DOCSLIB.ORG

Resource Consent Application for Land Use for Te Tahaawai Marae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Resource Consent Application for Land Use for Te Tahaawai Marae , 15.1.6B Parking and 15.1.6C.1.5 Vehicle Crossing Standards in Rural and Coastal Zones Paul Hayman PO Box 250 Kaeo, 0448 New Zealand Tel 09 407 9816 Mob 027 450 5471 [email protected] RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FOR LAND USE FOR TE TAHAAWAI MARAE ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Te Tahaawai Marae Trustees 245 Weber Road Kaeo 10th August 2020 Te Tahaawai Marae 245 Weber Road Kaeo PART 1: DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY SITE Te Tahaawai Marae is located at 245 Weber Road, Kaeo. This site is Pt Te Pupuke K2 Block and is 1.8970 hectares. The site is in the Rural Production Zone of the Far North District Council District Plan. LOCATION Te Tahaawai Marae is located three kilometres South of Whangaroa Harbour, amidst farmland on the Northern boundary and undeveloped ancestral land to the South and West. Weber Road is a gravel, dead-end road that exits State Highway 10. After the Weber-Waihapa Road junction, the road narrows with its maximum width being only five metres. Weber Road is not designed for large volumes of traffic at any one time or for comfortable safe passing, making it a single lane road. There are ten residential properties on Weber Road, most being marae hapu. The road to Te Tahaawai Marae has always been in its current state for residents and while narrow in comparison to city roads, Weber Road is a normal sized road in this Rural District. There have been regular pick up and drop offs for Whangaroa Primary and High School buses and residents and visitors have easily used Weber Road going different directions at the same time, observing respectful road use. BACKGROUND Te Tahaawai was gazetted in October 1923 for the purposes of a Marae and Recreation ground for Te Tahaawai Hapu. Ko Taratara me EmiEmi nga Maunga Ko Ngatokimatawhaorua me Mataatua nga waka Ko Whaingaroa te Moana Ko Pupuke te Awa Ko Te Awaroa te Whare Tupuna Ko Te Tahaawai te Marae Ko Ngati Tahaawai te Hapu Ko Hongi Hika te Rangatira Our Whare Tupuna was the old Pupuke Native School Classroom. When the Native School Act was abolished and Maori children (Tangata Whenua) were allowed to attend main stream Pakeha schools the room was then recycled as our now Whare Tupuna on whenua that was gifted for the purpose of a Marae (and all that this entails) and Educational purposes. We have many Uri that whakapapa into Te Tahaawai under some very prominent Rangatira. There have been many Whanau Reunions, birthdays, Baptisms, Hui-a-Hapu, Hui-a-Iwi and of course our most honoured Tangihanga. We have hosted previously the Piri Mokena Labour Weekend Games. We have been a part of the Tourism Industry where we have invited Backpackers to stay on the Marae and experience life in Te Ao Maori. On the Marae, we are able to freely embrace our Tikanga, our Kawa, our History, to be proud of who we are as a people, without judgement. Our Reo flows naturally and peacefully. On our Marae we as a people, as individuals are enough as we are. Our principals, our foundations such as Aroha, 1 Te Tahaawai Marae 245 Weber Road Kaeo Manaaki, Pono, Tika, Tautoko, give us the strength to be the best we can be. We are not judged on our Skin, the clothes we wear, the colour of our eyes or hair. For whanau who live outside the Rohe, travelling home is overwhelming and provides such a boost to our wairua. Moving forward and at the completion of our Marae Rebuild, we will utilise our Marae as much as possible. I see more interaction with Government Bodies for hui, NGO’s, Mobile clinics, Diabetes classes te mea te mea te mea. I see the potential to work with schools to host, Holiday Programs, to provide the opportunity for the Whangaroa Community to be welcome to experience Te Ao Maori, not just as Tauiwi or manuhiri but as our Neighbours. Practice Rongoa, have more wananga available to the wider Community. But in no-way am I implying we will be used a Community Hall. We are Marae 100%. When my time has come and I lay my last night on this earth, it will be on the whenua of Te Tahaawai Marae where my mauri will remain well after I’m gone. PART 2: DISTRICT PLAN ZONE RULES 8.6.5 ZONE RULES 8.6.5.1 PERMITTED ACTIVITIES 8.6.5.1.1 RESIDENTIAL INTENSITY Residential development shall be limited to one unit per 12ha of land. In all cases the land shall be developed in such a way that each unit shall have at least 3,000m² for its exclusive use surrounding the unit plus a minimum of 11.7ha elsewhere on the property. Except that this rule shall not limit the use of an existing site, or a site created pursuant to Rule 13.7.2.1 (Table 13.7.2.1) for a single residential unit for a single household, provided that all other standards for permitted activities are complied with. The proposal does comply with this rule 8.6.5.1.2 SUNLIGHT No part of any building shall project beyond a 45 degree recession plane as measured inwards from any point 2m vertically above ground level on any site boundary. The proposal does comply with this rule. 8.6.5.1.3 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The maximum proportion of the gross site area covered by buildings and other