Villages 64-66 C23 Inner Whangaroa Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 67-69 C24 Stephenson / Mahinepua Island Exposed Rocky Coastline 70-72 C25 Whangaroa North Head to Hihi Beach Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 73-75 C26 Hihi Beach to Puketu Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 76-78 C27 Mangonui Harbour Mouth Harbour mouths 79-81 C28 Inner Mangonui Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 82-84 C29 Mangonui Village Coastline Coastal villages 85-87 C30 Taipa River Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 88-90 C31 Tokerau Beach Expansive exposed beaches 91-93 C32 Karikari Peninsula Rocky Coast Exposed rocky coastline 94-96 C33 Karikari Beach and Puheke Beach Expansive exposed beaches 97-99 C34 East Rangaunu Harbour Mouth Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 100-102 C35 Rangaunu Harbour Coastline Estuarine inlets and harbours 103-105 C36 East Beach Expansive exposed beaches 106-108 C37 Houhora Harbour Coastline Estuarine inlets and harbours 109-111 C38 Perpendicular Point to Paxton Point Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 112-114 C39 Great Exhibition Bay Expansive exposed beaches 115-117 C40 South Parengarenga Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 118-120 C41 North Parengarenga Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 121-123 C42 Ngatehe Point to Tarawamaomao Point Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 124-126 C43 Tarawamaomao Point to Kahokawa Beach Headland Coast dominated by prominent sand hills 127-129 C44 90 Mile Beach Expansive exposed beaches 130-132 C45 Ahipara to Herekino Harbour Mouth Coast dominated by prominent sand hills 133-135 C46 Herekino Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 136-138 C47 Between Herekino and Whangape Harbour Mouths Reef lined coast 139-141 C48 Whangape Harbour Mouth Harbour mouths 142-144 C49 Inner Whangape Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 145-147 C50 Between Hokianga and Whangape Harbours Expansive exposed beaches 148-150 C51 Hokianga Harbour Mouth Harbour mouths 151-153 C52 Inner Hokianga Harbour Estuarine inlets and harbours 154-156 C53 Between Hokianga Harbour Mouth and Maunganui Bluff Reef lined coast 157-159 C54 Waimamaku Inlet – Kaikai Beach Estuarine inlets and harbours 160-162

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C1

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Terakihi Point – Rawhiti Point. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Steep, indented rocky coast. - Broad coves and embayment. - Small caves and runnels along diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - Jagged outcrops and small waterline.  Complexity/ Diversity islands. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Predominant cover of mature - Pockets of remnant and sense of unity? 6 coastal shrub land – dominated pohutukawa – limited distribution by Manuka. only.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7 - Cape Brett lighthouse and  Mystery lighthouse keeper’s cottage. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond WATER BODIES: the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - Bay of Islands.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 7 - Pacific Coast. - Exposed Coast. HERITAGE VALUE

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. the islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 7 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations - Exposed rocky banks convey - Blanketing of indigenous scrub. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association rugged coastal conditions. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 5 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 - Virtual lack of visible built development over most of unit.

1 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Broad enclosure by head lands - Rather dominant and awe - Intimacy of some small bays and points. spring scale of rocky bluffs and and coves. E.g. Outu Bay and banks. Whangamumu Harbour. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the STRUCTURES: particular values found within the individual unit):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Patched of remnant pasture contract dominant shrub land theme.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 7

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

2 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Passengers on scenic ferries. - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Boat passengers cruising the Bay of Islands. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Rawhiti residents. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on Ngatonga Rawhiti Road. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Trampers on Cape Brett and Whangamumu - Small.  Commercial Areas walkways.

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Outstanding natural character and sense of remoteness.

- Piercy islands and Cape Brett regional icons. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

- Potential for landscape management to ameliorate pastoral intrusions, particularly around Elliot and √ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY Taupiri Bays. 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

3 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C2

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Islands of the Bay of Islands. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE Beaches.

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Scattered islands welling from - Steep rocky coastal banks. - Reefed platforms on points. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 sea. - rolling terrain of body of Larger  Complexity/ Diversity - Small coves and bays defined Islands. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of by prominent points. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 - Predominant cover of indigenous scrub.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - Fringe of Pohutukawa. clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7  Mystery - Hikurangi Pa. - Small jetty servicing Otehei Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and Bay. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Paeroa Pa. the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 7 - Bay of Islands. - Exposed Semi-sheltered coast. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 7 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 5 - Predominant sense of - Sense of inter-relatedness of naturalness. islands – part of a system. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- Buildings largely well sited and integrated.

4 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Reasonably intimate and - Exposure of North East face of enclosed. outer islands to open sea.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 7 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √ - Areas of grazing and redundant pasture (largely (extremely low) (v.high) on Urupukapuka Island) contradicts predominant indigenous theme. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - Imposition of built development at Otehei Bay and Roberton Island.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Subtle topographic variations, coves and - Sensitivity of open flanks, ridges, headlands and  Land Uses embayments. most open portions of coastal terrain. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Mature areas of vegetation. - Limited distribution of existing built development. are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - Existing built development at Otehei and - Consistency of vegetation cover and lack of scale  Vegetation Cover & Type Roberton. of most. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

5 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents and visitors to overlooking portions of - Large (some distant views). How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: mainland. Rawhiti, Parekura, Russell, Waitangi etc.  Residential Areas - Tourist ferry cruises. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Recreational Boast passengers. - Moderate/ Large.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Residents, farmers, doc staff on islands. - Small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 5 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Islands an icon of the region.

- Large degree of naturalness of islands. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

- Much of the unit administered by doc. √ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - Significant opportunities for ameliorative management of grazed areas to revert to indigenous vegetation. 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

6 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C3

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Rawhiti Point to Tapeka Point. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE Beaches.

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Very convoluted and indented - Numerous small bays and - Steeper inland terrain that diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 rocky coast. coves. provides distant backdrop to  Complexity/ Diversity - Prominent head lands and - More deeply indented bays e.g. coast. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of ridgelines. Parekura Manawaroa. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 5 - Near continuous fringe of - extensive areas of indigenous Pohutukawa. shrub land.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 - Pa sites – Te Hue - Small marae and chapels. - Small jetties.  Mystery - Kahuwhera. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Taurikura. the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - Koringa

- Paroa RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Tapeka HERITAGE VALUE WATER BODIES:

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Cultural Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 6 - Integrating and predominance RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 of indigenous shrub land. LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- Settlement largely well sited in - Pasture largely confined to flats floor of bays. and lower slopes.

7 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Very enclosed and intimate. - Sense of connection with broader Bay of Islands. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the STRUCTURES: particular values found within the individual unit):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Intrusion of Pine forestry especially Whiorau, - Erosion scarring associated with road and farm Waipiro Bays. tracks. - Quite extensive impact of housing.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually - Existing levels of built development. - varied distribution of ex. Built development. absorb change without significant modification of its character:  Land Uses - Screening by Pohutukawa and mature amenity - Increasingly sensitive terrain of remaining building How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which planting. sites associated with ex. Settlements. are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - Convoluted line of coast and enclosure of - Extreme sensitivity of ‘Intact’ coastal headlands  Vegetation Cover & Type embayment. and flanks. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 3  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

8 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents. - Small/ Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on Rawhiti Road. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Russell residents (Long Bay). - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Recreational coast users. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Tourist ferry passengers. - Moderate.  Commercial Areas - Recreational boast passengers. - Moderate. - Farm and forestry workers. - Small. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 5 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Areas of very high sensitivity within unit. E.g. Points and ridgelines. - High land and sea borne viewing audience during summer months. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings - Large degree of variability within unit. – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability).

SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - Increasing pressure on holiday home settlements such as Parekura Bay could see built development √ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY dominating the natural context of the setting particularly if built development continues to ascend surrounding hillsides. 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

9 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C4

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Tapeka Point to Veronica Channel. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours.

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Deeply indented bays and - Well defined coastal bank. - Extensive intertidal flats of most diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 coves. sheltered bays.  Complexity/ Diversity - Prominent headlands. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Predominant cover of - Mangrove fringe in most - Pockets of Pohutukawa. and sense of unity? 5 indigenous shrub land Manuka. sheltered bays.  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Bay of Islands. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Sheltered coast.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - Predominant enforcement with locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 indigenous shrub land.  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 4 - Most housing reasonably well integrated with landform and/ or RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 vegetation.

10 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Predominantly enclosed and - Outer parts of unit more open introverted. and exposed to inner bay.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Domination of Orongo Bay by oyster farm (and - Scarring of road and track cuttings. buildings).

- Pervasive influence of scattered housing.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing impact of housing and oyster farms. - Varied distribution of built development.  Land Uses - Screening by pines and Pohutukawa. - Consistency of Manuka cover.] How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Topographic integration offered by bays and - Sensitivity of coastal headlands and lip of coastal are highly developed and urbanized? 5 undulating in terrain. bank.  Vegetation Cover & Type

How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

11 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Russell residents. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local side roads. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on Okato to Russell Road. - Large.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - recreational boat passengers. - Moderate.  Commercial Areas - Paihia - Russell ferry. - Moderate. - Oyster farm workers. - Small. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 5 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Land use patterns and development highly variable.

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings - Some portions of unit rate as highly sensitive. – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - Russell township excluded from unit. - Orongo Bay demonstrates cumulative effects of expanding aquaculture facilities. 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

12 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C5

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Veronica Channel. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Steep Coastal banks, bluffs and - Small, shallow embayments. - Small reefs. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 cliffs.  Complexity/ Diversity - Localised headlines. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Strong belt of Pohutukawa and and sense of unity? 4 Manuka.  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and - Moored boats and small jetties. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Veronica channel. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 - Sheltered Coast. - Haumi River. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 - Continuity of coastal vegetation  Cultural Associations and landform. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 3 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- Many visible buildings set RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 amongst dense and continuous vegetation.

