DOCSLIB.ORG

2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader Aurecon New Zealand Limited T +64 9 520 6019 Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road F +64 9 524 7815 Newmarket Auckland 1023 E [email protected] PO Box 9762 W aurecongroup.com Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand 2020-02-17 Louise Wilson Team Leader – Resource Consents Far North District Council 5 Memorial Ave Kaikohe 0405 Dear Louise, Following the pre-application meeting which was held with both Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council on 14th November 2019, please find attached a Notice of Requirement and an Outline Plan of Works waiver to alter the designation for State highway 10 at Kaeo, and to replace the existing single-lane bridge with a two-lane bridge. During the pre-lodgement meeting the following matters were covered: Project Scope Discussion of the effects of the project on the existing and surrounding environment, and how these effects can be avoided, remedied or mitigated so that the effects are less than minor Establishment that there are no affected persons, except for those properties within the proposed designation footprint with whom property purchase discussions are underway. It is recommended that the Notice of Requirement is limited notified to the land owners within the Notice of Requirement boundary. For your information, a resource consent application for this project (application number APP.041470.01.01) is being lodged with Northland Regional Council concurrently with the Notice of Requirement. It is being recommended that the resource consent application is non-notified, as for resource consenting purposes, the relevant environmental effects on persons within and near the project area are less than minor. We look forward to hearing from you soon. Yours faithfully, Claire Cunningham Manager, Environment and Planning Aurecon Project 254914 File NoR cover letter Kaeo Bridge 2020-02-17 Revision 0 Page 1 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Effects on the Environment Prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand January 2020 VERSION 3 NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY January 2020 1 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment This report has been prepared for the benefit of the NZ Transport Agency (the Transport Agency). No liability is accepted by this company or any employee or sub-consultant of this company with respect to its use by any other person. This disclaimer shall apply notwithstanding that the report may be made available to other persons for an application for permission or approval or to fulfil a legal requirement. DOCUMENT CONTROL Report title SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project – Assessment of Effects on the Environment Document ID 254914-3000-REP-NN-0001 File path Client New Zealand Transport Agency Client contact Jane Price Version Date Revision Details Author Reviewer Verifier Approver December Draft for client B. Linkhorn 1 T. Hurdley K. Lepoutre 2017 review P. Wilkinson E. Sparrow Draft for client 2 August 2019 Claire W. Adam review Cunningham E. Sparrow 3 January 2020 Final W. Adam R.Black N. Holman C. Cunningham APPROVAL Author signature Approver signature Name Claire Cunningham Name Nigel Holman Title Manager Title Associate NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY January 2020 2 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment Table of Contents 1 Introduction 9 Purpose of the report 9 Background 10 Project overview 11 Benefits of the SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project 11 Approvals required 12 2 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project Description 13 Project description 13 Road carriageway 13 Bridge works 13 Hydrology management and stormwater treatment 14 Earthworks, vegetation removal and reestablishment 15 Network utilities 16 Site establishment and site compound 16 Landscaping 16 Construction programme and sequencing 17 3 Description of the existing environment 18 Physical environment 18 Human Environment 23 Planning Environment 25 Summary 26 4 Consultation 27 Approach to consultation and engagement 27 Consultation and engagement undertaken 27 Summary 28 5 Assessment of Effects 29 Positive effects 29 Noise and vibration effects and mitigation 29 Landscape and visual effects and mitigation 31 Traffic effects and mitigation 32 Archaeology effects and mitigation 32 Cultural effects and mitigation 33 Contamination effects and mitigation 34 Coastal processes effects and mitigation 35 Erosion and sediment effects and mitigation 38 Flooding effects and mitigation 39 Stormwater quality effects, mitigation and assessment of alternatives 41 Ecology effects and mitigation 41 Summary of Project mitigation 43 5.1 Conclusion 44 NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY