DOCSLIB.ORG

Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019 Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Assessment of Acoustic Effects Document ID Project number 254914 File path Client New Zealand Transport Agency Client contact Jane Price Client reference Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) A. Liberona 1 6 December 2017 Draft for client review J. Grimes F. Parr R. Wareing 2 17 July 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 3 25 September 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 4 16 December 2019 Minor Amendments J. Ngo H. Miller - Current revision 4 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name J. Ngo Name Title Acoustic Engineer Title Project 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx 16 December 2019 Revision 4 Contents 1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Purpose of this Report ........................................................................................................... 8 3 Site Description ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Existing noise environment .................................................................................................... 9 Measurement details ........................................................................................... 9 Long-term noise measurements ....................................................................... 10 Short-term noise measurements ....................................................................... 10 Summary of results ........................................................................................... 11 4 Construction Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................ 12 4.1 Construction noise ............................................................................................................... 12 Criteria ............................................................................................................... 12 Assessment ....................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Construction Vibration ......................................................................................................... 16 Criteria ............................................................................................................... 16 Assessment ....................................................................................................... 16 5 Operational Noise and Vibration ................................................................................................... 19 5.1 Operational noise................................................................................................................. 19 Criteria ............................................................................................................... 19 Protected Premises and Facilities ..................................................................... 19 Assessment ....................................................................................................... 20 5.2 Operational vibration ........................................................................................................... 24 Criteria ............................................................................................................... 24 Assessment ....................................................................................................... 24 6 Recommendations.......................................................................................................................... 26 6.1 Construction noise and vibration ......................................................................................... 26 Management strategy ........................................................................................ 26 Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan ....................................... 26 General good practice ....................................................................................... 27 Site specific mitigation ....................................................................................... 27 6.2 Operational noise and vibration ........................................................................................... 28 7 Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 29 7.1 Construction Noise and Vibration ........................................................................................ 29 7.2 Operational Noise ................................................................................................................ 