impermeable surfaces shall be 15%. The total building coverage and impermeable surfaces of the site is 12.96%, therefore the proposal does comply with this rule. 8.6.5.1.4 SETBACK FROM BOUNDARIES No building shall be erected within 10m of any site boundary; with the following exceptions; (a) no accessory building shall be erected within 3m of boundaries other than road boundaries, on sites less than 5000m2; (b) no crop protection structures shall be located within 3m of boundaries; (c) no building shall be erected within 12m of any road boundary with Kerikeri Road on properties with a road frontage with Kerikeri Road between its intersection with SH10 and Cannon Drive; (d) no building for residential purposes shall be erected closer than 100m from any zone boundary with the Minerals Zone; 2 Te Tahaawai Marae 245 Weber Road Kaeo (e) no building shall be erected within the building line restriction area as marked in Appendix 6C, located immediately north of the Te Waimate Heritage Precinct. Any proposed building to be erected within this building line restriction area shall be deemed a discretionary activity and the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga will be considered an affected party to any such application made under this rule. The proposal does not comply with this rule. 8.6.5.1.5 TRAFFIC INTENSITY The Traffic Intensity Factor for a site in this zone is 60 daily one way movements, unless the site gains access off a State Highway administered by the New Zealand Transport Agency, in which case the Traffic Intensity Factor is 30 daily one way movements. The Traffic Intensity Factor shall be determined by reference to Appendix 3A in Part 4. This rule only applies when establishing a new activity or changing an activity on a site. It does not apply to existing activities, however, the Traffic Intensity Factor for the existing uses (apart from those exempted below) on site need to be taken into account when assessing new activities in order to address cumulative effects. Exemptions: A single residential unit, farming, forestry and construction traffic (associated with the establishment of an activity) are exempt from this rule. Note: Applicants are advised that where an application is required because of non compliance with this rule and the access is off a State Highway or nearby (up to 90m of an intersection with a State highway) the New Zealand Transport Agency may be considered an affected party. The capacity of the marae is 337 persons, therefore the Traffic Intensity Factor is 168 daily one way movements. The Traffic Intensity Factor for a site is 60 one-way movements, therefore the proposal doesn’t comply with the rule. 8.6.5.1.6 KEEPING OF ANIMALS (a) Any building, compound or part of a site used for factory farming or a cattery, shall be located no closer than 50m from any site boundary, except for a boundary which adjoins a Residential, Coastal Residential or Russell Township Zone, where the distance shall be a minimum of 600m. (b) Any building, compound or part of a site used for a boarding kennel shall be located no closer than 300 metres from any site boundary except for a boundary which adjoins a Residential, Coastal Residential or Russell Township Zone, where the distance shall be a minimum of 600m. The proposal does comply with the rule. 8.6.5.1.7 NOISE (a) All activities except Temporary Military Training Activities shall be so conducted as to ensure that noise from the site shall not exceed the following noise limits as measured at or within the boundary of any other site in this zone, or at any site in the Residential, Coastal Residential or Russell Township Zones, or at or within the notional boundary of any dwelling in any other rural or coastal zone: 0700 to 2200 65 dBA L10 hours 2200 to 0700 45 dBA L10 and hours 70 dBA Lmax Exemptions: The foregoing noise limits shall not apply to airport operations at Kaitaia, Kerikeri and Kaikohe including aircraft being operated during or immediately before or after flight. For the purposes of this exemption aircraft operations shall include all aircraft activity from start up to shut down of engines.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Assets Under a Civil Engineering Completed Risks Insurance Policy
    ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME 2015 Completed by Jonathan Santos Asset Management Plan – Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Contents KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME ............................................................... 1 Contents .................................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Relationship with Other Planning Documents .................................................. 6 2.1.3 Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan ........................................................ 6 2.1.4 Key Stakeholder ................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Ownership ................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Justification for Ownership................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Organisation Vision, Mission, Goals & Objectives ............................................. 7 2.3 Sophistication/Limitation of the AMP ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand
    A supplementary finding-aid to the archives relating to Maori Schools held in the Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand MAORI SCHOOL RECORDS, 1879-1969 Archives New Zealand Auckland holds records relating to approximately 449 Maori Schools, which were transferred by the Department of Education. These schools cover the whole of New Zealand. In 1969 the Maori Schools were integrated into the State System. Since then some of the former Maori schools have transferred their records to Archives New Zealand Auckland. Building and Site Files (series 1001) For most schools we hold a Building and Site file. These usually give information on: • the acquisition of land, specifications for the school or teacher’s residence, sometimes a plan. • letters and petitions to the Education Department requesting a school, providing lists of families’ names and ages of children in the local community who would attend a school. (Sometimes the school was never built, or it was some years before the Department agreed to the establishment of a school in the area). The files may also contain other information such as: • initial Inspector’s reports on the pupils and the teacher, and standard of buildings and grounds; • correspondence from the teachers, Education Department and members of the school committee or community; • pre-1920 lists of students’ names may be included. There are no Building and Site files for Church/private Maori schools as those organisations usually erected, paid for and maintained the buildings themselves. Admission Registers (series 1004) provide details such as: - Name of pupil - Date enrolled - Date of birth - Name of parent or guardian - Address - Previous school attended - Years/classes attended - Last date of attendance - Next school or destination Attendance Returns (series 1001 and 1006) provide: - Name of pupil - Age in years and months - Sometimes number of days attended at time of Return Log Books (series 1003) Written by the Head Teacher/Sole Teacher this daily diary includes important events and various activities held at the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019
    Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Assessment of Acoustic Effects Document ID Project number 254914 File path Client New Zealand Transport Agency Client contact Jane Price Client reference Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) A. Liberona 1 6 December 2017 Draft for client review J. Grimes F. Parr R. Wareing 2 17 July 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 3 25 September 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 4 16 December 2019 Minor Amendments J. Ngo H. Miller - Current revision 4 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name J. Ngo Name Title Acoustic Engineer Title Project 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx 16 December 2019 Revision 4 Contents 1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: a Compilation
    Title page July 2017 Working Paper 2017/04 Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Working Paper 2017/04 Fact Sheets on Existing Initiatives: A compliation July 2017 Title Working Paper 2017/04 – Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Published Copyright © McGuinness Institute, July 2017 ISBN 978-1-98-851842-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-1-98-851843-5 (PDF) This document is available at www.mcguinnessinstitute.org and may be reproduced or cited provided the source is acknowledged. Prepared by The McGuinness Institute, as part of the TacklingPovertyNZ project. Authors Alexander Jones and Ali Bunge Research team Ella Reilly and Eleanor Merton For further information McGuinness Institute Phone (04) 499 8888 Level 2, 5 Cable Street PO Box 24222 Wellington 6142 New Zealand www.mcguinnessinstitute.org Disclaimer The McGuinness Institute has taken reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of any such website or other source. Publishing This publication has been produced by companies applying sustainable practices within their businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth with Vision
    visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 VISION KERIKERI Growth with Vision Newsletter No 78 | December 2019 Thoughts for the New Chair for Vision Kerikeri day “Progress is measured It is with regret that the Vision Kerikeri (VKK) committee has by the speed at which accepted David Clendon’s resignation from Chair and we destroy the Committee-membership. David resigned in order to avoid conditions that sustain any potential conflicts of interest, following his election as a councillor to the Far North District Council. On behalf of VKK life.” George Monbiot we offer David our proud congratulations and thank him for “The problem with his contributions. comprehension is, it At the following often comes too late.” meeting, committee Rasmenia Massoud, Human member Jo Lumkong was chosen to chair VKK Detritus for the remainder of the Contact Us current year of operation. Fortunately, Our email address is: Jo accepted the [email protected] position despite of her already numerous active We also regularly update our community website engagements like www.visionkerikeri.org.nz Tuhono 200, Our Follow us on Kerikeri and The Facebook: Illumination Workshop. Jo’s big picture thinking New Chair - Jo Lumkong https:// and creativity as interior www.facebook.com/ and product designer visionkerikeri/ are based on her understanding how environment impacts culture, productivity and human psychology. She is also the mother of her two children (10 and 12 years). For more detailed information about Jo, have a look at her Pepeha (PDF). Newsletter No 78 1 visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 Wairoa Stream Projects Spring Time Those of you who regularly walk the Wairoa Stream will be aware of the improvements to the track since it was opened in April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader
    Aurecon New Zealand Limited T +64 9 520 6019 Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road F +64 9 524 7815 Newmarket Auckland 1023 E [email protected] PO Box 9762 W aurecongroup.com Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand 2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader – Resource Consents Far North District Council 5 Memorial Ave Kaikohe 0405 Dear Louise, Following the pre-application meeting which was held with both Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council on 14th November 2019, please find attached a Notice of Requirement and an Outline Plan of Works waiver to alter the designation for State highway 10 at Kaeo, and to replace the existing single-lane bridge with a two-lane bridge. During the pre-lodgement meeting the following matters were covered: Project Scope Discussion of the effects of the project on the existing and surrounding environment, and how these effects can be avoided, remedied or mitigated so that the effects are less than minor Establishment that there are no affected persons, except for those properties within the proposed designation footprint with whom property purchase discussions are underway. It is recommended that the Notice of Requirement is limited notified to the land owners within the Notice of Requirement boundary. For your information, a resource consent application for this project (application number APP.041470.01.01) is being lodged with Northland Regional Council concurrently with the Notice of Requirement. It is being recommended that the resource consent application is non-notified, as for resource consenting purposes, the relevant environmental effects on persons within and near the project area are less than minor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand
    Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS SCIENCE \REPORT 2007/06 May 2007 Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS Science Report 2007/06 May 2007 GNS Science BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Christie, A.B., Barker, R.G. 2007. Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand, GNS Science Report, 2007/06, 179 A B Christie, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt R G Barker, Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, Bucklands Beach, Auckland © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2007 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 0-478-09969-X CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................vii KEYWORDS ..........................................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 2.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS .................................7 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK......................................................................................................................9 4.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................11 5.0 DATA.........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: an Overview
    Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: An Overview March 2021 Prepared by: Dr Lily George Dr Sunitha Gowda Mr Khan Buchwald Te Tai Mahere Ngā Tai Ora CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................... i TABLES......................................................................................................................................................................... ii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................11 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................13 3. RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau .........................................................................................................14 3.2 Emergency Housing Grants (EHGs): ..................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • MISSION HOUSE Mangungu