January 2020 3 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment 6 Reasons for Resource Consent 45 Introduction 45 Reasons for resource consent 45 7 Notice of Requirement - Assessment of Reasonable Necessity and Consideration of Alternatives 58 Reasonable necessity 58 Assessment of alternatives 60 Conclusion 65 8 Planning Assessment 66 Introduction 66 New Zealand Coastal Policy Statement 66 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health 66 National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2014 66 Regional Policy Statement for Northland 67 Regional Coastal Plan for Northland 68 Regional Water and Soil Plan for Northland 69 Proposed Regional Plan for Northland 70 Far North District Plan 71 Summary 73 9 Statutory Assessment 74 Introduction 74 Legislative framework 74 Land Transport Management Act 82 Government Roading Powers Act 1989 82 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014 82 Reserves Act 83 10 Conclusion 84 Appendices Appendix A – Records of Titles Appendix B – Drawing Set Appendix C – Assessment of Acoustic Effects Appendix D – Assessment of Landscape Effects Appendix E – Integrated Transport Assessment Appendix F – Assessment of Archaeology Effects Appendix G – Contamination Assessment Memorandum Appendix H – Assessment of Coastal Effects Appendix I – Hydraulic Modelling Technical Specialist Report Appendix J – Stormwater Design Report Appendix K – Assessment of Ecological Effects NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY January 2020 4 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment Figures Figure 1: Kaeo Bridge Project Location (source: topomap.co.nz) 10 Figure 2: SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project area and surrounds 18 Figure 3: SH10 Kaeo River catchment 20 Figure 4: Archaeological features identified in 2017 field surveys and historic features recorded from land plans (Geometria Ltd, 2019). 25 Figure 5: Far North District Plan Map 21 - Zone 26 Figure 6: Far North District Plan Map 21- Flooding 26 Figure 7: Flood level check locations. Numbered green dots are properties in or near the Project area 40 Figure 8: Potential detour route around SH10 Kaeo Bridge 59 Figure 9: Project Business Case long list alignment options (Opus 2016) 61 Figure 10: Modified 2016 alignment options re-evaluated in 2017 63 Figure 11: Option 5 evaluated in 2017 64 Tables Table 1: Terms and definitions 6 Table 2: List of abbreviations 7 Table 3: Notice of Requirement property information 23 Table 4: Regional Water and Soil Plan for Northland reason for resource consent - land use 45 Table 5: Regional Water and Soil Plan for Northland reason for resource consent – water permits 47 Table 6: Regional Water and Soil Plan for Northland reason for resource consent – discharge permit 49 Table 7: Regional Water and Soil Plan for Northland - permitted activities 49 Table 8: Proposed Regional Plan for Northland reason for resource consent – Land Use 52 Table 9: Proposed Regional Plan for Northland reasons for resource consent - Water Permit 54 Table 10: Proposed Regional Plan for Northland reasons for resource consent - Discharge Permit 54 Table 11: Proposed Regional Plan for Northland reasons for resource consent - permitted activities 54 Table 12: Notice of Requirement being lodged with FNDC 80 NZ TRANSPORT AGENCY January 2020 5 SH10 Kaeo Bridge Project - Assessment of Effects on the Environment Table 1: Terms and definitions Terms Definitions Amenity values As defined in section 2 of the RMA, amenity values means those natural or physical qualities and characteristics of an area that contribute to people’s appreciation of its pleasantness, aesthetic coherence, and cultural and recreational attributes. Archaeological As defined in the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, site archaeological site means, subject to section 42(3),— (a) any place in New Zealand, including any building or structure (or part of a building or structure), that— (i) was associated with human activity that occurred before 1900 or is the site of the wreck of any vessel where the wreck occurred before 1900; and (ii) provides or may provide, through investigation by archaeological methods, evidence relating to the history of New Zealand; and (b) includes a site for which a declaration is made under section 43(1) Best As defined in Section 2 of the RMA, best practicable option, in relation to practicable a discharge of a contaminant or an emission of noise, means the best option method for preventing or minimising the adverse effects on the environment having regard, among other things, to— (a) the nature of the discharge or emission and the sensitivity of the receiving environment to adverse effects; and (b) the financial implications, and the effects on the environment, of that option when compared with other options; and (c) the current state of technical knowledge and the likelihood that the option can be successfully applied Designation Defined in Section 2 and Section