13 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite contained and defined - Sense of intimacy on coastline channel. below trees and banks.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Dominance of ridgeline housing in adjacent urban area.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing context of surrounding built development. - Sensitivity of ridgeline and headland spurs.  Land Uses - Strong cover of coastal vegetation. - Continuity of vegetation. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Varied terrain of coastal bank. - Varied distribution of existing built development. are highly developed and urbanized? 4  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 3  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Opua, Okiato, Te Haumi and SW - Moderate/ Large. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: Paihia.  Residential Areas - Travellers on Paihia road. - Large.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Ferry passengers. - Large  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

15 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C6

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Waikare Inlet and Kawakawa River.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets & Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER TOPOGRAPHY: Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness - Highly indented and convoluted - Prominent headlands. - Small Islets. How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, coastline. - Low cliffs and steep coastal diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Steep coastal ridges and banks.  Complexity/ Diversity flanks. - Backdrop unit-hills. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Coastal fringe of pohutukawa. - Contained areas of saltmarsh and sense of unity? 5 - Extensive areas of mangroves. and reedbed.  Legibility - Manuka cover on coastal To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the flanks. clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Small boatsheds and jetties. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Moored boats. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Bay of Islands, Waikare Inlet, - Tributary streams in bays. Kawakawa river. HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5  Cultural Associations - Interlocking ‘Fingers’ of water Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association and land. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 - Houses well sited in bays and amongst mature vegetation. - Pasture separated from water by belt of vegetation.

16 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Openness of main inlet. - Enclosure of side inlets and river course.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Railway causeway along western shore. particular values found within the individual unit): - Oyster farms and associated buildings around mid Waikare. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ - Intrusion of pines amongst predominant indigenous theme. (extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Harvested pine plantation to west. - Pasture of northern shores and innermost channels breaks indigenous theme elsewhere.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Convoluted line of coast. - Very limited distribution of existing built  Land Uses - Enclosure of bays. development. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Screening by vegetation. - Exposure and sensitivity of ridges and headlands. are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4

 Topographic Type & Diversity

Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

17 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Opua residents. - Moderate. (Distant views only) How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Car ferry passengers. - Large. (Distant views only)  Residential Areas - Local residents – Waimaha / Waikare. - Very small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on Russell, Whangaruru / Rawhiti - Moderate. (Glimpses only)  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes Road.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Higher sensitivity of bush-clad upper beaches of inlets.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

18 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C7

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Waitangi River Inlet. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Enclosing basin and river - Backdrop hills of adjacent unit. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 valleys.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 - Extensive areas of mangrove. - Bush backdrop of adjacent unit. - Amenity planting around  Cohesion - Coastal bank cover of Waitangi Golf Course. Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character pohutukawa and Manuka. and sense of unity? 5  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Waitangi River. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Bay of Islands. the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 - Sheltered coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - Continuity of Mangrove fringe. - Open bowl of inlet.  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 - Flowing relationship between - Existing development contained  Cultural Associations pasture and vegetation. in one area of unit (around Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association Haruru). with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

19 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Broad enclosure by head lands - Rather dominant and awe - Intimacy of some small bays and points. spring scale of rocky bluffs and and coves. E.g. Outu Bay and banks. Whangamumu Harbour. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3

- Signs near Haruru. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - Waterside DEV. NR. Haruru.

√ VEGETATION:

(extremely low) (v.high)

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Intrusion of Haruru settlement, esp. Houses located on ridge and spurs.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY

ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing built development around Haruru. - Exposure of more open flanks of coastal bank,  Land Uses - Screening by coastal bank vegetation. ridgelines and spurs. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Undulations and Indentations in Coastal bank - Limited distribution of existing built development. are highly developed and urbanized? 5 vegetation.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 3  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

20 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Paihia North. - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on Paihia waterfront and Haruru Road. - Large.  Residential Areas - Users of Paihia Beach. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Residents of Haruru. - Small/ Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Boat Passengers. - Moderate.  Commercial Areas - Golfers on Waitangi Course. - Moderate. - Walkers on coastal track. - Moderate. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS Vulnerability). - Upper inlets more predominantly “Natural” and less subject to surrounding development.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

21 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C8

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Ti Point to Wairoa Bay. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Indented rocky coastline. - Reefs extending out from - Rocky coastal bank. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 shore. - Hobson Beach in midst of rocky  Complexity/ Diversity setting. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Belt of Pohutukawa around - Background of coastal shrubs. - amenity planting assoc. with and sense of unity? 5 most of unit. Treaty house in adjacent unit.  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and - Treaty house and flagpole in ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 adjoining unit.  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Bay of Islands. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Semi-exposed coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - Combination of rocky shore and locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 coastal vegetation.  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Majority of unit, i.e. to North of Waitangi Hotel, is uninterrupted RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 by built development.

22 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Reasonably intimate at toe of - Semi-distant enclosure by coastal bank. Focus of views out capes and islands. across Wairoa Bay. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5

√

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - See above RE placement of Hotel.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing built development associated with Hotel. - Importance of heritage setting of Treaty House.  Land Uses - Screening by coastal bank vegetation (although - Limited extent of built development to be seen in How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which very consistent where present). association with coast. are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - Lack of topographic screening elements.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Visitors to Waitangi treaty House (inc Annual - Large. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: Televised coverage of Waitangi Day Celebration).  Residential Areas - Hotel Guests. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Paihia Residents. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Russell residents (distant). - Moderate.  Commercial Areas - Boat Passengers. - Moderate. - Travellers on Tao Henare drive. - Moderate. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 - Golfers on Waitangi Course. - Moderate. COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Unit provides foreground to Nationally sig. Treaty House. - Hotel setting less sensitive – 5. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

24 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C9

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Wairoa Point to Onewhero Bay. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Reef Lined Coast. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Coastal flat extends volcanic - Convoluted line of Coast. - Inland containing hills of diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 fringe out to sea. adjacent units.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 - Belt of sedge, rushes etc. along  Cohesion coastal edge. Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 5 - Manuka shrub land on inshore edge of rushes.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 - Stone walls around homestead. - Homestead sited on edge on  Mystery unit. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Small wharf and boatshed. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 4 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 - Bay of Islands. - Semi-exposed coast. HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5  Cultural Associations - Strong pattern of vegetation Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association open pasture and reef lined with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 6 coast. LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 - Pasture on flat extends - Homestead well integrated openness of coast inland. amongst trees and adjacent to Hillside.

25 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Strong sense of openness and - Broad inland containment by focus out to sea. landform.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

planting. √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Screening by vegetation. - Limited distribution of existing development.  Land Uses - Around homestead. - Varied levels of screening by vegetation – How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Existing buildings. exposure of much of coastal flat. are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - Lack of topographic screening.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

26 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Travellers on the Waitangi Haruru Road, - Moderate/ Large. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: especially from the viewing bay.  Residential Areas - Golfers on Waitangi Course. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Visitors to Hobson lookout. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Users of Wairoa Bay. - Small.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

27 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C10

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Onewhero Bay to Point adjacent Motupapa Island. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with Beaches. AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Vividness LANDSCAPE CHARACTER How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, TOPOGRAPHY: diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6  Complexity/ Diversity - Open sweep of Onewhero Bay. - Low coastal banks or cliffs. - Gently rolling terrain running To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - Prominence of Day point. inland. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Cladding of Manuka & and sense of unity? 5 Pohutukawa on Coastal banks &  Legibility running up valleys. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Bay of Islands. - Semi-exposed Coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 - Enframement provided by  Cultural Associations coastal bank and vegetation Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association fringe. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 - Simplicity of dominant pasture with more ‘Natural’ coastal edge.

28 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Rather open & Simple. - Broad scale enclosure by points and offshore islands. - Focus out into bay. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Buildings on Day Point flat. particular values found within the individual unit): - Power lines strung over Kent Passage. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - Landscape inland of Onewhero Bay devoid of vegetation – limited variety or interest.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY

ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Severe pastoral modification inland of Onewhero - Sensitivity of apex of coastal bank.  Land Uses Bay. - Extremely limited distribution of existing built How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Impact buildings and power lines across day development. are highly developed and urbanized? 5 point. - Stack simplicity of much of unit – limited  Vegetation Cover & Type - Minor topographic variation. vegetative screening. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

29 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Boat Passengers passing along coast or up - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: Kerikeri/ Te Puna inlets.  Residential Areas - Residents of Moturoa Island. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Farmers/ Residents of Overlooking areas. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

30 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C11

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Moturoa Island. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE Beaches.

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Elongated Island form. - Small, but prominent - Projecting reefs. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Steep coastal banks & cliffs. headlands. - Associated small rock outcrops  Complexity/ Diversity - Scalloped Bays. and islands. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Strong belt of coastal and sense of unity? 5 vegetation along coastal bank.  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - bay of Islands. - Kerikeri inlet mouth. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Semi-exposed coast. - Kent passage.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER HERITAGE VALUE BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): - Composition of pasture along To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: ‘plateau’ of top bush along edges.  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6  Cultural Associations - Houses restricted to one end of Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association island only. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6

31 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Relatively contained. - Distant enclosure of Purerua peninsula, Papeka Pt, Inner - Exposure of island “plateau’ and headlands. Coast. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- Avenue planting along coastal edge on North side √ of island.

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Housing located along lip of coastal bank, top of clifflines.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

32 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Moturoa Island. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Boat Passengers on Kent passage and Kerikeri - Moderate.  Residential Areas inlet.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - North inlet residents (distant). - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

33 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C12

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: South Coast of Kerikeri Inlet.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets & Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - Combination of low convoluted inlets and steep coastal banks.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - Pockets of Pohutukawa. - Areas of coastal shrub land. Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Dense belts of Mangrove in - Contribution of scattered and sense of unity? 5 most protected area. amenity planting.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Kerikeri inlet. - Hauparua inlet. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Sheltered coast.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - Fringe of vegetation which lines locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 most of the unit.  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Majority of building set back from coastal edge. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

34 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - relatively open. - Enclosure and definition by North inlet ridge.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: - Reduced diversity and interest in western extent (extremely low) (v.high) of unit.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Oyster farms in Hauparua inlet and Pihoe Bay.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing house found distributed along unit - Relatively low density of existing development.  Land Uses (although density low). - Extremely limited opportunity for screening by How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Varied degree of screening by vegetation. terrain. are highly developed and urbanized? 4 - Portions of the unit largely devoid of screening  Vegetation Cover & Type vegetation. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 3

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

35 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents (south inlet). - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Residents of North inlet. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local roads. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Outer beaches of unit more sensitive – 5.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

√ 4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

36 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C13

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Inner Kerikeri Inlet. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets & Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Steep coastal bank or low cliffs. - Winding course of inlet. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - Convoluted and indented coast.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 - Cladding of indigenous trees - Fringe of mangrove along most  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and shrubs. sheltered shores. and sense of unity? 5 - Backdrop of eucalyptus in  Legibility adjacent unit. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 - Stone store, Kemp house. - Wharf alongside stone store. - Moored boats.  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Small jetties along channel. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond WATER BODIES: the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Pickmere channel. - Kerikeri River. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 - Sheltered coast. - Waipapa Stream.

