DOCSLIB.ORG

Estonia North East Arctic Cold Water Prawn and Cod - Scope Extension with Polish and Latvian Vessels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Estonia North East Arctic Cold Water Prawn and Cod - Scope Extension with Polish and Latvian Vessels Marine Stewardship Council fisheries assessments Estonia North East Arctic cold water prawn and cod - scope extension with Polish and Latvian vessels Announcement Comment Draft Report Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) DNV GL Assessment team Bert Keus and Sigrun Bekkevold Reyktal Ltd, Reval Seafood Ltd., P/R Ocean Tiger and UAB Marlinas Reyktal Fishery client Ltd, Reval Seafood Ltd., P/R Ocean Tiger and UAB Marlinas Assessment Type Scope Extension| Date 2019-08-27 1 Report type: Announcement Comment Draft Report Announcement DNV GL – Business Assurance Comment Draft Report Report title: Scope extension of the Estonia North East Arctic cold DNV GL Business Assurance water prawn and cod fishery - Norway AS Addition of Polish and Latvian Scope extension of the Veritasveien 1 Estonia North East Arctic cold water prawn and cod 1322 HØVIK, Norway fishery - Tel: +47 67 57 99 00 Addition of Polish and Latvian http://www.dnvgl.com Customer: Reyktal Ltd, Reval Seafood Ltd., P/R Ocean Tiger and UAB Reyktal Ltd, Reval Seafood Ltd., P/R Ocean Tiger and UAB , Reyktal Ltd: Veerenni 39, 10138 Tallinn, Estonia P/R Ocean Tiger: Strandgade 10, 3730 Nexø, Denmark UAB Marlinas: Pylimo 4, 91249 Klaipeda, Lithuania Contact person: Mati Savaret, Reyktal Peter Pedersen, P/R Ocean Tiger Aivaras Labanauskas, UAB Marlinas Date of issue: 2019-08-27 Project No.: PRJC-401985-2012-MSC-NOR Organisation ZNONO418 unit: Report No.: 2019-019 Certificate No.: MSC-F-31405 (F-DNV-144850) Objective: Assessment for extension of scope of the Estonia North East Arctic cold water prawn fishery to include Polish and Latvian vessels Prepared by: Verified by: Bert Keus Sandhya Chaudhury Independent expert and team member Principle specialist and service manager Sigrun Bekkevold Team member Copyright © DNV GL 2014. All rights reserved. This publication or parts thereof may not be copied, reproduced or transmitted in any form, or by any means, whether digitally or otherwise without the prior written consent of DNV GL. DNV GL and the Horizon Graphic are trademarks of DNV GL AS. The content of this publication shall be kept confidential by the customer, unless otherwise agreed in writing. Reference to part of this publication which may lead to misinterpretation is prohibited. DNV GL Distribution: Keywords: ☒ Unrestricted distribution (internal and external) MSC Fisheries, Estonia North East Arctic cold water ☐ Unrestricted distribution within DNV GL prawn, scope extension, Polish and Latvian vessels ☐ Limited distribution within DNV GL after 3 years ☐ No distribution (confidential) ☐ Secret Rev. No. Date Reason for Issue Prepared by Verified by Announcement Comment Draft Report 0 2019-08-27 Bert Keus, Sigrun Bekkevold 0 Same as above 0 Same as above 0 Same as above 0 Same as above 2 Introduction This template details the information required from Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) when creating following assessment reports: - Announcement Comment Draft Report (FCP v2.1 Section 7.10) - Client and Peer Review Draft Report (FCP v2.1 Section 7.19) - Public Comment Draft Report (FCP v2.1 Section 7.20) - Final Draft Report (FCP v2.1 Section 7.22) - Public Certification Report (FCP v2.1 Section 7.24) If any discrepancies are noted between this template and the MSC Fisheries Standard, CABs and teams shall use the wording of the MSC Fisheries Standard. CABs or teams may make amendments to the scoring tables to reflect multiple Units of Assessment or multiple scoring elements (e.g. extra rows under each scoring issue). CABs and teams shall ensure it is clear which Unit of Assessment or scoring element is being referenced. CABs shall provide rationale for all Units of Assessment and scoring elements and may group rationales when addressing multiple Units of Assessment or scoring elements. For reassessments, CABs shall report clearly in the conditions section to all parties which conditions have been closed at the end of the certification, and whether any remain open and why. Please complete all unshaded fields. For all notes and guidance indicated in italics, please delete and replace with your specific information. All grey boxes containing instructions may be deleted, e.g. the ‘Introduction’ section. CABs should keep the “to be drafted / completed at…” text to help readers understand why some sections are blank and when they will be populated.Appendix1Appendix1 3 1 Glossary ........................................................................................................... 5 2 Executive summary .......................................................................................... 7 2.1 Main strengths ........................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Main Weeknesses ..................................................................................................... 