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Assets Under a Civil Engineering Completed Risks Insurance Policy
    ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME 2015 Completed by Jonathan Santos Asset Management Plan – Kaeo Flood Risk Reduction Scheme Contents KAEO FLOOD RISK REDUCTION SCHEME ............................................................... 1 Contents .................................................................................................................... 1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 5 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Background ................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.1 Purpose of the Plan ........................................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Relationship with Other Planning Documents .................................................. 6 2.1.3 Infrastructure Assets Included in the Plan ........................................................ 6 2.1.4 Key Stakeholder ................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Goals and Objectives of Asset Ownership ................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Justification for Ownership................................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Organisation Vision, Mission, Goals & Objectives ............................................. 7 2.3 Sophistication/Limitation of the AMP ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand
    A supplementary finding-aid to the archives relating to Maori Schools held in the Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand MAORI SCHOOL RECORDS, 1879-1969 Archives New Zealand Auckland holds records relating to approximately 449 Maori Schools, which were transferred by the Department of Education. These schools cover the whole of New Zealand. In 1969 the Maori Schools were integrated into the State System. Since then some of the former Maori schools have transferred their records to Archives New Zealand Auckland. Building and Site Files (series 1001) For most schools we hold a Building and Site file. These usually give information on: • the acquisition of land, specifications for the school or teacher’s residence, sometimes a plan. • letters and petitions to the Education Department requesting a school, providing lists of families’ names and ages of children in the local community who would attend a school. (Sometimes the school was never built, or it was some years before the Department agreed to the establishment of a school in the area). The files may also contain other information such as: • initial Inspector’s reports on the pupils and the teacher, and standard of buildings and grounds; • correspondence from the teachers, Education Department and members of the school committee or community; • pre-1920 lists of students’ names may be included. There are no Building and Site files for Church/private Maori schools as those organisations usually erected, paid for and maintained the buildings themselves. Admission Registers (series 1004) provide details such as: - Name of pupil - Date enrolled - Date of birth - Name of parent or guardian - Address - Previous school attended - Years/classes attended - Last date of attendance - Next school or destination Attendance Returns (series 1001 and 1006) provide: - Name of pupil - Age in years and months - Sometimes number of days attended at time of Return Log Books (series 1003) Written by the Head Teacher/Sole Teacher this daily diary includes important events and various activities held at the school.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019
    Kaeo Bridge Project Assessment of Acoustic Effects New Zealand Transport Agency Reference: 254914 Revision: 4 16 December 2019 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon New Zealand Limited Level 4, 139 Carlton Gore Road Newmarket Auckland 1023 PO Box 9762 Newmarket Auckland 1149 New Zealand T +64 9 520 6019 F +64 9 524 7815 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Assessment of Acoustic Effects Document ID Project number 254914 File path Client New Zealand Transport Agency Client contact Jane Price Client reference Rev Date Revision details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) A. Liberona 1 6 December 2017 Draft for client review J. Grimes F. Parr R. Wareing 2 17 July 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 3 25 September 2019 Draft for Client Review J. Ngo H. Miller - 4 16 December 2019 Minor Amendments J. Ngo H. Miller - Current revision 4 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name J. Ngo Name Title Acoustic Engineer Title Project 254914 File 254914-REP-KB-1.2 Kaeo_Acoustics_v1.4.docx 16 December 2019 Revision 4 Contents 1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................... 6 2 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: a Compilation