29 Project number 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx, 16 December 2019 Revision 4 3 Appendices Appendix A Relevant Standards, Guidelines, and Rules Far North District Plan – Rural Environment Site zoning Construction Noise Construction Vibration Standards and Guidelines NZS 6803:1999 BS5228-1 BS5228-2 DIN4150-3 Appendix B Operational Noise Contours Appendix C Construction Noise Contours Appendix D Construction Vibration Contours Appendix E List of equipment used for noise assessment Figures Figure 1 Proposed works Figure 2 Project location Figure 3 Noise measurement locations Figure 4 MP2 - View from monitoring station towards Kaeo Bridge Figure 5 MP4 – Monitoring location Figure 6 Far North District Plan (Map 21) and proposed road alignment Tables Table 1 Details of long term noise logger Table 2 Details of hand-held sound level meter Table 3 Noise logger measurement results – MP1, 12th to 18th September 2017 Table 4 Short-term noise measurements results, 12th September 2017 Table 5 Construction noise limits for all properties surrounding the Project Table 6 Required stand-off distance to achieve 70 dB LAeq Table 7 Predicted noise levels at PPFs during construction activities relating to the main alignment and bridge works Table 8 List of PPFs exceeding morning and daytime noise criteria for specific construction activities. Table 9 Vibration limits for buildings around the construction site Table 10 Vibration levels at PPFs due to piling or stone column construction activities Table 11 Vibration levels at PPFs due to dynamic compaction Table 12 NZS 6806:2010 noise criteria Table 13 Modelling parameters Project number 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx, 16 December 2019 Revision 4 4 Table 14 Road traffic details Table 15 Comparison of measured and predicted (modelled) noise levels Table 16 Noise categories (As specified in NZS 6806:2010 for an altered road) Table 17 Predicted free-field noise levels at PPFs Table 18 Distance between proposed alignments and PPFs Table 19 Hierarchy of controls for the Project Table 20 Construction noise limits for all properties surrounding the Kaeo bridge replacement Table 21 NZS6803-1999 Noise Guidelines for residential receivers (values taken from Table 2 in NZS6803-1999) Table 22 Transient vibration guidelines for cosmetic damage (replicated from Table B.2 from BS 5228- 2:2009) Table 23 Subjective evaluation of vibration (replicated from Table B.1 from BS 5228-2:2009) Table 24 Vibration guidelines for short-term vibration on structures (replicated from Table 1 from DIN4150-3: 1992-02) Table 25 Acoustic Data used in Construction Assessment Table 26 List of construction activities and cumulative noise levels Project number 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx, 16 December 2019 Revision 4 5 1 Executive Summary Aurecon has been engaged by the New Zealand Transport Agency (Transport Agency) to provide an assessment of noise and vibration effects for the proposed SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project. This report provides an assessment of both the operational and construction noise and vibration effects of the project. New Zealand Standard 6806:2010 is an industry accepted benchmark for assessment of reasonable effects under Section 16 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Therefore, assessment of road traffic noise in accordance with the standard represents the Best Practicable Option (BPO) for assessing operational road traffic noise and has been applied to the Project. Computational noise modelling for the existing and proposed road alignment has been conducted to predict road traffic noise emissions to the surrounding environment. An assessment of the results has been undertaken in accordance with NZS6806:2010.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Assets Under a Civil Engineering Completed Risks Insurance Policy
    ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME 2015 Completed by Jonathan Santos Asset Management Plan – Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Contents KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME ............................................................... 1 Contents .................................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Relationship with Other Planning Documents .................................................. 6 2.1.3 Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan ........................................................ 6 2.1.4 Key Stakeholder ................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Ownership ................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Justification for Ownership................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Organisation Vision, Mission, Goals & Objectives ............................................. 7 2.3 Sophistication/Limitation of the AMP ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mahinepua Peninsula Historic Heritage Assessment 2011