8 2.3 Draft Determination ................................................................................................... 9 3 Report details ................................................................................................. 10 3.1 Authorship and peer review details ......................................................................... 10 3.2 Version details ......................................................................................................... 12 4 Description of the fishery ................................................................................ 13 4.1 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification and and scope of certification sought 13 4.2 Unit(s) of Assessment and Unit(s) of Certification .................................................. 13 4.3 Overview of the fishery ............................................................................................ 16 4.4 Assessment results overview .................................................................................. 29 5 Traceability and eligibility ............................................................................... 31 5.1 Eligibility date ........................................................................................................... 31 5.2 Traceability within the fishery .................................................................................. 31 5.3 At-sea processing .................................................................................................... 32 5.4 First points of landing .............................................................................................. 32 5.5 Eligibility to enter further chains of custody ............................................................. 34 5.6 Eligibility of Inseparable or Practicably Inseparable (IPI) stock(s) to enter further chains of custody 34 6 Scoring ........................................................................................................... 36 6.1 Summary of Performance Indicator level scores .................................................... 36 6.2 Principle 1 ................................................................................................................ 38 6.3 Principle 2 .............................................................................................................. 83 6.4 Principle 3 .............................................................................................................. 139 7 Appendices .................................................................................................. 176 7.1 Assessment information ........................................................................................ 176 7.2 Evaluation processes and techniques ................................................................... 178 7.3 Peer Review reports .............................................................................................. 180 7.4 Stakeholder input .................................................................................................. 181 7.5 Conditions – delete if not applicable ..................................................................... 182 7.6 Client Action Plan .................................................................................................. 182 7.7 Surveillance ........................................................................................................... 183 7.8 Harmonised fishery assessments – delete if not applicable ................................. 184 7.9 Objection Procedure – delete if not applicable ...................................................... 187 8 Corporate branding ...................................................................................... 188 9 Template information and copyright ............................................................. 189 4 1 Glossary View the MSC-MSCI Vocabulary. Insert an optional glossary or list of acronyms used. Note that any terms defined here shall not contradict terms used in the MSC-MSCI Vocabulary. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACCRONYMS ASCOBANS Agreement on the Conservation of Small Cetaceans in the Baltic, North East Atlantic, Irish and North Seas AFWG Arctic Fisheries Working Group AIS Automatic Identification System AMOVA Analysis of molecular variance BBTA Barents and White Sea Territorial Administration BIOR Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment, Latvia CAB Conformity Assessment Body CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CFP (EU) Common Fisheries Policy CITES Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species CL Carapace length CMS Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Models for an Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