    Title page July 2017 Working Paper 2017/04 Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Working Paper 2017/04 Fact Sheets on Existing Initiatives: A compliation July 2017 Title Working Paper 2017/04 – Eight Existing Poverty Initiatives in NZ and the UK: A compilation Published Copyright © McGuinness Institute, July 2017 ISBN 978-1-98-851842-8 (Paperback) ISBN 978-1-98-851843-5 (PDF) This document is available at www.mcguinnessinstitute.org and may be reproduced or cited provided the source is acknowledged. Prepared by The McGuinness Institute, as part of the TacklingPovertyNZ project. Authors Alexander Jones and Ali Bunge Research team Ella Reilly and Eleanor Merton For further information McGuinness Institute Phone (04) 499 8888 Level 2, 5 Cable Street PO Box 24222 Wellington 6142 New Zealand www.mcguinnessinstitute.org Disclaimer The McGuinness Institute has taken reasonable care in collecting and presenting the information provided in this publication. However, the Institute makes no representation or endorsement that this resource will be relevant or appropriate for its readers’ purposes and does not guarantee the accuracy of the information at any particular time for any particular purpose. The Institute is not liable for any adverse consequences, whether they be direct or indirect, arising from reliance on the content of this publication. Where this publication contains links to any website or other source, such links are provided solely for information purposes and the Institute is not liable for the content of any such website or other source. Publishing This publication has been produced by companies applying sustainable practices within their businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth with Vision
    visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 VISION KERIKERI Growth with Vision Newsletter No 78 | December 2019 Thoughts for the New Chair for Vision Kerikeri day “Progress is measured It is with regret that the Vision Kerikeri (VKK) committee has by the speed at which accepted David Clendon’s resignation from Chair and we destroy the Committee-membership. David resigned in order to avoid conditions that sustain any potential conflicts of interest, following his election as a councillor to the Far North District Council. On behalf of VKK life.” George Monbiot we offer David our proud congratulations and thank him for “The problem with his contributions. comprehension is, it At the following often comes too late.” meeting, committee Rasmenia Massoud, Human member Jo Lumkong was chosen to chair VKK Detritus for the remainder of the Contact Us current year of operation. Fortunately, Our email address is: Jo accepted the [email protected] position despite of her already numerous active We also regularly update our community website engagements like www.visionkerikeri.org.nz Tuhono 200, Our Follow us on Kerikeri and The Facebook: Illumination Workshop. Jo’s big picture thinking New Chair - Jo Lumkong https:// and creativity as interior www.facebook.com/ and product designer visionkerikeri/ are based on her understanding how environment impacts culture, productivity and human psychology. She is also the mother of her two children (10 and 12 years). For more detailed information about Jo, have a look at her Pepeha (PDF). Newsletter No 78 1 visionkerikeri.org.nz 11 December 2019 Wairoa Stream Projects Spring Time Those of you who regularly walk the Wairoa Stream will be aware of the improvements to the track since it was opened in April 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand
    Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS SCIENCE \REPORT 2007/06 May 2007 Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand A B Christie R G Barker GNS Science Report 2007/06 May 2007 GNS Science BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Christie, A.B., Barker, R.G. 2007. Mineral resource assessment of the Northland Region, New Zealand, GNS Science Report, 2007/06, 179 A B Christie, GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt R G Barker, Consulting Geologist, PO Box 54-094, Bucklands Beach, Auckland © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2007 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 0-478-09969-X CONTENTS ABSTRACT............................................................................................................................................vii KEYWORDS ..........................................................................................................................................vii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................1 2.0 MINERAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FACTORS AND LIMITATIONS .................................7 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK......................................................................................................................9 4.0 METHODS.................................................................................................................................11 5.0 DATA.........................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Consent Application for Land Use for Te Tahaawai Marae