    Mahinepua Peninsula Historic Heritage Assessment Bay of Islands Area Office Melina Goddard 2011 Mahinepua Peninsula: Historic Heritage Assessment Melina Goddard, DoC, Bay of Islands Area Office 2011 Cover image: Mahinepua Peninsula facing north east. The two peaks have P04/ to the front and P04/55 in the background. K. Upperton DoC Peer-reviewed by: Joan Maingay and Andrew Blanshard Publication information © Copyright New Zealand Department of Conservation (web pdf # needed) In the interest of forest conservation, DOC Science Publishing supports paperless electronic publishing. 2 Contents Site overview 5 Prehistoric description 5 Historic description 6 Fabric description 7 Cultural connections 10 National context 10 Prehistoric and historic significance 11 Fabric significance 11 Cultural significance 12 Management recommendations 12 Management chronology 12 Management documentation 13 Sources 13 Appendix: site record forms Endnotes Image: taken from pa site P04/55 facing west towards Stephenson Island 3 Figure 1: Location of Mahinepua Peninsula in the Whangaroa region Site overview Mahinepua Peninsula is located on the east coast of Northland in the Northern Bay of Islands, approximately 8km east of the Whangaroa Harbour. The peninsula has panoramic views of Stephenson Island to the west and the Cavalli Islands to the east. Mahinepua was gazetted as a scenic reserve in 1978 and there is a 2.5km public access track that runs to the end of the peninsula. It is located within a rich prehistoric and historic region and has 14 recorded archaeological
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand
    A supplementary finding-aid to the archives relating to Maori Schools held in the Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand MAORI SCHOOL RECORDS, 1879-1969 Archives New Zealand Auckland holds records relating to approximately 449 Maori Schools, which were transferred by the Department of Education. These schools cover the whole of New Zealand. In 1969 the Maori Schools were integrated into the State System. Since then some of the former Maori schools have transferred their records to Archives New Zealand Auckland. Building and Site Files (series 1001) For most schools we hold a Building and Site file. These usually give information on: • the acquisition of land, specifications for the school or teacher’s residence, sometimes a plan. • letters and petitions to the Education Department requesting a school, providing lists of families’ names and ages of children in the local community who would attend a school. (Sometimes the school was never built, or it was some years before the Department agreed to the establishment of a school in the area). The files may also contain other information such as: • initial Inspector’s reports on the pupils and the teacher, and standard of buildings and grounds; • correspondence from the teachers, Education Department and members of the school committee or community; • pre-1920 lists of students’ names may be included. There are no Building and Site files for Church/private Maori schools as those organisations usually erected, paid for and maintained the buildings themselves. Admission Registers (series 1004) provide details such as: - Name of pupil - Date enrolled - Date of birth - Name of parent or guardian - Address - Previous school attended - Years/classes attended - Last date of attendance - Next school or destination Attendance Returns (series 1001 and 1006) provide: - Name of pupil - Age in years and months - Sometimes number of days attended at time of Return Log Books (series 1003) Written by the Head Teacher/Sole Teacher this daily diary includes important events and various activities held at the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo Courtesy of Tony Foster
    Photo courtesy of Tony Foster WHANGAROA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2011- 2036 STAGE 1 – DRAFT PLAN FOR CONSULTATION 2 WHANGAROA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD P ages 4- 5 OUR VISION STATEMENT Page 6 A PROFILE OF WHANGAROA Pages 7- 9 KEY TO ABBREVIATIONS Page 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS INTRODUCTION Page 11 1. THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT Pages 12- 13 2. THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Pages 14 - 1 7 3. THE PEOPLE Pages 18- 21 4. CULTURAL GOALS Pages 22- 25 5. ECONOMIC GOALS a) FARMING & FORESTRY Page 27- 29 b) FISHING & AQUACULTURE Page 30- 31 c) INITIATIVES & EVENTS Page 32- 33 d) TOURISM Page 34- 35 e) ARTISANSHIP Page 36 APPENDIX DEMOGRAPHICS 1. MAPS Page 37 2. LOCAL STATISTICS Pages 38- 39 3. DEVELOPMENT PROFILE Pages 40- 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Page 43 3 FOREWORD THE PURPOSE & VALUE OF THE WHANGAROA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Whangaroa Community Development Plan (WCDP) has come about because a small group of residents expressed their concerns for the harbour and its surrounding environment to the Far North District Council, and talked of the need for an “integrated catchment management plan”. The Far North District Council’s response was to offer the community the opportunity of creating a Community Development Plan which included the concepts of catchment integration and sustainable management. A Community Development Plan is a document created by a community. It is an expression of the community’s vision and aspirations for their land, waters and people for the medium-term future. As such, it firstly has to seek those visions and aspirations. In the case of this plan, that work took place in a series of public meetings held through 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bible's Early Journey in NZ