    ISSN 0429-9345 FAO FISHERIES 477 TECHNICAL PAPER 477 Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries Models for an ecosystem approach to fisheries This report reviews the methods available for assessing the impacts of interactions between species and fisheries and their implications for marine fisheries management. A brief description of the various modelling approaches currently in existence is provided, highlighting in particular features of these models that have general relevance to the field of ecosystem approach to fisheries (EAF). The report concentrates on the currently available models representative of general types such as bionergetic models, predator-prey models and minimally realistic models. Short descriptions are given of model parameters, assumptions and data requirements. Some of the advantages, disadvantages and limitations of each of the approaches in addressing questions pertaining to EAF are discussed. The report concludes with some recommendations for moving forward in the development of multispecies and ecosystem models and for the prudent use of the currently available models as tools for provision of scientific information on fisheries in an ecosystem context. FAO Cover: Illustration by Elda Longo FAO FISHERIES Models for an ecosystem TECHNICAL PAPER approach to fisheries 477 by Éva E. Plagányi University of Cape Town South Africa FOOD AND AGRICULTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2007 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrated Study of Economic Effects of and Vulnerabilities to Global Warming on the Barents Sea Cod Fisheries
    Climatic Change (2008) 87:251–262 DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9338-0 An integrated study of economic effects of and vulnerabilities to global warming on the Barents Sea cod fisheries Arne Eide Received: 6 July 2006 /Accepted: 3 October 2007 / Published online: 27 November 2007 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract The Barents Sea area is characterised by a highly fluctuating physical environment causing substantial variations in the ecosystems and fisheries depending upon this. Simulations assuming different management regimes have been carried out to study how physical and biological effects of global warming influence the Barents Sea cod fisheries. A regional, high-resolution representation of the B2 world region (OECD90) scenario from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was used to calculate water temperatures and plankton biomasses by hydrodynamic modelling. These results were included in simulations performed by a multi-fleet, multi-species model, by which a fully integrated model linking to the global circulation model to the Barents Sea fisheries through a regional downscaling to the Barents Sea area is constructed. One factor of particular importance for the natural annual biological variations is the occasional inflow of young herring into the Barents Sea area. The herring inflow is difficult to predict and links to dynamical systems outside the Barents Sea area, complex recruitment mechanisms and oceanographic conditions. These processes are in the study represented by a stochastic representation of herring inflow based on historical observations. According to the performed simulations the biomass fluctuations may slightly increase over the next 25 years, possibly caused by changes in temperature patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophic Cascade Modelling in Bathyal Ecosystems
    Doctoral Thesis Trophic cascade modelling in bathyal ecosystems Author: Supervisor: Valeria Mamouridis Dr. Francesc Maynou A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Bio-Economic Modelling Research Group Dept. de Recursos Marins Renovables (ICM-CSIC) and the Dept. de Ingenier´ıa Hidr´aulica, Mar´ıtima y Ambiental (EHMA-UPC) February 2015 Declaration of Authorship I, Valeria Mamouridis , declare that this thesis titled, ’Trophic cascade modelling in bathyal ecosystems’ and the work presented in it are my own. I confirm that: ∎ This work was done wholly or mainly while in candidature for a research degree at this University. ∎ Where any part of this thesis has previously been submitted for a degree or any other qualification at this University or any other institution, this has been clearly stated. ∎ Where I have consulted the published work of others, this is always clearly attributed. ∎ Where I have quoted from the work of others, the source is always given. With the exception of such quotations, this thesis is entirely my own work. ∎ I have acknowledged all main sources of help. ∎ Where the thesis is based on work done by myself jointly with others, I have made clear exactly what was done by others and what I have contributed myself. Signed: Date: iii INSTITUT DE CI ENCIES` DEL MAR (CSIC) UNIVERSITAT POLIT ECNICA` DE CATALUNYA Abstract Dept. de Ingenier´ıa Hidr´aulica, Mar´ıtima y Ambiental (EHMA-UPC) Dept. de Recursos Marins Renovables (ICM-CSIC) Doctor of Philosophy Trophic Cascade Modelling in Bathyal Ecosystems by Valeria Mamouridis In this Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimación De Índices De Reclutamiento Basados En Variables Y Modelos Biofísicos De Pelágicos Pequeños De La Zona Centro-Sur De Chile: Fase I