    , 15.1.6B Parking and 15.1.6C.1.5 Vehicle Crossing Standards in Rural and Coastal Zones Paul Hayman PO Box 250 Kaeo, 0448 New Zealand Tel 09 407 9816 Mob 027 450 5471 [email protected] RESOURCE CONSENT APPLICATION FOR LAND USE FOR TE TAHAAWAI MARAE ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Te Tahaawai Marae Trustees 245 Weber Road Kaeo 10th August 2020 Te Tahaawai Marae 245 Weber Road Kaeo PART 1: DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY SITE Te Tahaawai Marae is located at 245 Weber Road, Kaeo. This site is Pt Te Pupuke K2 Block and is 1.8970 hectares. The site is in the Rural Production Zone of the Far North District Council District Plan. LOCATION Te Tahaawai Marae is located three kilometres South of Whangaroa Harbour, amidst farmland on the Northern boundary and undeveloped ancestral land to the South and West. Weber Road is a gravel, dead-end road that exits State Highway 10. After the Weber-Waihapa Road junction, the road narrows with its maximum width being only five metres. Weber Road is not designed for large volumes of traffic at any one time or for comfortable safe passing, making it a single lane road. There are ten residential properties on Weber Road, most being marae hapu. The road to Te Tahaawai Marae has always been in its current state for residents and while narrow in comparison to city roads, Weber Road is a normal sized road in this Rural District. There have been regular pick up and drop offs for Whangaroa Primary and High School buses and residents and visitors have easily used Weber Road going different directions at the same time, observing respectful road use.
    [Show full text]
  • Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: an Overview
    Kāinga Kore - Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau: An Overview March 2021 Prepared by: Dr Lily George Dr Sunitha Gowda Mr Khan Buchwald Te Tai Mahere Ngā Tai Ora CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................................... i TABLES......................................................................................................................................................................... ii FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................11 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................................................13 3. RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Homelessness in Te Tai Tokerau .........................................................................................................14 3.2 Emergency Housing Grants (EHGs): ..................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • MISSION HOUSE Mangungu
    MISSION HOUSE Mangungu CONSERVATION PLAN for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Mission House Mangungu CONSERVATION PLAN Report Prepared by CHRIS COCHRAN MNZM, B Arch, FNZIA CONSERVATION ARCHITECT 20 Glenbervie Terrace, Wellington, New Zealand Phone 04-472 8847 Email [email protected] for Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Antrim House, 63 Boulcott Street Wellington 6011 Draft for public comment 8 June 2018 Mangungu Mission Station, 1838, before fire destroyed the original mission house (top right) on 19 August 1838, as seen by the eight-year-old Emma Hobbs. Copied from the reproduction hanging in the drawing room of the Mission House Front cover photo, the Mission House in 2010, from the north-west. Photo, Margaret Cochran Back cover photo, the memorial cross marking the re-establishment of the Wesleyan mission in New Zealand in 1827, seen against the waters of the Hokianga Harbour. Photo, Margaret Cochran Contents PROLOGUES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Commission 2 1.2 Ownership and Status 2 1.3 Acknowledgements 3 2.0 HISTORY 5 2.1 History of the Mission House 5 2.2 Chronology 25 2.3 Sources 27 3.0 DESCRIPTION 29 3.1 The Site 29 3.2 Description of the House Today 30 4.0 SIGNIFICANCE 34 4.1 Statement of Significance 34 4.2 Inventory 36 5.0 INFLUENCES ON FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 68 5.1 Heritage New Zealand’s Objectives 68 5.2 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 69 5.3 Resource Management Act 71 5.4 Building Act 2004 72 5.5 Appropriate Standards 74 5.6 Threats and Risks 76 6.0 POLICIES 79 6.1 Background 79 6.2 Policies 81 6.3 Building Implications of the Policies 85 APPENDIX I 87 Icomos New Zealand Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Heritage Value.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Unit Identification Summary: Coastal