    MISSION HOUSE Mangungu CONSERVATION PLAN for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Mission House Mangungu CONSERVATION PLAN Report Prepared by CHRIS COCHRAN MNZM, B Arch, FNZIA CONSERVATION ARCHITECT 20 Glenbervie Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand Phone 04-472 8847 Email [email protected] for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Antrim House, 63 Boulcott Street Wellington 6011 Draft for public comment 8 June 2018 Mangungu Mission Station, 1838, before fire destroyed the original mission house (top right) on 19 August 1838, as seen by the eight-year-old Emma Hobbs. Copied from the reproduction hanging in the drawing room of the Mission House Front cover photo, the Mission House in 2010, from the north-west. Photo, Margaret Cochran Back cover photo, the memorial cross marking the re-establishment of the Wesleyan mission in New Zealand in 1827, seen against the waters of the Hokianga Harbour. Photo, Margaret Cochran Contents PROLOGUES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Commission 2 1.2 Ownership and Status 2 1.3 Acknowledgements 3 2.0 HISTORY 5 2.1 History of the Mission House 5 2.2 Chronology 25 2.3 Sources 27 3.0 DESCRIPTION 29 3.1 The Site 29 3.2 Description of the House Today 30 4.0 SIGNIFICANCE 34 4.1 Statement of Significance 34 4.2 Inventory 36 5.0 INFLUENCES ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 68 5.1 Heritage New Zealand’s Objectives 68 5.2 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 69 5.3 Resource Management Act 71 5.4 Building Act 2004 72 5.5 Appropriate Standards 74 5.6 Threats and Risks 76 6.0 POLICIES 79 6.1 Background 79 6.2 Policies 81 6.3 Building Implications of the Policies 85 APPENDIX I 87 Icomos New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Unit Identification Summary: Coastal
    Landscape Unit Identification Summary: Coastal NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION LANDSCAPE CATEGORY PAGES C1 Terakihi Point to Rawhiti Point Exposed rocky coastline 1-3 C2 Islands of the Bay of Islands Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 4-6 C3 Rawhiti Point to Tapeka Point Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 7-9 C4 Tapeka Point to Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 10-12 C5 Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 13-15 C6 Waikare Inlet and Kawakawa River Estuarine inlets and harbours 16-18 C7 Waitangi River Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 19-21 C8 Ti Point to Wairoa Bay Exposed rocky coastline 22-24 C9 Wairoa Point to Onewhero Bay Reef lined coast 25-27 C10 Onewhero Bay to Point adjacent Motupapa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 28-30 C11 Moturoa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 31-33 C12 South Coast of Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 34-36 C13 Inner Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 37-39 C14 North Coast Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 40-42 C15 Te Puna Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 43-45 C16 Poraenui Point to Black Rocks Exposed rocky coastline 46-48 C17 Black Rocks to Haimama Pa Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 49-51 C18 Haimama Pa to Whangaroa South Head Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 52-54 C19 Cavalli Island Group Exposed rocky coastline 55-57 C20 Whangaroa Harbour Mouth and Pekapeka Bay Harbour Mouths 58-60 C21 Milford Island and Associated Coves Estuarine inlets and harbours 61-63 C22 Whangaroa Village / Totara North Coastal Villages
    [Show full text]
  • Iwi-O-Ngāpuhi
    Ngāpuhi moving to the future together Annual Report 2012 Hakatauki He mea hanga tōku whare, ko Papatuānuku te paparahi. Ko nga maunga nga poupou, ko Ranginui e titiro iho nei, te tuanui. Pūhanga-tohora titiro ki Te Ramaroa e whakakurupaeake ra i te Hauāuru. Te Ramaroa titiro ki Whīria, te Paiaka o te riri, te kawa o Rāhiri. Whīria titiro ki Panguru, ki Papata, ki te rākau tū papata ki te tai Hauāuru; Panguru, Papata titiro ki Maungataniwha. Maungataniwha titiro ki Tokerau. Tokerau titiro ki Rākaumangamanga. Rākaumangamanga titiro ki Manaia, e tu kohatu mai ra i te akau. Manaia titiro ki Tutamoe. Tutamoe titiro ki Maunganui. Maunganui titiro ki Pūhanga-tohora. Ehara aku maunga i te maunga nekeneke, he maunga tū tonu, tū te Ao tū te Po. Ko te Whare Tapu o Ngāpuhi tenei, tihei mauri ora. This hakatauki depicts the sacred house of Ngāpuhi. Papatuānuku is the foundation, Ranginui (sky father) is the over arching tuanui (roof) with the sacred mountains being the poupou (pillars). The boundaries are within the area covered by these sacred maunga (mountains) of Ngāpuhi. This must not be confused with the boundary of Ngāpuhi-Nui-Tonu which is contained in the hakatauki - te whare o Ngāpuhi, Tāmaki Makaurau ki te Rerenga Wairua. KAITAIA KAEO Tokerau Maungataniwha Rakaumangamanga WAITANGI Pangaru ki Papata KAIKOHE Te Ramaroa Whiria Puhangatohora Tutamoe Maunganui WHANGAREI Manaia DARGAVILLE 2 Contents Vision & Mission Statements ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Business Report
    Infrastructure and Asset Management Monthly Business Report DECEMBER 2020 CONTENTS SUCCESSES .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 CAPITAL SPEND ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................... 5 ROADING .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 PROJECT DELIVERY .................................................................................................................................................... 17 PROGRAMME DARWIN............................................................................................................................................. 31 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 35 INFRASTRUCTURE COMPLIANCE .............................................................................................................................. 40 ASSET MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 46 DISTRICT FACILITIES .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]