    Instituto de Investigación Pesquera Departamento de Pesquerías INFORME DE FINAL PROYECTO SUBSECRETARÍA DE PESCA Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basados en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños de la zona Centro-sur de Chile: Fase I INFORME FINAL ID:2012-56-DAP-17 15 de Febrero 2013 INFORME FINAL ID:2012-56-DAP-17 Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basados en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños de la zona Centro-sur de Chile: Fase I REQUIRENTE Subsecretaría de Pesca UNIDAD EJECUTORA Instituto de Investigación Pesquera Departamento de Pesquerías Av. Cristóbal Colón 2780, Talcahuano – Chile Teléfono: 56-41-2920410 Fax: 56-41-2920411 Correo electrónico: [email protected] Sitio web: www.inpesca.cl JEFE DE PROYECTO Dr. Carolina Parada Véliz Instituto de Investigación Pesquera Departamento de Pesquerías Avda. Cristóbal Colón 2780, Talcahuano CP 4270789 Tel: 56-41-2920410 Fax: 56-41-2920411 Email: cparada@inpesca Talcahuano, 15e Febrero de 2012 ESTIMACIÓN DE ÍNDICES DE RECLUTAMIENTO BASADOS EN VARIABLES Y MODELOS BIOFÍSICOS DE PELÁGICOS PEQUEÑOS DE LA ZONA CENTRO- SUR DE CHILE: FASE I INDICE DE CONTENIDOS PERSONAL PARTICIPANTE 1 RESUMEN EJECUTIVO 3 ANTECEDENTES 4 Variabilidad ambiental y sardina común en la región centro-sur de Chile. 5 Modelación biofísica e índices de reclutamiento 5 OBJETIVO GENERAL Y ESPECÍFICOS CAPITULO 1. IMPLEMENTACION DE UN SISTEMA DE MODELACION BIOFISICA PARA LA SARDINA COMUN 8 1.1. INTRODUCCION 8 1.2. METODOLOGIA (OBJETIVO 4.1) 8 1.2.1. Desarrollar e implementar un sistema de modelación biofísica para la población de sardina común, que acople modelos biológicos y un modelo hidrodinámico validado para la región centro- sur de Chile 8 1.2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling the Economic Impacts of Changes in Thermohaline Circulation with an Emphasis on the Barents Sea Fisheries
    M a x - P l a n c k - I n s t i t u t f ü r M e t e o r o l o g i e Max Planck Institute for Meteorology Modeling the economic impacts of changes in thermohaline circulation with an emphasis on the Barents Sea fisheries Peter Michael Link 33 Berichte zur Erdsystemforschung 2006 Reports on Earth System Science Hinweis Notice Die Berichte zur Erdsytemforschung werden The Reports on Earth System Science are published vom Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie in by the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg in unregelmäßiger Abfolge heraus- Hamburg. They appear in irregular intervals. gegeben. Sie enthalten wissenschaftliche und They contain scientific and technical contributions, technische Beiträge, inklusive Dissertationen. including Ph. D. theses. Die Beiträge geben nicht notwendigerweise The Reports do not necessarily reflect the die Auffassung des Instituts wieder. opinion of the Institute. Die "Berichte zur Erdsystemforschung" führen The "Reports on Earth System Science" continue die vorherigen Reihen "Reports" und the former "Reports" and "Examensarbeiten" "Examensarbeiten" weiter. of the Max Planck Institute. Anschrift / Address Layout: Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie Bettina Diallo, PR & Grafik Bundesstrasse 53 20146 Hamburg Deutschland Titelfotos: vorne: Tel.: +49-(0)40-4 11 73-0 Christian Klepp - Jochem Marotzke - Christian Klepp Fax: +49-(0)40-4 11 73-298 hinten: Web: www.mpimet.mpg.de Clotilde Dubois - Christian Klepp - Katsumasa Tanaka 33 Berichte zur Erdsystemforschung 2006 Modeling the economic impacts of changes
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on the Economic Aspects of Marine Mammal - Fisheries Interactions
    NAMMCO SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF MARINE MAMMAL - FISHERIES INTERACTIONS 16-17 February 2000, Copenhagen North Atlantic Marine Mammal Commission Søndre Tollbodgate 9, Postal address: University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway Tel.: +47 77 64 59 08, Fax: +47 77 64 59 05 Email: [email protected] 2. REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE ECONOMIC ASPECTS OF MARINE MAMMAL - FISHERIES INTERACTIONS The Working Group on the Economic Aspects of Marine Mammal – Fisheries Interactions met in Copenhagen 16-17 February, 2000. The participants in the Working Group are listed in Appendix 1. 1. CHAIRMAN’S WELCOME AND OPENING REMARKS Aqqalu Rosing-Asvid welcomed the members to the meeting (Appendix 1), and noted his pleasure at the wide array of expertise brought to the meeting. He suggested that, since he was an ecologist and felt himself less than qualified to chair some portions of the meeting, a co-chair should be elected. This suggestion was accepted and Trond Bjørndal was selected as co-chair for the Working Group. 2. REVISION AND ADOPTION OF AGENDA The draft agenda (Appendix 2) was adopted without change. Appendix 3 provides the list of documents for the meeting. 3. APPOINTMENT OF RAPPORTEUR Daniel Pike, Scientific Secretary of NAMMCO, was appointed Rapporteur for the meeting. 4. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND THE REQUEST FROM NAMMCO COUNCIL Grete Hovesrud-Broda, General Secretary of NAMMCO, presented SC/8/EC/19, which outlined the background and context of the present request before the Working Group. The precursor to this Working Group was the Working Group on the Role of Minke Whales, Harp Seals and Hooded Seals in the North Atlantic Ecosystem, which met in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Herring, Capelin and Cod in the Greater Barents Sea - Economic Optimal Management from a Norwegian Point of View