    The Bible’s Early Journey in New Zealand THE ARRIVAL It was so difficult in fact, that six years later Johnson was joined by an assistant. The Reverend Samuel Marsden, Towards the end of the 18th century, with the loss of later to be remembered by history as the Apostle to America’s 13 colonies in the American Revolution, Britain New Zealand, was studying at Cambridge University looked towards Asia, Africa and the Pacific to expand when he was convinced through the influence of William its empire. With Britain’s overburdened penal system, Wilberforce to become assistant chaplain to the penal expanding the empire into the newly discovered eastern colony at Port Jackson (by this time the original penal coast of Australia through the establishment of a penal colony settlement at Botany Bay had been moved). colony seemed like a decent solution. So, in 1787, six Marsden jumped at the chance to put his faith into transport ships with 775 convicts set sail for Botany Bay, practice and boarded a ship bound for Australia. He later to be renamed Sydney. arrived in Port Jackson with his wife in 1794. Thanks to the last minute intervention of philanthropist Marsden established his house at Parramatta just John Thornton and Member of Parliament William outside the main settlement at Port Jackson. There Wilberforce, a chaplain was included on one of the he oversaw his 100 acre farm as well as consenting ships. The Reverend Richard Johnson was given the to serve as a magistrate and as superintendent of unenviable task of being God’s representative in this government affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Book, 1789-92
    ~ 1 ~ KAIHU THE DISTRICT RIPIRO WEST COAST SOUTH HOKIANGA HISTORY REFERENCE JOURNAL THREE THE COUPLING OF CULTURES PHOTO BELOW SALT AND PEPPER A SPRINKLING OF MAORI AND EUROPEAN CHILDREN AT THE KAIHU SCHOOL ~ 2 ~ CHAPTERS INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 6 PAGE 5 FOY FAMILY PAGE 149 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 7 SNOWDEN-PATUAWA-FLAVELL- Foy-Sherman SHERMAN FAMILY PAGE 154 PAGE 6 CHAPTER 8 CHAPTER 2 WHITEHEAD AND BAKER FAMILY SNOWDEN-FAMILY HISTORY PAGE 178 PAGE 10 CHAPTER 9 CHAPTER 3 ARTHUR MOLD SNOWDEN-PATUAWA/NATHAN CONNECTION PAGE 194 PAGE 38 CHAPTER 10 CHAPTER 4 NEW ZEALAND - SOUTH AFRICAN WAR NETANA PATUAWA PAGE 212 PAGE 43 CHAPTER 5 SOURCES/BIBLIOGRAPHY FLAVELL FAMILY PAGE 219 PAGE 142 ~ 3 ~ Note: Intermarriage between Maori and Pakeha has been common from the early days of European settlement in New Zealand. The very early government’s encouraged intermarriage, which was seen as a means of ‘civilizing’ Maori. However, some people did disapprove of the ‘Coupling of Cultures’ 1 1 FULL STORY BY ANGELA WANHALLA MAIN IMAGE: MERE AND ALEXANDER COWAN WITH BABY PITA, 1870 ~ 4 ~ NOTE: WHANAU=FAMILY HAPU=CLAN IWI=TRIBE TAUA=WAR PARTY ARIKI=LEADER/CHIEF AOTEA OR NEW ZEALAND WHAPU/KAIHU=DARGAVILLE WHAKATEHAUA=MAUNGANUI BLUFF OPANAKI=MODERN DAY KAIHU It is my wish to have all of my ‘history research journals’ available to all learning centres of Northland with the hope that current and future generations will be able to easily find historical knowledge of the Kaihu River Valley, the Northern Ripiro West Coast and South West Hokianga. BELOW: COMPUTER DRAWN MAP SHOWING THE PLACE NAMES BETWEEN MANGAWHARE AND SOUTH HOKIANGA ~ 5 ~ INTRODUCTION Note: These following characters or families give a fine example of the connection between Polynesian and European people of the North and also their connection to the Hokianga, Kaihu River Valley and North Kaipara districts where some became prominent families of the Kaihu Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: a Compilation
    Title page July 2017 Working Paper 2017/04 Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Working Paper 2017/04 Fact Sheets on Existing Initiatives: A compliation July 2017 Title Working Paper 2017/04 – Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Published Copyright © McGuinness Institute, July 2017 ISBN 978-1-98-851842-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-1-98-851843-5 (PDF) This document is available at www.mcguinnessinstitute.org and may be reproduced or cited provided the source is acknowledged. Prepared by The McGuinness Institute, as part of the TacklingPovertyNZ project. Authors Alexander Jones and Ali Bunge Research team Ella Reilly and Eleanor Merton For further information McGuinness Institute Phone (04) 499 8888 Level 2, 5 Cable Street PO Box 24222 Wellington 6142 New Zealand www.mcguinnessinstitute.org Disclaimer The McGuinness Institute has taken reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of any such website or other source. Publishing This publication has been produced by companies applying sustainable practices within their businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth with Vision
    visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 VISION KERIKERI Growth with Vision Newsletter No 78 | December 2019 Thoughts for the New Chair for Vision Kerikeri day “Progress is measured It is with regret that the Vision Kerikeri (VKK) committee has by the speed at which accepted David Clendon’s resignation from Chair and we destroy the Committee-membership. David resigned in order to avoid conditions that sustain any potential conflicts of interest, following his election as a councillor to the Far North District Council. On behalf of VKK life.” George Monbiot we offer David our proud congratulations and thank him for “The problem with his contributions. comprehension is, it At the following often comes too late.” meeting, committee Rasmenia Massoud, Human member Jo Lumkong was chosen to chair VKK Detritus for the remainder of the Contact Us current year of operation. Fortunately, Our email address is: Jo accepted the [email protected] position despite of her already numerous active We also regularly update our community website engagements like www.visionkerikeri.org.nz Tuhono 200, Our Follow us on Kerikeri and The Facebook: Illumination Workshop. Jo’s big picture thinking New Chair - Jo Lumkong https:// and creativity as interior www.facebook.com/ and product designer visionkerikeri/ are based on her understanding how environment impacts culture, productivity and human psychology. She is also the mother of her two children (10 and 12 years). For more detailed information about Jo, have a look at her Pepeha (PDF). Newsletter No 78 1 visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 Wairoa Stream Projects Spring Time Those of you who regularly walk the Wairoa Stream will be aware of the improvements to the track since it was opened in April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader
    Aurecon New Zealand Limited T +64 9 520 6019 Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road F +64 9 524 7815 Newmarket Auckland 1023 E [email protected] PO Box 9762 W aurecongroup.com Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand 2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader – Resource Consents Far North District Council 5 Memorial Ave Kaikohe 0405 Dear Louise, Following the pre-application meeting which was held with both Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council on 14th November 2019, please find attached a Notice of Requirement and an Outline Plan of Works waiver to alter the designation for State highway 10 at Kaeo, and to replace the existing single-lane bridge with a two-lane bridge. During the pre-lodgement meeting the following matters were covered: Project Scope Discussion of the effects of the project on the existing and surrounding environment, and how these effects can be avoided, remedied or mitigated so that the effects are less than minor Establishment that there are no affected persons, except for those properties within the proposed designation footprint with whom property purchase discussions are underway. It is recommended that the Notice of Requirement is limited notified to the land owners within the Notice of Requirement boundary. For your information, a resource consent application for this project (application number APP.041470.01.01) is being lodged with Northland Regional Council concurrently with the Notice of Requirement. It is being recommended that the resource consent application is non-notified, as for resource consenting purposes, the relevant environmental effects on persons within and near the project area are less than minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohakiri Pa St Paul's Rock Scenic Reserve Historic Heritage
    Ohakiri Pa St Paul’s Rock Scenic Reserve Historic Heritage Assessment Melina Goddard 2011 Ohakiri Pa: St Paul’s Rock Scenic Reserve Historic Heritage Assessment Melina Goddard, DoC, Bay of Islands Area Office 2011 Cover image: Ohakiri pa/St Paul’s Rock taken facing south (A. Blanshard DoC) Aerial of St Paul’s Rock/Ohakiri pa. Peer-reviewed by: Joan Maingay, Andrew Blanshard Publication information © Copyright New Zealand Department of Conservation (web pdf # needed) 2 Contents Site Overview 5 History Description 5 Fabric Description 10 Cultural Connections 12 National Context 12 Historic Significance 13 Fabric Significance 13 Cultural Significance 13 Management Recommendations 13 Management Documentation 14 Management Chronology 14 Sources 16 Endnotes 17 Image: Entrance to the Whangaroa Harbour taken facing northeast from the top of the Dukes Nose (K. Upperton DoC). 3 Figure 1: The location of Ohakiri Pa in the St Paul’s Rock Reserve, Whang aroa Harbour, indicated in inset. Site Overview Ohakiri Pa or St Paul’s Rock, as it is better known as today, is located within the St Paul’s Rock Scenic Reserve which is under the care of the Department of Conservation. The Reserve consists of two blocks, the northern and southern, on a peninsula that projects out into the Whangaroa Harbour on Northland’s east coast (fig 1). The rock is part of the Maori legend that tells of the formation of the harbour and today it is a significant landmark within the district and commands the inner harbour. Ohakiri is regionally significant as one of the only accessible tangible remains of Whangaroa’s early Maori and European history.