- Oakura River. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Continuity of coastal bank with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 6 vegetation.

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - Housing largely well integrated and set back from apex of coastal bank.

37 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Containment and enclosure of - Lower portion more open and upper part of unit. focused down inlet.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level - Sense of mystery from winding course.

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): STRUCTURES:

- Houses located on apex of coastal bank and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 breaking skyline.

√ - Seawall/ groynes along Skudders Beach. VEGETATION: (extremely low) (v.high) - Weed invasion of coastal bank vegetation.

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Presence of relatively intensive built development along backdrop to much of unit.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

38 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents. - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on main road past stone store. - Large.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local roads. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Visitors to stone store, Kemp house etc. - Large.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Boat passengers on inlet. - Moderate.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Kerikeri basin of high sensitivity in recognition of heritage elements and containment.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

39 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C14

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: North Coast Kerikeri Inlet. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Steep coastal banks, ridges - Lower terrain of western portion - Small Islands. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 and headlands of outer unit. of unit.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 - Near continuous belt of - Mangrove fringe most sheltered  Cohesion indigenous shrub land and area adjacent Aroha Island. Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character Pohutukawa along coastal bank. and sense of unity? 5  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and - Tareha Point Pa site. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Kerikeri inlet. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Sheltered coast. the landscape that is immediately visible? 5

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - Continuity of coastal bank  Endemic Associations vegetation. Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations - Housing found in unit largely Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association quite well integrated amongst with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - vegetation.

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

40 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Relatively contained and intimate.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Doves Bay marina under construction – - Seawalls, ramps etc. around Rangitane. particular values found within the individual unit): particularly scarring of cuts and seawall. - Overhead Services.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - Oyster farm adjacent Aroha Island. VEGETATION: √

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Cumulative impact of housing, although most are comparatively well sited on individual basis.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually - Relatively extensive existing built development. - Areas largely devoid of built dev. E.g. Blacksmiths absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Screening by vegetation. Bay.  Land Uses - Degree of topographic enclosure in embayments - Continuity of dark vegetation tends to display How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which development in relief. are highly developed and urbanized? 4 and valleys. - High sensitivity of ridges and headlands.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 3  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

41 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of North inlet. - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Residents/ Travellers of south inlet. - Small.  Residential Areas - Travellers on Opito Bay Road. - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Higher sensitivity of ridges and headlands.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

√ 4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

42 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C15

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Te Puna Inlet. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Sound-like enclosure of inlet. - Deeply indented side inlets. - Simple, rolling terrain running diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Steep coastal banks. - Small scalloped bays and inland.  Complexity/ Diversity headlands. - Intertidal flats of shallowest To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of parts. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 5 - Indigenous shrub land on - Mangroves and salt marsh - Remnant pockets of coastal banks. found in most sheltered inlets. Pohutukawa – largely in small  Legibility bays. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery - Pukewhau Pa. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Te Tii Marae. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Te Puna inlet. - sense of connection with Bay of - Sheltered coast. Islands beyond. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 2 - Enclosed identity of inlet. - Continuity of coastal bank vegetation associations. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - Unit largely free of built - Settlement confined to Te Tii development. and Contained bays.

43 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Broad enclosure and definition - Containment of small bays. of inlet.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Oyster farm at Te Tii. - Scarring associated with road and track particular values found within the individual unit): construction.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Most elevated of houses comprising Te Tii settlement.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

44 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Te Tii and isolated homesteads. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on Opito Bay road (glimpses only). - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local roads. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Farm workers. - Small.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Bold forms and patterns of landscape.

- Sense of remoteness and naturalness. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

45 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C16

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Poraenui Point to Black Rocks. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Sheer or very steep rocky - Prominent headlands - Caves and runnels along diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 coastal banks. (especially Cape Wiwiki). waterline.  Complexity/ Diversity - Convoluted line of coast. - Craggy rock outcrops and To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of islands. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 - Small pockets indigenous coastal shrubland.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 - Paoeone Pa.  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Pacific Coast. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Exposed Coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - Stark simplicity of landscape.  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 - Lack of visible built  Cultural Associations development. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6

46 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Very open and exposed – focus out to sea.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √ - Stark simplicity of landscape lacks human scale. (extremely low) (v.high) Although this starkness is key characteristic of the landscape. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - ‘Modified’ landscape in that indigenous vegetation - Lack of existing built development.  Land Uses cover has been cleared for pasture. - Stark simplicity of landscape. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Extreme sensitivity of coastal bank and apex. are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 7  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 7

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

47 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Farmers. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Boat Passengers. - Small.  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Dramatic and undeveloped coastal landscape.

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings - Cape Wiwiki and outstanding landscape feature. – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

48 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C17

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Black Rocks to Haimama Pa.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with Beaches. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Steep coastal bank. - Rocky fringe to shore.  Complexity/ Diversity - Sweep of beaches. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - Taronui Lagoon. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Indigenous shrub land along - Dunefield vegetation. - Mangrove and salt marsh and sense of unity? 5 coastal bank. associations along inlets.  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - Pockets of Pohutukawa. clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery - Orongo Pa. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Haimama Pa. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Rangihamama Pa.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 WATER BODIES: - Pacific Coast. - Tapuaetahi creek. HERITAGE VALUE - Exposed coast (Takau Bay). - Takau River.

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Sequence of beaches and rocky portions of coast. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- Houses confined to bays.

49 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Degree of enclosure by - Takou Beach most open and headlands and varied line of exposed. coast. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- Invasion of weed species amongst coastal bank √ vegetation.

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

- Rather fragmented landscape patterns extend inland of coastal units.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - Impact of relatively intensive housing at Taronui - Pine Forest abutting Tahoranui River. Bay especially those on the spur.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing development at Taronui Bay. - Very contained distribution of existing built  Land Uses - Screening by coastal bank vegetation and development. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which pockets of mature pohutukawa and pine. - Sensitivity of coastal banks and headlands. are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - Lower sensitivity of backshore flats associated - Varied distribution of screening vegetation.  Vegetation Cover & Type with bays and inlets. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

50 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Taronui Bay. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Residents of Takou Bay. - Small.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local roads. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on Purerua Road. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Taronui Bay Lagoon an outstanding landscape feature.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

51 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C18

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Haimama Pa to Whangaroa South Head.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with Beaches. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Sections of Steep rocky coast. - Small moderated sized  Complexity/ Diversity - Convoluted alignment. backshore flats associated with beaches. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - Defined Bays and Beaches. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 - Rock outcrops and small  Cohesion Islands (including flat islands) Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 5 VEGETATION:  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - Extensive areas of coastal - Pockets of Pohutukawa. clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and shrubland. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Opounui Pa. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Opipi Pa. the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Pacific Ocean. - Small streams running to shore. - Exposed Coast. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 3 - Belts of coastal vegetation. - Interlocking fingers of sea and land. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - Forestry largely kept back from - Settlement largely well sited immediate coastal landscape. and confined within embayments.

52 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Moderately contained. - Quite enclosed and intimate in most indented bays.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Road cuttings across flanks. - Seawall/ Groyne at Putataua Bay. particular values found within the individual unit): - Overhead services.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - Roads in immediate backshore. VEGETATION:

√ - Some areas of amenity planting e.g. avenues/ (extremely low) (v.high) belts of Norfolk is Pine.

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: - Rather fragmented landscape patterns in more open portions of unit especially vegetation. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- General impact of built development especially when this ascends the coastal bank, e.g. Te Ngare and Putataua Bay. PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing built development (although very - Limited distribution of existing built development. contained).  Land Uses - Sensitivity of coastal headlands, flanks and How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - screening by coastal vegetation. ridges. are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - Variations in terrain, particularly backshore flats - Varied distribution of screening vegetation.  Vegetation Cover & Type and valleys. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

53 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of coastal settlements. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Coastal holiday makers especially at Matauri Bay - Moderate.  Residential Areas and Tauranga Bay.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on local Roads. - Small/ Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Boat Passengers. - Small.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Settlements in Bays rate less highly – 5.

- Extreme sensitivity of ridgelines and coastal points. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

54 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C19

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Cavalli Island Group. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline. . PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Rugged grouping of Islands - Convoluted alignment of - Small bays and beaches. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 and Rocks. shores.  Complexity/ Diversity - Steep-sheer rocky coastal - Prominent ridges and To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of banks. headlands. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 - Extensive areas of indigenous - Pockets of Pohutukawa on  Legibility shrub land on Motukawanui coastal banks. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the Island. clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond WATER BODIES: the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - Pacific Ocean. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Cavalli passage. - Exposed/ Semi-exposed coast. HERITAGE VALUE

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Associations of Islands. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Rugged, isolated character. LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 - Lack of built development, forestry or other intensive landuses.

55 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Relatively exposed and open to - Degree of enclosure in bays surrounding ocean. and valleys.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Areas of remaining pasture contradict more natural patterns of Coastal shrub land especially Motukawaiti Island.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Degree of enclosure and screening in valleys and - Lack of existing built development.  Land Uses backshore areas. - Very limited screening potential by vegetation. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - High extreme sensitivity of majority of islands are highly developed and urbanized? 7 landform.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 7  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

56 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Matauri Bay and nearby coast. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Holiday makers and coastal recreation users. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Island group present strong opportunities for rehabilitation as a bastion of natural coastal habitat and 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY landscape.