    IIFET 2000 Proceedings Management of Herring, Capelin and Cod in the Greater Barents Sea - Economic Optimal Management from a Norwegian point of view Kjetil Helstad The Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract. In this paper the Norwegian economic gains / costs of rebuilding the Norwegian spring-spawning herring (Clupea harrengus) is analysed by including the effect of the herring stock on the cod (Gadus morhua) and capelin (Mallotus villosus) fishery in the Barents Sea. The herring stock collapsed in the late 1960's and went through a rebuilding period until mid 1990's. The size of the herring spawning stock affects the productivity of cod and capelin. The effects are analysed by combining the existing bioeconomic model for the Barents Sea (AGGMULT/ECONMULT) and a bioeconomic model for herring in the Norwegian Sea. Two management strategies for herring are studied under different levels of cod TAC: 1) The possible harvest control rule proposed by ICES (ICES), and 2) The herring stock is kept at a low level (Low). Present value of contribution margin in the cod fishery and especially capelin fishery increases when the herring stock is at a low level. The reduction of present value of the contribution margin in the herring fishery in the Low strategy causes the total contribution margin to decrease compared to a large herring stock (ICES). In the low herring stock simulations a large herring fishery takes place in the beginning to reduce the herring stock. If this fishery is not included, the difference in total contribution margin increases a lot.
    [Show full text]
  • Informe Final FIP 2000-09
    INNFFOORMEE FFIINNAAL Instituto de Investigación FIP Nº 2014-35 Pesquera “Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basado en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños de la zona centro-sur de Chile, Fase II” Av. Colón 2780, Casilla 350 Talcahuano Tel: +56-41-2920410 Fax:+56-41-2920411 [email protected] www.inpesca.cl Talcahuano, Septiembre 2017 FIP 2014-35. Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basado en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños TITULO DEL PROYECTO : Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basado en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños de la zona centro-sur de Chile, Fase II REQUIRENTE : Consejo de Investigación Pesquera, CIP Fondo de Investigación Pesquera Presidente CIP: Pablo Berazaluce Maturana UNIDAD EJECUTORA Departamento de Pesquerías Instituto de Investigación Pesquera Director: Aquiles Sepúlveda Oróstica JEFE PROYECTO : Sebastián Vásquez Pastene Biólogo Marino Instituto de Investigación Pesquera Casilla 350, Talcahuano, Chile Tel.: 56-41-2920410 Fax: 56-41-2920411 E-mail: [email protected] FIP 2014-35. Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basado en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños FIP Nº 2014-35 “ESTIMACIÓN DE ÍNDICES DE RECLUTAMIENTO BASADO EN VARIABLES Y MODELOS BIOFÍSICOS DE PELÁGICOS PEQUEÑOS DE LA ZONA CENTRO-SUR DE CHILE, FASE II” Jefe Proyecto Sebastián Vásquez Pastene AUTORES Sebastián Vásquez Pastene Cristian Salas Domínguez Sergio Núñez Elías Luis Soto Mardones Jaime Letelier Pino Marcos Arteaga Vásquez Claudio Gatica Molina Aquiles Sepúlveda Oróstica Lilian Cisterna Aguayo Alexander Gretchina Instituto de Nicolás Alegría Landeros Investigación Patrix Contreras Acevedo Pesquera Andrés Ospina-Álvarez Octava Región Talcahuano (Chile), 2017 FIP 2014-35. Estimación de índices de reclutamiento basado en variables y modelos biofísicos de pelágicos pequeños INDICE DE CONTENIDOS INDICE DE CONTENIDOS .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Meeting of Economists and Biologists On
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ADVANCED COPY pending SEC number COMMISSION STAFF WORKING PAPER REPORT OF The Joint SGECA - SGRST sub-group meeting on bio-economic modelling Ispra 4-6 October 2005 and 7 – 9 March 2006 This report has been evaluated by the STECF at its November 2005 and its April 2006 Plenary Meeting This report does not necessarily reflect the view of the European Commission and in no way anticipates the Commission’s future policy in this area 2 STECF comments on the report of the Sub-group on bioeconomic models (SGECA-SGRST-05-01): propose a way forward for bio-economic modelling in the EU (STECF Plenary November 2005) STECF was asked the following: The recent subgroup meeting SGECA-SGRST-05-01, assessed bio-economic models, their data requirements and ongoing projects. Based on the outcome of this meeting STECF should propose how better bio-economic advice can be delivered in the future. Background STECF decided in 2003 to organize a series of subgroup meetings with the purpose of investigating the availability of bio-economic models, which could be used to support the advice of STECF on fisheries management. Firstly, a joint subgroup of SGECA and SGRST was asked to review the EIAA model, which is used to assess the economic repercussions of the ACFM advice i.e. fisheries that are subject to quota management. Secondly, a subgroup for Mediterranean fisheries should review models appropriate for economic assessment of fisheries not subject to quota management. Thirdly, the joint SGECA-SGRST subgroup was asked to review available models in a broader context.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impacts of Global Warming a Study of the Fishing Industry in North Norway