    [Show full text]
  • Williams and Heke: an Assessment P
    A QUESTION OF MANA The relationship between Henry Williams and Hone Heke Samuel D. Carpenter A Research Exercise towards completion of a P.G.Dip.Arts in History, Massey University, Albany, New Zealand. November 2004 2 Contents Abbreviations p. 3 Chapter 1: Introduction p. 4 Chapter 2: Beating Swords into Ploughshares p. 8 Chapter 3: The Magna Charta of the Maori p. 18 Chapter 4: Slaves of the Flagstaff p. 25 Chapter 5: A Question of Mana p. 38 Chapter 6: Williams and Heke: An Assessment p. 50 Bibliography p. 55 Research Exercise 148.799 Samuel D. Carpenter 3 Abbreviations AIM - Auckland Institute and Museum Library APL – Auckland Public Library CMS – Church Mission Society GBPP – Great Britain Parliamentary Papers GNZMA, GNZMS – Grey Papers, APL HWs – Henry Williams JPS – Journal of the Polynesian Society MS 91/75 – Algar Williams’ collection/ Williams papers, AIM NZJH – New Zealand Journal of History NIV – New International Version of the Bible. WWs – William Williams Note on Quotations: I have used [ ] square brackets to make grammatical or other sense of the quotation; however I have not usually corrected the spelling of place names or persons’ names in the same way unless it is necessary to clarify the reference. For similar reasons I have not used ‘[sic]’ unless clarification is required. Research Exercise 148.799 Samuel D. Carpenter 4 Chapter 1 - Introduction There appear to be few studies that have investigated, as their central purpose, the relationship of leading individuals from Maoridom and the New Zealand missionary body. So what kind of relationship did a 19 th century Evangelical missionary have with a native chief? This is the central question that has shaped this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Maori Mythology Page 66 Page 20 B
    ~ 1 ~ KAIHU THE DISTRICT NORTH RIPIRO WEST COAST SOUTH HOKIANGA HISTORY AND LEGEND REFERENCE JOURNAL ONE 1300-1900 AD FROM THE SEA WE CAME ALL COLOURS AND CREEDS HISTORICAL AND LEGENDARY STORIES OF THOSE WHO SAILED IN OCEAN GOING CRAFT TO AOTEA/NEW ZEALAND FROM AFAR Kupe’s wife Hine-te-Aparangi who on sighting land said “He ao, he Aotea, he Aotea”, it is a white cloud, a white cloud,” and so, therefore, this land became known as… ‘Aotea’ Land of the white cloud. ~ 2 ~ CHAPTERS CHAPTER 6 MAP THOSE WHO DARE SAIL WHERE PAGE 4 OCEANS PACIFIC AND TASMAN MEET PAGE 50 PLEASE NOTE MAMARI PAGE 5 The legendary Polynesian Waka/canoe named Mamari and her sister Waka Ngatokimatawhaorua I REMEMBER PAGE 50 WAIKARA MY SPECIAL PLACE BY THE OCEAN MAY QUEEN 1871 AND 1878 Page 8 The May Queen was very significant for the arrival of some of my ‘Old People’ to Aotea. PAGE 56 CHAPTER 1 OUR JOURNEY THROUGH THE CHAPTER 7 “WINDOW OF TIME” BEGINS… WAKA AND SAILING SHIPS LEGENDS, MYTHS AND FACTS FIRST HUMANS ARRIVE IN AOTEA/NEW ZEALAND CIRCA PAGE 64 1280 THEY ARE… PAGE 16 A/. ENDEAVOUR 1769 CHAPTER 2 PAGE 66 THE BEGINNING ACCORDING TO 1/. NGATOKIMATAWHAORUA AFTER 1280 MAORI MYTHOLOGY PAGE 66 PAGE 20 B/. SAINT JEAN - BAPTISTE 1769 THE LEGEND OF MAUI AND THE MAGIC FISHHOOK PAGE 67 Page 22 2/. KURAHAUPO AFTER 1280 CHAPTER 3 PAGE 69 ORIGINS FOR THE “OLD PEOPLE” PAGE 23 C/. BERHAMPORE 1849 PAGE 71 ANCIENT POWHIRI/WHAKATAU: THE WAR SONG OF WHAKATAU 3/.
    [Show full text]