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

57 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C20

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Whangaroa Harbour Mouth and Pekapeka

Bay. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Harbour Mouths.

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - Tightly defined harbour mouth. - Dramatic rock formations  Complexity/ Diversity - Steep coastal bluffs. around Pekapeka Bay and outer To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of faces of harbour mouth. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Extensive cover of indigenous - Pockets of Pohutukawa around and sense of unity? 6 scrub. coastal edge.  Legibility - Pockets of most mature bush To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the around innermost Pekapeka clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and Bay. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7  Mystery STRUCTURES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and

‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 7 - Pekapeka Bay. - Small tributary streams. - Whangaroa Harbour. HERITAGE VALUE - Sheltered Coast.

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 7 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Dramatic naturalness of - Continuity of vegetation across with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - landscape unit. unit.

LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 - Houses on waters edge well sited and integrated although intrusive upon natural character.

58 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Strongly defined and contained. - Rather daunting scale of bluffs and rock formation.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 7 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - beaches and jetties although well sited, intrude - Intrusion of Kingfisher Lodge across channel. particular values found within the individual unit): upon natural character of unit.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Pockets of remnant pasture.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing baches around water’s edge. - Limited existing built development.  Land Uses - screening by well developed vegetation cover. - Over-riding sense of naturalness and drama of How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which unit. are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - Continuity of vegetation cover.  Vegetation Cover & Type - Extreme sensitivity of landform. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

59 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Patrons of Kingfisher Lodge. - Small.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small/ Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Outstanding landscape featuring unusual geological features.

√ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

60 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C21

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Milford Island & Associated Coves. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours. . PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Steep coastal banks or low - Backshore flats at inlet head. - Definition of surrounding hills. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 cliffs.  Complexity/ Diversity - Strong ridges and headlands. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Dense cladding of Rohutukawa - Belts of mangrove and salt - Amenity planting around and sense of unity? 5 and Manuka on coastal banks. marsh around inlet head. homestead.  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and - Small jetties associated with ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 homesteads.  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 - Whangaroa Harbour. - Tributary inlets and streams. - Sheltered Coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 3 - Strong pattern of vegetation - Belt of coastal vegetation.  Cultural Associations and pasture. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - Housing well integrated with RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 3 landform and vegetation.

61 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate. - Deeply indented bays. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Intrusion of housing (despite being well integrated).

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

62 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on local roads. - Small.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Milford island more sensitive than balance of unit. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

√ 4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

63 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C22

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Whangaroa Village/ Totara North.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Coastal Villages. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Coastal foothills or backshore - Steep backdrop of adjacent flats. units particularly Ohaku.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - Convoluted line of coast. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Strong fringe of Pohutukawa - Belt of mangrove around most and sense of unity? 5 along coastal bank. sheltered portions of Totara  Legibility - Pockets of indigenous bush. North. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery - Heritage buildings, old seawalls - Settlement wharves and small - Small boatsheds on water’s Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and etc. jetties. edge. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Moored boats. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Whangaroa Harbour. - Sheltered coast. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Matrix of homesteads, bush with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 5 and open pasture.

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 - Focus on harbour. LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - Houses largely associated with - Well balanced blocks of pasture harbour edge and well sited. and bush.

64 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate. - Sense of Human scale – being a “cultural landscape”.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Newer industrial scale buildings adjacent to - Overhead services in coastal area. particular values found within the individual unit): Totara North wharf.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - Pattern of bush and pasture weakens dramatically in western part of Totara North. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - More recent housing tending to creep up coastal - Oyster farm west of Whangaroa village. foothills. - Sawmill on mangroved edges.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Existing levels of built development. - Strong heritage character.  Land Uses - Extensive screening/ Backdrop of vegetation. - Characteristic low density of existing built How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Backshore flats and undulating foothills offer development. are highly developed and urbanized? 3 topographic screening or integration. - Exposure of portions of coastal foothills.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 2

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 3

65 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of villages. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Visitors to villages and travellers on local roads. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small/ Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Fisherman farmers. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - Prevention of excessive built density and further creep of development up foothills central to conserving landscape character of this unit.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

66 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C23

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Inner Whangaroa Harbour.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - Enclosure of surrounding hills - Extensive backshore flats - Varied alignment of coastal of adjacent units. around upper harbour. edge.  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - Winding river courses. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Fringe of mangrove. - Groups of pohutukawa. - Pockets of reed bed and salt and sense of unity? 6 - Coastal bank Manuka shrub marsh.  Legibility land. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 4  Mystery - Small jetties. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond WATER BODIES: the landscape that is immediately visible? 4 Whangaroa Harbour. - Pupuke and Kaeo Rivers.

- Sheltered Coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 - Bold pattern of Mangroves,  Cultural Associations pockets of trees and open Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association pasture. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4 - Houses well sited at toe of coastal banks often amongst mature trees.

67 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite open. - Enclosure around upper river courses. - Sense of distant enclosure by surrounding hills. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- Invasion of weed species into backshore area – √ Wattle, Pampas, Gorse etc.

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

- Degree of barrenness of upper harbour flats. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Flood banks and drainage channels of drained coastal wetlands.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Enclosure and screening by pockets of - Varied distribution of existing development and  Land Uses vegetation. vegetation. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Existing scattered built development. - Exposure and openness of upper backshore flats. are highly developed and urbanized? 4 - Surrounding hills provide a backdrop to  Vegetation Cover & Type development. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

68 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Local residents, including Totara North and - Small/ Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: Whangaroa Village.  Residential Areas - Travellers on State Highway 10. - Large.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Travellers on local roads. - Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Boat passengers. - Small/ Moderate.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 5 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

69 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C24

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Stephenson/ Mahinepua Island.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - Powerful rocky bluffs. - Craggy outcrops.  Complexity/ Diversity VEGETATION: To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character STRUCTURES: and sense of unity? 7  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the WATER BODIES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7 - Pacific Ocean.  Mystery - Whangaroa Bay. Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Exposed Coast. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 7

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - Barren ruggedness of island.  Endemic Associations - Exposure to sea. Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations - Simple grazed use. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6

70 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Very open and exposed.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

STRUCTURES: COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

√ - Barrenness of island – whilst very powerful and evocative, makes it rather “unhuman” and (extremely low) (v.high) forbidding.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

71 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Boat passengers. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Mainland coast users and residents, especially - Small.  Residential Areas those at Taupo Bay (distant view only).  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- An extremely bold and rugged island landscape.

√ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS NUMBER: C25 PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Whangaroa North Head to Hihi Beach. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with Beaches.

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, TOPOGRAPHY: diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - Steep, rocky coast. - Prominent Headlands. - Rocky outcrops and reefs.  Complexity/ Diversity - Convoluted and indented - Well defined ridges. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of alignment of coast. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 - Indented beaches.  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 - Scattered cladding of  Legibility pohutukawa along coastal bank. To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - Extensive blocks of Manuka clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and shrub land. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery STRUCTURES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 7 - Pacific. - Semi-exposed to exposed coast.

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 - Interlocking fingers of sea and  Cultural Associations land. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Housing generally well located RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 in embayments.

73 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Prominently rather intimate and - Sense of exposure on points contained. and coastal ridgelines.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √ - Slightly fragmented mixture of grassland and (extremely low) (v.high) indigenous shrub.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Impact of coastal resort settlements.

- Pine shelterbelts in Taemaro Bay.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Effect of existing built development. - Sensitivity of coastal headlands, ridgelines and  Land Uses - Screening by pockets of mature vegetation flanks. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which (limited). - Limited distribution of existing built development. are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - Enclosure of bays. - Limited extent of vegetation of a scale adequate  Vegetation Cover & Type to screen development. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 3

74 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of coastal settlements. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Recreational coast users. - Small.  Residential Areas - Travellers on local roads. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Small coastal settlement of lower sensitivity – 5.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

75 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C26

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Hihi Beach to Puketu Island.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky Coast Interspersed with Beaches. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Defined coastal bank. - Sweep of beaches. - Rising foothills.  Complexity/ Diversity - Scalloped Bays defined by To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of headlands. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Fringe of pohutukawa. and sense of unity? 5 (broken).  Legibility - Pockets of coastal shrub land To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the (largely Manuka) on most clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and headlands. ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery STRUCTURES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Doubtless Bay.

- Semi-exposed coast. HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations - Headlands reinforced by Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association vegetation. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4 - Settlement confined to bays, headlands largely free of built development.

76 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Degree of containment by - Focus out to sea. headlands and backshore.

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: - Loss of coast edge vegetation from portions of the (extremely low) (v.high) coastal edge.

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Intrusion of houses in coastal landscape.

- Houses ascending hill inshore especially west of Cable Bay.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

77 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Hihi , Coopers Beach, Cable Bay, - Moderate. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: Taipa.  Residential Areas - Travellers on State Highway 10. - Large.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat Passengers. - Small/ Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Recreational Coast Users. - Moderate.  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Undeveloped Headlands and Orangi Bay of high sensitivity.

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - Future expansion of urban settlement up the hills inland of settlements is likely to severely compromise the landscape qualities of the coastline. 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

78 FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C27

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Mangonui Harbour Mouth.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Harbour Mouths. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Continuity of coastal vegetation. with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 7 - Sense of bastion from open sea. LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 - Virtual lack of built development sited within the unit.

79 RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate. - Focus through head to open sea. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - Vegetation patterns slightly broken by pasture especially Osprey Head. PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Background influence of nearby settlements.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT RDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - Screening by most mature vegetation. - Virtual lack of existing built development.  Land Uses - Minor pockets in terrain. - Extreme sensitivity of majority of terrain. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - Consistency of vegetation cover. are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

80 EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Mangonui residents/ Mill Bay side). - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on State Highway 10. - Large.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small/ Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Rangikapiti Pa site an outstanding landscape heritage feature. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

√ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C28 LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Inner Mangonuii Harbour

PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours.