    Fisheries Research 56 (2002) 261–274 Economic impacts of global warming A study of the fishing industry in North Norway Arne Eide*, Knut Heen1 The Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University of Tromsø, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway Received 29 June 2000; received in revised form 27 March 2001; accepted 14 June 2001 Abstract Several studies have been carried out on the possible physical and biological effects of global warming in the Barents Sea area. Based on these studies this paper discusses the effects global warming may have on the Barents Sea fisheries and the implications for the North Norwegian economy. The first has been studied using the multispecies, multifleet model ECONMULT, and the latter by applying an Input–Output model. A range of possible environmental scenarios based on the physical and biological studies of the effects of global warming has been examined. Both positive and negative biological growth effects have been considered, changing the current growth rates by Æ25%. A more narrow range of management regimes has been applied, reflecting the current management rules and fishery policy in the region. The paper analyses the potential of global warming for changing the catches, profitability, employment impacts and income generation by the Barents Sea fisheries. # 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Global warming; Fisheries management; Economic impact; North Norwegian fisheries; ECONMULT 1. Introduction assuming that natural climate variability and the structure and strength of ocean currents remain about This paper discusses some possible economic the same. The positive effects of warming, such as effects of global warming on the fish resources in longer growing seasons, lower natural winter mortal- the Barents Sea and the implications for the North ity, and faster growth rates in higher latitudes, may be Norwegian economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wkimm Report 2010
    ICES WKIMM REPORT 2010 SCICOM STEERING GROUP ON REGIONAL SEA PROGRAMMES ICES CM 2010/SSGRSP:05 REF. SSGRSP, SSGSUE, SCICOM Report of the Workshop on Introducing Coupled Ecological-Economic Modelling and Risk Assessment into Management Tools (WKIMM) 16–18 June 2010 Kiel, Germany International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2010. Report of the Workshop on Introducing Coupled Ecological-Economic Modelling and Risk Assessment into Management Tools (WKIMM), 16–18 June 2010, Kiel, Germany. ICES CM 2010/SSGRSP:05. 44 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2010 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WKIMM REPORT 2010 | i Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 1 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 2 2 Objective ......................................................................................................................... 2 3 Overview of existing
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Anniversary of the PINRO-IMR Cooperation in The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives 20th anniversary of the PINRO-IMR cooperation in the investigations of fish feeding in the Barents Sea – results and perspectives Andrey V. Dolgov1, Natalia A. Yaragina1, Emma L. Orlova1 Bjarte Bogstad2, Edda Johannesen2 and Sigbjørn Mehl2 1 PINRO 2Institute of Marine Research Abstract Since 1986 the Institute of Marine Research, (IMR), Norway and the Knipovich Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), Russia, have carried out a joint research program on the trophic relationships in the Barents Sea. As part of this program, the two institutions have exchanged quantitative diet data from fish in the Barents Sea, mainly cod. Diet data can give information about important trophic links in the ecosystem and the strength of those links. Therefore, diet data is important for quantifying interactions between fish stocks, e.g. by calculating how natural mortality due to predation influences their dynamics. In this paper we give an overview of diet data collected by IMR and PINRO during the last 20 years, and present some results and perspectives for future work. Background Trophic investigations using quantitative diet data started in the Barents Sea in the 1920s- 1930s (e.g. Idelson, 1929; Zenkevich and Brotskaya, 1931; Zatsepin and Petrova, 1939; Zatsepin, 1939; Brown and Cheng, 1946) and continued during the 1950-1960s (e.g. Grinkevich, 1957; Sysoeva, 1958; Ponomarenko, 1958). After this period, studies on fish feeding in the Barents Sea were not so intensive and used mainly qualitative diet analyses (e.g.
    [Show full text]