    Landscape Unit Identification Summary: Coastal NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF LOCATION LANDSCAPE CATEGORY PAGES C1 Terakihi Point to Rawhiti Point Exposed rocky coastline 1-3 C2 Islands of the Bay of Islands Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 4-6 C3 Rawhiti Point to Tapeka Point Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 7-9 C4 Tapeka Point to Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 10-12 C5 Veronica Channel Estuarine inlets and harbours 13-15 C6 Waikare Inlet and Kawakawa River Estuarine inlets and harbours 16-18 C7 Waitangi River Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 19-21 C8 Ti Point to Wairoa Bay Exposed rocky coastline 22-24 C9 Wairoa Point to Onewhero Bay Reef lined coast 25-27 C10 Onewhero Bay to Point adjacent Motupapa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 28-30 C11 Moturoa Island Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 31-33 C12 South Coast of Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 34-36 C13 Inner Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 37-39 C14 North Coast Kerikeri Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 40-42 C15 Te Puna Inlet Estuarine inlets and harbours 43-45 C16 Poraenui Point to Black Rocks Exposed rocky coastline 46-48 C17 Black Rocks to Haimama Pa Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 49-51 C18 Haimama Pa to Whangaroa South Head Rocky coast interspersed with beaches 52-54 C19 Cavalli Island Group Exposed rocky coastline 55-57 C20 Whangaroa Harbour Mouth and Pekapeka Bay Harbour Mouths 58-60 C21 Milford Island and Associated Coves Estuarine inlets and harbours 61-63 C22 Whangaroa Village / Totara North Coastal Villages
    [Show full text]
  • Iwi-O-Ngāpuhi
    Ngāpuhi moving to the future together Annual Report 2012 Hakatauki He mea hanga tōku whare, ko Papatuānuku te paparahi. Ko nga maunga nga poupou, ko Ranginui e titiro iho nei, te tuanui. Pūhanga-tohora titiro ki Te Ramaroa e whakakurupaeake ra i te Hauāuru. Te Ramaroa titiro ki Whīria, te Paiaka o te riri, te kawa o Rāhiri. Whīria titiro ki Panguru, ki Papata, ki te rākau tū papata ki te tai Hauāuru; Panguru, Papata titiro ki Maungataniwha. Maungataniwha titiro ki Tokerau. Tokerau titiro ki Rākaumangamanga. Rākaumangamanga titiro ki Manaia, e tu kohatu mai ra i te akau. Manaia titiro ki Tutamoe. Tutamoe titiro ki Maunganui. Maunganui titiro ki Pūhanga-tohora. Ehara aku maunga i te maunga nekeneke, he maunga tū tonu, tū te Ao tū te Po. Ko te Whare Tapu o Ngāpuhi tenei, tihei mauri ora. This hakatauki depicts the sacred house of Ngāpuhi. Papatuānuku is the foundation, Ranginui (sky father) is the over arching tuanui (roof) with the sacred mountains being the poupou (pillars). The boundaries are within the area covered by these sacred maunga (mountains) of Ngāpuhi. This must not be confused with the boundary of Ngāpuhi-Nui-Tonu which is contained in the hakatauki - te whare o Ngāpuhi, Tāmaki Makaurau ki te Rerenga Wairua. KAITAIA KAEO Tokerau Maungataniwha Rakaumangamanga WAITANGI Pangaru ki Papata KAIKOHE Te Ramaroa Whiria Puhangatohora Tutamoe Maunganui WHANGAREI Manaia DARGAVILLE 2 Contents Vision & Mission Statements ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Business Report
    Infrastructure and Asset Management Monthly Business Report DECEMBER 2020 CONTENTS SUCCESSES .................................................................................................................................................................. 3 CAPITAL SPEND ANALYSIS........................................................................................................................................... 5 ROADING .................................................................................................................................................................. 10 PROJECT DELIVERY .................................................................................................................................................... 17 PROGRAMME DARWIN............................................................................................................................................. 31 INFRASTRUCTURE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 35 INFRASTRUCTURE COMPLIANCE .............................................................................................................................. 40 ASSET MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................................................................. 46 DISTRICT FACILITIES .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]