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 4 - Basin like enclosure of - Steep coastal banks and cliffed  Complexity/ Diversity surrounding hills headlands To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 3  Cohesion - Belts of mangrove in upper -pockets of pohutakawa Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character reaches of harbour - extensive blocks of manuka and sense of unity? 5 shrubland alongside Oruaiti  Legibility River To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 3  Mystery . Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 3 - Mangonui Harbour - Oruaiti River - Sheltered coast - Kohumaru Stream RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 4

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 3 - Simplicity of relationship  Cultural Associations between land and harbour Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Vegetation in reasonably RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 3 coherent pattern - Limited impact of built development

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - quite open - semi-distant enclosure of - greater enclosure and intimacy surrounding hills of upper reaches

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 2 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: - Landscape setting almost too simple – limited (extremely low) (v.high) diversity and interest

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- Cuttings and erosion associated with road cuttings..

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - pockets of vegetation offer potential screening - limited distribution of built development  Land Uses - rolling and varied terrain - openness of parts of unit How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - enclosure of upper inlet - simplicity of landscape pattern are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - existing development at Hihi and Mangonui - predominant “naturalness” of upper inlet  Vegetation Cover & Type Village How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 3

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Mangonui residents - moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - visitors to Mangonui - large  Residential Areas - travellers on SH10 - large  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Hihi residents - small  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - travellers on Hihi Road - small  Commercial Areas st (1 three largely distance views)

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- Oruaiti River portion of unit of significant – high sensitivity (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

√ 4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C29

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Mangonui Village Coastline.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Coastal Villages PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - Winding reclaimed bench - Varied line of coast. diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6  Complexity/ Diversity - Steep coastal bank. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - avenue of pohutakawa along -pockets of indigenous shrubland Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character seawall and tree ferns on coastal bank and sense of unity? 5 - groves of mature amenity  Legibility planting To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and STRUCTURES: ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 - heritage buildings  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - old seawalls ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - wharf as focus the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Mangonui Harbour

- sheltered coastline HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association -relationship between harbour, with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 6 road and settlement LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 - coastal bank largely free of buildings around village – provides backdrop to heritage buildings

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate – - sense of security looking out very human scale across the bay

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - intrusion of less sensitive modern buildings found particular values found within the individual unit): within unit

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- invasion of pampas and other weed species on √ cleared portions of coastal bank

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - cuttings stepping up bank adjacent to old courthouse.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - unit already highly modified by human activity - strong heritage character of the unit  Land Uses - variations in line & grade of coastal bank - importance of largely undeveloped coastal bank How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - areas of screening by indigenous and exotic as backdrop to village are highly developed and urbanized? 2 amenity planting - varied distribution of screening vegetation.  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Mangonui residents. - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on SH12 (who don’t use bypass) - Large.  Residential Areas - tourist / holiday maker visitors - large.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - boat passengers - moderate/small  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Travellers on Hihi Road - small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - scale of modification (or mass) of future building in the unit will have particular bearing on the degree of success of integration. 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C30

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Taipa River Inlet

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - winding inlet course - defining coastal banks - backdrop hills of adjacent units  Complexity/ Diversity - barrier spit enclosing entry To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - fringe of mangrove - amenity plantings on spit Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Manuka shrub land and coastal and sense of unity? 5 forest on coastal bank  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Doubtless Bay. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Taipa River

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the -flowing course of inlet echoed locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 by landform and vegetation  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - Virtual lack of built development - pasture separated from sited within the unit. coastline by vegetation RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate. - sense of “opening” and mystery along course of inlet

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - pile moorings - power poles and lines alongside road particular values found within the individual unit): - road bridge and causeway dominate entry and 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 break connection with sea VEGETATION: √ - invasion of weed species into littoral fringe (extremely low) (v.high) vegetation

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- destructive impact of quarry on headland - houses on brink of coastal bank upstream - housing around inlet mouth - roadside cuttings along coastal bank

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually - impact of housing and quarry as existing - varied distribution of screening vegetation absorb change without significant modification of its character:  Land Uses - undulations in coastal bank - built development restricted to lower reaches of How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - weaving alignment of unit river are highly developed and urbanized? 4 - inland backdrop of hills  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 3

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents/visitors to Taipa - moderate/large How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - boat passengers - moderate  Residential Areas - travellers on SH10 - large  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - travellers on Black River and Kohumara Roads - moderate  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - local farmers - small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 6 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - eastern bush clad coast of high sensitivity

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C31

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Tokerau Beach

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Expansive exposed beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - open sweep of beach - relationship with steeper land of Karikari Peninsula and Mt Camel  Complexity/ Diversity - undulations of dunefield To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5  Cohesion - indigenous dunefield plant Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character associations and sense of unity? 6  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Doubtless Bay. - Awapoko River - small dune lakes ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Semi-exposed coast the landscape that is immediately visible? 5

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations - relationship between beach and Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the dunes locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - much of the unit is free of built with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - development

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - expansiveness and openness - sense of very broad - degree of containment amongst of unit focus out to sea containment by steep adjoining dunes terrain To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - influence of inland shelterbelts PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of housing at Tokerau Beach Rd and Tokerau Beach settlement.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - effect of existing built development -limited distribution of existing built development  Land Uses - subtle topographic screening by dunes - virtual lack of screening by vegetation How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - sensitivity of dunefields are highly developed and urbanized? 5  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 7

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents of beachside settlements - Small/moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - beach users - moderate  Residential Areas - residents of Coopers Beach (distant view only) - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - travellers on SH10 (glimpse) - large  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Areas compromised by existing built development of lower overall sensitivity – 4 to 5.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C32

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Karikari Peninsula Rocky Coast

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Exposed Rocky Coastline PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - rocky bluffs and headlands - outcrops of rock and reefs - small sandy beaches amongst rocky promontories  Complexity/ Diversity - convoluted alignment of coast To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5  Cohesion - pockets of pohutakawa – most - belts of native shrubland along Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character prevalent in southern extent of coastal bank and sense of unity? 4 unit  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 - Rangiawhia Pa site  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - pacific coast - Whataru Bay wetland the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - exposed/semi-exposed coast

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - sequence of rocky headlands locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 and bays  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 3 - majority of unit devoid of built - forestry blocks kept inland of development. coastal edge RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - moderately to very open on - degree of enclosure within bays headlands

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - loss of indigenous vegetation along much of coastal edge – erosion / weed invasion √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of forestry on siting of houses in adjacent terrestrial unit and south of unit.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - impact of existing built development - limited distribution of existing development  Land Uses - screening by pohutakawa and native shrubland - portions of coast largely clear of vegetation How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - convoluted line of coast - extreme sensitivity of cliff / bank lip and headlands are highly developed and urbanized? 5  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents (of peninsula) - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - residents / users of Tokerau Beach - Small/ Moderate.  Residential Areas - users of Karikari Beach - Small  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Matai Bay campers - Moderate  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - boat passengers - Small  Commercial Areas NOTE: much of unit very inaccessible other than by boat. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C33

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Karikari Beach & Puheke Beach

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Expansive exposed beaches. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - expansive sweep of beach - defining headlands  Complexity/ Diversity - steep to undulating dunefield - gentle profile of beach To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of extending inland – Mt Pukehe. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - indigenous component of - wetlands / lake fringe plant - backshore manuka association and sense of unity? 6 dunefield vegetation associations in backshore area  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - pohutakawa along portions of clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and dunes ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 WATER BODIES:

- Karikari Bay. - Lake Rotokawau RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Semi-exposed coast - Wairahorahora Stream

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations - flow of beach dunes and dune Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association vegetation with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 - extremely limited visible built development

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - relatively expansive and open - broad enclosure by adjacent - more intimate and contained headlands amongst dunes

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √ - intrusion of pocket of pasture into coastal (extremely low) (v.high) landscape

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- houses and farm buildings located on edge of coastal bank – very minor impact on coastal landscape - impact of tracks through dunes and along coastal bank

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - users of the local beach and surrounding land - Moderate.  Residential Areas (largely related to DOC’s Karikari campground)  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C34

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: East Rangaunu Harbour Mouth.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky coast interspersed with beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Steep coastal bank. - rocky, reef lined portions.  Complexity/ Diversity - scalloped bays defined by - intensely white sand. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of prominent headlands elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - Strong cladding of pohutukawa - pockets of dunefield vegetation - amenity plantings around and sense of unity? 5 – indigenous coastal shrubland Rangiputa  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Rangaunu Bay the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - Rangaunu Harbour

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - Strong belt of coastal locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 vegetation.  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - buildings well sited on coastal flat at toe of coastal bank. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

100

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed and intimate. - views up harbour and out through heads to open sea

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the STRUCTURES: particular values found within the individual unit):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION: - impact of wildling pines and weed species √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impacts of buildings at Rangiputa and motel on Pukehe Road

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 4

101

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Rangiputa - Small.

How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Recreational coast users. - Moderate.  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- undeveloped portions of unit rate more highly – 6 for overall sensitivity (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

102

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C35

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Rangaunu Harbour coastline.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 4 - extensive intertidal flats and - indented channels and varied - definition by hills to the south. banks. coastal edge.  Complexity/ Diversity - white sand of outer harbour. To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - extensive horizontal of harbour. elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - extensive fringe and blocks of - backing of rushbed and - amenity trees and pohutakawa and sense of unity? 4 mangrove saltmarsh / meadow around kaimaumau  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 3  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Rangaunu Harbour. - tributary rivers - tributary creeks and streams the landscape that is immediately visible? 4 - Sheltered Coast.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 4

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - strongly horizontal and open - extensive flats of harbour with locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 3 theme of harbour landscape belts of mangroves  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - very limited impact of built - containment of settlement at development. kaimaumau. RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 3

103

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - very open and expansive - greater sense of containment and intimacy amongst mangrove - difficult to determine scale of harbour and harbour edge. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

mouths into harbour 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ - loss of natural coastal edge vegetation along - invasion of pampas and gorse in backshore eastern and southern coast. saltmarsh areas (extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

- limited level of variety and spatial diversity over much of unit PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - impact of road, fences and houses of kaimaumau

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: -impact of existing built developments and - unit predominantly devoid of built development  Land Uses floodbanks on small parts of unit. - extremely limited distribution of screening How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - potential screening by vegetation in small portions vegetation are highly developed and urbanized? 5 of unit. - lack of topographic screening elements and very  Vegetation Cover & Type limited provision of topographic backdrop. How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

104

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on local roads - small  Residential Areas - Boat passengers. - small  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - residents/visitors to Rangiputa (distant view) - Small/ Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - more natural areas in north of unit justify an overall sensitivity rating of 5 – 6.

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - extensive, horizontal nature of landscape indicates that development with a strong vertical component is likely to generate significant visual impact.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

√ 4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

105

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C36

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: East Beach

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Expansive exposed beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - Expansive sweep of beach - low, undulating dunefields in backshore  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - indigenous dunefield plant Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character associations and sense of unity? 7 STRUCTURES:  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Rangaunu Bay. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Exposed coast. the landscape that is immediately visible? 2

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations -simple expanse of beach and Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the relationship with dunes locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - lack built development – sense with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - of naturalness

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6

106

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - very open and exposed – focus out to sea

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: √

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- minor intrusion of Subritzky camping ground at head of beach

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

107

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - recreational beach users (no road access to - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: beach)  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- the visual identity and geomorphology of East Beach is integrally linked to the Motutangi Swamp that it contains from the open sea. Any modification of either unit will therefore affect the other. 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

108

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C37

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Houhora Harbour Coastline.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - expansive intertidal flats and - importance of Mt Camel as a banks  Complexity/ Diversity “Bastion” at harbour mouth (and To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of attached isthmus) elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - mangrove fringe in upper - pockets of coastal shrubland on - pockets of pohutakawa, pine and sense of unity? 5 reaches shore and amenity planting around  Legibility - embayment of saltmarsh on south east coast of harbour To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the eastern coast of harbour clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 4 STRUCTURES:  Mystery -Tukauri Pa (on edge of unit) - wharf relates well to coast and - moored boats Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and focuses interface between ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond settlement and harbour the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 - Houhora Harbour HERITAGE VALUE - sheltered coast

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - mangrove fringe of upper - contained character of harbour harbour RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

-settlement contained to south -farm forestry in adjacent units east coast well related to scale of landform and harbour

109

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - moderately contained and focused (harbour quite linear)

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - seawall / reclamation at heads particular values found within the individual unit): - new jetty and cuttings to south of old jetty

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- road dominates (small) parts of coast - impact of housing on coast, especially two storeyed.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY

Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: absorb change without significant modification of its character: - existing levels of built development in south east - limited distribution of existing built development  Land Uses segment of unit. - openness and exposure of much of unit How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - screening by vegetation (largest in south east - limited screening vegetation are highly developed and urbanized? 4 area)  Vegetation Cover & Type - limited topographic screening How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

110

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents of Pukenui, Houhora and Te Raupo - Small/ Moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - other local residents - Small.  Residential Areas - travellers on Far North Road (glimpses only) - Moderate  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - travellers on local roads - Small  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - boat passengers - Small.  Commercial Areas - recreational users of coast (eg Pukenui Wharf) - Small/ Moderate. - visitors / campers at Houhora Heads - Small/ Moderate. RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- extreme sensitivity of perpendicular point headland (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

111

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C38

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Perpendicular Point to Paxton Point

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky coast interspersed with beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - area of beaches - dunefields associated with - craggy outcrops of rock in sea beaches  Complexity/ Diversity - prominent rocky outcrops of pts To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - steep coastal banks - reef platforms elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 - Mt Camel as backdrop  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character VEGETATION: and sense of unity? 5  Legibility - native coastal shrubland on - belts & pockets of pohutakawa To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the coastal banks - dunefields vegetation clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and associations ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 -Rangaunu Bay / Great Exhibition Bay - exposed coast. HERITAGE VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - continuity of vegetation along - sequence of rocky headlands - simple, bold landscape pattern coastal bank of much of unit and sweeping beach RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - unit devoid of built development on land

112

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - moderately open and focused - greater sense of containment in out to sea rocky sections of coast

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - rafts of mussel farm buoys in Houhora Bay particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - fragmentation of vegetation along segments of

coastal bank √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of mussel farm.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - convoluted line of much of coast - lack of existing built development (other than  Land Uses - precedence of marine farm mussel farm) How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - very limited vegetation screening are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - extreme sensitivity of headlands, coastal flank  Vegetation Cover & Type and brow of cliff / bank How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

113

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local farmers and mussel farm operator - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - boat passengers - Small.  Residential Areas - Rarawa Beach users and campers - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

114

LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C39

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Great Exhibition Bay. LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Expansive exposed beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, - expansive sweep of beach - termination of bay with Kokota diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - undulating dunefields heading sandspit  Complexity/ Diversity inland To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 5 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - indigenous dunefield plant and sense of unity? 6 associations  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Great Exhibition Bay. - Wairahi Swamp - Lake Te Kahika ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 2 - Exposed coast. - Lake Taeore - Rarawa/Ngataki Streams

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - sweep of beach and associated  Endemic Associations belt of dunes Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations - edge of forestry reasonably Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association responsive to form of dunes and with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - natural vegetation patterns.

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

115

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - extremely open and exposed - sense of more enclosure on beach – focus out to sea. amongst dunes, but still quite open To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of forestry south of parengarenga.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - undulations of dunes - lack of existing built development.  Land Uses - Screening by forestry. - limited distribution of screening vegetation How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - sensitivity of dunes are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

116

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - recreational beach users - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - local residents - Small.  Residential Areas - forestry workers - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- lack of existing built development (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings - sense of remoteness – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability).

SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

117

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C40

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: South Parengarenga Harbour.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 5 - convoluted coastal edge - broad containment of - extensive intertidal flats surrounding rolling low hills  Complexity/ Diversity - relationship with Kokota - sweeping and winding channels To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - pale sand on harbour floor elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - belts of native shrubland along - pockets of saltmarsh and salt and sense of unity? 5 coastal bank. meadow  Legibility - belts and pockets of mangrove To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the in upper reaches clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 4 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - small jetties a “cultural symbol” ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES: - Parengarenga Harbour. - rich colour of water - tributary streams RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 - Sheltered Coast. - pockets of wetland

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations - fringe of coastal vegetation - blocks of mangrove Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - bold, simplicity of inland - housing contained in defined RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4 pastoral landscape settlements (Paua and Te Hapua)

118

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - broadly open and exposed - sense of low, distant enclosure by inland backdrop

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - loss of coastal bank vegetation from portions of pastoral flats √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- incongruity of single rectangular shelterbelt on flats (adjacent unit)

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - landscape of flats clearly intensively used - limited distribution and low profile of existing built  Land Uses - impact of existing housing development How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - convoluted line of coast - limited screening capacity of vegetation are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - very limited topographic screening  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

119

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on local roads - Small.  Residential Areas - travellers on Far North Road (small glimpses only) - Moderate.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - Boat passengers. - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - coastal margins, mangroves and shoals particularly sensitive

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

120

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C41

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: North Parengarenga Harbour.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - extremely indented line of coast - extensive intertidal flats - winding channels  Complexity/ Diversity - prominent headlands and spits - pale sand of harbour bottom - relationship with Kokota and To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of harbour mouth elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - cover of indigenous scrubland - pockets of mangrove in upper and sense of unity? 7 down to water channels  Legibility - areas of reed bed and salt To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the marsh clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Te Pokere Pa ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Parengarenga Pa (just outside the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 unit)

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 WATER BODIES:

- Parengarenga Harbour. - Rich aqua of water - tributary streams HERITAGE VALUE - Sheltered Coast. - pockets of wetland

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6  Cultural Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Continuity of indigenous shrub with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 5 land along coast and into hills

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): - lack of built development (other than a couple of buildings associated with Te Hapua)

121

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - moderately contained overall - strong sense of enclosure in upper inlets

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - a few buildings near Te Hapua particular values found within the individual unit): - track cuttings near Te Hapua

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

122

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Residents of Te Hapua and Paua - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on local roads - Small.  Residential Areas - boat passengers - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- sense of remoteness and virtual lack of visible built development (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

123

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C42

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Ngatehe Pt to Tarawamaomao Pt

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Rocky coasts interspersed with beaches. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER

Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness - steep craggy coastal cliffs - embayments associated with - reefed platforms and rock How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, beaches outcrops diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - prominent headlands - prominent coastal ridgelines - dunefields associated with  Complexity/ Diversity - sweep of beaches beaches To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - near continuous cover of native - scattered pohutakawa along - pockets of wetland vegetation and sense of unity? 5 shrubland coastal beaches in dune backs & contained  Legibility - dunefield vegetation valleys To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the association clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery - Cape Reinga lighthouse a Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and national icon ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES:

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Pacific Ocean / Tasman Sea. - tributary streams & pockets of - Exposed coast. wetland HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6  Cultural Associations - Continuity of vegetation cover Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 4 - Sequence of rocky coast & beaches RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- Virtual lack of built development

- limited extent of “cultural” landscape (eg pasture)

124

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite open and exposed. - dramatic scale of landforms and beaches - Focus out to sea. To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - impact of masts, clutter of buildings and road particular values found within the individual unit): cutting at Cape Reinga

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- loss of coastal vegetation from parts of unit (eg √ adjacent Spirits Bay)

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - existing modification of Cape Reinga - Virtual lack of existing built development within  Land Uses - convoluted line of coast unit. How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - potential screening in valleys - continuity of low vegetation through much of unit are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - minor screening by vegetation - sensitivity of coastal cliffs, cliff apexes and  Vegetation Cover & Type headlands How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

125

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Visitors to Cape Reinga - Moderate/Large. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - DOC campground uses - Small/ Moderate.  Residential Areas - Cape Reinga walkway users - Small  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - travellers on local roads - Small/ Moderate.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - Boat passengers. - Small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - prominence of Cape Reinga as national landmark and tourist destination

- sense of remoteness and wilderness of majority of unit. (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS

- much of unit in conservation estate 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - most of north east portion of unit highly inaccessible √ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

126

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C43

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Tarawamaomao Pt to Kamokawa Beach

Headland PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: coast dominated by prominent sandhills

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - prominent dunes - enclosed inland wetland - combination of craggy rocky coast and “flowing” sand coast  Complexity/ Diversity - headlands and islands of To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of harder material elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 - low peninsulas of sand  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character VEGETATION: and sense of unity? 6 - extensive areas of fresh water - stunted coastal shrubland  Legibility wetland association To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and - natural dunefield associations ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Cape Brett lighthouse a ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond national icon the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Tasman Sea - Werahi stream and wetland

- exposed coast HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Endemic Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations - bold, simple patterns of Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association vegetation and sand with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 - Virtual lack of built development

127

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite open and expansive - semi-distant enclosure by headlands and inland hills

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - masts, sheds, car parking etc associated with particular values found within the individual unit): Cape Brett

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- degradation of coastal area by past development as pasture.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

128

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - visitors to Cape Reinga - Moderate / large. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on local roads - Moderate  Residential Areas - travellers up Te Paki stream. - Moderate  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - walkers on Cape Reinga walkway - Small.  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - naturalness and dynamism of unit - focus of views west from Cape Reinga (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - majority of unit under Doc management 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

129

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C44

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: 90 Mile Beach

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Expansive Exposed Beaches PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - expansive sweep of beach  Complexity/ Diversity - background dunefield To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 4  Cohesion - indigenous dunefield Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character association and sense of unity? 5  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Tasman Sea - backshore dune lakes - Te Paki Stream ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Exposed coast - other small streams the landscape that is immediately visible? 2

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 5 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER HERITAGE VALUE BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):

To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: - “flow” of beach & dunes  Endemic Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 - built development not visible  Cultural Associations from majority of beach Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6

130

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Expansiveness of beach and - enclosure amongst rolling sea forms of dunes.

- sense of “infinity” To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - sheer scale and magnitude of beach somewhat intimidating PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of Ahipara on beach – particularly houses sited on dune apexes

- dominance of Aupouri forest

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY

Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: absorb change without significant modification of its character: - existing levels of built development at Ahipara and - extreme sensitivity of dune apexes  Land Uses Waipapakauri settlements - limited distribution of existing built development How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - undulations of dunes are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - limited screening vegetation associated with dunes  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a - very simple and open form of beach high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

131

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents of Ahipara - moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - residents of Waipapakauri - small  Residential Areas - travellers on 90 mile beach - moderate / large  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - recreational users of beach - moderate  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - farmers and forestry workers - small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 4 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - monocultural influence of adjacent pine forest detracts from naturalness and complexity of unit

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - dune complex an extremely dynamic and sensitive landscape element. Landuse changes in this part of the unit may result in significant effects 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - edge of Aupouri plantation immensely suited to amelioration 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

132

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C45

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Ahipara to Herekino Harbour Mouth

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: coast dominated by prominent sandhills PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - imposing sand dunes mounting - reef lined coast - narrow strip of beach lines some distance inland. shore  Complexity/ Diversity - backdrop of steep terrain To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - pockets of manuka scrubland Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 STRUCTURES:  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - small, gypsy-like shelters along clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and coast have a certain vernacular ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 character  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Tasman sea the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - exposed coast

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - expansive relationship between locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 coast and open sea  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - predominantly “natural” patterns of pasture, scrub and RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 exposed sand

133

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - sense of expansiveness on - small gullies running inland coastline more enclosed and limited

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - small shelters along coast detract from sense of particular values found within the individual unit): isolation (although having a vernacular character)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- pockets of the pine plantation although quite well √ shaped and aligned

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

134

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - Ahipara residents (distant) - moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - residents of temporary shelters - small  Residential Areas - local farmers and land owners - small  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - coast users – fishermen, surfers etc - small  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes

 Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3

COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

(Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability). SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS - underlying composition of sand makes this a vulnerable and mobile changing landscape. Land use changes could bring considerable effects.

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

135

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C46

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Herekino Harbour

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

 Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Herekino Harbour. - tributary rivers and streams - Sheltered Coast. RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

HERITAGE VALUE PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 - pockets of vegetation  Cultural Associations associated with coastal landform. Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - limited built development found RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5 in immediate proximity to coast

136

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - moderately contained – sense of broad enclosure by surrounding hills To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- vegetation patterns tend to be somewhat √ fragmented

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - plantation forest and recent planting on adjacent dune beginning to dominate northern coast

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - screening by vegetation pockets - variable distribution of screening vegetation  Land Uses - impact of pine plantation (indicative of broad scale - limited impact of existing built development How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which modification) - limited topographic screening – landform tends to are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - degree of enclosure found with side inlets focus out on harbour  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 5  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 6

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

137

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on local roads - Small.  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- extremely limited built development in close proximity to harbour

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

√ 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

138

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C47

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Between Herekino and Whangape

Harbour mouths PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Reeflined coast.

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - expansive reefs running out to - strong coastal ridgeline and sea  Complexity/ Diversity flank running down to shore To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - succession of small headlands (adjacent unit) elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 5  Legibility STRUCTURES: To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Tasman sea ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - exposed coast the landscape that is immediately visible? 7

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations - very bold and simple Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the composition of coastal edge locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - lack of visible built development - continuity of pasture along with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - coast

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

139

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - quite open and exposed – land - partial containment by low focuses out to sea headland

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

√ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: - limited degree of vegetative variety (although this (extremely low) (v.high) adds to the rather bleak character of unit)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- small areas of erosion due to grazing of the coastal bank

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

140

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - users of coastal walkway - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - local farmers - Small.  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

141

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C48

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Whangape Harbour Mouth.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Harbour Mouths. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - powerful and regular “fiord like” - steep coastal banks -fringing reef and pebbly shore at gulch foot of bank  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6  Cohesion - pockets of coastal shrubland on Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character bank and sense of unity? 6 STRUCTURES:  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7 WATER BODIES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Whangape Harbour. ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Sheltered Coast. the landscape that is immediately visible? 7

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 7 PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO HERITAGE VALUE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations - sweeping linear form of terrain Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5  Cultural Associations - sense of “reversion to nature” - lack of built development Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings -

RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

142

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - very contained and focussed - impressive and dominant scale of landscape To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 7

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

northern bank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√ - vegetation patterns rather fragmented (although showing signs of unifying through regeneration (extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - landscape modified as rough pasture - lack of existing built development, forestry etc  Land Uses - limited capacity for vegetative screening How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - lack of topographic screening are highly developed and urbanized? 6 - bold, simple form of terrain  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 7  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 7

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 7

143

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - walkers on “golden stairs” track - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - local residents and travellers on local roads - Small  Residential Areas (extremely restricted view)  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- an extremely dramatic landscape which is unique within the district

√ 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

144

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C49

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Inner Whangape Harbour.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine inlets and harbours. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE AESTHETIC VALUE CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER

Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings): TOPOGRAPHY:  Vividness - winding convoluted form of - riverside form of upper unit How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, coast diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - extensive intertidal flats  Complexity/ Diversity - containment of surrounding To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of landform elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - dominance of mangrove in and sense of unity? 5 upper reaches of unit  Legibility - areas of saltmarsh and reedbed To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the -pockets of indigenous shrubland clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - Te Aupouri Pa ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Pawarenga Church the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - older marae meeting houses

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 WATER BODIES:

- Whangape Harbour HERITAGE VALUE - Rotokakahi River - Awaroa River (Sheltered coast) To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - interlocking of harbour / rivers - pockets of vegetation and landform associated with coast RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 6 LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- houses typically sited on - pastoral patterns relate well to coastal flats, not more dominant landform backdrop hills

145

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - broadly contained and enclosed - stronger sense of intimacy in upper portions of unit

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - Whangape Road and Pawarenga Road dominate particular values found within the individual unit): coastal bridge

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

- loss of coastal margin vegetation from many parts √ of unit (largely through grazing)

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - many buildings too close to coastal edge and therefore affect values

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - existing levels of built development - substantial parts of unit without built development  Land Uses - screening by vegetation - variable distribution of screening vegetation How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - varied line of coast particularly on flats are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - limited topographic screening elements  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

146

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local residents - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - Travellers on local roads - Small.  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- importance of relationship of marae and chapels with the coast 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

147

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C50

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Between Hokianga and Whangape

Harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: expansive exposed beaches

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - sweeping open beaches - steep inland hills  Complexity/ Diversity - backshore “foothills” at base of - outcrops of reefs To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of hills inland elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - areas of indigenous dune - patches of manuka shrubland and sense of unity? 5 vegetation  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Tasman sea. the landscape that is immediately visible? 6 - Exposed coast.

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - subtle merging of pasture and locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 5 scrubland  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 4 - belt of pasture along coastal edge RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 5

148

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite open and expansive - landform focuses out to sea

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

STRUCTURES: COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one - power poles, wires etc around Mitimiti landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

√ - inland scarring and erosion - rather fragmented vegetation patterns

(extremely low) (v.high) PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- intrusion of Mitimiti – poorly integrated - impact of forestry inland of southern portion of unit.

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - existing impact of Mitimiti settlement - limited distribution of existing built development  Land Uses - variations and depressions in terrain - sensitivity of open flanks, ridges and How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which “promontories” in coastal alignments are highly developed and urbanized? 4 - very limited capacity for screening by vegetation  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

149

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents of Mitimiti - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on coastal road to Mitimiti - Small.  Residential Areas - farmers and forestry workers - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

- future intensification of subdivision around Mitimiti will dramatically increase the impact of the settlement 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - considerable scope for amelioration around Mitimiti

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

150

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C51

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Hokianga Harbour Mouth.

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Harbour Mouths. PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 7 - Te Pauahi Dune - steep coastal bank around - coastal bench containing South Head and Kawehitiki Point Opononi and Omapere  Complexity/ Diversity - Pukekohe and South Head To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - contain and even channel - backdrop hills to south and - sandy beaches elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 north east  Cohesion VEGETATION: Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character and sense of unity? 6 - substantial belts of indigenous - amenity plantings, pines and  Legibility shrubland along coastal banks pohutakawa at Omapere and To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the Opononi clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery - Jetties at Opononi and Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and Omapere confer relationship ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond between settlement and harbour the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 WATER BODIES: RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 - Hokianga Harbour. HERITAGE VALUE - Sheltered Coast.

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 7 BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association - Dune and south head crate - belts of shrubland reinforce with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 5 bastion-like containment coastal bank (visually) LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 - housing predominantly - pine forest in north west of unit associated with coastal bench largely contained behind yet kept back from immediate shrubland coastal edge

151

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - broadly contained by landform - sense of human scale on beach and in settlement - contained views out to sea between heads To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6

ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

vegetation (particularly most recent – see below) of the coast 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 VEGETATION:

√

(extremely low) (v.high) BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- recent subdivision to west of Opononi starting to - presence of semi-intensive settlement ascend foothills

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

 Topographic Type & Diversity

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 3

152

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents and visitors to Omapere and Opononi - moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - travellers on SH12 -moderate  Residential Areas - travellers on local roads - Small.  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - recreational coastline users - Small/ Moderate  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - boat passengers - small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 5 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - Te Pouahi Sandhill, Mt Paeoa and Pukekohe Headland and associated ridge of extreme sensitivity

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

153

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: C52 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Inner Hokianga Harbour

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlet and Harbours

PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - “flatness” of harbour and -varied and convoluted line of - expansive flats and wetland intertidal mudflats harbour edge areas  Complexity/ Diversity To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of - enclosing hills - winding course of rivers elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7 - coastal banks and headlands  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character VEGETATION: and sense of unity? 6 - extensive belts of mangrove - coastal bank vegetation - amenity plantings especially  Legibility those around historic areas To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the - belts and pockets of saltmarsh clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and and wetland ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 6 STRUCTURES:  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and - township wharves - small jetties ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - small marae, chapels & churches the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - historic piled buildings on water RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6 WATER BODIES:

- Hokianga Harbour. - small streams HERITAGE VALUE - tributary rivers - Sheltered Coast. To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:

 Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 7 CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO  Cultural Associations CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - ever changing arms and inlets - matrix of pasture and pockets RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7 of harbour of bush LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE):

- housing largely well sited in bays or clustered in settlements

154

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - vary between expansive and - varying vistas and spatial very enclosed in upper reaches qualities

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 6 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the - modern toilet block at Rawhiti particular values found within the individual unit): - other “modern” buildings in heritage settlements

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - overhead services and poles VEGETATION:

√ - vegetation patterns of many areas rather (extremely low) (v.high) fragmented

BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS:

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- impact of roading and associated cuttings - oyster farms fragment intertidal flats

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually - existing built development particularly around - varied distribution of built development absorb change without significant modification of its character: villages  Land Uses - exposure and openness of coastal flats, How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - varied topography and coastal alignment headlands, open flanks and ridgelines are highly developed and urbanized? 5 - screening by vegetation and blocks of bush - variable distribution of screening vegetation  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 4

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

155

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - residents of settlements and villages - small to moderate How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - farmers and rural developers - small  Residential Areas - boat passengers - small  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity - travellers on SH12 - moderate to large  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes - travellers on local roads - small  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 3 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS - sensitivity of mangrove and rushbed fringes

- historical atmosphere of Kohukohu, Horeke and Rawene (Derived from both the Value and Vulnerability ratings – with an indication of over-riding factors where the - importance of uncluttered context of chapels and marae around coast final rating is not the average of those for value and Vulnerability).

SUPPLEMENTARY COMMENTS 7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY - an extremely convoluted and varied unit 6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

156

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C53

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Between Hokianga Harbour Mouth and

Maunganui Bluff PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Reef lined coast

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - strong belts of reef running out - well defined coastal bank to sea  Complexity/ Diversity - subtle headlands create a To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of sense of mystery elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 6 VEGETATION:  Cohesion Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character - pockets of indigenous - occasional clumps of and sense of unity? 6 shrubland – largely manuka pohutakawa  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 5  Mystery WATER BODIES: Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Tasman Sea the landscape that is immediately visible? 7 - Exposed coast

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of: BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER):  Endemic Associations Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - stepped separation between locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 4 shoreline and inland terrain  Cultural Associations LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings - - absence of built development -pasture confined to least steep terrain adjacent to coast RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 4

157

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - quite open and exposed - containment at toe of coastal bank

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 5 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - pampas invasion of coastal bank in southern part of unit √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high) - extensive scarring and slipping of coastal bank resulting from vegetation clearance PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION: - Waipoua plantation impacts on southern extent of unit

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - subtly varied line of coast - focus of landform onto coast  Land Uses - lack of existing built development How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which - extremely limited screening by vegetation are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 6  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 7

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 6

158

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - local farmers and forestry workers - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of:  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 1 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY

√ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

159

FAR NORTH DISTRICT LANDSCAPE UNIT IDENTIFICATION

LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET NUMBER: C54

LANDSCAPE CHARACTER UNITS DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION: Waimamaku Inlet – Kaikai Beach

LANDSCAPE CATEGORY: Estuarine Inlets and Harbours PART 1. VALUE ATTACHED TO THE LANDSCAPE

AESTHETIC VALUE PHYSICAL ELEMENTS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

CRITICAL ELEMENTS IMPORTANT ELEMENTS ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO LANDSCAPE CHARACTER Field evaluation of Aesthetic Value using the following criteria (with individual ratings):  Vividness TOPOGRAPHY: How immediately impressive and memorable is the landscape as a result of its visual distinctiveness, diversity or other factors – both compositional and geo-physical? 6 - strongly enclosing hills - winding inlet course - inland opening  Complexity/ Diversity - enclosed spit - distant enclosure of hills To what extent does the unit have a sense of richness and interest about it arising from the diversity of VEGETATION: elements found within it – without that diversity leading to discontinuity? 7  Cohesion - pockets of pohutakawa and - sand dune vegetation Is there a continuity of key statements / patterns / themes / accents that give the landscape both character coastal bank manuka and sense of unity? 6 - waterside reeds and saltmarsh  Legibility To what extent is it possible to develop a clear mental image of the unit’s landscape because of: i) the STRUCTURES: clear definition of features and patterns within it that emphasize its 3 dimensional structure (layering); and ii) identifiable landmarks (points of focus and reference)? 7  Mystery Does the landscape’s spatial structure and array of elements promote a sense of sequence and WATER BODIES: ‘enticement’ through the unit’s space: the promise of ‘more to unfold around the next bend’ – just beyond - Kaikai Inlet - Waimamaku River the landscape that is immediately visible? 5 - Tasman Sea

RATING FOR AESTHETIC VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) ………………. 6

PATTERNS & COMPOSITIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCE LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE HERITAGE VALUE CRITICAL TO LANDSCAPE IMPORTANT IN TERMS OF ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER LANDSCAPE CHARACTER To what extent does the unit reveal and convey a distinctive sense of identity because of:  Endemic Associations BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS (EG BLOCKS OF VEGETATION & OPEN SPACE, LAND & WATER): Arising from natural elements in the landscape that contribute to the character and sense of place of the - natural flow and patterning of locality and Region, e.g. The islands of the Hauraki Gulf, remnant Kauri forest 6 landscape  Cultural Associations Arising from man-made landscape elements that are distinctive and valued because of their association LAND USE LOCATION PATTERNS (EG TYPICAL SITING OF HOUSES, FARM FORESTRY, PASTURE): with both Maori and Pakeha cultures, e.g. old pa sites, historic buildings 7 - “built” development (casual baches) well screened RATING FOR HERITAGE VALUE (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high value) …………… 7

160

RARITY SPATIAL CHARACTERISTICS: - Quite enclosed - sense of separation from the open sea

To what extent is the unit or key elements within it rare or even unique at the Regional Level

RATING FOR RARITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high volume) …… 4 ELEMENTS & PATTERNS THAT ADVERSELY AFFECT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER & VALUE

PROMINENT ELEMENTS NOTICEABLE ELEMENTS

COMPOSITE VALUE RATING (NB. This rating is not an average – it would be rare to find any one STRUCTURES: landscape that achieves high ratings for aesthetic value, heritage value and rarity – but it should reflect the particular values found within the individual unit): VEGETATION: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - loss of natural vegetation patterns near sea as unit moves inland √ BROAD LANDSCAPE PATTERNS: (extremely low) (v.high)

PATTERNS OF LAND USE LOCATION:

- intrusion of adjacent road

- minor impact by “baches” near sea

PART 2. VULNERABILITY TO CHANGE

VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO VISUAL ABSORPTION CAPABILITY ELEMENTS THAT HEIGHTEN VAC: ELEMENTS THAT REDUCE VAC: Field evaluation of VAC using the following criteria to determine the capacity of the unit or view to visually absorb change without significant modification of its character: - screening by vegetation and most mature trees - limited existing visible built development  Land Uses - minor variation gives (limited) scope for - simplicity of landscape unit How ‘developed’ is the existing landscape – from areas that are primarily native and natural to those which integration are highly developed and urbanized? 6  Vegetation Cover & Type How extensive and varied is existing vegetation cover – from no cover and monocultural dominance to a high level of vegetated cover and diverse species? 4  Topographic Type & Diversity Does the unit’s terrain assist or limit viewing because of its character and the viewing angles that would typically arise between vantage areas and locations subject to modification – from the simplicity and openness of a plain or shallow ridgeline to incised foot hills with a high level of visual containment? 5

OVERALL RATING FOR V.A.C (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely low VAC) ………………. 5

161

EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY AUDIENCES THEIR RELATIVE SCALE - visitors and fishermen at Kaikai Beach - Small. How visually exposed is the unit / sub-unit / view to the likes of: - local farmers - very small.  Residential Areas  Areas of recreational Use And tourism Activity  Public transport Routes And tourist Routes  Commercial Areas

RATING FOR EXPOSURE / VISIBILITY (1-7, with 7 indicating extremely high exposure….. 2 COMPOSITE VULNRABILITY RATING:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

√

(extremely low) (v.high)

OVERALL SENSITIVITY CLASS OVER-RIDING FACTORS

7. EXTREME SENSITIVITY

6. HIGH SENSITIVITY √ 5. SIGNIFICANT SENSITIVITY

4. MODERATE SENSITIVITY

3. LIMITED SENSITIVITY

2. LOW SENSITIVITY

1. NO / VERY LOW SENSITIVITY

162